the radar screen project: status report and next steps learning 2010 26 october 2010 bob baker murry...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Radar Screen Project:Status Report and Next Steps
Learning 201026 October 2010
Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman
![Page 2: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Vision for this Project
This project will result in an interactive graphical representation on The Learning CONSORTIUM website that will provide aninsight on a wide range of technologies, tools, and methodsthat are or will be adopted in the future for learning solutionsin the workplace.
Adapted from Radar Screen planning document 9 February 2010
DRAFT
![Page 3: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Topics for Discussion• What we did following Learning 2009?• Prepared use-case scenarios• Devised an “adoption timeline”• Developed a “wireframe” for data visualization• Decided on a collection strategy• Constructed a data collection tool• Completed a pilot • Delayed development of underlying data structure
• What did we learned from our efforts to date?• Design Considerations• Feedback
• What input do you have for next steps?
![Page 4: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What We Did
Use Case Scenarios
• A new learning facility is being planned• 18-24 months to build• In use for 15 years
• Annual Budget-Planning• Budgets are declining• Learning is important
• Learning Program Design• Requirements are different than any previous projects• Timeline is compressed
• Long-term Learning Strategy Being Developed• Change the status quo and increase the impact of learning• Capitalize on affordances of new technologies
![Page 5: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What We Did
Adoption Timeline
Scale “radar screen bands”
Definitiona tool or technology that…
Sub-levels
Invention Space … is in the incubation stage; may not have a specific application for workplace learning
• In the lab• Prototype development
Market Space … has achieved business, personal or K-12 use, but not used in the work place for learning applications
• Experimental• Pilots underway• Targeted implementation
Work Space … is commonly used in the work place, but not specifically for learning applications
• Experimental• Pilots underway• Targeted implementation
Commonly Used for Learning
… is being used for specific learning applications in the work place
• Use cases are growing• Growth is slowing
Note: We also added a category “Almost past”
![Page 6: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What We Did
Wireframe
![Page 7: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What We Did
Data Collection Strategy
• Data Collection Options Considered
Reports/Literature SurveyMASIE Center Surveys“Scouts”“Governing Board”“Real-time” updatable environment “crowd sourcing”
• Decided on “Scouts”Selected set of Consortium MembersProvide periodic feedback using a data collection toolProvide an “optic” adoption in their specific organizationRepresent a wide-range of private and public sectors
![Page 8: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What We Did
Data Collection Tool
![Page 9: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What We Did
Data Collection Tool
![Page 10: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What We Learned
Design Consideration: Wide Variation in Adoption Tool/Technology/ Methodology
Number of scouts = 7
InventionSpace
MarketSpace
Work Space
Common for
Learning
AlmostPast
Smart phone 1 1 2 3 0
Table computers 1 2 2 1 0
Micro blogging 0 1 3 3 0
Video-on-Demand 0 1 2 4 0
Wikis 0 0 1 6 0
![Page 11: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What We Learned
Design Consideration: Scout Pool
• Ensuring the ample size is sufficiently representative
• Able to highlight both “central tendency” and “variation”
• Provide a basis “deeper dive” on adoption decisions strategies, and experiences
• Offer insight into adoption trends over time
• Enable consistent response rates• Pilot rate: 16 Scouts + 7 Responses = 44 %
![Page 12: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What We Learned
Feedback • What thoughts do you have about the adoption timeline?• Need plain language• Invention Space to Market Space flow; the others do not flow• Technologies could stabilize at “almost past”• Should be a stage for learning experiment/innovation
• What would you like to know about the technologies?• The usual: vendor listings, feedback, best practices• Milestones for each of the steps in the progression• How to integrate into overall learning plan• Who is actually using it; case studies; testimonials • Likelihood of it sticking; level of effort to implement/sustain
• Other thoughts about the project you would like to share?• Create a blog where project members can share observations/ideas• Scouts collaboratively develop foundational charts; others rate
![Page 13: The Radar Screen Project: Status Report and Next Steps Learning 2010 26 October 2010 Bob Baker Murry Christensen Suzanne Schneeman](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062714/56649d405503460f94a199f3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Input for Next Steps
• What is most/least useful about what we have designed to date?
• How would the Radar Screen be of use to you back at work?
• How can we capture/portray the richness in diversity of adoption experiences?
• What is missing in what we did so far?
•
•