the path to wcag 2.0 through industry based training dr scott hollier a/professor denise wood
TRANSCRIPT
The Path to WCAG 2.0 Through IndustryBased Training
Dr Scott Hollier
A/Professor Denise Wood
Web accessibility in Australia
• Australia a signatory to UNCRPD• 18.5% people have some form of
permanent disability • Government policy on web accessibility
ad-hoc and inconsistent until 2010• Catalysts for change:
• WCAG 2.0 release in 2008 • National Broadband Network (NBN) • Gov 2.0
National Transition Strategy (NTS)
• In June 2010, Australian Federal government released NTS
• Three phases: • Preparation phase second half of 2010• Transition phase: 2011 • Implementation phase:
• WCAG 2.0 Level A by end of 2012 • WCAG 2.0 Level AA by end of 2014
Government implementation issues
• Lack of resources • Few staff overseeing NTS • Lack of training and internal materials
• Need to up-skill staff• ICT professionals need WCAG 2.0 training• Unaware of accessibility in authoring tools• Little practical understanding of how people with
disabilities interact online
• Potential solution: create University-backed web accessibility course based on W3C standards
Market research key questions
• What are the key objectives of the course?
• Who is the target audience? • How long should the course run? • Face-to-face component or online only? • What types of assessment would help
students? • Are we reinventing the wheel?
Research results
• Need: to understand how to incorporate accessibility into existing work practices using existing authoring tools
• No obvious existing tertiary-backed course • Basic HTML pre-requisite• Full semester too long, about half the time
would be helpful • Online delivery and flexible with work• Learning to caption video: big priority
CurriculumModules
• How people with disabilities access the Web
• Policy and legislation• WCAG 2.0 Level A (time priority)• WCAG 2.0 Level AA & AAA• ATAG 2.0 (draft) • Basic auditing, good V bad design, future
technologies (WCAG-EM, WAI-ARIA, HTML5, cloud)
Course assessment and discussion
• Assignments: • Screen reader use with monitor turned off and WCAG
POUR/Guidelines introduction• Captioning of any 2 minute video, ATAG review on an
authoring tool• Creating an accessible website template and audit
report
• Forum: • Includes introductions, general discussion, reflections
on modules • Feedback indicates forum discussion is as important
as curriculum and assessment
Successes and challenges
What worked: • Successful pilot in 2011, three intakes in 2012,
three this year • Integrated accessibility into work practices• Alumni discussion forum created
What’s changed: • Three assignments in six weeks too much,
provided extra time• Refining admin processes
StudentEvaluations
• Before and after: definite shift to advanced knowledge
• Little increase in experts
The future
Course: •Three offerings this year •Ongoing curriculum updates •Incorporation of emerging technologies
W3C: •Looking to support WAI curriculum initiatives and approval processes
Further information
• Course: • www.mediaaccess.org.au/learn
• Dr Scott Hollier: • E-mail: [email protected]• Website: www.mediaaccess.org.au
• A/Prof Denise Wood: • E-mail: [email protected]• Website: www.unisa.edu.au