the pasteur principle: chance favors the prepared mind
DESCRIPTION
The Pasteur Principle: Chance Favors the Prepared Mind. How Best Practices for Managing Sponsored Projects Prepare for Audits. Michelle Melin-Rogovin Manager Research Administration, Office for Research; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Melody Delfosse - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Pasteur Principle: Chance Favors the Prepared Mind
How Best Practices for Managing Sponsored Projects Prepare for Audits
YOUR PRESENTERS
Michelle Melin-Rogovin• Manager Research Administration, Office for Research;
Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineMelody Delfosse• Information Team Manager, Northwestern University
Accounting Services for Research & Sponsored Projects
OBJECTIVES• Review the types of audits and how to prepare for
them• Learn about the relationship between research
administration best practices and audit preparedness• Discuss institutional roles and responsibilities for
audit preparedness and support in the event of an audit
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
• 2500 Faculty• 3 Research-Heavy
Schools on 2 Campuses• 20 Interdisciplinary
Research Centers• $550M Per Year in
Sponsored Awards
TYPES OF AUDIT• Site visit
• Assessing whether the site is suitable for the research• Can include observing facilities, interacting with staff and students,
accessing documentation• Desk audit
• Systematic review of documents and materials provided by institution under audit
• Can be on campus or conducted via email, phone, or video conference• Investigation
• A review prompted by a potential misconduct
WHO CONDUCTS THE AUDIT?• Internal audit department• External auditing firms• Federal Office of Inspector General (OIG)• State or local government• Institutions that issue sub-awards• Any agency that issues awards
THE A-133 AUDIT• OMB Circular A-133 requires an annual external audit of
non-profit organizations expending more than $500,000 in federal funds
• Viewed as a ‘report card’ of how the University spends their money
• Findings are reported to the federal government, become public record, and are distributed to all federal agencies through a clearinghouse
A-133 – WHAT IS TESTED?A sample of federal awards and their direct cost transactions are selected for testing to determine if expenditures and procedures are appropriate
• Internal control testing • Benefit of expenditures to the
grant• Effort reporting• Cost transfers• Program income eligibility • Sub-recipient monitoring
• Key personnel• Indirect cost and fringe benefit
rate application • Equipment and real-property
management • Service centers • Student financial aid
AUDIT TRENDS• Appropriateness of direct charges• Cost transfers• Subrecipient monitoring• Effort reporting accuracy and timeliness• Proof of payables• Equipment management• Timeliness of technical and financial reports• Administrative cost
• OIG Desk Audit of ARRA FundsThe works
• Dept. of Energy Site VisitEquipment walk through, faculty and staff interviews,
programmatic review
• NSF Desk AuditReview of expenditures reported on FFR
• Dept. of JusticeSub-recipient monitoring, administrative salaries, programmatic
review, validity of expenditures
RECENT AUDITS AT NORTHWESTERN
CENTRAL OFFICE PREPAREDNESS• Before meeting with auditors, resolve issues and be prepared to justify
and support anything unusual
• Audits can occur at any time, so be prepared to allocate staff time for audit prep
• Continually update and review policies, roles & responsibilities documents, and process documents
• Do cost to risk analysis of central roles to determine what must be reviewed prior to a transaction vs. what can be post audited
• If there are findings, you may need to hire consultants to add credibility
BUDGETING AS A CONTROLExamples from NorthwesternSpending can only occur on open budgetary accounts opened by pre-
award office based on award terms and conditions. Some items in restricted categories include:
• Capital equipment• Consulting• Subcontracts• Animals and animal care• Human subjects
• Office supplies• Administrative salaries• Books• Tuition• Stipend
APPROVE HIGH RISK TRANSACTIONSExamples from NorthwesternPeopleSoft workflow is configured to send research accounting office
high risk purchase requests for approval
• Capital equipment• Consulting• Subcontracts• Travel• If total request is $2,500+• Items charged to unusual expense accounts like indirects, payroll
or tuition
DETAILED REVIEW AT CLOSEOUTExamples from NorthwesternPrior to award closeout, research accounting office:
• Verifies effort certification is complete and valid• Reviews expenses for unallowable costs• Validates that indirect costs were charged appropriately• Insures subcontracts are finalized• Obtains PI certification attesting to validity of final expenses• Accounts for all program income
DEPARTMENT AND SCHOOL LEVEL PREPAREDNESS
SCHOOL LEVEL AUDIT PREPAREDNESSFEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE • Disseminates, promotes and implements consistent
adherence to university policies and business practices• Develops structures, policies and roles that respond to the
unique risk environment facing biomedical researchers• Human subjects/animal research• Financial Conflict of Interest in medical research• Complexity in research administration environment
• Actively engages with University and affiliate organizations affecting its audit environment to proactively manage research activities and address issues.
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SERVICES• Provides cradle to grave research administration services
to 14 medical school departments. (95 investigators, $30M+ portfolio)
• Provides training and education to staff on how to manage sponsored projects (financial management, compliance, how to work with PI’s)
• Provides assistance when problems are discovered with accounts that need to be fixed and documented with the sponsor.
• Supports the PI and department in the event of an audit.
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SERVICES• 12 research administrators and financial administrators work directly
with investigators and staff in departments to promote best practices • Financial Management of sponsored projects
• Tracking prime project and subcontractors• A21-driven best practices to manage allocation of costs to sponsored
projects• Compliance management behaviors
• Meetings with PI’s – regular reporting• Salary and effort management best practices
• Bridge people in central offices and school level offices with people working in departments to overcome barriers, and maximize understanding and successful outcomes
DEPARTMENT LEVEL AUDIT PREPAREDNESSSponsored Research Administration Best Practices:1. Direct Charging
a. Within 90 days
2. Reconciliation3. Timely Reporting
a. Internal – PI b. External – Progress Reports, FFRsc. Effort
4. Documentationa. Support your activitiesb. Document your decisions (at every level)
5. Communicationa. Meetings with PIsb. Department Business Administratorsc. Subcontractors
SALARY AND EFFORT MANAGEMENT TOOL• Allows the research administrator, business administrator and
PI to manage position funding across all sources of activity• Dynamic document that manages salary and effort together –
as related concepts. • Presented by source of funding for non-financial types, with
financial checks • Reconciled and updated when effort is proposed and certified,
clinical commitments change, and research ends and begins.
(VIEW SALARY AND EFFORT MANAGEMENT TOOL)
PROJECT FINANCIAL TRACKER• Examines the status of a sponsored project by month, by year for the project
year (by account code open for the project).• Provides rolling account balances for each year of the project and total
account balances for the status of the project (carry forward). • Provides expenses to budget for the project year.
• Answers the main questions PI’s ask:• How much have I spent this month? This year so far?• Am I over or under my budget?• Has this expense been paid?
• Serves as a reconciliation tool for the research/financial administration team. • Can be used to roll up summary portfolio data for the PI.
• Multi-project data can be presented in table format• Pivot tables and summaries provide key data.
(VIEW FINANCIAL TRACKER)
THREE THINGS YOU CAN DO NOW1. Set up systems to review projects with PIs and
obtain feedback/signatures from investigators.2. Review your institution’s documentation
retention policies and determine if your unit is following them.
3. Utilize current systems to “capture” documentation of decisions that will assist compliance without adding burden to process.
Public Perception Reality
AS LONG AS THE DISCONNECT EXISTS,WE WILL BE AUDITED