the namibian chapter - nrsc namibian... · road accidents are preventable, preservation of human...
TRANSCRIPT
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.
The Namibian Chapter
Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020
Decade of Action cover.indd 1Decade of Action cover.indd 1 5/31/12 9:12 AM5/31/12 9:12 AM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. i
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Table of ContentsFOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... iii
ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. v
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................11.1 Current Namibia Road Safety Situation ..............................................................................................11.2 Namibia Road Safety Strategy (2009-2030) ......................................................................................21.3 Global Plan for DoA ..........................................................................................................................2
2. HIGH LEVEL STATEMENTS ............................................................................................................3
3. STRATEGIC THEMES ....................................................................................................................4
4. OBJECTIVES & STRATEGY MAP ....................................................................................................64.1 Objectives.........................................................................................................................................64.2. Strategy Map ....................................................................................................................................6
5. UNDERSTANDING THE SCORECARD ..............................................................................................95.1 Scorecard Components .....................................................................................................................95.2 Defi ning good Performance Indicators (PIs) ......................................................................................95.3 Targets & Benchmarking ..................................................................................................................95.4 Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................10
6. COSTING & BUDGETING .............................................................................................................11
7. CSFS FOR SUCCESSFUL STRATEGY EXECUTION .........................................................................14THEME A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT [PILLAR 1] .............................................................................17THEME B: EDUCATION [PILLAR 4] ..........................................................................................................21THEME C: ENFORCEMENT [PILLAR 4] ....................................................................................................24THEME D: ENGINEERING: VEHICLES [PILLAR 3] ....................................................................................27THEME E: ENGINEERING: ROADS [PILLAR 2] .........................................................................................30THEME F: EMERGENCY RESPONSE [PILLAR 5] ......................................................................................34OUTPUTS & OUTCOMES .........................................................................................................................38
Decade of Action.indd iDecade of Action.indd i 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.ii
FOREWORD Over the past few years, substantive efforts have been undertaken in the quest to improve safety on our roads. These efforts are commendable though fragmented and incoherent. The Decade of Action therefore provides an ample opportunity for Namibia to consolidate her efforts for the sole purpose of making meaningful strides towards the reduction of road related accidents and their resultant agony and human mutilation.
In 2009, Namibia joined the rest of the world at the Global Ministerial Conference that was held in Moscow. The main purpose of the conference was to solicit global support for the implementation of the recommendations of the World Report on Injury Prevention published in 2004 by the World Health Organisation in collaboration with the World Bank. In addition, support was also solicited for the call for a global Decade of Action for road safety initiated by the Commission for Global Road Safety under the chairmanship of Lord George Robertson.
Subsequent to the Moscow meeting, the Ministry of Works and Transport obtained Cabinet approval for the implementation of the Decade of Action once approved by the UNGA. Cabinet further instructed the Ministry to develop comprehensive modalities through which the Decade of Action could be implemented. It is in response to the said Cabinet directive that this document was developed.
With the fi nal endorsement by Cabinet (Decision number 23rd/15.12.11/020), the Namibian Chapter of the Decade of Action 2011-2020, acquired the authority of a Cabinet directive with binding powers on all affected ministries, organisations and agencies as this is the time for all of us to make our inputs.
Now is the time for action.
Erkki Nghimtina, MPMINISTER Ministry of Works and Transport
Decade of Action.indd iiDecade of Action.indd ii 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. iii
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Namibian chapter of the Decade of Action 2011-2020: is a roadmap that outlines the focus areas, objectives and initiatives that NRSC and all road safety stakeholders in Namibia intend to take in order to achieve improved road safety for the period 2011-2020. This Plan, developed in response to the United Nations General Assembly’s call for a Decade of Action, provides an integrated picture of where road safety should be over the next ten years and serves as a communication vehicle for conveying specifi c direction, focus and allocation of resources in response to the country’s road safety challenges. This strategic plan was compiled in close collaboration with the key role players and will form the basis for performance management.
This strategy is based on the following key documents:
• Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009-2014 (NRSS)
• Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020 (GP DoA)
Development process: This strategic plan has been compiled through broad-based participation of road safety stakeholders, partners and supporters. The process of preparing this strategic plan began with the mini-workshop facilitated by Stratex Consulting on 3 March 2011 in Windhoek. Thereafter mini-thematic workshops were organised and attended by role players within a given function area during March 2011.
The Vision (from the NRSS) is: “The safety of all road users is ensured and that all necessary efforts are taken towards preventing traffi c deaths and injuries”
The Mission (from the NRSS) is: “To make Namibia’s road network one of the safest in Africa”
The seven core Values & Principles (from the NRSS), are:
Road accidents are preventable, Preservation of human life is above everything else, Total involvement of the community, Collaboration, Capacity enhancement, Sustainability and Socio-economic development.
If Namibia wishes to achieve its road safety vision, it has to perform in 6 Themes, viz.:
A: Road Safety ManagementB: EducationC: EnforcementD. Engineering: VehiclesE: Engineering: RoadsF: Emergency Response
A total of 18 objectives were identifi ed. The hypothesis is that if all these 18 objectives in the 6 identifi ed themes are achieved, we will realise our vision for road safety in Namibia.
The Road Safety DoA Scorecard is presented in Annexure A and takes the strategy map (‘strategy wheel’) and gives it more detail. The Scorecard therefore presents the detailed strategies that must be implemented, in other words the action plan. The Scorecard includes the following:
• The 6 Themes
• The 18 Objectives with accountabilities
• Performance Indicators (PIs) and Targets for each Objective
Decade of Action.indd iiiDecade of Action.indd iii 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.iv
• Initiatives with their priorities and responsibilities
• Cost estimates of all initiatives (expected total cost over the 10 year period)
• Scheduling of these initiatives over the 10 year period
SMART objectives are achieved through initiatives. Initiatives are defi ned as current and future activities or projects needed to meet the performance targets, as stated in the PIs and Targets for each Objective. Initiatives drive the strategic performance and are the means by which objectives are achieved. Initiatives are prioritised.
Note that capacity (in terms of human, structural, physical, monetary and relational resources) needs to be built in each theme to allow proper execution of the strategy.
The Figure below shows that the total strategic budget for this 10 year period is approximately N$747 million. The average total annual amount required to realise all initiatives in all Themes is approximately N$75 million. The total annual budgets vary from N$90 million in Year 1 to N$70 million in the later years. Themes B, C and F require the majority of all funding.
TOTAL N$ [000s] Theme Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y0112 900 A 14 920 14 331 13 981 9 781 10 281 9 981 9 781 9 781 9 781 10 281 152 800 B 18 850 18 450 18 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 550 223 500 C 23 550 23 550 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 35 800 D 4 600 4 400 4 200 3 200 3 200 3 400 3 200 3 200 3 200 3 200 83 400 E 8 740 8 740 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240
138 500 F 19 017 19 017 14 017 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350
746 900 TOTAL 89 677 88 488 80 738 70 471 69 371 69 271 70 471 68 871 68 871 70 671
The annual costs above are approximately double that of the annual budgets in the approved NRSS. It should be noted that the above strategic budget includes road safety element in budgets of MWT, MoHSS, MoE, MVAF and other ministries and organisations.
Critical success factors for successful strategy execution are presented in this Plan. Without these critical building blocks in place, it would be impossible to successfully implement this Strategic Plan.
Decade of Action.indd ivDecade of Action.indd iv 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. v
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
ABBREVIATIONS Acc : Accountability (for objective)ALS : Advanced life skillsBLS : Basic life skillsBSC : Balanced ScorecardCBO : Community-based organisationCEO : Chief Executive Offi cerCoW : City Council of Windhoek (City Police)Com : CommunityCRF : Central Revenue FundCSF : Critical Success Factor(s)Cust : CustomsDoA : Decade of ActionDS : Driving SchoolDTC : Driver Testing CentreEMU : Emergency Management Unit (in OPM)GIZ : German Development Agency?GP : Global PlanGRN : Government of the Republic of NamibiaGRSP : Global Road Safety Partnership, NamibiaHPSI : Health Programme Schools InitiativeHR : Human resource(s)ICT : Information and communication technologyILS : Intermediate life skillsIPOO : Inputs – Processes – Outputs - OutcomesIRMS : Integrated Road Safety Management SystemKAP : Knowledge, Awareness & Perception (survey)KM : Knowledge managementLA : Local AuthorityLM : Line MinistryMERIL-D : Measure, Evaluate, Report, Improve & Learn, all around Drive (Motivation) & Dialogue Mgt : ManagementMin : MinistryMET : Ministry of Environment and TourismMFA : Ministry of Foreign AffairsMIS : Management information systemMHAI : Ministry of Home Affairs and ImmigrationMoHSS : Ministry of Health & Social ServicesMICT : Ministry of Information & Communication TechnologyMME : Ministry of Mines and EnergyMoD : Ministry of DefenceMoE : Ministry of EducationMoF : Ministry of FinanceMoJ : Ministry of JusticeMoL : Ministry of Labour and Social ServicesMRLGHRD : Ministry of Regional and Local Government, Housing and Rural Development MSS : Ministry of Safety and SecurityMTI : Ministry of Trade and IndustryMVAF : Motor Vehicle Accident FundMWT : Ministry of Works and TransportMYNSSC : Ministry of Youth, National Service, Sport and Culture
Decade of Action.indd vDecade of Action.indd v 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.vi
NA : Not available or not applicableNABTA : Namibia Bus and taxi AssociationNAMCIS : Namibia Magistrates Courts Information SystemNAMCOL : Namibia College of Open LearningNAMPA : Namibia Press AgencyNANANASO : Namibia Network of Aids Service Organisations NANGOF : Namibia Non-Governmental Organisations Forum TrustNASOMA : National Social Marketing ProgrammeNaTIS : National Traffi c Information SystemNBC : Namibia Broadcasting CorporationNCAP : New car Assessment ProgrammeNDI : National Driving InstituteNDP3 : National Development Plan 3NPC : National Planning CommissionNAMPol : Namibian Police (NAMPOL), Traffi c DivisionNGO : Non-governmental OrganisationNMT : Non-motorised transportNOLNet : Namibian Open Learning NetworkNRAF : Namibia Road Accident FormNRSC : National Road Safety CouncilNSI : Namibian Standards InstituteO : ObjectiveOPM : Offi ce of the Prime MinisterPI : Performance indicator PM : Project managementPMBOK : Project Management Body of Knowledge (of PMI, USA)PMS : Performance Management System (of Namibia)PoN : Polytechnic of NamibiaPPP : Public-Private PartnershipPr : PriorityPriv : Private sectorQ : Quarter RA : Roads Authority of NamibiaRC : Regional CouncilResp : Responsibility (for initiative)RMS : Road Management System (of RA)RSF : Road Safety FundRSO : Road safety offi cerRSS : Road Safety Strategy (2009-2014)RTI : Road traffi c injurySADC : Southern African Development CommunitySARPCCO : Southern African Regional Police Chiefs Cooperation OrganisationSFA : Strategic Focus AreaSH : StakeholderSJO : Self/Jointly/Outsource (of initiatives)STRATEX : Strategy ExecutionSWOT : Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities & ThreatsTBD : To be determinedTC : Theme CommitteeToT : Training of TrainersUNAM : University of NamibiaV2030 : Vision 2030 VTC : Vehicle testing centreWBCG : Walvis Bay Corridor GroupWHO : World Health Organisation
Decade of Action.indd viDecade of Action.indd vi 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 1
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 Current Namibia Road Safety Situation
All over the world, road transportation, despite its immense contribution to the development of soci eties, has itself become a socio-economic problem in terms of the carnage and maiming it wreaks on people and property. The consequences of road ac cidents continue to drain the already scarce fi nan cial resources of nations in terms of damage to ve hicles, administrative and medical costs, and most of all, the unquantifi able loss of life. The rapid rise in the number of vehicles has contributed to in creased numbers of road accidents and injuries.
Worldwide, an estimated 1.2 million people are killed in road accidents each year, and as many as 50 million are injured. Projections indicate that these fi gures will increase by about 65% over the next 20 years unless there is new commitment to prevention (WHO 2004).
In Namibian currently approximately 300 people are killed every year in road accidents. This is just too high for the country’s low vehicle and human population levels. In addition to the current intolerably high number of lives lost, about 3 000 people per year are injured in these road accidents. As a result, our society is forced to bear the brunt in terms of huge costs that are estimated to be about 2% of our gross domestic product. It leaves a serious social and emotional scar in our communities. Road traffi c injuries are one of the leading causes of death among school going young pedestrians and are predicted to increase as we become more highly motorized.
2009 vehicle accident statistics in Namibia reveals the following:· No of annual accidents: 15 504
· No of annual injuries: 3 845 (MVAF)
· No of annual fatalities: 525 (MVAF)
· Regions: Regions with most ac cidents: Khomas - 55%; Erongo -12%; Otjozondjupa - 9%
· Urban/rural: although there were more accidents in urban areas than in rural areas, there were more fatalities in rural areas. Ohangwena which has the least registered vehicle population, had the highest fatality rate at 42.5 for every 10 000 registered vehicles.
· Peak periods: July had the most crashes followed by July. There are a equal distribution of crashes throughout the year. Most accidents oc curred on Fridays followed by Saturdays and then Mondays. Most occurred between 18h00 and mid night, and the next highest number occurred in the morning between 09h00 and 12h00. Most accidents with fatal and non-fatal injuries occurred between 18h00 and midnight, thus accidents tend to be more severe in the early evening and at night.
· Ages: The vast majority of the drivers killed or injured were between 25 and 49 years of age, thus a high number of economically active people were killed, injured or disabled. Also, a number of pas sengers were seriously injured.
· Vehicle types: Regarding the types of vehicles involved in acci dents, the majority were motor cars, and the next most common types were light delivery vehicles, sedan taxis and minibuses, in that order.
· Gravel/tarred roads: Accidents do not occur often on poorer (e.g. gravel) roads as drivers tend to be more careful, whereas on good (tarred) roads they tend to be more re laxed, thus carelessness, negligence and speeding are signifi cant causes of accidents. However, in ru ral areas there are many collisions with animals due to carelessness, negligence or speeding.
· Traffi c offi cer visibility: A lack of traffi c offi cers at dangerous or accident-prone spots is a contributing factor as drivers are more cautious where a traffi c offi cer is visible. A comparison of accident numbers in the morning when offi cers are present versus the evening when they have left these spots indicates that their vis ibility is vital.
Decade of Action.indd 1Decade of Action.indd 1 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.2
· Pedestrians & cyclists: Many pedestrians were knocked down while crossing the road, which points primarily to drivers’ disre gard or ignorance of road signs and/or pedestrians’ negligence or lack of knowledge of road use. Unescorted young children crossing streets at random is a major cause of pedestrian accidents. Of the total population injured in road accidents, 1.4%, pedestrians were fatally injured and of the 87 pedal cyclists injured, 5.8 were fa tally injured.
· Accident types: The most severe accidents in terms of the average number of casualties is the single-vehicle overturn, in which vehicle occupants are more likely than in any other type of accident to suffer serious or fatal injuries. Of all those killed in road accidents 36% were killed in this type of accident.
1.2 Namibia Road Safety Strategy (2009-2030)
The 5 year Road Safety Strategy that was launched in 2009 has been structured around the following outcomes:
i) Safer Road Users,
ii) Safer Roads,
iii) Safer Vehicles,
iv) Improved trauma and emergency care, and
v) Improved legal, judicial and administrative arrangements.
It recognised the importance of liaison between key stakeholders, including government departments, private sector organisations, local authorities, communities, as well as profi t and non-profi t making organisations.
Envisaged programmes include among others strategies to improve road safety through education and communication, community participation, traffi c enforcement, driver and vehicle quality, legislation, trauma and emergency care. Attending all these programmes is the need for proper organisational set up to drive the process of coordination.
The Strategy was developed at the time when road safety management has evolved drastically to the extent that adjustments to the traditional way of doing business became inevitable. To this end, evidence-based approaches were viewed in a safe systems approach to be the best operational model with further refi nement to provide a fi rm foundation for road safety improvement in Namibia.
1.3 Global Plan for DoA
As an active member of the United Nations, Namibia have been participating in many UN/WHO sponsored conferences on road safety. The country have followed with keen interest the outcome of the various platforms on road safety globally. Among the notable ones, Namibia attended the African Ministers of Transport and Health Conference which was held in Accra, Ghana in 2007 followed by the Dares Salaam, Tanzania Conference as well as the Moscow Global Ministerial Conference in Russia in 2009. All these conferences produced resolutions that oblige the country to put in place responding programmes and projects.
The DoA was agreed upon as means to marshal world support and meaningful action towards stabilizing and then reduce road traffi c related fatalities being experienced globally, especially in low to middle income countries who only account for a very small percentage of the world’s vehicle population. It is estimated that ninety percent of the global road traffi c deaths occur in low- and middle- income countries.
The Ministry of Works and Transport, as the portfolio ministry responsible for road safety, obtained Cabinet endorsement of the Moscow Declaration, thus paving the way for its full implementation in Namibia as per the Cabinet Decision number 4th/09.03.10/006).
The advent of the DoA necessitated the realignment of the Namibia Road Safety Strategy so as to allow synchronization of activities, resource optimization and to eliminate the possibility of running parallel programmes.
Decade of Action.indd 2Decade of Action.indd 2 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 3
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
2. HIGH LEVEL STATEMENTSVision:
The Vision is:“The safety of all road users is ensured and all necessary efforts are taken towards preventing traffi c deaths and
injuries”
Mission:The Mission is:
“To make Namibia’s road network one of the safest in Africa”
Core Values:Core values are the non-negotiable style in which Namibia will execute this plan, the style in which all will travel on the journey to realise our road safety vision. The seven Core Values & Principles, are
1. Road accidents are Preventable:
The fact that traffi c accidents happen and that the nation experiences the associated trauma shall not be accepted as inevitable. Road accidents don’t just happen; they are caused and thus preventable.
2. Preservation of human life is above everything else:
The priority given to road safety shall refl ect the high value that the nation, as per article 6 of the constitution, places on the preservation of human life and the prevention of serious injury.
3. Total Involvement of the community:
The community at large has an essential role in the development of a positive approach to safe road use.
4. Collaboration:
The multi-disciplinary nature of road safety makes collaboration and partnerships the cornerstone of the road safety strategy. The strategy can only be implemented through interdependent partnerships between government, communities and civil society.
5. Capacity enhancement:
The road safety strategy can only be successful if practitioners have the skills and resources to implement programmes. The road safety strategy supports increased investment in institution building, in education and training of offi cials and communities and investment in resources to sustain the vision.
6. Sustainability:
The road safety strategy has a long-term vision which necessitates the implementation of sustainable programmes, built on realistic funding mechanisms.
7. Socio-economic development:
Road safety programmes will promote development activities in communities, to support the country’s vision of improving the quality of life of its citizens. Civil society will be encouraged to take ownership of road safety problems in the community.
Decade of Action.indd 3Decade of Action.indd 3 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.4
3. STRATEGIC THEMES Generally Strategic Themes are the few priority or focus area in which an organisation has to perform to achieve its vision, based on its mandate. Strategic Themes could be regarded as the main components of the organisation’s strategy. These ‘areas’ are sometimes referred to as goals, high level objectives, clusters of related objectives or key result areas (KRAs). Typically Themes are formed around broad service areas, based on the organisation’s mandate.
The Themes, 6 in number, chosen for Road Safety in Namibia are depicted in the form of a Wheel. This ‘Wheel’ is made up of the 6 main components as shown in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Road Safety Strategy Wheel with Strategic Themes
Figure 1 tells us that if Namibia wishes to achieve its road safety vision, it has to perform in these 6 Themes or ‘wheel components.
Decade of Action.indd 4Decade of Action.indd 4 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 5
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
The six Themes are described as follows:
A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENTThis is the centre of the ‘wheel’ and represents the functions of the Lead Agency. Being the centre of the wheel, this area’s function is mainly that of holding the wheel together, making sure all other components are working well together as one wheel and that the movement or progress is as required. For progress to be recorded in this area there is need for public confi rmation by the portfolio or line Ministry of the role assigned to the NRSC in this regard and acknowledgement by all stakeholders.
B: EDUCATIONThis theme could be regarded as the fi rst or main component of the ‘wheel’. This is at this point where the wheel starts to roll. In this Theme the general public and specifi c groups, such as drivers, taxis or school children, are educated in road safety and trained in specifi c road safety skills. All types of road users are educated on road safety practices and requirements as recorded in policies, legislation and procedures. The purpose of education is to change mindsets, attitudes and behaviours, to create a deep-rooted culture of road safety.
C: ENFORCEMENTIn this Theme capacity and operations are put in place to enforce compliance to legislation, regulations and standards. This Theme enforces education efforts in a way that road users experience application of what has been learned. Due to penalties and incentives, road users are motivated to change their behaviour towards safer road practices. Enforcement should be applied in a consequent and corruption-free manner.
D. ENGINEERING: VEHICLESThis Theme promotes safe vehicles – in terms of roadworthiness, safe design features and compliance to technical and loading standards.
E: ENGINEERING: ROADSIn this Theme safe roads are provided through good surfaces, forgiving road environments, road signs and markings. It involves the phases from planning, design, construction, rehabilitation to maintenance.
F: EMERGENCY RESPONSEAs Themes B-E attempt to prevent accidents, this Theme responds to those accidents that could not be prevented. It starts with the early notifi cation of accidents, the early treatment at the accident site, to hospital treatment and rehabilitation of accident victims. The purpose is to save lives and assist the injured to be taken up in the communities and the economy as soon as possible.
The following table compares the Themes of this DoA Strategy with the Pillar in the Global Plan and Focal Areas of the Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009-2014.
This Namibia DoA Strategy (Themes) Global Plan DoA (Pillars)
Namibia Road Safety Strategy (Functional Programme Area/
Focal Areas)
Theme A: Road Safety Management
Pillar 1: Road safety ManagementArea E: Administration, Research
and Legislation
Theme B: EducationPillar 4: Safer road Users
Area A: Safer People - Improved road user behaviourTheme C: Enforcement
Theme D. Engineering: Vehicles Pillar 3: Safer vehicles Area B: Safer Vehicles
Theme E: Engineering: Roads Pillar 2: Safer roads & mobility Area C: Safer Roads
Theme F: Emergency Response Pillar 5: Post-crash Response Area D: Trauma Response
Decade of Action.indd 5Decade of Action.indd 5 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.6
4. OBJECTIVES & STRATEGY MAP 4.1 Objectives
A total of 18 objectives were identifi ed through the consultation process. The hypothesis is that if the NRSC follows this path, by achieving these 18 objectives in the 6 Themes, it will realise its vision. The 18 selected strategic objectives are listed and described below.
THEME A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENTA1. Capacitated Lead Institution with good Synergy
A2. Supportive & harmonised policy and legal frameworks
A3. Integrated MIS & Performance Management
THEME B: EDUCATIONB1. Capacitated Education Institutions with good Synergy
B2. Well Informed & Educated Public & Road Users
B3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D
THEME C: ENFORCEMENTC1. Capacitated Traffi c Law Enforcement Institutions with good Synergy
C2. Appropriate Processes & Technology for Offence Detection, Charging & Prosecution
C3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D
THEME D. ENGINEERING: VEHICLESD1. Capacitated Institutions with good Synergy
D2. Safer & More Road Worthy Vehicles
D3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D
THEME E: ENGINEERING: ROADSE1. Capacitated Institutions with good Synergy
E2. Safer Roads
E3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D
THEME F: EMERGENCY RESPONSEF1. Capacitated Emergency Institutions with good Synergy
F2. Effective & Effi cient Rescue, Treatment & Rehabilitation Operations
F3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D
4.2. Strategy Map
The strategy map is a model of value creation through cause-and-effect linkages among the strategic objectives in the various Themes. The identifi ed 6 Themes are ‘populated’ with objectives, the building blocks or value drivers of strategy. Strategy mapping forms an integral part of strategic planning and the BSC. It is sometimes called a ‘value creation map’ or ‘success map’. The strategy map links the various strategic objectives together in a very clear manner for everybody to understand.
Decade of Action.indd 6Decade of Action.indd 6 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 7
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
For the road safety strategy the strategy map is in the form of a wheel, depicting the dynamic nature of wheels rolling on Namibian roads. The strategy map in Figure 2 shows how the six themes make up the wheel and how themes and objectives are dependent on one another, how they support one another to move the wheel towards safer roads for all.
Figure 3 on page 8 overleaf depicts the accountabilities for each of the objectives.
Figure 2: Namibia DoA Strategy Wheel with 6 Themes and 19 Objectives
Decade of Action.indd 7Decade of Action.indd 7 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.8
A. Road SafetyManagement Outputs &
OutcomesOutcomes
1. Socio -Economic –
Environmental Results
Managementg1. Capacitated Lead Institution with good
Synergy
3. Integrated MIS & Performance Mgt
Synergyy gy
3. Supportive & harmonised policy and
legal frameworks
tyt
NRSC/MWT
MWT/RA
MOE/NRSC
MoHSS/MVAF
NamPol/RA/LA
Figure 3: Accountabilities per Objective
Decade of Action.indd 8Decade of Action.indd 8 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 9
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
5. UNDERSTANDING THE SCORECARD5.1 Scorecard Components
The Road Safety Scorecard takes the strategy map and gives it more detail. The Scorecard is therefore the detailed implementation strategy. The Scorecard includes the following:
· The 6 themes
· The 18 objectives with their priorities and accountabilities
· Performance Indicators (PIs) and Targets for each objective
· Initiatives with their priorities and responsibilities
· Cost estimates of all initiatives (expected total cost over the 10 year period)
· Scheduling of these initiatives over the 10 year period (Note that year 1 is 2011)
The Scorecard (for 2011 – 2020) is presented in Annexure A. Note that the objectives refer to the strategy map in Figure 2 and use the same colours.
5.2 Defi ning good Performance Indicators (PIs)
A performance indicator (PI) is a performance metric that will refl ect progress against an objective. The PI and its target should be regarded as part of the objective, making it measurable. A PI is an agreed indicator to be used to determine progress made, or the lack thereof, towards achieving each objective. A PI must be quantifi able to track progress. To develop meaningful PIs, one has to understand desired inputs and the processes that are used to produce outputs and eventually outcomes (IPOO). Leading indicators are predictors of future performance and lagging indicators are outcomes. PIs are used by organisations to measure individual staff member, Unit and overall organisational performance.
Objectives and their PIs need to be SMART: Specifi c, Measurable, Agreed to, Realistic & Time-bound. Each objective should therefore have at least one PI, but preferably not more than three (to prevent complexity). Each PI should have a unit of measurement and a target. PIs could be classifi ed in terms of TCQQ – Time (date/duration/frequency), Cost (N$), Quality (Satisfaction index or %) and/or Quantity (number or %).
5.3 Targets & Benchmarking
A target is a quantifi able standard for each indicator. Performance targets are the expected levels or standards of performance to be reached within specifi c timeframes for each objective. Targets help the organisation to monitor progress towards objectives and communicate expectations for units and the organisation.
Targets have to be challenging and be raised over time, but to remain achievable. Initially targets may be estimated guesses, but over time these targets have to conform to best practices by comparing what are the benchmark targets in the industry. Industry refers to similar types of services offered by others in the region or globally.
Benchmarking is a systematic, deliberate and thorough search for best practices that would lead to performance improvement when adapted in your organisation. The benchmarking process is therefore a systematic learning
Decade of Action.indd 9Decade of Action.indd 9 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.10
process to close the performance gap. It involves planning, data collection, analysis and design, implementation, monitoring and adjustment. It provides PIs and targets as tools to identify ineffi ciencies and to improve business processes. The appropriateness of benchmarks should be reviewed in the performance verifi cation process.
5.4 Initiatives
Objectives (targets for the PIs) are achieved through initiatives or projects. Initiatives are defi ned as current and future activities or projects to help ensure the organisation meets the performance targets, as stated in the PIs and Targets for each Objective. Initiatives drive strategic performance. Initiatives are not ends in themselves, but means by which strategic objectives are achieved.
Initiatives require resources, incl. fi nancial, human and structural. These normally need to be managed by means of project management principles, tools and techniques. It is therefore important to measure initiative progress through project management tools and techniques.
The challenge is to choose the right projects or best projects to achieve the strategic objectives. Initiatives are prioritised, because of limited capacity at any stage. Resources should be applied towards the highest value projects. A well-defi ned process for project selection and prioritisation would be required to maximise the chances of projects contributing to the achievement of these strategic objectives.
The choice of projects normally starts with the listing of all current, approved and proposed projects. This is then followed by the mapping of these projects on a grid – to determine which projects could contribute the most to achieve the chosen strategic objectives. The grid will show gaps as well as duplications of projects per objective. Projects should be chosen to support all objectives in a balanced way – to prevent too many projects per objective as well as no projects per objective. The following process is normally used to prioritise strategic initiatives (projects):
1. Create criteria (for both weighting and scoring) to be used in evaluating strategic initiatives;
2. Create a common format (business case) to review the strategic initiatives for prioritisation;
3. Evaluate and prioritise the strategic initiatives using the stated criteria and business case;
4. Prioritise initiatives with the leadership team.
An example of criteria with their weights is: Strategic importance (40%); Cost (15%); Duration (15%) and Interdependence of initiatives (15%); Risk (15%). Initiatives with the highest scores are then selected and included in the Scorecard.
The methodology followed in the selection of the initiatives in this strategic plan, was to fi rstly choose the major strategic projects and then to prioritise these in terms of importance/ value and urgency. These strategic initiatives per Objective are listed in Annexure A.
Only short descriptions of the initiatives are provided in the Scorecard. Note that a detailed project plan has to be developed for each initiative before implementation.
Note that bold numbers in brackets appearing behind some initiatives, e.g. (E1) refer to the projects in the Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009 – 2014.
Decade of Action.indd 10Decade of Action.indd 10 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 11
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
6. COSTING AND BUDGETINGThe initiatives, as described in the Scorecard (Annexure A) require resources – human, physical, structural and fi nancial resources. The total cost estimates are indicated in the scorecards in thousands of N$ (000’s) and are the total costs for the 10 year period – from 2011 to 2020.
To ensure a realistic strategic plan, these resources should be made available. Should resources be lacking, initiatives indicated by Priority 1 should receive preference.
Figure 4 below shows that the total strategic budget for this 10 year period is approximately N$747 million. The average total annual amount required to realise all initiatives in all Themes is approximately N$75 million. The total annual budgets vary from N$90 million in Year 1 to N$70 million in the later years. Themes B, C and F require the majority of all funding.
TOTAL N$ [000s] Theme Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y0112 900 A 14 920 14 331 13 981 9 781 10 281 9 981 9 781 9 781 9 781 10 281 152 800 B 18 850 18 450 18 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 550 223 500 C 23 550 23 550 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 35 800 D 4 600 4 400 4 200 3 200 3 200 3 400 3 200 3 200 3 200 3 200 83 400 E 8 740 8 740 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240
138 500 F 19 017 19 017 14 017 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350
746 900 TOTAL 89 677 88 488 80 738 70 471 69 371 69 271 70 471 68 871 68 871 70 671
Figure 4: Total Namibia DoA Strategy Budget
The annual costs above are approximately double that of the annual budgets in the approved NRSS. It should be noted that the above strategic budget includes road safety element in budgets of MWT, MoHSS, MoE, MVAF and other ministries and organisations.
Note that these are just cost estimates and will have to be verifi ed in future. When project plans are developed per initiative/project, these costs will be verifi ed / improved.
Decade of Action.indd 11Decade of Action.indd 11 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.12
The total annual costs of all strategic initiatives in the 6 Themes are illustrated in Figure 5 below.
Figure 5: Annual Strategic Budget requirement per Theme
Decade of Action.indd 12Decade of Action.indd 12 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 13
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Figures 6 & 7 below clearly show that Themes B, C and F require the majority of funding.
Figure 6: Annual cost distribution of the 6 Themes
Figure 7: Total cost distribution amongst the 6 Themes over the 10 year period
Decade of Action.indd 13Decade of Action.indd 13 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.14
7. CSFS FOR SUCCESSFUL STRATEGY EXECUTION This section highlights the critical success factors (CSFs) for successful strategy execution. The NRSC as Lead Agency for road safety in Namibia is accountable for the execution of this strategy. Without the following critical building blocks in place (see Figure 8), it would be diffi cult to successfully implement this Strategic Plan:
· Vision: A clear purpose and direction, continuously reinforced by strong leadership. Both compelling vision (safer roads) and burning platform (current accidents, injuries and deaths) inspire people to move. With regard to leadership political buy-in is critical together with the need to raise the profi le/status of the Lead Agency.
· Urgency: A need to act now and not delay.
· Capabilities: Suffi cient and capable staff with needed facilities and equipment is needed. Additional staff and skills are required.
· Incentives: To succeed, all SHs should perceive a benefi t or incentive for them to participate and contribute in executing this strategic plan.
· Resources: Suffi cient fi nancial resources are needed to implement all the initiatives.
· Action Plan: Detailed and well communicated action plans/project plans are needed to ensure all SHs know what to do day-by-day. Annual (Operational) Plans should be developed from the scorecards in this strategic plan. Projects/initiatives should only be executed after proper planning. The fi ve project management processes are initiation (in strategic planning), planning, execution, control and close-out. Project management training is recommended to manage the nine knowledge areas of scope, time, cost, quality, HR, communication, risk, procurement and integration management over these 5 processes.
Figure 8: Critical elements of change management
Strategy execution (STRATEX) is a discipline on its own and requires the MERIL-D elements of Measure, Evaluate, Report, Improve, Learn – all around Drive (motivation) and Dialogue, as depicted in Figure 9. This can be regarded as a performance management system. The MERIL-D cycle should be regular, preferably quarterly, but at least bi-annually, to provide a link between the vision (the sun), strategic objectives and projects in the strategic plan. See again the central position of project management.
Decade of Action.indd 14Decade of Action.indd 14 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 15
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
A system is required to help NRSC and its partners to execute the strategy, to track actual performance and to be able to make the right decisions for continuous improvement on is journey towards achieving the strategic objectives and vision. One of the current weaknesses is the lack of proper baselines. These baselines have to be established during the fi rst year of execution.
Figure 9: STRATEX by MERIL-D [Olivier 2010]
Decade of Action.indd 15Decade of Action.indd 15 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.16
Theme Committees:Theme Committees (TC) concept is central to this strategy.
A TC should be elected in each of the 6 themes. Each TC should consist of approximately 8 representatives from the theme industry. The TC’s key functions are planning and performance management of the theme objectives and initiatives/projects. Figure 10 below depicts how the six TCs will meet.
Figure 10: Operation of Theme Committees
Without such a structure and system, NRSC as lead agency would not be able to implement the DoA for road safety strategy. It is envisaged that each meeting would span 2-3 days.
Costs for the functioning of all these TCs are included under Theme A. TCs however should manage the costs of the Theme initiatives.
The lead agency (NRSC) should lead the Theme A Committee, but should also be part of the other 5 TCs.
Decade of Action.indd 16Decade of Action.indd 16 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 17
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
ANNE
XURE
A: NA
MIBIA
DOA S
CORE
CARD
THEM
E A:
ROA
D SA
FETY
MAN
AGEM
ENT
[PIL
LAR
1]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
1.
Capa
cita
ted
Lead
Ag
ency
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
2
NRSC
a)
No
of s
taff
in L
ead
Agen
cy
b)
Polit
ical
will
and
fi nan
cial
sup
port
as
mea
sure
d by
% o
f in
itiat
ives
in th
is Pl
an
fund
ed
c)
% o
f inf
rast
ruct
ure
inve
stm
ent u
tilize
d fo
r roa
d sa
fety,
as
mea
sure
d by
N$
spen
t on
this
Plan
/ To
tal N
$ sp
ent o
n ro
ad
infra
stru
ctur
e
[N$1
20 –
150
–170
m
ill ne
eded
in Y
r 1]
BL=
8Y1
= 16
Y2=
25Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
TB
DY1
= 80
%Y2
= 80
%Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
0.1
%Y1
= 10
%Y2
= 10
%Y3
= 10
%Y4
= 10
%Y5
= 10
%Y6
= 10
%Y7
= 10
%Y8
= 10
%Y9
= 10
%Y0
= 10
%
1.
Stru
ctur
al R
efor
m: E
stab
lish
a Le
ad
Road
Saf
ety
Agen
cy w
ith s
ecre
taria
t, ba
sed
on s
uppo
rtive
pol
icy
and
legi
slatio
n (E
1)
1Y
MW
TN
RSC
GTZ
MoJ
J12
000
XX
X
2.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Ref
orm
th
e RF
A; d
evel
op &
impl
emen
t pr
oced
ures
for e
ffect
ive &
effi
cien
t al
loca
tion
of re
sour
ces
to in
itiat
ives/
proj
ects
; im
plem
ent a
n in
nova
tive
fund
ing
mec
hani
sm
2N
MW
TR
FAS
0X
X
3.
Hum
an re
sour
ces:
Dev
elop
a
capa
city
dev
elop
men
t pla
n ba
sed
on
capa
city
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t for
the
Lead
Age
ncy
1N
NR
SCM
WT.
O20
0X
X
4.
Hum
an re
sour
ces:
Bui
ld h
uman
ca
paci
ty a
ccor
ding
to p
lan
– th
roug
h st
affi n
g an
d sk
ills d
evel
opm
ent/
train
ing
1N
NR
SCM
WT
O10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Est
ablis
h sp
ecia
l acc
iden
t inv
estig
atio
n un
its
(E3.
3)
2N
NR
SCN
Pol
LA GIZ
J0
XX
6.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Dev
elop
ap
prop
riate
sta
ndar
ds a
nd
proc
edur
es, i
ncl.
non
cum
bers
ome
judi
cial
pro
cess
es a
nd p
rom
otio
n of
IS
O 39
001
stan
dard
1Y
NR
SCM
WT
NSI
MoJ
S10
0X
XX
7.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Dev
elop
pro
ject
an
d bu
sines
s pl
ans/
case
s wh
ere
need
ed fo
r im
prov
ed fu
ndin
g
2N
NR
SCM
WT
S10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
8.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: A
cqui
re fa
cilit
ies,
ve
hicl
es, e
quip
men
t and
mat
eria
ls fo
r Le
ad A
genc
y
1N
RA
RFA
S50
0X
X
Decade of Action.indd 17Decade of Action.indd 17 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.18
9.
Mon
etar
y re
sour
ces:
Incr
ease
and
su
stai
n fu
ndin
g to
fund
initi
ative
s of
th
is st
rate
gic
plan
; rec
omm
end
core
an
nual
and
med
ium
ter
m b
udge
tary
ta
rget
s; in
vest
igat
e so
urce
s of
fund
ing
from
fees
, lev
ies,
RFA
, fi n
es, d
onor
s &
spon
sors
hips
(E6)
1N
NR
SCR
AR
FAM
WT
GR
SP
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
10.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: B
uild
&
mai
ntai
n go
od re
latio
ns, a
llianc
es
and
partn
ersh
ips
(loca
l, re
gion
al a
nd
inte
rnat
iona
l) ; e
stab
lish
coor
dina
tion
mec
hani
sms
with
all
SHs;
est
ablis
h co
ordi
natio
n gr
oups
/ The
me
com
mitt
ees
1Y
NR
SCR
AS
500
XX
X
11.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: S
uppo
rt an
d pa
rtici
pate
in G
loba
l Roa
d Sa
fety
Ac
tiviti
es (s
ee G
loba
l Pla
n, p
16)
1Y
MW
TR
AJ
3000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Supp
ortiv
e an
d ha
rmon
ised
po
licy
and
lega
l fra
mew
orks
2
NRSC C
a)
Enab
ling/
supp
ortiv
e an
d ha
rmon
ized
polic
y an
d le
gal f
ram
ewor
ks/
judi
cial
env
ironm
ent –
as
mea
sure
d by
?
BL=
TB
DY1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
Nee
ds a
sses
smen
t: As
sess
nee
d fo
r im
prov
ed p
olic
y an
d le
gal f
ram
ewor
ks
for i
mpr
oved
road
saf
ety
– in
all
Them
es (E
1)
1N
NR
SCM
oJM
WT
400
XX
2.
Polic
y de
velo
pmen
t: De
velo
p /
upda
te a
nd d
issem
inat
e po
licie
s ac
cord
ing
to p
lan
(E1)
1Y
RA
All
J20
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
3.
Legi
slat
ion
deve
lopm
ent:
Deve
lop
/ up
date
and
diss
emin
ate
legi
slatio
n &
regu
latio
ns a
ccor
ding
to p
lan,
incl
. sp
eed
and
alc
ohol
lim
its (E
1)
1Y
MW
TAl
lJ
5000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 18Decade of Action.indd 18 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 19
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
3.
Inte
grat
ed M
IS
& Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
NRSC S
a)
INTE
GRAT
ED M
IS o
n ro
ad s
afet
y, lin
ked
with
al
l The
mes
, in
pla
ce,
shar
ed a
nd p
rope
rly
utilis
ed fo
r dec
ision
-m
akin
g
b)
Valu
e of
INTE
GRAT
ED
road
saf
ety
info
rmat
ion
syst
em fo
r dec
ision
m
akin
g
BL=
TB
DY1
= 75
%Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
MIS
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t: Do
in
form
atio
n ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent f
or
deve
lopi
ng a
n in
tegr
ated
Roa
d Sa
fety
M
IS a
t the
Lea
d Ag
ency
; ass
ess
all
data
base
s an
d de
velo
p fu
nctio
nal
requ
irem
ents
for m
gt re
ports
; inc
l. ac
cide
nt M
IS (E
2.1)
(E3)
1N
NR
SCTC
sO
500
X
2.
Inte
grat
ed M
IS: D
evel
op &
mai
ntai
n a
natio
nal i
nteg
rate
d M
IS, l
inki
ng
with
MIS
’s in
oth
er T
hem
es, i
ncl.
data
of a
ccid
ents
, inj
urie
s, d
eath
s,
road
con
ditio
ns, v
ehic
le c
ondi
tions
, em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
, edu
catio
n,
enfo
rcem
ent.
[IPOO
]; Im
prov
e qu
ality
/com
plet
enes
s of
all
data
/ in
form
atio
n (E
2.2,
E3)
1Y
NR
SC
MoH
SSN
Pol
MoJ RA GIZ
O30
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Them
e M
IS’s:
Sup
port
with
the
esta
blish
men
t of l
ocal
/ Th
eme
syst
ems
to m
easu
re, e
valu
ate
and
repo
rt on
road
saf
ety
[IPOO
]
1Y
NR
SCN
Pol
J10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
R&D:
Cre
ate
a pl
atfo
rm fo
r the
re
sear
ch, a
nalys
is an
d pu
blic
atio
n of
ro
ad s
afet
y iss
ues;
neg
otia
te w
ith a
nd
supp
ort t
ertia
ry/re
sear
ch in
stitu
tions
fo
r per
iodi
c ro
ad s
afet
y re
sear
ch
(E5)
1Y
NR
SC
UN
AMPo
NN
Col
NPo
lM
WT
J20
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Perfo
rman
ce m
gt: E
stab
lish
and
revie
w PI
s an
d ta
rget
s in
this
stra
tegi
c pl
an, c
onsid
erin
g be
nchm
arks
1Y
RA
NPo
lS
500
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
: Est
ablis
h Th
eme
A Co
mm
ittee
on
Road
Saf
ety
and
Mee
t ann
ually
in F
eb fo
r pla
nnin
g &
budg
etin
g; W
orks
hop
in A
ugus
t to
eval
uate
per
form
ance
& to
pre
pare
fo
r ann
ual N
atio
nal C
onfe
renc
e in
Oc
tobe
r
1N
NR
SCD
onor
S15
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
Perfo
rman
ce m
gt: D
o re
gula
r M
ERIL
-D o
n al
l the
mes
, stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives,
initi
ative
s1
NR
AN
Pol
J20
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 19Decade of Action.indd 19 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.20
8.
Repo
rting
/com
mun
icat
ion:
Impr
ove
the
diss
emin
atio
n/re
porti
ng o
f all
info
rmat
ion
base
d on
com
mun
icat
ion
man
agem
ent p
lan;
regu
larly
repo
rt/pu
blish
sta
tistic
s/fi n
ding
s; s
hare
re
sear
ch a
nd p
erfo
rman
ce fi
ndin
gs;
prom
ote
dial
ogue
to p
rom
ote
lear
ning
; Com
mun
icat
e/Re
port
annu
al ro
ad s
afet
y pe
rform
ance
af
ter a
nnua
l Nat
iona
l Con
fere
nce
in
Octo
ber t
o GR
N &
UN
/WH
O
1Y
NR
SCM
WT
Don
orJ
5000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
9.
Corru
ptio
n: Id
entif
y an
d ad
dres
s co
rrupt
pra
ctic
es th
roug
h pr
oper
sy
stem
; com
mun
icat
e iss
ues
of
corru
ptio
n to
the
publ
ic (E
4)
1Y
NR
SCN
Pol
All
J50
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
10.
Upd
ate
Plan
s: E
nsur
e th
at th
is St
rate
gy a
nd P
roje
ct /
Initi
ative
Pla
ns
are
regu
larly
upd
ated
and
app
rove
d wi
th c
ontri
butio
ns fr
om a
ll Th
emes
2N
NR
SCTC
sJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
11.
Revi
ews:
Do
Mid
Ter
m R
evie
w in
20
15 a
nd E
nd T
erm
Rev
iew
in 2
020
2N
MW
TO
1000
XX
Decade of Action.indd 20Decade of Action.indd 20 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 21
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
THEM
E B:
EDU
CATI
ON [P
ILLA
R 4]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
1.
Capa
cita
ted
Educ
atio
n In
stitu
tions
with
go
od S
yner
gy
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
Educ
atio
n / t
rain
ing
stak
ehol
ders
incl
.:N
RSC
, MW
T/D
oT, R
A,
MoE
, Sch
ools
, UN
AM,
PoN
, MSS
, LAs
, GR
SP,
NAN
ASO
, NAN
GO
F,
NAB
TA,
MVA
F, M
oHSS
(R
ehab
), N
ABCO
A,
NCC
I, Fi
lling
Sta
tions
, N
amB
rew
Form
al, I
nfor
mal
, Ca
mpa
igns
2
NRSC C
a)
Staf
f cap
acity
– b
ased
on
no
of tr
aine
es
train
ed in
Roa
d Sa
fety
(in
all
inst
itutio
ns)
b)
Secu
red
fund
ing
for
road
saf
ety
educ
atio
n by
NRS
C, R
A [N
$ m
illion
]
c)
% o
f req
uire
d fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed to
exe
cute
Th
eme
B in
itiat
ives
for
the
year
BL=
TB
DY1
= ?
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
BL=
TB
DY1
= ?
Y2=
?Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
TB
DY1
= ?
Y2=
?Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
All r
esou
rces
: Dev
elop
a c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
base
d on
cap
acity
ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent
1Y
NR
SCM
oEM
VAF
J90
0X
XX
2.
Hum
an re
sour
ces:
Tra
in T
rain
ers/
Offi c
ials
in v
ario
us in
stitu
tions
– in
cl.
form
al e
duca
tion
and
shor
t cou
rses
/pr
epar
atio
n of
cam
paig
ns; e
stab
lish
road
saf
ety
orie
ntat
ion
prog
ram
mes
fo
r all
offi c
ials
invo
lved
in ro
ad s
afet
y an
d bu
ild th
e ca
paci
ty o
f tra
ffi c
polic
e of
fi cer
s (A
6)
1Y
NR
SCN
Pol
RA
MVA
FG
IZ
J15
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Hum
an re
sour
ces:
Var
ious
in
stitu
tions
pro
vide
train
ing,
incl
. tra
inin
g of
com
mun
ities
in e
mer
genc
y re
spon
se a
nd fi
rst a
id
1Y
NR
SCAl
lSH
sJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: E
stab
lish
a ro
ad
safe
ty p
ark
(inst
itutio
n) fo
r tra
inin
g th
e pu
blic
on
road
saf
ety
2Y
NR
SCM
WT
MoE
MLG
J12
000
XX
X
5.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: A
cqui
re a
mob
ile
unit
for t
he R
oad
Safe
ty P
ark
2Y
NR
SCM
WT
MoE
MLG
J20
00X
X
6.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: D
evel
op,
repr
oduc
e an
d di
strib
ute
train
ing
mat
eria
ls on
road
saf
ety,
incl
. to
be
used
for T
oT
1N
RSC
MoE
J40
00X
XX
X
7.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: B
uild
&
mai
ntai
n go
od re
latio
ns, a
llianc
es
and
partn
ersh
ips
(loca
l, re
gion
al
and
inte
rnat
iona
l) –
to p
rom
ote
‘one
m
essa
ge’,
coor
dina
ted
educ
atio
n an
d tra
inin
g in
var
ious
sec
tors
1Y
NR
SCM
WT
LA RC
NAN
GN
ANA
J50
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 21Decade of Action.indd 21 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.22
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Wel
l Inf
orm
ed &
Ed
ucat
ed P
ublic
&
Road
Use
rs
1
NRSC C
a)
Road
saf
ety
know
ledg
e by
pub
lic
and
non-
mot
orise
d tra
nspo
rt us
ers
– as
m
easu
red
by?
b)
Know
ledg
e an
d sk
ills o
f driv
ers
and
pass
enge
rs –
as
mea
sure
d by
?
c)
Cultu
re o
f roa
d sa
fety
as
mea
sure
s by
vo
lunt
ary
com
plia
nce?
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
Trai
ning
mat
eria
ls: D
o tra
inin
g ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent a
nd d
evelo
p ed
ucat
ion
and
train
ing
plan
/ pr
ogra
mm
e wi
th
mat
erial
s (in
cl. re
gular
revie
w of
ef
fect
ivene
ss)
1Y
NR
SCM
oFM
VAF
NAN
GN
ANA
J12
00X
XX
X
2.
Educ
atio
n th
e pu
blic
acc
ordi
ng to
Pl
an: I
mpl
emen
t the
LT C
omm
unica
tion
Plan
–in
cl. a
ll typ
es o
f edu
catio
n an
d ca
mpa
igns;
incl.
dea
ling
with
ex
haus
tion
/ tire
dnes
s, sto
ppag
es a
long
the
road
, han
dlin
g of
car
bre
akag
es ,
the
Poor
trip
plan
ning
& p
repa
ratio
ns,
hand
ling
of va
rious
illne
sses
and
di
sabi
lities
, ta
xi dr
iving
skills
, drin
king
and
drug
s, ag
gres
sive
beha
viour
, red
lig
ht o
ffenc
es, s
afet
y belt
s, sp
eedi
ng,
impa
ired
/ dist
ract
ed d
rivin
g, in
cl. u
se
of c
ell p
hone
s, vu
lner
able
road
use
rs,
non-
mot
orise
d tra
nspo
rt us
ers,
incl.
the
use
of h
elmet
s (A4
)
1Y
NR
SCN
BC
MVA
FM
oJG
IZM
HS
MIC
T M
oE LAN
ANG
NAN
A
J35
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Colla
bora
te w
ith c
omm
uniti
es to
im
plem
ent r
oad
safe
ty at
com
mun
ity
level
thro
ugh
netw
ork
of c
omm
unity
fo
rum
s thr
ough
LA/
RC st
ruct
ures
(A
2.2,
A5)
1Y
NR
SCR
C LAN
ANG
NAN
AM
LGN
Pol
J10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
Scho
ol e
duca
tion:
Inte
grat
e ro
ad sa
fety
into
the
scho
ol cu
rricu
lum
, im
plem
ent
Juni
or T
raffi
c Tr
ainin
g Ce
ntre
s &
Scho
lar P
atro
ls (A
1)
1Y
NR
SCM
oEH
PSI
LAN
ANA
J20
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Impl
emen
t Saf
e Ro
utes
to S
choo
l pr
ogra
mm
e (A
2)1
YN
RSC
RA LA Com
MoE
J50
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Road
safe
ty a
t wor
k: P
rovid
e ro
ad
safe
ty tra
inin
g in
the
work
env
ironm
ent;
Safe
ty/OH
S law
s, sta
ndar
ds &
rules
for
safe
ope
ratio
n of
com
mer
cial f
reigh
t an
d tra
nspo
rt ve
hicle
s, pa
ssen
ger
road
tran
spor
t veh
icles
and
priv
ate
fl eet
s to
redu
ce c
rash
inju
ries;
prov
ide
guid
eline
s and
wor
ksho
ps (A
3)
1Y
NR
SCM
LSW
MVA
FM
oEG
RSP
Priv
O50
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 22Decade of Action.indd 22 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 23
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
7.
Driv
er in
stru
ctio
n an
d te
stin
g:
Cont
rol d
river
inst
ruct
ion
and
test
ing;
re
gula
te d
rivin
g sc
hool
s th
roug
h ac
cred
itatio
n sy
stem
; rev
ise te
stin
g sy
stem
& m
ater
ials;
est
ablis
h dr
iver
test
ing
insp
ecto
rate
(A7)
1Y
NR
SCR
AN
DI
MW
TN
Pol
LA RFA
MoJ
GIZ
J20
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
8.
Publ
ic tr
ansp
ort:
Impr
ove
the
safe
ty
of p
ublic
tran
spor
t thr
ough
tran
spor
t pe
rmit
data
base
and
con
trol,
drive
r tra
inin
g, a
ccre
dita
tion
& aw
ards
, pu
blic
tran
spor
t saf
ety
plan
s, s
afet
y m
gt s
yste
ms
& ro
adwo
rthin
ess
(A8)
1Y
MW
TR
AN
RSC
NAB
TLA Pr
iv
J20
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
3.
Good
MIS
, Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t and
R&
D in
Edu
catio
n
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
NRSC, MWT, NRSCC
a)
MIS
on
road
saf
ety
educ
atio
n in
pla
ce,
shar
ed a
nd p
rope
rly
utilis
ed fo
r dec
ision
-m
akin
g
b)
Valu
e of
road
saf
ety
educ
atio
n in
form
atio
n fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
R&D:
Res
earc
h, d
evel
op a
nd
prom
ote
com
preh
ensiv
e po
licie
s an
d pr
actic
es to
redu
ce w
ork-
rela
ted
road
traf
fi c in
jurie
s in
all
sect
ors,
in
supp
ort o
f int
erna
tiona
lly re
cogn
ised
stan
dard
s fo
r roa
d sa
fety
mgt
sy
stem
s an
d OH
S
2N
MoE
NR
SCJ
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
2.
Grad
uate
Driv
er L
icen
sing
Sys
tem
: In
vest
igat
e th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f Gr
adua
te D
river
Lic
ensin
g Sy
stem
s fo
r nov
ice
drive
rs
2N
MoE
NR
SCJ
200
X
3.
MIS
: Im
prov
e an
d co
ordi
nate
da
taba
ses
and
MIS
for R
S ed
ucat
ion
2N
MoE
NR
SCJ
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
& P
erf M
gt:
Esta
blish
The
me
B Co
mm
ittee
on
Road
Saf
ety
and
Mee
t ann
ually
in
Feb
for p
lann
ing
& bu
dget
ing;
W
orks
hop
in A
ugus
t to
eval
uate
pe
rform
ance
& to
pre
pare
for a
nnua
l N
atio
nal C
onfe
renc
e in
Oct
ober
2N
NR
SCD
onor
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Perfo
rman
ce m
gt: S
hare
rese
arch
an
d pe
rform
ance
fi nd
ings
; pro
mot
e di
alog
ue to
pro
mot
e le
arni
ng2
NM
oEN
RSC
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Upd
ate
Plan
s: S
trate
gy a
nd P
roje
ct /
Initi
ative
Pla
ns2
NM
oEN
RSC
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 23Decade of Action.indd 23 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.24
THEM
E C:
ENF
ORCE
MEN
T [P
ILLA
R 4]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
1.
Capa
cita
ted
Traf
fi c
Law
Enfo
rcem
ent
Inst
itutio
ns w
ith
good
Syn
ergy
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
, e.
g. te
chno
logy
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
STAK
EHO
LDER
S:N
amPo
l, Co
W C
ity
Polic
e, L
A tra
ffi c
dept
s., R
A, M
oJ w
ith
mag
istra
tes,
MW
T
2
NamPol P
a)
No
of tr
aine
d an
d eq
uipp
ed ro
ad tr
affi c
en
forc
emen
t offi
cers
(o
r per
10,
000
vehi
cle
popu
latio
n)
b)
% o
f req
uire
d fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed to
exe
cute
Th
eme
C in
itiat
ives
for
the
year
c)
No
of d
edic
ated
traf
fi c
cour
ts c
apac
itate
d an
d in
ope
ratio
n
BL=
500
Y1=
525
Y2=
550
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
1500
?Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 25
00
BL=
NA
Y1=
80%
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
BL=
0Y1
= 3
Y2=
6Y3
= 9
Y4=
12Y5
= 14
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
28
1.
All r
esou
rces
: Dev
elop
a c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
base
d on
cap
acity
ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent i
n En
forc
emen
t ‘In
dust
ry’
1N
MW
TAl
lJ
4000
XX
2.
HR:
Acq
uire
/App
oint
mor
e st
aff –
in
all n
eede
d en
forc
emen
t pos
ition
s (in
cl in
cou
rts) –
acc
ordi
ng to
pla
n (c
ontri
bute
20%
)
1Y
MW
TJ
7500
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
HR:
Bui
ld h
uman
cap
acity
acc
ordi
ng
to p
lan
– th
roug
h sk
ills d
evel
opm
ent /
tra
inin
g –
in a
ll en
forc
emen
t asp
ects
1Y
MW
TJ
2000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Impr
ove
the
stru
ctur
e an
d co
ordi
natio
n pr
oced
ures
am
ongs
t Enf
orce
men
t Ag
ents
(A11
.1)
1Y
MW
TJ
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Impr
ove
supp
ortin
g po
licie
s an
d le
gisla
tion
for
effe
ctive
and
effi
cien
t enf
orce
men
t; re
view
and
upda
te le
gisla
tion
and
pena
lties
– in
cl. s
peed
lim
its, c
hild
se
ats,
repe
at o
ffend
ers,
(tee
nage
) al
coho
l drin
king
(A11
.3-5
); de
crim
inal
ise c
erta
in o
ffenc
es a
nd
impl
emen
t adm
in a
djud
icat
ion
syst
em; c
onsid
er p
oint
s de
mer
it sy
stem
(A9.
3); c
onsid
er c
ompu
lsory
tra
inin
g an
d co
mm
unity
ser
vice
for
repe
at o
ffend
ers
(A9.
4), i
ncen
tives
fo
r ear
ly pa
ymen
t
1Y
MoJ
NR
SCN
Pol
MW
TG
IZ
J50
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: A
cqui
re/B
uild
fa
cilit
ies
need
ed fo
r im
prov
ed
enfo
rcem
ent,
incl
. roa
d bl
ocks
and
tra
ffi c
cour
ts (A
9.2)
1Y
MW
TJ
6500
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
7.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: A
cqui
re v
ehic
les,
eq
uipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
need
ed fo
r im
prov
ed e
nfor
cem
ent (
10%
fund
ing
cont
ribut
ion)
1Y
MW
TJ
3000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: B
uild
rela
tions
, al
lianc
es a
nd p
artn
ersh
ips
with
lo
cal,
regi
onal
and
inte
rnat
iona
l en
forc
emen
t ins
titut
ions
2N
MW
TJ
5000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 24Decade of Action.indd 24 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 25
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Appr
opria
te
Proc
esse
s &
Tech
nolo
gy fo
r Of
fenc
e De
tect
ion,
Ch
argi
ng &
Pr
osec
utio
n
1
NamPol, NamPol P
a)
Tota
l num
ber o
f tra
ffi c
viola
tions
in a
ll ca
tego
ries
per a
nnum
b)
% S
ucce
ssfu
l pr
osec
utio
n (p
aym
ent
and
cour
t cas
es) –
for
all c
ateg
orie
s of
traf
fi c
offe
nces
BL=
17
0000
Y1=
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
7000
0
BL=
20%
Y1=
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
80%
1.
Enfo
rcem
ent o
pera
tions
: Im
plem
ent
inte
nsive
, har
mon
ised,
sta
ndar
d an
d ef
fect
ive tr
affi c
ope
ratio
ns/
proc
edur
es; I
mpl
emen
t tra
ffi c
enfo
rcem
ent t
hrou
gh v
ario
us
agen
cies
; Im
prov
e ev
iden
ce
and
proc
esse
s to
redu
ce c
ourt
with
draw
als
(A10
.1-4
)
2Y
NPo
lN
RSC
MW
TLA
J20
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
2.
Tech
nolo
gy: I
ncre
ase
use
of
appr
opria
te te
chno
logy
for o
ffenc
e de
tect
ion
(A10
.5)
1Y
NPo
lN
RSC
MW
TLA
J40
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Visi
bilit
y: Im
prov
e vis
ibilit
y an
d in
spec
tions
by
enfo
rcem
ent o
ffi ce
rs –
ac
cord
ing
to a
ctio
n pl
an1
YN
Pol
All
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
Invo
lve
com
mun
ities
thr
ough
CO
PPS
appr
oach
; m
onth
ly co
mm
unity
mee
tings
per
Zon
e;
Safe
ty C
omm
ittee
s; tr
aini
ng a
nd
feed
back
; nei
ghbo
urho
od w
atch
es –
1N
Pol
LAs
Priv
Com
NG
Os
J10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Ease
of p
aym
ent:
Impr
ove/
simpl
ify
paym
ents
and
pay
poi
nts
by a
gent
s,
e.g.
Pos
t Offi
ces;
pay
men
t lin
ked
to M
IS/p
aym
ent c
odes
– e
stab
lish,
op
erat
e an
d m
aint
ain
1N
Pol
LAAg
ent
J10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 25Decade of Action.indd 25 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.26
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
3.
Good
MIS
, Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t and
R&
D
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
NamPol, NamPol
a)
MIS
in p
lace
, sha
red
and
prop
erly
utilis
ed
for d
ecisi
on-m
akin
g –
all s
yste
ms
inte
grat
ed
into
one
Tra
fman
Sy
stem
, inc
l.
Nam
CIS
(cou
rt sy
stem
), TC
S, N
RSC
Syst
em (R
SIM
S),
E-po
licin
g Sy
stem
lin
ked
to N
aTIS
/ e-
NaT
IS
b)
Valu
e of
enf
orce
men
t in
form
atio
n fo
r de
cisio
n m
akin
g
BL=
NA
Dat
e =
Dec
201
2
BL=
NA
Y1=
70%
Y2=
80%
Y3=
90%
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
1.
Deve
lop
MIS
: Set
up
MIS
(Tra
fman
) an
d in
tegr
ate
with
oth
er s
yste
ms
(A9.
1)1
YN
Pol
MW
TJ
5000
XX
2.
Oper
ate
and
mai
ntai
n th
e M
IS:
(Tra
fman
), in
cl. t
rain
ing
of u
sers
and
lic
ense
fees
(80,
000
pa) (
A9.1
)1
YN
Pol
MW
TJ
8000
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Perfo
rman
ce M
gt: M
easu
re,
Eval
uate
and
Rep
ort r
egul
arly
on a
ll en
forc
emen
t asp
ects
(M/Q
/A)
1Y
NPo
lM
WT
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
R&D:
Do/
prom
ote
R&D
for
cont
inuo
us im
prov
emen
t of
enfo
rcem
ent
2N
TCN
RSC
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Web
site
and
/or n
ewsl
ette
rs:
Esta
blish
, ope
rate
and
mai
ntai
n a
publ
ic in
form
atio
n sh
arin
g pl
atfo
rm
such
as
a we
bsite
and
/or n
ewsle
tters
to
sha
re p
ertin
ent i
nfor
mat
ion
with
of
fi cia
ls an
d th
e pu
blic
(A11
.2)
2N
NR
SCAl
lJ
2000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
& P
erfo
rman
ce
Mgt
: Est
ablis
h Th
eme
B Co
mm
ittee
on
Roa
d Sa
fety
and
Mee
t ann
ually
in
Feb
for p
lann
ing
& bu
dget
ing;
W
orks
hop
in A
ugus
t to
eval
uate
pe
rform
ance
& to
pre
pare
for a
nnua
l N
atio
nal C
onfe
renc
e in
Oct
ober
2N
NR
SCD
onor
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
Perfo
rman
ce M
gt: S
hare
rese
arch
an
d pe
rform
ance
fi nd
ings
; pro
mot
e di
alog
ue to
pro
mot
e le
arni
ng2
NTC
NR
SCJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Upd
ate
Plan
s: S
trate
gy a
nd P
roje
ct /
Initi
ative
Pla
ns2
NTC
NR
SCJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 26Decade of Action.indd 26 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 27
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
THEM
E D:
ENG
INEE
RING
: VEH
ICLE
S [P
ILLA
R 3]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
1.
Capa
cita
ted
Inst
itutio
ns w
ith
good
Syn
ergy
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
2
MWT / RA
a)
Staf
f cap
acity
– b
ased
on
requ
ired
reso
urce
s
b)
% o
f req
uire
d fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed to
exe
cute
Th
eme
D in
itiat
ives
for
the
year
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
All r
esou
rces
: Dev
elop
a c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
for t
he N
amib
ian
vehi
cle
safe
ty in
dust
ry, b
ased
on
capa
city
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t
1N
NR
SCAl
lJ
400
XX
2.
HR:
Impr
ove
staf
fi ng
and
deve
lop
skills
/ tra
in, i
ncl.
train
ing
of v
ehic
le
exam
iner
s of
veh
icle
test
ing
cent
res
and
insp
ecto
rate
and
sta
ff at
NSI
, the
re
gula
tor (
B2.1
);
1Y
NR
SCAl
lJ
5000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Dev
elop
ap
prop
riate
legi
slatio
n, p
olic
ies
and
proc
edur
es, e
.g. l
egisl
ate
min
imum
st
anda
rds
for t
he tr
ansp
ort o
f sc
hola
rs, c
ontra
ctor
s, fa
rm w
orke
rs
and
othe
r vul
nera
ble
grou
ps (B
4);
enac
t law
s th
at p
rohi
bit t
he u
se o
f ve
hicl
es w
ithou
t sea
t bel
ts –
fron
t and
re
ar
1N
NR
SCM
oJN
Pol
J40
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Dev
elop
and
im
plem
ent a
com
preh
ensiv
e ov
erlo
ad
cont
rol s
trate
gy, c
onsid
erin
g cr
oss-
bord
er is
sues
(B5.
1)
2N
RA
MW
TN
Pol
J0?
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Est
ablis
h a
Vehi
cle
Test
ing
Insp
ecto
rate
, bas
ed
on in
stitu
tiona
l req
uire
men
ts, t
o de
velo
p an
d m
aint
ain
min
imum
st
anda
rds
for v
ehic
le te
stin
g ce
ntre
s (B
2) –
refe
r to
NRC
S in
Sou
th A
frica
2Y
NaT
IS
RA
NPo
lLA
sN
RSC
MW
T
J30
00X
XX
6.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Intro
duce
co
ntro
l mea
sure
s ba
sed
on n
ew
tech
nolo
gy (B
6)2
NM
WT
J0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: E
nsur
e th
at re
quire
d fa
cilit
ies,
veh
icle
s,
equi
pmen
t and
mat
eria
ls ar
e ac
quire
d –
acco
rdin
g to
pla
n, in
cl.
NSI
test
ing
faci
litie
s
2N
MW
TAl
l SH
sJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: B
uild
goo
d re
latio
ns, a
llianc
es &
par
tner
ship
s (lo
cal,
regi
onal
& in
tl); p
artic
ipat
e in
the
UN
Wor
ld F
orum
for
Har
mon
izatio
n of
Veh
icle
Reg
ulat
ions
&
appl
y re
leva
nt s
tand
ards
; pa
rtici
pate
in N
CAP
proj
ects
1N
NR
SCM
WT
J20
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 27Decade of Action.indd 27 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.28
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Safe
r & M
ore
Road
W
orth
y Ve
hicl
es o
n ou
r Roa
ds
- De
sign;
Ope
ratio
n;
Mai
nten
ance
- Pu
blic
& P
rivat
e ve
hicl
es
1
MWT / RA
a)
Vehi
cle
safe
ty
as m
easu
red
by
com
plia
nce
to d
esig
n &
cons
truct
ion
stan
dard
s (in
cl. s
afet
y be
lts, a
ir ba
gs, e
tc.)
b)
Com
plia
nce
to
road
wor
thin
ess
requ
irem
ents
c)
Com
plia
nce
of p
ublic
ve
hicl
e ut
ilisat
ion
in te
rms
of lo
ads
[pas
seng
ers
and
axle
lo
ad]
d)
Impr
oved
saf
ety
of n
on-m
otor
ised
trans
port
/ vul
nera
ble
road
use
rs –
as
mea
sure
d by
?
BL=
%Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
%Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
%Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
%Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
Mot
or v
ehic
le in
spec
tion
syst
em:
Inve
stig
ate
& de
velo
p a
perio
dic
mot
or
vehi
cle
insp
ectio
n sy
stem
(B3)
– fo
r al
l typ
es o
f veh
icle
s at
all
loca
tions
-–
base
d on
NSI
sta
ndar
ds
1N
NR
SC
NSI
NPo
lLA
NaT
IS
400
XX
2.
Road
veh
icle
insp
ectio
ns: I
nten
sify
on
-the-
road
veh
icle
insp
ectio
ns/c
ontro
l - a
t roa
dblo
ck a
nd c
heck
poin
ts, i
ncl.
road
wor
thin
ess
& pu
blic
pas
seng
er
trans
port
perm
its (B
1; B
3)
1N
NPo
l
NaT
ISLA R
AM
WT
6000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Good
tran
spor
t: Im
prov
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
ll go
ods
trans
port
requ
irem
ents
(inc
l. tra
nspo
rt of
ha
zard
ous
mat
eria
ls) (B
5.2)
1N
NPo
lLA R
AN
RSC
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Spec
ifi c
vehi
cle
safe
ty is
sues
: Dea
l wi
th s
peci
fi c v
ehic
le s
afet
y iss
ues,
in
cl. d
ark
/ tin
ted
wind
ows,
use
of c
ell
phon
es, p
oor t
yre
and
over
load
ing
– ba
sed
on N
SI s
tand
ards
1N
RA
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Vehi
cle
safe
ty te
chno
logi
es:
Inve
stig
ate
& en
cour
age
depl
oym
ent o
f im
prov
ed v
ehic
le s
afet
y te
chno
logi
es
appr
opria
te fo
r Nam
ibia
, inc
l. sp
eed
limite
rs, c
rash
pre
vent
ion
devic
es,
elec
troni
c st
abilit
y co
ntro
l, an
ti-lo
ck
brak
ing
syst
ems,
rada
r and
cra
sh
miti
gatio
n de
vices
(B6)
2N
RA
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Deve
lop
& Im
plem
ent S
afe
Flee
t Po
licy:
Enco
urag
e pu
blic
tran
spor
t an
d fl e
et m
anag
ers
in p
rivat
e an
d pu
blic
sec
tor t
o pu
rcha
se, o
pera
te &
m
aint
ain
vehi
cles
that
offe
r adv
ance
d te
chno
logi
es a
nd h
igh
leve
ls of
oc
cupa
nt p
rote
ctio
n (B
6.1)
2N
NR
SC
MW
TN
Pol
LAs
NaT
IS
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
New
& im
porte
d ve
hicl
e st
anda
rds:
Enco
urag
e ag
reem
ent t
o en
sure
all
new
& im
porte
d ve
hicl
es a
re e
quip
ped
with
sea
t bel
ts, p
assin
g cr
ash
test
s, e
tc.
(as
min
imum
sta
ndar
ds);
Enco
urag
e in
cent
ives/
pena
lties
towa
rds
vehi
cles
wi
th h
ighe
r saf
ety
stan
dard
s –
base
d on
NSI
sta
ndar
ds
2N
Cust
omN
SI10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Pede
stria
n pr
otec
tion:
Enc
oura
ge
appl
icat
ion
of p
edes
trian
pro
tect
ion
regu
latio
ns
1N
MW
TN
RSC
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 28Decade of Action.indd 28 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 29
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
3.
Good
MIS
, Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t and
R&
D
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
MWT / RA, MWT / RA
a)
MIS
in p
lace
, sha
red
an
d pr
oper
ly ut
ilised
fo
r dec
ision
-mak
ing
b)
Valu
e of
Veh
icle
in
form
atio
n fo
r de
cisio
n m
akin
g
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
MIS
: Exp
and/
Impr
ove
NaT
IS/T
rafm
an
Syst
em o
n ve
hicl
es a
nd v
ehic
le
safe
ty??
1N
NaT
IS10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
2.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
& P
erfo
rman
ce
Mgt
: Est
ablis
h Th
eme
D Co
mm
ittee
on
Roa
d Sa
fety
and
Mee
t ann
ually
in
Feb
for p
lann
ing
& bu
dget
ing;
W
orks
hop
in A
ugus
t to
eval
uate
pe
rform
ance
& to
pre
pare
for a
nnua
l N
atio
nal C
onfe
renc
e in
Oct
ober
1N
TCN
RSC
Don
or0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
R&D:
Incr
ease
rese
arch
in s
afet
y te
chno
logi
es d
esig
ned
to re
duce
risk
s to
vul
nera
ble
road
use
rs2
NN
RSC
Don
or0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
R&D:
Inve
stig
ate/
rese
arch
impr
oved
ve
hicl
e sa
fety
tech
nolo
gies
and
liai
se
with
inte
rnat
iona
l R&D
Inst
itutio
ns
(B6)
2N
NR
SCD
onor
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
5.
UN
Saf
ety
Regu
latio
ns: I
nves
tigat
e,
appl
y an
d pr
omul
gate
mot
or v
ehic
le
safe
ty re
gula
tions
as
deve
lope
d by
the
UN
Wor
ld F
orum
for
H
arm
oniza
tion
of V
ehic
le R
egul
atio
ns
(WP
29)
2N
NR
SC0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
New
car
ass
essm
ent p
rogr
amm
e:
Inve
stig
ate
& de
velo
p &
Impl
emen
t a
new
car a
sses
smen
t pro
gram
me
2N
NSI
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7 Pe
rform
ance
Mgt
: Sha
re re
sear
ch
and
perfo
rman
ce fi
ndin
gs; p
rom
ote
dial
ogue
to p
rom
ote
lear
ning
2N
TC0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
8.
Upd
ate
Plan
s: S
trate
gy a
nd P
roje
ct /
Initi
ative
Pla
ns2
NTC
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 29Decade of Action.indd 29 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.30
THEM
E E:
ENG
INEE
RING
: ROA
DS [P
ILLA
R 2]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
1.
Capa
cita
ted
Inst
itutio
ns w
ith
good
Syn
ergy
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
STAK
EHO
LDER
S IN
CL.
RA,
MW
T, L
As,
Cons
ulta
nts,
Con
tract
ors
2
MWT / RA
a)
Staf
f cap
acity
– b
ased
on
% c
ompe
tent
st
aff i
n al
l req
uire
d po
sitio
ns
b)
% o
f req
uire
d fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed to
exe
cute
Th
eme
E in
itiat
ives
for
the
year
BL=
TB
DY1
= 80
% ?
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
All r
esou
rces
: Dev
elop
a c
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent p
lan
base
d on
cap
acity
ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent
1N
NR
SCAl
lSH
s40
0X
X
2.
Hum
an re
sour
ces:
Bui
ld h
uman
ca
paci
ty a
ccor
ding
to p
lan
– th
roug
h st
affi n
g &
skills
dev
elop
men
t; in
cl.
road
saf
ety
train
ing
& ed
ucat
ion
in
low
cost
saf
ety
engi
neer
ing,
saf
ety
audi
t tra
inin
g of
eng
inee
rs (C
1.1)
, tra
inin
g of
com
mun
ity c
ontra
ctor
s (C
4.2)
1Y
NR
SCAl
lSH
s10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
3.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Bui
ld s
truct
ural
ca
paci
ty b
y m
eans
of a
ppro
pria
te
legi
slatio
n, p
olic
ies
and
proc
edur
es,
e.g.
legi
slate
on
audi
ts o
n ne
w an
d ex
istin
g ro
ads
(C1.
2)
1N
NR
SCM
WT
MoJ
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Stru
ctur
al re
sour
ces:
Bui
ld s
truct
ural
ca
paci
ty b
y es
tabl
ishin
g a
spec
ialis
t ro
ad s
afet
y an
d tra
ffi c
unit
to m
onito
r an
d im
prov
e th
e sa
fety
of t
he ro
ad
netw
ork
2N
NR
SCM
WT
RA
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
5.
Phys
ical
reso
urce
s: A
cqui
re fa
cilit
ies,
ve
hicl
es, e
quip
men
t and
mat
eria
ls as
re
quire
d, a
ccor
ding
to P
lan
2N
NR
SC10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Rela
tiona
l res
ourc
es: B
uild
&
mai
ntai
n go
od re
latio
ns, a
llianc
es
and
partn
ersh
ips
(loca
l, re
gion
al a
nd
inte
rnat
iona
l) –
with
dev
elop
men
t ba
nks,
GRN
, LAs
, NGO
s, C
BOs,
Pr
ivate
Sec
tor –
to e
nsur
e sa
fe in
fra
desig
n pr
inci
ples
; pro
mot
e ro
ad
safe
ty o
wner
ship
and
acc
ount
abilit
y am
ongs
t ind
ustry
SH
s; m
ake
RA
lega
lly re
spon
sible
for i
mpr
ovin
g ro
ad
safe
ty, re
porti
ng a
nnua
lly o
n sa
fety
sit
uatio
n
1N
NR
SCAl
lSH
s0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 30Decade of Action.indd 30 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 31
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Safe
r Roa
ds
Defi
ned
as:
- Go
od la
nd u
se
plan
ning
and
des
ign
- Go
od ro
ad s
urfa
ces
(con
stru
cted
, re
habi
litat
ed &
m
aint
aine
d)
- Cl
ear r
oad
mar
king
s an
d sig
ns
- Sa
fe ro
ad
envir
onm
ents
1
RA / MWT
a)
Supp
ortiv
e La
nd U
se
Plan
ning
, Urb
an &
Ro
ad D
esig
n; E
xten
t th
at tr
ansp
ort s
afet
y is
inte
grat
ed in
road
pl
anni
ng; m
obilit
y an
d ac
cess
ibilit
y
b)
% o
f sur
face
d an
d un
-sur
face
d ro
ads
in
unac
cept
able
pos
ition
c)
Num
ber o
f bla
ck
spot
s (h
igh
risk
road
se
ctio
ns) i
n N
amib
ia
(con
sider
ing
road
s,
obst
ruct
ions
, ani
mal
s,
etc.
)
d)
% o
f roa
d pr
ojec
ts
fund
ed o
n tim
e ac
cord
ing
to B
usin
ess
Plan
s
BL=
?Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 0
BL=
?Y1
= 12
%Y2
= 11
%Y3
= 10
%Y4
= 9%
Y5=
8%Y6
= 7.
5%Y7
= 7%
Y8=
6.5%
Y9=
6%Y0
= 5.
5%
BL=
?Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 0
BL=
?Y1
= 10
0%Y2
= 10
0%Y3
= 10
0%Y4
= 10
0%Y5
= 10
0%Y6
= 10
0%Y7
= 10
0%Y8
= 10
0%Y9
= 10
0%Y0
= 10
0%
1.
Plan
ning
& D
esig
n: P
rom
ote
safe
r pl
anni
ng a
nd d
esign
of r
oad
infra
struc
ture
by
revis
ing/
dev
elopi
ng, s
harin
g &
enfo
rcin
g sta
ndar
ds fo
r saf
e ro
ad d
esign
an
d op
erat
ion, I
nfl u
ence
long
term
ur
ban
plan
ning
to e
nsur
e sa
fe ro
ads a
nd
trans
port,
con
sider
ing
trans
port
dem
and
man
agem
ent,
land
use
man
agem
ent
and
all m
odes
of t
rans
port
in p
lanni
ng
and
desig
n of
infra
struc
ture
; con
sider
ing
hum
an a
nd ve
hicle
fact
ors,
espe
cially
sp
eed
sens
itive
desig
n; in
tegr
ate
new
stand
ards
in in
main
tena
nce
prog
ram
mes
–b
ased
on
SADC
stan
dard
s; Pr
omot
e th
e Sa
fer S
yste
m A
ppro
ach
and
the
role
of se
lf-ex
plain
ing
and
forg
iving
road
in
frastr
uctu
re; s
et m
inim
um sa
fety
ratin
gs
for n
ew d
esign
s and
road
inve
stmen
ts (C
2)
1Y
MW
T
RA
NR
SCG
IZLA
s
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
2.
Plan
ning
& D
esig
n: D
irect
pur
pose
ful
effo
rts to
the
plan
ning
and
des
ign o
f saf
er
road
s for
non
-mot
orise
d tra
nspo
rt (C
4)1
NLA
RA
Cons
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
3.
Inte
grat
ed tr
ansp
ort s
afet
y pla
ns:
Deve
lop in
tegr
ated
tran
spor
t saf
ety p
lans
for a
ll 13
regio
ns, i
ncl.
esta
blish
men
t of
form
al in
frastr
uctu
re p
lanni
ng st
ruct
ures
at
loca
l leve
l (C5
)
2N
MW
TR
AN
RSC
GIZ
2000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Audi
t urb
an p
lans
and
des
igns
and
m
ake
reco
mm
enda
tions
for s
afer
tra
nspo
rt; h
ighlig
ht u
nsaf
e pl
ans a
nd
desig
ns; r
ecom
men
d im
prov
emen
ts
2N
RA
LAs
Tshi
p B
oard
Cons
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
5.
Esta
blish
a h
azar
dous
acc
iden
t loc
atio
n im
prov
emen
t sys
tem
with
a m
ulti-
disc
iplin
ary a
ccid
ent i
nves
tigat
ion te
am &
pr
ogra
mm
e (C
3)
1M
WT
NR
SCR
AN
Pol
MoJ
GIZ
1000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Road
safe
ty a
udits
: Do
regu
lar sy
stem
atic
road
safe
ty au
dits/
asse
ssm
ents
on
all n
ew a
nd e
xistin
g ro
ads a
ccor
ding
to
act
/ pro
cedu
res &
reco
mm
end
im
prov
emen
ts, in
cl. a
ccid
ent p
rone
in
frastr
uctu
re si
tes (
C1.3
); up
date
the
syste
m/R
MS
RA
MW
TN
RSC
GTZ
5000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 31Decade of Action.indd 31 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.32
7.
Road
safe
ty a
udits
: Do
regu
lar sy
stem
atic
road
safe
ty au
dits/
asse
ssm
ents
on
non-
mot
orise
d fa
cilitie
s at r
egion
al lev
el, a
ccor
ding
to a
ct/ p
roce
dure
s &
reco
mm
end
impr
ovem
ents
incl.
Saf
e Ro
utes
to S
choo
l Pro
ject (
C4.1
)
RCs LAs
MW
TR
A20
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
RMS:
Mak
e be
tter u
se o
f the
RM
S by
co
llect
ing
and
shar
ing
info
rmat
ion
with
ot
her R
oad
Safe
ty T
hem
es0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
9.
Impr
ove
infra
stru
ctur
e an
d fa
cilit
ies
for n
on-m
otor
ised
tran
spor
t, e.
g. s
afe
walk
ways
, cro
ssin
gs a
nd b
icyc
le la
nes
(C4.
3); i
mpl
emen
t Saf
e Ro
utes
to
Scho
ol P
roje
ct (C
4.4)
RCs LAs
MW
TR
A10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
10.
Prov
ide
infra
stru
ctur
e an
d fa
cilit
ies
for
publ
ic tr
ansp
ort,
incl
. tax
i ran
ks &
bus
st
ops
(con
tribu
te fu
nds?
)LA
NR
SCR
AM
WT
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
11.
Rest
pla
ces:
Pro
vide
safe
rest
pla
ces
alon
g al
l mai
n ro
ads
RA
LA0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
12.
Mon
itor R
A co
nstru
ctio
n of
90k
m/a
of
new
road
s; 1
40km
/a m
ain
road
re
habi
litat
ion;
upg
radi
ng o
f 100
km
/a o
f roa
ds to
bitu
men
sta
ndar
d;
repl
acem
ent o
f 100
% o
f los
t gra
vel
on g
rave
l roa
ds a
nd re
surfa
ce 1
0%/a
of
road
net
work
; mai
ntai
n go
od ra
tio
betw
een
new
and
mai
nten
ance
pr
ojec
ts
NR
SCR
ALA
s0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
13.
Blac
k sp
ots:
Rem
ove
all b
lack
spo
ts,
incl
udin
g sa
fer r
oad
envir
onm
ents
, ba
sed
on R
MS
RA
RFA LAs
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
14.
Spee
d lim
its: R
evie
w an
d se
t ap
prop
riate
spe
ed li
mits
for a
ll se
ctio
ns
of ro
ads,
bas
ed o
n le
gisla
tion
MW
TN
Pol
LAs
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
15.
Impr
ove
sign
age
and
road
mar
king
s on
road
s, b
ased
on
audi
t fi n
ding
s0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
16.
Ensu
re w
ork
zone
saf
ety
at
cons
truct
ion
proj
ects
, bas
ed o
n 19
99
legi
slatio
n10
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 32Decade of Action.indd 32 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 33
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obj
ectiv
e
PrAcc
PI (S
MA
RT
ito
CTQ
Q)
Targ
etIn
itiat
ive
PrY/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot
Est
Cos
t(0
00s)
Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y0
3.
Good
MIS
, Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t and
R&
D
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
RA / MWT
a)
MIS
in p
lace
, sha
red
an
d pr
oper
ly ut
ilised
fo
r dec
ision
-mak
ing
b)
Valu
e of
Roa
d in
form
atio
n fo
r de
cisio
n m
akin
g
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
MIS
: Lin
k ro
ad s
ectio
ns to
acc
iden
t st
atist
ics
and
anal
yse
to c
ateg
orise
ro
ads
in te
rms
of s
afet
y10
00X
X
2.
Desi
gn s
tand
ards
: Ass
ess
to
what
ext
ent d
esig
n st
anda
rds
and
prin
cipl
es a
re a
ppro
pria
te a
nd a
pplie
d / i
mpl
emen
ted;
regu
larly
revie
w th
e ro
ad d
esig
n st
anda
rds
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
3.
Do b
usin
ess
case
s fo
r saf
er ro
ad
infra
stru
ctur
e to
mee
t DoA
targ
ets;
sh
are
rese
arch
fi nd
ings
1000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Mon
itor t
he s
afet
y pe
rform
ance
of
inve
stm
ents
in ro
ad in
frast
ruct
ure
by
RA, L
As &
oth
er a
genc
ies
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
R&D:
Pro
mot
e R&
D in
infra
stru
ctur
e sa
fety
impr
ovem
ents
; Pro
mot
e pi
lot/
dem
onst
ratio
n pr
ojec
ts to
eva
luat
e sa
fety
impr
ovem
ents
/inn
ovat
ions
, es
peci
ally
for v
ulne
rabl
e ro
ad u
sers
1000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
& P
erfo
rman
ce
Mgt
: Est
ablis
h Th
eme
E Co
mm
ittee
on
Road
Saf
ety
and
Mee
t ann
ually
in F
eb
for p
lann
ing
& bu
dget
ing;
Wor
ksho
p in
Aug
ust t
o ev
alua
te p
erfo
rman
ce
& to
pre
pare
for a
nnua
l Nat
iona
l Co
nfer
ence
in O
ctob
er
NR
SCD
onor
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
7.
ITS:
Inve
stig
ate
depl
oym
ent o
f in
tellig
ent t
rans
port
info
rmat
ion
and
cont
rol s
yste
ms
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
8.
Perfo
rman
ce M
gt: S
hare
rese
arch
an
d pe
rform
ance
fi nd
ings
; pro
mot
e di
alog
ue to
pro
mot
e le
arni
ng0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
9.
Upd
ate
Plan
s: S
trate
gy a
nd P
roje
ct /
Initi
ative
Pla
ns0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
Decade of Action.indd 33Decade of Action.indd 33 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.34
THEM
E F:
EM
ERGE
NCY
RESP
ONSE
[PIL
LAR
5]
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
Capa
cita
ted
Emer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Inst
itutio
ns
with
goo
d Sy
nerg
y
Capa
city
ach
ieve
d th
roug
h:-
Hum
an R
esou
rces
- St
ruct
ural
Res
ourc
es
- Ph
ysic
al R
esou
rces
- M
onet
ary
Reso
urce
s
- Re
latio
nal R
esou
rces
2
MoHSS
a)
No
of tr
aine
d BL
S (b
asic
life
sup
port
staf
f) fo
r 24
h se
rvic
e;
5/am
bula
nce
for a
4
shift
sys
tem
b)
Fully
equ
ippe
d am
bula
nces
per
1 p
er
popu
latio
n
c)
Avai
labi
lity
of re
quire
d ve
hicl
es, e
quip
men
t &
mat
eria
ls
BL=
70
Y1=
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
600
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
2500
BL=
TB
DY1
= 30
kY2
= 25
kY3
= 20
kY4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 10
k
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
All R
esou
rces
: Rev
iew
the
capa
city
de
velo
pmen
t pla
n ba
sed
on c
apac
ity
need
s as
sess
men
t for
road
saf
ety
emer
genc
y re
spon
se (
refe
r to
exist
ing
EMS
repo
rt) –
The
me
Com
mitt
ee to
upd
ate
annu
ally
(D1.
2)
MH
SM
VAF
J15
00X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
2.
HR:
Bui
ld h
uman
cap
acity
acc
ordi
ng
to p
lan
– th
roug
h st
affi n
g of
e.g
. BL
S, IL
S, p
aram
edic
s/AL
S &
reha
b pr
ofes
siona
ls (c
ontri
bute
to 3
0%)
MH
SOt
hers
1200
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
3.
HR:
Bui
ld h
uman
cap
acity
acc
ordi
ng
to p
lan
– th
roug
h sk
ills d
evel
opm
ent /
tra
inin
g of
e.g
. BLS
, ILS
, par
amed
ics/
AL
S &
reha
b pr
ofes
siona
ls, in
cl.
train
ing
of B
LS (1
26 p
a in
itial
ly), p
ost
grad
uate
s –
by C
olle
ges
(D1.
4, D
3)
– 10
% fu
ndin
g co
ntrib
utio
n
MH
S
MVA
FPr
ivLA
sM
oD
2000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
4.
Phys
ical
Res
ourc
es: D
evel
op
fully
equ
ippe
d tre
atm
ent a
nd
reha
bilit
atio
n fa
cilit
ies
/ cen
tres
(D1)
, in
cl. a
dapt
atio
n of
hou
ses;
pro
vide/
build
13
reha
b ce
ntre
s (fu
ndin
g co
ntrib
utio
n to
min
istrie
s)
MoH
SSM
VAF
5000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
5.
Phys
ical
Res
ourc
es: A
cqui
re fu
lly
equi
pped
veh
icle
s, in
cl. a
mbu
lanc
es
and
resc
ue v
ehic
les
(D1)
; fun
ding
co
ntrib
utio
n of
10
ambu
lanc
es p
er
annu
m; a
ppro
x. 4
0/a
prov
ided
by
GRN
– 1
0% fu
ndin
g co
ntrib
utio
n
MH
SM
VAF
6000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Rela
tiona
l Res
ourc
es: I
mpr
ove
rela
tions
, bui
ld a
llianc
es &
pa
rtner
ship
s in
the
Them
e (lo
cal,
regi
onal
& in
tern
atio
nal)
MH
SM
VAF
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 34Decade of Action.indd 34 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 35
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
STAK
EHO
LDER
S IN
CL.:
1.
Emer
genc
y Se
rvic
es:
MoH
SS A
mbu
lanc
e Se
rvic
es, I
SOS,
E-M
ed
Res
cue
24, C
omm
unity
B
ased
Em
erge
ncy
Serv
ices
, MVA
F, C
oW
Traf
fi c -P
ublic
Saf
ety,
LA
s
2.
Hos
pita
l tre
atm
ent:
MoH
SS, P
rivat
e H
ospi
tals
& C
linic
s
3.
Reha
bilit
atio
n:M
oHSS
, Priv
ate
Hos
p, R
ehab
Cen
tres,
Co
mm
unity
Hea
lth
Wor
kers
/Vol
unte
ers,
M
VAF,
d)
No
of tr
aum
a re
spon
se
and
care
cen
tres
e)
No
of c
apac
itate
d re
habi
litat
ion
cent
res
acco
rdin
g to
min
imum
st
anda
rds
f) %
of r
equi
red
fund
ing
appr
oved
to e
xecu
te
Them
e F
initi
ative
s fo
r th
e ye
ar
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
0Y1
= 1
Y2=
3Y3
= 4
Y4=
5Y5
= 7
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
13
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
Decade of Action.indd 35Decade of Action.indd 35 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.36
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
2.
Effe
ctiv
e &
Effi c
ient
Re
scue
, Tre
atm
ent
& Re
habi
litat
ion
Oper
atio
ns
1
MoHSS
a)
Resc
ue: P
ropo
rtion
of
all e
mer
genc
y re
scue
re
spon
ses
prov
ided
wi
thin
1 h
our (
gold
en
hour
) (fro
m ti
me
of
acci
dent
and
arri
val o
f re
spon
se a
t site
)
b)
Pre-
hosp
ital:
Prop
ortio
n of
crit
ical
ly in
jure
d pe
ople
in
hand
s of
em
erge
ncy
staf
f who
die
d on
the
scen
e, e
nrou
te to
ho
spita
l
c)
Trea
tmen
t: Pr
opor
tion
of p
atie
nts
who
died
in
hosp
ital
d)
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s su
cces
sful
ly in
tegr
ated
in
com
mun
ity a
fter
reha
bilit
atio
n
BL=
40
% ?
Y1=
50Y2
= 60
Y3=
70Y4
= 75
Y5=
80%
?Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 95
% ?
BL=
TB
DY1
= %
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
BL=
TB
DY1
= %
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
BL=
TB
DY1
= %
Y2=
Y3=
Y4=
Y5=
Y6=
Y7=
Y8=
Y9=
Y0=
1.
Resp
onse
tim
es: D
evel
op p
roce
ss fo
r im
prov
ed re
spon
se ti
me
by m
eans
of
impr
oved
qua
lity
of re
spon
se
oper
atio
ns; i
nves
tigat
e de
lays
; co
nsid
erin
g sa
fe s
peed
ing
1N
MoH
SSM
VAF
MW
TJ
2000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
2.
Resp
onse
/Tec
hnol
ogy:
Inve
stig
ate/
pilo
t/use
tech
nolo
gy in
car
s to
au
tom
atic
ally
signa
ls ac
cide
nt to
ca
ll ce
ntre
on
any
impa
ct (n
eede
d es
peci
ally
for r
emot
e ar
eas)
, bas
ed
on tr
acki
ng d
evic
es (l
ink
to T
hem
e D)
MW
T
RA NRS
CM
oHSS
MVA
F
2000
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
3.
Resp
onse
trea
tmen
t: Pr
ovid
e ap
prop
riate
em
erge
ncy
treat
men
t on
site
MoH
SSAL
L0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
One
natio
nal e
mer
genc
y ca
ll ce
ntre
: Op
erat
e th
e sin
gle
natio
nwid
e te
leph
one
num
ber f
or e
mer
genc
ies
MoH
SSOP
MN
RSC
NPo
l10
000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Hos
pita
l tre
atm
ent:
Deve
lop
an
impr
oved
pre
hosp
ital c
are
syst
ems
and
hosp
ital t
raum
a ca
re s
yste
m;
Prov
ide
appr
opria
te e
mer
genc
y tre
atm
ent
at c
entre
s (D
1)
MoH
SSM
VAF
RCC
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
6.
Reha
bilit
atio
n: P
rovid
e ap
prop
riate
re
habi
litat
ion
treat
men
t at c
entre
s;
incl
. psy
chol
ogic
al/s
pirit
ual s
uppo
rt;
incl
ude
fam
ily
MoH
SSM
VAF
LA0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
Reha
bilit
atio
n: E
stab
lish
appr
opria
te
road
use
r ins
uran
ce s
chem
e; g
reen
ca
rd; f
rom
fuel
levie
sM
WT
MVA
F M
OFM
ME
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Reha
bilit
atio
n: P
rom
ote
and
prov
ide
ince
ntive
s fo
r em
ploy
ers
to h
ire a
nd
reta
in p
eopl
e wi
th d
isabi
litie
s; li
nk
to c
omm
unity
-bas
ed re
hab
syst
em;
enfo
rce
faci
litie
s al
so p
rovid
e ac
cess
to
peo
ple
with
disa
bilit
ies
MoL
MH
SM
VAF
NRS
CN
DC LA
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
9.
Faci
litie
s m
gt: M
aint
enan
ce &
re
plac
emen
t of a
ll bu
ildin
gs &
eq
uipm
ent
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 36Decade of Action.indd 36 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 37
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
3.
Good
MIS
, Pe
rform
ance
M
anag
emen
t and
R&
D
- M
easu
re
- Ev
alua
te
- Re
port
- Im
prov
e
- Le
arn
- Dr
ive &
Dia
logu
e
- U
pdat
e pl
ans
2
MoHSS
a)
Avai
labi
lity
and
use
of
inte
grat
ed h
ealth
and
ac
cide
nt in
form
atio
n fo
r dec
ision
-mak
ing
b)
Valu
e of
hea
lth a
nd
acci
dent
info
rmat
ion
for d
ecisi
on m
akin
g
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
BL=
Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
=
1.
Call
Cent
re: I
mpr
ove
the
incid
ent
man
agem
ent s
yste
m;
esta
blish
a
Natio
nal C
all C
entre
with
one
tel n
umbe
r to
pro
mot
e ea
rly a
cces
s; ro
ll out
pilo
t na
tiona
lly (i
ncl.
all e
mer
genc
ies;
cont
ribut
e 30
% to
esta
blish
men
t cos
t (D2
)
OPM
(EM
U)
NRS
CM
HS
MVA
F10
000
XX
2.
Impr
ove
exist
ing
Healt
h In
form
ation
Mgt
Sy
stem
by i
nteg
ratin
g he
alth
info
rmat
ion
with
acc
iden
t inf
orm
ation
; inc
lude
Inju
ry
surv
eillan
ce, m
easu
ring
perfo
rman
ce in
Ro
ad S
afet
y Em
erge
ncy R
espo
nse,
with
an
alytic
al fe
atur
es; b
ased
on
iden
tifi ed
all
dat
a ne
eds;
impr
ove
inte
rface
s with
all
relev
ant s
yste
ms;
mak
e it
web
base
d (D
3)
MoH
SSM
WT
Othe
r50
00X
XX
3.
Regu
larly
mea
sure
and
cap
ture
pe
rform
ance
; coll
ect n
ation
al fi g
ures
on
all
resc
ue o
pera
tions
and
resp
onse
tim
es a
nd
effi c
iencie
s; typ
e of
inju
ry c
ausin
g de
ath;
typ
e of
acc
iden
t, et
c. (D
2, D
3)
MoH
SS0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
4.
Evalu
ate p
erfo
rman
ce in
form
ation
; th
e ef
fect
ivene
ss a
nd e
ffi cie
ncy o
f the
em
erge
ncy s
ervic
es a
nd lo
nger
term
re
habi
litatio
n –
analy
sis &
synt
h
MoH
SS0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
5.
Lega
l res
pons
es: b
ased
on
thor
ough
re
sear
ch, a
pply
effe
ctive
lega
l res
pons
es
to ro
ad d
eath
s and
inju
ries;
enco
urag
e fa
ir se
ttlem
ents
and
justi
ce fo
r the
ber
eave
d an
d in
jure
d
MW
TM
oHSS
MVA
F0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
6.
Prom
ote
R&D:
Bas
ed o
n pe
rform
ance
in
form
ation
, im
prov
e in
vesti
gatio
ns in
to
accid
ents;
impr
ove
post-
cras
h re
spon
se;
bette
r tre
atm
ent o
f spe
cifi c
inju
ries;
inve
stiga
te re
ason
s for
dea
th d
urin
g go
lden
hou
r and
at h
ospi
tals;
Inju
ry
surv
eillan
ce
MoH
SSM
VAF
MW
TN
RSC
1000
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
7.
Them
e Co
mm
ittee
& P
erf M
gt: E
stabl
ish
Them
e F
Com
mitt
ee o
n Ro
ad S
afet
y an
d M
eet a
nnua
lly in
Feb
for p
lanni
ng
& bu
dget
ing;
Wor
ksho
p in
Aug
ust t
o ev
aluat
e pe
rform
ance
& to
pre
pare
for
annu
al Na
tiona
l Con
fere
nce
in O
ctob
er
NRS
CDo
nor
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
8.
Perfo
rman
ce M
gt: S
hare
rese
arch
and
pe
rform
ance
fi nd
ings
; pro
mot
e di
alogu
e to
pr
omot
e lea
rnin
g0
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
9.
Upda
te P
lans:
Stra
tegy
and
Pro
ject /
In
itiativ
e Pl
ans
0X
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
Decade of Action.indd 37Decade of Action.indd 37 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM
National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020
WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.38
OUTP
UTS
& OU
TCOM
ES
Obje
ctiv
e
Pr
Acc
PI (S
MAR
T ito
CTQ
Q)Ta
rget
Initi
ativ
e
Pr
Y/N
Resp
Supp
SJO
Tot E
st
Cost
(000
s)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y0
Soci
o -E
cono
mic
–
Envi
ronm
en-ta
l Res
ults
2
NRSC C
a)
Soci
al: A
nnua
l No
of
road
cas
ualti
es
b)
Soci
al: A
nnua
l No
of ro
ad fa
talit
ies
per
100,
000
popu
latio
n
c)
Econ
omic
: Cos
t of
road
traf
fi c a
ccid
ents
to
Nam
ibia
[% o
f GD
P]
d)
Inve
stm
ent i
n ro
ad
safe
ty a
s %
of t
otal
ro
ad in
fra in
vest
men
t
BL=
300
Y1=
282
Y2=
264
Y3=
246
Y4=
228
Y5=
210
Y6=
198
Y7=
186
Y8=
174
Y9=
162
Y0=
150
BL=
16
Y1=
15.5
Y2=
15Y3
= 14
.5Y4
= 14
Y5=
13.5
Y6=
13Y7
= 12
.5Y8
= 12
Y9=
11.5
Y0=
11
BL=
2.0
0Y1
= Y2
= Y3
= Y4
= Y5
= Y6
= Y7
= Y8
= Y9
= Y0
= 1.
00 ?
BL=
1%
?Y1
0= 1
0%
Decade of Action.indd 38Decade of Action.indd 38 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM