the meaning of relationships chapter 1, morris rosenberg, “the logic of survey analysis.”...

12
THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

Upload: hugh-toby-lawson

Post on 28-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPSChapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

Page 2: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

THREE possible forms a relationship can take

1.None of the variables influences the other (Symmetrical Relationship)

2.Both variables influence each other (Reciprocal Relationship)

3.Only one of the variables influences the other (Asymmetrical Relationship)

Page 3: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

I. Symmetrical Relationships- This means that neither variable “causes” the other,

neither variable can be considered “prior” in time to the other.

Five types of symmetrical relationships

1.Alternative indicators of the same concept (e.g. signs of anxiety, palmer perspiration and heart pounding).- Factor analysis.

2.Effects of a common cause (e.g. Storks and babies, or restitutive punishment and individualism)- often referred to as ‘spurious’ relationships.

Page 4: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

3. Functional interdependence as elements of a unit (e.g. the presence of lungs correlates with the presence of the heart, it is not that one “causes” the other but both are indispensible in the functioning of the unit, the organism)- structural analysis

4.Parts of a “complex” (e.g. rich people are often members of country clubs, drive particular brands of cars, stay at particular types of hotels when on trips, attend the opera etc- there is no functional interdependence between these different parts but the lifestyle “complex” ensures that these are often found together).- descriptive analysis

5.Accidental or Fortuitous: (e.g. the association between the emergence of the space age and rock and roll music).

**Elaboration is generally not a useful second step after the discovery of the symmetrical nature of relationships.

Page 5: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

II. Reciprocal Relationships (both influence each other)Main Problem: Which variable is the cause and which is the

effect.

Alternating Asymmetry: one acts on the other, the other acts on the first- mutually reinforcing the relationship, servo-mechanism, feedback , e.g. thermostat and temperature; Republican message and Republican convictions.

-The ‘chicken and egg’ are both responsible for each other, which came first, the “primal cause” is not commented upon in reciprocal relationships.

-Causation analysis, elaboration of relationships relates to Asymmetrical Relationships

Page 6: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDE

III. Asymmetrical Relationships-age and movies: inverse relationship- an external influence produces a change in something-Scientists are interested in i) causation ii) understanding iii)

prediction, iv) control- The variable that is not subject to change has causal priority- it comes before the other variable in the relationship.-Fixed variables, also known as “status variables”: sex, race,

birth order, national origin.- Relatively but not absolutely fixed variables, social class,

religion, rural/urban residence

SCIENCE IMPLIES EXPLANATION THROUGH ‘INVARIABLE LAWS’

-Dominant direction of influence of variables, e.g. mental health and religion.

Page 7: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS

1.Stimulus-Response: e.g. war and civilian morale, those exposed to the stimulus and those not exposed must be similar on all other factors. This makes the ‘selection’ of the sample of great importance in inferring stimulus-response relationship.

2.Disposition-Response: liberal- liberal action, the tendency, given circumstances, to respond in specific ways (e.g. attitudinal research, attitude is taken as independent variable and action as dependent variable, e.g. prejudice and discrimination). Beware of redundancy, where a larger concept embraces a smaller one

Page 8: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS

3. Property-Disposition: e.g. sugar’s properties, shape, size, weight etc and solubility. Central type of relationship in social research, the property of an individual and a disposition to act: race and alienation, region of country and voting, class and voting etc. Since properties are resistant to change they are often taken as independent variables.

4. Necessary precondition for a given effect: technological advancement and nuclear weaponry, technological advancement does not cause nuclear weapons but “makes it possible.” Free labor necessary precondition for development for capitalism.

Page 9: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS

5. Immanent relationship: property inherent in nature of setup to produce a relationship between two variables, e.g. Bureaucracy and red tape, the dependent variable arises out of the independent variable, bureaucracy leads to adherence to rules, which leads to red tape.

6. Means-ends (purposive relationships), e.g. standardization of procedure and lower costs, nest building and survival of the young.

Do the ends determine the means or do the means determine the ends, in whose mind does the purpose reside, if it resides in the mind of the actor then the end determined the means, if the end resides in the mind of the investigator then the means (cause) determines the end (effect)

Page 10: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

TASKS AT HAND

1.Assign meaning to the relationship, what kind is it? Asymmetrical, reciprocal or symmetrical2.If asymmetrical, which is the independent and which is the dependent variable.3.If symmetrical, what type is it, indicators of common concept, common cause (spurious), functional relationship and elements in a social complex4.If reciprocal, it tells us about the “dynamic nature” of social relationships, e.g. the cycle of poverty.

5.If asymmetrical, we need to determine, whether it is stimulus- response; disposition-behavior; property-disposition (or behavior); necessary precondition- consequence, variables immanent in structures and means-ends analysis.

Page 11: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES

Page 12: THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

SAMPLE SLIDES