the irrotational motion of a compressible inviscid uid - arxiv · the irrotational motion of a...
TRANSCRIPT
The irrotational motion of a compressible inviscid fluid
Robert M BradyUniversity of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FD, United Kingdom
February 1, 2013
Abstract
The irrotational motion of a compressible inviscid fluid is studied in the field of analoguegravity, where its metric is compared to that in general relativity [1], a fluid analogue of an evap-orating black hole [2] has been realized experimentally [3], and there are symmetries related tothe standard model [4]. Here we show the analogy also extends quantitatively to electromag-netic and quantum mechanical phenomena. We discuss a candidate model to account for thenumber and precision of these analogies.
1 Introduction
We will show that Euler’s equation for a com-pressible fluid has irrotational solutions whichsuperficially resemble smoke rings. Their equa-tions of motion through the fluid are completelyclassical, and the resulting trajectories obey sta-tistical equations which are identical to those ofthe Copenhagen interpretation of quantum me-chanics. A similar mechanism accounts for theemergence of quantum phenomena from classicalmotion in experiments where a droplet is madeto bounce on a liquid surface, exhibiting quan-tised energy levels, single-slit diffraction, double-slit diffraction and tunnelling [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Someof the ring-like solutions are chiral. Opposite chi-ralities attract and like chiralities repel with aninverse square force which has the same fluid dy-namic origin as the effect used for degassing oilby subjection to ultrasonic vibration [10, §4.4].The interaction obeys Maxwell’s equations andits strength is characterized by a fine structureconstant, α . 1/49.
Consider a compressible inviscid fluid such asthe air in the idealization it is continuous and
has no viscosity or thermal conductivity. Such afluid obeys Euler’s equation [10]
∂u
∂t+ (u.∇)u = − 1
ρ∇P (1)
where the pressure P (x, t) is a function of thedensity ρ(x, t) and ∂ρ/∂t = −∇(ρu). At lowamplitude this reduces to the wave equation
∂2ρ
∂t2− c2∇2ρ = 0 (2)
where c2 = ∂P∂ρ
. In addition to describing soundwaves, this equation has cylindrical solutions,the simplest of which is present in the surfacewaves just after a raindrop has hit a puddle. Incylindrical coordinates (r, θ, s)
ξ = A e−i(ωot+mθ−kss) Jm(krr) (3)
where ρρo
= 1+Re(ξ) and ρo is the mean density,Jm is a cylindrical Bessel function of the firstkind, m an integer and ω2
o = c2(k2s + k2r). It maybe verified by substitution that this obeys thewave equation. The flow pattern is irrotational,that is,
∮u.dl = 0 for any closed path, as shown
in the appendix.
1
arX
iv:1
301.
7540
v1 [
phys
ics.
gen-
ph]
31
Jan
2013
+
-
Figure 1: Sketch of an eddy, described by (3)with m = 1 and ks = 0. The compressions(red, schematic and not to scale) and rarefac-tions (green) rotate as shown. Note the contrarydirection of fluid flow near the rarefaction.
Figure 1 sketches the m = 1 solution. Thereare families of solutions, superficially resemblingsmoke rings, which can be obtained by curvingit into a torus. Two such solutions, which wecall ‘sonons’, are sketched in Figure 2.
(b)(a)
Figure 2: Two sonons obtained by curving theeddy of Figure 1 into a torus. The compressions(red) and rarefactions (green) rotate as shown.(a) R10 (see equation 6) (b) R11, obtained byadding a twist. This solution is chiral and themotion resolves into a spin about the axis.
In the case m = 0 or 1, the Appendix showsthat the associated density pattern can be writ-ten to a good approximation as a sum of spher-ical harmonic solutions to the wave equation inthe coordinates of figure 3:-
ξ = ψo(t) Rmn(x) (4)
whereψo = A e−iωot (5)
Rmn =
∫ 2π
0
e−i(mθ′−nφ)jm(krσ)krRodφ (6)
where n is an integer and jm is a spherical Besselfunction of the first kind.
ϕ
θ'σz
Ro
Figure 3: The coordinates used in (6)
1.1 Dimensions of a sonon
If the eddy in Figure 1 is terminated on two pla-nar surfaces, they will attract one another dueto the reduced Bernoulli pressure. This mustbe due to an attraction along the length of theeddy, similar to the attraction in a vortex.
When an ordinary vortex is curved into asmoke ring, this force is balanced by Mag-nus forces (like the lift of an aircraft wing)as the structure moves forward through thefluid [10]. However a sonon cannot experienceMagnus forces because it is irrotational, and con-sequently its radius will shrink, causing the am-plitude A in (5) to grow due to the conserva-tion of fluid energy. Nonlinear effects will haltthe shrinking before A reaches about 1 since thedensity cannot become negative.
x
z y
(a)(b)
aRo
2bR o
βc/2
Figure 4: (a) The fluid flows (blue) near a R11
sonon reinforce in the y direction at the instantshown. (b) The nonlinear region of reinforce-ment approximates to a cylinder. If it has di-ameter is aRo, length 2bRo and mean flow speed12βc, a reasonable estimate is a ≈ b ≈ β ≈ 1
Very near a R11 sonon, shown in Figure 4, themain component of the flow derives from the ra-dial flow speed due to an eddy with m = 1,which is ur ∝ ∂
∂rJ1(krr) (see the appendix).
These flows reinforce provided the diameter ofthe sonon is less than the first zero of ur, which
2
is 2× 0.92. Neglecting curvature and nonlinear-ities, the lowest energy (unexcited) state has, asan upper estimate,
Ro .0.92
kr(7)
1.2 Spin symmetry
The integral in (6) can be factorised into Rmn =[Br.Φr(r)][Bθ.Φθ(θ)][Bφ.Φφ(φ)], where Bi and Φi
are vectors.At large distance, the components of Φr can
be obtained by expanding the Bessel function atlarge r and neglecting small terms
Φr =1
r[ sin(krr), cos(krr) ] (8)
Notice that
i
(0 −ii 0
)∂Φ
∂r= krΦ
where we have defined Φ = ΦrΦθΦφ. The othereigenvector, [sin(krr),− cos(krr)], has an eigen-value of the opposite sign.
By inspection of (6) there is an eigenvectorΦφ = [e−inφ, einφ], which obeys
i
(1 00 −1
)∂Φ
∂φ= nΦ
Reversing the sign of n corresponds to revers-ing the spin direction, and it produces the othereigenvector with the opposite sign of eigenvalue.
In the θ direction, the contributions from thenear and far sides of the sonon produce wavepatterns which propagate in opposite directionsat the calculation position in Figure 3. The twoorthogonal components are Φφ = [Φ+,Φ−] whereΦ± = e−imθ ± eimθ. Thus
i
(0 11 0
)∂Φ
∂θ= mΦ
Notice that these matrices are the same as thePauli spin matrices. The appendix discusses apossible physical interpretation of the associatedspin-half symmetry, and also the analogy withthe Dirac equation.
1.3 Boundary condition
Taking one of the components of Φr in (8), thekinetic energy 1
2
∫ρu2 can be calculated in the
usual way in fluid dynamics. The value mustbe doubled to account for the potential energyof motion. The total energy inside a sphere ofradius R is (see the appendix)
Efluid ≈ πR2o R ρoc
2 (9)
This approximates to the energy in the fluidmotion of sonon since A and Bri are of order 1and the others diminish rapidly with radius.
Even without container walls, there will stillbe a boundary condition due to other sonons,since the energy in (9) will be reduced if theyalign themselves so they interfere destructivelyat large distance. The coupling mechanismwhich allows the lowest energy state to bereached was first reported in pendulum clocksby Huygens in 1665 [11] – see the appendix.
Figure 5 shows two R11 sonons which arealigned so they interfere destructively at largedistance. The spherical Bessel function j1(r)changes phase by π compared to a freely propa-gating wave when going through the centre, andit follows that destructive interference at largedistance means there must be constructive inter-ference in the region between the sonons. Thereis consequently an antinode of density on themirror line. Notice that the spin vectors in Fig-ure 5 are opposed.
M(a)
M(b)
z
xy
Figure 5: Pairs of R11 sonons of (a) opposite(b) the same chirality, aligned so their waves in-terfere destructively at large distance on an ex-tended line joining them. There is an antinodeof density on the mirror line M .
3
Suppose the sonons in a region are broughtcloser together to form a denser body where thetypical distance R between them is reduced. Ifthe process is adiabatic then, from (9), RR2
o willremain constant, and consequently the sononswill become enlarged, with a greater value of Ro.These enlarged structures are valid solutions toEuler’s equation provided their frequencies arealso redshifted, since if ξ(x, t) is a solution thenit may be verified by substitution into (1) thatξ(ax, at) is also a solution where a is an arbitraryscale factor (noting that the velocity u is unaf-fected by the scaling). A similar redshift near amassive body is studied in analogue gravity, asdiscussed further in the appendix.
2 Lorentz covariance
From (9), most of the fluid energy of a sononis at large distance, where the motion obeys thewave equation because it is low amplitude. Sincethe wave equation is Lorentz covariant, so is thismotion. Thus, if ξ(x, t) is a solution then ξ(x′, t′)is also a solution where x′ = γ(x − vt), y′ = y,z′ = z, t′ = γ(t− vx/c2) and 1
γ=√
1− v2/c2.Very near the sonon, the amplitude of mo-
tion is not negligible and the Lorentz symmetrymight, in principle, be perturbed by the non-linear term (u.∇)u in (1). However, consideradding a constant velocity to all motion. Re-placing u by u + v where v is constant givesa perturbation ε = (v.∇)u. This perturbationvanishes over a cycle because the fluid motionis oscillatory and returns to its starting-point,∫u dt = 0 and so∫
ε dt =
∫(v.∇)u dt = 0
Expectation values are usually defined to con-verge on the long term measurement. For preci-sion we define an ‘ordinary’ expectation valuewhere this measurement encompasses one ormore complete cycles. It follows that no devia-tions from Lorentz covariance can be discoveredby measuring any ordinary expectation value.
Another potential perturbation arises becausethe speed c =
√∂P/∂ρ varies over the cycle.
However, in the absence of external influences,the speed of a propagating wave is unperturbedbecause its leading edge cannot travel fasterthan the low amplitude speed, as is known forsound waves which obey similar equations [10].
Finally, a sonon might be perturbed by themean variation in c2 = ∂P
∂ρ. However, the effect
is third-order, as can be seen by expanding P (ρ)in terms of s = (ρ − ρo)/ρo: the mean of ∂P
∂ρ
is only perturbed by the odd-order terms, start-ing with s3. Even if the effect were to rise abovenoise levels, we will see it would be manifested asan adjustment to the effective mass of the quasi-particle, which would be difficult to distinguishfrom other effects such as thermal energy.
It follows that all ordinary expectation valuesare Lorentz covariant to a very good approxima-tion at all amplitudes.
3 Equations of motion
From (5), ∇2ψo = 0 and ∂2
∂t2ψo = −ω2
oψo. Wehave seen the sonon is Lorentz covariant to avery good approximation, so this must be aspecial case of a Lorentz covariant relationshipwhich is velocity-independent, namely
∂2ψ
∂t2− c2∇2ψ = − ω2
oψ (10)
which is analogous to the Klein-Gordon equationfor a relativistic particle. At low velocity, (10)can be approximated by defining ψ = e−iωotψ′
and neglecting ∂2
∂t2ψ′, giving
i~∂ψ′
∂t+
~2
2m∇2ψ′ = V ψ′ (11)
where, in a change of units to match convention,we have defined m = ~ω
c2and V is a constant.
This is analogous to the Schrodinger equationfor motion in a constant potential.
To complete the description, applying aLorentz boost to the density pattern Rmn in (6)and neglecting its time dependence (which is sec-ond order in v) gives the same equation with rreplaced by r′ where r′x = γ(rx − vt), r′y = ryand r′z = rz. We will refer to this as χ(x). Its
4
peaks and troughs also move through space atthe velocity v, and consequently the sonon willremain aligned with them if it is unperturbed.This coherence is likely to be reinforced by non-linearities in the medium. We will first examinethe coherent case, and then examine the effectsof decoherence.
An expression for the velocity v in terms ofψ follows by applying a Lorentz boost to (5),giving ψ = AeiS where S = k.x − ωt and, fromthe Lorentz transformation, ω = γωo and k =(γωo/c
2)v. These combine to ~k = mv wherewe have defined m = ~ω
c2. This leads immediately
to
v =~m
Im
(∇ψψ
)(12)
The significance of this expression can be under-stood by following Bohm [12], who rearrangedthe Shrodinger equation into the form
∂|ψ|2
∂t+ ∇(|ψ|2v) = 0 (13)
where v is given by (12). Bohm noticed that (13)is the standard equation for a conserved quantitymoving at velocity v, and concluded that |ψ|2must be the probability (averaged over nearbytrajectories) that a hypothetical particle mov-ing at velocity v will pass through a given posi-tion at a given time. These particle trajectoriesare the same as those of sonons. However the re-sulting de Broglie-Bohm or ‘pilot wave’ model ofquantum mechanics [12, 13] describes only partof the motion of sonons because it omits the car-rier waves.
Suppose, conterfactually, that a sononchanges state and becomes de-localized in someunspecified way, and then suddenly rematerial-izes just before any measurement, without af-fecting the trajectory. It follows from the abovethat the probability of rematerialization at anygiven position must be |ψ|2. This is analogous tothe Copenhagen interpretation of quantum me-chanics, where the wavefunction and its collapseobey identical equations.
The foregoing can be described in the termi-nology of telecommunications theory. At veloci-ties significantly smaller than c, the wavelength
of χ (the carrier wave) is significantly shorterthan that of ψ (the modulation). Note that ψmust be complex-valued to describe both ampli-tude and phase.
A similar emergence of quantum phenomenafrom completely classical motion is exhibited bysmall droplets which are made to bounce on abath of the same liquid by oscillating the con-tainer vertically [5]. The droplet’s horizontalmotion is determined by nonlinear interactionswith the surface waves, which obey the waveequation and are a two-dimensional analogue ofthe disturbance ξ = χψ. The principal differ-ences are that the effective speed c might bemodified near the bouncing droplet due to themass of the droplet and amplitude-related ef-fects, and the experiment is a driven dissipativesystem rather than a lossless one. The videosshow the droplets maintaining phase coherencewith the surrounding waves due to nonlineari-ties. Single-slit diffraction, double-slit diffrac-tion, unpredictable tunnelling and quantized en-ergy levels are observed [6, 7, 8, 9].
A sonon may be modelled as a classical os-cillator of high Q. In interactions between suchoscillators, Mead shows that the sum of the fre-quencies is conserved, since otherwise the inter-action would average out to zero [14]. It followsfrom the definition E = ~ω (note, E is not thesame as energy in the fluid motion Efluid referredto above) that E is conserved. The conservationof momentum, defined by p = ~k, follows fromthe conservation of E and Lorentz covariance.
It follows from the above that the equations ofmotion for a sonon are completely classical, butthey reduce to the established equations for arelativistic quantum mechanical particle of mass~ωc2
if the carrier wave is neglected.
4 Long range force
In the bouncing droplet experiments [7], theedge of the container can be modelled asan image droplet bouncing antiphase, leavingthe meniscus undisturbed. Stroboscopic pho-tographs show a droplet moves in a straight line
5
until it approaches the edge, when it is deflectedaway. We interpret this to indicate a repulsiveforce from the antiphase image. Conversely, in-phase droplets form crystalline lattices, indicat-ing an attractive force.
A similar phenomenon in three dimensions isused for degassing oils by subjection to ultra-sonic vibration. As the bubbles expand and con-tract in response to the pressure waves, they in-duce flows in the fluid. When two bubbles are in-phase, no fluid will cross the mirror line betweenthem, from symmetry, but the flows parallel to itreinforce, resulting in a reduced Bernoulli pres-sure and a force of attraction. The bubbles con-sequently merge and rise to the surface.
The calculation of the force, adapted fromFaber’s textbook [10, §4.4], is as follows. If avacuum cleaner hose operates in the wind, itwill ingest momentum along with the air par-ticles, and experience a force F = ρoUQ1 whereQ1 is the flow and U the wind velocity. If thewind is due to a similar hose with flow Q2, thenU = Q2/(4πr
2), giving an inverse square forceof attraction
F = − ρoQ1Q2
4πr2(14)
The direction of flow, and of the force on bothhoses, will be reversed if one of them is set toblow (with a baffle for spherical symmetry). Ifboth are set to blow they will attract again.More generally, oscillatory motion results in anattractive force if it is in-phase, and a repulsionif it is antiphase. The phase alignment is mosteasily assessed from the flow across the mirrorline between the sources.
Turning to R11 sonons, their flows are shownin Figure 4 and their preferred alignments in Fig-ure 5. From the mirror symmetry in 5(a) there isno flow across the mirror line and consequentlysonons of opposite chiralities will attract one an-other. In 5(b) the direction of flow is reversedand like chiralites repel. The magnitude of theforce is calculated in the appendix by substitut-ing the idealised fluid flows of Figure 4(b) into(14) and calculating the cylinder’s acceleration
(a calculation which is only approximate)
F ≈ a2β2
64bC sin2(C)
~cr2
(15)
where a, b and β are defined in Figure 4, andC =
√k2rR
2o + 1. Substituting the estimates a ≈
b ≈ β ≈ 1 and krRo . 0.92 from (7) gives
F .1
49
~cr2
(16)
This inverse square force among R11 sonons andtheir chiral twins is analogous to the Coulombforce among electrons and positrons. The finestructure constant α . 1/49 matches the elec-tromagnetic value to the accuracy of calculation.
4.1 Radiation
The interaction in (16) can be generalized by ap-plying a Lorentz boost. We can borrow from theusual extension of the Coulomb force by requir-ing it to be Lorentz covariant, which producesMaxwell’s equations, as shown in the appendix.
Maxwell’s equations have solutions corre-sponding to propagating waves. We now showthese waves are emitted when a sonon is acceler-ated. Without loss of generality we will examineone component of Φ in (8).
If a sonon is made to oscillate so its positionis x = xo sin(Ωt), where xo is small, then substi-tuting into (4) gives (see the appendix)
ξ = ψwχw
where
ψw =ARo
rkrxo sin
[Ω(t− r
c
)]χw = B1 e−iωot cos(krr) cos Θ (17)
and Θ is the angle from the direction of oscilla-tion. Here ψw describes amplitude modulationof a carrier wave χw, but in general there will bephase modulation as well for larger amplitudemotion.
The momentum of the wave can be calculatedby writing (17) as a sum of propagating waves
χw =iB1
2[e−iωo(t+r/c) + e−iωo(t−r/c)] (18)
6
These propagating solutions can be extendedall the way to the particle (more precisely usinga sum of Hankel functions). Extended in thisway, they comprise the entire solution. Theirsum must have the same energy and momentumas the particle, at all velocities, which enablesa relationship between the energy Ew and mo-mentum pw of the waves to be calculated
pw =Ewc
See the appendix for the calculation. This alsoapplies to the radiating waves described above,which are a superposition of such waves. Noticethe analogue with light, which carries the samemomentum.
4.2 Constructive interference
In very shallow water on a sandy beach, thewave speed increases with depth, and a wavetravelling close behind another will propagate inthe deeper water of the wave in front and travelfaster, catching it up [10].
A similar effect will occur in the waves un-der consideration due to the speed c =
√∂P/∂ρ
varying over the cycle. The trailing wave will beperturbed by the wave in front, which remainsin phase over a long time, and therefore it doesnot cancel over a cycle. This effect is not an or-dinary expectation value (as defined in §2) andtherefore it is not precisely Lorentz covariant.
There is an analogy with light waves, whichalso tend to come into coherence, such as inlasers. The underlying components of the wavesin (18) will interfere constructively if one over-takes the other by about half a wavelength of thecarrier wave. For comparison, an oscillating elec-tron would have about 1012 half-wavelengths permetre in its carrier wave. On a crude model, twowaves of modulation will reach coherence afterabout 1m if the speed difference is ∆c ∼ 10−12c,which corresponds to about 0.0003ms−1.
5 Causality and localization
Euler’s equation is deterministic, and thereforechance and dice cannot be involved at a fun-damental level in the behaviour of sonons in aclosed system. The difficulty of predicting out-comes arises, among other causes, from errors oruncertainties in the initial measurements, whichare magnified in processes such as diffraction andtunnelling.
In a closed deterministic system, its state atsome time to completely dictates its state atsome other time t. This is true even when to > t,which could be interpreted non-causally. Suchsolutions are valid because Euler’s equation issymmetric under time reversal.
In practice, these coherent solutions are easilydisrupted by influences from outside the closedsystem. In particular, the coherence between asonon and its surrounding waves is fragile. Theprocess of decoherence is most easily picturedin the droplet experiments, where a disturbancecauses a droplet to bounce out of its local wavetrough, magnifying the effect of the perturba-tion.
Nevertheless, the time-reversed motions arevalid solutions if decoherence can be controlled.See Mead’s analysis [14] from first principleson the interactions between classical oscillatorsthrough forward and time-reversed waves whichare solutions to the (time-symmetric) wave equa-tion. Interacting sonons obey similar equations.Provided phase coherence can be maintainedduring the transition, Mead shows that the in-teraction produces effects which are closely anal-ogous to the quantisation of the photon, amongother observed phenomena.
Mead’s model is related to Cramer’s more gen-eral transactional interpretation of quantum me-chanics [15], which was designed to be consistentwith experiments on Bell’s inequality [16, 17, 18]by exploiting the property that the equations aresymmetric under time reversal. Cramer’s modelis completely local and time reversal symmetric,symmetries which are shared by Euler’s equa-tion. It might be possible to interpret the mo-tion of sonons (still consistent with experiments
7
on Bell’s inequality) in a different way, withoutneeding to invoke the time-reversal symmetry,by exploiting the fact that spin-related informa-tion is carried by the carrier waves. This trans-mission of information is not usually consideredin the interpretation of the experiments. See[19] for further discussion.
6 Conclusion
The irrotational motion of a compressible invis-cid fluid is studied in the field of analogue grav-ity, where there are phenomena related to gen-eral relativity and the standard model [1, 2, 3, 4].The main contribution of this paper has beento extend the analogy to quantum and electro-magnetic phenomena. We introduced the sonon,a quasiparticle with a twist, which behaves likea relativistic quantum mechanical particle withspin-1
2symmetry, and which experiences an in-
teraction, due ultimately to Bernoulli forces,that obeys Maxwell’s equations.
The number and precision of these analo-gies suggests there might be a wider explana-tion. One candidate arises from an argumentadvanced by Einstein in 1920 [20]. Unlike linearmotion, acceleration and rotation are intrinsi-cally discoverable. For example, a gyroscope’saxis tends to remain aligned with the distantstars. Believing all interactions to be local, Ein-stein reasoned these correlations between distantobjects must be mediated by a substance occu-pying the space between them, which he calleda “medium for the effects of inertia” or “ether ofthe general theory of relativity”. By requiringthe medium to be consistent with special rela-tivity he deduced that it cannot have any me-chanical properties if it is a solid or a semi-solid.
A fluid medium was not considered at thetime because it cannot support transverse waves,which were thought to be needed to model po-larised light. However, this assumption cannotbe justified because a compressible inviscid fluidsupports, not transverse waves, but waves ofmodulation which obey Maxwell’s equations.
These observations are consistent with the hy-
pothesis, which we now advance, that Einstein’sinertial medium behaves as a nonrelativisticbarotropically compressible inviscid fluid. Thehypothesis is testable because it predicts all ob-servable quantities are completely determinedby the solutions to Euler’s equation for such amedium.
The observable – and observed – quantitiesdescribed above in general relativity, particlesymmetries, quantum mechanics and electro-magnetism can be derived from this single hy-pothesis. In addition, it predicts that all ordi-nary expectation values (as defined in §2) mustbe Lorentz covariant to a very good approxi-mation at all amplitudes. This is consistentwith the original paper on special relativity [21],which specifies that the postulates apply to thespeed of light in empty space and the phenom-ena of electrodynamics and mechanics (we inter-pret this to refer to the corresponding ordinaryexpectation values). However, our hypothesis isnot consistent with a possible extension to theoriginal postulates, in which all motion is pre-sumed to be Lorentz covariant. In particular,there are rare expectation values which do notaverage over a cycle but still have observableconsequences. These are not precisely Lorentzcovariant and, as described in §4.2, such devia-tions contribute to, or may be responsible for,the coherence effects observed in lasers.
The calculation of the fine structure constantmight be improved by computer simulation andcompared to the observed electromagnetic value.The families of quasiparticles and the redshiftnear a massive body in §1.3 might be studiedfurther and related to analogue gravity.
I warmly thank Andrew McLachlan, KeithMoffatt, Graziano Brady, Peter Landrock, andespecially Robin Ball and Ross Anderson for im-mensely helpful comment and discussion.
References
[1] C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser. Ana-logue gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity,14(3), 2011.
8
[2] WG Unruh. Experimental black-holeevaporation? Physical Review Letters,46(21):1351–1353, 1981.
[3] O. Lahav, A. Itah, A. Blumkin, C. Gordon,S. Rinott, A. Zayats, and J. Steinhauer. Re-alization of a sonic black hole analog in aBose-Einstein condensate. Physical reviewletters, 105(24):240401, 2010.
[4] G E Volovik. The Universe in a HeliumDroplet. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003.
[5] Y. Couder, S. Protiere, E. Fort, andA. Boudaoud. Dynamical phenomena:Walking and orbiting droplets. Nature,437(7056):208–208, 2005.
[6] Y. Couder and E. Fort. Single-particlediffraction and interference at a macro-scopic scale. Physical review letters,97(15):154101, 2006.
[7] S. Protiere, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder.Particle-wave association on a fluid in-terface. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,554(10):85–108, 2006.
[8] A. Eddi, E. Fort, F. Moisy, and Y. Couder.Unpredictable tunneling of a classical wave-particle association. Physical review letters,102(24):240401, 2009.
[9] E. Fort, A. Eddi, A. Boudaoud,J. Moukhtar, and Y. Couder. Path-memoryinduced quantization of classical orbits.Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, 107(41):17515–17520, 2010.
[10] T E Faber. Fluid dynamics for physi-cists. Cambridge University press, Cam-bridge, UK, 1995.
[11] M. Bennett, M.F. Schatz, H. Rockwood,and K. Wiesenfeld. Huygens’s clocks. Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of London,458:563–579, 2002.
[12] D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of thequantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ vari-ables. Physical Review, 85(2):166, 1952.
[13] D.Z. Albert. Bohm’s alternative to quan-tum mechanics. Scientific American,270:58–67, 1994.
[14] C A Mead. Collective Electrodynamics:quantum foundations of electromagnatism.MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, 2000.
[15] J.G. Cramer. The transactional interpre-tation of quantum mechanics. Reviews ofModern Physics, 58(3):647, 1986.
[16] J.S. Bell. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosenparadox. Physics, 1(3):195–200, 1964.
[17] A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger. Ex-perimental test of Bell’s inequalities usingtime-varying analyzers. Physical review let-ters, 49(25):1804–1807, 1982.
[18] J.S. Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable inQuantum Mechanics: Collected papers onquantum philosophy. Cambridge UniversityPress, 2004.
[19] R.J. Anderson and R.M. Brady. Why quan-tum computing is hard – and quantumcryptography is not provably secure. ArXiv[quant-ph]1301.7351, 2013.
[20] A. Einstein. Ether and the theory of rela-tivity. The Genesis of General Relativity,pages 1537–1542, 2007.
[21] A. Einstein. On the electrodynamicsof moving bodies. Annalen der Physik,17(891):50, 1905.
9
Appendices
A Symbols
Symbol Meaning
(x, t) Cartesian coordinates(r, θ, s) Cylindrical coordinatesφ Angle around torus
P (x, t) Fluid pressureu(x, t) Fluid velocityρ(x, t) Fluid densityρo Mean fluid densityξ(x, t) Excess density
defined by ρ/ρo = 1 +Re(ξ)c Speed of propagation
defined by c2 = ∂P/∂ρ
Jm(r) Cylindrical Bessel functionof the first kind
jm(r) Spherical Bessel functionof the first kind
Rmn Spatial dependence of a sonon
v Velocity of Lorentz boost
γ Lorentz factor 1/√
1− v2/c2
ψ(x, t) Copenhagen wavefunctionχ(x, t) Carrier wave ξ = χψ(ω,k) Angular frequency, wavevector
B Flow pattern of an eddy
The article discusses a solution to Euler’s equa-tion at low amplitude, given by
ξ = A e−i(ωot+mθ−kss) Jm(krr)
where here, and throughout this appendix, thesymbols have the meanings in the table above.
At low amplitude the quadratic term inEuler’s equation can be neglected, givingρo∂u/∂t = −∇P . Substituting the definitionc2 = ∂P/∂ρ gives ρo∂u/∂t = c2∇ρ or
u =c2
ρo
∫∇ρ dt (19)
This flow is irrotational [10], as can be seenby rearranging (19) into the form u = ∇φ whereφ = c2
∫s dt where s = (ρ− ρo)/ρo.
Stagnation point
+-
Centre of eddy
Fluid flow
+ Density maximum (+) or minimum (-)
Cross-section
Figure 6: Flow pattern of an eddy (equation 3where m = 1 and ks = 0) at the instant t = 0
Figure 6 sketches the flow pattern near suchan eddy with m = 1, which can be calculated byexpressing (19) in cylindrical coordinates
ur =
∫c2
ρo
∂ρ
∂rdt
uθ =
∫c2
ρor
∂ρ
∂θdt
Substituting into (3) and integrating gives
ur = Ac2
ωo
∂
∂rJm(krr) sin(ωot+mθ − kss)
uθ = Ac2
ωo
m
rJm(krr) cos(ωot+mθ − kss)
In Figure 6 the x axis is aligned with θ = 0and the flow pattern is sketched at the instantt = s = 0. The flow is stationary at thepoints marked with a small dot on the diagram.On the x-axis this stationary flow occurs whenJ1(krr) = 0, or krx = 3.83, 7.01, 10.71... Onthe y-axis it occurs when (∂/∂r)J1(krr) = 0, orkry = 1.84, 5.33, 8.53...
10
C A sonon as a sum of
spherical harmonics
A sonon is obtained by curving an eddy (3) intoa ring. This is a good description at small r, butthe curvature of the s axis makes the analysismore difficult at larger r. We now describe asolution to the wave equation which behaves inthe same way at large distance, and uses moretractable coordinates.
s σ
θr
Figure 7: The coordinates used in (20)
In the coordinates of Figure 7, we begin byshowing that
Jm(r) =
∫ ∞−∞
jm(σ) ds (r →∞) (20)
Expanding the spherical Bessel function atlarge distance, the dominant term is
jm(σ) =1
σsin(σ −mπ
2
)(r →∞)
The integral in (20) can be evaluated by Fres-nel’s method, that is, using
σ = r
(1 +
s2
2r2
)(r →∞)
Choosing m = 0, in the first instance, gives theFresnel integral
∫jm(σ) ds ≈ 1
r
∫ ∞−∞
sin
(r +
s2
2r
)ds (r →∞)
which evaluates to
∫jm(σ) ds ≈ −
√2
πrcos(r +
π
4
)(r →∞)
which is the same as the largest term in the ex-pansion of the cylindrical Bessel function. Itmay be verified that this is true for all valuesof m.
This demonstrates (20). Substituting into theequation (3) for an eddy gives
ξ =
∫ ∞−∞
Ae−i(ωot+mθ−kss)jm(krσ) krds (21)
The substitution is valid in the case ks = 0, andthe equivalence of the two expressions for ks 6= 0follows by applying a Lorentz boost.
When m = 0 or 1, which are the cases of inter-est in the article, the Legendre polynomial Pmreduces to Pm(cosθ) = cos(mθ) and the inte-grand is a solution to the wave equation. Forlarger values of m an expansion in terms of Leg-endre polynomials is required.
Given that the integrand is a solution to thewave equation, the path of integration need notbe restricted to a straight line. Any path of in-tegration, corresponding to any curving of theeddy, can be taken, and the result will still bea solution to the wave equation (strictly speak-ing, an approximation is involved if ks 6= 0 be-cause we have used a Lorentz boost in the abovederivation, which is restricted to a straight line,but we will neglect the perturbation).
In the coordinates of Figure 3, replacing kss in(21) by nφ because the motion must be single-valued gives
ξ = A e−iωot Rmn
Rmn ≈∫e−i(mθ
′−nφ)jm(krσ) Rodφ
which are the equations used in the article.
D Spin symmetry
The main text shows that the density patternassociated with a R11 sonon has the symmetryof the Pauli matrices. A possible physical inter-pretation of the associated spin-half symmetryis as follows.
11
It is shown in the main text that two iden-tical sonons have a preferred alignment wherethere is an antinode of density between themand their spins are opposed. Refer to Figure8, which considers the effect of rotating such apair in space whilst maintaining this alignment.It may be noted that one complete rotation asdrawn reverses the sign of the density pattern.This symmetry may be relatred to the spin-halfsymmetry associated with the Pauli matrices.
+ +
+ +
+ +
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 8: Two R11 sonons maintaining theirpreferred alignment (with an antinode betweenthem), drawn as if they were close to one an-other for clarity. A complete rotation is pro-duced by the following idealised steps: (a) theblue sonon remains stationary whilst the whiteone rolls around it by half a turn, as if lockedby gears, producing (b). The entire structurethen rotates rigidly through a further half turn,producing (c). Observe the sign is reversed afterwhat is effectively a complete rotation.
E Dirac equation
The expressions related to the Pauli matrices inthe main text can be written in Cartesian coor-dinates at large r
i σj .∂Φ
∂xj= ± krΦ (22)
where σj are the Pauli matrices and summationover j is implied. The contributions from the an-
gular components have been neglected becauseof the term 1
rwhich appears when transforming
the angular components from spherical to Carte-sian coordinates.
Notice that (22) is analogous to the Diracequation in the case of a stationary particle,where the time derivative is assumed to vanish.
The main text shows that the irrotational so-lutions to Euler’s equation are Lorentz covariantto a very good approximation at all amplitudes.Consequently (22) can be generalised to an equa-tion which applies at all velocities, by writing itin a Lorentz covariant form (using the procedurewhich is shown in detail in the main text for ascalar field). It may be noted that there is ananalogue with the Dirac equation, which is alsoLorentz covariant and reduces to (22) when sta-tionary.
F Fluid energy near a sonon
Here we obtain an approximate expression forthe kinetic and potential energy in the fluid mo-tion within a sphere of radius R of a sonon.
In the main text it is shown that the densitypattern at large distance from a sonon is givenapproximately by
Rmn ≈ RoB.Φ
where B is of order 1. Here we will calculate theenergy for the term Φ = sin(krr)/r (the termin cos(krr)/r behaves the same), replacing theconstants which are of order 1, A and B, simplyby 1.
The amplitude of these standing waves is∆ρ = ρoRo/r at their peak. Substituting intothe fluid speed [10], which is c∆ρ/ρo, gives
upeak ≈Ro
rc
The kinetic energy density ρou2/2 is equalled
by the potential energy density when averagedover a cycle, and so the total energy inside asphere of radius R is
Efluid =
∫ R
0
4πr2ρou2dr
12
The spatial integral gives a factor of 1/2, andaveraging over time gives another factor of 1/2giving
Efluid ≈ πR2o R ρoc
2
which is the equation used in the main text.
G Boundary condition:
coupling mechanism
In the main text, it is shown that the energy inthe waves surrounding a sonon is given by (9),which will be minimised if sonons align them-selves so their waves interfere destructively atlarge distance. Here we describe a couplingmechanism which allows this lowest energy stateto be reached. Huygens discovered a similarmechanism in pendulum clocks in 1665 [11].
Two similar sonons will behave as oscillatorswhich are weakly coupled through he nonlinearterm in Euler’s equation. They will consequentlyhave two modes of coupled oscillation, in-phaseand antiphase, of frequencies
f = fo ± ν (23)
where ν depends on the strength of the coupling.
If both modes in (23) are present, there willbe a component of motion at the difference fre-quency 2ν, which will be coupled to longitudinalwaves by the nonlinear term in Euler’s equa-tion. The lower energy state can be reachedby these waves carrying energy away, whichwill be favoured because of entropy considera-tions (assuming a low temperature at large dis-tance). The mechanism will be efficient becausethe waves have a frequency which is significantlydifferent from the natural frequency fo of thenearby sonons of a given type, and so they willhave a long mean free path.
Notice that this mechanism will also have theeffect of locking together the frequencies of thesonons of similar types in a local region, evenif they initially have slightly different sizes andfrequencies.
H Redshift near a massive
body
In the main text it is shown that the sononsnear a massive body become enlarged and theirfrequencies redshifted. These are still solutionsto Euler’s equation, since if ξ(x, t) is a solutionthen so is ξ(ax, at) where a is a scale factor. Inunits where a = 1 at large distance, then a < 1near the body.
Here we outline a possible relationship be-tween this redshift and the gravitational forceswhich are studied in analogue gravity. The treat-ment here uses the analogue with quantum me-chanical and classical motion which is set out inthe main text, and it is only intended to applyat large distance.
In a uniform situation, the frequency f of thesonons of a particular type at any given positionwill be the average of the frequencies in the vicin-ity, due to transport processes, giving ∇2f = 0.This applies to all types of sonons and therefore
∇2a = 0
The spherically symmetric solution to thisequation can be written in the form
a = 1− 2ror
where ro is to be found.A test particle will be perturbed by this field,
since its frequency will be redshifted by a due tothe Huygens correlation discussed in §G. Thiscorresponds to the relationship
ω = ωo
(1− 2ro
r
)and multiplying by ~ gives an equivalent ex-
pression for the energy perturbation, which ispropotional to the natural frequency or inertialmass of the sonon and inversely proportional todistance.
At large distance, this perturbation corre-sponds to an inverse square force proportionalto the inertial mass of the test particle. Fromthe conservation of momentum there must be an
13
equal force on the attracting object, and, fromsymmetry, it must be proportional to the prod-uct of the inertial masses. This is analogous toNewton’s law of gravitation. The effects of theredshift have been neglected and consequentlythis is only true at large distance.
I Analogue of the Coulomb
force
Here we calculate the fluid dynamical force be-tween two stationary R11 sonons when they arein their preferred alignment shown in Figure 5.
We will also use the calculation of the fluiddynamical force between two identical sourcesor sinks of magnitude Q which are distance rapart, which is found in Faber’s textbook [10,§4.5]:-
F = ρoQ2
4πr2
The flow pattern near a R11 sonon is sketched inFigure 4(a). There is a region where the flowsreinforce and the nonlinearity is significant. Thiswill be modelled as a cylinder as shown in Figure4(b). Density variations are rolled up into theeffective mean flow speed.
In this idealisation, the external flow derivesfrom a source and a sink at the ends of the cylin-der in Figure 4(b), each of magnitude
Qi = ± π(aRo
2
)2βc
2(24)
These sources and sinks rotate with the sononat angular speed ωo. When viewed from largedistance in the x direction the flows cancel oneanother at the instant shown, as may be seenfrom the symmetry in Figure 4. However, whenviewed from large positive y there will be incom-plete cancellation at the instant shown becauseof the time delays associated with informationcrossing the structure as it rotates. The incom-plete cancellation is quantified by the approxi-mate factor
cos
(ωo
[t− bRo
c
])− cos
(ωo
[t+
bRo
c
])
and the resulting effective source becomes
Q =πa2R2
o
8βc 2 sin(ωot) sin(ωobRo/c) (25)
Substituting into (14) gives the force betweenthese sonons
F =ρo
64r2πa4R4
oβ2c2 sin2(ωot) sin2
(b ωoRo
c
)Now, sin2(ωot) averages to 1/2 over a cycle, andthe volume of the cylinder is V = πa2bR3
o/2,giving the mean force
F =1
64r2a2
bρoV β
2c2 Ro sin2
(b ωoRo
c
)(26)
The force produces an acceleration a = F/mwhere m is the mass of the fluid in the cylin-der (where the nonlinearities are concentrated),which can be estimated as ρoV neglecting den-sity fluctuations. In the corresponding calcula-tion of the attraction between bubbles which aresubjected to ultrasonic vibration, the motion ofthe displaced fluid and the associated dressedmass is also taken into account [10]. This wouldgive an additional factor of order 1/2, but weneglect it for simplicity, and it is likely to com-pensate for our neglecting density fluctuations.Thus we will use the approximate value
a =F
ρoV
Expressed in conventional units, Fc =(~ω/c2)a. Substituting into (26) gives
Fc =a2β2
64b
~ωoRo
r2sin2
(b ωoRo
c
)(27)
For a linear eddy, ω2o = c2(k2r + k2s), as dis-
cussed in the main text. For a R11 sonon, whichhas one twist around the torus, ks = 1/Ro ap-proximately, and so
ωoRo = c√k2rR
2o + 1
Substituting into (27) gives
Fc = −a2β2
64bC sin2(C)
~cr2
where C =√k2rR
2o + 1. This is used in the main
text, dropping the unnecessary suffix c.
14
J Analogue of Maxwell’s
equations
The inverse square force in (15) has been cal-culated for stationary quasiparticles. Here weextend it to moving quasiparticles by using thesymmetry that the solutions are Lorentz covari-ant. Our calculation is analogous to the usualextension of the Coulomb force to all veloci-ties, and it will be no surprise that the result-ing equations are analogous to Maxwell’s equa-tions. Whilst this function is formal, this sectionmay nevertheless be of interest because, alongthe way, it also obtains the Lagrangian from theproperties of a sonon in a transparent way, andit makes explicit the analogue between the phaseof a sonon and the quantum mechanical phasewhich is measured in a superconductor using theJosephson effect.
The force in (15) is curl-free, so it can be writ-ten as a potential gradient, F = q∇Φ. Thequantity q is analogous to the charge on a testparticle and Φ to the sum of the potentials dueto all other charges.
Using Newton’s second law in the form
−∇ω =∂k
∂t
gives q∇Φ = ~∂k/∂t = ~∇(∂S/∂t) where S isthe phase of the sonon, which integrates to
∂S
∂t=
qΦ
~+ constant (28)
This key equation is analogous to the phase evo-lution in a charged superconductor, which obeysthe same equation with q = −2e and which ismeasured experimentally using the Josephson ef-fect
A sonon moving between two fixed events suf-fers a phase change which must be stationarywith respect to path variations. There wouldbe destructive interference if this were not so.In free space the phase change is ∆S = Eoτ/~where τ is the proper time measured in a co-moving frame. In a stationary frame, ~∆S =∫
(Eo +T )dt, where T = (γ− 1)Eo is the kineticenergy.
This motion will be perturbed by the interac-tion in (28). Defining the Lagrangian
L = T − qΦthen ~∆S =
∫(Eo + L)dt. If this phase dif-
ference is stationary with respect to path vari-ations, δ(~∆S) = 0, then the Euler-Lagrangerelationship d/dt(∂L/∂vi) = ∂L/∂xi reduces to
dp
dt= − q∇Φ
which recovers Newton’s second law for a par-ticle of charge q near stationary electrostaticcharges.
Equation (28) can be extended to a movingsystem by exploiting the symmetry that the so-lutions are Lorentz covariant. The Lorentz co-variant 4-vector is(
1
c
∂S
∂t,∇S
)=
Q
~
(Φ
c,A
)+ Γ
Notice that A is analogous to the magneticvector potential and Γ the gauge. In a coherentsystem, the phase change around a loop must bequantised, so that∮
∇Sdl =Q
~
∮Adl = 2nπ
where n is an integer. This is analogous to theflux quantisation which is observed in a super-conductor.
The force in (15) is inverse square, and in gen-eral such forces obey, in suitable units,
−εo ∇2Φ = ρc
where the charge density ρc represents thesources. This equation can also be extended intoa Lorentz covariant form in the usual way, giving(
∇2 − 1
c2∂2
∂t2
)Φ = − ρc
εo
Likewise, extending the density to a 4-currentgives, more generally,(
∇2 − 1
c2∂2
∂t2
)A = − µoJ
where J is the current. These are analogousto Maxwell’s equations for the electromagneticfield.
15
K Radiation from an oscil-
lating sonon
As discussed in the main text, the density pat-tern of a sonon at large distance is given, withoutloss of generality, by
ξ = AB1 e−iωot
Ro
rsin(krr) (29)
If a sonon oscillates so its position is x =xo sin(Ωt) where xo is small and its velocity ofmotion is much less than c, then this becomes
ξ = AB1 e−iωot
Ro
rsin[kr(r + r′)]
where
r′ = xo cos(Θ) sin[Ω(t− r
c
)]and Θ is the angle from the direction of oscilla-tion. This may be written in the form ξ = χwψwwhere for low amplitude motion, using the firstterm in the Taylor series expansion in krxo
ψw =ARo
rkrxo sin
[Ω(t− r
c
)]χw = B1 e−iωot cos(krr) cos Θ
Notice that we have chosen to distribute the fac-tors so that ψw is a solution to the wave equationin its own right. This distribution differs (on atechnicality) from that used for a sonon. Theseare the equations used in the main text.
L Energy and momentum
of a wave
This appendix calculates the ratio of energy tomomentum for a wave associated with a particle.
When at rest, the energy of a particle is E =~ωo so each of the outgoing and incoming wavesmust have energy Ew = ~ωo/2. This equivalencealso applies after a Lorentz boost. In the case ofparallel motion, the frequencies of the outgoingand incoming waves are Doppler shifted to ωoD
and ωo/D respectively, where the Doppler shiftis
D =
√c+ v
c− vThe total energy in this case is ~ωo(D +
1/D)/2 = γ~ωo, which matches the energy ofthe moving particle. A similar calculation forperpendicular motion shows this equivalence tobe independent of direction.
A similar consideration applies to momentum.Suppose the momentum of each wave is pw =βEw = β~ωo where β is to be determined. Whenat rest, the waves have opposite momenta sothe total momentum vanishes. A Lorentz boostchanges this to p = β~ωo(D − 1/D) = 2βEv.This must be the momentum of the particle,p = Ev/c2, and therefore 2β = 1/c2 and
pw =Ewc
16