The Intra-Arab

Oil War

1950-1970

Iakovos Alhadeff

Table of Contents

Oil Rich and Oil Poor Arabs

Gamal Nasser

The Oil Pipelines

2

Oil-Rich & Oil-Poor Arabs

Egypt and Syria are two Arab countries of the East Mediterranean Sea.

Actually Egypt is the largest and most important country of the Arab

world. The two countries have some oil and natural gas reserves, but their

reserves are peanuts when compared to the reserves of the Arab countries

of the Persian Gulf i.e. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait,

Qatar. At the following two tables of the Energy Information

Administration you can see the 10 richest countries in oil and natural gas

reserves.

Natural Gas

Oil

3

Natural gas is given in billion cubic feet, and needs to be divided by 35 in

order to be converted to billion cubic meters, and oil is given in billions

of barrels. As you can see there are 4 Arab countries in the natural gas top

ten, and another 5 in the oil top ten. I believe that shale oil and shale gas

are also included in the reserves, and that’s why USA ranks 4 th in the list

of the richest countries in natural gas reserves.

Gamal Nasser

Gamal Nasser was a socialist army officer in the Egyptian army. In 1952

Nasser, together with other Egyptian army officers, overturned the

Egyptian King. Eventually Nasser became Egypt’s president, and he

established a one party political system. Nasser, like all socialists, greatly

admired looked upon the Soviet Union, and he moved Egypt away from

4

the west and towards the Soviet Union. Nasser could not accept that

Egypt, the most important Arab country, was so poor in oil and natural

gas reserves, and his dream was for Egypt to gain control of the Persian

Gulf oil.

In order to achieve his goal, Nasser used Pan-Arabism as his main

ideology. Pan-Arabism was calling all Arabs to unite in one socialist

country. Nasser was hopping to unite all Arabs in one country, under

Egypt’s control. That way Egypt would control the oil of the Arab world.

In order to protect their oil from Nasser, the Arabs of the Persian Gulf

used Pan-Islamism as their ideology. Pan-Islamism asked Muslims to be

united in one country under the Islamic Law.

Under Pan-Islamism Saudi Arabia was hoping to be the leader, since

Mecca and Medina are in Saudi Arabia. Prophet Mohamed was born in

Mecca and buried in Medina, and for the Muslims these cities are the two

holiest cities in the world. Therefore under Pan-Islamism Saudi Arabia

would have an advantage over Egypt. On the other hand religion would

only play a minor role under Nasser’s socialism, and therefore Egypt

would have an advantage, because Nasser was promising to redistribute

the oil of the Persian Gulf.

In 1958, Egypt and Syria managed to become one country under Nasser’s

leadership. The two countries formed the United Arab Republic. The

Syrians surrendered their sovereignty to Egypt, hoping that the oil rich

Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, under Nasser’s pressure, sooner or

later would have to join the new country. Therefore the Syrian people

would enjoy some of the oil profits. In 1958 the Iraqi socialists managed

to overturn the Iraqi monarch too. The problem was that the new Iraqi

5

president, Abd al-Karim Qasim, was not willing to surrender to Egypt the

control of Iraq’s oil, and he was not willing to join Egypt and Syria in the

United Arab Republic.

Gamal Naser and Abd al-Karim Qasim became enemies, and Egypt and

Iraq had very problematic relations during this period. Iraq’s refusal to

join Egypt and Syria was a great disappointment for the Syrian people,

because they had surrendered their sovereignty to Egypt, in return for oil

profits. And now they were seeing that their sacrifice was for nothing,

because even though a radical socialist came in power in Iraq, a man who

aligned his country with the Soviet Union, there was no benefit for Syria.

That caused great disappointment in Syria, and in 1961 Egypt and Syria

became again two independent states. Gamal Nasser was furious, but he

preferred not to intervene militarily in Syria, because he did not want

Arab blood on his hands.

In 1963, Abd al-Karim Qasim was assassinated in Iraq, and the socialists

that came to power started again discussing with Egypt and Syria the

possibility of a union between the three countries, but this time under a

federation, which meant that Iraq would not have to surrender to Nasser

the control of its oil. However the discussion collapsed at some point and

nothing happened. The thing with the Iraqis was that even though they

did not really want to share their oil with the Egyptians and the Syrians,

they needed Syria and Egypt, because they were encircled by American

allies, as you can see at the following map. Remember that Iran was an

American ally until 1979 and the Islamic revolution. The Iraqis needed

the Egyptians and the Syrians, in order to reach the Mediterranean Sea

and sell their oil without having to cross the Persian Gulf and the Red

Sea.

6

The Oil Pipelines

You can also see on the map that Israel and Lebanon were a thorn in the

eyes of Egypt and Syria. If Egypt and Syria had managed to conquer

Israel and Lebanon, they could have blocked the exit of the oil pipelines

of the Arabs of the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea, and they could

have asked for a greater share of the oil profits. Israel and Lebanon were

significantly reducing the geopolitical significance of Egypt and Syria.

At the following map, with the red line, you can see a rough sketch of the

Trans Arabian Pipeline, which operated from 1947 to 1982. This was the

largest pipeline of its time, and it crossed the Golan Heights in order to

reach Lebanon and the Mediterranean Sea. The Golan Heights were

7

under Syrian control until 1967, when they came under Israeli control. It

is said that 30% of the oil that the Saudi ARAMCO has ever sold, has

been sold through the Trans Arabian Pipeline. Gradually, with the

construction of the large oil tankers, which could carry huge volumes of

oil, the pipeline became less important, and it was abandoned in 1982.

That’s why Nasser was Israel’s greatest enemy, and that’s why Syria

never recognized Lebanon. Syria always claimed that Lebanon was a part

of Syria. If Syria and Egypt had managed to eliminate Israel and Lebanon

they would have drastically increased their geopolitical importance, and

they could have asked for a much larger portion of the oil profits. It was

only in 2008 that Syria and Lebanon accepted to establish diplomatic

relations. I guess the reason is that Iran, Syria’s main ally, is financing

Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hezbollah is playing an increasingly important

role in Lebanon. Moreover, Iran brought forward the project of the Iran-

Iraq-Syria-Lebanon Pipeline.

8

And like all that was not enough for Egypt and Syria in the 60s, Israel and

Iran agreed on the Eilat-AShkelon Pipeline. Eilat is the only Israeli port

that gives Israel access to the Red Sea. The Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline

would carry Iranian oil to the Mediterranean Sea, avoiding Egypt and the

Suez Canal, and also avoiding Syria. For a rough map of the Eilat-

Ashkelon Pipeline see the following map.

Nasser could not accept all that, and in 1967 he decided to close the

Straits of Tiran to Israel, sending at the same time many army units at the

Sinai Peninsula. By closing the Straits of Tiran, Nasser was basically

blocking the Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline. However Israel, supported by the

Americans, attacked Egypt and Syria, and during the Six Days War, the

Israelis took the Sinai Peninsula and the Golan Heights. Therefore the

Eilat- Askhelon Pipeline Company was established in 1968, and at the

same time the piece of the Trans Arabian Pipeline that was passing

9

through the Golan Heights was no longer under Syrian control. For the

Golan Heights see the following Wikipedia map.

At another geographic location, in North Africa, Nasser could not

blackmail Algeria and Libya, at least not in the same way that he could

blackmail the Arabs of the Gulf. Even though the socialists took control

in Algeria and Libya, and they did aligned their countries with the Soviet

Union, they did not want to share their oil with Egypt and Syria. The

Algerians and the Libyans did not need Egypt and Syria in order to sell

their oil to the Europeans and the Americans. Because even though the

Algerian and Libyan socialists aligned their countries with the Soviet

Union, they could only sell their oil to the Europeans and the Americans.

Russia had, and still has, an abundance of oil.

Gamal Nasser died in 1970, without ever achieving to control the oil of

the Persian Gulf. However he had supporters in all Arab countries, and all

10

Arab leaders attended his funeral. The only Arab leader who did not

attend was the Saudi King. After all, Nasser was mainly after the Saudi

oil. I must also say that when Nasser was using Pan-Arabism, and the

socialists of the Persian Gulf, in order to attack the Arab monarchs of the

Persian Gulf, the Saudis were using Pan-Islamism and the Muslim

Brotherhood in Egypt, in order to attack Nasser. Therefore Nasser

designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

However nowadays, the Muslim Brotherhood is supported by Turkey and

Erdogan. Tayip Erdogan wishes to become the new Sultan of the

chaliphate. That way Turkey would play a greater role in the oil and

natural gas of the Persian Gulf. As a result the Saudis have designated the

Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. In a way Erdogan is for the

Saudis a new Nasser. Except that Erdogan is not a socialist, like Nasser

was, but he is an islamist. That does not mean that the Saudis and the

Turks cannot reach an agreement. That will depend on how much Turkey

wants.

You always hear intellectuals saying how complicated the Middle East is.

That’s a great lie. The Middle East is complicated only when oil and

natural gas is not based at the centre of the analysis. When oil and natural

gas are placed at the centre of the analysis the Middle East is the simplest

region in the world. There is only one rule in the Middle East, and that is

that the fastest gun takes the oil. But the intellectuals will not say that,

because their job, as Murray Rothbard and Ayn Rand were saying many

decades ago, is to convince us about how much we need the civil servants

that are paying them.

11