the impact of power plays in nhl hockey, or: no dogs play hockey
DESCRIPTION
The Impact of Power Plays in NHL Hockey, or: No Dogs Play Hockey. Jordan Pedersen, Tom Geiger, and Waleed Khoury. Some Background. A team is said to be on a power play when at least one opposing player is serving a penalty AND The team has a numerical advantage on the ice - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Impact of Power Plays in The Impact of Power Plays in NHL Hockey, or: NHL Hockey, or: No Dogs No Dogs
Play HockeyPlay Hockey
Jordan Pedersen, Tom Geiger, Jordan Pedersen, Tom Geiger, and Waleed Khouryand Waleed Khoury
Some BackgroundSome Background A team is said to be on a A team is said to be on a
power play when at least power play when at least one opposing player is one opposing player is serving a penalty ANDserving a penalty AND
The team has a The team has a numerical advantage on numerical advantage on the icethe ice
Whenever both teams Whenever both teams have the same number have the same number of penalties being of penalties being served, there is no served, there is no power playpower play
MethodologyMethodology Using League Data for Using League Data for
this season and the this season and the preceding four preceding four seasonsseasons
Focusing on Rankings Focusing on Rankings (based on points) and (based on points) and power play conversion power play conversion percentagespercentages
Regular SeasonRegular Season
Refresher on 2-Sample T Refresher on 2-Sample T TestTest
Used to analyze whether the difference in means Used to analyze whether the difference in means between two independent groups of data is between two independent groups of data is statistically significantstatistically significant
1-sample t-tests are for measuring the difference in 1-sample t-tests are for measuring the difference in mean for a single group versus a hypothesized meanmean for a single group versus a hypothesized mean
Use of the TestUse of the Test Test will be used to see if there is a Test will be used to see if there is a
statistically significant difference between statistically significant difference between power play conversion percentages for top power play conversion percentages for top 15 teams vs. bottom 15 teams (based on 15 teams vs. bottom 15 teams (based on their their PointPoint total) total)
Therefore, our question is…Therefore, our question is… Does the ability to convert power plays Does the ability to convert power plays
really affect a team’s ability to win games?really affect a team’s ability to win games?
Current SeasonCurrent Season Open up PP%Top and Bottom.mtwOpen up PP%Top and Bottom.mtw We’ll be doing 2008-2009We’ll be doing 2008-2009
A surpriiiiithe?A surpriiiiithe?
Mandatory Class ExerciseMandatory Class Exercise ¼ of the class does 2007-2008¼ of the class does 2007-2008 ¼ does 2006-2007¼ does 2006-2007 ¼ does 2005-2006¼ does 2005-200611
¼ does 2003-2004¼ does 2003-2004
1: Ties and dogs were banned after the 2004-2005 lockout1: Ties and dogs were banned after the 2004-2005 lockout
Relationship between Points Relationship between Points (Not Goals) and PP%(Not Goals) and PP%
Linear Regression ModelLinear Regression Model Remember, a team is awarded 2 Remember, a team is awarded 2
points if they win, 1 point if they lose points if they win, 1 point if they lose in OT/shootout, and 0 points if they in OT/shootout, and 0 points if they lose in regulationlose in regulation
2008-20092008-2009
PP%
P
2624222018161412
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
S 10.9875R-Sq 25.6%R-Sq(adj) 22.9%
Fitted Line PlotP = 44.03 + 1.975 PP%
2007-20082007-2008
PP%
P
25.022.520.017.515.0
120
110
100
90
80
70
S 9.68195R-Sq 16.8%R-Sq(adj) 13.9%
Fitted Line PlotP = 57.51 + 1.896 PP%
2006-20072006-2007
PP%
P
24222018161412
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
S 13.6885R-Sq 30.6%R-Sq(adj) 28.1%
Fitted Line PlotP = 32.40 + 3.356 PP%
2005-20062005-2006
PP%
P
222018161412
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
S 12.4745R-Sq 44.9%R-Sq(adj) 43.0%
Fitted Line PlotP = 6.66 + 4.802 PP%
2003-20042003-2004
PP%
P
22201816141210
110
100
90
80
70
60
S 14.9092R-Sq 12.5%R-Sq(adj) 9.4%
Fitted Line PlotP = 50.53 + 2.204 PP%
A Note on Our FailureA Note on Our Failure We tried to compare shooting We tried to compare shooting
percentages on and off a power play, percentages on and off a power play, but the NHL is skimpy (unhelpful) but the NHL is skimpy (unhelpful) when it comes to datawhen it comes to data
Shots on goal during power plays Shots on goal during power plays were unavailablewere unavailable
ConclusionsConclusions In In generalgeneral, better teams , better teams
tend to be better at tend to be better at converting power playsconverting power plays
But a direct correlation But a direct correlation was not to be foundwas not to be found
More sophisticated data More sophisticated data is needed from the is needed from the leagueleague
We attribute this lack of We attribute this lack of data to lack of dogs in data to lack of dogs in the NHLthe NHL
CitationsCitations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_pl
ay_(sport) Tommy, AJ, and Catherine’s Tommy, AJ, and Catherine’s
Presentation (for definition of 2-Presentation (for definition of 2-sample t tests)sample t tests)
Food For Thought…Food For Thought…
Why is this dog smoking Why is this dog smoking andand playing hockey? playing hockey? What statistical model would most accurately What statistical model would most accurately
predict this behavior?predict this behavior?