the future of ecco2r · •to minimize the risk of vili ( supernova) •to minimize invasiveness (...
TRANSCRIPT
The future of ECCO2Rmy guess
Antonio Pesenti
University of Milan
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan Italy
CCCF 2017
There are two kinds of forecasters:
those who don’t know, and those who don’t know they don’t know.
There are two kinds of forecasters:
those who don’t know, and those who
don’t know they don’t know.
John Kenneth Galbraith
Which Blood Flow?
• It depends: How much CO2 do we need to
remove? ( which patient?)
• Normally it is not advisable to remove all the CO2
content of blood ( pH problems)
• In any case we cannot remove more than the CO2
content of blood
PCO2 (mmHg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
pH
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8.0
8.2
8.4
BE = 0
BE = -10
BE = 10
http://www.acba.it/
PCO2 (mmHg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
TC
O2
(m
l%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
BE = 0
BE = -10
BE = 10
http://www.acba.it/
PCO2 (mmHg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
TC
O2
(m
l%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
BE = 0
BE = -10
BE = 10
http://www.acba.it/
ARDS
PCO2 (mmHg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
TC
O2
(m
l%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
BE = 0
BE = -10
BE = 10
http://www.acba.it/
ARDS
COPD
Blood Co2 content
PCO2
mmHg
pH Tot Co2
mMol/l
Ml CO2
80 7.11 27.87 624
80 7.30 41.87 938
Why should we remove CO2?
• To minimize the risk of VILI ( supernova)
• To minimize Invasiveness ( COPD)
• To control the respiratory drive and allow spontaneous
breathing (ARDS, COPD)
ECCO2R
• CO2 can be removed by
– Hemodialysis
– Hemofiltration
– Membrane lung ( by far the most common)
• CO2 removal enhanced by:
– Acidification
– Carbonic anhydrase
– Special geometry
CO2 Scavenging Phase
• Gas or fluid?
• Dialyzers or artificial lungs?
• Hemofilters?
• Acidic gases?
Performance
Oxygenator
Input:
37°C
Bovine blood
PCO2 45 mmHg1.8 sq M
Intermittent vs Continuous
• CO2 stores ?
• How fast will CO2 go back to the original levels?
• How should we manage Acid Base balance?
JAP 7 (5) :472-484: 1955
Vd CO2 = 250 l
Second Time Constant
Ivanov SD Respir Physiol 1968 ,5,243
Wearable Lungs vs
Wearable kidneys
• Implantable lungs?
Wang D ASAIO J 2003
Implantable Bioartificial lung
Scaffold
Stem cells
Blood flow resistance
Air supply
The future of CO2 removal
• Maximize CO2 removal from a given ( low) blood flow
• Minimize invasiveness
• Regional anticoagulation or NO anticoagulation
BF 500-1000 vs BF 200-250 ml/min
Sistemicanticoagulation:major complicationsduring ECCO2R
Regionalanticoagulation:
Optimize Membranes
• Maximize gas permeability
• Catalytic ( Carbonic Anhydrase)
• Biocompatible ( avoid clotting?)
Increasing CO2 removal fom blood
Acidification ( organic, Sulfur Dioxide)
Immobilized Carbonic Anhydrase
Exp. N°4 >> ML on dialysate circuit
Blood Flow250 ml/min
Lactic Acid2.5 mEq/min
Gas flow 10 l/min100% O2
Evaluating efficacy and safety of enhanced extracoropreal CO2
removal through acidification and ventilation of dialysate
Zanella, J Heart Lung Transplant 2014
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015
Respiratory Electrodialysis
Anticoagulation
• Regional?
• Heparin or Citrate? What else?
• Surface Heparinization, does it work?
Citric Acid / Citrate anticoagulation
• At least 3 mM ( 9 mEq) /l blood flowEach liter/min blood
flow
• That means an increase of 170.2 liters per day CO2
production, i.e. 118 ml/min in excess to baseline per liter
blood flow.
• Each 100/ml min of anticoagulated blood flow CO2
production will increase between 11.8 ( best case, glucose
baseline burning) and 14 ml ( worst case, fat burning)
ml/min
• At 200 ml/min CO2 production will increase 12%
approximately.
Zanella et al SHOCK, 46, pp. 304, 2016
ECCO2R
• Lower blood flows: easier
• Anticoagulation: more difficult
• Vascular access: not so good at this time
• Maximize amount of CO2 removal from
given blood flows
• Regional Anticoagulation
– Prostigmine
– Citrate