the flow of motivational interviewing spirit autonomy...
TRANSCRIPT
Spirit
Micro Skills
Change Talk Commitment Talk
Behaviour Change
Principles
Autonomy
Collaboration
EvocationExpress Empathy
Develop Discrepancy
Roll with resistance
Support Self-Efficacy Open ended questions
Affirm
Reflection
Summary
Desire
Ability
Reason
Need
Confidence
I will…
The Flow of Motivational Interviewing
Stages of Change Model
Prochaska & DeClemente
Around since 1979
DEFINITIONS: Brief interventions
• Brief interventions are “practices that aim to investigate a potential problem & motivate a client to begin to do something about his/her substance abuse, either by natural, client-directed means or by seeking additional substance abuse treatment
• A brief intervention is not a substitute for individuals Brief interventions are “practices that aim to investigate a potential with addiction/mental health disorder but can be used to engage clients to seek further help.
Status Quo or Change?
• Brief advice (usually less than 5
minutes) given opportunistically by a
health professional during routine
consultations with people who
smoke, whether or not they are
seeking help with stopping
Steps for Intervention
Cooperative
• ASK
• ADVISE
• ASSESS
• ASSIST
• ARRANGE FOFOLLOW
UP
Uncooperative
• RELEVANCE
• RISK
• REWARD
• ROAD BLOCK
• REPETITION
Skills Training before Eliciting Commitment to change
Because of variety of cognitive neurobiological social deficits particularly executive functioning in clients - adapt the traditional models to
• Brief sessions
• Slower question pace
• Pauses for questions
Some argue that client’s serious mental disorders cannot sustain intentional behaviour (following through with commitment) before they have the skills to do so
• Suggestion that skill training with client’s can enhance goal attainment = before any commitment to not using is reached
Bellack & Di Climente (1999)
BRIEF INTERVENTIONHow it works
•The phase-by-phase interventions from "denial" to "abstinence" or harm minimisation begin by assessing the client's readiness to engage & contemplate changeReadiness levels are accepted as starting points for treatment, rather than points of confrontation or criteria for elimination
Brief Intervention-Principles• The objective in the engagement phase - develop
comfortable & trusting relationships
• Information about aetiology & processes of illness in an empathic & educational manner
• The interaction effects between symptoms of mental illness & substance disorders, included in this exploration
• Clients are not required to disclose personal experiences or to admit they use or abuse substances until they are comfortable doing so
Can I get through this?
Feedback is given to the individual about personal risk or impairment
Responsibility for change is placed on the client
Advice to change is given by the provider
Menu of alternative self-help or treatment options is offered to the client
Empathic style is used in counselling
Self-efficacy or optimistic empowerment is engendered in the client
Source: Miller & Sanchez, 1993
A BI Model ‘FRAMES’
The Brief Negotiation Interview4 MAJOR STEPS
1) Raise The Subject
• Establish rapport
• Raise the subject of alcohol/other drug use
2) Provide Feedback• Review client’s drink/drug amounts & patterns
• Make connection between drink/drug & amount of hospital, or doctor’s visit, or trouble with mental health (if applicable)
• Compare client’s level of drink/drug with national norms
The Brief Negotiation Interview4 MAJOR STEPS cont……..
3) Enhance Motivation
• Assess readiness to change
• Develop discrepancy between patient’s drink/drug
& problems or potential problems related to
alcohol/drugs
4) Negotiate & Advise
• Negotiate goal
• Give advice
• Summarise & complete drink/drug agreement
A Brief Intervention…1. Introducing the issue in the context of the client's
health
2. Screening, evaluating, & assessing
3. Providing feedback
4. ‘Change Talk’ Talking about change & setting goals
5.Summarising & reaching closure
Providers may not use all five of these components in every session- reflect the needs of the client.
Must be good reason to eliminate steps in the brief intervention process
Socratic Enquiry: Introducing the Issue
• Would you be willing to talk to me briefly about how alcohol/drug fits into your life? Whatever we talk about will remain confidential."
• Or, "This must be tough for you. Would it be OK with you if we take a few minutes to talk about your drug/drinking?"
• "Would it be OK with you if we discuss some of the difficulties you may have because of your drinking/drug use meetings
• May be we can work together to help you take advantage of getting the balance back in your life through a supportive treatment process?"
Exaggeration Question
• ‘Would you have drunk 6 bottles of whisky (or
50 joints) this week?’
• “Because of your drinking did you stop taking your medication for ten days?”
Sampling Sobriety
• “a 2-week trial when you don't drink alcohol at all would be helpful in determining whether or not drinking makes things worse and if stopping use works for you. What do you think?"
What we can do?• ACKNOWLEDGE-your
problem/do not neglect it
• ASK-for help/do not
worry/panic.talk to family
member/professional
• ALLOW-yourself to develop
alternative activities/hobbies
• If you come across
Sextortion:do not delete any
evidence-chat,mails,image or
recording
• Do not give in to demands
• Talk to family /counselor or
seek help
• Life style changes are
easy to achieve
• Start working on their
sleep, appetite, out
door activities ,
communication (for
decrease indulgence
in pornography) &
relaxing exercise if
usages exceed more
than hour
• School can work
on explaining:
• Relevance of
control use
• Reward associated
with control use
• Repetition of
messages through
lecture/house
discussion/informa
tion material
• What parent can do ?
• Allowing use at
certain time
encourage control use
• Blocking use during
specific times
decrease online
temptation
• It will leads to
increase involvement
in offline activities and
communication with
parent
How to avoid texting neck?• Maintian correct posture-
keep neck in line with
trunk
• Hold smartphone at the
eye level-avoid bending
neck forward for a
prolonged period.
• Take a break
• Work ergonomic-if
necessary change to
comfortable posture while
working
• Avoid prolonged static
posture
• Change the hand:avoid
holding large or heavy
devices in one hand
continuously
• Neck exercise
• Massage:gentle
rubbing can give
relief from
stiffness.
• Change
hands_avoid
holding large or
heavy devices in
one hand
continuously
Ways to out smart smartphone• Limit Notification:use you
phone setting to avoid
these/push off notification
on app
• Detox regularly:limit or
schedule your without
phone
• Turn off autoplay:to avoid
binge watching like you
tube,use your phone
setting to off the automatic
play of next serial
• Set a schedule:Set
aside specific time to
check face book or
message/resist the
urge till the next
scheduled time. try
delete if possible
social media from
phone & use from
computer.
• do not use phone as
an alarm”:it will help
in not keeping mobile
with you.34% user,
sleep with mobile and
complaints of
distraction.
Phone company are also working on smartphone
• User can turn off notification,phone will alert for
lone use of phone.
• App limit:you can add limit how much you will
like to use app
• Do not disturb:turn on the feature before going
to bed until next morning.
• Parnetal control:parent will get notification about
children phone use,can limit use of certain app as
wellas control over unwanted material.
• Screen time available In IOS 12)it will help to
mange your screen time
Use yoga to manage the technology use• Joint loosening with breath synchronization-
10mins
• Moving head forward & backward as well as clock
wise and anticlockwise-10 times each
• Blinking of eyes-20 times
• Stretching of hand/legs and moving the wrist.
• legsclockwise and anticlockwise-10 times each
• Nadi shuddhi pranayama( alternate nostril
breahing-5 times
(Sharma & Bhargava, 2015)
Summary• Clear evidence high incidence of co-existing disorders
• Recent focus on co-existing disorders generated the need for new approaches to engage and treat client’s
• Considering the limitations of mental illnesses i.e. the variety of cognitive neurobiological social deficits -Teaching skills prior to commitment to change considered valuable
• Frames model and Brief motivational methods can elicit client motivation and change in co-existing clients
• Understanding attitudes and empathic approaches of enquiry
• With adequate training, brief intervention can be delivered in both the addiction & mental health care settings
Aalto M.; Pekuri P., Seppä, K. (2001).Primary health care nurses' and physicians' attitudes, knowledge and beliefs regarding brief intervention for heavy drinkers; Addiction, Vol 96, N0. 2, Feb. 2001 , pp. 305-311(7): Carfax Publishing.
Adamson S. J, Todd, F.C., Sellman, J.D, Huriwai, T, Porter, J. (2006). Co-existing psychiatric disorders in a New Zealand Outpatient Alcohol and other drug clinical population Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry; 40:164-170.
Lock, C. A. Kaner, Lamont, E., Bond, S. A qualitative study of nurses' attitudes and practices regarding brief alcohol intervention in primary health care Research Associate, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Wells, E., Baxter, J., & Schaaf, D. (2006, November). Substance use disorders in Te Rau Hinengaro:the New Zealand mental health survey : final report. Prepared for ALAC. Auckland: Auckland Uni-services Ltd.
Vellman, Richard & Baker 2008 Moving away from medicalised & partisan terminology: a contribution to the debate, Mental Health and Substance Use: Dual Diagnosis, 1:1 2-9
Sobell, L.C. Toneatto, T. & Sobell, M.B. (1994). Behavioural assessment and treatment planning for alcohol, tobacco, and other drug problems: Current status with an emphasis on clinical applications. Behaviour Therapy, 25, 33-0.
Miller, W.R. & Rollnick, ,S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd Ed.)
New York: Guilford Press.Saunders, B., & Herrington, J. (1995). Exploring options: Motivational counselling and addiction behaviour. Perth: William Montgomery, Pty., Ltd.
Sciacca, K. 1997. Removing barriers: dual diagnosis and motivational interviewing.
Professional Counsellor 12(1): 41-6.
Resources & Bibliography