the ewing public schools public presentation of the spring ......public schools spring 2019 thwas...

82
THE EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS The Ewing Public Schools Public Presentation of the Spring 2019 NJSLA Results Presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent September 23, 2019

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

The Ewing Public Schools

Public Presentation of the

Spring 2019 NJSLA Results

Presented by

Dr. Danita Ishibashi

Assistant Superintendent

September 23, 2019

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Public Presentation of the Formal

Report on ESSA

September 23, 2019

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

The ESSA categorizes schools as:

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI)

Non-Categorized

Accountability Metric

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS What Is Our Status?

All Ewing Public

Schools Are

Non-Categorized

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Spring 2019 was the first (1th) administration of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA) New Spring 2019 Science assessment in Grades 4, 8 and 11 the New Jersey Science Learning Assessment (NJSLA) replacing the New Jersey Biology Competency Test (NJBCT) in Grades 9-12

NJSLA Assessment

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

New Jersey Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA)

Administered to:

all grade 3-8 students in ELA and Math

All students enrolled in Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, English 9, English 10

and English 11

What Is NJSLA?

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Antheil 3

Lore 4

Parkway 5

Fisher Middle 79

Ewing High 21

Total 112

Decreased since 2015

Spring 2015 191

Spring 2018 117

Increase Fisher Middle

Spring 2018 40

Spring 2019 79

Ewing 2019 ‘Refusal to Test’

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Single administration

spring -Grades 3-8

end of each semester Grades

9-11 (Fall and Spring) Technology-based

Math by Grade Level (3-8) and

End of Course: Algebra 1,

Geometry, Algebra II

ELA by Grade Level 3-8 and End

of Course (English 9, 10 and 11)

Based on NJSLS

First administration

Science Grades 5, 8

and 11 computer

based administration

aligned to NGSS

(NJSLA-S)

Shorter testing time

(grade level and

content specific, 15-

30 minutes)

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

1. Meet the minimum requirement of courses in ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies, Financial Literacy, Performing/Practical Arts, Physical Education and World Language

AND

2. Demonstrate competency in ELA and Math on a

State assessment (or alternative assessment)

How Does NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

PARCC/NJSLA is one of multiple assessments which can be used to demonstrate competency and meet the graduation requirement in ELA and Math for the class of 2020 - 22 (current Grade 10-12 students)

How Does NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Recently, (June 2019), the Department of Education has clarified the specific pathways to meet the State assessment requirements for the class of 2020, 2021 and 2022 and committed to provide fair notice to students and educators for the class of 2023 and beyond.

How Does NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Class of:

2020 – current 12th grade

2021 – current 11th grade

2022 – current 10th grade

Can meet graduation assessment requirements through any of these three pathways:

1. Achieving passing scores on high-level PARCC assessments;

2. Achieving certain scores on alternative assessments such as the SAT, ACT, or Accuplacer; or

3. The submission by the district of a student portfolio through the Department’s portfolio appeals process.

How Does NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

Graduation Requirements: Classes 2020 – 2022

PARCC • PARCC EOC Algebra I and ELA 10

Substitute Assessments

• Any of the following: SAT, ACT/ACT PLAN, Accuplacer, ASVAB-AFQT, PSAT, ACT Aspire

• Another EOC PARCC assessment (ELA 9, ELA 11, Geometry, or Algebra II)

Portfolio Appeal

• Submitted by the district on behalf of the student.

Students in these classes have limited opportunities to participate in PARCC assessments and some may have already taken subjects tested by PARCC. As such, to meet graduation requirements, students are able to meet various scores on PARCC assessments , substitute assessments or via the portfolio appeal process.

PARCC • PARCC EOC Algebra I and ELA 10

Substitute Assessments

• Any of the following: SAT, ACT/ACT PLAN, Accuplacer, ASVAB-AFQT, PSAT, ACT Aspire

• Another EOC PARCC assessment (ELA 9, ELA 11, Geometry, or Algebra II)

Portfolio Appeal

• Submitted by the district on behalf of the student.

PARCC • PARCC EOC Algebra I and ELA 10

Substitute Assessments

• Any of the following: SAT, ACT/ACT PLAN, Accuplacer, ASVAB-AFQT, PSAT, ACT Aspire

• Another EOC PARCC assessment (ELA 9, ELA 11, Geometry, or Algebra II)

Portfolio Appeal

• Submitted by the district on behalf of the student.

NJSLA • NJSLA EOC Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II and ELA 9, ELA 10, ELA 11

Substitute Assessments

• Any of the following: SAT, ACT/ACT PLAN, Accuplacer, ASVAB-AFQT, PSAT, ACT Aspire

Portfolio Appeal

• Submitted by the district on behalf of the student.

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

PARCC SAT (Prior to March 2016)

ACT Accuplacer PSAT (Prior to October

2016)

ACT Aspire

ASVAB-AFQT

NJ DOE Portfolio Appeal

ELA Grade 9 >= 750 (Level 4) or Grade 10 >= 750 (Level 4) or Grade 11 >= 725 (Level 3)

400 Critical Reading

16 6 Write Placer

4

Write Placer ESL

40 Critical Reading PSAT10

Reading or PSAT/NMS

QT Reading**

* >=22

422 31 Composite

Meet criteria

How Does PARCC/NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

** SAT - new scoring criterion after March 2016

*** PSAT taken October 2016

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

PARCC SAT (Prior to March 2016)

ACT Accuplacer PSAT (Prior to October

2016)

ACT Aspire

ASVAB-AFQT

NJ DOE Portfolio Appeal

Math Algebra I >= 750 (Level 4) or Geometry >= 725 (Level 4) or Algebra II >= 725 (Level 3)

400 Critical Reading

16 76 Elementary

Algebra

40 Critical Reading PSAT10 Math or PSAT/NMSQT Math ***

>=22

422 31 Meet criteria

How Does PARCC/NJSLA Impact High

School Graduation Requirements?

** SAT - new scoring criterion after March 2016

*** PSAT taken October 2016

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Overview of the PARCC Data

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Meet/Exceed the District percentage of students at a Level 4+5

2019 Math Performance

Building Grade District Score School Score

Parkway 3 53 53

Parkway 4 38 46

Lore 3 53 61

Lore 4 38 41

Lore 5 38 43

Anthiel 5 38 42

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Grade levels which exceed the DISTRICT

percentage of students at a Level 4+5

2019 ELA Performance

Building Grade District Score School Score

Lore 3 38 54

Lore 5 45 51

Antheil 4 45 47

Antheil 5 45 48

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Grade levels which meet/exceed the STATE

percentage of students at a Level 4+5

2019 Math Performance

Building Grade STATE Score School Score

Lore 3 51 61

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Grade levels which meet/exceed the STATE

percentage of students at a Level 4+5

2019 ELA Performance

Building Grade STATE Score School Score

Lore 3 50 54

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

2019 ELA Total Population

Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018

Level 4+5 2019

Difference

3 39 38 -1

4 41 45 +4

5 45 45 -

6 45 37 -8

7 52 41 -11

8 43 49 +6

9 42 38 -4

10 31 37 +6

11 25 38 +13

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELA Total Population

Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018 Level 4+5 2019 Difference

3 39 38 -1

4 41 45 +4

5 45 45 -

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELA Total Population

Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018 Level 4+5 2019 Difference

6 45 37 -8

7 52 41 -11

8 43 49 +6

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELA Total Population

Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018 Level 4+5 2019 Difference

9 42 38 -4

10 31 37 +6

11 25 38 +13

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Math Total Population

Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018 Level 4+5 2019 Difference

3 48 53 +7

4 40 38 -2

5 41 38 -3

6 33 25 -8

7 41 38 -3

8 24 25 +1

Algebra I 35 21 -14

Geometry 16 13 -3

Algebra II 12 30 +18

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS District Math Total

Population Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5

2018 Level 4+5

2019 Difference

3 46 53 +7

4 40 38 -2

5 41 38 -3

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS District Math Total

Population Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5

2018 Level 4+5

2019 Difference

6 33 25 -8

7 41 38 -3

8 24 25 +1

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS District Math Total

Population Comparison %

Grade Level Level 4+5 2018 Level 4+5 2019 Difference

Algebra I 35 21 -14

Geometry 16 13 -3

Algebra II 12 30 +18

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

ELA Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

3-4 39 45 +6

4-5 41 45 +4

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

ELA Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

5-6 45 37 -8

6-7 45 41 -4

7-8 52 49 -3

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

ELA Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

8-9 43 38 -5

9-10 42 37 -5

10-11 31 38 +7

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

Math Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

3-4 46 38 -8

4-5 40 38 -2

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

Math Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

5-6 41 25 -16

6-7 33 38 +5

7-8 41 25 -16

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS “Apples to Apples” PARCC

Math Comparison %

Grade 2018 2019 Difference

Algebra I 35 21 -14

Geometry 16 13 -3

Algebra II 12 30 +18

Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

ELA Grade Emerging Approaching

Target At Target Advanced

At Target or Advanced

3 22% 22% 56% 0% 56%

4 0% 50% 50% 0% 50%

5 0% 50% 50% 0% 50%

6 29% 14% 14% 43% 57%

7 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%

8 0% 50% 25% 25% 50%

11 0% 0% 75% 25% 100%

2018-2019 Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)

Math Grade

Emerging Approaching

Target At Target Advanced

At Target or Advanced

3 25% 38% 0% 38% 38%

4 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%

5 50% 0% 25% 25% 50%

6 29% 14% 14% 43% 57%

7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%

8 25% 25% 25% 25% 50%

11 13% 75% 13% 0% 13%

2018-2019 ACCESS data

Grade Overall Score -

K

Overall Score -

1

Overall Score -

2

Overall Score -

3

Overall Score -

4

Overall Score -

5

Overall Score -

6

Overall Score -

7

Overall Score -

8

Overall Score -

9

Overall Score -

10

Overall Score -

11

Overall Score -

12

Entering 38% 0% 6% 3% 0% 38% 0% 0% 0% 33% 10% 50% 0%

Emerging 31% 29% 25% 13% 0% 13% 0% 14% 29% 17% 30% 17% 50%

Developing 23% 47% 44% 47% 30% 38% 67% 43% 43% 50% 50% 33% 50%

Expanding 8% 18% 25% 30% 70% 13% 33% 43% 29% 0% 10% 0% 0%

Bridging 0% 6% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Reaching 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

39

Spring 2017-2019 NJSLA Performance by Subgroup

K-5 ELA

40

39

44

83

27

48 49

42 39

67

33

49

13

38

27

50

35

47 50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by race

Performance by Subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 3

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

41

39 37

69

34

50

38

42

49

80

31

52

46 45

39

60

36

63

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by race

Performance by Subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 4

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

42

51

43

73

46

63

50

45

40

75

38

53

44 45 46

75

39

54

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by Subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 5

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

43

Spring 2017 - 2019 NJSLA

Performance by Subgroup

K-5 Math

44

50

44

100

33

67

63

48

43

58

38

68

25

53

46

94

41

68

88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) Math - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 3

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

45

34 33

59

26

41

31

40 43

80

24

60

50

38

28

50

29

60

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

Performance by Subgroups (race) Math - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 -Grade 4

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

46

33

37

33

22

46

42 41

46

63

28

51 53

38 39

88

24

60

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) Math – NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 5

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

47

Spring 2017 - 2019 NJSLA

Performance by Subgroup

Middle School ELA

48

31

18 20

26

48

25

45

20

64

43

62

30

37

45

62

26

46

36

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Ecp

ect

atio

ns

Subgrop Perfromance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 6

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

49

39

28

56

33

60

29

53

47

86

48

62

33

41

36

73

39

45

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by Subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 7

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

50

32

22

46

22

55

0

43

34

63

36

60 60

49

38

75

44

63

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ans

Subgroup Performnce by Race

Performance by Subgroups (race) ELA - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 8

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

51

Spring 2017 - 2019 NJSLA

Performance by Subgroup

Middle School Math

52

32

28

60

20

49

25

33

37

71

19

42

70

25 25

39

19

33

29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performanc by Race

Performance by Subgroups (race) Math - NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 – Grade 6

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

53

33 31

56

16

60

43

24

30

56

32

63

0

38

33

73

24

62

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ee

d E

xpe

ctat

ion

s

Subgroup Performance by race

Performance by Subgroups (race) Math – NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 7

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

54

28 31

33

21

43

33

24 21

75

18

35 33

25

15

50

19

45

50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgrop Performance by race

Performance by Subgroups by (race) Math – NJSLA Spring 2017 - 2019 - Grade 8

% Met Exceed 2017 % Met Exceed 2018 % Met Exceed 2019

2018-2019 NJSLA - ELA

Performance by Subgroup

Grade level - Elementary Schools

56

38

27

50

35

47 50

24

16

44

21

29

0

54

44

33

53

65

50

33

20

75

29

43

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Sub groups by Building

Spring 2019 - Grade 3 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 District % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

57

45

39

60

36

63

50 47

52

63

37

61

20

42

29

100

28

61

100

46

29

0

43

69

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Spring 2019 - Grade 4 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

58

45 48

50

60

47 50

0

51 50

100

40

66

38

34 33

0

29

36

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Spring 2019 - Grade 5 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

2018-2019 NJSLA - Math Performance by Subgroup

Grade level - Elementary Schools

59

60

53

46

94

41

68

88

44

30

89

32

63

0

61

67

100

48

73

100

53

44

100

44

71

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Sub groups by Building

Spring 2019 - Grade 3 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 District % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

61

38

28

50

29

60

25

29 30

38

23

42

0

41

18

100

23

71

100

46

36

100

43

63

0 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Spring 2019 - Grade 4 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

62

38 39

88

24

60

33

43 44

80

33

58

0

43

25

100

20

75

38

25

42

0

19

28

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Spring 2019 - Grade 5 Sub group comparison

% Met Exceed 2019 % Met Exceed 2019 Antheil % Met Exceed 2019 Lore % Met Exceed 2019 Parkway

Spring 2017 - 2019 NJSLA - Math Performance by Subgroup

High School

63

21% 24%

69%

13%

53%

0%

35% 33%

55%

23%

56%

38%

21%

12%

57%

24%

54%

20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) Math - Algebra I

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed SY 2019

10% 10%

36%

4%

14% 12%

9%

22%

6%

21%

27%

13%

100%

8%

48%

2%

12%

22%

32%

42%

52%

62%

72%

82%

92%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exe

ctat

ion

s

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) Math - Algebra II

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed SY 2019

19%

15%

60%

12%

26%

38%

16%

13%

70%

6%

44%

0%

13%

48%

3% 7%

79%

0% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) Math - Geometry

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed SY 2019

Spring 2017 - 2019 NJSLA - English Performance by Subgroup

High School

67

36%

24%

69%

13%

53%

0%

42%

32%

75%

32%

62%

100%

38%

2% 8%

3% 6% 5% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

aitn

s

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) English - 9

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed SY 2019

43%

10%

36%

4%

14%

0

31%

24%

64%

18%

56%

50%

37%

28%

62%

26%

53%

0% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

atio

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) English - 10

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed Spring 2019

22%

15%

60%

12%

26%

38%

25%

21%

29%

23%

30%

25%

38%

17%

71%

30%

60%

50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

District Hispanic Asian African American White Two or More

% M

et/

Exce

ed

ed

Exp

ect

ato

ns

Subgroup Performance by Race

Performance by subgroups (race) English - 11

% Met Exceed SY 2017 % Met Exceed SY 2018 % Met Exceed Spring 2019

2018-2019 High School Math Performance

Performance Distribution by Student %

Algebra I Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 8% 4% 20% 64% 4% 68%

Spring 2019 13% 47% 26% 15% 0% 15%

SY 2019 12% 42% 25% 21% 0% 21%

Performance Distribution by Student % (4+5)

Geometry Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 2% 22% 33% 41% 2% 43%

Spring 2019 22% 41% 30% 6% 1% 7%

SY 2019 19% 38% 31% 12% 1% 13%

Performance Distribution by Student % (4+5)

Algebra II Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 48% 22% 15% 15% 0% 15%

Spring 2019 29% 17% 19% 33% 1% 34%

SY 2019 37% 19% 17% 26% 1% 27%

2018-2019 High School English Performance

Performance Distribution by Student % (4+5)

English 9 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 8% 5% 33% 41% 14% 54%

Spring 2019 18% 22% 33% 26% 1% 27%

SY 2019 14% 15% 33% 32% 6% 38%

Performance Distribution by Student % (4+5)

English 10 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 9% 26% 23% 32% 11% 43%

Spring 2019 26% 19% 22% 23% 10% 33%

SY 2019 19% 22% 22% 26% 11% 37%

Performance Distribution by Student % (4+5)

English 11 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total 4+5

Fall 2018 13% 20% 24% 30% 14% 44%

Spring 2019 29% 29% 20% 23% 0% 23%

SY 2019 17% 22% 23% 28% 10% 38%

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS

District Overview by Building

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Antheil Elementary School

Areas of Encouragement

Grades (4-5) in ELA

meets/exceeded the

percentage of students

achieving a Level 4/5

Grade 5 in Math

meets/exceeded the

percentage of students

achieving a Level 4/5 at the

district level

Grade 4-5 met/exceeded

expectations in Written

Expression and Conventions

Focus Area

Grades 3 Literacy

(Reading, Information text,

Vocabulary and Writing

expression)

Grade 4- Literacy

(Reading, Information text

and Vocabulary)

Grade 3 Math (Reasoning)

Grade 5 Math

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lore Elementary School

Areas of Encouragement

Grade 3 ELA exceeded the district

and state percentage of students

achieving Level 4/5

Grades 3 Math exceeded the district

and state percentage of students

achieving Level 4/5

Grade 5 ELA exceeded the district

percentage of students achieving

Level 4/5

Grade 5 Math exceeded the district

percentage of students achieving

Level 4/5

Focus Areas

Grade 4 Literacy (Writing)

Grades 4 Math (Modeling and

Reasoning)

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Parkway Elementary School

Area of Encouragement

Grade 3-4 Math exceeded the

district percentage of

students achieving Level 4/5

Focus Areas

Grades 3-4 Literacy

(Information text and

Writing expression)

Grade 5 (Modeling and

application)

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Fisher Middle School

Areas of Encouragement

95% of students enrolled in the

eighth (8th) grade Algebra I

class achieved a 4/5 on the

Algebra I assessment

Grade 7 ELA demonstrated

significant growth in students

achieving Level 4/5

Grade 7 Math demonstrated

growth in students

achieving Level 4/5

Focus Areas

Grades 6 & 8 Math

(Modeling and application)

Grades 6 & 8 Literacy

(Information text and Writing

expression)

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Next Steps: 2019-20

District Focus includes:

Continue professional development focused on the New Jersey

Student Learning Standards (NJSLS) in English Language Arts and

Mathematics

Continue to refine classroom assessments NJSLS in English

Language Arts and Mathematics to reflect both NJSLS and PARCC

Evidence Statements.

Refine common benchmark assessments, data analysis processes

and using data to meet student needs in all content areas

Extend the Grade 6-8 Literacy Coach to grades 4-5

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Next Steps: 2019-20

Building Level Focus includes:

Monitor implementing with fidelity new instructional material in

English 6-8, Math 6-8, Geometry and Algebra II.

Continue to refine common assessments for Algebra I, Geometry

and Algebra II

Monitor implementing with fidelity the writing instructional materials

at the middle school

THE EWING

PUBLIC SCHOOLS Questions?