the european energy climate policy: from …expansion to crisis the future of utilities in the eu...
TRANSCRIPT
THE EUROPEAN ENERGY CLIMATE POLICY: FROM EXPANSION TO CRISIS
The future of utilities in the EU and in the USA, Ifri, Brussels, March 22nd 2016
Michel Matheu, Head of EU Strategy
| 2European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
WHAT MAKES SENSE FOR EUROPE: DE-CARBONISE AT AN AFFORDABLE COST
Winning strategy = competitive de-carbonisation => electrification
| 3
LIKE ANY POLITICAL ENTITY THE EU HAS TO FIND A BALANCE
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
Maintain a Sustainable Development
Ensure Security of Supply
Support Economic Competitiveness
« trilemma » ?
| 4
THE EU’S POLICY: FROM LIBERALISATION TO THE CLIMATE PACKAGE
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
Free circulation of electricity
• “Electricity should, as far as possible, flow between Member States as easily as it currently flows within Member States.”
Least costclimate policy
• “A coherent and co-ordinated framework [...] covering all MSs [...] will allow for significant cost-savings”
« 3 targets » climate policy
• “Development of energy efficiency and RES will enhance energy security, curb theprojected rise in energy prices and reduce [...] emissions”
| 5
EUROPE IS FACING A CRISIS
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
The balance is lost
Source : EEX
Source : Eurelectric
Much of retail price increasedue to RES over-capacity
Does not send anyinvestment signal
| 6
THE MAIN REASON IS CONFLICTING TARGETS: CO2, RES AND EFFICIENCY
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
No investment signal, high carbon technologies at an
advantage
Too low energy and
carbon prices
Recession + oversupply
of mandated RES + EE
It is difficult to break the vicious circle
| 7
IS EUROPE ABLE TO HEAD BACK TO COMPETITIVENESS?
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
Maintain a sustainable
development
Ensure security of supply
Support economic
competitiveness
Liberalisation
ETS
90’s
2000’s
2010’s2030 framework
2008
RES– EE
?
| 8European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
THE MARKET DESIGN THAT MAKES SENSE IN THE LONG RUN IS CLEAR ENOUGH
WELL FUNCTIONING
MARKETS
Clearenergymarketsignal
Predictablecarbonprice
« Smart » capacitymarket
Infra-structure
investmentbased on
CBA
| 9
WE ARE SO FAR FROM THE TARGET THAT A TRANSITION IS NEEDED
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
In order to meet the 2030 targets at best cost, we must develop a full vision of: how to evolve towards a market based framework ...
...which includes fixing the ETS and optimising support to low carbon generation in the next years
WHICH TRANSITION?
Jeopardizedmarkets
Market basedframework
| 10
ETS : EUROPE MUST DO MORE – AND QUICKLY
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
We have lost time. The EU must act to prevent a crash of the ETS
• It took time to achieve a short term fix.
• The MSR will be in operation in a few years.
• An new draft directive is on the table.
BACKLOADING
RESERVE
CAP
NEXT?
• ETS CRISIS
• Lower cap? Adjustments? Price corridor?
| 11European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
THE NEEDED TRANSITION: FROM “SMART” SUPPORT TO MARKETS
Markets are the natural tool for efficient de-carbonisation
“Non market regime” for RES
Control volumes and subsidiesMake markets fit for RES and RES fit for markets
Evolve towards technology neutrality
Base investment on energy and CO2 prices
2020 Transition period Target regime
Restore markets by controlling over-supply
Has to apply to any low carbon technology
| 12
UTILITIES THAT ADAPT WILL BE PART OF THE GAME
European Energy and Climate Policy - March 2016
Content here please
More DSM & EE
More variable generation
More X-border trade
Utilities are currently at (regulatory) risk. But they are essential to the future.
« Smart » things
TSOs DSOs
Generators
Suppliers
Traders
Con- and pro-sumers
BACK-UP
14
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE THREE POLICIES IS PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS
European Energy and
RES and EE targets mandate investments... ...which displace more cost-efficient abatements... ...and mechanically depress the ETS price.
Abatement costs €/t
Cumulated abatements (t/year)
Reduction target
Depressed CO2 pricewith EE & RES policies
Reduced space for efficient ETS market selecting abatements at least cost
CO2 price withstand alone ETS
Mandated EE & RES investments (more costly in terms of €per ton abated)
Overcosts
THANK YOU!