the energy consortium recent developments and the outlook

27
The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook for Natural Gas in the Northeast John R. Bitler October 20, 2010

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

The Energy ConsortiumRecent Developments and the Outlook for

Natural Gas in the Northeast

John R. BitlerOctober 20, 2010

Page 2: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

1

Northeast OverviewTraditional Sources of Supply

• Gulf Coast• Western Canada (WCSB)• Sable Island (Atlantic Canada)• LNG (Everett, MA)• Appalachian (conventional and CBM)

Current Northeast Demand• Average 7.0 Bcf/d

◦ Industrial 0.6 Bcf/d◦ Commercial 1.6 Bcf/d◦ Residential 2.2 Bcf/d◦ Electric Generation 2.5 Bcf/d

Sources: EIA, Northeast Gas Association

Page 3: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

2

Traditional Supply IssuesNortheast at the “end of the pipe”Majority of gas supplies traveling long distances on pipelines from the Gulf Coast or Western Canada

• High transportation costs• Declining production and reserves in maturing

conventional fields◦ WCSB◦ Conventional onshore and offshore fields in the Gulf

Coast experiencing rapid depletion• Deliveries subject to interruptions and pipeline

bottlenecks◦ Hurricanes◦ Peak demand basis blowouts

Atlantic Canada – Sable Island Disappointing

Page 4: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

3

New England Gas Supply Sources

Page 5: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

4

Declining Sable Island Production

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nov

-01

May

-02

Nov

-02

May

-03

Nov

-03

May

-04

Nov

-04

May

-05

Nov

-05

May

-06

Nov

-06

May

-07

Nov

-07

May

-08

Nov

-08

May

-09

Nov

-09

Prod

uctio

n (M

Mcf

/d)

Page 6: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Bcf

/d

WCSB Conventional Production and Reserves

Proved Reserves 56 TcfRemaining Conventional Resources 90 Tcf

Total Recoverable Conventional Resources 146 TcfSource: CAPP

Source: NEB

Page 7: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

6

Gulf Coast Proved Reserves and Production – 2003 v. 2008

12/31/2003 12/31/2008 ChangeOnshore 20.9 18.0 -14%Offshore 23.0 14.0 -39%Total 43.9 32.0 -27%

2003 2008 ChangeOnshore 3.3 2.8 -15%Offshore 4.5 2.4 -47%Total 7.8 5.2 -33%

Proved Reserves (Tcf)

Annual Production (Tcf)

Source: EIA

Page 8: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

7

The Good News U.S. proved reserves increased 29% from 2003 to 2008

• 189.0 Tcf as of 12/31/2003• 244.7 Tcf as of 12/31/2008

More than half of the increase was due to increases in unconventional gas reserves (CBM and shale gas)

• CBM and Shale Gas Proved Reserves were 21.7 Tcfat the end of 2003 and increased to 53.6 Tcf by the end of 2008

• Shale gas reserves increased by more than 900% over this period

• Shale gas increased from about 1% of total U.S. production in 2003 to 20% by 2009

Page 9: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

8

Fundamental Shift in North American Supply/Demand

Source: TransCanada, September 28, 2010 NECA Conference on Natural Gas and Fuel Issues

Page 10: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

9

U.S. Shale Gas Resources

Page 11: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

10

Recent Developments Expand Regional SupplyLiquefied Natural Gas

• From New Brunswick (Canaport) via Maritimes & Northeast pipeline (0.8 Bcf/d)

• From two offshore terminals: Northeast Gateway (0.4 to 0.8 Bcf/d) and Neptune (0.4 Bcf/d)

Rocky Mountain • Rockies Express pipeline: 1.5 Bcf/ into eastern Ohio• Transported to the Northeast via several pipelines

Marcellus Shale• Current production is 0.5 Bcf/d• Expected to grow to 3 Bcf/d by 2015

Page 12: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

11

LNG Supplies for the NortheastExpanded LNG receiving capacity

• Distrigas (Everett) – continued supply to core LDC markets and electric generation (New Mystic)

• Canaport – supplement declining Sable Island production

• Offshore terminals – supplies that will dampen winter peak demand basis blowouts

Excess global LNG capacity through at least 2015• 2009 global LNG trade 8.6 Tcf• U.S. LNG imports 0.45 Tcf• Since 2008 global LNG capacity increased by 3.1 Tcf• Capacity will increase by another 38% through 2013

with the completion of liquefaction trains under construction

Page 13: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

12

Sendout From New England LNG Terminals

Source: FERC Market Oversight Updated October 7, 2010

Page 14: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

13

Expanded Northeast Supplies Bring new conventional wisdom regarding gas prices and availability for end-users

• Old conventional wisdom ◦ Expensive gas ◦ Frequent winter basis blowouts◦ Peak demand delivery restrictions

• New conventional wisdom◦ Moderate prices◦ Less volatility◦ Increased availability

Page 15: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

14

Key QuestionsWhat’s the new conventional wisdom and why the radical shift?

How will the Northeast benefit from more diversified supplies?

Is the Marcellus Shale a game changer with regard to Northeast gas supplies?

How will new supply sources and regional pipeline expansions impact prices and availability?

Page 16: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

15

What’s the new conventional wisdom and why the radical shift?

A dramatic increase in the development and production of gas from unconventional resources, especially shale gas Changes in fracturing and horizontal drilling technology allow for less expensive and more rapid developmentMaturation of conventional producing fields will be more than offset by unconventional gas productionMassive increase in worldwide liquefaction capability, LNG tankers, and U.S. regasification capabilityCritical reliance on LNG no longer required to ensure commodity balance

Page 17: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

16

Is cheap natural gas a transient phenomenon or here to stay?

Natural gas will remain volatile but moderately priced over the long run, i.e., $5.00 - $8.00 into-the-pipe

“Basis” to New England will reflect increased commoditization of gas supplies across North America, in particular, growth of Marcellus shale

Basis blowouts due to periodic deliverability constraints will be less frequent and short-lived

Page 18: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

17

NYMEX Henry Hub Futures

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Nov

-10

Nov

-11

Nov

-12

Nov

-13

Nov

-14

Nov

-15

Nov

-16

Nov

-17

Nov

-18

Nov

-19

Nov

-20

Nov

-21

Nov

-22

$ / M

MB

tu

10/14/2008 10/14/2010

Page 19: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

18

World LNG Estimated October 2010 Landed Prices

Source: FERC Market Oversight Updated October 7, 2010

Page 20: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

19

Natural Gas Daily Spot Price

0

5

10

15

20

25Ja

n-07

Apr-

07

Jul-0

7

Oct

-07

Jan-

08

Apr-

08

Jul-0

8

Oct

-08

Jan-

09

Apr-

09

Jul-0

9

Oct

-09

Jan-

10

Apr-

10

$/M

MB

tu

Henry Hub Algonquin CG

Page 21: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

20

Is Marcellus Shale a game changer, one that will indefinitely flood the market in the greater Northeast?

Proximity to market center, sense of momentum, horizontal multi-frac technology a definite game changerIncreased gas-on-gas competition will hold prices downWill contribute to a redistribution of gas flows on the pipeline infrastructure serving the Northeast

Disparate views re production forecasts, ramp-up

Page 22: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

21

Location of Marcellus Shale

Source: Spectra Energy Northeast Project Update.Sean Maher. NECA Fuels Conference. 9/22/2009.

Page 23: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

22

Marcellus Shale Resources

1 Potential Gas Committee, June 18, 20092 U.S. Energy Information Administration3 Marcellus Proved Reserves < 1 Tcf

500

256220

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Tcf

Che

sape

ake

Ener

gy

Pote

ntia

l Gas

Com

mitt

ee

Ran

ge R

esou

rces

Marcellus ResourceU.S. Resources1

2,060 Tcf

U.S. Proved Reserves2

244 Tcf

Marcellus Shale Resource3

256 Tcf

Annual U.S. Consumption

23 Tcf

Page 24: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

23

Marcellus Shale Production Forecasts

Sources: “An Emerging Giant: Prospects and Economic Impacts of Developing the Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Play.” T. Considine, R. Watson, R. Entler, J. Sparks, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Earth & Mineral Sciences, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering. July 24, 2009.

Integrated Resource Plan for Connecticut. The Brattle Group. January 1, 2010. (Wood Mackenzie)

0.5

2.1

4.5

0.5

2.9

3.9

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

2010 2015 2020

Bcf

/dWood Mackenzie

Penn State

Page 25: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

24

What will be the benefit from diversified supplies?

Greater intra-regional delivery flexibility than ever before

• New sources of supply at new delivery points will improve gas flows and benefit end-users

Decline of Sable Island offset by Canaport LNG via M&N

LNG into Algonquin / M&N injecting diversity benefits across system especially for serving peak demands

Tennessee well-positioned for increased market share with improved flows from M&N and from the Marcellus fields

Page 26: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

25

Natural Gas Infrastructure Additions

Source: Northeast Gas Association

Page 27: The Energy Consortium Recent Developments and the Outlook

26

A Few Clouds for a Sunny OutlookMarcellus Production

• Possible hydraulic fracturing restrictions• High water consumption• Long-term economics look good but it is early in the

life of this gas resource play◦ Short well production history

LNG capacity glut could disappear after 2015• Current low prices delaying new liquefaction facilities• Return to global economic growth will increase the

demand for LNG suppliesUltimately U.S. carbon emissions regulations are likely to result in a significant shift from coal to gas-fired electricity generation