the electoral knowledge network produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and...

46
THE ELECTORAL THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK KNOWLEDGE NETWORK

Upload: rosaline-willis

Post on 16-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE ELECTORAL THE ELECTORAL

KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE

NETWORK NETWORK

Page 2: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

produce and share knowledge

adapt and apply knowledge

acquire and manage knowledge

PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

2 3KNOWLEDGE

BASE

1

T H E E L E C T O R A L K N O W L E D G E N E T W O R KT H E E L E C T O R A L K N O W L E D G E N E T W O R K

Page 3: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

EXTERNAL SCRUTINY

elections were primarily an

internal matter of states

the “knowledge gap”

a wide number of countries undertook steps to reform their electoral systems and processesEVALUATION

DEMOCRATISATION WAVE

NO

Page 4: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the field of electoral

administration has

dramatically grown and

changed in scope

new critical needs emerged:

there was a sharp increase

in demand for electoral

assistance

election practitioners confront more and more complex challenges

accountability

legitimacy

representation

sustainability

transparency

participation

the democratization wave

Page 5: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE KNOWLEDGE GAPTHE KNOWLEDGE GAP

the “knowledge gap”

some countries were largely

unprepared to go through major

democratic transitions that featured crucial

elections

electoral institutions not always possessed the necessary experience and knowledge to deliver and guarantee credible elections

electoral practitioners had

virtually no access to comparative

knowledge, best practices and

lessons learned in the field of

elections

there was no coherent electoral administration methodology, the field lacked of common standards

1990’s

Page 6: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE KNOWLEDGE GAPTHE KNOWLEDGE GAP

the ACE Project

a collaborative effort a collaborative effort

Page 7: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE Project

a complete and systematic collection of information on all aspects relating to the organization of elections

Page 8: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

target audience

policy-makers and legislators

election administrators

members of parliament

political party representatives

electoral practitioners

media representatives

academics

researchers and students

the civil society

multilateral institutions

donor agencies

Page 9: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

key facts and figures

an estimated 8,000 pages of text

partial, unofficial language versions: Arabic, Serbian, Albanian and Russian

collects 700 sample materials from 90 countries

150 case studies from 40

countries

500 election-related links to

external resources

15,000 CD-Roms distributed worldwide

ACE website traffic averages between

700,000 and 1,000,000 hits per

month

three official language versions: English, Spanish and French

Page 10: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the new challenges

new needs and priorities were arising

Page 11: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE KNOWLEDGE GAPTHE KNOWLEDGE GAP

the changing needs

CREDIBILITY GAPCREDIBILITY GAPelectoral management bodies

confront a whole set of new challenges:

building the trust of the various stakeholders in the electoral process

political parties

electorate

the civil society

the media

observer groups

international community

Page 12: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE KNOWLEDGE GAPTHE KNOWLEDGE GAP

the changing needs

CREDIBILITY GAPCREDIBILITY GAPelectoral management bodies

confront a whole set of new challenges:

building the trust of the various stakeholders in the electoral process

creating transparent and

sustainable electoral systems

and processes

addressing problems of lack of retention of their institutional memory

??

reversing situations of

professional stagnation

PROFESSIONAL

PROFESSIONAL

STAGNATION

STAGNATION

solving political, financial and logistical challenges undermining their work and the credibility of the elections

Page 13: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

enhanced credibility

strengthened public trust

loss of credibility and mistrust in the electoral process

THE KNOWLEDGE GAPTHE KNOWLEDGE GAP

the changing needs

CREDIBILITY GAPCREDIBILITY GAP

voters’ apathy and low turnout

a more professional

electoral administration

an elected government that lacks of the required legitimacy

electoral disputes, electoral violence or civil strife

Page 14: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

credible elections require stakeholders’ confidence:

in the way in which that process is being administrated

in the institution administering that processstakeholders’ confidence mattersstakeholders’ confidence matters

in the electoral process

Page 15: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

solving the credibility gap

once that public trust in the

electoral process is lost,

regaining it could be extremely

difficult

run elections well

a “professional” approach

1 2TWOFOLDSOLUTION:

be perceived as running elections

well

Page 16: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

solving the credibility gap

a “profession” differs from a “job”

is always guided by an ethical code

of conduct

has access to reference materials and publications on relevant subject matters

takes part in professional development programmes,

training courses,

secondments

is part of a network of peers who could serve as a resource for obtaining support and inspiration

a “professional” approach

Page 17: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE partners sought to evaluate the relevance of the ACE Project to address these changing needs

expanding the ACE partnership

the ACE Project could no longer

provide all the appropriate

responses to address the new

challenges

transform the ACE Project into a more

active and interactive force,

with new services and dimensions

full project partnerscooperating partners

Page 18: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

T H E E L E C T O R A L K N O W L E D G E N E T W O R KT H E E L E C T O R A L K N O W L E D G E N E T W O R K

PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

2 3KNOWLEDGE

BASE

1

Page 19: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

knowledge

Practitioners’ Network

knowledge

dissemination

retention

codification

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

existing online databases, tools, publications and

libraries

new databases, publications, tools

and services

acquisition

centralized centralized repository for repository for

electoral knowledgeelectoral knowledge

produce and share

knowledge

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 20: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

the supporting structure, the backbone of the ACE Practitioners’ Network

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 21: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

an enhanced and updated version of the ACE core texts, with special emphasis on issues of costs, sustainability, professionalism and trust

new dynamic functions, a greater interaction between the core texts and related links, services and resources

the “Focus On…”

the “Electoral Quiz”

the “Electoral Glossary”

the ACE topic areas

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 22: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

new comparative functions allowing users to compare how different countries manage their elections:

country [A]

country [B]

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

comparative comparative datadata

electoral systemvoter

educationvote

counting

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 23: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

a comprehensive and structured collection of electoral resources, case studies and sample materials from all over the world:

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

electoral electoral resourcesresources

comparative comparative datadata

electoral legislation

electoral observation reports

technical assessments

sample materials

voter education materials

election calendars

codes of conduct

etc.

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 24: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

provision of professional electoral advisory services online

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

electoral electoral adviceadvice

electoral electoral resourcesresources

comparative comparative datadata

archive of questions and answers

electoral “forum”

roster of experts

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Get online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

Electoral Advice Online

submit question

Page 25: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

““Elections Elections Today”Today”

electoral electoral adviceadvice

electoral electoral resourcesresources

comparative comparative datadata

… and more

news from the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network:

election calendars

election-related articles from ACE partner organisation, of practitioners from the community of practice, institutions taking part to the project as resource centres

regional highlights

events

job opportunities

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

Page 26: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE the ACE encyclopaediaencyclopaedia

regionsregions

““Elections Elections Today”Today”

electoral electoral adviceadvice

electoral electoral resourcesresources

comparative comparative datadata

…and more

ACQUIRE AND MANAGE KNOWLEDGE

THE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASETHE ACE KNOWLEDGE BASE

the regional dimension of the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network:

map of the resource centres in the various regions

links to regional case studies

online forum for regional partners to communicate and exchange info

regional news and events

Page 27: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRES

GENERATE AND SHARE KNOWLEDGE

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKTHE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

a group of electoral practitioners sharing common interests, common professional responsibilities and common goals

THEMATIC

REGIONAL RESOURCE REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRESCENTRES

REGIONAL

a network of Electoral Resource Centres, strategically established in different regions worldwide to collect, share and make knowledge accessible in the form of comparative data, resource materials, case studies and events

West Africa

Southern Africa

Middle East

Oceania

Asia

North America

Central America

South America

Europe

North Africa

Page 28: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRES

electoral systems

legal framework

ELECTORAL ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF COMMUNITY OF

PRACTICEPRACTICE

electoral management

boundary delimitation

voter education

voter registration

parties and candidates

voting operations

vote counting

media and elections

election integrity

elections and

technology

GENERATE AND SHARE KNOWLEDGE

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKTHE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

Page 29: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRES

GENERATE AND SHARE KNOWLEDGE

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKTHE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKVoter Registration

HIGHLY COMPUTERISED VOTER REGISTRATION???

Page 30: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRES

GENERATE AND SHARE KNOWLEDGE

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKTHE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

Voter Registration

Page 31: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

ELECTORAL COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRES

exchange of information and know-howproduction of case studiesmutual support and provision of advisory services

collection of comparative data and resource materials

creation of opportunities for activities and events

GENERATE AND SHARE KNOWLEDGE

THE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORKTHE PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK

Page 32: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

training, professional advisory services,

and peer partnerships

long-term capacity development projects to assist electoral management bodies requiring support to reach higher levels of professionalisation

ADAPT AND APPLY KNOWLEDGE

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENTCAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FACILITY (CDF)

capacity development tools and formal educational programmes on electoral administration based on the ACE texts, leading to the awarding of formal certificates/diplomas by academic institutions

targeted assistance activities for electoral management bodies requiring assistance in strengthening their policy and legislation frameworks

regional training programmes for electoral instructions wishing to strengthen the professional capacity of their staff

Page 33: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Get online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

Electoral Advice Online

Questions & AnswersBrowse the archive of previous Questions and Answers

The Electoral Forum

The “meeting place” for the members of the ACE Practitioners’ Network

browse archive

submit question

join the forum

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

The Practitioners’ Network of the Administration and Cost of Elections (ACE) Project offers integrated knowledge services designed to meet a growing demand for sharing information and best practices on elections and for timely, coherent and effective technical and policy advice within the global electoral community.

The Practitioners’ Network serves as a vehicle for:

the building of common standards, language, methods and models around specific technical, legal, procedural issues relating to elections;

the delivery of professional advisory services both among the same Network’s members and to the ACE community at large;

the establishment of a “network of peers” who are in constant contact and interaction, rely on each other, solve problems, offer solutions, share knowledge and provide timely support;

the creation of opportunities for professional development events on a global or a regional level.

Welcome to the Practitioners’ Network

The Practitioners’ Network

Page 34: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Electoral Advice Online

submit question

Submit a Question:

Subject:

Name:

E-mail:

Please do not publish my name or e-mail address.

Type your question here

Through Ask the Experts, users pose questions on election administration, electoral systems and processes to the ACE Practitioners’ Network, a pool of election professionals with diverse and complementary

experience and specialisation.

Surname:

Select a subject

Submitting Question....

I would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of establishing a voters’ register containing the photographs of registered voters, in addition to issuing them with a photo voter ID…

John

Brown

[email protected]

Voter Registration

Get online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

How does Electoral Advice Online Work?

Page 35: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE ProjectThe Electoral Knowledge Network

?

with these machines there is no possibility of an invalid or blank vote as a choice for the voter

we would urgently like to know your opinion on whether we should include in the machines a blank vote option

is a blank vote a voter’s right? do protest votes play an important function?

how have other countries having electronic voting systems dealt with such an issue?

next week our Election Commission will participate to Parliamentary Hearing to decide on the introduction of electronic voting machines based on the Indian model

Page 36: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

the ACE ProjectThe Electoral Knowledge Network

the practitioners’ network

Media and Elections

Electoral Systems

Elections and Technology

Legal Framework

Elections Integrity

Voter Registration

Boundary Delimitation

Voter Education

Electoral Management

Voting Operations

Vote Counting

Parties and Candidates

NO YESGet online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

Get online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

Electoral Advice Online

…validation process…

?

Page 37: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

?

the ACE ProjectThe Electoral Knowledge Network

the practitioners’ network

Media and Elections

Electoral Systems

Elections and Technology

Legal Framework

Elections Integrity

Voter Registration

Boundary Delimitation

Voter Education

Electoral Management

Voting Operations

Vote Counting

Parties and Candidates

Get online technical and policy advice on electoral matters

Electoral Advice Online

…indexing process…

Switzerland has options for blank votes with e-voting, since blank votes are taken into account when it comes to voter turnout. I think the answer is quite simple - wherever a blank vote is a possibility in a country, then it has to be offered with e-voting as well. Vice versa - e-voting should not offer a possibility (i.e. blank vote) that the traditional way of casting a ballot does not offer. All voters should be treated equally. Best, Nadja

I fully agree with Nadia's comment. I just would like to add a specific comment.  Almost all the machines I know about allow a blank vote (or undervote, as it is the name in the US jargon).  Most of them will inform the voter that s/he is issuing a blank/under vote and ask s/he to ratify the decision to avoid blank votes being issued by mistake.When voting with paper ballots, the inclusion of a box "None of the above" allows differentiating between blank ballots cast by ignorance or mistake from "purposeful" blank ballots, in the sense that the person does not want to vote for any of the available candidates.  It is because there is that difference that the inclusion of a specific box "None of the above" makes sense in paper based systems.In the world of machines, if the machine requires a ratification in the case of a blank/under vote, this is the equivalent of including an specific box.  The voter has opted by a blank vote after being informed that s/he might be incurring in error.  I think that the addition of a specific "none of the above" makes sense in the world of machines only if the machine does not inform the voter in case of blank/under votes.

To add a few quick comments to the mix. If machines are to be configured in this way, it would be necessary to specify in the law what will be the consequences if (a) "None of the Above" (NOTA) wins an absolute majority (eg NOTA 60%, Party A 25%, Party B 15%); or (b) NOTA wins a plurality but less than 50% (eg NOTA 40%, Party A 35%, Party B 25%). (It has the potential to get messier in preferential and proportional systems (for example, if there are 10 vacancies and NOTA wins a quota, should the number of vacancies to be filled by live candidates drop to 9?).In more democratic systems its effects would be more problematical. My view is that the system should encourage (though not necessarily compel) people to exercise their power to choose. There will always be some people who are genuinely indifferent between the candidates (and they will normally have the option of abstaining), or who feel strongly about lodging a protest vote; but I think that offering NOTA as an explicit option might encourage some people to make a rather glib statement, when they are not really indifferent between the remaining candidates. Michael

Let me add a couple of comments to Horatio, and Michael's and others' input. I just returned from observing the US election. In Florida, the ballot not only involved elections for President, Senate and Congress, but also for multiple local offices and for local initiatives. In this kind of situation where would one draw the line on "none of the above" and what would be the criteria for inclusion or exclusion of this option??? Personally I favour the inclusion of the option but choosing it would result in a rejected ballot in order to avoid the complications described. The rejected ballots would then be subdivided into none of the above ballots, and ballots rejected for other reasons.Ron

Though the Indian Electronic Voting machines (EVMs) can be programmed to record “NOTA” option, the reason it is not so recorded lies in the experience of the past. In the FPTP system of India, contest at the provincial level could be quite close. Many times the difference between the winning candidate and the trailing candidate is less then the total invalid votes. In the Indian type of EVM at present there is no scope for an invalid or void vote. But if “NOTA” option were to be introduced, then a large number of those Indian voters who are illiterate, might mistaken it for some candidate and thus cast vote which will essentially be an invalid vote. Moreover, in the absence of a legal provision, a voter can not exercise the NOTA option. Thus in countries where there is no option available at present to exercise this option, there it may not be advisable to introduce this option. Similarly where this option already exists then configuring machines to record NOTA should present no problem. By the way, in India, instead of NOTA option, to show their dissatisfaction and angst with politicians, sometimes all the voters from certain village decide to boycott the elections: a collective exercise of NOTA option!!!

Elections and Technology

Use of electronic voting machines

5 Answers Available

ACE community of users

Page 38: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Questions & Answers

Browse the Q&As Archive:

Select a subject:

The archive is organized to facilitate the search and retrieval of pertinent information.

Questions & Answers can be retrieved through the following search criteria:

By Subject:

By Expert:

By Date:

By Language:

By Free Text:

Select an expert:

Select a date:

Select a language:

Type a keyword here:

Electoral Operations

Our commission is debating possible measures to make voting operations faster and more efficient to

voters. We would like to know if, in your experience, there is a maximum allowable – or suggested - voter

capacity of a polling station.View Answers

I would like to know at what places, generally, voting outside the country is permitted?

View Answers

What is, on average, the number of electoral officials who are assigned to a polling station?

View Answers

Recent questions about...

Question of the WeekBoundary delimitation

search

Electoral Standards

Electoral Systems

Legislative Framework

Electoral Management

Boundary Delimitation

Electoral Observation

Voter Education

Voter Registration

Voting Operations

Parties and Candidates

Media and Elections

Electoral Training

Elections & Technology

Gender in Elections

Voter Participation

Archer, Keith

Beramendi Heine, Virgina

Brady, Jeff

Carrico, Jim

Helgason, Kristinn

Maguire, Linda

Navarro, Carlos

Ngidi, Sa

Pearce Laanela, Therese

Rwakins, Phillip

Brown, John

Spinelli, Antonio

Al Fahed, Majid

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

Espaňol

Français

English

Bahasa Indonesia

Arabic

Find the answers for your questions in our repository of knowledgeThe questions posed by users and answers generated by the experts through Electoral Advice Online

contribute to generate a pool of frequently asked questions that, properly organized and indexed, serve as a repository of quality electoral knowledge which is made available to others facing similar issues.

Page 39: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Questions & Answers

Questions & Answers by Subject: Questions & Answers by Expert:

Electoral Standards 24

Electoral Systems 20

Legislative Framework 15

Electoral Management 34

Electoral Observation 23

Voter Education 42

23

Voting Operations 12

Parties and Candidates 25

Vote Counting 47

Media and Elections 34

Electoral Training 12

Elections & Technology 29

Gender in Elections 21

Voter Participation 10

Expert: Joined: Answers:

005 Archer, Keith 2003 4 View Profile

013 Beramendi, Virginia 2004 5 View Profile

001 Brady, Jeff 2003 8 View Profile

014 Carrico, Jim 2002 6 View Profile

002 Helgason, Kristinn 2002 4 View Profile

006 Maguire, Linda 2003 6 View Profile

011 Navarro, Carlos 2003 7 View Profile

008 Ngidi, Sa 2004 7 View Profile

003 Laanela, Therese 2002 5 View Profile

012 2001 9 View Profile

004 Spinelli, Antonio 2004 4 View Profile

012 Al Fahed, Majid 2002 9 View Profile

Voter Registration

Brown, John

The questions posed by users and answers generated by the experts through Electoral Advice Online contribute to generate a pool of frequently asked questions that, properly organized and indexed, serve as

a repository of quality electoral knowledge which is made available to others facing similar issues.

Find the answers for your questions in our repository of knowledge

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Page 40: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Questions & Answers

Q&A’s: Voter Registration (23)

Voter Registration submitted on 14 February 2005

Photographic voters´ lists, pro and cons. I would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of establishing a photo voters´ register in addition to photo voter IDs (which appears very expensive, complex and time

consuming) as against having non-photo voters register with photo ID cards? Could you present a cost-benefit analysis of the two options? I will be grateful if you could provide me as much information as possible with regard to this matter.

4 Answers Available Submit Question Download Print

Voter Registration submitted on 19 January 2005

Soy una profesora de Ciencia Política y de la Administración de la Universidad de Valencia. Estaría interesada en los "materiales de muestra" que se indican en su página web sobre el proyecto “Administración y Costo de Elecciones”. No

sé por qué cuando intento consultarlo es como si estuviera vacío o no se pudiera acceder a él. Lo he probado varios días sin éxito. Por un trabajo que estoy elaborando, me interesaría tener una muestra de papeletas de votación de distintos

países (en especial, de aquellos que tienen sistemas electorales mixtos). ¿Podrían ayudarme y mandarme información al respecto?

3 Answers Available Submit Question Download Print

2 of 23 NEXT PAGE ►back

The questions posed by users and answers generated by the experts through Electoral Advice Online contribute to generate a pool of frequently asked questions that, properly organized and indexed, serve as

a repository of quality electoral knowledge which is made available to others facing similar issues.

Find the answers for your questions in our repository of knowledge

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Page 41: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Questions & Answers

Questions & Answers by Subject: Questions & Answers by Expert

Electoral Standards 24

Electoral Systems 20

Legislative Framework 15

Electoral Management 34

Electoral Observation 23

Voter Education 42

23

Voting Operations 12

Parties and Candidates 25

Vote Counting 47

Media and Elections 34

Electoral Training 12

Elections & Technology 29

Gender in Elections 21

Voter Participation 10

Expert: Joined: Answers:

Voter Registration

005 Archer, Keith 2003 4 View Profile

013 Beramendi, Virginia 2004 5 View Profile

001 Brady, Jeff 2003 8 View Profile

014 Carrico, Jim 2002 6 View Profile

002 Helgason, Kristinn 2002 4 View Profile

006 Maguire, Linda 2003 6 View Profile

011 Navarro, Carlos 2003 7 View Profile

008 Ngidi, Sa 2004 7 View Profile

003 Laanela, Therese 2002 5 View Profile

012 2001 47 View Profile

004 Spinelli, Antonio 2004 4 View Profile

012 Al Fahed, Majid 2002 9 View Profile

Brown, John

The questions posed by users and answers generated by the experts through Electoral Advice Online contribute to generate a pool of frequently asked questions that, properly organized and indexed, serve as

a repository of quality electoral knowledge which is made available to others facing similar issues.

Find the answers for your questions in our repository of knowledge

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Page 42: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Roster of Experts

Expert’s Profile:

Email: [email protected]

Areas of Expertise: Electoral Systems, Legal Framework,

Electoral Management ... more

Recent Papers: Reforming Georgia's Electoral System,

The Way Ahead

Member of the Practitioners’ Network since: May 2001

John Brown specializes in election processes reform in Central Asia and the Caucasus, as well as in the democratic challenges in the Caspian region more

generally. He has followed the electoral process in Russia and the states of the former Soviet Union for more than 15 years and has traveled extensively in this

region and in South-East Asia.

Dr. Brown currently serves as the Executive Director of the Free and Fair Elections Consortium in Georgia..

Prior to his work at the Caucasus Project, Doe worked as a professor at the Faculty of Political Science at the Oxford University, from 1995 to 1998.

Dr. Brown also served for five years as the Executive Director director of the Trust Fund for Democracy and as a senior international electoral advisor for the Quorum

Foundation to the Central Electoral Commission of Armenia.

Languages: English, Russian, French

Education: M.A., Ph.D., University of Maputo.

Brown, John S. (009) View all Answers by this Expert (47)

Welcome to the Roster of Experts of the Practitioners’ Network:

home about this project project partners contact us links

join the practitioners' network

Find an Expert by Subject:

Find an Expert by Name:

Select a Subject

Select an Expert

Page 43: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

Register Online

1 Step 1: Fill in the registration form

Name:

E-mail:

Surname:

Address: Telephone:

Summary of Professional experience:

Fax:

Languages: Education:

Public Profile:

2 Step 2: Select areas of expertise

Indicate the areas of expertise on which you

offer to provide answers to questions received through

Electoral Advice Online:

Electoral Systems

Electoral Management

Electoral Observation

Voter Education

Voter Registration

Voting Operations

Parties and Candidates

Vote Counting

Media and Elections

Elections & Technology

Gender in Elections

Legislative Framework

Voter Participation

Electoral Forum

3

xx

x

xx

x

x

Step 3: Submit your information

submit

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

John Brown specializes in election processes reform in Central Asia and the Caucasus, as well as in the democratic challenges …

John Brown

43, Gogebashivili10076 TblisiGeorgia

00321-8-765239

00321-8-765240

[email protected]

English, Russian ... PHD in ...

Prior to his work at the Caucasus Project, Brown worked as a professor at the Faculty of Political Science at the Oxford Univ…

Page 44: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

The Electoral Forumlog in | registration | my profile | search | faq | forum home

» your are logged in as antspin Electoral Forum »

bulletin boards posts last post moderator

Voter Registration This discussion room covers a wide range of issues relating to voter registration.

23 The use of photographic lists in voter registration

posted by antspi – 14 June 2004

keiarc

Elections and TechnologyThis discussion room covers the application of technology in election administration.

12 Examples of how the application of technology in elections may have controversial effectsposted by rayken – 11 May 2004

helalv

Electoral SystemsThe place where to discuss everything about electoral systems.

9 What is the most suitable electoral system for Saudi Arabia?

posted by micmal – 13 June 2004

stilar

Voter EducationVoter information programmes are an integral a fundamental part of an electoral process.

2 How voter education could effectively help in raising youth turnout in electionsPosted by fidnas – 3 June 2004

paugra

Electoral ManagementA proper electoral management as the administrative infrastructure supporting efficient and crdible elections.

4 Which mechanisms could be put in place to support an EMB to be truly “independent”?

Posted by sarsta – 3 June 2004

jorruk

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Page 45: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

The Electoral Forumlog in | registration | my profile | search | faq | forum home

» your are logged in as antspin Electoral Forum » Bulletin Board » Electoral Systems

Total number of pages for this topic: 1  2  3  4  5

USER Topic: Electoral Systems

antspinmember 111

Message sent on: 14 June 2004 13:21

Well, by referring to a mixed proportional representation system, I intended to bring into the discussion a possible alternative that, for personal experience, proved to be responsive to an environment similar to the one being examined. Anyway, your opinion is welcome, as it provides a a new and interesting perspective on this very subject.

Messages: 15 | From: Yemen | Registered on: Mar 2004  |  IP: Online

thelaamember 031

Message sent on 11 June 2004 18:45

Frankly, I am convinced that the question posed by andell is not being address from the right angle. In your which is the fact that these type of electoral systems seem to have produced controversial results in terms of political representation when adopted and implemented in transitional situations.

Messages: 65 | From: Sweden | Registered on: Dec 2003  |  IP: Offline

margramember 121

Message sent on 9 june 2004 11:17

My experience with this topic is somehow limited, but I would invite you to cover this subject also from a point of view of representation, including women, the illiterate and disabled voters and minority and other vulnerable segments of the society.

Messages: 45 | From: Australia | Registered on: June 2003  |  IP: Offline

andellmember 001

Message sent on 31 May 09:30

Good point! I would like to add that, when considering transitional elections in post-conflict environments, one has to also give careful consideration the proper sequencing of the various operations and aspects comprisingo the technical and political aspects of the transition process…

Messages: 625 | From: Indonesia | Registered on: Jan 2000  |  IP: Offline

home about this project project partners join the practitioners' network contact us links

Page 46: THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK produce and share knowledge adapt and apply knowledge acquire and manage knowledge PRACTITIONERS’ NETWORK CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

T H A N K Y O UT H A N K Y O U

THE ELECTORAL THE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE

NETWORKNETWORK