the crusader - december 1, 2010 (vol. 1, no. 2)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 The Crusader - December 1, 2010 (Vol. 1, No. 2)
1/5
The Official Newsletter of the Ateneo Christian Union for Socialist and Democratic Advancement (CRUSADA
December 1, 2010 Vol. 1 N
INSIDE
Politics: Budget Transparency 1
Special Section: The Budget Process 3
Economy: Public Private Partnerships 4
Perspective: On the Korean Conflict 4
Theory & Politics: Neoliberalism 5
POLITICS | Not Transparent Enough
The International Budget Partnership (IBP), a
United States based group that monitors
budget transparency in 94 countries, gave the
Philippines a mediocre score of 55% in its
annual Open Budget survey released last week.
This means that the government was not able
to provide sufficient information on the five
out of eight budget related documents, which
are supposedly open for public viewing. Thescore reflects how the government needs to do
more to make the budget more transparent.
Lack of transparency leads to more room for
corruption.
Picture Source: http://pcij.org
Several factors are to blame. One, there is n
enough public involvement in the conception
the budget. The executive and legislative do
involve nor sufficiently inform the public on t
creation of the budget. Even though items
the budget may be openly debated in t
Senate or the House of Representatives , t
final versions are discussed within closed do
in the Bicameral Committee. Secondly, peoare not doing enough to demand for mo
transparency and when they do the governme
is often suspicious or dismissive of th
intentions.
continued on the next page
Editorial Board: Miguel Calayag, Kristine Chy, Zarah
Domingo, Daniel Garingan, Joshua Lim, JA De Lima, Jules
Lo, Coco Navarro, James Roman, Miguel Rivera, Maria
Venturanza
-
8/8/2019 The Crusader - December 1, 2010 (Vol. 1, No. 2)
2/5
Instead of listening, government
officials are defensive, claiming that
the students did not bother to look at
the greater picture of the budget as a
whole.
THE CRUSADER 2
Last week, students of state-owned University of
the Philippines walked out in protest of budget
cuts to the individual budgets of state
universities and colleges (SUCs). Instead of
listening, government officials are defensive,
claiming that the students did not bother to lookat the greater picture of the budget as a whole.
The total budget allocated for all SUCs had in
fact increased for 2011 in comparison to the
allocation for this year despite the fact that
individual allocations decreased, according to
Budget Secretary Florencio Abad. Sources
suggest that the unsustainable SUCs will either
be merged with other SUCs to form university
systems, or will be closed altogether, in order to
save on potential operational costs.
While budget officials appear to be open to
dialogue with sectors involved, the overriding
concern cutting down costs reeks of
neoliberal ideological motivations that willeventually render any dialogue fruitless so long
as the government insists on this pre-
determined position. Transparency is one issue.
Ideological stubbornness is another.
Students and faculty members of the University of th
Philippines protesting proposed education budget cu
Picture Source: abs-cbnnews.c
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS PER SECTO
in 2009 and 2010
-
8/8/2019 The Crusader - December 1, 2010 (Vol. 1, No. 2)
3/5
THE BUDGET PROCESS
Information taken from www.dbm.gov.ph, the official website of The
Department of Budget and Management. Flowchart prepared by The
CRUSADER Editorial Board.
THE CRUSADER 3
-
8/8/2019 The Crusader - December 1, 2010 (Vol. 1, No. 2)
4/5
THE CRUSADER 4
PERSPECTIVE |A Looming War?
A volatile North Korea delivered an aggressive and fa
response to a South Korean artillery exercise last
November 23 that left 4 people, including 2 civilians,
dead in the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong.
Although there had been several deadly military
engagements and provocative rhetoric from the Nort
throughout the years since the end of the Korean Wa
the incident last November 23 still sent shockwaves t
the world market and the global political arena
reminding everyone that one of East Asias most
successful capitalist-democracies has always been at
threshold of a possible nuclear onslaught. These
seemingly spontaneous episodes of violence howeve
are not completely surprising. Instead, these are clea
indicators of the failure of political discourse amongs
major stakeholders in the on-going Korean affair. Thi
includes not only the two Koreas but also the major
world powers such as the United States and the Peop
Republic of China. It also illustrates the destructive
consequences of leaving highly political decisions on
indefinite hold in favor of pursuing economicdevelopment. In the case of the South, five decades
after a mutual agreement on the cessation of hostilit
it has become major regional power. On the other ha
North Korea has been occasionally labeled as a rogue
militaristic state suffering from chronic economic illn
ever since. Unfortunately, the prolonged truce betwe
the North and the South resolved tensions did not
resolve the real dispute between the two, but instea
fostered indifference and violence towards each othe
That same truce that apparently aimed to cease war
only led to individualistic interests instead of Korean
solidarity. Economic prosperity might have landed on
South Korean soil but at the expense of a genuine
democratic experience. It must be realized the Korea
War is not a just a war between a broken people, it is
also a war for democracy.
ECONOMY | What about the public?
President Benigno Noynoy Aquino III reiterated last
week his governments commitment to developing more
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) which seek tostrengthen the countrys economic foundation through a
BOT (build-operate-transfer) approach. This economic
strategy involves private firms investing in the
government by building and developing infrastructure
facilities where ownership will gradually be transferred
to the government, after breaking even and getting
profit of course. This is a gamble however. In most PPPs,
the government assumes its share of market risk having
to play around with big money and if threats do realize
into financial problems, such as facilities not earning
profits (which is the case now with the EDSA MRT line),
taxpayers will unwittingly shoulder the heavy burden
even when they are out of services reach.
This trend is not new. In fact, most of the natural
monopolies such as water systems, oil,
telecommunications and transportation are due to PPP
deals contracted during the presidency of Fidel Ramos.
Experience with these partnerships should already make
the government cautious front in dealing with such
negotiations. During Ramoss time, PPPs involving theIndependent Power Producers (IPPs) turned out to be a
long-term burden since they forced the government to
pay for excess or unused power and shoulder most
operational problems. These continue to bear on
present economic woes vis--vis dollar denominated
debts and payments.
These lopsided arrangements such as take or pay
provisions are not entirely the private sectors fault.
Investing in the Philippines continues to be a risky affair.PPP investors are in the risk of encountering irregularities
such as corruption and dishonoring of contract (as in the
failure of NAIA 3 to run as an international airport).
Instead of simply promising PPP schemes profits for the
private companies involved, the government must assure
them of transparency mechanisms and a trustworthy
regulatory framework. Better infrastructures will also
help. But with a government that seems to be weary of
public spending, attracting PPPs will entail giving in to
the demands of private sector partners.
-
8/8/2019 The Crusader - December 1, 2010 (Vol. 1, No. 2)
5/5
What is NEOLIBERALISM and why is it ANTI-DEMOCRATIC?
Global neoliberalism transforms aspects of social life into economic and
market relations which is evident in the entrepreneurial turn in politics
today. According to this ideal of contemporary politics, the model citizen is
one who strategizes for her/ himself among various social, political and
economic options, not one who strives with others to alter or reorganize
these options. The political theorist Wendy Brown enumerates very
interesting examples: 1) the market rationality permeating universities
today, from admissions and recruiting to the relentless consumer mentality
of students in relationship to university brand names, courses, and
services, from faculty raiding and pay scales to promotion criteria; 2) the
way in which consequential moral lapses by politicians, businessexecutives, or church and university administrators are so often apologized
for as "mistakes in judgement," implying that it was the calculation that
was wrong, not the act, actor, or rationale. In short, politics is understood
as the simple harmonization of the plurality of group interests and not
about the formation of validity claims, collective principles and identities.
Any analysis of global capitalism
today must realize thatcontemporary capitalism can no
longer be restricted to the realm
economic production but must b
studied from all aspects of socia
life, including language, culture,
and everyday human affairs.
Quotable Quotes
In this country, populist politicians ignore the basic tenets of free enterprise which means thatservice provided by private businessmen on behalf of the government has a cost.
--- Malaya newspaper columnist Amado Macasaet commenting on the economic regulatory environment
in the Philippines
It only takes one word from the President and it would stop. I wonder why he doesnt say and d
so.--- Retired Archbishop Oscar Cruz of Lingayen-Dagupan on President Aquinos seemingly indecisive stand
on jueteng and illegal gambling
Saya kangen nasi goring, bakso dan rambutan. [I miss eating fried rice, meatballs, and rambutan.]
--- Barack Obama, President of the United States of America remarking on a recent state visit to
Indonesia.
THE CRUSADER
THEORY & POLITICS