the crimean war & the charge of the light brigade: history & film military history lecture...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
221 views
TRANSCRIPT
The Crimean War & The Charge of the Light Brigade: History & Film
Military History Lecture Series (November 11, 2010)
Dr. Robinson Yost, Assistant Professor, History Social Sciences Department
Attack, sir? Attack what? What guns, sir? Lord Lucan
There, my Lord, is your enemy; there are your guns. Captain Nolan
Allow me to point out to you that there is a battery in front, battery on each flank, and the ground is covered with Russian riflemen. Lord Cardigan
I know it. But Lord Raglan will have it. We have no choice but to obey . Lord Lucan
“Russian War” (1853-1856)
Results?
o weaker Russia
o stronger France
o ended Concert of Europe
o 750,000 – 1 million dead
Origins?
o religious
o political
The War?
o technology
o mismanagement
o tactics
Punch (April, 1853)
Brave or Stupid?
George Charles Bingham (1800-1888)Lord Lucan
James Thomas Brudenell (1797-1868)
Lord Cardigan
As to Lord Cardigan, he has as much brains as my boot, and is only equally in want of intellect by his relation Lord “Look-on.” Without mincing words, two bigger fools could not be picked out of the British Army to take command.
Charge of the Light Brigade (Oct. 25, 1854)
The Charge
o why? Raglan’s order:
“Lord Raglan wishes the cavalry to advance rapidly to the front, and try to prevent the enemy carrying away the guns. Troop of horse artillery may accompany. French cavalry is on your left. Immediate.”
o results?
118 killed
134 wounded/57 prisoner
475 horse killed or shot after
only 195 men mounted
1936
1968
Charge of the Light Brigade: Lessons?
The Historical Event:
unclear orders
old tactics versus new technology
diffusion of responsibility
incompetent British officer corps
Tennyson’s version of the charge
The Films Depicting the Event:
1936 version: visually accurate, historically inaccurate
Concocts a fictional “reason why”: Errol Flynn is the hero
Certainty among mid-1930s uncertainties: Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin
1968 version: visually accurate, historically more accurate but misleading
Targeting British social order: Old (bad) versus New (good)
Anti-war, Vietnam parallels: a far-away war, mismanaged & futile