the charter of fundamental rights of the european...

Flash Eurobarometer 416

THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

REPORT

Fieldwork: February 2015

Publication: May 2015

This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and

Consumers and co-ordinated by Directorate-General for Communication.

This document does not represent the point of view of the European Commission. The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors.

Flash Eurobarometer 416 - TNS Political & Social

Project title

Flash Eurobarometer 416 “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU”

Linguistic Version EN

Catalogue Number DS-04-15-181-EN-N

ISBN 978-92-79-47459-0

DOI 10.2838/693976

© European Union, 2015

Flash Eurobarometer 416

The Charter of Fundamental Rights

of the European Union

Conducted by TNS Political & Social at the request of the European Commission, Directorate-General for

Justice and Consumers

Survey co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM “Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer” Unit)

FLASH EUROBAROMETER 416 “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU”

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 2

MAIN FINDINGS .................................................................................................................. 4

I. FAMILIARITY WITH THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF

THE EUROPEAN UNION ........................................................................................... 6

II. AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPLICATION OF THE

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ..... 10

1. Awareness of the legal status of the Charter ............................................. 10

2. Knowledge of the application of the Charter .............................................. 14

III. INSTITUTIONS/BODIES TO WHICH CITIZENS WOULD TURN IN

CASE THEIR RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED ................................................ 30

IV. INFORMATION ABOUT THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF

THE EUROPEAN UNION ......................................................................................... 36

ANNEXES

Technical specifications

Questionnaire

Tables


2

INTRODUCTION

The European Charter of Fundamental Rights1 sought, upon its introduction in 2000, to

bring together in one place the various citizens’ rights enshrined in a range of European

and national laws and conventions. Provisions covering the freedom, dignity and equality

of Europeans were thus combined in one European charter for the first time.

The Charter became legally binding in 2009 when the Lisbon Treaty came into effect, and

marked its fifth anniversary as a binding document in December 2014.

The aim of the Charter is to hold European institutions and bodies to the highest

standards of human rights. National governments are also legally obliged to observe the

Charter’s provisions when they are enacting European law.

The Charter gives citizens a better opportunity to understand their rights and to access

clear information about them. This Flash Eurobarometer tests how familiar citizens are

with the Charter five years after its enactment as a legally binding document.

The questions asked within this Flash Eurobarometer were already asked in 2012 (“Flash

Eurobarometer 340”2), making it possible to see whether familiarity with the Charter and

understanding of the rights it enshrines has increased over the last three years.

As well as testing respondents’ awareness of the Charter itself and their knowledge of

when it does and doesn’t apply, the survey asks respondents where they would turn to if

they feel that their rights are being violated. It also asks whether respondents would like

to receive more information about the Charter and about their rights as European

citizens.

The findings of this survey have been analysed firstly at EU level and secondly by

country. Where appropriate, a variety of socio-demographic variables, such as

respondents’ gender, age, education and occupation, have been used to provide greater

insight. As mentioned above, emphasis is placed throughout on the trend evolutions

since 2012.

In the course of this survey, 26,549 European citizens aged 15 and above were

interviewed by telephone (fixed-line and mobile phone) by the TNS Political & Social

network between 16 and 18 February 2015 in all 28 European Union Member States, as

requested by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers

(DG JUST). The methodology used is that of surveys as carried out by the Directorate

General for Communication (“Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and

Eurobarometer” Unit)3. A technical note on the methodology for interviews conducted by

the institutes within the TNS Political & Social network is annexed to this report. This

note indicates the interview methods and the confidence intervals.

1 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm 2 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_340_en.pdf 3 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm


3

Note: In this report, countries are referred to by their official abbreviation. The

abbreviations used in this report correspond to:

ABBREVIATIONS BE Belgium LT Lithuania BG Bulgaria LU Luxembourg CZ Czech Republic HU Hungary DK Denmark MT Malta DE Germany NL The Netherlands EE Estonia AT Austria EL Greece PL Poland ES Spain PT Portugal FR France RO Romania

HR Croatia SI Slovenia IE Ireland SK Slovakia IT Italy FI Finland CY Republic of Cyprus* SE Sweden LV Latvia UK The United Kingdom EU28 European Union – 28 Member States

* Cyprus as a whole is one of the 28 European Union Member States. However, the ‘acquis communautaire’ has

been suspended in the part of the country which is not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus.

For practical reasons, only the interviews carried out in the part of the country controlled by the government of

the Republic of Cyprus are included in the ‘CY’ category and in the EU28 average.

* * * * *

We wish to thank the respondents throughout Europe who have given their time to take

part in this survey. Without their active participation, this study would not have been

possible.


4

MAIN FINDINGS

General awareness of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

remains rather high, whereas actual knowledge remains low.

Nearly two-thirds of respondents (65%, +1 point since 2012) say they are

familiar with the Charter.

While only 14% of respondents know what the Charter is, that proportion has

gone up from 11% in 2012.

The proportion of respondents who know what the Charter is ranges from 24% in

Spain to 6% in both Denmark and Latvia, and 5% in Portugal.

The largest increase in knowledge of the Charter since 2012 is observed in Greece

(16%, +8 points).

However, precise knowledge of when the Charter does and does not apply is

still low. The greatest confusion rests around whether the Charter applies to all

actions of Member States, including matters of national competence.

More than seven respondents out of ten know that the Charter is legally binding

(no change since 2012).

This is the case for a majority of respondents in all Member States: from 84% in

Hungary to 59% in Denmark.

As in 2012, precise knowledge of when the Charter does and does not apply is

nevertheless still low. When given specific scenarios, only 13% (-1 point since

2012) of respondents are able to correctly identify in all 3 cases which are true

and which are false.

A majority of respondents (57%, +2 points since 2012) say, wrongly, that the

Charter applies to all actions of EU Member States, including on matters of

national competence.

Two-thirds of respondents (67%, no change) say, correctly, that the Charter

applies to all actions of EU institutions and bodies.

And a majority of respondents (62%, -1 point since 2012) say, correctly, that the

Charter applies to EU Member States only when they implement EU law.

As in 2012, the institution to which citizens would be most likely to turn in case

their rights are being violated is a national court.

Most respondents (43%) would turn to a national court in the event that their

Charter rights had been violated and they wished to make a complaint. However,

a decrease of 3 points is observed since 2012.

Then, a similar proportion of respondents said they would turn to an EU institution

(38%, -2 points), an ombudsman (37%, -3 points) and the police (37%, +2

points).

Interestingly, when asked to identify the first place they would turn to,

respondents are more likely to say they would go to the police (21%) than courts

(20%) or an ombudsman (20%).

In 13 Member States, respondents are more likely to say that they would turn to

a court in their own country if their rights had been violated, while in seven

countries they would be more likely to turn to an ombudsman or independent

body.


5

General interest in information about the Charter remains high.

At least six out of ten respondents would like more information about the content

of the Charter (64%, -2 points), where to turn if their rights are violated (63%, -2

points), and when the Charter applies and when it does not (60%, no change).

A majority of respondents are interested in having more information about these

aspects related to the Charter in all Member States except Finland and Estonia.

Nevertheless, less than half of the respondents (43%, -2 points) are interested in

getting more information about the historical and political context of the Charter.

In several Member States there have been noticeable declines in the level of

interest in getting more information about these issues. It is especially the case in

Lithuania, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal, where a decrease of at least 6 points is

observed for the four items.

In contrast, in Greece, where a high increase of knowledge and awareness of the

Charter has been observed, there is also a general increase in the level of

interest.


6

I. FAMILIARITY WITH THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL

RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

- There has been an increase in the proportion of respondents who know what

the Charter is, from 11% in 2012 to 14% in 2015 -

Respondents were asked first if they are familiar with the EU Charter of Fundamental

Rights. Overall, nearly two-thirds of respondents (65%) say they are familiar with the

Charter, a slight increase on the 64% of respondents who said they were familiar with it

in January 2012. Of the 65%, 14% (+3 compared with 2012) say they are familiar with

the Charter and know what it is, and 51% (-2) have heard about it but are not sure what

it is. Over a third of respondents (35%, -1) have never heard about the EU Charter of

Fundamental Rights.

Spain (24%), Austria (21%) and Germany (19%) have the highest proportions of

respondents who are familiar with the Charter and know what it is. However, elsewhere,

relatively few respondents are familiar with the Charter and know what it is, such as in

Portugal (5%), Denmark and Latvia (both 6%).

General familiarity is highest in Croatia (84%), the Czech Republic (82%) and Sweden

(79%). In contrast, at least half of the respondents say they have never heard about the

Charter in Cyprus (52%) and Denmark (51%).


7

The proportion of respondents who are familiar with the Charter and know what it is has

increased substantially in several Member States, such as Greece (16%, +8 compared

with January 2012), Slovenia (13%, +5), Spain (24%, +4), Italy (14%, +4) and Cyprus

(13%, +4). There were nevertheless noticeable declines in the level of familiarity in

Luxembourg (12%, -4) and Portugal (5%, -3).

In Greece, this general increase in terms of awareness and knowledge may be explained

by the fact that the Charter has been mentioned in the media on numerous occasions in

last year.


8

In 2007, a majority (51%) of respondents answered that they had never heard of the

Charter. This was before the Charter was officially adopted by the EU, and so it is not

surprising that respondents may not have been familiar with the Charter. Since adoption

by the EU, however, a majority of respondents are familiar with the Charter and the

proportion who knows what the Charter is has been steadily increasing (+6 from 2007 to

2015).

Looking at the country trends since 2007, there has been an increase in the proportion of

respondents who know what the Charter is in all but eight countries. There were only five

countries where there was a decrease: Slovakia, Ireland, Luxembourg, Denmark and

Portugal. Over this period, the largest increase is seen in Austria (+13) and Germany

(+12), although most of this increase happened between 2007 and 2012.


9

There are some socio-demographic variations in terms of the level of familiarity with the

Charter. Respondents who completed their education aged 20 or over are more likely to

say that they are familiar with the Charter and know what it is than respondents who left

school aged 15 or below (19% vs. 9%).

Respondents who live in large towns (17%) are more likely than those who live in rural

villages (11%) to be familiar with the Charter and to know what it is.

In terms of the respondents’ occupations, employees and self-employed respondents

(both 16%) are the most likely to be familiar with the Charter and to know what it is,

while manual workers (7%) are least likely.


10

II. AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPLICATION OF

THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE

EUROPEAN UNION

1. AWARENESS OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE CHARTER

- As in 2012, more than seven respondents in ten know that the Charter is

legally binding -

Respondents were asked whether they think the Charter is legally binding, or in other

words, whether any court in the EU can ensure that the rights enshrined in the Charter

are respected. A quarter of respondents (25%, no change since 2012) think it is

definitely binding, while 46% (no change) say that it is probably binding. 14% of

respondents (no change) think that the Charter probably is not legally binding, and just

7% (+1) say that it definitely is not binding. Less than a tenth of respondents (8%, -1)

don’t know whether the Charter is legally binding.

In all Member States a majority of respondents think that the Charter is definitely or

probably legally binding. The proportion of respondents who think it is definitely or

probably binding ranges from 84% in Hungary and 81% in Romania, to 59% in Denmark

and 60% in Sweden.

In 10 countries, at least three out of ten respondents say that the Charter is definitely

legally binding: respondents in Hungary, Italy and Lithuania (all 36%) are the most likely

to say this, while those in Sweden (11%) and Finland (12%) are the least likely to do so.

A relatively high proportion of respondents in Estonia (23%) and Malta (15%) say they

don’t know.


11

While the proportion of respondents who think that the Charter is definitely or probably

legally binding has not changed at EU level since 2012, there have been substantial

variations in individual Member States. The proportion of respondents who say that it is

definitely or probably binding increased the most in Hungary (84%, +11), Italy (76%,

+9) and Greece (66%, +7), while declining the most in Portugal (63%, -10), Ireland

(70%, -8), Sweden (60%, -8), Cyprus (62%, -7), the Czech Republic (73%, -7),

Slovenia (67%, -7) and Spain (66%, -7).


12

* NA = not asked. The question was not asked in this country during the preceding survey.


13

The socio-demographic results show that women are somewhat more likely than men

(73% vs. 69%) to say that the Charter is definitely or probably legally binding. Younger

respondents are also more likely to say this: 75% of 15-39 year-olds think the Charter is

definitely or probably legally binding, as opposed to 68% of respondents aged 55 and

over.

Respondents who completed their education aged 16 or above (72-73%) are more likely

than those who finished their education at a younger age (63%) to think that the Charter

is definitely or probably legally binding. Employees (74%) are the most likely and self-

employed respondents (67%) the least likely of the occupational groups to give this

answer.

Individuals who are familiar with the Charter are more likely than those who have never

heard about it to say that it is definitely or probably legally binding (75% vs. 65%).


14

2. KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER

- While many respondents have heard of the Charter, it is unclear

whether many respondents really understand how it should be applied -

In this section of the report, respondents are given three statements relating to the

application of the Charter, and are asked to say whether the statement is true or false.

“The Charter applies to all actions of EU institutions and bodies.”

The first statement is that the Charter applies to all actions of EU institutions and bodies.

Two-thirds of respondents (67%, no change since 2012) say correctly that this is true,

while around a fifth of respondents (21%, +1) say it is not true.

More than half of the respondents in all Member States say, correctly, that this

statement is true. The proportion of respondents answering correctly ranges from 79% in

Ireland and 77% in Luxembourg, to 51% in Cyprus to 54% in Estonia. However, over

three out of ten respondents think that the Charter does not apply to all actions of EU

institutions and bodies in Cyprus and Greece (both 32%), while in Estonia (32%) and

Malta (25%) a relatively high proportion of respondents say they don’t know if the

statement is true or false.


15

The proportion of respondents who say, correctly, that the Charter applies to all actions

of EU institutions and bodies has increased in most Member States since 2012, with

Finland (69%, +10), Hungary (71%, +8), Luxembourg (77%, +7), Greece (56%, +6)

and Lithuania (72%, +5) recording the biggest increases. However, there were also

substantial declines in the proportion of respondents saying correctly that this statement

is true in certain Member States, notably in Cyprus (51%, -10), Slovenia (65%, -7) and

Poland (68%, -5).


16



17

The socio-demographic data shows that older respondents are the least likely to think

the Charter applies to all actions of EU institutions and bodies: 62% of respondents aged

55 and over say the statement is true, compared with 68-71% of younger respondents.

Education is an important factor here: while 72% of respondents who finished their

education aged 20 and over say correctly that the Charter applies to all actions of EU

institutions and bodies, only 55% of respondents who left school aged 15 or under say

the statement is true.

Among the different occupational groups, employees (74%) are the most likely to say

correctly that the statement is true, while respondents who are not working (63%) are

the least likely to do so.

Respondents who know what the Charter is are more likely to think that the Charter

applies to all actions of EU institutions and bodies than those who have never heard

about it (73% vs. 62%). And while three-quarters of respondents (75%) who think that

the Charter is legally binding say this statement is true, only around half of respondents

(51%) who say it is not legally binding are correct in saying that the statement in true.


18

“The Charter applies to all actions of EU Member States, including on matters of

national competence.”

A majority of respondents (57%, +2 compared with 2012) say, incorrectly, that it is true

that the Charter applies to all actions of EU Member States, including on matters of

national competence. Roughly three out of ten respondents (31%, -1) say, correctly, that

the statement is false, while 12% (-1) don’t know.

Denmark stands out as being the only country where a majority of respondents give the

correct answer: 49% say the statement is false, while 40% say it is true. Nearly four out

of ten respondents also say correctly that the Charter does not apply to all actions of EU

Member States in Cyprus (39%), Austria (38%), France (38%) and Greece (38%).

Romania (72%) has the highest proportion of respondents who say, wrongly, that the

statement is true, followed by Croatia, Ireland and Latvia (all 66%). Malta and Estonia

(both 25%) again have a relatively high proportion of respondents who don’t know.


19

The proportion of respondents who say, correctly, that the statement is false has

increased substantially since 2012 in Cyprus (39%, +9), Slovenia (30%, +8), Estonia

(28%, +5) and Spain (35%, +5). There were also noticeable declines in the proportion of

respondents saying that the Charter does not apply to all actions of EU Member States in

Finland (32%, -9), Bulgaria (22%, -8), Latvia (18%, -7), Portugal (24%, -6), Malta

(16%, -6), Romania 18%, -5), the Netherlands (35%, -5), Luxembourg (26%, -5), and

Lithuania (19%, -5).


20



21

According to the socio-demographic results, men are slightly more likely than women

(33% vs. 29%) to say, correctly, that the statement is false. Respondents who finished

their education aged 20 or above are also somewhat more likely than those who finished

at a younger age to say, correctly, that the Charter does not apply to all actions of EU

Member States (34% vs. 29%).

Respondents who know what the Charter is are somewhat more likely to say that it does

not apply to all actions of EU Member States than those who have never heard about it

(35% vs. 29%). Respondents who think that the Charter is not legally binding (49%) are

more likely to say correctly that the statement is false than respondents who say that it

is legally binding (27%).


22

“The Charter applies to EU Member States only when they implement EU law.”

Over six out of ten respondents (62%, -1) say, correctly, that this statement is true,

while roughly a quarter (26%, +2) say, incorrectly, that it is false. 12% (-1) don’t know

whether the Charter applies to EU Member States only when they implement EU law.

Following on from the previous two results, we can see that a majority of respondents

said in all three cases that the statement was true. This suggests that the results should

be treated with caution: it is possible that some respondents answered “true” in all three

cases without really knowing how the Charter should be applied in each particular case.

The proportion of respondents who say, correctly, that the Charter applies to EU Member

States only when they implement EU law ranges from 75% in Bulgaria and 72% in

Romania, to 51% in Italy and 52% in Malta.

Italy (34%) and the Netherlands (33%) have the highest proportions of respondents who

say, wrongly, that this statement is false. 29% of respondents in Estonia and 24% in

Malta say they don’t know if the statement is true or false.


23

The proportion of respondents who say, correctly, that this statement is true has

increased substantially since 2012 in Greece (63%, +6), Sweden (62%, +6) and

Denmark (65%, +5). However, the UK (56%, -6) registered a relatively large decline in

the proportion of respondents saying, correctly, that the Charter applies to EU Member

States only when they implement EU law.


24



25

Respondents who finished their education aged 20 or over are also somewhat more likely

than those who finished at age 15 or under to say, correctly, that the Charter applies to

EU Member States only when they implement EU law (64% vs. 57%). Of the different

occupation groups, manual workers (68%) are the most likely to say, correctly, that this

statement is true, while self-employed respondents (59%) are the least likely to do so.

Respondents who believe that the Charter is legally binding (66%) are more likely to say

correctly that the statement is true than those who think it is not legally binding (55%).


26

Overall knowledge of the Charter

Most respondents display some knowledge of the Charter, although relatively few

respondents have extensive knowledge of it. Just over one respondent in ten (13%, -1

compared with 2012) gives three correct answers, while over four out of ten (44%, no

change) are able to give two correct answers. A third of respondents (33%, +2) give one

correct answer, and a tenth of respondents (10%, -1) give no correct answers.


27

Denmark (23%, +2), France (18%, +1) and Belgium (18%, no change) have the highest

proportions of respondents who give three correct answers, while Malta (4%, -7), the UK

(6%, -2) and Cyprus (7%, -3) have the lowest. Malta also had the largest decrease (-7)

in respondents who answered all three correctly.

The proportion of respondents who are able to give at least two correct answers ranges

from 66% (+9) in Hungary and 64% (+4) in Belgium, to 46% in both Estonia (+1) and

Malta (-2), and 48% (+1) in Italy. Estonia (22%, -8) and Malta (19%, +1) have the

highest proportions of respondents who answered all three questions incorrectly.

However, the largest decrease in the proportion of respondents who answered none of

the questions correctly was in Hungary and Estonia (both -8), suggesting that, despite

Estonia being lower in knowledge of the Charter overall, there has been an improvement.


28



29

The socio-demographic data show that respondents who finished their education aged 20

or over are more likely than those who finished school aged 15 or under to give three

correct answers (16% vs. 6%), and also at least two correct answers (61% vs. 50%). Of

the different occupation groups, manual workers (61%) are the most likely to provide at

least two correct answers, while self-employed respondents (53%) are the least likely to

do so.

Individuals who think that the Charter is legally binding are more likely to give at least

two correct answers (61%) than respondents who think the Charter is not legally binding

(52%).


30

III. INSTITUTIONS/BODIES TO WHICH CITIZENS WOULD

TURN IN CASE THEIR RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED

- National courts are the institution that respondents would be most likely to

turn to in the event of their Charter rights being violated4. However, there has

been a decrease in the proportion of respondents who would take this option. -

Respondents were asked which institution or body they would turn to, in the event that

their Charter rights had been violated and they wished to make a complaint.

A court in their own country is the place most respondents would turn to: 43% say they

would turn to a national court, down from 46% who said this in January 2012.

More than a third of respondents would turn to an EU institution (38%, -2 compared with

2012), a national ombudsman or independent body (37%, -3), or their national police

(37%, +2).

Roughly a quarter of respondents say that they would turn to the national government

(24%, -1), while 13% of respondents (no change) would turn to an NGO.

Just 7% (+2) of respondents say spontaneously that they would not complain.

The following graph shows only the respondents’ first answer when asked which

institution or body they would turn to should their Charter rights be violated.

4 This section consisted of two parts and allowed the respondent to choose more than one answer: in the first

part the respondent chose one answer corresponding to the first body he/she would turn to, and in the second part respondents chose other appropriate bodies to turn to (more than one was allowed). Whereas, generally speaking in cases where fundamental rights are violated, the institutions where redress can most likely be obtained are the national courts, it depends on the circumstances of every case whether it is most appropriate to turn to a national court, an ombudsman, the police, the government, an NGO, or an EU institution.


31

Around a fifth of respondents say that they would first of all turn to the national police

(21%, +2 compared with 2012), a national court (20%, -1), a national ombudsman or

independent body (20%, no change), or an EU institution (19%, no change). It is

interesting to note that the police are now the first institution in this hierarchy.

In contrast, relatively few respondents say that they would turn first to their national

government (8%, -1) or an NGO (4%, no change).

The proportion of respondents who say they would turn to a court in their own country

ranges from 60% in Lithuania and 57% in Austria, to 29% in Ireland and 30% in France.

At least 50% of respondents say they would turn to a national court in nine Member

States.

Hungary (50%) has the highest proportion of respondents who say they would turn to an

EU institution, followed by Luxembourg (48%). At the other end of the scale, only 22%

of respondents in Finland and 25% in Poland say they would turn to an EU institution if

their Charter rights were violated.

In contrast, Poland (67%) has the highest proportion of respondents who say they would

turn to a national ombudsman or independent body. At least 50% of respondents in eight

Member States say they would do this. Elsewhere, such as in Romania (6%) and

Lithuania and Cyprus (both 10%), relatively few respondents would take this option.

The proportion of respondents who say they would turn to the police in their own country

ranges from 54% in Belgium and 51% in the UK, to 22% in Hungary and 25% in Malta.

The UK (50%) stands out as having by far the highest proportion of respondents who say

they would turn to their national government if their Charter rights were violated;

Luxembourg (36%) has the next highest. Only 8% of respondents in Estonia, and 9% in

both Finland and Slovenia, would seek help from the government.


32

The UK (30%) also has the highest proportion of respondents who say they would turn to

an NGO. At least a fifth of respondents would also do this in Belgium (22%), Croatia

(20%) and France (20%).

In eight Member States, at least a tenth of respondents say spontaneously that they

would not complain if their Charter rights were violated, and over a fifth of respondents

give this answer in Cyprus (21%).


33

The following chart shows which answers were most common in which Member States. In

13 countries respondents are most likely to say they would turn to a court in their own

country if their Charter rights were violated, while in six countries they are most likely to

say they would turn to an EU institution. In seven countries, respondents are most likely

to say that they would turn to a national ombudsman or independent body, and in the

remaining two Member States – Belgium and Sweden – a majority of respondents would

turn to the national police.


34

The socio-demographic results show that respondents aged 15-24 are the most likely to

turn to their national police if their Charter rights have been violated, whereas

respondents aged 55 and over are the least likely to turn to the police (49% vs. 31%).

15-24 year-olds are also the most likely to turn to their national government (31% vs.

22-24% of older respondents), but they are the least likely to turn to an ombudsman or

independent body (31% vs. 38-39%).

Individuals who finished their education aged 20 or above are the most likely to turn to

an EU institution (45% vs. 28% of respondents who left school aged 15 or below) or to a

national court (46% vs. 32%). However, they are the least likely to turn to their national

government (20% vs. 26%) or to the police (31% vs. 39%).

Manual workers are the most likely to turn to their national police (43% vs. 34% of self-

employed respondents), but they are the least likely to turn to an EU institution (33% vs.

43% of self-employed respondents) or to a national court (39% vs. 49% of employees).

Respondents who know what the Charter is are more likely than respondents who have

never heard about it to turn to an EU institution (48% vs. 33%) or to a national court

(47% vs. 40%). They are less likely to turn to their national government (21% vs. 26%)

or to the police (27% vs. 43%).

Respondents who say that the Charter is legally binding are more likely than respondents

who say it is not legally binding to turn to an EU institution (41% vs. 35%), their national

government (25% vs. 21%), the police (38% vs. 32%), or to a national court (47% vs.

36%).

Respondents who were able to give three correct answers about when the Charter

applies are the most likely to turn to an EU institution (48% vs. 21% of respondents who

gave no correct answers), or to a national court (46% vs. 31%).


35


36

IV. INFORMATION ABOUT THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL

RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

- Despite low knowledge about the Charter, there is a general interest in

receiving more information about it -

Finally, respondents were asked if they would be interested in receiving more information

about four particular aspects of the Charter.

A majority of respondents say they would be interested in receiving information about

three of these four aspects: the content of the Charter (64%, -2 compared with 2012);

where to turn if their rights are violated (63%, -2); and when the Charter applies and

when it does not (60%, no change).

However, only a minority of respondents (43%, -2) are interested in the historical and

political context of the Charter, versus 55% (+2) who are not interested in obtaining

more information about this aspect of it.

The country results reveal that respondents in Malta and Cyprus are consistently among

the most interested in learning about the Charter. This is particularly relevant because

respondents in these two countries were among the least likely to answer all three

questions in Q3 correctly. However, respondents in the UK, who were also among the

least likely to answer all three correctly (6%), and Estonia, who were most likely to get

no answers correct (22%), are least likely to want more information on the Charter.

In all Member States over 50% of respondents are interested in receiving information

about the content of the Charter. The proportion of respondents expressing interest in

this type of information ranges from 81% in Cyprus and 79% in Malta, to 51% in Estonia

and 52% in the UK.


37

At least 50% of respondents in all but two Member States are interested in receiving

information about where to turn if their Charter rights are violated. Malta (82%) and

Cyprus (81%) again have the highest proportions of respondents who are interested in

getting more information about this, while Estonia and Finland (both 49%) are the two

countries where less than half of the respondents express interest.

As before, over half of the respondents in all but two countries would like more

information about when the Charter applies and when it does not. The proportion of

respondents who would like more information on this subject ranges from 79% in Cyprus

and 77% in Ireland, to 46% in Finland and 48% in Estonia.


38

In contrast, over 50% of the respondents in just seven Member States would like more

information on the historical and political context of the Charter. Respondents in Romania

(57%) and Cyprus (56%) have the highest level of interest in this subject, while those in

Finland (25%) and Estonia (27%) are the least interested in getting more information

about this.

Since 2012, the level of interest in getting more information about the content of the

Charter has increased substantially in Denmark (73%, +8) and Greece (75%, +6).

However, elsewhere the level of interest has fallen noticeably, especially in Slovakia

(60%, -12), Poland (60%, -11), Slovenia (60%, -9), Ireland (77%, -8) and Lithuania

(69%, -8).


39

Furthermore, the level of interest in getting more information about where to turn if

one’s Charter rights are violated has declined substantially in several countries,

especially in Poland (57%, -11), Finland (49%, -10), Slovakia (62%, -9), Portugal (64%,

-9), Ireland (77%, -9), Lithuania (68%, -9) and the Czech Republic (55%, -8).

The level of interest in getting more information about when the Charter applies has

increased most in Greece (70%, +5) and Germany (60%, +4) since 2012. In a majority

of other countries, however, the level of interest has declined, most of all in Portugal

(58%, -10), Lithuania (62%, -9) and Poland (56%, -8).

There were notable increases in the proportion of respondents interested in getting more

information on the historical and political context of the Charter in Sweden (44%, +7)

and Greece (53%, +4), compared with 2012. However, in several other countries there

were substantial declines, such as in Poland (40%, -9), Slovakia (35%, -9), Cyprus

(56%, -8), Portugal (45%, -8), Estonia (27%, -7), Ireland (54%, -7), Lithuania (48%, -

7) and Luxembourg (50%, -7).


40


41

The socio-demographic data shows that respondents with a higher level of education are

more likely to be interested in receiving all types of information about the Charter. For

example, 66% of respondents who finished their education aged 20 or over are

interested in having more information about when the Charter applies and when it does

not, compared with only 47% of respondents who finished their education aged 15 and

under.

In most cases, employees and self-employed respondents are the most likely to be

interested in getting more information, while manual workers are the least likely to be

interested. For example, 66% of self-employed respondents would like more information

about where to turn if their Charter rights are violated, versus 58% of manual workers.

Individuals who know what the Charter is are more likely than those who have not heard

about it to want more information. For example, 52% of respondents who know what the

Charter is would like more information about its historical and political context, as

opposed to 35% of respondents who have not heard about it.

Respondents who say that the Charter is legally binding are also more likely to want

more information: for example, 69% of respondents who say it is legally binding would

like more information about the Charter’s content, compared with 56% of respondents

who do not believe it is legally binding.

Respondents who were able to give three correct answers about the application of the

Charter are the most likely to want more information about it, while respondents who

gave no correct answers are the least likely to do so. For example, 70% of respondents

who gave three correct answers, but only 50% of those who gave no correct answers,

are interested in getting more information about the Charter’s content.


42

ANNEXES

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS


TS1

FLASH EUROBAROMETER 416 “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 16th and the 18th of February 2015, TNS Political & Social, a consortium created between TNS political & social, TNS UK and TNS opinion, carried out the survey FLASH EUROBAROMETER 416 about “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”. This survey has been requested by the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers. It is a general public survey co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM “Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer” Unit). The FLASH EUROBAROMETER 416 covers the population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the 28 Member States and aged 15 years and over. The survey covers the national population of citizens as well as the population of citizens of all the European Union Member States that are residents in these countries and have a sufficient command of the national languages to answer the questionnaire. All interviews were carried using the TNS e-Call center (our centralized CATI system). In every country respondents were called both on fixed lines and mobile phones. The basic sample design applied in all states is multi-stage random (probability). In each household, the respondent was drawn at random following the "last birthday rule". TNS has developed its own RDD sample generation capabilities based on using contact telephone numbers from responders to random probability or random location face to face surveys, such as Eurobarometer, as seed numbers. The approach works because the seed number identifies a working block of telephone numbers and reduces the volume of numbers generated that will be ineffective. The seed numbers are stratified by NUTS2 region and urbanisation to approximate a geographically representative sample. From each seed number the required sample of numbers are generated by randomly replacing the last two digits. The sample is then screened against business databases in order to exclude as many of these numbers as possible before going into field. This approach is consistent across all countries.


TS2

Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits:

various sample sizes are in rows various observed results are in columns

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

N=50 6,0 8,3 9,9 11,1 12,0 12,7 13,2 13,6 13,8 13,9 N=50

N=500 1,9 2,6 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,4 N=500

N=1000 1,4 1,9 2,2 2,5 2,7 2,8 3,0 3,0 3,1 3,1 N=1000

N=1500 1,1 1,5 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,5 N=1500

N=2000 1,0 1,3 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,2 N=2000

N=3000 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,8 N=3000

N=4000 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 N=4000

N=5000 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 N=5000

N=6000 0,6 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 N=6000

N=7000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,2 1,2 N=7000

N=7500 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=7500

N=8000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=8000

N=9000 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=9000

N=10000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=10000

N=11000 0,4 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=11000

N=12000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=12000

N=13000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 N=13000

N=14000 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=14000

N=15000 0,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=15000

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50%

Statistical Margins due to the sampling process

(at the 95% level of confidence)


TS3

ABBR. COUNTRIES INSTITUTES N° INTERVIEWS

FIELDWORK DATES

POPULATION 15+

BE Belgium TNS Dimarso 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 8.939.546 BG Bulgaria TNS BBSS 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 6.537.510 CZ Czech Rep. TNS Aisa s.r.o 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 9.012.443 DK Denmark TNS Gallup A/S 1009 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 4.561.264 DE Germany TNS Infratest 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 64.336.389 EE Estonia TNS Emor 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 945.733 IE Ireland IMS Millward Brown 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 3.522.000 EL Greece TNS ICAP 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 8.693.566 ES Spain TNS Demoscopia S.A 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 39.127.930 FR France TNS Sofres 1003 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 47.756.439 HR Croatia HENDAL 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 3.749.400 IT Italy TNS ITALIA 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 51.862.391 CY Rep. of Cyprus CYMAR 501 16/02/2015 17/02/2015 660.400 LV Latvia TNS Latvia 1002 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 1.447.866 LT Lithuania TNS LT 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 2.829.740 LU Luxembourg TNS Dimarso 500 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 434.878 HU Hungary TNS Hoffmann Kft 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 8.320.614 MT Malta MISCO International Ltd 506 16/02/2015 17/02/2015 335.476 NL Netherlands TNS NIPO 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 13.371.980 AT Austria TNS Austria 1002 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 7.009.827 PL Poland TNS OBOP 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 32.413.735 PT Portugal TNS EUROTESTE 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 8.080.915 RO Romania TNS CSOP 1007 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 18.246.731 SI Slovenia RM PLUS 1009 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 1.759.701 SK Slovakia TNS AISA Slovakia 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 4.549.956 FI Finland TNS Gallup Oy 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 4.440.004 SE Sweden TNS SIFO 1000 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 7.791.240 UK United Kingdom TNS UK 1001 16/02/2015 18/02/2015 51.848.010

TOTAL EU28

26.545

16/02/2015

18/02/2015 412.585.684

QUESTIONNAIRE


Q1

Q1

1

234

Q2

12345

No, probably notNo, definitely notDK\NA

FL340 Q2 TREND MODIFIED


READ OUT: The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights defines certain political, social and economic rights for citizens in the EU. These rights are mainly described in six chapters on areas such as Dignity, Freedoms, Equality, Solidarity, Citizens’ Rights and Justice. To simplify, we will use the term Charter throughout the questionnaire. (M)

Do you think that the Charter is legally binding? In other words, do you think any court in the European Union can ensure that the rights enshrined in the Charter are respected? (m)

(READ OUT – ONE ANSWER ONLY)

Yes, definitelyYes, probably

Are you familiar with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?


Yes, and you know what it isYes, you have heard about it, but you are not sure what it is

No, you have never heard about it (M)DK\NA


Q2

Q3

1

2

3

Q4a

123456789DK\NA

FL340 Q4a

The police in (OUR COUNTRY)A court in (OUR COUNTRY)An ombudsman or an independent body in (OUR COUNTRY)A non-governmental organisation (NGO)Other (DO NOT READ OUT)None/ You would not complain (DO NOT READ OUT)


ROTATE CODE 1 TO 6

Imagine that you feel your rights, as enshrined in the Charter, are being violated, and you want to complain about it. To which institution or body would you turn? Firstly?


An EU institution (e.g. the European Commission or the European Parliament)(NATIONALITY) government

To all actions of EU Member States, including on matters of national competence

1 2 3

To EU Member States only when they implement EU law

1 2 3

(ROTATE) True False DK\NA

To all actions of EU institutions and bodies (e.g. when EU institutions adopt new legislation)

1 2 3

For each of the following statements, please tell me if you think that the statement is true or false: The Charter applies… (M)

(READ OUT - ONE ANSWER PER LINE)


Q3

Q4b

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,

An ombudsman or an independent body in (OUR COUNTRY)A non-governmental organisation (NGO)Other (DO NOT READ OUT)None/ You would not complain (DO NOT READ OUT)DK\NA

FL340 Q4b

And then?

(READ OUT – MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE)

An EU institution (e.g. the European Commission or the European Parliament)(NATIONALITY) governmentThe police in (OUR COUNTRY)A court in (OUR COUNTRY)

If code 8 or 9 in Q4a, go to Q5

Do not show answer given in Q4a if code 1 to 6

ROTATE CODE 1 TO 6

KEEP SAME ROTATION AS IN Q4a


Q4

Q5

1

2

3

4


The historical and political context of the Charter (when it has been adopted, by whom, etc.) (M)

1 2 3 4 5

When the Charter applies and when it does not (M)

1 2 3 4 5

The content of the Charter, defining your fundamental rights as an EU citizen (M)

1 2 3 4 5

Where to turn if your rights, as enshrined in the Charter, are violated (for example, a competent court or a body which can handle complaints) (M)

1 2 3 4 5

For each of the following aspects related to the Charter, would you be interested or not to have more information about it?

(READ OUT – ONE ANSWER PER LINE)

(ROTATE) Very interested

Fairly interested

Not very interested

Not at all interested

DK\NA

TABLES


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 14 3 51 -2 35 -1 0 0

BE 8 3 46 -3 46 0 0 0

BG 10 -1 63 -2 26 3 1 0

CZ 17 0 65 2 18 -1 0 -1

DK 6 -1 42 8 51 -7 1 0

DE 19 2 46 -9 35 7 0 0

EE 7 2 64 7 28 -10 1 1

IE 8 3 46 -7 46 4 0 0

EL 16 8 37 8 47 -16 0 0

ES 24 4 47 -4 29 0 0 0

FR 7 4 53 -1 39 -4 1 1

HR 15 69 16 0

IT 14 4 58 3 28 -7 0 0

CY 13 4 35 -2 52 0 0 -2

LV 6 1 53 -3 40 1 1 1

LT 9 2 57 0 34 -2 0 0

LU 12 -4 51 9 37 -5 0 0

HU 8 -1 63 5 29 -4 0 0

MT 7 0 42 10 49 -12 2 2

NL 10 0 60 4 30 -4 0 0

AT 21 4 57 -1 22 -3 0 0

PL 14 2 45 -14 40 11 1 1

PT 5 -3 48 -3 47 8 0 -2

RO 9 1 51 -1 39 -1 1 1

SI 13 5 63 -6 23 0 1 1

SK 13 2 63 -2 23 -1 1 1

FI 10 0 59 0 31 0 0 0

SE 14 0 65 4 20 -5 1 1

UK 13 3 42 -4 44 0 1 1

WN/KAJa, und Sie wissen, was

das ist

Oui, vous en avez entendu

parler mais vous n’êtes pas

sûr de ce que c’est

Yes, you have heard about it,

but you are not sure what it

is

Ja, Sie haben davon gehört,

aber Sie sind nicht sicher,

was das ist

Non, vous n’en avez jamais

entendu parler

No, you have never heard

about it

Nein, Sie haben noch nie von

der “Charta der Grundrechte

der Europäischen Union”

gehört

Oui, et vous savez ce

que c’est

Yes, and you know what

it is

NSP/SR

DK/NA

Q1 Connaissez-vous la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’UE ?

Q1 Are you familiar with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?

Q1 Kennen Sie die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union?

T1


%

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 25 0 46 0 14 0 7 1 8 -1 71 0 21 1

BE 20 -1 51 1 15 1 7 0 7 -1 71 0 22 1

BG 31 -3 44 2 8 0 9 -1 8 2 75 -1 17 -1

CZ 30 -1 43 -6 18 5 6 2 3 0 73 -7 24 7

DK 19 -8 40 5 23 5 8 0 10 -2 59 -3 31 5

DE 32 3 43 1 16 -1 4 -2 5 -1 75 4 20 -3

EE 19 -4 43 5 9 1 6 4 23 -6 62 1 15 5

IE 21 -10 49 2 16 7 5 2 9 -1 70 -8 21 9

EL 24 3 42 4 16 -2 12 0 6 -5 66 7 28 -2

ES 25 -4 41 -3 14 2 13 5 7 0 66 -7 27 7

FR 18 7 46 -6 19 -1 10 2 7 -2 64 1 29 1

HR 31 45 11 7 6 76 18

IT 36 4 40 5 12 -2 6 -1 6 -6 76 9 18 -3

CY 25 -9 37 2 18 8 12 4 8 -5 62 -7 30 12

LV 22 1 55 -2 10 -1 4 -1 9 3 77 -1 14 -2

LT 36 7 43 -4 8 -4 4 -1 9 2 79 3 12 -5

LU 24 0 49 2 16 0 6 0 5 -2 73 2 22 0

HU 36 5 48 6 9 1 4 -1 3 -11 84 11 13 0

MT 28 -15 48 17 7 0 2 1 15 -3 76 2 9 1

NL 20 -4 54 0 16 3 6 2 4 -1 74 -4 22 5

AT 28 1 46 3 17 0 5 -1 4 -3 74 4 22 -1

PL 16 -2 55 -4 11 0 6 3 12 3 71 -6 17 3

PT 18 -3 45 -7 14 4 9 3 14 3 63 -10 23 7

RO 35 -13 46 8 6 2 7 2 6 1 81 -5 13 4

SI 33 -8 34 1 17 4 8 2 8 1 67 -7 25 6

SK 35 0 43 -2 9 -2 6 1 7 3 78 -2 15 -1

FI 12 0 59 5 20 -3 4 -2 5 0 71 5 24 -5

SE 11 -4 49 -4 27 7 8 0 5 1 60 -8 35 7

UK 19 -1 50 -2 14 3 4 0 13 0 69 -3 18 3

Total 'Non'Nein, auf

keinen Fall

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Total 'Oui'

Total 'Yes'

Gesamt 'Ja'Ja, auf jeden

Fall

Oui,

probablement

Yes, probably

Ja,

wahrscheinlich

Non,

probablement

pas

No, probably not

Nein,

wahrscheinlich

nicht

Oui,

certainement

Yes, definitely

Non,

certainement

pas

No, definitely

not

Total 'Non'

Total 'No'

Q2 Pensez-vous que la Charte soit juridiquement contraignante ? En d’autres termes, pensez-vous que n’importe quelle cour au

sein de l’Union européenne puisse s’assurer que les droits contenus dans la Charte soient respectés ?

Q2 Do you think that the Charter is legally binding? In other words, do you think any court in the European Union can ensure that

the rights enshrined in the Charter are respected?

Q2 Kommen wir nun zum Rechtsstatus der Charta. Sind Sie der Meinung, dass diese rechtsverbindlich ist, d.h. dass jedes Gericht

in der Europäischen Union durchsetzen kann, dass die in der Charta verankerten Rechte gewahrt werden?

T2


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 67 0 21 1 12 -1

BE 73 2 20 2 7 -4

BG 69 -3 19 -2 12 5

CZ 68 4 21 -2 11 -2

DK 64 1 26 2 10 -3

DE 63 -2 23 1 14 1

EE 54 2 14 1 32 -3

IE 79 2 14 -2 7 0

EL 56 6 32 -2 12 -4

ES 70 -4 23 7 7 -3

FR 69 2 23 -2 8 0

HR 74 16 10

IT 60 3 26 7 14 -10

CY 51 -10 32 11 17 -1

LV 71 2 16 -4 13 2

LT 72 5 16 -2 12 -3

LU 77 7 14 -3 9 -4

HU 71 8 22 4 7 -12

MT 63 -1 12 -4 25 5

NL 72 1 22 1 6 -2

AT 67 3 25 1 8 -4

PL 68 -5 15 2 17 3

PT 68 2 19 -1 13 -1

RO 75 -2 16 2 9 0

SI 65 -7 25 7 10 0

SK 66 -2 22 0 12 2

FI 69 10 17 -12 14 2

SE 71 1 19 -3 10 2

UK 69 1 13 -4 18 3

Alle Maßnahmen der EU-Institutionen und -Organe (z.B. wenn die EU-Institutionen ein neues Gesetz einführen)

Vrai

TRUE

Wahr

Faux

FALSE

Falsch

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Q3.1 Pour chacune des affirmations suivantes, pouvez-vous me dire si vous pensez que l’affirmation est vraie ou fausse : la

Charte s’applique… A toutes les actions des institutions et organismes de l’UE (p.ex. quand les institutions de l’UE adoptent une nouvelle

législation)

Q3.1 For each of the following statements, please tell me if you think that the statement is true or false: The Charter applies…

To all actions of EU institutions and bodies (e.g. when EU institutions adopt new legislation)

Q3.1 Bitte sagen Sie mir für jede der folgenden Aussagen bezüglich der Anwendung der Charta, ob diese Ihrer Meinung nach

wahr oder falsch ist. Die Charta findet Anwendung auf …

T3


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 57 2 31 -1 12 -1

BE 60 4 33 0 7 -4

BG 65 4 22 -8 13 4

CZ 53 6 37 -3 10 -3

DK 40 1 49 2 11 -3

DE 49 2 36 -4 15 2

EE 47 5 28 5 25 -10

IE 66 2 25 -1 9 -1

EL 52 7 38 -1 10 -6

ES 57 -2 35 5 8 -3

FR 54 0 38 -1 8 1

HR 66 24 10

IT 52 6 33 2 15 -8

CY 44 -6 39 9 17 -3

LV 66 4 18 -7 16 3

LT 65 6 19 -5 16 -1

LU 64 9 26 -5 10 -4

HU 58 5 33 4 9 -9

MT 59 5 16 -6 25 1

NL 57 5 35 -5 8 0

AT 53 4 38 0 9 -4

PL 58 -6 25 1 17 5

PT 63 6 24 -6 13 0

RO 72 4 18 -5 10 1

SI 57 -10 30 8 13 2

SK 64 -1 25 -2 11 3

FI 53 5 32 -9 15 4

SE 57 3 32 -1 11 -2

UK 64 2 18 -4 18 2

Alle Maßnahmen der EU-Mitgliedstaaten, d.h. auch auf Maßnahmen, die in die einzelstaatliche Zuständigkeit fallen

Vrai

TRUE

Wahr

Faux

FALSE

Falsch

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA


Charte s’applique…

A toutes les actions des Etats membres de l’UE, y compris les affaires de compétence nationale


To all actions of EU Member States, including on matters of national competence



T4


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 62 -1 26 2 12 -1

BE 69 3 23 -1 8 -2

BG 75 0 14 -5 11 5

CZ 60 2 28 -3 12 1

DK 65 5 23 -2 12 -3

DE 63 -2 24 0 13 2

EE 55 4 16 2 29 -6

IE 60 -4 32 2 8 2

EL 63 6 30 0 7 -6

ES 65 -4 26 4 9 0

FR 64 0 30 1 6 -1

HR 61 30 9

IT 51 1 34 9 15 -10

CY 58 -4 28 4 14 0

LV 67 0 20 1 13 -1

LT 70 -4 17 3 13 1

LU 62 -1 31 5 7 -4

HU 69 4 24 7 7 -11

MT 52 -4 24 3 24 1

NL 61 -2 33 2 6 0

AT 66 2 27 2 7 -4

PL 67 -4 15 -2 18 6

PT 62 -4 25 3 13 1

RO 72 -3 18 1 10 2

SI 56 -1 32 1 12 0

SK 60 -2 27 -1 13 3

FI 58 -3 26 0 16 3

SE 62 6 27 -5 11 -1

UK 56 -6 28 4 16 2

EU-Mitgliedstaaten nur dann, wenn diese EU-Recht umsetzen

Vrai

TRUE

Wahr

Faux

FALSE

Falsch

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA


Charte s’applique…

A tous les Etats membres de l’UE, seulement quand ils mettent en œuvre le droit européen


To EU Member States only when they implement EU law



T5


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 13 -1 44 0 33 2 10 -1

BE 18 0 46 4 30 -2 6 -2

BG 9 -6 54 2 31 3 6 1

CZ 15 -1 44 4 32 -3 9 0

DK 23 2 40 2 29 -1 8 -3

DE 15 -5 43 2 30 1 12 2

EE 13 2 33 -1 32 7 22 -8

IE 11 -3 48 3 35 -1 6 1

EL 9 0 46 3 37 3 8 -6

ES 14 -2 48 0 31 2 7 0

FR 18 1 41 -2 34 1 7 0

HR 10 46 37 7

IT 10 -1 38 2 39 6 13 -7

CY 7 -3 45 -2 36 6 12 -1

LV 8 -3 50 2 32 0 10 1

LT 10 0 51 -1 30 1 9 0

LU 12 -2 49 4 30 -2 9 0

HU 13 0 53 9 28 -1 6 -8

MT 4 -7 42 5 35 1 19 1

NL 17 -2 42 0 34 2 7 0

AT 17 0 44 3 31 -1 8 -2

PL 13 1 48 -5 26 0 13 4

PT 10 -3 47 0 31 1 12 2

RO 7 -4 56 -3 31 7 6 0

SI 8 1 46 0 35 -3 11 2

SK 9 -1 43 -4 39 6 9 -1

FI 14 -1 43 1 32 -1 11 1

SE 17 2 40 2 33 -5 10 1

UK 6 -2 44 -4 36 5 14 1

0 korrekte Antwort3 korrekte Antworten

2 réponses correctes

2 correct answers

2 korrekte Antworten

1 réponse correcte

1 correct answer

1 korrekte Antwort

3 réponses correctes

3 correct answers

0 réponse correcte

0 correct answer

Q3T - Connaissance de la Charte

Q3T - Knowledge of the Charter

Q3T - Kenntnis der Charta

T6


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 19 0 8 -1 21 2 20 -1

BE 17 -3 7 0 26 2 17 -3

BG 18 -1 6 -5 23 2 23 3

CZ 13 -1 3 1 17 -4 25 2

DK 17 -4 6 -2 26 7 21 3

DE 21 -1 7 0 22 7 26 -4

EE 13 -1 5 0 19 0 31 1

IE 12 0 11 -1 24 6 9 -1

EL 24 0 13 7 16 1 26 0

ES 15 0 8 -2 20 0 19 1

FR 29 -1 9 -1 20 1 13 1

HR 18 4 18 18

IT 29 9 9 -2 18 -3 22 0

CY 26 1 14 -2 15 -1 20 -6

LV 20 -4 4 0 19 4 27 -3

LT 11 -3 7 2 24 0 38 0

LU 17 0 13 -7 23 8 17 2

HU 25 -4 4 -1 13 4 24 5

MT 15 -12 16 3 17 4 15 1

NL 15 -3 6 0 18 5 23 -1

AT 16 -7 7 -2 18 7 32 4

PL 7 -2 2 0 22 1 14 -5

PT 18 -2 10 0 24 3 28 -2

RO 18 -8 7 0 28 4 28 0

SI 6 0 4 2 16 1 19 -4

SK 16 -2 6 1 22 5 18 -1

FI 9 -1 3 1 25 4 19 2

SE 22 -2 3 -1 28 6 21 -1

UK 14 2 14 -2 25 4 12 0

Q4a Imaginez que vous sentez que vos droits contenus dans la Charte sont violés et que vous voulez vous plaindre. Vers

quelles institutions ou organismes vous tourneriez-vous ? En premier?

Q4a Imagine that you feel your rights, as enshrined in the Charter, are being violated, and you want to complain about it.

To which institution or body would you turn? Firstly?

Q4a Angenommen Sie haben das Gefühl, dass Ihnen gegenüber gegen ein in der Charta verankertes Recht verstoßen

wurde und Sie wollen sich beschweren, an welche Institution bzw. welches Organ würden Sie sich wenden? Erstens?

Une institution européenne (p.ex. la

Commission européenne ou le

Parlement européen)

Le gouvernement

(NATIONALITE)

La police en (NOTRE

PAYS)

Une cour en (NOTRE

PAYS)

An eine EU-Institution (z.B. die

Europäische Kommission oder das

Europäische Parlament)

Die (NATIONALE)

Regierung

An die Polizei in

(UNSER LAND)

An ein Gericht in

(UNSER LAND)

An EU institution (e.g. the European

Commission or the European

Parliament)

(NATIONALITY)

government

The police in (OUR

COUNTRY)

A court in (OUR

COUNTRY)

T7


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 20 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4 0

BE 21 2 6 2 2 0 1 0 3 0

BG 16 1 5 1 1 -1 3 -1 5 1

CZ 33 2 3 0 1 -1 2 0 3 1

DK 16 -2 2 0 3 -1 1 0 8 -1

DE 12 -2 3 0 3 0 2 1 4 -1

EE 9 2 2 1 3 1 8 1 10 -5

IE 34 -2 6 0 1 -1 1 0 2 -1

EL 8 1 6 -3 1 -1 3 -6 3 1

ES 29 0 3 1 1 0 2 1 3 -1

FR 16 -3 7 1 2 1 1 0 3 1

HR 19 10 2 5 6

IT 11 -1 3 0 1 -1 2 0 5 -2

CY 7 3 3 0 1 -1 9 4 5 2

LV 17 1 3 -1 2 1 3 0 5 2

LT 5 -2 3 0 2 0 5 2 5 1

LU 17 -7 6 4 3 2 1 0 3 -2

HU 24 4 6 1 1 0 1 -2 2 -7

MT 19 0 4 -1 2 0 2 0 10 5

NL 30 -3 2 1 2 0 1 1 3 0

AT 14 0 7 2 4 -2 1 -1 1 -1

PL 45 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 5 3

PT 6 0 4 0 2 0 1 -1 7 2

RO 4 2 4 0 2 0 4 1 5 1

SI 42 3 6 2 2 -1 4 -1 1 -2

SK 27 -3 2 -2 2 1 2 -1 5 2

FI 34 -4 4 0 1 -1 1 0 4 -1

SE 18 2 2 1 1 -3 0 -1 5 -1

UK 20 -3 5 0 2 -1 1 0 7 0

Q4a Imaginez que vous sentez que vos droits contenus dans la Charte sont violés et que vous voulez vous plaindre. Vers

quelles institutions ou organismes vous tourneriez-vous ? En premier?

Q4a Imagine that you feel your rights, as enshrined in the Charter, are being violated, and you want to complain about it. To

which institution or body would you turn? Firstly?

Q4a Angenommen Sie haben das Gefühl, dass Ihnen gegenüber gegen ein in der Charta verankertes Recht verstoßen wurde

und Sie wollen sich beschweren, an welche Institution bzw. welches Organ würden Sie sich wenden? Erstens?

DK/NA

Un médiateur ou un

organisme indépendante en

(NOTRE PAYS)

Une organisation non-

gouvernementale

(ONG)

Autres (NE PAS

LIRE)

Aucunes / Vous ne vous

plaindriez pas (NE PAS

LIRE)

Andere (NICHT

VORLESEN)

Niemanden / Sie würden

sich nicht beschweren

(NICHT VORLESEN)

WN/KA

An einen Bürgerbeauftragten

oder eine unabhängige Stelle

in (UNSER LAND)

An eine

Nichtregierungs-

organisation (NGO)

NSP/SR

An ombudsman or an

independent body in (OUR

COUNTRY)

A non-governmental

organisation (NGO)

Other (DO NOT

READ OUT)

None/ You would not

complain (DO NOT READ

OUT)

T8


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 20 -2 17 0 16 -1 25 -2

BE 28 8 26 11 29 10 36 9

BG 25 -4 11 -3 10 1 18 -1

CZ 23 -2 9 -2 20 -1 27 -3

DK 17 -2 10 -4 11 2 18 -2

DE 16 -2 15 -1 12 -2 26 0

EE 21 -5 4 -5 10 3 20 1

IE 21 2 17 0 15 -1 20 1

EL 24 -1 13 8 13 3 26 2

ES 19 0 12 -3 14 -1 19 -2

FR 18 1 20 3 18 2 17 -3

HR 23 11 11 21

IT 15 -3 13 -1 13 -4 19 -2

CY 23 -13 6 -8 10 1 22 0

LV 26 -2 10 4 16 0 24 -4

LT 25 -3 13 3 13 2 25 -2

LU 32 11 24 7 24 10 32 11

HU 26 9 7 0 9 0 21 3

MT 21 -3 13 -3 9 -1 22 2

NL 20 -2 18 3 12 2 30 1

AT 21 5 16 4 20 9 25 5

PL 19 -6 8 1 14 4 31 1

PT 23 -17 13 -15 11 -15 28 -8

RO 19 -6 10 -3 14 2 25 1

SI 23 -12 6 1 11 1 28 4

SK 14 -10 6 -6 15 4 23 0

FI 14 1 6 1 21 0 14 -5

SE 19 3 9 2 20 2 24 2

UK 33 -1 39 -3 29 -6 38 -8

Q4b Et ensuite? (PLUSIEURS REPONSES POSSIBLES)

Q4b And then? (MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE)

Q4b Und dann? (MEHRFACHNENNUNGEN MÖGLICH)




Le gouvernement

(NATIONALITE)

La police en (NOTRE

PAYS)

Une cour en (NOTRE

PAYS)




Die (NATIONALE)

Regierung

An die Polizei in

(UNSER LAND)

An ein Gericht in

(UNSER LAND)



Parliament)

(NATIONALITY)

government

The police in (OUR

COUNTRY)

A court in (OUR

COUNTRY)

T9


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 19 -2 10 0 3 1 5 2 11 4

BE 32 12 17 8 2 -2 4 1 5 -1

BG 16 1 8 -1 2 -1 6 3 11 6

CZ 26 -5 8 -5 3 0 5 1 7 1

DK 13 -5 3 -2 5 1 9 6 16 6

DE 15 -1 5 -1 4 1 4 3 15 6

EE 9 4 3 1 4 2 11 0 26 0

IE 20 -1 9 0 3 -3 5 2 6 -2

EL 14 3 8 -3 1 -1 7 -4 8 5

ES 16 -1 7 3 3 0 8 5 11 5

FR 20 0 14 3 2 1 2 2 6 2

HR 18 11 5 6 7

IT 12 -2 5 -1 3 2 4 3 17 7

CY 4 -1 4 0 1 -1 14 7 19 12

LV 15 -1 5 -2 3 -1 5 1 16 9

LT 6 -2 5 -1 5 -1 6 1 14 3

LU 28 12 11 5 4 1 5 2 4 -2

HU 22 5 8 1 1 0 7 -3 14 -7

MT 13 -1 5 1 4 2 4 1 16 6

NL 21 3 5 -2 4 1 2 1 9 3

AT 21 2 12 6 8 2 6 0 13 1

PL 23 -3 9 2 2 0 1 0 8 4

PT 7 -22 6 -16 5 2 5 2 10 2

RO 3 1 6 0 6 1 15 0 14 1

SI 17 1 6 1 3 0 8 2 5 -3

SK 12 -5 7 -3 3 1 11 -1 15 4

FI 20 -1 7 -2 2 0 17 6 11 -1

SE 16 -1 5 2 3 -1 5 2 14 -6

UK 37 -6 27 -4 2 0 5 -1 7 4

Q4b Et ensuite? (PLUSIEURS REPONSES POSSIBLES)

Q4b And then? (MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE)

Q4b Und dann? (MEHRFACHNENNUNGEN MÖGLICH)

DK/NA

Un médiateur ou un

organisme indépendant en

(NOTRE PAYS)


gouvernementale

(ONG)

Autres (NE PAS

LIRE)



LIRE)

Andere (NICHT

VORLESEN)



(NICHT VORLESEN)

WN/KA



in (UNSER LAND)

An eine

Nichtregierungsorgani

sation (NGO)

NSP/SR

An ombudsman or an


COUNTRY)

A non-governmental

organisation (NGO)

Other (DO NOT

READ OUT)

None/ You would not


OUT)

T10


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

EU 28 38 -2 24 -1 37 2 43 -3

BE 45 6 32 11 54 12 52 6

BG 41 -5 15 -9 32 3 39 1

CZ 34 -4 12 0 36 -4 50 -2

DK 33 -5 15 -6 36 9 37 0

DE 36 -4 22 0 34 6 51 -4

EE 30 -5 8 -4 27 3 47 2

IE 32 2 27 -2 39 5 29 1

EL 46 0 25 14 28 4 51 4

ES 33 0 19 -6 33 -1 37 0

FR 46 0 28 1 38 4 30 -2

HR 39 14 28 37

IT 43 7 22 -2 30 -7 40 -1

CY 46 -12 19 -9 24 0 39 -7

LV 44 -6 13 3 34 4 49 -8

LT 33 -7 19 4 36 1 60 -3

LU 48 11 36 0 46 17 48 13

HU 50 6 11 0 22 5 44 9

MT 33 -15 28 0 25 3 35 3

NL 34 -5 23 3 30 7 52 0

AT 36 -2 22 2 37 15 57 10

PL 25 -8 10 2 35 4 43 -5

PT 40 -17 22 -15 34 -11 54 -10

RO 35 -14 17 -2 40 5 50 0

SI 28 -10 9 3 27 3 45 0

SK 29 -12 11 -5 35 7 40 0

FI 22 -1 9 2 45 4 32 -3

SE 40 1 11 1 47 8 43 0

UK 44 0 50 -4 51 -2 47 -7

Q4T - Imaginez que vous sentez que vos droits contenus dans la Charte sont violés et que vous voulez vous plaindre. Vers

quelles institutions/ organismes vous tourneriez-vous ? En premier? Et ensuite ?

Q4T - Imagine that you feel that your rights enshrined in the Charter are being violated, and you want to complain about

it. To which institution/ body would you turn? Firstly? And then ?






Le gouvernement

(NATIONALITE)

La police en (NOTRE

PAYS)

Une cour en (NOTRE

PAYS)




Die (NATIONALE)

Regierung

An die Polizei in

(UNSER LAND)

An ein Gericht in

(UNSER LAND)



Parliament)

(NATIONALITY)

government

The police in (OUR

COUNTRY)

A court in (OUR

COUNTRY)

T11


%Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash EB

416

Diff.

Flash EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 37 -3 13 0 4 0 7 2 4 -1

BE 52 13 22 10 4 -2 5 0 3 0

BG 30 1 13 1 3 -1 9 3 5 1

CZ 57 -4 10 -6 3 -1 7 1 3 1

DK 28 -6 5 -1 7 0 9 6 8 -1

DE 26 -3 7 -2 6 1 6 4 4 0

EE 17 6 4 1 7 3 17 2 10 -5

IE 54 -2 14 0 4 -3 7 3 2 -1

EL 21 4 14 -5 2 -1 9 -10 3 1

ES 44 -1 9 3 4 0 9 5 3 -1

FR 35 -4 20 3 4 2 2 1 3 1

HR 35 20 5 10 6

IT 22 -3 8 -1 3 0 6 3 5 -2

CY 10 1 6 -1 3 0 21 10 5 2

LV 30 -1 7 -3 4 0 8 1 5 2

LT 10 -5 7 -1 6 -1 10 3 5 1

LU 43 4 17 9 6 2 6 3 3 -2

HU 45 10 14 3 2 0 8 -4 2 -7

MT 30 -2 8 0 6 2 5 0 10 5

NL 50 0 6 -1 5 0 3 2 3 0

AT 35 3 19 8 11 1 7 0 1 -2

PL 67 -2 10 1 3 1 3 1 4 2

PT 12 -21 9 -15 6 2 6 2 7 2

RO 6 2 9 0 7 0 17 0 6 2

SI 58 4 11 3 5 0 12 1 1 -2

SK 39 -7 8 -5 4 2 13 -1 5 2

FI 54 -3 11 -1 3 0 18 7 4 -1

SE 32 -1 6 2 3 -4 5 1 5 0

UK 54 -9 30 -3 4 -1 6 0 7 0



Q4T - Imagine that you feel that your rights enshrined in the Charter are being violated, and you want to complain about it. To

which institution/ body would you turn? Firstly? And then ?



DK/NA

Un médiateur ou un

organisme indépendant en

(NOTRE PAYS)


gouvernementale

(ONG)

Autres (NE PAS

LIRE)



LIRE)

Andere (NICHT

VORLESEN)



(NICHT VORLESEN)

WN/KA



in (UNSER LAND)

An eine

Nichtregierungsorgani

sation (NGO)

NSP/SR

An ombudsman or an


COUNTRY)

A non-governmental

organisation (NGO)

Other (DO NOT

READ OUT)

None/ You would not


OUT)

T12


%

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 24 -1 39 -1 20 2 15 0 2 0 63 -2 35 2

BE 19 1 44 -2 17 0 19 2 1 -1 63 -1 36 2

BG 32 -1 40 -3 18 2 6 1 4 1 72 -4 24 3

CZ 14 -6 41 -2 22 1 21 6 2 1 55 -8 43 7

DK 30 -5 42 8 16 -1 8 -4 4 2 72 3 24 -5

DE 27 2 33 -4 24 3 13 -1 3 0 60 -2 37 2

EE 14 -1 35 -5 29 2 20 5 2 -1 49 -6 49 7

IE 42 -6 35 -3 13 6 9 4 1 -1 77 -9 22 10

EL 28 -5 43 6 14 4 14 -5 1 0 71 1 28 -1

ES 27 2 35 -3 17 -2 19 3 2 0 62 -1 36 1

FR 17 -2 50 2 15 1 16 -2 2 1 67 0 31 -1

HR 41 32 11 13 3 73 24

IT 33 2 34 0 16 -2 14 1 3 -1 67 2 30 -1

CY 56 -8 25 2 9 5 9 3 1 -2 81 -6 18 8

LV 24 -4 43 -1 23 3 8 1 2 1 67 -5 31 4

LT 32 -5 36 -4 13 2 15 5 4 2 68 -9 28 7

LU 24 -2 51 0 13 1 11 2 1 -1 75 -2 24 3

HU 24 -6 36 3 29 9 9 -3 2 -3 60 -3 38 6

MT 49 -10 33 10 8 -3 7 2 3 1 82 0 15 -1

NL 19 1 45 -1 21 -2 14 2 1 0 64 0 35 0

AT 31 -1 41 3 17 0 10 -2 1 0 72 2 27 -2

PL 16 -8 41 -3 27 7 13 2 3 2 57 -11 40 9

PT 19 -3 45 -6 16 3 17 4 3 2 64 -9 33 7

RO 32 -2 42 2 15 0 7 -1 4 1 74 0 22 -1

SI 35 -3 31 -1 22 4 11 1 1 -1 66 -4 33 5

SK 25 -3 37 -6 21 3 14 5 3 1 62 -9 35 8

FI 9 -5 40 -5 31 7 17 2 3 1 49 -10 48 9

SE 23 2 42 -2 19 0 15 0 1 0 65 0 34 0

UK 17 -3 35 -3 23 2 23 3 2 1 52 -6 46 5

Total

'Intéressé'

Total

'Interested'

Total

'Intéressé'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Total 'Not

interested'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Pas du tout

intéressé (e)

Not at all

interested

Überhaupt

nicht

interessiert

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Très intéressé

(e)

Very

interested

Sehr

interessiert

Plutôt

intéressé (e)

Fairly

interested

Ziemlich

interessiert

Plutôt pas

intéressé (e)

Not very

interested

Nicht sehr

interessiert

Q5.1 Pour chacun des aspects suivants liés à la Charte, seriez-vous intéressés ou non d’avoir plus d’informations à ce

sujet ? Vers qui se tourner si vos droits consacrés dans la Charte sont violés (par exemple une cour compétente ou un organisme

qui puisse gérer les plaintes)

Q5.1 For each of the following aspects related to the Charter, would you be interested or not to have more information

about it? Where to turn if your rights, as enshrined in the Charter, are violated (for example, a competent court or a body which can

handle complaints)

Q5.1 Wie interessiert wären Sie daran, zu jedem der folgenden Aspekte der Charta weitere Informationen zu erhalten?

An wen Sie sich wenden können, falls Ihre in der Charta verankerten Rechte verletzt werden (z.B. Informationen über das

zuständige Gericht oder Organ, das solche Beschwerden behandelt)

T13


%

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 24 -1 40 -1 19 1 15 0 2 1 64 -2 34 1

BE 19 -2 44 -1 18 2 19 2 0 -1 63 -3 37 4

BG 30 -2 43 -1 19 0 6 2 2 1 73 -3 25 2

CZ 13 -3 42 -4 24 2 20 5 1 0 55 -7 44 7

DK 27 -2 46 10 17 -4 7 -6 3 2 73 8 24 -10

DE 30 1 40 2 18 -1 10 -2 2 0 70 3 28 -3

EE 16 -1 35 -4 27 0 20 6 2 -1 51 -5 47 6

IE 40 -5 37 -3 13 5 10 4 0 -1 77 -8 23 9

EL 33 0 42 6 14 4 10 -11 1 1 75 6 24 -7

ES 26 5 34 -5 20 -2 18 1 2 1 60 0 38 -1

FR 19 1 46 -1 15 2 19 -2 1 0 65 0 34 0

HR 37 36 13 12 2 73 25

IT 32 2 37 1 14 -3 15 2 2 -2 69 3 29 -1

CY 51 -10 30 6 9 3 10 3 0 -2 81 -4 19 6

LV 20 -1 45 -3 25 2 9 2 1 0 65 -4 34 4

LT 26 -2 43 -6 13 1 15 6 3 1 69 -8 28 7

LU 25 -2 49 1 13 2 13 1 0 -2 74 -1 26 3

HU 24 -6 40 9 26 3 9 -3 1 -3 64 3 35 0

MT 47 -8 32 5 13 3 5 -1 3 1 79 -3 18 2

NL 14 -4 49 -2 23 2 13 4 1 0 63 -6 36 6

AT 37 4 40 -1 15 0 8 -2 0 -1 77 3 23 -2

PL 17 -8 43 -3 26 7 13 3 1 1 60 -11 39 10

PT 16 -5 48 -1 16 3 17 1 3 2 64 -6 33 4

RO 30 -1 44 0 16 0 7 -1 3 2 74 -1 23 -1

SI 30 -2 30 -7 27 8 12 1 1 0 60 -9 39 9

SK 20 -5 40 -7 25 7 13 4 2 1 60 -12 38 11

FI 12 1 42 -3 28 1 17 1 1 0 54 -2 45 2

SE 21 1 45 1 18 -2 15 0 1 0 66 2 33 -2

UK 18 -1 34 -6 22 2 25 5 1 0 52 -7 47 7

Total

'Intéressé'

Total

'Interested'

Total

'Intéressé'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Total 'Not

interested'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Pas du tout

intéressé (e)

Not at all

interested

Überhaupt

nicht

interessiert

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Très intéressé

(e)

Very

interested

Sehr

interessiert

Plutôt

intéressé (e)

Fairly

interested

Ziemlich

interessiert

Plutôt pas

intéressé (e)

Not very

interested

Nicht sehr

interessiert


sujet ?

Le contenu de la Charte définissant vos droits fondamentaux en tant que citoyen de l’UE


about it?

The content of the Charter, defining your fundamental rights as an EU citizen


Inhalt der Charta: Ihre Grundrechte als EU-Bürger

T14


%

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 20 0 40 0 21 0 17 0 2 0 60 0 38 0

BE 14 -1 43 -1 18 -4 23 5 2 1 57 -2 41 1

BG 29 1 39 -2 19 -4 9 3 4 2 68 -1 28 -1

CZ 13 -1 41 -2 21 -3 24 6 1 0 54 -3 45 3

DK 24 -2 42 4 21 0 10 -4 3 2 66 2 31 -4

DE 20 0 40 4 23 -1 14 -3 3 0 60 4 37 -4

EE 12 -2 36 0 27 -3 22 6 3 -1 48 -2 49 3

IE 34 -7 43 2 13 4 10 2 0 -1 77 -5 23 6

EL 29 2 41 3 15 3 14 -8 1 0 70 5 29 -5

ES 23 5 33 -3 19 -5 22 2 3 1 56 2 41 -3

FR 15 -1 48 0 16 3 19 -3 2 1 63 -1 35 0

HR 34 35 13 16 2 69 29

IT 25 1 36 0 19 -3 18 5 2 -3 61 1 37 2

CY 49 -7 30 3 9 5 11 2 1 -3 79 -4 20 7

LV 14 -3 47 -3 27 4 10 1 2 1 61 -6 37 5

LT 20 -4 42 -7 16 2 19 7 3 2 62 -11 35 9

LU 18 -5 52 8 13 -4 15 0 2 1 70 3 28 -4

HU 18 -9 40 6 30 9 11 -3 1 -3 58 -3 41 6

MT 41 -9 33 4 15 1 6 1 5 3 74 -5 21 2

NL 14 -1 48 0 22 -3 14 3 2 1 62 -1 36 0

AT 26 2 41 -1 20 1 12 -1 1 -1 67 1 32 0

PL 14 -8 42 0 26 3 16 5 2 0 56 -8 42 8

PT 11 -7 47 -3 19 5 20 4 3 1 58 -10 39 9

RO 28 -1 41 -2 20 3 8 -1 3 1 69 -3 28 2

SI 30 4 28 -7 26 3 14 0 2 0 58 -3 40 3

SK 16 -6 37 -6 27 3 17 8 3 1 53 -12 44 11

FI 8 0 38 -2 31 1 20 0 3 1 46 -2 51 1

SE 18 1 42 1 22 0 17 -2 1 0 60 2 39 -2

UK 15 -2 35 -4 23 2 25 3 2 1 50 -6 48 5

Total

'Intéressé'

Total

'Interested'

Total

'Intéressé'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Total 'Not

interested'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Pas du tout

intéressé (e)

Not at all

interested

Überhaupt

nicht

interessiert

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Très intéressé

(e)

Very

interested

Sehr

interessiert

Plutôt

intéressé (e)

Fairly

interested

Ziemlich

interessiert

Plutôt pas

intéressé (e)

Not very

interested

Nicht sehr

interessiert


sujet ?

Quand la Charte s’applique ou non


about it?

When the Charter applies and when it does not


In welchen Fällen die Charta Anwendung findet und in welchen nicht

T15


%

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

Flash

EB

416

Diff.

Flash

EB

340

EU 28 12 0 31 -2 31 0 24 2 2 0 43 -2 55 2

BE 9 -1 29 2 28 -2 32 0 2 1 38 1 60 -2

BG 12 0 37 0 34 -1 14 0 3 1 49 0 48 -1

CZ 6 0 28 -4 33 -1 32 5 1 0 34 -4 65 4

DK 8 -1 22 0 43 9 25 -8 2 0 30 -1 68 1

DE 15 1 27 -1 36 1 19 -1 3 0 42 0 55 0

EE 6 -1 21 -6 39 -1 32 9 2 -1 27 -7 71 8

IE 18 -6 36 -1 27 4 18 3 1 0 54 -7 45 7

EL 18 3 35 1 28 6 18 -10 1 0 53 4 46 -4

ES 13 0 28 -2 29 -4 27 5 3 1 41 -2 56 1

FR 11 2 37 -1 23 0 28 -1 1 0 48 1 51 -1

HR 17 31 27 24 1 48 51

IT 17 1 33 -2 26 -1 22 4 2 -2 50 -1 48 3

CY 29 -12 27 4 23 6 20 4 1 -2 56 -8 43 10

LV 6 -1 33 -4 40 2 20 3 1 0 39 -5 60 5

LT 10 -3 38 -4 22 -1 27 6 3 2 48 -7 49 5

LU 8 -5 42 -2 29 1 20 7 1 -1 50 -7 49 8

HU 10 -5 29 2 43 10 16 -4 2 -3 39 -3 59 6

MT 21 -3 32 4 28 -4 16 2 3 1 53 1 44 -2

NL 7 1 34 1 32 -4 26 2 1 0 41 2 58 -2

AT 14 -1 30 2 34 0 21 -1 1 0 44 1 55 -1

PL 6 -4 34 -5 35 1 23 7 2 1 40 -9 58 8

PT 8 -2 37 -6 27 4 25 2 3 2 45 -8 52 6

RO 18 -2 39 0 27 0 13 0 3 2 57 -2 40 0

SI 13 3 20 -5 37 2 29 1 1 -1 33 -2 66 3

SK 8 -5 27 -4 35 -3 26 9 4 3 35 -9 61 6

FI 6 2 19 -4 42 0 31 1 2 1 25 -2 73 1

SE 9 3 35 4 30 -3 25 -4 1 0 44 7 55 -7

UK 10 1 27 -5 29 0 33 4 1 0 37 -4 62 4

Total

'Intéressé'

Total

'Interested'

Total

'Intéressé'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Total 'Not

interested'

Total 'Pas

intéressé'

Pas du tout

intéressé (e)

Not at all

interested

Überhaupt

nicht

interessiert

NSP/SR

DK/NA

WN/KA

Très intéressé

(e)

Very

interested

Sehr

interessiert

Plutôt

intéressé (e)

Fairly

interested

Ziemlich

interessiert

Plutôt pas

intéressé (e)

Not very

interested

Nicht sehr

interessiert


sujet ?

Le contexte historique et politique de la Charte (quand elle a été adoptée, par qui, etc.)


about it?

The historical and political context of the Charter (when it has been adopted, by whom, etc.)


Geschichte und politischer Kontext der Charta: wann diese verabschiedet wurde, von wem etc.

T16

the charter of fundamental rights of the european...

Documents