europeans’ attitudes towards climate...

SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 313 Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change

1

Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change

Spe

cial

Eur

obar

omet

er 3

13 /

Wav

e 71

.1 –

TN

S O

pini

on &

Soc

ial

Report

Fieldwork: January - February 2009

Publication: July 2009

Special Eurobarometer 313

This survey was requested by the European Commission and the European Parliament and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication of the European Commission. This document does not represent the European Commission's or the European Parliament’s point of view. The interpretations and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT


2

TABLE OF CONTENT

INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 3

1. PERCEPTIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND GLOBAL WARMING ................................ 6

1.1 The three most serious problems facing the world.............................................6

1.2 Assessing the seriousness of the issue........................................................... 16

2. LEVEL OF INFORMATION ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE.......................................... 19

3. COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE................................................................... 25

3.1 Attitudes towards climate change and ways of fighting it.................................. 25

3.1.1 Alternative fuels....................................................................................... 27

3.1.2 Personal action taken to fight climate change ............................................... 29

3.1.3 Impact on the European economy .............................................................. 32

3.1.4 Climate change is not an unstoppable process .............................................. 35

3.1.5 Impact of CO emissions on climate change .................................................. 38

3.1.6 The “seriousness” of climate change has not been exaggerated ...................... 41

CONCLUSION.............................................................................................. 45

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS..................................................................... 47

QUESTIONNAIRE........................................................................................ 49

TABLES …………………………………………………………………………………………….54


3

INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a survey on Europeans' attitudes towards climate change which was carried out in January and February 2009. Over the past years, climate change has gained top priority on international political agendas. The European Union is committed to working constructively towards a global agreement to control climate change, and is leading the way by taking ambitious action of its own.1 In December 2008, the EU adopted an integrated package of legislative measures on energy and climate to implement ambitious targets for 2020 set by EU leaders in March 2007. The targets are aimed at building a sustainable future through cutting greenhouse gases, reducing energy consumption through increased energy efficiency and meeting more of our energy needs from renewable sources. The issue of climate change has not only raised concern at the political top levels. Intense (international) media attention has fostered a lively public debate. It is in this light that this Eurobarometer survey has been conducted, with the overarching aim of exploring European citizens’ attitudes towards climate change. The survey focuses on:

Citizens’ perceptions of climate change in relation to other world problems.

Citizens’ perceptions of the seriousness of climate change.

The extent to which citizens feel informed about climate change – its causes, consequences and ways of fighting it.

Citizens' attitudes towards alternative fuels and CO² emissions.

Whether citizens feel that climate change is stoppable or has been

exaggerated, and what impact it has on the European economy.

Whether citizens have taken personal action to fight climate change.

This Eurobarometer survey was commissioned by the Directorate General for Communication of the European Commission, on behalf of the European Parliament and the European Commission. It was carried out by TNS Opinion & Social network between 16 January and 22 February 2009. The interviews were conducted among 26,718 citizens in the 27 Member States of the European Union, the three candidate countries for accession to the European Union (Croatia, Turkey and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) and in the Turkish Cypriot Community.

1 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/home_en.htm


4

The methodology used is that of Eurobarometer surveys as carried out by the Directorate General for Communication (“Research and Political Analysis” Unit)2 of the European Commission. A technical note on the manner in which interviews were conducted by the Institutes within the TNS Opinion & Social network is appended as an annex to this report. This note indicates the interview methods and the confidence intervals3. The findings of this survey are in the first place analysed at EU level and secondly by country. Where applicable, different socio-demographic variables - such as respondents’ gender, age, education, occupation and political orientation - have been used to take the analysis further. In addition, the following key variables were used in the analysis to gain deeper insight in citizens’ views on climate change:

Respondents’ subjective level of information about the causes and consequences of climate change and the ways of fighting it: QE3: "Personally, do you think that you are well informed or not about…? The different causes of climate change; the different consequences of climate change; Ways in which we can fight climate change."

Their perception of the seriousness of climate change: QE2: "How

serious a problem do you think climate change is at this moment? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, 1 would mean that it is not a serious problem at all and 10 would mean that it is extremely serious."

2 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm 3 The results tables are included in the annex. It should be noted that the total of the percentages in the tables of this report may exceed 100% when the respondent can give several answers to the same question.


5

In this report, the countries are represented by their official abbreviations. The abbreviations used in this report correspond to:

ABBREVIATIONS

EU27 European Union – 27 Member States DK/NA Don’t know / No answer BE Belgium BG Bulgaria CZ Czech Republic DK Denmark D-E East Germany DE Germany D-W West Germany EE Estonia EL Greece ES Spain FR France IE Ireland IT Italy CY Republic of Cyprus*

CY (tcc) Area not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus

LT Lithuania LV Latvia LU Luxembourg HU Hungary MT Malta NL The Netherlands AT Austria PL Poland PT Portugal RO Romania SI Slovenia SK Slovakia FI Finland SE Sweden UK The United Kingdom HR Croatia TR Turkey MK The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia**

*Cyprus as a whole is one of the 27 European Union Member States. However, the “acquis communautaire” is suspended in the part of the country that is not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus. For practical reasons, only the interviews conducted in the part of the country controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus are recorded in the category “CY” and included in the EU27 average. The interviews conducted in the part of the country not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus are recorded in the category “CY(tcc)” [tcc: Turkish Cypriot Community]. ** Provisional code which does not prejudge in any way the definitive nomenclature for this country, which will be agreed following the conclusion of negotiations currently taking place at the United Nations.


6

1. Perceptions of climate change and global warming 1.1 The three most serious problems facing the world

- Poverty, a global economic downturn and climate change are considered the most serious problems in the world-

When looking at the total aggregate of respondents’ answers4 to what they consider to be the most serious problems5, 66% think that “poverty, the lack of food and drinking water” is one of the most serious problems our world faces now. Ranking second is “a major global economic downturn” which more than doubled in mentions (from 24% in spring 2008 to 52% in January-February 2009). The increased mentions for “a major global economic downturn” have resulted in lower mentions for “climate change” which received 62% of mentions in spring 2008. Now “climate change”, with 50% feeling that it is amongst the most serious problems our world faces, ranks third. While the economic crisis dominates over “climate change” and the latter receives lower mentions compared to previous levels, it is important to note that these three problems (poverty, the economy and climate change) receive the highest mentions by at least half the sample. After these three problems, respondents consider “international terrorism” as a serious problem (42%), though in this instance the mentions have also decreased (from 53% in spring 2008). Ranking fifth is “armed conflicts”, mentioned by 39% of respondents. Around a fifth of respondents consider “the proliferation of nuclear weapons” (19%, down from 23% in spring 2008), “the increasing world population” (19%, stable from spring 2008) and “the spread of infectious disease” (18%, down from 23% in spring 2008) as the most serious problems facing the world. Again, it is noted that the increased mentions regarding the seriousness of the economic downturn has resulted in lower mentions for other world problems. The graph overleaf shows the overview:

4 This analysis is based on all answers given by the respondents (i.e. first and other answers) 5 QE1 In your opinion, which of the following do you consider to be the most serious problem currently facing the world as a whole? Firstly? Any others?


7

In your opinion, which of the following do you consider to be the most serious problem currently facing the world as a whole?

Firstly? Any others? - % EU

67%

24%

62%

53%

38%

22%18%

24%

66%

52% 50%

42%39%

19% 19% 18%

Pove

rty,

lack

of foo

d a

nd

drinki

ng

wat

er

A m

ajor

glo

bal

econ

omic

dow

ntu

rn

Clim

ate

chan

ge

Inte

rnat

ional

terr

oris

m

Arm

edco

nfli

cts

The

pro

lifer

atio

nof

nucl

ear

wea

pon

s

The

incr

easi

ng

wor

ldpop

ula

tion

The

spre

adof

an

infe

ctio

us

dis

ease

EB69 EB71

Considering only respondents’ first answer makes “poverty, lack of food and drinking water” top the list of serious problems in the world. This is in line with the previous measurement. However, there is a significant increase in respondents feeling “a major global economic downturn” is the most important problem the world currently faces, up from 5% in spring 2008 to 22% in January-February 2009. This has led to a decrease in the first mention of “climate change” though the issue is still mentioned by close to one in five respondents.


8

18%

22%

30%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Climate change

A major global economic downturn

Poverty, lack of food and drinking water

QE1a In your opinion, which of the following do you consider to be the most serious problem currently facing the world as a whole? Firstly?

% EU

+1

+17

-12

Portuguese and Croat respondents are particularly likely to think that “poverty, lack of food and drinking water” is the most important problem that our world currently faces. “Climate change” is mentioned as the most important problem (first mention) by two countries – Austria and Sweden, with the Swedes again confirming their high sensitivity to environmental topics. At a country level “climate change” is seen as a serious problem especially by citizens of Sweden (82%), Cyprus (76%) and Greece (71%). In addition, those in Sweden, Malta and the Cypriot Community mention “climate change” as being the most serious problem facing the world today. This issue receives lower mentions in Poland (33%), the Czech Republic (33%), Turkey (32%) and Portugal (30%). The graph overleaf illustrates the respective country results.

+ and – indicate evolution from EB69 Spr. 2008


9

“Poverty and the lack of food and drinking water” is considered the most serious problem facing the world in most of the countries polled, especially by the French, Cypriots, Swedes and Croats. Many of the remaining countries cited “a major economic downturn” as the most serious issue facing the world today, with particularly higher mentions in Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovenia and Slovakia. “International terrorism” receives the highest mentions in Bulgaria and Malta, while “armed conflicts” is also being mentioned by more than half of Bulgarians, Estonians, Spanish and Cypriots. “The proliferation of nuclear weapons” is mainly mentioned by citizens of Greece and Cyprus, “the increasing world population” especially by Finland and the Netherlands and “the spread of infectious diseases” by respondents from Ireland and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.


10

Poverty, lack of

food and drinking

water


Climate changeInternational

terrorismArmed conflicts

The proliferation of nuclear weapons

The increasing

world population

The spread of an infectious disease

EU27 66% 52% 50% 42% 39% 19% 19% 18%

BE 69% 54% 54% 37% 34% 21% 22% 15%

BG 62% 71% 43% 50% 52% 18% 9% 14%

CZ 45% 69% 33% 42% 38% 19% 11% 24%

DK 71% 61% 64% 45% 43% 16% 22% 15%

DE 75% 54% 65% 46% 39% 23% 31% 19%

EE 56% 65% 37% 33% 54% 13% 20% 22%

EL 72% 68% 71% 39% 42% 32% 12% 12%

ES 73% 50% 44% 49% 51% 19% 9% 11%

FR 80% 44% 51% 34% 35% 24% 26% 18%

IE 59% 67% 58% 36% 28% 19% 21% 28%

IT 56% 43% 41% 48% 34% 21% 8% 23%

CY 81% 55% 76% 33% 51% 30% 25% 19%

LV 60% 69% 43% 29% 46% 9% 9% 25%

LT 51% 76% 47% 35% 44% 20% 8% 18%

LU 76% 45% 54% 42% 33% 25% 30% 21%

HU 73% 67% 61% 27% 30% 16% 28% 27%

MT 52% 53% 61% 50% 22% 15% 9% 26%

NL 75% 58% 57% 31% 42% 14% 32% 16%

AT 67% 41% 63% 47% 42% 29% 28% 22%

PL 58% 42% 33% 42% 43% 15% 5% 19%

PT 77% 52% 30% 32% 41% 13% 10% 22%

RO 57% 66% 51% 41% 39% 14% 7% 21%

SI 76% 73% 61% 34% 34% 15% 18% 16%

SK 61% 70% 53% 47% 49% 16% 17% 22%

FI 70% 57% 67% 29% 35% 19% 33% 22%

SE 82% 33% 82% 25% 41% 21% 40% 26%

UK 49% 55% 46% 45% 33% 13% 27% 14%

CY (tcc) 42% 51% 61% 36% 30% 20% 17% 11%

HR 81% 50% 46% 39% 43% 14% 6% 17%

TR 51% 41% 32% 40% 30% 21% 15% 7%

MK 69% 47% 42% 38% 35% 14% 3% 28%

QE1T Which do you consider to be the most serious problems currently facing the world as a whole? Firstly? Any others?

Highest percentage by country Highest percentage by item


11

We turn our analysis now to a comparison of the results on a country level in January – February 2009, with that recorded in spring 2008. Countries showing the largest increase in mentions for “poverty, lack of food and drinking water” compared to spring 2008 are Latvia (51% to 60%) and Lithuania (42% to 51%). In contrast, Greece and Turkey show the greatest decreases in mentions for this problem (Greece: 86% down to 72% and Turkey: 63% to 51%).

In your opinion, which of the following do you consider to be the most serious problem currently facing the world as a whole - % EU

66%

82%

81%

80%

77%

76%

76%

75%

75%

73%

73%

72%

71%

70%

69%

67%

62%

61%

60%

59%

58%

57%

56%

56%

52%

51%

49%

45%

42%

81%

69%

51%

EU27

SE

CY

FR

PT

LU

SI

DE

NL

ES

HU

EL

DK

FI

BE

AT

BG

SK

LV

IE

PL

RO

EE

IT

MT

LT

UK

CZ

CY (tcc)

HR

MK

TR



-1

-12

0

-13

-2

-8

-6

-3

+9

-3

+2

-1

+1

+8

-3

+4

+6

-5

+1

+8

-4

+2

-4

+4

-7

+1

-2

-4

+4

0

-11

-2


12

On the aspect of “a major global economic downturn” being the most serious problem facing the world, all European countries show an increase in mentions for this problem. Overall, 52% of European citizens mention this aspect, an increase of 28% from the last measurement. In particular, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, the Netherlands and Slovenia show increases of at least 46% since the previous measurement.


52%

76%

73%

71%

70%

69%

69%

68%

67%

67%

66%

65%

61%

58%

57%

55%

55%

54%

54%

53%

52%

50%

45%

44%

43%

42%

41%

33%

51%

50%

47%

41%

EU27

LT

SI

BG

SK

LV

CZ

EL

HU

IE

RO

EE

DK

NL

FI

CY

UK

DE

BE

MT

PT

ES

LU

FR

IT

PL

AT

SE

CY (tcc)

HR

MK

TR


+28

+25

+35

+41

+45

+24

+20

+11

+33

+18

+26

+16

+22

+27

+29

+19

+27

+24

+30

+38

+30

+46

+40

+21

+30

+30

+53

+40

+46

+44

+46

+40

+ and – indicate evo lution from EB69 Spr. 2008


13

Sweden’s sensitivity towards climate change, as reported in other Eurobarometer surveys, continues here. They are the only country showing an increase in mentions for climate change since the previous survey (80% in spring 2008 to 82% in January-February 2009). Climate change is now mentioned, by those in Sweden, on par with “poverty and lack of food and drinking water” as being a serious problem. In addition, Sweden shows the least mention of “a major economic downturn” being a serious problem facing the world, thereby further posting results in contrast to the other European countries.


50%

82%

76%

71%

67%

65%

64%

63%

61%

61%

61%

58%

57%

54%

54%

53%

51%

51%

47%

46%

44%

43%

43%

41%

37%

33%

33%

30%

61%

46%

42%

32%

EU27

SE

CY

EL

FI

DE

DK

AT

SI

HU

MT

IE

NL

BE

LU

SK

RO

FR

LT

UK

ES

BG

LV

IT

EE

CZ

PL

PT

CY (tcc)

HR

MK

TR

Climate change

-12

-26

-4

-6

-11

-4

-25

-17

-13

+8

-9

-15

-19

-23

-9

-23

-14

-16

-7

-16

-11

-5

-11

-9

-18

-8

-10

-9

-7

-19

-18

+2



14

Socio-demographic analysis We now return to the analysis of all answers given by the respondents (first and other answers). When taking into account different socio-demographic variables it appears that:

“Poverty and lack of food and drinking water” is seen as the most serious problem by men and women, though women show higher mentions on this issue than men (68% versus 64%). In addition, women are more likely to mention “the spread of infectious disease”. In their turn, men are more likely to mention “a major economic downturn” and “the increasing world population” as one of the most serious problems.

Older respondents (aged 55+) are less likely to mention “climate change”

as a serious problem (44%) compared to all the other younger age groups. The middle age groups (25-54) are more likely to mention “a major global economic downturn” (age 25-39: 54%, age 40-54: 52%) showing similar sensitivity to the current economic climate as the youngest (age 15-24: 55%) but more than the oldest (age 55+: 44%) age groups.

Respondents who studied until they reached the age of 20 or beyond are considerably more likely to find poverty, climate change and the increasing world population serious problems than those who finished their studies at the age of 19 or before. International terrorism and the spread of an infectious disease, however, are more frequently mentioned by those who finished their studies earlier.

Those who position themselves at the left end of the political scale appear to mention “climate change”, “poverty” and “armed conflicts” considerably more often than respondents at the right end of the scale. On the other hand, “international terrorism” and “a major economic downturn” is cited more often by respondents on the right side of the political spectrum than by those on the left.

“Climate change” is mentioned most frequently by managers and students and, conversely, the least by house persons and retired people The issue of “climate change” appears to be the second or third most important problem across all socio-demographic categories, thus reflecting its importance across the citizens surveyed.


15

EU27

Sex

Male

Female

Age

15-24

25-39

40-54

55 +

Education (End of)

15-

16-19

20+

Still studying

Self-employed

Managers

Other white collars

Manual workers

House persons

Unemployed

Retired

Students

Left-Right scale

(1-4) Left

(5-6) Centre

(7-10) Right

Respondent occupation scale

55%

54%

47%

62%

72%

69%

67%

56%

57%

48%

63%

65%

68%

66%

55%

54%

52%

68%



Climate change

64% 54%

44%

49%

54%

51% 50%

67%

64%

45%

55%

51%

66% 52% 50%

48%

42%

49%

57%

61%

66%

62%

51%

54%

55%

70%

63%

66%

68%

67%

65%

67%

57%

58%

58%

54%

46%

52%

48%

48%

50%

59%

51%

50%

46%

51%

45%

61%

Which do you consider to be the most serious problems currently facing the world as a whole?

The extent to which respondents feel informed about certain topics related to climate change, i.e. their subjective level of information, appears to be of crucial influence on their perception of “climate change” (for more information about respondents’ self-perceived levels of information about the topic, see chapter 2). Those who say that they feel informed about the issue are significantly more inclined to think that “climate change” is one of the most serious problems our world faces today.

Poverty, lack of food and

drinking water


Climate change

EU27 66% 52% 50%Causes of climate changeInformed 67% 54% 58%Not informed 65% 51% 42%Consequences of climate changeInformed 67% 54% 58%Not informed 65% 51% 42%Ways to fight climate changeInformed 67% 54% 57%Not informed 66% 51% 45%

Which do you consider to be the most serious problems currently facing the world as a whole?


16

1.2 Assessing the seriousness of the issue - Despite the overshadowing economic crisis, a vast majority of Europeans

think that climate change is a very serious issue - The respondents were invited to assess the level of seriousness of climate change on a scale from 1 to 10. More than two-thirds of Europeans think that “climate change” is a very serious problem (67%), while 20% find it a fairly serious problem and 10% do not think it is a serious problem6. In line with the lower mentions of climate change being a serious problem facing the world, there is a decline in the number of Europeans who classify “climate change” as “a very serious problem” (75% in spring 2008 to 67% in January-February 2009). Therefore, it is again likely that the perceived seriousness of the economic downturn has led to a decline in the level of concern for climate change.

Greeks and Cypriots are particularly likely to feel that climate change is a very serious problem, with more than nine in ten respondents expressing this. Results are also well above the EU average in Slovenia, Hungary and France, where more than eight in ten respondents find this issue very serious. The proportions of citizens holding the opposite opinion i.e. that climate change is not a very serious issue, reach their highest levels in the United Kingdom and Estonia. More than 15% of citizens in these countries say that they do not think that climate change is a serious problem.

6 A score between 7 and 10 is categorised as “very serious”, between 5 and 6 “fairly serious” and between 1 and 4 “not a

serious problem”


17

QE2T How serious a problem do you think climate change is at this moment?

6 2 %

6 7 %

7 3 %

7 6 %

4 9 %

5 1%

5 6 %

5 7 %

6 1%

6 3 %

6 3 %

6 4 %

6 5 %

6 5 %

6 7 %

6 7 %

6 7 %

6 9 %

6 9 %

7 0 %

7 0 %

7 0 %

7 1%

7 1%

7 2 %

7 5 %

7 9 %

8 1%

8 3 %

8 3 %

9 2 %

9 4 %

2 4 %

16 %

19 %

17 %

3 1%

3 0 %

2 7 %

2 8 %

2 2 %

2 4 %

2 3 %

2 2 %

2 3 %

2 2 %

2 0 %

2 1%

2 2 %

19 %

2 1%

19 %

19 %

17 %

19 %

15 %

19 %

2 0 %

14 %

14 %

13 %

12 %

8 %

9 %

6 %

5 %

18 %

17 %

15 %

14 %

12 %

12 %

13 %

13 %

10 %

10 %

11%

6 %

8 %

10 %

7 %

10 %

9 %

9 %

4 %

4 %

6 %

8 %

5 %

4 %

5 %

6 %

4 %

3 %

3 %

5 %

3 %

9 %

8 %

1%

4 %

1%

1%

10 %

1%

4 %

4 %

4 %

5 %

3 %

3 %

1%

2 %

2 %

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

2 %

2 %

2 %

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

MK

TR

HR

CY (tcc)

EE

UK

LV

NL

PL

LU

AT

DK

IE

LT

UE27

BE

PT

IT

FI

BG

C Z

ES

DE

RO

SE

SK

MT

FR

HU

SI

CY

EL

A very serious problem (7-10) A fairly serious problem (5-6)Not a serious problem (1-4) DK


18

From a socio-demographic point of view, it appears that those who consider “climate change” to be a very serious problem are more often respondents who:

are female are between 15 and 54 years old studied until the age of 16 or longer are students, self employed or white-collar workers are left wing in their political outlook feel informed about the causes and consequences of climate change and the

ways to combat it The group that does not think “climate change” is a serious problem is largely the opposite of the above and respondents are more likely to be:

male age 55+ retired right wing in their political outlook

Not a serious problem

(1-4)

A fairly serious problem

(5-6)

A very serious problem(7-10)

DK

EU27 10% 20% 67% 3%

Male 11% 20% 67% 2%

Female 8% 20% 69% 3%

15-24 9% 19% 70% 2%

25-39 8% 20% 70% 2%

40-54 10% 18% 70% 2%

55 + 11% 21% 64% 4%

15- 11% 22% 63% 4%

16-19 10% 20% 68% 2%

20+ 9% 18% 72% 1%

Still studying 8% 16% 73% 3%

Self-employed 10% 18% 70% 2%

Managers 10% 20% 69% 1%

Other white collars 8% 19% 71% 2%

Manual workers 9% 22% 67% 2%

House persons 8% 20% 69% 3%

Unemployed 9% 21% 67% 3%

Retired 12% 20% 64% 4%

Students 8% 16% 73% 3%

(1-4) Left 10% 17% 72% 1%

(5-6) Centre 10% 23% 66% 1%

(7-10) Right 12% 21% 65% 2%

Left-Right scale

Respondent occupation scale

Education (End of)

QE2 And how serious a problem do you think climate change is at this moment?

Sex

Age


19

2. Level of information about climate change

- More than half of Europeans feel informed about climate change - More than half of Europeans feel very well or fairly well informed about different aspects of climate change; 56% respectively confirm that they are well informed about both the causes and the consequences of climate change, whereas 52% report that they feel very well or fairly well informed about the ways of fighting it. However, for all three aspects of climate change, more than four in ten respondents do not feel very well informed or not at all informed. Just less than one in ten respondents confirm that they are not at all informed. Opinions on the topic are firm as seen through low “don’t know” responses. Compared to the measurement in spring 2008, the results are stable, with no improvement in citizens’ levels of knowledge on an overall level. The results show that there is a correlation between the three different items.

QE3 Personally, do you think that you are well informed or not about…? % EU

8%

8%

8%

48%

48%

44%

34%

33%

37%

8%

9%

9%

2%

2%

2%

The different causes ofclimate change

The differentconsequences of climate

change

Ways in which we canfight climate change

Very well informed Fairly well informed Not very well informed Not at all informed DK

Citizens from Sweden, the Netherlands and Finland feel the best informed about issues related to climate change. At least three-quarters of respondents in those countries feel informed about the causes and the consequences of climate change and at least seven in ten feel knowledgeable about the ways in which climate change can be fought. Citizens in the United Kingdom also appear to feel well informed about ways in which to fight climate change. The lowest levels of (subjective) information can be found among Bulgarians, Romanians, Portuguese and Turkish citizens. In fact more than six in ten respondents in these countries typify themselves as poorly informed about the causes, consequences and ways of fighting climate change.


20

Although results on an overall level are fairly stable, when compared to spring 2008, some changes on a country level are evident: Ireland and Slovenia show increased levels of knowledge for the causes, consequences and ways to fight climate change. For example, the subjective levels of information of the ways to fight climate change have increased from 62% to 69% in Slovenia, and 60% to 67% in Ireland. Greek citizens also show an increase in knowledge levels for the different causes of climate change (from 46% to 55%) and for the different consequences of climate change (from 53% to 58%).

QE3.1 Personally, do you think that you are well informed or not about…?The different causes of climate change - Well informed

27%

51%

49%

43%

34%

36%

33%

36%

43%

37%

43%

47%

43%

51%

51%

46%

50%

46%

54%

60%

55%

66%

59%

70%

64%

66%

80%

73%

75%

82%

88%

25%

46%

49%

44%

30%

31%

31%

38%

41%

42%

42%

44%

45%

46%

49%

50%

51%

55%

55%

58%

58%

60%

66%

66%

68%

72%

73%

73%

77%

80%

87%

56%56%

TR

MK

HR

CY (tcc)

PT

BG

RO

CZ

IT

LT

PL

MT

SK

EE

ES

AT

LV

EL

HU

FR

CY

BE

IE

LU

DE

SI

DK

UK

FI

NL

SE

EU27

EB71.1

EB69.2


21

QE3.2 Personally, do you think that you are well informed or not about…?Ways in which we can fight climate change - Well informed

45%

24%

39%

31%

25%

28%

34%

34%

30%

37%

37%

39%

43%

40%

50%

41%

47%

48%

45%

51%

62%

55%

63%

59%

72%

60%

62%

77%

72%

71%

77%

42%

22%

35%

39%

21%

26%

28%

35%

36%

36%

38%

38%

41%

42%

46%

46%

47%

48%

49%

50%

54%

55%

60%

61%

66%

67%

69%

72%

72%

75%

76%

52%52%

HR

TR

MK

CY (tcc)

BG

RO

PT

CZ

LT

SK

IT

PL

EE

LV

EL

AT

HU

CY

MT

ES

BE

FR

LU

DE

DK

IE

SI

NL

UK

FI

SE

EU27

EB71.1

EB69.2


22

On the other hand, Belgium and Denmark report decreased levels of information, most prominently for the consequences of climate change (66% to 57% for Belgium; 79% to 70% for Denmark). Greek citizens show decreased levels of being informed on the aspect of ways in to fight climate change (50% to 46%).

QE3.2 Personally, do you think that you are well informed or not about…? The different consequences of climate change - Well informed

26%

55%

53%

44%

34%

37%

37%

37%

44%

45%

45%

40%

50%

52%

45%

51%

53%

56%

60%

66%

53%

60%

59%

70%

66%

79%

72%

69%

76%

83%

85%

26%

49%

51%

45%

29%

31%

33%

37%

42%

43%

44%

44%

46%

46%

48%

51%

53%

57%

57%

57%

58%

64%

65%

68%

68%

70%

72%

74%

77%

78%

84%

56%56%

TR

MK

HR

CY (tcc)

PT

RO

BG

CZ

IT

SK

PL

LT

MT

EE

AT

ES

LV

HU

FR

BE

EL

CY

IE

LU

DE

DK

UK

SI

FI

NL

SE

EU27

EB71.1

EB69.2


23

From a socio-demographic point of view, shown in the table, we see that:

Men feel better informed than women about the causes of climate change, its consequences and the ways it could be combated.

The group of older respondents (aged 55+) feels significantly less informed than its younger counterparts about these issues.

The self-perceived level of information among respondents increases with their levels of education.

Managers, students, other white collar workers and those who are self employed feel the best informed about these issues while retired, unemployed people and manual workers feel the least informed.

Respondents’ place of residence has an influence on their subjective information levels; respondents in rural areas more frequently feel poorly informed about climate change than those living in large towns.

People who think that climate change is a very serious problem feel better informed about its different causes and consequences (59% and 60% versus 56% EU27 average ‘well informed’ for both aspects) than those who do not consider it to be a serious problem (54% and 55% versus 56% EU27 average ‘well informed’ for both aspects). Those who regard climate change as a fairly serious problem feel the least informed about all issues related to climate change (its causes, consequences and the ways to fight it; 48% on causes and consequences respectively versus 42% EU27 average ‘badly informed’ for both aspects and 50% versus 46% EU27 average ‘badly informed’ on the aspect of ways in which to fight climate change).

SP

EC

IAL E

UR

OB

AR

OM

ET

ER

31

3

E

uro

pean

s’ a

ttit

ud

es

tow

ard

s cl

imate

ch

an

ge

24

To

tal

"Well

info

rmed

"T

ota

l "B

ad

ly

info

rmed

"D

KT

ota

l "W

ell

info

rmed

"T

ota

l "B

ad

ly

info

rmed

"D

KT

ota

l "W

ell

in

form

ed

"To

tal

"Bad

ly

info

rmed

"D

K

EU

27

56%

42%

2%

56%

42%

2%

52%

46%

2%

Sex

Mal

e59%

39%

2%

59%

39%

2%

55%

43%

2%

Fem

ale

52%

46%

2%

53%

45%

2%

49%

48%

3%

Ag

e

15-2

456%

42%

2%

57%

41%

2%

52%

46%

2%

25-3

958%

40%

2%

58%

40%

2%

54%

43%

3%

40-5

459%

40%

1%

59%

40%

1%

54%

44%

2%

55 +

51%

47%

2%

52%

46%

2%

47%

50%

3%

Ed

uca

tion

(En

d o

f)

15-

41%

56%

3%

41%

57%

2%

38%

59%

3%

16-1

955%

43%

2%

55%

43%

2%

51%

47%

2%

20+

69%

30%

1%

70%

29%

1%

65%

34%

1%

Still

studyi

ng

65%

33%

2%

63%

34%

3%

57%

40%

3%

Left

-Rig

ht

scale

(1-4

) Le

ft62%

37%

1%

62%

37%

1%

57%

42%

1%

(5-6

) Cen

tre

60%

39%

1%

62%

37%

1%

58%

41%

1%

(7-1

0)

Rig

ht

56%

42%

2%

56%

42%

2%

53%

45%

2%

Sel

f-em

plo

yed

59%

39%

2%

59%

38%

3%

56%

41%

3%

Man

ager

s73%

26%

1%

72%

26%

2%

68%

31%

1%

Oth

er w

hite

colla

rs59%

39%

2%

60%

38%

2%

57%

41%

2%

Man

ual

work

ers

54%

44%

2%

55%

43%

2%

50%

48%

2%

House

per

sons

42%

56%

2%

44%

54%

2%

40%

57%

3%

Unem

plo

yed

48%

50%

2%

48%

51%

1%

46%

52%

2%

Ret

ired

51%

47%

2%

51%

47%

2%

47%

50%

3%

Stu

den

ts65%

33%

2%

63%

34%

3%

57%

40%

3%

Perc

ep

tion

of

clim

ate

ch

an

ge

A v

ery

serious

pro

ble

m59%

40%

1%

60%

39%

1%

55%

44%

1%

A f

airly

serious

pro

ble

m50%

48%

2%

50%

48%

2%

48%

50%

2%

Not

a se

rious

pro

ble

m54%

44%

2%

55%

43%

2%

52%

45%

3%

Pers

on

ally,

do

you

th

ink t

hat

yo

u a

re w

ell in

form

ed

or

no

t ab

ou

t…?

Resp

on

den

t o

ccu

pati

on

sca

le

Th

e d

iffe

ren

t co

nse

qu

en

ces

of

clim

ate

ch

an

ge

Ways

in w

hic

h w

e c

an

fig

ht

clim

ate

ch

an

ge

Th

e d

iffe

ren

t ca

use

s o

f cl

imate

ch

an

ge


25

3. Combating climate change

3.1 Attitudes towards climate change and ways of fighting it

- Although climate change is seen as a serious problem, it can be solved - Respondents were invited to give their opinion on a number of statements linked to the problem of climate change.7 Their attitudes can be summarised as follows: the issue of climate change is serious but the process is not unstoppable. Whilst nearly two-thirds of Europeans (65%) do not think that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated, they are nevertheless predominantly optimistic and mostly disagree (58%) with the statement that the process of climate change is unstoppable. However, also just under a third (31%) are rather pessimistic and believe that climate change is an unstoppable process. On the seriousness of climate change, around a quarter (27%) of Europeans think that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated. According to a wide majority of Europeans (75%), alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Belief in alternative fuels has also increased significantly, from 70% in spring 2008. Another measurement showing an encouraging significant increase is the belief that fighting climate change can have a positive effect on the European economy (56% in spring 2008 to 62% in January-February 2009), which is remarkable in the light of the current economic downturn. The share of "don't know answers" is quite high at 17%. As far as the causes of climate change are concerned, the majority of citizens (62%) disagree with the statement that CO2 emissions have only a marginal impact on climate change. Turning to citizens’ personal contribution to the fight against climate change, we see that a clear majority (59%) confirm that they have taken some kind of action on this matter. However, compared to spring 2008, more people state they have not personally taken action aimed at helping to fight climate change (31% in spring 2008 to 34% in January-February 2009). The current economic and financial crisis impacting on the respondents’ lives may play a role in this regard.

7 QE4 For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you totally agree, tend to agree, tend to disagree or totally disagree…? Climate change is an unstoppable process, we cannot do anything about it; The seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated; Emission of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) has only a marginal impact on climate change; Fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European economy; Alternative fuels, such as "bio fuels", should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; You personally have taken actions aimed at helping to fight climate change


26

QE4 For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you totally agree, tend to agree, tend to disagree or totally disagree.

- % EU

75%

62%

59%

31%

30%

27%

15%

21%

34%

62%

58%

65%

AgreeDisagreeDK

Fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European

economy

Alternative fuels, such as "bio fuels", should be used to reduce greenhouse

gas emissions

You personally have taken actions aimed at helping to fight climate change

Climate change is an unstoppable process, we cannot do anything about it

Emission of CO2 has only a marginal impact on climate change

The seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated 8%

12%

7%

7%

17%

10%+5

+6

-2

0

0

+1

-3

-3

+3

+2

+3

0



27

3.1.1 Alternative fuels On average, three quarters of Europeans think that alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gases (75%), 15% disagree with this and 10% say that they do not know. The results at country level are relatively homogenous. Absolute majorities in all countries polled, in fact, agree with this (except for Turkey where 41% agree). The strongest belief in the usage of alternative fuels is found in Greece, Denmark, Slovenia and Slovakia, though in most other countries more than six in ten citizens also feel that fuels of this type should be used to reduce greenhouse gases. The greatest increases in the belief that alternative fuels should be used can be found in Germany (54% in spring 2008 to 68% in January-February 2009), with Bulgaria (72% to 82%) and Lithuania (75% to 84%) also posting large increases. On the other side of the spectrum, as mentioned, are Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot Community where 41% and 58% agree (respectively). However, it should be noted that a third or more of citizens in these two countries feel they are not familiar enough with the topic to give their opinion, as 41% in Turkey and 33% in the Turkish Cypriot Community give “don’t know” in reply to this question. A similar high level of unfamiliarity is found in Malta (33% “don’t know”). Malta and Turkey also show the greatest decrease in the belief in the usage of alternative fuels –64% of Maltese now agree that alternative fuels should be used (compared to 73% in spring 2008) though this is largely due to more Maltese not having an opinion. In Turkey though, belief in alternative fuels have declined from 50% to 41% due to more people disagreeing that alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.


28

The analysis of the results by socio-demographic variables reveals:

Women are more likely than men not to have an opinion about the usage of alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as can be seen in higher “don’t know” levels. This leads to higher proportions of men both agreeing and disagreeing that such fuels should be used for this purpose.

Most inclined to agree that alternative fuels should be used to reduce

greenhouse gas emissions are respondents in the lowest two age groups (aged 15-39 years). Respondents who are 55 years and older are most inclined to disagree with this. They also, more frequently than respondents in other age groups, have no opinion regarding this topic.

Looking at education levels, those who completed their education at the age

of 15 years or younger are more likely to be unfamiliar with the topic (17% “don’t know”), and therefore least likely to “agree” that alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Although more than three-quarters of those who continued their studies to the age of 20 or beyond believe in alternative fuels (76%), they are also more likely to “disagree” that alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (18%). This indicates how better-educated citizens are more likely to have an opinion on the matter.

For various employment categories it is noted that house persons and

retired citizens are more likely to be unfamiliar with the topic.

Respondents who feel informed about the causes and consequences of climate change and the ways to fight it are significantly more likely than those who feel poorly informed about these issues to agree with the statement. This is however clearly due to the much higher rate of “don’t know” replies among respondents in the latter group.

Those who think that climate change is a very serious problem are

considerably more likely to think that alternative fuels should be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than those who feel that climate change is not a serious problem.


29

3.1.2 Personal action taken to fight climate change Close to six in ten Europeans (59%) claim that they have taken personal measures to fight climate change, while just over a third (34%) say they have not. At country level the largest proportion of those who have personally taken action aimed at helping to fight climate change can be found in Sweden (82%). Slovenia and the United Kingdom also show large proportions of people who have taken action. At the other end of the spectrum, in Lithuania, Romania and Latvia only about a third of citizens have taken action aimed at helping to fight climate change. However, it should be noted that more people in Lithuania have personally become involved in fighting climate change when compared to the previous measure (26% in spring 2008 to 34% in January-February 2009). Decreased levels of involvement are reported especially in Cyprus (72% down to 50%), Slovakia (67% down to 51%) and Greece (72% down to 58%) when comparing the results for spring 2008 and January to February 2009. In Romania, Turkey, Bulgaria and the Turkish Cypriot Community, at least one in five citizens can not say whether they have taken actions aimed at helping to fight climate change, which is well above the EU average of 7%.


30

Analysis by socio-demographic variables reveals that:

An increase in respondents’ age increases the likelihood that they have taken personal action. The results for the highest age (age 55+) bracket, however, do not follow this pattern.

“Taking personal action” is significantly more common among respondents

with a longer education (ending at the age of 20+) than among those who ended their educational career at a relatively early age. Those who finished school at 15 or younger are much more inclined to give a “don’t know” reply than respondents in other educational categories.

Actions aimed at helping to fight climate change were more frequently taken

by respondents who position themselves to the left of the political scale than by those who describe themselves as politically “right-wing”.

Among occupational groups, managers most often confirm that they have

personally taken action aimed at helping to fight climate change. Students and unemployed people are most likely to disagree with this. Taking actions to fight climate change can be costly, and this may explain why the categories that act personally are those who have the higher standard of living.

“Taking action” to fight climate change is much more widespread among

respondents who feel well-informed about climate change (its causes, consequences and the ways to fight it) than among those who feel ill- informed about these issues.

Quite logically, those who think that climate change is a very serious

problem are considerably more likely to have taken personal action aimed at fighting climate change than those who do not think it is a serious problem.


31

Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK Agree Disagree

EU27 15% 44% 22% 12% 7% 59% 34%

SexMale 15% 44% 22% 13% 6% 59% 35%Female 16% 44% 22% 11% 7% 60% 33%Age15-24 11% 40% 26% 16% 7% 51% 42%25-39 16% 48% 21% 10% 5% 64% 31%40-54 18% 46% 20% 11% 5% 64% 31%55 + 14% 43% 22% 13% 8% 57% 35%Education (End of)15- 13% 39% 25% 14% 9% 52% 39%16-19 15% 45% 22% 12% 6% 60% 34%20+ 20% 50% 17% 9% 4% 70% 26%Still studying 11% 41% 26% 16% 6% 52% 42%Respondent occupation scaleSelf-employed 15% 50% 20% 8% 7% 65% 28%Managers 20% 54% 16% 7% 3% 74% 23%Other white collars 16% 49% 21% 9% 5% 65% 30%Manual workers 16% 43% 21% 13% 7% 59% 34%House persons 15% 40% 26% 11% 8% 55% 37%Unemployed 15% 39% 24% 16% 6% 54% 40%Retired 14% 42% 22% 14% 8% 56% 36%Students 11% 41% 26% 16% 6% 52% 42%Left-Right scale(1-4) Left 17% 47% 20% 12% 4% 64% 32%(5-6) Centre 17% 48% 20% 10% 5% 65% 30%(7-10) Right 14% 43% 25% 12% 6% 57% 37%

You personally have taken actions aimed at helping to fight climate change

For each of the following statements, please tell me whether you ...


32

3.1.3 Impact on the European economy More than six out of ten Europeans (62%) think that fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European economy, while close to a fifth (21%) disagree and 17% state that they do not know. As mentioned, despite the financial and economic crisis, the measure for the positive impact on the economy has increased significantly from spring 2008 (56%). At country level, more than eight in ten of Cypriot (81%) citizens and more than seven in ten of Greek (74%), Slovak (72%), Swedish (72%) and Danish (71%) respondents think that fighting climate change could have a positive impact on the European economy. However, more than a third of those polled in Latvia (39%) and the Netherlands (35%) disagree. Finland disagrees at 33%. Though some negative perceptions are evident in the Netherlands, it is also noted that this country shows the highest increase in mentions that fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European economy (38% in spring 2008 to 52% in January-February 2009). Other countries showing high increases since spring 2008 include Spain (45% to 55%), the UK (51% to 61%) and Cyprus (72% to 81%). Forty-three percent of Maltese, 41% of Turks and 36% of those in the Turkish Cypriot Community say that they do not know whether fighting climate change would have a positive effect on the European economy. Also, 32% of Spanish and Bulgarian citizens express “don’t know”.


33

Looking at the influence of socio-demographic factors on respondents’ opinions, we see that:

Men are more likely than women to believe that fighting climate change can affect the European economy positively. Women are, also, less likely than men to have an opinion in this respect, seen in high “don’t know” levels.

Looking at the age groupings, older respondents (age 55+) are more likely

to have no opinion on this matter, with one in five (20%) stating they “don’t know”.

Agreement with the statement that fighting climate change has a positive effect on European economy rises along with respondents’ levels of education. This can partially be explained by the high “don’t know” rates among less educated people.

Respondents who classify themselves on the left-hand spectrum of the

political scale are more likely to agree than those on the right (67% vs. 62% respectively).

The highest level of agreement is found among managers. The variations in terms of occupational groupings are clearly linked to the strong differences in the proportions of “don’t know” replies between those groups.

This is also the case for respondents’ subjective level of information. Due

to significant differences in the proportions of "don't know” replies, those who feel well-informed about different aspects of climate change agree to a much stronger extent that the European economy would be affected positively by fighting climate change than those who do not feel well informed about those issues.

For a clear majority of those respondents who consider climate change a

very serious problem, fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European economy (62%), compared to only 44% agreement among respondents who do not think that climate change is a serious problem.


34

Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK Agree Disagree

EU27 17% 45% 16% 5% 17% 62% 21%


Fighting climate change can have a positive impact on the European economy



35

3.1.4 Climate change is not an unstoppable process The majority of Europeans (62%) disagree with the statement that climate change is an unstoppable process, while less than a third do think that there is nothing that can be done about climate change (31%). Another 7% say that they do not know. There are in fact only three countries, Latvia, Poland and Estonia, where no absolute majority of citizens disagrees with the statement. The greatest optimism in this respect, i.e. the highest proportions of respondents disagreeing with the statement, can be found in Sweden, Malta and Greece. In those countries well above seven in ten citizens disagree that climate change is an unstoppable process, while fewer than a quarter hold the opposite opinion. Contrary to low “don’t know” levels in Sweden and Greece, Malta shows 13% “don’t know”. In addition, in Malta, significantly fewer citizens agree that climate change is an unstoppable process (19% in spring 2008 down to 8% in January-February 2009), partly due to higher levels of “don’t know” mentions but also due to greater optimism. The largest proportion of citizens believing that climate change is an unstoppable process exists, conversely, in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the United Kingdom and Poland. Cyprus also shows greater levels of agreement when compared to the previous survey as 31% now believe climate change is unstoppable (compared to 19% in spring 2008). The highest proportion of “don’t know” replies is found in Portugal (20%), Romania (19%) and Turkey (18%).


36

From a socio-demographic perspective, we see that:

Although the levels of disagreement are equal between the two genders,

females are more likely than males to not have an opinion on whether climate change is an unstoppable process.

Respondents in the oldest age group (age 55+) are less likely to feel that climate change can be stopped, compared to the other age groupings. This is due to them being more likely to agree that climate change is an unstoppable process (34%) and having no opinion on the matter (10%).

Levels of disagreement increase with respondents’ educational levels. On the other hand, rates of “don’t know” replies increase with lower educational levels.

Those on the left-hand side of the political spectrum are more likely to

disagree (65%) than those on the right (60%).

Retired and unemployed people most frequently think that climate change is an unstoppable process, while managers, students and other white collar workers are most likely to disagree with this.

Respondents who feel well-informed about the causes and consequences of

climate change and the ways to fight it more frequently disagree with the statement than those who do not feel well informed about these subjects. This can however be explained by the fact that the latter group much more frequently than the former gives a “don’t know” reply.

It is also interesting to observe that those who regard climate change as a

very serious problem seem much more inclined than those holding the opposite view to disagree that this phenomenon is an unstoppable process.


37

Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK Agree Disagree

EU27 7% 24% 37% 25% 7% 31% 62%


Climate change is an unstoppable process, we cannot do anything about it



38

3.1.5 Impact of CO emissions on climate change While the majority of Europeans (58%) disagree that the impact of CO2 emissions on climate change is only marginal, 30% think that CO2 emissions only have a marginal impact and 12% confirm they do not know. Hungarians are most likely to disagree with this statement (76%), though high mentions are also found amongst the Danish, Greeks, Slovenians, Slovaks and Swedish – in all these countries at least seven out of 10 respondents think that CO2 emissions have more than a marginal effect on climate change. Irish, Dutch, Estonian and British respondents are, conversely, particularly convinced that emissions of CO2 only have a marginal impact on climate change. In Ireland, the proportion so believing (50%) is significantly higher than those who disagree (33%), and has also increased significantly since spring 2008 (where 41% agreed that CO2 emissions only have a marginal impact). The majority of Estonians (45%) are also of the opinion that the impact of emissions is only marginal. In the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, opinion appears to be strongly divided. Comparing the results on a country level with spring 2008 shows that, in addition to Ireland, Latvia and Lithuania also post higher levels of the sentiment that CO2 emissions only have a marginal impact on climate change (for Latvia: 31% to 40%; for Lithuania: 23% to 32%). The “don’t know” rates are particularly high in Malta, Turkey (both 37%) and Portugal (32%).


39

Analysis by socio-demographic variables shows that:

The level of agreement with the statement is higher among men than among women, i.e. men are particularly likely to think that CO2 emissions only have a marginal effect on climate change. “Don’t know” rates, however, are higher among women.

The oldest respondents (aged 55+) are not as likely as other respondents to

disagree with the statement that CO2 emissions only have a marginal impact on climate change. This can most probably be explained by the much higher proportions of “don’t know” replies in this age group.

The levels of disagreement increase with respondents’ levels of education.

This should also clearly be put in relation to the strongly increasing proportions of “don’t know” replies, when educational levels fall.

Those to the left of the political spectrum disagree more often than those

on the right that the impact of CO2 emissions on climate change is only marginal.

Managers form the occupational category most likely to disagree that CO2

emissions only have a marginal effect on climate change, with higher answers of “don’t know” amongst house persons and retired respondents.

Respondents who feel well-informed about the causes and consequences of

climate change and the ways to fight it tend to disagree with this more frequently than those who do not feel well informed about these subjects. It needs to be taken into account that the latter group more often give a “don’t know” reply than the former.

Those who consider climate change to be a very serious problem are

significantly more likely to disagree that the impact of CO2 emissions is only marginal, than those who think that climate change is not a serious problem.


40

Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK Agree Disagree

EU27 7% 23% 33% 25% 12% 30% 58%


Emission of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) has only a marginal impact on climate change



41

3.1.6 The “seriousness” of climate change has not been exaggerated Close to two-thirds of Europeans (65%) do not think that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated, while just over a quarter (27%) believes that it has. Climate change is seen to be particularly serious for respondents in Slovenia and Greece. More than eight in ten Slovenian and Greek respondents (83% respectively) say that they do not think that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated. The opposite tendency can be observed in the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom, where around four in ten respondents agree that the seriousness of this phenomenon has been exaggerated. These figures also reach relatively high levels in Estonia (37%), where mentions have increased significantly from 30% in spring 2008. Other countries showing higher mentions of the seriousness being exaggerated include Latvia (18% up to 28%), Poland (18% up to 25%), Estonia (30% up to 37%) and the Czech Republic (22% up to 29%). The proportions of “don’t know” replies are far above the EU average of 8% in Romania (23%) and Portugal (20%).


42

A socio-demographic breakdown reveals that:

Men, more often than women, think that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated.

Disagreement, furthermore, seems to be much more widespread among

respondents that ended their education at the age of 20 or later than among those who finished at a younger age. The share of “don’t know” replies is much bigger in the latter group than in the former.

Those who lean towards the right politically are considerably more likely to

believe that the seriousness of this issue has been exaggerated.

Those who feel well-informed about the causes and consequences of climate change and the ways to fight it are more likely to disagree, compared with those who do not feel well informed about these subjects, though this is due to a larger proportion of the latter having no opinion.

Respondents who consider climate change to be a very serious problem are

significantly more likely to disagree than those who believe that climate change is not a serious problem.


43

Totally agree

Tend to agree

Tend to disagree

Totally disagree

DK Agree Disagree

EU27 6% 21% 34% 31% 8% 27% 65%


The seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated



44

Summarising the socio-demographic results In summary, we see that respondents with a longer education who feel well-informed about climate change (its causes, consequences and the ways of fighting it) or who consider this phenomenon to be a very serious problem are more inclined to believe that climate change is serious, that the process of it can be stopped, that alternative fuels should be used to fight it and that fighting climate change would impact the European economy positively than respondents who spent shorter time within education, rather feel ill-informed about the subject or do not think that climate change is a serious problem. Respondents representing the former groups are also more likely than those in the latter to have taken personal action against climate change or to know that CO2 emissions do not have a merely marginal impact on climate change.


45

CONCLUSION Climate change is still seen as one of the top three most serious problems facing the world today, though the seriousness of this issue (as with many other world problems) has declined in the face of the economic downturn, which dominates public opinion (and perceived concerns). Still, over two-thirds of Europeans feel that climate change is a very serious problem, and that the seriousness of climate change has not been exaggerated. However, Europeans feel that climate change can be stopped and the proportion of those thinking that fighting it can have a positive impact on the economy has increased. Undoubtedly, the fact that most Europeans feel well informed about climate change, its consequences, causes and ways of combating it assists in enabling people to join in the fight. Nevertheless, when asked at taking action a personal level, the proportion of Europeans that claim to personally act to fight climate change has decreased since spring 2008. It is important, however, to note the variances in responses at a country level, especially in light of the fact that to effectively combat climate change a collective effort is required. To this end a trend is noted in Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria and Lithuania – in these countries, specifically, citizens admit to not being well informed about the causes, consequences and ways of combating climate change. This then leads to citizens from these countries either not personally taking action against climate change, or not being able to say whether they are taking any action.. In addition, several countries show a lack of familiarity (through higher “don’t know” levels) regarding the consequences and outcomes regarding climate change, when probed on specifics. For example, Turkey shows high levels of unfamiliarity with climate change’s impact on the European economy, the efficacy of using alternative fuels, whether climate change can be stopped and the impact of CO2 emissions. Malta, the Turkish Cypriot Community, Romania and Portugal also show above average levels of unfamiliarity with more than one of these aspects. On the other side of the spectrum, Sweden, Slovenia, the United Kingdom and Ireland are countries where an above average number of citizens are both well informed about climate change, and personally take action to fight climate change. In Ireland and Slovenia the proportions of citizens who feel well informed about the causes, consequences and ways to fight climate change have increased since spring 2008. Looking further at the perceptions and attitudes regarding climate change, respondents in Sweden, Greece, Denmark and Slovakia state that CO2 emissions have a significant impact on climate change. In addition, all these countries feel that the seriousness of climate change has not been exaggerated, though the process of climate change can be stopped.


46

The Netherlands and the United Kingdom differ from this trend – although they, like the countries mentioned above, feel well informed about climate change, more than four in ten citizens in these countries say that the seriousness of climate change has been exaggerated and CO2 emissions have only a marginal impact on climate change. Hence, there is greater division of opinion in these two countries, which leads to only around half of citizens in the United Kingdom and Netherlands classifying climate change as a “very serious” problem (significantly lower than the European average). In socio-demographic terms, women, those with a shorter education, and older citizens (aged 55+) feel the least informed about climate change. In general, there is a positive correlation between the perceived level of knowledge about climate change, and the perceived seriousness of the issue. It can be concluded that, despite the economic and financial crisis, concerns about climate change have retained their “position” in the public’s mind. Whilst considerable country variations are noted, there is a positive base of informed and active citizens in the fight against climate change.


47

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 16th of January and the 22nd of February 2009, TNS Opinion & Social, a consortium created between Taylor Nelson Sofres and EOS Gallup Europe, carried out wave 71.1 of the EUROBAROMETER, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Communication, “Research and Political Analysis” and the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. The SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°313 is part of wave 71.1 and covers the population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over. The SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER N°313 has also been conducted in the three candidate countries (Croatia, Turkey and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) and in the Turkish Cypriot Community. In these countries, the survey covers the national population of citizens and the population of citizens of all the European Union Member States that are residents in these countries and have a sufficient command of the national languages to answer the questionnaire. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multi-stage, random (probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density. In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units", after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas. In each of the selected sampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, at random (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available.


48

For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a national weighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. For international weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure are listed above. Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits:

Observed percentages 10% or 90% 20% or 80% 30% or 70% 40% or 60% 50%

Confidence limits ± 1.9 points ± 2.5 points ± 2.7 points ± 3.0 points ± 3.1 points

ABBREVIATIONS COUNTRIES INSTITUTES N° INTERVIEWS

FIELDWORK DATES

POPULATION 15+

BE Belgium TNS Dimarso 1.018 22/01/2009 22/02/2009 8.786.805 BG Bulgaria TNS BBSS 1.000 16/01/2009 30/01/2009 6.647.375 CZ Czech Rep. TNS Aisa 1.050 22/01/2009 12/02/2009 8.571.710 DK Denmark TNS Gallup DK 1.016 19/01/2009 18/02/2009 4.432.931 DE Germany TNS Infratest 1.523 17/01/2009 10/02/2009 64.546.096 EE Estonia Emor 1.003 17/01/2009 09/02/2009 887.094 EL Greece TNS ICAP 1.000 21/01/2009 12/02/2009 8.691.304 ES Spain TNS Demoscopia 1.003 20/01/2009 13/02/2009 38.536.844 FR France TNS Sofres 1.035 17/01/2009 11/02/2009 46.425.653 IE Ireland TNS MRBI 1.000 20/01/2009 12/02/2009 3.375.399 IT Italy TNS Infratest 1.060 21/01/2009 06/02/2009 48.892.559 CY Rep. of Cyprus Synovate 504 21/01/2009 15/02/2009 638.900

CY(tcc) Turkish Cypriot Comm.

KADEM 500 24/01/2009 11/02/2009 143.226

LV Latvia TNS Latvia 1.001 23/01/2009 11/02/2009 1.444.884 LT Lithuania TNS Gallup

Lithuania 1.010 22/01/2009 03/02/2009 2.846.756

LU Luxembourg TNS ILReS 504 17/01/2009 13/02/2009 388.914 HU Hungary TNS Hungary 1.023 23/01/2009 13/02/2009 8.320.614 MT Malta MISCO 500 16/01/2009 12/02/2009 335.476 NL Netherlands TNS NIPO 1.044 24/01/2009 21/02/2009 13.017.690 AT Austria Österreichisches

Gallup-Institut 1.000 16/01/2009 09/02/2009 7.004.205

PL Poland TNS OBOP 1.000 25/01/2009 17/02/2009 32.155.805 PT Portugal TNS EUROTESTE 1.000 26/01/2009 13/02/2009 8.080.915 RO Romania TNS CSOP 1.043 16/01/2009 12/02/2009 18.246.731 SI Slovenia RM PLUS 1.008 17/01/2009 13/02/2009 1.729.298 SK Slovakia TNS AISA SK 1.025 20/01/2009 13/02/2009 4.316.438 FI Finland TNS Gallup Oy 1.017 23/01/2009 17/02/2009 4.353.495 SE Sweden TNS GALLUP 1.017 22/01/2009 13/02/2009 7.562.263 UK United

Kingdom TNS UK 1.314 22/01/2009 18/02/2009 50.519.877

HR Croatia Puls 1.000 18/01/2009 02/02/2009 3.734.300 TR Turkey TNS PIAR 1.005 17/01/2009 10/02/2009 47.583.830 MK Former

Yugoslav Rep. of Macedonia

TNS Brima 1.009 17/01/2009 24/01/2009 1.648.012

TOTAL 30.232 16/01/2009 22/02/2009 453.865.399


49

QUESTIONNAIRE

QE

1aQ

E1a

(557-558)

(557-558)

11

22

33

44

55

66

77

88

99

1010

1111

QE

1ao

QE

1ao

12

(559,560-561)

12

(559,560-561)

Que

l aut

re ?

(NO

TER

EN

CLA

IR -

CO

DE

R A

U B

UR

EA

U -

UN

E S

EU

LE R

EP

ON

SE

)

EB

69.2

QE

1b1o

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

Aut

re (S

PO

NTA

NE

- S

PE

CIF

IER

)N

SP

EB

69.2

QE

1b1

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

PO

SE

R Q

E1a

o S

I "A

UTR

E",

CO

DE

9 E

N Q

E1a

- LE

S A

UTR

ES

ALL

ER

EN

QE

1b

La p

rolif

érat

ion

d’ar

mes

nuc

léai

res

Des

con

flits

arm

ésL’

augm

enta

tion

de la

pop

ulat

ion

mon

dial

eA

ucun

(SP

ON

TAN

E)

Le te

rror

ism

e in

tern

atio

nal

La p

auvr

eté,

le m

anqu

e de

nou

rritu

re e

t d’e

au p

otab

leLa

pro

paga

tion

d’un

e m

alad

ie in

fect

ieus

eU

n im

porta

nt re

cul d

e l’é

cono

mie

mon

dial

e

A T

OU

S

Sel

on v

ous,

par

mi l

es p

robl

èmes

sui

vant

s le

quel

con

sidé

rez-

vous

act

uelle

men

t com

me

le

plus

sér

ieux

pou

r le

mon

de d

ans

son

ense

mbl

e ?

En

prem

ier ?

(MO

NTR

ER

CA

RTE

- LI

RE

- U

NE

SE

ULE

RE

PO

NS

E)

Le c

hang

emen

t clim

atiq

ue

E. L

E C

HA

NG

EM

EN

T C

LIM

ATI

QU

E

Whi

ch o

ther

?

(WR

ITE

DO

WN

- C

OD

E A

T TH

E O

FFIC

E -

ON

E A

NS

WE

R O

NLY

)

EB

69.2

QE

1b1o

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

Oth

er (S

PO

NTA

NE

OU

S -

SP

EC

IFIY

)D

K

EB

69.2

QE

1b1

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

AS

K Q

E1a

o O

NLY

IF "O

THE

R",

CO

DE

9 IN

QE

1a -

OTH

ER

S G

O T

O Q

E1b

The

prol

ifera

tion

of n

ucle

ar w

eapo

nsA

rmed

con

flict

sTh

e in

crea

sing

wor

ld p

opul

atio

nN

one

(SP

ON

TAN

EO

US

)

Inte

rnat

iona

l ter

roris

mP

over

ty, l

ack

of fo

od a

nd d

rinki

ng w

ater

The

spre

ad o

f an

infe

ctio

us d

isea

se

A m

ajor

glo

bal e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n

AS

K A

LL

In y

our o

pini

on, w

hich

of t

he fo

llow

ing

do y

ou c

onsi

der t

o be

the

mos

t ser

ious

pro

blem

cu

rren

tly fa

cing

the

wor

ld a

s a

who

le?

Firs

tly?

(SH

OW

CA

RD

- R

EA

D O

UT

- ON

E A

NS

WE

R O

NLY

)

Clim

ate

chan

ge

E. C

LIM

ATE

CH

AN

GE

Que

stio

nnai

reE

B71

146

/73

07/0

1/20

09

QE

1bQ

E1b

(562-571)

(562-571)

1,1,

2,2,

3,3,

4,4,

5,5,

6,6,

7,7,

8,8,

9,9,

10,

10,

QE

1bo

QE

1bo

32

(572,573-578)

32

(572,573-578)

(NO

TER

EN

CLA

IR -

CO

DE

R A

U B

UR

EA

U -

MA

X. 3

RE

PO

NS

ES

)

EB

69.2

QE

1b2o

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

NS

P

EB

69.2

QE

1b2

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

PO

SE

R Q

E1b

o S

I "A

UTR

E",

CO

DE

9 E

N Q

E1b

- LE

S A

UTR

ES

ALL

ER

EN

QE

2

Que

l(s) a

utre

(s) ?

La p

rolif

érat

ion

d’ar

mes

nuc

léai

res

Des

con

flits

arm

ésL’

augm

enta

tion

de la

pop

ulat

ion

mon

dial

eA

utre

(SP

ON

TAN

E -

SP

EC

IFIE

R)

Le te

rror

ism

e in

tern

atio

nal

La p

auvr

eté,

le m

anqu

e de

nou

rritu

re e

t d’e

au p

otab

leLa

pro

paga

tion

d’un

e m

alad

ie in

fect

ieus

eU

n im

porta

nt re

cul d

e l’é

cono

mie

mon

dial

e

A T

OU

S

Et e

nsui

te ?

(MO

NTR

ER

CA

RTE

- LI

RE

- M

AX

. 3 R

EP

ON

SE

S)

Le c

hang

emen

t clim

atiq

ue

(WR

ITE

DO

WN

- C

OD

E A

T TH

E O

FFIC

E -

MA

X. 3

AN

SW

ER

S)

EB

69.2

QE

1b2o

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

DK

EB

69.2

QE

1b2

(NO

MO

RE

SP

LIT)

AS

K Q

E1b

o O

NLY

IF "O

THE

R",

CO

DE

9 IN

QE

1b -

OTH

ER

S G

O T

O Q

E2

Whi

ch o

ther

(s) ?

The

prol

ifera

tion

of n

ucle

ar w

eapo

nsA

rmed

con

flict

sTh

e in

crea

sing

wor

ld p

opul

atio

nO

ther

(SP

ON

TAN

EO

US

- S

PE

CIF

Y)

Inte

rnat

iona

l ter

roris

mP

over

ty, l

ack

of fo

od a

nd d

rinki

ng w

ater

The

spre

ad o

f an

infe

ctio

us d

isea

se

A m

ajor

glo

bal e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n

AS

K A

LL

Any

oth

ers?

(SH

OW

CA

RD

- R

EA

D O

UT

- MA

X. 3

AN

SW

ER

S)

Clim

ate

chan

ge

Que

stio

nnai

reE

B71

147

/73

07/0

1/20

09

QE

2Q

E2

(579-580)

(579-580)

1 Not

at

all

a se

rio us

prob

lem

23

45

67

89

10 A

pr

obl

em

extre

mel

y se

rio us

1 Pas

un

pr

obl

ème

série ux

du

tout

23

45

67

89

10

Un

prob

lèm

e ex

trêm

em ent

série ux

12

34

56

78

910

12

34

56

78

910

1111

QE

3Q

E3

(581)

1(581)

1

(582)

2

(582)

2

(583)

3

(583)

34

5

EB

69.2

QE

3

Les

man

ière

s do

nt n

ous

pouv

ons

lutte

r con

tre le

ch

ange

men

t clim

atiq

ue

12

3

45

Les

diffé

rent

es

cons

éque

nces

du

chan

gem

ent c

limat

ique

12

34

5

Les

diffé

rent

es c

ause

s du

ch

ange

men

t clim

atiq

ue

12

3

Per

sonn

elle

men

t, pe

nsez

-vou

s qu

e vo

us ê

tes

bien

info

rmé(

e) o

u pa

s bi

en in

form

é(e)

sur

… ?

(MO

NTR

ER

CA

RTE

AV

EC

EC

HE

LLE

- U

NE

RE

PO

NS

E P

AR

LIG

NE

)

(LIR

E -

RO

TATI

ON

)Tr

ès b

ien

info

rmé(

e)P

lutô

t bie

n in

form

é(e)

Pas

très

bi

en

info

rmé(

e)

Pas

du

tout

in

form

é(e)

NS

P

Et d

ans

quel

le m

esur

e pe

nsez

-vou

s qu

e le

cha

ngem

ent c

limat

ique

est

un

prob

lèm

e sé

rieux

ac

tuel

lem

ent ?

Util

isez

s'il

vous

pla

ît ce

tte é

chel

le d

e 1

à 10

où

'1' s

igni

fie q

ue c

e n’

est "

pas

du to

ut u

n pr

oblè

me

série

ux" e

t '10

' que

c’e

st "u

n pr

oblè

me

extrê

mem

ent s

érie

ux".

(MO

NTR

ER

CA

RTE

- U

NE

SE

ULE

RE

PO

NS

E)

NS

P

EB

69.2

QE

2b (N

O M

OR

E S

PLI

T)

A T

OU

S

45

EB

69.2

QE

3

Way

s in

whi

ch w

e ca

n fig

ht

clim

ate

chan

ge1

23

45

The

diffe

rent

con

sequ

ence

s of

clim

ate

chan

ge

12

34

5

The

diffe

rent

cau

ses

of

clim

ate

chan

ge

12

3

Per

sona

lly, d

o yo

u th

ink

that

you

are

wel

l inf

orm

ed o

r not

abo

ut…

?

(SH

OW

CA

RD

WIT

H S

CA

LE -

ON

E A

NS

WE

R P

ER

LIN

E)

(RE

AD

OU

T - R

OTA

TE)

Ver

y w

ell

info

rmed

Fa

irly

wel

l in

form

edN

ot v

ery

wel

l in

form

ed

Not

at a

ll in

form

edD

K

And

how

ser

ious

a p

robl

em d

o yo

u th

ink

clim

ate

chan

ge is

at t

his

mom

ent?

Ple

ase

use

a sc

ale

from

1 to

10,

'1' w

ould

mea

n th

at it

is "n

ot a

t all

a se

rious

pro

blem

" and

'10'

wou

ld m

ean

that

it is

a p

robl

em e

xtre

mel

y se

rious

".

(SH

OW

CA

RD

- O

NE

AN

SW

ER

ON

LY)

DK

EB

69.2

QE

2b (N

O M

OR

E S

PLI

T)

AS

K A

LL

Que

stio

nnai

reE

B71

148

/73

07/0

1/20

09

QE

4Q

E4

(584)

1

(584)

1

(585)

2

(585)

2

(586)

3

(586)

3

(587)

4

(587)

4

(588)

5

(588)

5

(589)

6

(589)

6

EB

69.2

QE

5

45

Vou

s av

ez p

erso

nnel

lem

ent

pris

des

act

ions

pou

r co

ntrib

uer à

la lu

tte c

ontre

le

chan

gem

ent c

limat

ique

12

34

5

Des

car

bura

nts

alte

rnat

ifs

tels

que

les

"bio

carb

uran

ts"

devr

aien

t être

util

isés

pou

r ré

duire

les

émis

sion

s de

gaz

à

effe

t de

serr

e

12

3

45

La lu

tte c

ontre

le

chan

gem

ent c

limat

ique

peu

t av

oir u

n ef

fet p

ositi

f sur

l’é

cono

mie

eur

opée

nne

12

34

5

Les

émis

sion

s de

CO

2 (d

ioxy

de c

arbo

ne\ g

az

carb

oniq

ue) n

’ont

qu’

un e

ffet

mar

gina

l sur

le c

hang

emen

t cl

imat

ique

12

3

45

La g

ravi

té d

u ch

ange

men

t cl

imat

ique

a é

té e

xagé

rée

12

34

5

Le c

hang

emen

t clim

atiq

ue

est u

n pr

oces

sus

impo

ssib

le

à ar

rête

r, no

us n

’y p

ouvo

ns

rien

12

3

(MO

NTR

ER

CA

RTE

AV

EC

EC

HE

LLE

- U

NE

RE

PO

NS

E P

AR

LIG

NE

) IN

TER

VIE

WE

R: S

i né

cess

aire

, exp

lique

r que

le C

O2

(dio

xyde

de

carb

one

ou g

az c

arbo

niqu

e) e

st u

n ga

z qu

i est

no

tam

men

t pro

duit

lors

de

la c

ombu

stio

n de

car

bura

nts

foss

iles.

Par

exe

mpl

e, p

ar to

us le

s m

odes

de

trans

port

ains

i que

par

les

usin

es in

dust

rielle

s et

gro

upes

éle

ctro

gène

s qu

i util

isen

t de

s hy

droc

arbu

res)

(LIR

E -

RO

TATI

ON

ITE

MS

1

A 5

)To

ut à

fait

d’ac

cord

Plu

tôt

d’ac

cord

Plu

tôt p

as

d’ac

cord

Pas

du

tout

d’

acco

rd

NS

P

Pou

r cha

cune

des

affi

rmat

ions

sui

vant

es, v

euill

ez m

e di

re s

i vou

s êt

es to

ut à

fait

d’ac

cord

, pl

utôt

d’a

ccor

d, p

lutô

t pas

d’a

ccor

d ou

pas

du

tout

d’a

ccor

d.

EB

69.2

QE

5

45

You

per

sona

lly h

ave

take

n ac

tions

aim

ed a

t hel

ping

to

fight

clim

ate

chan

ge

12

34

5

Alte

rnat

ive

fuel

s, s

uch

as

"bio

fuel

s", s

houl

d be

use

d to

redu

ce g

reen

hous

e ga

s em

issi

ons

12

3

45

Figh

ting

clim

ate

chan

ge c

an

have

a p

ositi

ve im

pact

on

the

Eur

opea

n ec

onom

y

12

34

5

Em

issi

on o

f CO

2 (C

arbo

n di

oxid

e) h

as o

nly

a m

argi

nal

impa

ct o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

12

3

45

The

serio

usne

ss o

f clim

ate

chan

ge h

as b

een

exag

gera

ted

12

34

5

Clim

ate

chan

ge is

an

unst

oppa

ble

proc

ess,

we

cann

ot d

o an

ythi

ng a

bout

it

12

3

(SH

OW

CA

RD

WIT

H S

CA

LE -

ON

E A

NS

WE

R P

ER

LIN

E) I

NTE

RV

IEW

ER

: if n

eces

sary

, ex

plai

n th

at C

O2

(car

bon

diox

ide)

is a

gas

gen

erat

ed n

otab

ly in

the

com

bust

ion

of fo

ssil

fuel

s,

for e

xam

ple

by a

ll ty

pes

of tr

ansp

ort t

hat u

se h

ydro

carb

ons

and

by in

dust

rial p

lant

s an

d po

wer

gen

erat

ors

usin

g fo

ssil

fuel

s)

(RE

AD

OU

T - R

OTA

TE

ITE

MS

1 T

O 5

)To

tally

ag

ree

Tend

to

agre

eTe

nd to

di

sagr

eeTo

tally

di

sagr

eeD

K

For e

ach

of th

e fo

llow

ing

stat

emen

ts, p

leas

e te

ll m

e w

heth

er y

ou to

tally

agr

ee, t

end

to a

gree

, te

nd to

dis

agre

e or

tota

lly d

isag

ree.

Que

stio

nnai

reE

B71

149

/73

07/0

1/20

09


54

TABLES

TO

TA

L

Le changement climatique/Climate change

Le terrorisme international/International terrorism

La pauvreté, le manque de nourriture et d’eau potable/


La propagation d’une maladie infectieuse/


Un important recul de l’économie mondiale/


La prolifération d’armes nucléaires/


Des conflits armés/Armed conflicts

L’augmentation de la population mondiale/The increasing world

population

Aucun (SPONTANE)/None (SPONTANEOUS)

Autre (SPONTANE)/Other (SPONTANEOUS)

NSP/DK

UE27

EU

27

26718

18%

11%

30%

3%

22%

3%

7%

4%

- -

2%

BE

1018

22%

10%

30%

2%

23%

4%

4%

5%

- -

- BG

1000

11%

12%

24%

3%

37%

2%

7%

1%

- -

3%

CZ

1050

8%

12%

15%

5%

47%

3%

6%

2%

1%

- 1%

DK

1016

20%

9%

29%

1%

28%

3%

4%

5%

- -

1%

D-W

1006

24%

11%

35%

1%

15%

3%

4%

7%

- -

- D

E1523

24%

10%

35%

1%

16%

3%

4%

7%

- -

- D

-E517

21%

6%

36%

3%

20%

2%

5%

7%

- -

- EE

1003

14%

9%

18%

4%

35%

2%

11%

5%

- 1%

1%

EL

1000

21%

6%

31%

1%

33%

3%

4%

1%

- -

- ES

1003

14%

14%

38%

1%

17%

1%

10%

1%

1%

1%

2%

FR1035

19%

8%

41%

3%

15%

4%

5%

4%

- -

1%

IE1000

18%

8%

20%

3%

38%

3%

3%

4%

- -

3%

IT1060

15%

17%

26%

4%

16%

3%

9%

2%

2%

1%

5%

CY

504

30%

5%

36%

1%

16%

3%

6%

3%

- -

- CY (

tcc)

500

25%

16%

14%

3%

24%

4%

10%

2%

- -

2%

LV1001

16%

6%

24%

3%

37%

1%

9%

1%

1%

- 2%

L T1010

16%

7%

12%

2%

49%

4%

6%

1%

1%

- 2%

LU504

19%

10%

33%

2%

16%

4%

6%

8%

- 1%

1%

HU

1023

19%

4%

33%

4%

31%

2%

3%

4%

- -

- M

T500

21%

18%

17%

3%

31%

1%

4%

2%

- 1%

2%

NL

1044

17%

3%

33%

1%

28%

1%

6%

9%

1%

1%

- AT

1000

27%

11%

23%

4%

10%

4%

10%

7%

1%

1%

2%

P L1000

13%

15%

27%

5%

20%

3%

11%

1%

1%

- 4%

P T1000

10%

6%

41%

4%

21%

2%

9%

2%

- -

5%

RO

1043

16%

8%

25%

4%

34%

1%

5%

1%

- 1%

5%

SI

1008

17%

6%

29%

1%

39%

1%

3%

3%

- 1%

- SK

1025

11%

8%

19%

3%

43%

3%

9%

3%

- -

1%

FI1017

25%

4%

28%

2%

24%

3%

5%

8%

- -

1%

SE

1017

39%

2%

36%

1%

8%

2%

3%

8%

- 1%

- U

K1314

20%

12%

19%

2%

28%

2%

6%

8%

1%

- 2%

HR

1000

17%

12%

40%

2%

15%

3%

8%

1%

- 1%

1%

TR

1005

14%

17%

22%

2%

19%

5%

12%

4%

1%

1%

3%

MK

1009

13%

12%

37%

5%

19%

2%

8%

1%

-1%

2%

QE1a

Sel

on v

ous,

par

mi le

s pro

blè

mes

suiv

ants

leq

uel

consi

dér

ez-v

ous

actu

elle

men

t co

mm

e le

plu

s sé

rieu

x pour

le m

onde

dan

s so

n e

nse

mble

?En p

rem

ier

? Q

E1a

In y

our

opin

ion,

whic

h o

f th

e fo

llow

ing d

o y

ou c

onsi

der

to b

e th

e m

ost

ser

ious

pro

ble

m c

urr

ently

faci

ng t

he

world a

s a

whol

e?Fi

rstly?

TO

TA

L





La propagation d’une maladie infectieuse/


Un important recul de l’économie mondiale/


La prolifération d’armes nucléaires/




population



NSP/DK

UE27

EU

27

26049

33%

32%

37%

16%

31%

17%

33%

16%

0%

2%

BE

1011

32%

28%

40%

13%

31%

17%

30%

18%

0%

1%

BG

974

33%

38%

39%

11%

34%

16%

46%

8%

0%

2%

CZ

1031

25%

31%

31%

19%

23%

17%

33%

9%

0%

2%

DK

1009

44%

36%

42%

15%

33%

13%

39%

17%

- 2%

D-W

1002

43%

37%

40%

16%

38%

20%

35%

24%

- 1%

DE

1518

42%

36%

40%

17%

38%

21%

35%

24%

0%

1%

D-E

515

36%

28%

39%

23%

39%

24%

36%

23%

0%

0%

EE

988

23%

25%

39%

18%

30%

11%

43%

16%

0%

4%

EL

1000

50%

33%

41%

10%

35%

28%

37%

11%

0%

0%

ES

978

31%

36%

35%

10%

34%

18%

42%

8%

1%

2%

FR1027

32%

26%

38%

15%

29%

20%

30%

21%

1%

2%

IE965

42%

29%

40%

26%

30%

17%

26%

18%

1%

2%

IT988

28%

33%

33%

20%

28%

19%

26%

7%

0%

1%

CY

503

46%

28%

45%

17%

40%

27%

44%

22%

- -

CY (

tcc)

492

36%

21%

28%

9%

27%

16%

20%

15%

- 1%

LV975

28%

24%

37%

22%

33%

8%

39%

8%

- 4%

L T987

32%

28%

40%

17%

27%

17%

38%

6%

1%

3%

LU497

35%

32%

43%

19%

30%

22%

28%

23%

1%

2%

HU

1018

43%

23%

41%

23%

36%

14%

28%

24%

0%

3%

MT

491

42%

32%

36%

24%

23%

14%

18%

7%

1%

7%

NL

1034

40%

28%

43%

15%

30%

14%

37%

23%

1%

1%

AT

964

38%

38%

46%

18%

32%

26%

33%

21%

1%

0%

P L960

21%

28%

32%

15%

23%

12%

33%

4%

- 3%

P T946

22%

27%

38%

19%

32%

12%

34%

9%

1%

4%

RO

988

37%

35%

34%

18%

34%

13%

36%

7%

0%

7%

SI

1005

45%

28%

47%

15%

34%

14%

31%

16%

0%

1%

SK

1017

42%

39%

42%

19%

27%

13%

40%

15%

0%

2%

FI1012

41%

25%

43%

20%

33%

16%

30%

25%

0%

2%

SE

1016

43%

23%

46%

25%

24%

20%

39%

31%

1%

1%

UK

1280

26%

34%

30%

13%

28%

11%

27%

20%

0%

4%

HR

986

29%

28%

42%

15%

35%

11%

36%

5%

0%

1%

TR

970

18%

23%

29%

5%

23%

17%

19%

11%

1%

8%

MK

990

29%

26%

32%

23%

30%

12%

28%

3%

1%

3%

QE1b

Sel

on

vous,

par

mile

spro

blè

mes

suiv

ants

lesq

uel

sco

nsi

dér

ez-v

ous

actu

elle

men

tco

mm

ele

sau

tres

pro

blè

mes

les

plu

ssé

rieu

xpour

lem

onde

dan

sso

nen

sem

ble

? (

MAX.

3 R

EPO

NSES)

QE1b

Inyo

ur

opin

ion,

whic

hof

the

follo

win

gdo

you

consi

der

tobe

the

oth

erm

ost

serious

pro

ble

ms

curr

ently

faci

ng

the

world

asa

whole

?(M

AX.

3AN

SW

ERS)

TO

TA

L




Poverty, lack of food and La propagation d’une maladie infectieuse/

The spread of an infectious Un important recul de l’économie mondiale/

A major global economic La prolifération d’armes

nucléaires/The proliferation of nuclear





NSP/DK

UE27

EU

27

26718

50%

42%

66%

18%

52%

19%

39%

19%

0%

1%

2%

BE

1018

54%

37%

69%

15%

54%

21%

34%

22%

0%

1%

0%

BG

1000

43%

50%

62%

14%

71%

18%

52%

9%

0%

0%

3%

CZ

1050

33%

42%

45%

24%

69%

19%

38%

11%

1%

0%

1%

DK

1016

64%

45%

71%

15%

61%

16%

43%

22%

- 0%

1%

D-W

1006

67%

48%

75%

17%

53%

22%

38%

31%

0%

0%

0%

DE

1523

65%

46%

75%

19%

54%

23%

39%

31%

0%

0%

0%

D-E

517

56%

34%

75%

25%

59%

27%

41%

30%

0%

1%

0%

EE

1003

37%

33%

56%

22%

65%

13%

54%

20%

0%

1%

1%

EL

1000

71%

39%

72%

12%

68%

32%

42%

12%

- 1%

- ES

1003

44%

49%

73%

11%

50%

19%

51%

9%

0%

1%

2%

FR1035

51%

34%

80%

18%

44%

24%

35%

26%

- 1%

1%

IE1000

58%

36%

59%

28%

67%

19%

28%

21%

- 1%

3%

IT1060

41%

48%

56%

23%

43%

21%

34%

8%

2%

1%

5%

CY

504

76%

33%

81%

19%

55%

30%

51%

25%

- 0%

0%

CY (

tcc)

500

61%

36%

42%

11%

51%

20%

30%

17%

- -

2%

LV1001

43%

29%

60%

25%

69%

9%

46%

9%

0%

0%

2%

LT1010

47%

35%

51%

18%

76%

20%

44%

8%

1%

1%

2%

LU504

54%

42%

76%

21%

45%

25%

33%

30%

0%

1%

1%

HU

1023

61%

27%

73%

27%

67%

16%

30%

28%

0%

1%

0%

MT

500

61%

50%

52%

26%

53%

15%

22%

9%

- 3%

2%

NL

1044

57%

31%

75%

16%

58%

14%

42%

32%

1%

2%

0%

AT

1000

63%

47%

67%

22%

41%

29%

42%

28%

1%

1%

2%

PL1000

33%

42%

58%

19%

42%

15%

43%

5%

1%

- 3%

PT1000

30%

32%

77%

22%

52%

13%

41%

10%

- 1%

5%

RO

1043

51%

41%

57%

21%

66%

14%

39%

7%

- 1%

5%

SI

1008

61%

34%

76%

16%

73%

15%

34%

18%

0%

1%

0%

SK

1025

53%

47%

61%

22%

70%

16%

49%

17%

- 0%

1%

FI1017

67%

29%

70%

22%

57%

19%

35%

33%

0%

0%

0%

SE

1017

82%

25%

82%

26%

33%

21%

41%

40%

0%

1%

- U

K1314

46%

45%

49%

14%

55%

13%

33%

27%

0%

0%

2%

HR

1000

46%

39%

81%

17%

50%

14%

43%

6%

- 1%

1%

TR

1005

32%

40%

51%

7%

41%

21%

30%

15%

0%

1%

3%

MK

1009

42%

38%

69%

28%

47%

14%

35%

3%

-2%

2%

QE1T Q

uel

s pro

blè

mes

consi

dér

ez-v

ous

com

me

les

plu

s sé

rieu

x pour

le m

onde

dan

s so

n e

nse

mble

?Q

E1T W

hic

h d

o y

ou c

onsi

der

to b

e th

e m

ost

ser

ious

pro

ble

ms

curr

ently

faci

ng t

he

world a

s a

whole

?

TO

TA

L

1Pas un problème sérieux

du tout/Not a serious problem at

all

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10Un problème

extrêmement sérieux/An extremely serious

problem

NSP/DK

Moyenne/Average

UE27

EU

27

26718

2%

1%

3%

4%

11%

9%

16%

19%

9%

23%

3%

7.4

BE

1018

2%

1%

3%

5%

14%

7%

18%

19%

8%

22%

1%

7.2

BG

1000

1%

- 2%

4%

8%

11%

16%

18%

13%

23%

4%

7.6

CZ

1050

2%

1%

3%

4%

10%

9%

17%

19%

9%

25%

1%

7.4

DK

1016

3%

1%

4%

5%

12%

10%

20%

18%

7%

19%

1%

7.0

D-W

1006

1%

- 2%

4%

11%

8%

14%

19%

8%

32%

1%

7.7

DE

1523

2%

1%

2%

4%

11%

8%

15%

19%

7%

30%

1%

7.6

D-E

517

5%

1%

5%

5%

11%

9%

16%

18%

4%

26%

- 7.0

EE

1003

7%

2%

4%

5%

20%

11%

15%

12%

4%

18%

2%

6.4

EL

1000

- -

- -

3%

3%

9%

19%

26%

40%

- 8.8

ES

1003

2%

1%

3%

3%

6%

11%

19%

20%

13%

18%

4%

7.4

FR1035

1%

- 2%

1%

9%

5%

17%

23%

10%

31%

1%

7.9

IE1000

1%

1%

3%

3%

12%

11%

18%

21%

10%

16%

4%

7.2

IT1060

1%

1%

3%

3%

8%

11%

19%

21%

8%

21%

4%

7.4

CY

504

- -

1%

2%

2%

3%

9%

18%

14%

51%

- 8.9

CY (

tcc)

500

2%

1%

1%

1%

10%

7%

6%

8%

6%

56%

2%

8.4

LV1001

3%

2%

5%

5%

15%

12%

14%

14%

4%

24%

2%

6.9

LT1010

2%

2%

2%

4%

14%

8%

12%

16%

8%

29%

3%

7.4

LU504

3%

3%

3%

3%

15%

9%

13%

15%

6%

29%

1%

7.2

HU

1023

- -

1%

2%

7%

6%

17%

23%

11%

32%

1%

8.1

MT

500

1%

- 1%

1%

8%

6%

10%

28%

14%

27%

4%

8.1

NL

1044

3%

1%

5%

5%

15%

13%

19%

22%

6%

10%

1%

6.6

AT

1000

2%

2%

4%

5%

11%

12%

16%

20%

7%

20%

1%

7.1

PL1000

2%

1%

3%

6%

12%

10%

17%

19%

7%

18%

5%

7.0

PT1000

- 1%

2%

3%

12%

10%

13%

15%

13%

26%

5%

7.7

RO

1043

- 1%

1%

2%

6%

9%

11%

16%

13%

31%

10%

8.0

SI

1008

- 1%

2%

2%

5%

7%

10%

17%

7%

49%

- 8.4

SK

1025

- -

2%

2%

9%

11%

20%

23%

15%

17%

1%

7.6

FI1017

2%

1%

3%

4%

11%

10%

19%

25%

12%

13%

- 7.2

SE

1017

1%

2%

3%

3%

11%

8%

21%

22%

9%

20%

- 7.3

UK

1314

4%

3%

4%

6%

18%

12%

16%

14%

7%

14%

2%

6.5

HR

1000

1%

1%

1%

3%

10%

9%

14%

18%

11%

30%

2%

7.8

TR

1005

2%

1%

3%

3%

9%

7%

8%

15%

12%

32%

8%

7.8

MK

1009

1%

1%

3%

3%

12%

12%

15%

14%

8%

25%

6%

7.4

QE2

Et

dan

squel

lem

esure

pen

sez-

vous

que

lech

angem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

est

un

pro

blè

me

sérieu

xac

tuel

lem

ent

?U

tilis

ezs'

ilvo

us

pla

îtce

tte

échel

le d

e 1 à

10 o

ù '1' si

gnifie

que

ce n

’est

"pas

du t

out

un p

roblè

me

sérieu

x" e

t '1

0' que

c’es

t "u

n p

roblè

me

extr

êmem

ent

sérieu

x".

QE2

And

how

serious

apro

ble

mdo

you

thin

kcl

imat

ech

ange

isat

this

mom

ent?

Plea

seuse

asc

ale

from

1to

10,

wher

e'1

'w

ould

mea

nth

atit

is "

not

at a

ll a

serious

pro

ble

m"

and '10' w

ould

mea

n t

hat

it

is a

pro

ble

m e

xtre

mel

y se

rious"

.

TO

TA

L

Très bien informé(e)/

Very well informed

Plutôt bien informé(e)/

Fairly well informed

Pas très bien informé(e)/

Not very well informed

Pas du tout informé(e)/

Not at all informed

NSP/DK

Bien informé(e)/Well informed

Pas informé(e)/Not informed

UE27

EU

27

26718

8%

48%

34%

8%

2%

56%

42%

BE

1018

6%

54%

33%

7%

- 60%

40%

BG

1000

3%

28%

46%

20%

3%

31%

66%

CZ

1050

3%

35%

50%

10%

2%

38%

60%

DK

1016

13%

60%

22%

4%

1%

73%

26%

D-W

1006

10%

58%

27%

5%

- 68%

32%

DE

1523

10%

58%

27%

5%

- 68%

32%

D-E

517

10%

60%

25%

4%

1%

70%

29%

EE

1003

6%

40%

46%

8%

- 46%

54%

EL

1000

10%

45%

36%

9%

- 55%

45%

ES

1003

5%

44%

41%

10%

- 49%

51%

FR1035

7%

51%

34%

7%

1%

58%

41%

IE1000

12%

54%

22%

9%

3%

66%

31%

IT1060

4%

37%

37%

16%

6%

41%

53%

CY

504

10%

48%

36%

6%

- 58%

42%

CY (

tcc)

500

19%

25%

34%

15%

7%

44%

49%

LV1001

5%

46%

40%

8%

1%

51%

48%

LT1010

6%

36%

44%

13%

1%

42%

57%

LU504

14%

52%

29%

5%

- 66%

34%

HU

1023

5%

50%

37%

8%

- 55%

45%

MT

500

8%

36%

41%

14%

1%

44%

55%

NL

1044

16%

64%

18%

1%

1%

80%

19%

AT

1000

5%

45%

42%

7%

1%

50%

49%

PL1000

4%

38%

45%

10%

3%

42%

55%

PT1000

2%

28%

45%

23%

2%

30%

68%

RO

1043

3%

28%

46%

17%

6%

31%

63%

SI

1008

13%

59%

24%

4%

- 72%

28%

SK

1025

7%

38%

47%

8%

- 45%

55%

FI1017

13%

64%

21%

2%

- 77%

23%

SE

1017

21%

66%

12%

1%

- 87%

13%

UK

1314

17%

56%

22%

4%

1%

73%

26%

HR

1000

7%

42%

43%

8%

- 49%

51%

TR

1005

3%

22%

31%

33%

11%

25%

64%

MK

1009

9%

37%

35%

16%

3%

46%

51%

QE3.1

Per

sonnel

lem

ent,

pen

sez-

vous

que

vous

êtes

bie

n info

rmé(

e) o

u p

as b

ien info

rmé(

e) s

ur

… ?

Q

E3.1

Per

sonal

ly,

do y

ou t

hin

k th

at y

ou a

re w

ell in

form

ed o

r not

about…

? Le

s diffé

rente

s ca

use

s du c

han

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

The

diffe

rent

cause

s of

clim

ate

chan

ge

TO

TA

L


Very well informed






Not at all informed

NSP/DK



UE27

EU

27

26718

8%

48%

33%

9%

2%

56%

42%

BE

1018

6%

51%

35%

7%

1%

57%

42%

BG

1000

4%

29%

45%

19%

3%

33%

64%

CZ

1050

3%

34%

51%

10%

2%

37%

61%

DK

1016

12%

58%

25%

4%

1%

70%

29%

D-W

1006

9%

59%

28%

4%

- 68%

32%

DE

1523

9%

59%

27%

4%

1%

68%

31%

D-E

517

11%

60%

24%

4%

1%

71%

28%

EE

1003

4%

42%

46%

7%

1%

46%

53%

EL

1000

9%

49%

34%

8%

- 58%

42%

ES

1003

5%

46%

40%

9%

- 51%

49%

FR1035

8%

49%

33%

9%

1%

57%

42%

IE1000

12%

53%

23%

9%

3%

65%

32%

IT1060

4%

38%

36%

16%

6%

42%

52%

CY

504

12%

52%

30%

5%

1%

64%

35%

CY (

tcc)

500

18%

27%

32%

15%

8%

45%

47%

LV1001

6%

47%

39%

7%

1%

53%

46%

LT1010

6%

38%

43%

12%

1%

44%

55%

LU504

14%

54%

27%

5%

- 68%

32%

HU

1023

6%

51%

36%

7%

- 57%

43%

MT

500

9%

37%

38%

14%

2%

46%

52%

NL

1044

15%

63%

19%

2%

1%

78%

21%

AT

1000

5%

43%

44%

7%

1%

48%

51%

PL1000

5%

39%

43%

9%

4%

44%

52%

PT1000

3%

26%

45%

24%

2%

29%

69%

RO

1043

4%

27%

45%

18%

6%

31%

63%

SI

1008

14%

60%

23%

3%

- 74%

26%

SK

1025

7%

36%

48%

9%

- 43%

57%

FI1017

12%

65%

21%

2%

- 77%

23%

SE

1017

17%

67%

15%

1%

- 84%

16%

UK

1314

17%

55%

23%

4%

1%

72%

27%

HR

1000

7%

44%

40%

9%

- 51%

49%

TR

1005

3%

23%

29%

34%

11%

26%

63%

MK

1009

10%

39%

31%

16%

4%

49%

47%

QE3.2

Per

sonnel

lem

ent,

pen

sez-

vous

que

vous

êtes

bie

n info

rmé(

e) o

u p

as b

ien info

rmé(

e) s

ur

… ?

Q

E3.2

Per

sonal

ly,

do y

ou t

hin

k th

at y

ou a

re w

ell in

form

ed o

r not

about…

? Le

s diffé

rente

s co

nsé

quen

ces

du c

han

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

The

diffe

rent

conse

quen

ces

of

clim

ate

chan

ge

TO

TA

L


Very well informed






Not at all informed

NSP/DK



UE27

EU

27

26718

8%

44%

37%

9%

2%

52%

46%

BE

1018

5%

49%

38%

7%

1%

54%

45%

BG

1000

3%

18%

50%

24%

5%

21%

74%

CZ

1050

3%

32%

51%

12%

2%

35%

63%

DK

1016

12%

54%

29%

4%

1%

66%

33%

D-W

1006

7%

53%

34%

5%

1%

60%

39%

DE

1523

8%

53%

34%

5%

- 61%

39%

D-E

517

9%

54%

32%

4%

1%

63%

36%

EE

1003

4%

37%

48%

11%

- 41%

59%

EL

1000

8%

38%

45%

9%

- 46%

54%

ES

1003

4%

46%

40%

9%

1%

50%

49%

FR1035

8%

47%

37%

7%

1%

55%

44%

IE1000

13%

54%

20%

9%

4%

67%

29%

IT1060

3%

35%

40%

16%

6%

38%

56%

CY

504

8%

40%

44%

8%

- 48%

52%

CY (

tcc)

500

16%

23%

33%

20%

8%

39%

53%

LV1001

4%

38%

46%

11%

1%

42%

57%

LT1010

5%

31%

48%

15%

1%

36%

63%

LU504

12%

48%

32%

7%

1%

60%

39%

HU

1023

5%

42%

43%

9%

1%

47%

52%

MT

500

7%

42%

36%

13%

2%

49%

49%

NL

1044

12%

60%

25%

2%

1%

72%

27%

AT

1000

5%

41%

44%

8%

2%

46%

52%

PL1000

4%

34%

48%

10%

4%

38%

58%

PT1000

2%

26%

46%

24%

2%

28%

70%

RO

1043

3%

23%

46%

21%

7%

26%

67%

SI

1008

12%

57%

27%

4%

- 69%

31%

SK

1025

6%

30%

49%

13%

2%

36%

62%

FI1017

10%

65%

23%

2%

- 75%

25%

SE

1017

15%

61%

22%

1%

1%

76%

23%

UK

1314

17%

55%

23%

3%

2%

72%

26%

HR

1000

6%

36%

46%

11%

1%

42%

57%

TR

1005

3%

19%

29%

37%

12%

22%

66%

MK

1009

8%

27%

38%

22%

5%

35%

60%

QE3.3

Per

sonnel

lem

ent,

pen

sez-

vous

que

vous

êtes

bie

n info

rmé(

e) o

u p

as b

ien info

rmé(

e) s

ur

… ?

Q

E3.3

Per

sonal

ly,

do y

ou t

hin

k th

at y

ou a

re w

ell in

form

ed o

r not

about…

? Le

s m

aniè

res

dont

nous

pouvo

ns

lutt

er c

ontr

e le

chan

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

Way

s in

whic

h w

e ca

n f

ight

clim

ate

chan

ge

TO

TA

L

Tout à fait d’accord/

Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree

Plutôt pas d’accord/Tend to disagree

Pas du tout d’accord/

Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree

Pas d'accord/Disagree

UE27

EU

27

26718

7%

24%

37%

25%

7%

31%

62%

BE

1018

8%

21%

42%

27%

2%

29%

69%

BG

1000

8%

27%

37%

13%

15%

35%

50%

CZ

1050

4%

28%

45%

19%

4%

32%

64%

DK

1016

7%

16%

36%

38%

3%

23%

74%

D-W

1006

8%

19%

34%

36%

3%

27%

70%

DE

1523

9%

19%

35%

34%

3%

28%

69%

D-E

517

11%

20%

39%

28%

2%

31%

67%

EE

1003

22%

35%

29%

12%

2%

57%

41%

EL

1000

7%

15%

41%

37%

- 22%

78%

ES

1003

5%

22%

38%

24%

11%

27%

62%

FR1035

8%

24%

39%

24%

5%

32%

63%

IE1000

6%

21%

35%

27%

11%

27%

62%

IT1060

4%

24%

36%

26%

10%

28%

62%

CY

504

7%

24%

30%

32%

7%

31%

62%

CY (

tcc)

500

13%

10%

16%

46%

15%

23%

62%

LV1001

16%

32%

36%

11%

5%

48%

47%

LT1010

12%

28%

36%

17%

7%

40%

53%

LU504

12%

20%

40%

25%

3%

32%

65%

HU

1023

9%

23%

44%

19%

5%

32%

63%

MT

500

1%

7%

49%

30%

13%

8%

79%

NL

1044

10%

19%

30%

38%

3%

29%

68%

AT

1000

5%

22%

36%

31%

6%

27%

67%

PL1000

6%

31%

35%

13%

15%

37%

48%

PT1000

7%

20%

30%

23%

20%

27%

53%

RO

1043

8%

23%

33%

17%

19%

31%

50%

SI

1008

13%

20%

31%

34%

2%

33%

65%

SK

1025

7%

27%

46%

16%

4%

34%

62%

FI1017

7%

24%

46%

21%

2%

31%

67%

SE

1017

3%

17%

31%

49%

- 20%

80%

UK

1314

11%

29%

35%

20%

5%

40%

55%

HR

1000

8%

23%

35%

28%

6%

31%

63%

TR

1005

19%

14%

18%

31%

18%

33%

49%

MK

1009

18%

23%

24%

23%

12%

41%

47%

QE4.1

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.1

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

Le c

han

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

est

un p

roce

ssus

imposs

ible

à a

rrêt

er,

nous

n’y

pouvo

ns

rien

Clim

ate

chan

ge

is a

n u

nst

oppab

le p

roce

ss,

we

cannot

do a

nyt

hin

g a

bout

it

TO

TA

L


Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree



Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree


UE27

EU

27

26718

6%

21%

34%

31%

8%

27%

65%

BE

1018

5%

27%

36%

29%

3%

32%

65%

BG

1000

1%

13%

42%

27%

17%

14%

69%

CZ

1050

5%

24%

41%

26%

4%

29%

67%

DK

1016

8%

24%

35%

29%

4%

32%

64%

D-W

1006

6%

18%

33%

41%

2%

24%

74%

DE

1523

7%

19%

33%

39%

2%

26%

72%

D-E

517

12%

20%

36%

31%

1%

32%

67%

EE

1003

11%

26%

37%

21%

5%

37%

58%

EL

1000

5%

12%

38%

45%

- 17%

83%

ES

1003

7%

19%

32%

33%

9%

26%

65%

FR1035

5%

26%

33%

30%

6%

31%

63%

IE1000

6%

20%

33%

29%

12%

26%

62%

IT1060

4%

19%

33%

32%

12%

23%

65%

CY

504

4%

16%

36%

36%

8%

20%

72%

CY (

tcc)

500

7%

7%

17%

52%

17%

14%

69%

LV1001

5%

23%

41%

26%

5%

28%

67%

LT1010

5%

17%

42%

28%

8%

22%

70%

LU504

12%

31%

29%

23%

5%

43%

52%

HU

1023

2%

15%

43%

35%

5%

17%

78%

MT

500

3%

10%

44%

28%

15%

13%

72%

NL

1044

11%

32%

23%

32%

2%

43%

55%

AT

1000

6%

16%

35%

38%

5%

22%

73%

PL1000

5%

20%

46%

19%

10%

25%

65%

PT1000

4%

16%

33%

27%

20%

20%

60%

RO

1043

5%

19%

32%

21%

23%

24%

53%

SI

1008

2%

13%

33%

50%

2%

15%

83%

SK

1025

2%

12%

49%

31%

6%

14%

80%

FI1017

6%

20%

43%

29%

2%

26%

72%

SE

1017

4%

20%

26%

49%

1%

24%

75%

UK

1314

12%

28%

30%

24%

6%

40%

54%

HR

1000

3%

17%

36%

36%

8%

20%

72%

TR

1005

9%

12%

20%

40%

19%

21%

60%

MK

1009

12%

21%

27%

25%

15%

33%

52%

QE4.2

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.2

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

La g

ravi

té d

u c

han

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

a ét

é ex

agér

éeThe

seriousn

ess

of

clim

ate

chan

ge

has

bee

n e

xagger

ated

TO

TA

L


Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree



Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree


UE27

EU

27

26718

7%

23%

33%

25%

12%

30%

58%

BE

1018

6%

28%

40%

23%

3%

34%

63%

BG

1000

4%

12%

35%

25%

24%

16%

60%

CZ

1050

5%

25%

40%

24%

6%

30%

64%

DK

1016

6%

18%

35%

36%

5%

24%

71%

D-W

1006

5%

20%

35%

33%

7%

25%

68%

DE

1523

7%

21%

35%

31%

6%

28%

66%

D-E

517

14%

27%

34%

21%

4%

41%

55%

EE

1003

12%

33%

26%

15%

14%

45%

41%

EL

1000

4%

23%

42%

28%

3%

27%

70%

ES

1003

5%

24%

26%

22%

23%

29%

48%

FR1035

5%

17%

35%

32%

11%

22%

67%

IE1000

12%

38%

18%

15%

17%

50%

33%

IT1060

7%

25%

31%

22%

15%

32%

53%

CY

504

19%

16%

21%

25%

19%

35%

46%

CY (

tcc)

500

10%

5%

13%

46%

26%

15%

59%

LV1001

9%

31%

29%

19%

12%

40%

48%

LT1010

8%

24%

28%

26%

14%

32%

54%

LU504

9%

21%

36%

26%

8%

30%

62%

HU

1023

6%

13%

31%

45%

5%

19%

76%

MT

500

4%

10%

28%

21%

37%

14%

49%

NL

1044

14%

34%

19%

28%

5%

48%

47%

AT

1000

6%

19%

34%

32%

9%

25%

66%

PL1000

7%

21%

39%

18%

15%

28%

57%

PT1000

7%

21%

27%

13%

32%

28%

40%

RO

1043

9%

20%

30%

16%

25%

29%

46%

SI

1008

6%

17%

33%

38%

6%

23%

71%

SK

1025

4%

17%

49%

23%

7%

21%

72%

FI1017

5%

26%

45%

19%

5%

31%

64%

SE

1017

4%

20%

32%

39%

5%

24%

71%

UK

1314

11%

33%

29%

16%

11%

44%

45%

HR

1000

4%

27%

32%

23%

14%

31%

55%

TR

1005

8%

14%

16%

25%

37%

22%

41%

MK

1009

16%

24%

19%

26%

15%

40%

45%

QE4.3

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.3

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

Les

émis

sions

de

CO

2 (

dio

xyde

carb

one/

gaz

car

boniq

ue)

n’o

nt

qu’u

n e

ffet

mar

gin

al s

ur

le c

han

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

Em

issi

on o

f CO

2 (

Car

bon d

ioxi

de)

has

only

a m

argin

al im

pac

t on c

limat

e ch

ange

TO

TA

L


Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree



Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree


UE27

EU

27

26718

17%

45%

16%

5%

17%

62%

21%

BE

1018

16%

48%

23%

5%

8%

64%

28%

BG

1000

13%

40%

10%

5%

32%

53%

15%

CZ

1050

14%

47%

24%

4%

11%

61%

28%

DK

1016

24%

47%

16%

4%

9%

71%

20%

D-W

1006

20%

46%

17%

6%

11%

66%

23%

DE

1523

21%

45%

17%

6%

11%

66%

23%

D-E

517

25%

42%

20%

6%

7%

67%

26%

EE

1003

12%

42%

26%

6%

14%

54%

32%

EL

1000

24%

50%

18%

5%

3%

74%

23%

ES

1003

14%

41%

11%

2%

32%

55%

13%

FR1035

16%

45%

19%

6%

14%

61%

25%

IE1000

19%

49%

9%

3%

20%

68%

12%

IT1060

18%

48%

13%

5%

16%

66%

18%

CY

504

40%

41%

4%

3%

12%

81%

7%

CY (

tcc)

500

19%

18%

12%

15%

36%

37%

27%

LV1001

8%

36%

27%

12%

17%

44%

39%

LT1010

9%

41%

20%

9%

21%

50%

29%

LU504

15%

48%

19%

8%

10%

63%

27%

HU

1023

14%

49%

17%

5%

15%

63%

22%

MT

500

14%

29%

9%

5%

43%

43%

14%

NL

1044

16%

36%

25%

10%

13%

52%

35%

AT

1000

21%

47%

16%

3%

13%

68%

19%

PL1000

12%

51%

14%

3%

20%

63%

17%

PT1000

14%

40%

12%

2%

32%

54%

14%

RO

1043

18%

34%

13%

7%

28%

52%

20%

SI

1008

29%

40%

15%

6%

10%

69%

21%

SK

1025

17%

55%

14%

4%

10%

72%

18%

FI1017

10%

46%

27%

6%

11%

56%

33%

SE

1017

29%

43%

11%

6%

11%

72%

17%

UK

1314

14%

47%

18%

5%

16%

61%

23%

HR

1000

16%

45%

13%

5%

21%

61%

18%

TR

1005

10%

19%

13%

17%

41%

29%

30%

MK

1009

21%

31%

13%

11%

24%

52%

24%

QE4.4

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.4

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

La lutt

e co

ntr

e le

chan

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

peu

t av

oir u

n e

ffet

posi

tif

sur

l’éco

nom

ie e

uro

pée

nne

Fighting c

limat

e ch

ange

can h

ave

a posi

tive

im

pac

t on t

he

Euro

pea

n e

conom

y

TO

TA

L


Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree



Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree


UE27

EU

27

26718

31%

44%

11%

4%

10%

75%

15%

BE

1018

28%

51%

15%

4%

2%

79%

19%

BG

1000

43%

39%

3%

1%

14%

82%

4%

CZ

1050

34%

49%

10%

2%

5%

83%

12%

DK

1016

53%

34%

7%

2%

4%

87%

9%

D-W

1006

29%

41%

18%

8%

4%

70%

26%

DE

1523

27%

41%

19%

9%

4%

68%

28%

D-E

517

20%

42%

20%

15%

3%

62%

35%

EE

1003

34%

45%

9%

4%

8%

79%

13%

EL

1000

38%

52%

7%

1%

2%

90%

8%

ES

1003

26%

47%

6%

1%

20%

73%

7%

FR1035

31%

41%

13%

6%

9%

72%

19%

IE1000

30%

43%

8%

3%

16%

73%

11%

IT1060

27%

44%

12%

4%

13%

71%

16%

CY

504

50%

28%

2%

1%

19%

78%

3%

CY (

tcc)

500

39%

19%

4%

5%

33%

58%

9%

LV1001

29%

49%

10%

2%

10%

78%

12%

LT1010

41%

43%

5%

1%

10%

84%

6%

LU504

20%

41%

20%

12%

7%

61%

32%

HU

1023

38%

46%

8%

2%

6%

84%

10%

MT

500

26%

38%

1%

2%

33%

64%

3%

NL

1044

45%

37%

9%

6%

3%

82%

15%

AT

1000

35%

44%

13%

4%

4%

79%

17%

PL1000

20%

53%

9%

2%

16%

73%

11%

PT1000

35%

37%

9%

1%

18%

72%

10%

RO

1043

40%

36%

6%

1%

17%

76%

7%

SI

1008

45%

41%

8%

2%

4%

86%

10%

SK

1025

33%

53%

7%

1%

6%

86%

8%

FI1017

28%

52%

12%

3%

5%

80%

15%

SE

1017

45%

38%

10%

5%

2%

83%

15%

UK

1314

29%

49%

9%

4%

9%

78%

13%

HR

1000

36%

45%

6%

3%

10%

81%

9%

TR

1005

22%

19%

8%

10%

41%

41%

18%

MK

1009

44%

27%

7%

3%

19%

71%

10%

QE4.5

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.5

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

Des

car

bura

nts

alter

nat

ifs

tels

que

les

"bio

carb

ura

nts

" dev

raie

nt

être

utilis

és p

our

réduire

les

émis

sions

de

gaz

à e

ffet

de

serr

eAlter

nat

ive

fuel

s, s

uch

as

"bio

fuel

s",

should

be

use

d t

o r

educe

gre

enhouse

gas

em

issi

ons

TO

TA

L


Totally agree

Plutôt d’accord/

Tend to agree



Totally disagree

NSP/DK

D'accord/Agree


UE27

EU

27

26718

15%

44%

22%

12%

7%

59%

34%

BE

1018

15%

49%

22%

13%

1%

64%

35%

BG

1000

3%

17%

22%

37%

21%

20%

59%

CZ

1050

11%

43%

32%

10%

4%

54%

42%

DK

1016

20%

43%

22%

12%

3%

63%

34%

D-W

1006

19%

43%

22%

14%

2%

62%

36%

DE

1523

18%

44%

22%

14%

2%

62%

36%

D-E

517

14%

47%

23%

15%

1%

61%

38%

EE

1003

9%

35%

28%

21%

7%

44%

49%

EL

1000

14%

44%

32%

10%

- 58%

42%

ES

1003

19%

52%

18%

8%

3%

71%

26%

FR1035

15%

43%

22%

18%

2%

58%

40%

IE1000

20%

54%

13%

4%

9%

74%

17%

IT1060

10%

45%

23%

9%

13%

55%

32%

CY

504

17%

33%

24%

22%

4%

50%

46%

CY (

tcc)

500

19%

25%

9%

24%

23%

44%

33%

LV1001

5%

28%

28%

31%

8%

33%

59%

LT1010

5%

29%

30%

28%

8%

34%

58%

LU504

25%

47%

18%

8%

2%

72%

26%

HU

1023

10%

36%

36%

14%

4%

46%

50%

MT

500

18%

55%

13%

6%

8%

73%

19%

NL

1044

15%

47%

18%

18%

2%

62%

36%

AT

1000

20%

45%

21%

7%

7%

65%

28%

PL1000

8%

40%

26%

11%

15%

48%

37%

PT1000

10%

42%

28%

10%

10%

52%

38%

RO

1043

10%

24%

27%

17%

22%

34%

44%

SI

1008

25%

52%

16%

4%

3%

77%

20%

SK

1025

9%

42%

31%

9%

9%

51%

40%

FI1017

12%

50%

27%

9%

2%

62%

36%

SE

1017

28%

54%

11%

6%

1%

82%

17%

UK

1314

24%

53%

13%

6%

4%

77%

19%

HR

1000

8%

31%

27%

25%

9%

39%

52%

TR

1005

8%

22%

21%

29%

20%

30%

50%

MK

1009

12%

24%

20%

27%

17%

36%

47%

QE4.6

Pour

chac

une

des

affirm

atio

ns

suiv

ante

s,ve

uill

ezm

edire

sivo

us

êtes

tout

àfa

itd’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

d’a

ccord

,plu

tôt

pas

d’a

ccord

ou p

as d

u t

out

d’a

ccord

. Q

E4.6

For

each

of

the

follo

win

gst

atem

ents

,ple

ase

tell

me

whet

her

you

tota

llyag

ree,

tend

toag

ree,

tend

todis

agre

eor

tota

llydis

agre

e.

Vous

avez

per

sonnel

lem

ent

pris

des

act

ions

pour

contr

ibuer

à la

lutt

e co

ntr

e le

chan

gem

ent

clim

atiq

ue

You p

erso

nal

ly h

ave

take

n a

ctio

ns

aim

ed a

t hel

pin

g t

o f

ight

clim

ate

chan

ge

europeans’ attitudes towards climate...

Documents