the changing global economic map
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Changing Global Economic Map
Trade vs production
0
50
100
150
200
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
year
199
5=10
0 exportsproductionworld gdp
1980
2000
Manufacturing value added
→
2
3
4
5
Changes
The rise of Japan to become second biggest economy ($4.7 trillion), (US $11.7 trillion) (China $1.9 trillion) (Canada $1.0 trillion)Continued dominance of US as largest economyUneven economic performance of Western European economies
Emergence of a number of newly industrializing economies in East AsiaRecent and rapid emergence of China as a major player in world economyWeak performance of most Latin American economiesAppearance of transitional economies in Central Europe
Outsourcing
Offshoring vs OutsourcingFeatures of high probability of out-sourcing
No face to face contact requiredHigh information contentThe work process is telecommunicable and internet enabledHigh wage differentials with similar occupations in destination countryLow set-up barriersLow social networking requirements
6
IT Jobs to India
Outsourcing Woes
You can read the transcript on the course website
7
Job Outsourcing Benefits
8
Captive offshoring
Why keep it in house?Control of activity is considered critical
High transaction costsProprietary expensive tacit knowledge
Communication difficultiesRequires close interaction
Unavailability of capable local firmsLarger scale activities are more likely to be kept
Difficult to achieve economies of scale
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)Foreign Direct Investment
9
Portfolio Investment
The key is that control must be exercised, if not, then it is portfolio investment
Current FDI
Rankings by Inward FDI Performance Index 2001-03
10
Front-runners: countries with high FDI potential and performance.
Above potential: countries with low FDI potential but strong FDI performance.
Below potential: countries with high FDI potential but low FDI performance.
Under-performers: countries with both low FDI potential and performance.
Under-performers
Above-potentialLow FDI potential
Below potentialFront-runnersHigh FDI potential
Low FDI Performance
High FDI performance
FDI potential 1999-2001
0.445Finland100.454Netherlands90.454Belgium and Luxembourg80.455Sweden70.457Germany60.481Canada50.489United Kingdom40.489Norway30.490Singapore20.689United States1
11
In 1999-2001 countries performing below potential included such major industrial countries as Australia, Italy, Japan and the United States, and such newly industrializing economies as the Republic of Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan. The group also includes the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, all countries with enormous resource bases that should be able to attract greater direct investment.
The above-potential group includes Brazil, which scores poorly on recent growth, export shares and skill creation. The underperformers include all the South Asian economies and many poor and least developed countries, along with Turkey, with a weak record on risk and FDI stock.
12
Sectors that Attract FDI
Large TNC involvementTechnologically more advanced sectors –pharmaceuticals, computers, synthetic fibers
Large volume, medium technology consumer goods – TVs, autos, appliances
Mass-production consumer goods industries supplying branded products- soft drinks, cereals, cigarettes
Recent changes
Service industries has had most significant relative changeConcentrated in a few sectors
Financial servicesTrade-related servicesTelecommunication services
13
Developed World
US still the dominant destination for FDIEurope is a major destinationJapan still has an imbalance between outward and inward, outward far larger
14
Meso-scale ViewEurope’s
growthaxis
15