test three mean: 82.84 grade distribution, test 3 average: 83.9

12
Test Three 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 60 61 65 66 70 71 75 76 80 81 85 86 90 91 95 96 100 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Upload: lambert-campbell

Post on 25-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Test Three

Mean: 82.84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

60 61 65 66 70 71 75 76 80 81 85 86 90 91 95 96 100

Grade Distribution, Test 3

Average: 83.9

Page 2: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Cumulative Distribution

Cumulative Mean: 80.76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

65 66 70 71 75 76 80 81 85 86 90 91 95

Average: 82.8

Page 3: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Global Poverty II

Lecture 23

Page 4: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

The New International Economic Order,1973-1982

The Oil Shock and Commodity PowerCommodity Power Leads to Demands for The New International Economic Order (NIEO) Increase LDC

Manufacturing to 25% of Total World Manufacturing by 2000

LDCs Manufactured about 9% in 1978

Specific Demands:Increase LDC Control of Natural ResourcesCheaper and Easier Access to Northern TechnologyIncreased Foreign Aid (.7% of North’s GNP)Eliminate LDC DebtGreater Influence over IMF and World Bank

Page 5: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

The Shift to Market-Based Liberalism, 1982-2001

“The Poor are Poor Because They Are Inefficient.”Development Requires Societies to Allocate Their Resources to those Activities that Yield the Highest Possible Return.Best Achieved By Allowing Markets to Make Decisions About Resource Allocation.By Relying Upon the Government Rather than the Market to Allocate Resources under ISI, Developing Countries Realized a Smaller Return on their Resources Than They Would Have Realized Had Markets Played the Central Role.

Page 6: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Inefficient Resource Use Under ISI

Over-Taxed Productive Sector (Agriculture).Agricultural Production Fell as Consequence.Exports Fell Because Agriculture was Most Important Export.Food Imports Rose.Government Revenues Fell.Ghana and Cocoa as an Example.

Over-Subsidized Un-Productive Sectors (Manufacturing).Manufacturing Was Too Capital Intensive.Factories Ran at 50% of Capacity.Goods Were Not Competitive in International Market.Ghana and Fruit Processing as an Example.

Page 7: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Rent Seeking

Government Permits Required For All Imports.Government Does Not Satisfy All Requests for Import Permits.Import Permits Are Therefore Valuable: People Holding Import Permits Can Buy Goods at Low World

Prices, Sell Them at Home at Higher Domestic Prices, and Pocket the Difference.

The Price Difference is A “Rent”—An Above Market Return.People Dedicate Their Lives to Capturing the Rents Created By This System. They Become “Rent Seekers.”Consequences of This SystemBureaucratic DelayBribery and Corruption in Government Agencies: A Market for PermitsMisallocation of Productive Resources

Page 8: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Strong StatesImport Substitution Required A Strong StateStrong States Are Risky“Good” Dictators Use State Power For Public Good Extract Resources From One Sector and Invest

Them in Other Productive Sectors“Bad” Dictators Use State Power For Their Own Gain Extract Resources From One Sector and Spend

Them on Palaces, Private Jets, Pink Champagne, and Perfume Baths (e.g., Mobutu in Zaire)

Temptation to Use State Power to Own Profit Appears Hard to Resist

Page 9: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Liberalism AscendantSince Late 1980s Developing Country Governments Have Embraced Liberal Development StrategiesDismantle ISI at Home Sell Government-Owned Industries Stop Taxing Agriculture to Subsidize Manufacturing

Embrace Liberal International Trade Reduce Tariffs and Liberalize Imports Target Export Sectors for Development Join “Free Trade Areas”

A 180 Degree Turn in Development Strategy

Page 10: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Figure 4.1: Average Tariffs, Developing Countries

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

1980 1985 1990 1995

Per

cen

t

Source: World Bank

Page 11: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Why the 180?

ISI Running Out of Steam By Early 1970s.Success of East Asian NICs Suggests the Viability of Alternative Strategy.The Debt Crisis and Northern Control Over Financial Flows.A Realist Perspective on the Last Fifty Years of North-South Relations.

Page 12: Test Three Mean: 82.84 Grade Distribution, Test 3 Average: 83.9

Who Is Right?Structuralists Have a Point Life in Global Capitalist System is Difficult for Developing

Countries Vulnerable to Terms of Trade Shocks LDC Industries Can’t Easily Compete Against Core Country Firms.

Structuralists Exaggerate Degree to Which Poverty is Caused by Capitalist System

Liberals Have a Point Government Policy Did Make Things Worse Rather Than

Better in Most Countries. Liberals Exaggerate Degree to Which and the Speed at

Which Markets Will Raise Incomes in Developing Countries.