tesol2015mwispanel_crossing

60
MWIS Academic Session TESOL 2015 Publishers obviously aim to produce excellent books which will satisfy the needs of their users but their need to maximize profits makes them cautious and conservative and any compromise with the authors tends to still be biased towards perceived market needs rather than the actual needs and wants of the learners. (Tomlinson, 2014) Publishers obviously aim to produce excellent books which will satisfy the needs of their users but their need to maximize profits makes them cautious and conservative and any compromise with the authors tends to still be biased towards perceived market needs rather than the actual needs and wants of the learners. (Tomlinson, 2014) 1

Upload: eric-h-roth

Post on 16-Jul-2015

143 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MWIS Academic Session TESOL 2015

Publishers obviously aim to produce excellent books which will satisfy the needs of their users but their need to

maximize profits makes them cautious and conservative and any

compromise with the authors tends to still be biased towards perceived

market needs rather than the actual needs and wants of the learners.

(Tomlinson, 2014)

Publishers obviously aim to produce excellent books which will satisfy the needs of their users but their need to

maximize profits makes them cautious and conservative and any

compromise with the authors tends to still be biased towards perceived

market needs rather than the actual needs and wants of the learners.

(Tomlinson, 2014)

1

Crossing into Crossing into New Materials Writing TerritoryNew Materials Writing Territory

MWIS Academic Session • TESOL 2015 2

Steve Jones

Community College of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

Jayme Adelson-Goldstein

Lighthearted Learning, Northridge CA

Eric Roth

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Christina Cavage, ModeratorSavannah College of Art and DesignSavannah, Georgia

3

WHO ARE WE?

4

Sources of informationfor this preliminary study

• A small number for interviews with practitioners in higher ed and adult settings

• A small number of interviews with publishing and program decision-makers

• A small (but growing) set of survey responses

5

What we’re not claiming

“I'm concerned about the validity of your data using this survey instrument. Please make sure to state that when/if you present any ‘findings’”.

6

OUR AGENDA

7

OUR KEY QUESTIONSOUR KEY QUESTIONS

How do publishers and authors set the

teaching agenda for ELT materials?

How do publishers and authors set the

teaching agenda for ELT materials?

ReflectReflect ShareShare

8

Surveys Focus groups

(regional, national, international)

School site interviews with school coordinators & teachers

Classroom observations

Phone interviews with survey respondents

Shaping the Agenda

9

Sales rep reports (national and global)

Research company’s surveys & focus groups

Review of research in professional journals

Web research on ELT trends and funding

Competition analysis

Website analytics

Shaping the Agenda

10

THOUGHTS FROM…

Pietro Alongi Publishing Director, Pearson Education Jeff Krum Associate Publishing Director, Cambridge University Press

Sharon Sargent Publisher, Oxford University Press

Pietro Alongi Publishing Director, Pearson Education Jeff Krum Associate Publishing Director, Cambridge University Press

Sharon Sargent Publisher, Oxford University Press 11

How does the publisher view research?

Sharon Sargent

We keep the research ‘present’ during writing, editing, and production (and digital testing) [by not being] afraid of what we may uncover.

Every project at Oxford has a research plan from the very beginning.

12

How does the publisher view research?

...much in the way a GPS will redirect you if you take a wrong turn (or two) along the way.

• an ongoing process

• a feedback loop

• continuously informs the

creation of the product• confirms the project is going in the right direction

Pietro Alongi13

Ideals • Change • Academia

Distracted Students • Underfunded Programs

Market Research-what works

-doing the best you can

with what you have-the way English “is actually taught”

How does the publisher view research?

Academic Research

- best practice

- theory- the way English “should be taught.”

Jeff Krum 14

VISION

DNA

VIRTUOUS

CIRCLE

15

“Whatever you decide is a gamble, but when your work is research-based, then it’s an educated and well-thought out gamble.” - Sharon

16

Tomlinson’s Framework

Collection of texts that engageDevelopment of practice materials

17

RESEARCH VS THE REAL WORLD

“Names” in the field approached to be the face of the book but without

the ability to impact the content of the book as much having their name

on the book implies to the users.

18

RESEARCH VS THE REAL WORLD

The “BETA” concept

“We’ll fix it in the reprint”

“We’ll fix it in the next edition.”

“It’s easy to go in and make the fix digitally.”

19

Multilevel

Writing paragraphsfor beginners

Blackline masters

Complex text

20

Authorial AnecdoteAUTHOR CAMPAIGN: teach paragraph writing in low beginning text

Academic Research Market Research

Paragraph writing at the beginning level is appropriate and

needed.

Teachers of low-beginning learners say learners are not ready to write paragraphs.

RESULT: No paragraph writing in level 1

Do you have any materials that help

beginning-level learners write paragraphs?

A few years later…

21

Open Educational ResourcesOER are teaching, learning, and research resources that reside in the public domain or have been released under an intellectual property license that permits sharing, accessing, repurposing—including for commercial purposes—and collaborating with others.

22

At the heart of sustainable change is developing and helping people to build up an “inner resilience” that guards them from experiencing every change that comes their way as disruptive.

Jennifer Vanek Open Educational Resources:

New Technologies and New Ways of Learning

Minnetesol Journal

24

A CONSIDERATION• The size of the gap between authors’

conception and teachers’ use relates to how much staff development is provided when programs or teachers adopt a book

25

OUR KEY QUESTIONSOUR KEY QUESTIONS

What are explicit and implicit assumptions

embedded in materials?

What are explicit and implicit assumptions

embedded in materials?

ReflectReflect ShareShare

26

27

Assumptions

•What are they? (still under study)•Are they valid? (requires study)•If not, what alternatives would their adjustment lead us to?

28

Assumption

Materials must postulate a level of background knowledge of all potential students on each content topic.

29

What alternatives exist?

•Create meta-materials that help teachers assess and then build background knowledge specific to their students’ needs.

30

Assumption

Materials must not include content about certain sensitive topics.

31

What alternatives exist?

•Examine the need for self-censorship.•Create materials that assume there is student access to uncensored content.•Develop national versions of materials

32

Assumption

Materials play a role in professional development for untrained or inexperienced teachers.

33

What alternatives exist?

•Produce separate professional development materials be developed, on various “levels,” for teachers.•Should a flexible menu of materials include choices about “levels" for teachers as well as students?

34

Assumption

There is a specific order in which activities should be organized, based on a theory of learning.

35

What alternatives exist?

• Materials that do not assume which activities are done outside of class and which are done in class, and allow teachers to choose the order and setting.

36

Assumption

Materials must provide a fixed set of presentations and activities to meet the curricular needs of programs.

37

What alternatives exist?

• Make available a flexible menu of materials from which teachers (and students) could select, reflecting personal styles, interests, sensibilities.

38

Assumption

Students are tech-savvy and have access to technology that allows them to interact online.

39

Assumptions• Materials must postulate a level of background knowledge of

all potential students on each content topic.• Materials must not include content about certain sensitive

topics. • Materials play a role in professional development for

untrained or inexperienced teachers.• There is a specific order in which activities should be

organized, based on a theory of learning.• Materials must provide a fixed set of presentations and

activities to meet the curricular needs of programs.• Students are tech-savvy and have access to technology that

allows them to interact online.

40

OUR KEY QUESTIONSOUR KEY QUESTIONS

How do English teachers add,

subtract, change, and ignore textbooks to

meet student needs?

How do English teachers add,

subtract, change, and ignore textbooks to

meet student needs?

ReflectReflect ShareShare

41

Textbooks

• Textbooks remain a double edged sword.

• Many contexts lead to many teacher responses in post-method ESL/EFL classrooms.

http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/z7c/axj/z7caxjpTA.jpeg

42

Graph showing increase in ELLs in Globally.

• By 2000 – 750 million English as

Foreign Language Speakers.

– 350 million English as Second Language Speakers.

43

revolutioninlearning.wordpress.com

ESL and ELLs Statistics• An estimate of over 1

billion people are learning English worldwide.

• http://esl.about.com/od/englishlearningresources/f/f_eslmarket.htm

• That’s approximately the population of US + Mexico + Canada --- doubled!

www.commerce.gov

44

http://worldpress.org/images/maps/world_600w.jpg

English Classrooms Differ

45

Context Counts: Few Major Publishers and Many More English Classes and Teachers

46

Seeking Teacher Responses to Textbook Challenges

http://johnkyo.deviantart.com/art/No-Originality-192662864

47

Survey Results and Highlights

• 65% chose their own textbooks• 100% modified the textbook

material • 80% alter the time for

assignments• 74 % restate directions • 65 % expand on directions• 60% provide additional directions

for multilevel classes• 45% read author introductions• 45 % skip materials due to time

constraintswww.nicwebdesign.com

48

Question # 3 Summary

• Who made the decision about the adoption of this material?

49

Adaptions and Modifications

• Modifications included:• Skip chapters • Modify the chapters.• Refocus material • Rearrange chapters• Create new materials to augment chapters• Find additional materials to supplement

textbooks

50

Question # 2 Summary

Answer Choices Responses

integrated skills 40.00% 8

composition/writing 15.00% 3

reading 5.00% 1

grammar 10.00% 2

oral communication 20.00% 4

listening 20.00% 4

other 25.00% 5

51

English Teachers Feel Free to Go Beyond Author’s Intentions and Structures

• 55% ignore • “I prefer to adapt material to fit the needs of the learners.

This may mean that the organization of the content, etc. will be changed in some way, perhaps expanded upon or removed. As a result, the author's intent may be less relevant. That said, I do later look through these sections for new ideas and information.”

• “Quite honestly, I find most textbooks, at this point in my career, not particularly well written, at least those with an older copyright. Corpus data is rarely included, vocabulary isn't correlated with the academic work list, critical thinking skills are rarely incorporated, and explanations are often convoluted. I use the text as a springboard to deeper activities and tend to generate most of my own materials.”

52

Solutions for Teachers; Applications for Material Writers

• “Begin with the end in mind.” – Ancient Greek proverb• Consider classroom context • Focus on student needs and wants• Consider explicitly encouraging adapting ESOL

materials to better fit actual students in class• Build flexible, stand-alone assignments • Provide a range of recommended time for assignments• Deploy authentic, outside materials to supplement

textbook gaps and limits

53

English Teachers Want Some Autonomy From ESOL Textbooks

“I am not a page-turner; I’m a creative educator.”

Katherine C. Guevara 54

Moving away from this…

55

to more of this…

56

Continuing the Conversation: Web Resources

• Tuzi, F, “Adopting & Adapting Textbooks for an ESL Curriculum”. YouTube. YouTube, LLC, 5 June 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq9ywxu6Wao

• Tuzi, F, “Adopting A ESL Textbook in ESL Curriculum”. YouTube. YouTube LLC, 17 July 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPuV3utKKe8

• Terrell, Shelly, TESOL Institute, American, “10 Ways to Adapt a Course Book into your Classroom”. YouTube. YouTube LLC, 20 March 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OTB8sJe-nE

• Like Them or Not: Making Textbooks Work for you. Caraveo, Priscilla, Guevara, Katherine, 2013.

• http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej26/f1.html• http://www.edutopia.org/blog/esl-ell-tips-ferlazzo-sypnieski• House, Dayna, “Adapting the English Textbook to Students Needs”. 3 December

2012http://www.slideshare.net/EmbajadaEEUUenArgentina/adapting-the-english-textbook-to-students-needs

• eHow Contributor, “How to Adapt Textbook Activities in an ESL Class”, 2015.http://www.ehow.com/how_4481192_adapt-textbook-activities-esl-class.html

• Xerri, Daniel, “Experimenting with Dogme in a Mainstream ESL Context”, 25 July 2012http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/viewFile/19189/12673

• Pinard, Lizzie, “2 Simple ideas for adapting your course book” 30 November 2014.http://reflectiveteachingreflectivelearning.com/2014/11/30/2-simple-ideas-for-adapting-your-course-book/

• "Innovation in ESL and EFL Textbooks." Innovation in ESL and EFL• Ferlazzo, Larry. "Do's & Don'ts For Teaching English-Language Learners." Edutopia. N.p., 12 Mar.

2012. Web. 30 Mar. 2015.• Roth, Eric H. "Why Are So Many EFL Textbooks So Bland, Boring, and Culturally Tone Deaf?"

Compelling Conversations. N.p., 28 Sept. 2011. Web. 20 Mar. 2015.• teachingasleadership.org/.../HistoryofESLandBilingualEducation.doc, Date and Author Unknown.• revolutioninlearning.wordpress.com• http://worldpress.org/images/maps/world_600w.jpg

57

Acknowledgments

• Pricilla Caraveo• Barry Griner• Katherine C. Guevara• Danny Hackin• James Polk• Survey Respondents• USC Center for Scholarly Technology• Mark Treston• Brent Warner

58

Thank You!!Questions, Comments

59

Contact Information• Christina Cavage, [email protected]• Jayme Adelson-Goldstein,

[email protected]

• Steve Jones, stjones@gmailcom• Eric Roth, [email protected]

60