ten questions for the muslim next door

8/3/2019 Ten Questions for the Muslim Next Door

1/20

Ten Questions for the Muslim Next Door

April 30, 2009: Also read my new review of Reza Aslan'sHow to Win a Cosmic War

By KamalaDecember 5, 2008

The November/December 2008 issue of Stanford

University's alumni magazine featuresa story about

Stanford grad and author Sumbul Ali-Karamali.She has just published her first book, a guide to

Islam that she wrote in part because bookstores

only carried "dry textbooks," "the occasional slim

volume of Sufi poetry," andafter 9/11"tomeson terrorism and the 'clash of civilizations.'"

Her book,The Muslim Next Door: The Qur'an, the

Media, and that Veil thing, is in part an effort toavert a "clash of ignorances" because the "Western

perception of Islam has become an evil caricature of

reality." As she writes, "moderate Muslims try tochip away a great wall of media misinformation."

The book aims to"clear away the misconceptions

about Islam,"explaining why these "tall tales" continue to "flourish" and "persist."

Ali-Karamali seems well suited to write such a book. A Muslim of Indian descent, she has a

law degree from the University of California, Davis in addition to her undergraduatedegree from Stanford, and a graduate degree in Islamic law from the University of London.

Yet she's all-American: she grew up in California, she's married, she's a mother, and she

practiced corporate law in San Francisco.

The book has received praise from some big names.

Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl, Professor of Islamic Law at the UCLA School of Law, calls it"one of the best three books published on the Islamic faith in the English language since

the tragedy of 9/11." It's "refreshing in its honesty" and "consistently reliable." (Aweb site

run by El Fadl's "Students, Supporters, and Friends" describes him as "the most

important intellectual in Islam and Islamic law today." Among other honors, he was"appointed by President George W. Bush as a commissioner on the US Commission on

International Religious Freedom.")

Reza Aslan, the"internationally acclaimed"author ofNo God but Godand guest on the

Jon Stewart show,calls her"beautiful book" a "corrective" against the "misinformation

about Islam" that "most Americans are bombarded with."
http://revuse.wetpaint.com/page/Book+Review%3A+How+to+Win+a+Cosmic+Warhttp://revuse.wetpaint.com/page/Book+Review%3A+How+to+Win+a+Cosmic+Warhttp://revuse.wetpaint.com/page/Book+Review%3A+How+to+Win+a+Cosmic+Warhttp://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.scholarofthehouse.org/abscholofhou.htmlhttp://www.scholarofthehouse.org/abscholofhou.htmlhttp://www.scholarofthehouse.org/abscholofhou.htmlhttp://www.rezaaslan.com/bio.htmlhttp://www.rezaaslan.com/bio.htmlhttp://www.rezaaslan.com/bio.htmlhttp://www.amazon.com/No-god-but-God-Evolution/dp/1400062136http://www.amazon.com/No-god-but-God-Evolution/dp/1400062136http://www.amazon.com/No-god-but-God-Evolution/dp/1400062136http://www.rezaaslan.com/tv/TDS_apr05_100.htmlhttp://www.rezaaslan.com/tv/TDS_apr05_100.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.rezaaslan.com/tv/TDS_apr05_100.htmlhttp://www.amazon.com/No-god-but-God-Evolution/dp/1400062136http://www.rezaaslan.com/bio.htmlhttp://www.scholarofthehouse.org/abscholofhou.htmlhttp://www.muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.muslimnextdoor.com/http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/novdec/show/islam.htmlhttp://revuse.wetpaint.com/page/Book+Review%3A+How+to+Win+a+Cosmic+War


2/20

According to Dr. Carole Hillenbrand, Professor of Islamic History at the University ofEdinburgh, The Muslim Next Door is "refreshingly frank."

The book's back coverasks, "What if you could sit down at a kitchen table with anAmerican Muslim mom and ask anything you wanted about her faith and religious

practice?" In the book's acknowledgments, she writes: "And to everyone who ever askedme a well-intentioned question about Islam: this book is a result of your desire to cross

cultures."

I am very glad that Ms. Ali-Karamali is open to well-intentioned questions.

Because after reading the book, I still have a few.

Ten, in fact.

I hope she'll answer them.

Muhammad's Wife Aisha

Ali-Karamali writes that Aisha (Aysha) was "the one virgin Muhammad married... She

was contracted to the Prophet at a young age, given variously as somewhere between nine

to twelve years. However, the marriage was a formality and unconsummated until she was

well past puberty. The sources variously cite her as somewhere between twelve andsixteen..." (p. 143, emphasis added)

Ali-Karamali writes, "Aysha's youth seems to have apparently appalled some non-

Muslims, much to my surprise," and goes on to explain that it is "unreasonable to beshocked" because it was "consummated only after she was past puberty." In the seventh

century, "puberty meant adulthood."

But Al-Tabari, described by Ali-Karamali herself as an "early Muslim scholar" and a

"highly respected luminar[y] in Islam,"quotes Aisha as having said, "The Messenger of

God married me when I was seven; my marriage was consummated when I was nine."(emphasis added)

Consider also the writings of al-Bukhari, whoseSahih Al-Bukhariis "universally

acknowledged as the most authentic book after the Qur'an" according toan article at

IslamOnline,a web site co-founded by Yusuf al-Qaradawi. (Ali-Karamali calls Qaradawi a"leading Muslim scholar." (p. 220))

Bukhari writes, "the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummatedhis marriage when she was nine years old." (emphasis added)

Alsoaccording to Bukhari, Aisha herself said:
http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565http://books.google.com/books?id=3bhWsAKYDscC&pg=PA170http://books.google.com/books?id=3bhWsAKYDscC&pg=PA170http://books.google.com/books?id=3bhWsAKYDscC&pg=PA170http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-476/_nr-363/i.htmlhttp://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-476/_nr-363/i.htmlhttp://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-476/_nr-363/i.htmlhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/062.sbt.html#007.062.064http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/062.sbt.html#007.062.064http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/058.sbt.html#005.058.234http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/058.sbt.html#005.058.234http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/058.sbt.html#005.058.234http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/058.sbt.html#005.058.234http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/062.sbt.html#007.062.064http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-476/_nr-363/i.htmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1158658456422&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/http://books.google.com/books?id=3bhWsAKYDscC&pg=PA170http://www.writtenvoices.com/titlepage.asp?ISBN=0974524565


3/20

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-

al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother,

Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I

went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the

door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and

rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari

women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and

they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my

mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.(emphasis added)

Andfrom Bukhari once more, Aisha also said:

I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me.

When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would

call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was

allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page

143, Vol.13)

(Note that the parenthesized and emphasized comment is from Fateh-al-Bari (Fath al-

Bari), the"most celebrated"commentary on Bukhari's book.)

In June of this year, a Saudi"Marriage Officiant" wasinterviewed on Lebanese

television: "The Prophet

Muhammad is the model wefollow. He took 'Aisha to be his

wife when she was six, but he

had sex with her only when she

was nine.'" His interviewer did

not contest this statement. Thetranscript ishereand the video

ishere.

Similarly, Dr. Abd Al-Hamid

Al-'Ubeidispokeon Iraqitelevision in March and

defended Muhammad for

having sex with a nine-year-old:

Many criminals, the enemies of Islam, ask: "How could the Prophet Muhammad, at 52 years of age, marry

'Aisha when she was only 8 years old, and consummate the marriage when she was 9 years old?" I say to

them: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Why do you permit your young girls tofornicate? They consider it one of their liberties.

To be sure, Aisha's age at the time of marriage and consummation is today a sensitive

and in some circles, contestedtopic.

Why?
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/073.sbt.html#008.073.151http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/073.sbt.html#008.073.151http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/073.sbt.html#008.073.151http://www.sunnah.org/history/Scholars/fath_al_bari.htmhttp://www.sunnah.org/history/Scholars/fath_al_bari.htmhttp://www.sunnah.org/history/Scholars/fath_al_bari.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1725.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1725.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1725.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1725.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1798.htmhttp://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1798.htmhttp://www.sunnah.org/history/Scholars/fath_al_bari.htmhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/073.sbt.html#008.073.151


4/20

Ali-Karamali writes, "Muslimsrevere Muhammad as the

embodiment of goodness and

human perfection." (p. 34)Muhammad is "the person

whose behavior every Muslimstrives to emulate." (p. 59,

emphasis added) As IbrahimHooper (spokesman of the

Council on American-Islamic

Relations)once wrote, "AsMuslims, we need to ... ask

ourselves, 'What would the

Prophet Muhammad do?'"

Some Muslimsquestion the

accuracyof Bukhari's above-mentioned hadith (traditions) and/or cite other hadith that suggest different ages. Even so,as Hwaa Irfanwrote in 2004 on Qaradawi's IslamOnline site, such an argument is a

"challenge" to the "true records that are referred to by Muslims for guidance," writing

that "one of the foremost records depended upon is the collection of hadiths of Prophet

Muhammad in the Sahih of Al-Bukhari." Irfan then proceeds to cite yet two moreexamples from Bukhari (beyond the three mentioned above) stating that Aisha was nine at

the age of consummation.

Here is my first question for Ms. Ali-Karamali:

1. According to many Islamic scholars past and presentincluding a scholar you mention

and praise in your book, Aisha's marriage was consummated at the age of nine. Why didyou write that "the sources variously cite her as somewhere between twelve and sixteen"?

The Definition of the Word "Islam"

Ali-Karamali writes, "Islam has two meanings in Arabic: 'submission' and 'peace'." (p. 33)

The first definition is not in doubt. But according to the Muslim Student Association at

USC, defining Islam as "peace" is number one on their list ofTen Misconceptions AboutIslam:

Misconception 1: Islam is 'the religion of peace' because: the Arabic word Islam is derived from the Arabic

word "Al-Salaam" which means peace.

The explanation:

It might seem strange to think of this as a misconception, but in fact it is. The root word of Islam is "al-silm"

which means "submission" or "surrender." It is understood to mean "submission to Allah." In spite of

whatever noble intention has caused many a Muslim to claim that Islam is derived primarily from peace, this
http://www.knowtheprophet.com/letter/hooper.htmhttp://www.knowtheprophet.com/letter/hooper.htmhttp://www.knowtheprophet.com/letter/hooper.htmhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996016332&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamEhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996016332&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamEhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996016332&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamEhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1725.htmhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html#HEADING1http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1123996016332&pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamEhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htmhttp://www.knowtheprophet.com/letter/hooper.htm


5/20

is not true... A secondary root of Islam may be "Al-Salaam" (peace), however the text of the Qur'an makes it

clear that Allah has clearly intended the focus of this way of life to be submission to Him.

As further evidence, consider the bookWar and Peace in the

Law of Islamby Majid Khadduri. Ali-Karamali cites this bookas a reference nine times in her chapter titled "Jihad and

Fundamentalism." Khadduriwrites simplythat Islam "means'surrender' or 'submission' to Allah's will." No mention of"peace." (He also happens to describe Islam as a "conquering

nation with world domination as its ultimate aim," but that's

another matter.)

The Qur'an itself refers to the word "Islam" several times,

including verses2.132,2.133,2.136,2.208,3.85,3.102,43.69,

and46.15. In English versions of the Qur'an, sometimes theword is translated into English, and sometimes it's left as

"Islam." Yet every time it is translated, it's translated into some form of "submission" or

"surrender", even in theMuhammad Asad translationthat Ali-Karamali quotes from.

Hence the next question for Ms. Ali-Karamali:

2. Which Islamic or Arabic scholars have translated the word "Islam" as "peace"?

Timothy McVeigh

Ali-Karamali mentions Timothy McVeigh onten different pages of her book. She argues

that "connecting jihad with deplorable crimes like September 11th makes no more sense

than connecting the Christian doctrine of holy war with TimothyMcVeigh's bombing of the Murrah Federal Building." (p.186) She

writes that McVeigh "bombed the Oklahoma Federal Building

pursuant to the dictates of his Christian fundamentalist beliefs." (p.105)

But ina CNN interview in 2001, Lou Michel, co-author ofAmericanTerrorist: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing,said

"McVeigh is agnostic. He doesn't believe in God, but he won't rule

out the possibility." Michel and co-author Dan Herbeck write that

McVeighwould tell friends, "Science is my religion."Michel also

saidthat McVeigh "didn't accept Jesus Christ as his personalSavior, so far as I know."

The UK Guardian reportedthat McVeigh wrote to the Buffalo News saying he was an

"agnostic."

In aletter McVeigh wrote to Fox Newson April 6, 2001, he begins by writing, "I explain

herein why I bombed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City." He writes that the
http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIC&pg=PA8http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIC&pg=PA8http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIC&pg=PA8http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.132http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.132http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.132http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.133http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.133http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.133http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.136http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.136http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.136http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.208http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.208http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.208http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.085http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.085http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.085http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.102http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.102http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.102http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/043.qmt.html#043.069http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/043.qmt.html#043.069http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/043.qmt.html#043.069http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/046.qmt.html#046.015http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/046.qmt.html#046.015http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/046.qmt.html#046.015http://www.geocities.com/masad02/http://www.geocities.com/masad02/http://www.geocities.com/masad02/http://www.cnn.com/COMMUNITY/transcripts/2001/04/04/michelherbeck/http://www.cnn.com/COMMUNITY/transcripts/2001/04/04/michelherbeck/http://www.cnn.com/COMMUNITY/transcripts/2001/04/04/michelherbeck/http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jun/11/mcveigh.usa4http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jun/11/mcveigh.usa4http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,17500,00.htmlhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,17500,00.htmlhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,17500,00.htmlhttp://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,17500,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jun/11/mcveigh.usa4http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jun/11/mcveigh.usa4http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1189http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072http://www.cnn.com/COMMUNITY/transcripts/2001/04/04/michelherbeck/http://www.geocities.com/masad02/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/046.qmt.html#046.015http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/043.qmt.html#043.069http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.102http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.085http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.208http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.136http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.133http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.132http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIC&pg=PA8http://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIChttp://books.google.com/books?id=UHWd6gLZsFIC


6/20

bombing was a "counter attack, for the cumulative raids ... that federal agents hadparticipated in over the preceding years." He sought to "correct the abuse of power we

were seeing in federal actions against citizens." But nowhere does he mention Christianity

or Christian beliefs.

(As one example of contrast, Osama bin Laden's 1996Declaration of War against Americamentions "Allah" over 100 times and cites 16 verses of the Qur'an. And another: during

the horrific terrorist attacks in Mumbai just last week,"dozens of eyewitness accounts bylocal Indians said the gunmen shouted 'Allah Akbar' from the Jewish center." )

If McVeigh killed 168 innocents "pursuant to the dictates" of his Christian beliefs, surelythere must exist such evidence in his words or writings.

Thus:

3. When and where did Timothy McVeigh explain or suggest that "Christian

fundamentalist beliefs" motivated the Oklahoma bombing?

The Number of American Muslims

Ali-Karamali writes, without citation, that

American Muslims constitute "only 3 percent of the

American population." (p. 32)

Only?

The US populationsurpassed 300 millionin 2006.Three percent would mean 9 million American

Muslims.

In 2007, the Pew Research Center, a "non-partisan

'fact tank'" that "does not take positions on policy

issues," completed a vast study of MuslimAmericans. According totheir report:

The methodological approach employed was the most

comprehensive ever used to study Muslim Americans. Nearly

60,000 respondents were interviewed to find a representative

sample of Muslims. Interviews were conducted in Arabic,Urdu, and Farsi, as well as English.

Their findings? "The Pew Muslim American studyestimates that Muslims constitute 0.6% of the US

adult population." By estimating the under-18

population at 850,000, they estimate a "total of 2.35million Muslims nationwide." That's less than 1% of
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.htmlhttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.htmlhttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/17/300.million.over/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/17/300.million.over/index.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/17/300.million.over/index.htmlhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/17/300.million.over/index.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB122816892289570229.htmlhttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html


7/20

the US population.

There are other documented estimates.

A 2004PBS reportcited demographer David B. Barrett's estimate of 4.1 million American

Muslims, or 1.4% of the population. Barrett's estimate "is the source for several referencetexts, including the Encyclopedia Britannica."

In 2001, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) sponsored and published a

report called"The Mosque in America"that "estimates a total Muslim population of 6-7

million in America." They interviewed by telephone representatives from 416 of America's1209 mosques, asking each to report "the number of people associated in any way" with

the mosque. The average response was 1629, including two mosques that "report 50,000

Muslims associated with them." (For some perspective on the likely accuracy of this figure,

the Islamic Center of America,the largest mosque in North America, had3,000 membersas of 2004.) By multiplying this average of 1629 by the number of mosques, they arrive at a

figure of about 2 million American Muslims associated with a mosque. And how does thereport arrive at the total? Estimates of "6-7 million in America seem reasonable in light ofthe figure of 2 million who associate with a mosque."

Professor Ishan Bagby, currently Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of

Kentucky, wrote the CAIR report. In a 2001AP article, Bagby called his estimate a"guestimation." "I'm not going to hang my hat on 6 million, but I think it's reasonable in

terms of guesses," Bagby said. "We need more thorough and accurate studies and more

comprehensive studies. I think this is the best that we have now." (Interestingly, ProfessorBagby islistedas a member of the outside advisory board for the 2007 Pew study that

estimated 2.35 million.)

To provide some insight into why some Muslims might have an incentive to inflate suchpopulation figures, consider the words of CAIR's Executive Director Nihad Awad (from a

Washington Post article): when "asked why his group settled on an estimate of 7 million in

its press statements rather than Bagby's range of 6 million to 7 million," he "said theorganization had used 6 million for six years. 'If we still used the number six,' he said,

'people would say, "Haven't we grown?"'"

And yet, even 7 million is still 20% smaller than the 9 million estimate given by Ali-

Karamali, which leads to the question:

4. What is the source for your book's estimate that Muslims make up 3% of the USpopulation? Why did you decide to use this estimate instead of those from other recent

studies?

Suicide Bombing

Ali-Karamali takes a strong stand against the legitimacy of suicide bombing: "suicide
http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/young-muslim-and-french/info-graphic-muslim-populations/info-graphic-muslim-populations-in-western-countries/2525/http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/young-muslim-and-french/info-graphic-muslim-populations/info-graphic-muslim-populations-in-western-countries/2525/http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/young-muslim-and-french/info-graphic-muslim-populations/info-graphic-muslim-populations-in-western-countries/2525/http://www.allied-media.com/AM/mosque_study.htmhttp://www.allied-media.com/AM/mosque_study.htmhttp://www.allied-media.com/AM/mosque_study.htmhttp://www.icofa.com/http://www.icofa.com/http://www.icofa.com/http://www.pluralism.org/news/article.php?id=7169http://www.pluralism.org/news/article.php?id=7169http://www.pluralism.org/news/article.php?id=7169http://www.cjonline.com/stories/102701/rel_muslimpop.shtmlhttp://www.cjonline.com/stories/102701/rel_muslimpop.shtmlhttp://www.cjonline.com/stories/102701/rel_muslimpop.shtmlhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam_usa.htmlhttp://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam_usa.htmlhttp://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam_usa.htmlhttp://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdfhttp://www.cjonline.com/stories/102701/rel_muslimpop.shtmlhttp://www.pluralism.org/news/article.php?id=7169http://www.icofa.com/http://www.allied-media.com/AM/mosque_study.htmhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/young-muslim-and-french/info-graphic-muslim-populations/info-graphic-muslim-populations-in-western-countries/2525/


8/20

bombers are terrorists ..., and they arenot acting within the rules of warfare in Islam." (p.170) She continues:

Suicide isforbidden in Islam. The use of force against noncombatants is also forbidden in Islam. Moreover,

terrorism, defined as the secret and clandestine use of force against civilians, is forbidden.

She explains that "some groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad themselves characterizetheir activities as jihad." (p. 187), and then appears to take a strong stand against their

tactics: "Under Islamic law, however, even groups who have legitimate grievances may not

use terrorism to achieve their ends." (emphasis added)

Yet the "leading Islamic scholar" Yusuf al-

Qaradawi (p. 220) has repeatedly justified

suicidal Palestinian attacks against Israeli

citizens. And impressively, he somehowmanages to express this justification without

contradicting Ali-Karamali at all!

Such an attack is not "suicide" but"martyrdom"because"Allah ... has

given the weak a weapon the strong donot have and that is their ability to

turn their bodies into bombs as

Palestinians do."Indeed:

a clear distinction has to be made here between

martyrdom and suicide. Suicide is an act or instance of

killing oneself intentionally out of despair, and finding

no outlet except putting an end to ones life. On the

other hand, martyrdom is a heroic act of choosing tosuffer death in the Cause of Allah, and thats why its

considered by most Muslim scholars as one of the

greatest forms of Jihad.

Similarly, in apostingon Qaradawi'sIslamOnline web site, we learn thatthe Islamic Fiqh Council of the international Organization of the Islamic

Conference "stresses that martyr operations are a form of jihad, and carrying out

those operations is a legitimate right that has nothing to do with suicide or

terrorism." (emphasis added)

Qaradawi has said that Israeli victims are neither noncombatants nor civilians. Hetold the BBC: "An Israeli woman is not like women in our societies, because she is a

soldier." He hasalso said, "Israeli society was completely military in its make-up

and did not include any civilians." (emphasis added)

Do others share Qaradawi's views? He believes so.According to the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://www.palestinecenter.org/cpap/documents/charter.htmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503545134http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503545134http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503545134http://www.palestinecenter.org/cpap/documents/charter.htmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503546498http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503546498http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503546498http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2001-12/05/article6.shtmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2001-12/05/article6.shtmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2001-12/05/article6.shtmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://www.palestinecenter.org/cpap/documents/charter.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2001-12/05/article6.shtmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stmhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503546498http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503545134http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3874893.stm


9/20

He said hundreds of other Islamic scholars are of the same opinion. In this respect, he is very much in tune

with what the vast majority of people in the Arab world believe.

Given that the man Ali-Karamali calls a "leading Muslim scholar" uses an alternative

dictionarywhere suicide is "martyrdom," where terrorism is "jihad," and where

innocent civilians are "military," forgive me for seeking clarification from her:

5. Do you condemn Hamas as a terrorist organization? How do you propose convincing

Sheikh al-Qaradawi, the "hundreds of scholars" that agree with him, and all of hisfollowers that the tactics of Hamas violate Islamic law?

Bin Laden: Muslim?

Ali-Karamali writes:

A leading Muslim scholar, Yusef al-

Qaradawi, issued afatwa immediatelyafter the attacks, declaring that Osama

bin Laden could not call himself a

Muslim. (p. 220)

This would in fact be a big deal.

In 2005, Judea Pearl, the widowof Wall Street Journal reporter

Daniel Pearl (executed by al-

Qaeda),criticized an American

"fatwa"against terrorism fornot being strong enough:

A fatwa that specifically condemned

Bin Laden, that invoked the strongest

punishments available under Muslim

law, that clarified the meaning of terrorism, and that singled out for condemnation religious figures who

support violencethose would be the words the entire world needs to hear.

Unfortunately, on Qaradawi's IslamOnline web site, the fatwa makes no mention of binLaden. AnEnglish press releasefrom September 14 reads: "Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, a

world renowned Muslim scholar, was among the first to issue a fatwa (religious degree)

denouncing the actions of terrorists, regardless of their faith and nationalities." But

nothing about bin Laden.

Even in theautomatically-translated version of the longer Arabic article, there is no

mention of Osama bin Laden.

Further, just a few days later, on September 16, Qaradawi appeared on his weekly Al-

Jazeera television program, Shari'a and Lifeand said, "I ... think that Osama bin Laden no

longer has the means to carry out something like this."
http://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2001-09/16/article2.shtmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2001-09/16/article2.shtmlhttp://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2001-09/16/article2.shtmlhttp://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.qaradawi.net%2Fsite%2Ftopics%2Farticle.asp%3Fcu_no%3D2%26item_no%3D1665%26version%3D1%26template_id%3D130%26parent_id%3D17http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.qaradawi.net%2Fsite%2Ftopics%2Farticle.asp%3Fcu_no%3D2%26item_no%3D1665%26version%3D1%26template_id%3D130%26parent_id%3D17http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.qaradawi.net%2Fsite%2Ftopics%2Farticle.asp%3Fcu_no%3D2%26item_no%3D1665%26version%3D1%26template_id%3D130%26parent_id%3D17http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP27701#_edn1http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP27701#_edn1http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP27701#_edn1http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP27701http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP27701#_edn1http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.qaradawi.net%2Fsite%2Ftopics%2Farticle.asp%3Fcu_no%3D2%26item_no%3D1665%26version%3D1%26template_id%3D130%26parent_id%3D17http://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2001-09/16/article2.shtmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.html


10/20

In October 2001, aquestion in the "Ask the Scholar"section of Qaradawi's web site askedif bin Laden is a terrorist.Dr. Ali Jum ah Muhammad, Mufti of Egypt and holder of a PhD

in Islamic Jurisprudence from Al-Azhar, responded:

To say that Ibn Laden and his group are terrorists is something related to personal judgment rather than a

fatwa. It is better that such matter be left for an impartial judiciary to decide, by probing into evidence and

addressing related issues that will help it reach final decisions, instead of playing tricks with peoples mindsand avoid dealing with the issue extensively.

This past March, almost seven years later, Qaradawiechoedthe same sentimentsdespite the fact that bin Laden claimed

responsibility for the 9/11 attacksin 2004:

"I ask Osama bin Laden to surrender and to hand himself over to an

international tribunal in order to respond to the charge that he ordered

the attacks of September 11," said al-Qaradawi in an interview with the

Arab newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat.

According to the well-known Muslim scholar, it is still not established "ina definitive way by the American secret services in their reports," of bin Laden's responsibility in the attacks

that occurred in New York and Washington in 2001.

So apparently Qaradawi issued a ruling that Osama bin Laden could not call himself a

Muslim just two days after the 9/11 attacks; he removed any bin Laden references from thecondemnations on his web site; and he then proceeded to spend six and a half years

questioning whether bin Laden is behind 9/11, even after bin Laden himself claimed

responsibility.

Perhaps the Muslim next door can help with this mystery:

6. Could you provide the text of Qaradawi'sfatwa that declared "Osama bin Laden couldnot call himself a Muslim"? Why do you think Qaradawi has since refused to acknowledge

bin Laden's responsibility for 9/11?

Female Circumcision/Clitoridectomy

Consider the

following two

statements:

1. "Clitoridectomy is aloathsome

procedure

unequivocally

antithetical
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544508&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholarhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544508&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholarhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544508&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholarhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503614781&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorEhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503614781&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorEhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503614781&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorEhttp://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1969289415http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1969289415http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1969289415http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5SpYbW1NaEhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5SpYbW1NaEhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.htmlhttp://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1969289415http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1969289415http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503614781&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaCounselorE%2FFatwaCounselorEhttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544508&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholar


11/20

to the principles of Islam."

2. "Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) by cutting off the piece of

skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is bycutting out the clitoris (this is called khufaad)."

One of these is the opinion of Ali-Karamali.

The other is fromReliance of the Traveller,a manual of Islamic law certified in 1991 by Al-Azhar University as a reliable guide to the "practice and faith of orthodox Sunni Islam."

(Ali-Karamali calls Al-Azhar "one of the great centers for Islamic studies." (p. 115)).

As inconvenient as it may be, #1 is from theMuslim Next Door.

The other one, fromReliance of the Traveller, is referencedhereandhere.

As Ali-Karamali points out, Egyptian Islamic clerics banned female circumcision in 2007.This is of course good news, but one can't help but ask: if it's "unequivocally antithetical to

the principles of Islam," what took them so long?

In fact, the ban in Egypt is a product of years of debate and international pressure, and

was only (finally) instituted after a 12-year-old girldied undergoing the procedurea little

tidbit Ms. Ali-Karamali doesn't mention.

TheReliance of the Traveller isn't the only Islamic source to

decree female circumcision as part of Islam. Here area few

more:

In 2003, Dr. Munir Muhammad Fawzy, a specialist ingynecology and obstetrics at 'Ein Shams UniversityMedical School in Egypt, was quoted in the weekly Al-

Haqiqa: "The Prophet [Muhammad] commanded women

to perform circumcision using the expression, 'Performcircumcision for girls.'"

Dr. Abu Leila, a lecturer at Al-Azhar (that "great centerfor Islamic studies") said in 2003: "The Prophet

[Muhammad] reaffirmed this custom, and we inherited it

as Muslims..."

In 2000, the ever-present and "leading Islamic scholar" Sheikh al-Qaradawi ruledin afatwa on the issue, "Anyone who thinks that circumcision is the best way toprotect his daughters should do it ... I support this, particularly in the period in

which we live."

And on the subject of Muslims "next door," the"frequently asked questions" (FAQ)

section of a Toronto Mosque's web site, with answers from "prominent muslim scholars
http://www.albalagh.net/bookstore/?action=view&item=0423http://www.albalagh.net/bookstore/?action=view&item=0423http://www.albalagh.net/bookstore/?action=view&item=0423http://www.answering-islam.org/Sharia/fem_circumcision.htmlhttp://www.answering-islam.org/Sharia/fem_circumcision.htmlhttp://www.answering-islam.org/Sharia/fem_circumcision.htmlhttp://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/22/clarification-of-islamic-law-support-for-female-genital-mutilation-by-dr-mark-durie/http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/22/clarification-of-islamic-law-support-for-female-genital-mutilation-by-dr-mark-durie/http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/22/clarification-of-islamic-law-support-for-female-genital-mutilation-by-dr-mark-durie/http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/297262/egypt_bans_female_circumcision_after.htmlhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/297262/egypt_bans_female_circumcision_after.htmlhttp://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.albalagh.net/bookstore/?action=view&item=0423http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA15203http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/297262/egypt_bans_female_circumcision_after.htmlhttp://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/01/22/clarification-of-islamic-law-support-for-female-genital-mutilation-by-dr-mark-durie/http://www.answering-islam.org/Sharia/fem_circumcision.htmlhttp://www.albalagh.net/bookstore/?action=view&item=0423


12/20

around the world," includes a response to the question, "What is Islam's position on femalecircumcision?" (#19). The answer begins by citing Ibn Qudamah, an Islamic scholar

known for his"vast knowledge, wisdom and wit":

Circumcision is obligatory for men, and it is an honour for women, but it is not obligatory for them. This is

the opinion of many scholars. (Imam) Ahmad said: For men it is more strictly required, but for women it is

less strictly required.

The response goes on to quote Muhammad as having said, "Circumcision is a Sunnah for

men, and an honour for women," though "there is some debate" as to this statement's

authenticity.

Thepage showing this question and answeris actually an image of the Mosque's FAQ page

as it existed on October 1, 2008.

It hassince been removed.

Why?

Because the Mosque leaders finally realized that female circumcision is indeed

"unequivocally antithetical to the principles of Islam"?

Or perhaps because the Toronto Starexposed this teaching (and many others) in

November 2008?

Ali-Karamali laments, "the popular media in the West still often portrays this practice asIslamic."

One wonders why.

Here's one more question for Ms. Ali-Karamali:

7. In light of (a) Yusuf al-Qaradawi's personal support of female circumcision, (b) thestatement from an Al-Azhar lecturer that Muhammad "reaffirmed this custom," and (c)

Ibn Qudamah's judgment that female circumcision is an "honour for women," do you still

claim female circumcision is "unequivocally antithetical to the principles of Islam"?

Honor Killings

As the United Nations Population Fundexplains,

Throughout the world, perhaps as many as 5,000 women and girls a year are murdered by members of their

own families, many of them for the "dishonour" of having been raped, often as not by a member of their own

extended family.

Honor killings are "associated with the community's or thefamily's demand for sexual chastity and virginity."
http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0038.htmhttp://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0038.htmhttp://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0038.htmhttp://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.khalidmosque.com/en/modules.php?op=modload&name=FAQ&file=index&myfaq=yes&id_cat=94&categories=General+Questions+%28Sisters%29&parent_id=0#tophttp://www.khalidmosque.com/en/modules.php?op=modload&name=FAQ&file=index&myfaq=yes&id_cat=94&categories=General+Questions+%28Sisters%29&parent_id=0#tophttp://www.khalidmosque.com/en/modules.php?op=modload&name=FAQ&file=index&myfaq=yes&id_cat=94&categories=General+Questions+%28Sisters%29&parent_id=0#tophttp://www.thestar.com/article/535278http://www.thestar.com/article/535278http://www.thestar.com/article/535278http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2000/english/ch03.htmlhttp://www.unfpa.org/swp/2000/english/ch03.htmlhttp://www.unfpa.org/swp/2000/english/ch03.htmlhttp://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24329http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2000/english/ch03.htmlhttp://www.thestar.com/article/535278http://www.thestar.com/article/535278http://www.khalidmosque.com/en/modules.php?op=modload&name=FAQ&file=index&myfaq=yes&id_cat=94&categories=General+Questions+%28Sisters%29&parent_id=0#tophttp://www.imagebam.com/image/6e890919919970http://www.sunnahonline.com/ilm/seerah/0038.htm


13/20

Ali-Karamali tackles the subject head-on: "Honor killings are not Islamic... Islam does not

require, sanction, or encourage honor killings." (p. 160)

But if this is the case, why doesReliance of the Traveller, certified in 1991 by Al-Azhar as a

guide that "conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community," state"retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and

without right,"but "not subject to retaliation" is"a father or mother (or their fathers ormothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring"?

In line with this, considerArticle 340 of the Jordanian penal code as of 1999:

(a) He who discovers his wife, or one of his maharim [female relatives of such a degree of consanguinity as

precludes marriage], while committing adultery with another man and kills, wounds, or injures one or both

of them, is exempt from any penalty; (b) He who discovers his wife, or one of his sisters or female relatives,

with another in an illegitimate bed, and kills, wounds, or injures [one or both of them] benefits from a

reduction of penalty. (emphasis added)

Commendably,according to MEMRI, "in mid-1999, Jordanian human-rights activists

managed to enlist the Jordanian crown and government to assist its campaign to win

tougher penalties for honor-murderers." But attempts to abolish or amend Article 340"met with fierce resistance from the public and its leaders alike":

In the heat of the Jordanian debate, this parliamentary coalition of several Islamist groups, most of whom

affiliate with the Muslim Brethren, issued afatwa that declared honor-killings are seen as favorable by Islam;

male relatives should punish their female relatives and not leave this duty to the state. Ibrahim Zayd al-

Kaylani, head of the Jordanian Islamic Action Front (IAF)'sIfta ' committee, said that a man who restrains

himself from committing an honor killing, leaving this unpleasant burden to the government, "negates the

values of virility advocated by Islam." Article 340, Kaylani added, is based on "the Islamic principle that

allows a Muslim to defend his honor, property, and blood." Muhammad Uwayda, dean of Zarqa

University's Sharia College and a member of the lower house, stated that while the Sharia does prohibitindividuals from taking the law into their own hands, "cases where a man catches his wife committing

adultery are the exception." The IAF issued afatwa to the effect that "canceling Article 340 would contradict

the Sharia." (emphasis added)

The Women's International Networkreported on the samefatwa(religious ruling); on the

same day that thousands of protesters denounced Article 340 outside the Jordanian

Parliament,

The Islamic Action Front (IAF), the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, issued a fatwa ... stating that

'cancelling Article 340 contradicts Islamic Sharia.'

The Muslim Brotherhood, of course, is no fringe group. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, whomAli-Karamali calls a "leading Muslim scholar," is"one of the Muslim Brotherhood's

spiritual leaders in the world."The Muslim American Society, which claims to be"America's Largest Muslim Grassroots Organization,"wasfounded by Muslim

Brotherhood leadersin America and accordingto the Chicago Tribuneis simply the

operating name for the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA.

Nonetheless, in December, 2001, minor amendments were made to Article 340. A guilty
http://upload.mn/files/5llfgida2pv9w2yyk723.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/5llfgida2pv9w2yyk723.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/5llfgida2pv9w2yyk723.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/3npls6bbu0ozncy64uue.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/3npls6bbu0ozncy64uue.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/3npls6bbu0ozncy64uue.jpghttp://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_2_26/ai_62140817/pg_1http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_2_26/ai_62140817/pg_1http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_2_26/ai_62140817/pg_1http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_2_26/ai_62140817/pg_1http://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=3896http://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=3896http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0409190261sep19,0,3204424,print.storyhttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0409190261sep19,0,3204424,print.storyhttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0409190261sep19,0,3204424,print.storyhttp://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-0409190261sep19,0,3204424,print.storyhttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/08/muslim_brotherhood_phonebook_c.phphttp://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=3896http://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://www.cesnur.org/2004/qaradawi.htmhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_2_26/ai_62140817/pg_1http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sr&ID=SR4107http://upload.mn/files/3npls6bbu0ozncy64uue.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/3npls6bbu0ozncy64uue.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/5llfgida2pv9w2yyk723.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/5llfgida2pv9w2yyk723.jpg


14/20

man would receive only a "reduction of penalty" instead of full exemption from penalty,and women who find and kill their husbands for committing adultery would receive the

same "benefit." Unfortunately, over the next year, the amendments appeared"to have

made little difference": there were more than 20 honor killings and killers received"lenient sentencesnot exceeding one year." In 2006, 15 - 20 Jordanian women werekilled

by relatives.

Islam's influence on honor killings extends beyondJordan. Just this year in Iraq,17-year-old Rand Abel-

Qader was murdered by her father. He did it, he

proclaimed to his neighbors, to "cleanse his honour"because she worked alongside (and had been seen

"conversing intimately") with a British soldier.

According to Rand's mother, he used his feet to pressdown on her throat until she suffocated, at which point

he called for a knife and began to stab her.

Rand's mother said, "I screamed and called out for her

two brothers so they could get their father away from

her. But when he told them the reason, instead of saving

her they helped him end her life."

The father was arrested, but, according to Rand's mother, "he was released two hours later

because it was an 'honour killing'. And, unfortunately, that is something to be proud of forany Iraqi man."

Why exactly was he released?

At the police station where the father was held Sergeant Ali Jabbar told The Observer last week: "Not much

can be done when we have an 'honour killing' case. You are in a Muslim society and women should live under

religious laws." (emphasis added)

Hence the eighth question for Ms. Ali-Karamali:

8. If Islam does not sanction honor killings, why would Al-Azhar (that "great center for

Islamic studies") certify a manual of Islamic law that rules killing one's offspring is notsubject to retaliationand why would any mainstream Islamic group issue a religious

ruling that harsher penalties for honor killings would

"contradict the Shari'a"?

Bin Laden's Motivations

Ali-Karamali writes:
http://tinyurl.com/6lof6fhttp://tinyurl.com/6lof6fhttp://tinyurl.com/6lof6fhttp://tinyurl.com/6lof6fhttp://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/27/iraq.military1http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=70634http://tinyurl.com/6lof6fhttp://tinyurl.com/6lof6f


15/20

... although people like Osama bin Laden use religious symbolism and terminology to legitimize their attacks,

their purpose is not to wage war against all non-Muslims. I hear frequently the view that bin Laden fights the

U.S. because we're a country of Jews and Christians. This is incorrect. Bin Laden does not oppose the U.S.

because it is a non-Muslim country ... but because he sees the U.S. as responsible for the turmoil in some of

the Islamic world today.(p.192, emphasis added)

Yet an essay authorized (or perhaps even written) by Osama bin Laden himself saysotherwise:

... what the debate truly revolves around ... is the word of the Messenger [Muhammad] as has been relayed by

Ahmad and others from Ibn Omar: "I have been sent in the final hours with the sword, so that none is

worshipped but Allah alone, partnerless. My provision has been provided under the shadow of my spear, and

humiliation and contempt is upon whoever opposes my command. Whoever imitates a people is of them."

And his saying in the two authentic [accounts of Bukhari and Muslim] as relayed by Ibn Omar: "I have been

commanded to battle mankind until they declare that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the

Messenger of Allah. [Let them] uphold prayer and render alms; if they do so, they safeguard their blood and

possessions from me, except for Islam's due, and their fate is with Allah."

He also said, per Berida as found in Muslim and Ahmad: "Whenever the Messenger of Allah appointed

someone as leader of an army or detachment, he would especially exhort him to fear Allah and be good to theMuslims with him. Then he would say: 'Attack in the name of Allah and in the path of Allah do battle with

whoever rejects Allah. Attack!but do not embezzle [the spoils], nor behave treacherously, nor mutilate [the

dead], nor kill the children. If you happen upon your idolatrous enemies, call them to three courses of action.

If they respond to any one of these, accept it and stay yourself from them. [1] Call them to Islam: If they

respond [i.e., convert], accept this and cease fighting them... [2] If they refuse to accept Islam, demand of

them thejizya [poll tax]: If they respond, accept it and cease fighting them. [3] But if they refuse, seek the aid

of Allah and fight them."

Thus our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issueone that

demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voiceand it is: Does Islam, or does it

not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes.

There are only three choices in Islam: either willing submission; or payment of the jizya, through physical

though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or the swordfor it is not right to let him [an

infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of

Islam, or die... Are these options a part of the faith or not?(emphasis added)

The essay was originally published in Arabic for a Saudi audience,

and henceunlike most of the propaganda al-Qaeda has producedover the yearswas not intended for American non-Muslim eyes.

It was translated for the first time by Raymond Ibrahim and

published in his book,The Al-Qaeda Reader. A scanned version of

the excerpt beginshereand endshere.

Beyond serving as a complete contradiction to Ali-Karamali's claim

regarding bin Laden's motivations, this excerpt sheds light onseveral additional arguments that Ali-Karamali makes:

Firstly, Osama bin Laden goes well beyond "religious symbolism

and terminology." In fact, his entire argument here is based onthreehadith [sayings of Muhammad] from authentic Islamic

sources. These three hadith are easily verifiable:Ahmad 2.50/Abu Dawud 4.314,Sahih

Muslim 1.33, andSahih Muslim 19.4294.
http://www.amazon.com/Al-Qaeda-Reader-Raymond-Ibrahim/dp/038551655Xhttp://www.amazon.com/Al-Qaeda-Reader-Raymond-Ibrahim/dp/038551655Xhttp://www.amazon.com/Al-Qaeda-Reader-Raymond-Ibrahim/dp/038551655Xhttp://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/1t8grvvstt8jo7vn9xbm.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/1t8grvvstt8jo7vn9xbm.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/1t8grvvstt8jo7vn9xbm.jpghttp://books.google.com/books?id=kN3V_Cs6gswC&pg=PA500http://books.google.com/books?id=kN3V_Cs6gswC&pg=PA500http://books.google.com/books?id=kN3V_Cs6gswC&pg=PA500http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/019.smt.html#019.4294http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/019.smt.html#019.4294http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/019.smt.html#019.4294http://www.amazon.com/Al-Qaeda-Reader-Raymond-Ibrahim/dp/038551655Xhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/019.smt.html#019.4294http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/001.smt.html#001.0033http://books.google.com/books?id=kN3V_Cs6gswC&pg=PA500http://upload.mn/files/1t8grvvstt8jo7vn9xbm.jpghttp://upload.mn/files/kwb7cu09o6thcb3wv5h9.jpghttp://www.amazon.com/Al-Qaeda-Reader-Raymond-Ibrahim/dp/038551655X


16/20

Secondly, despite Ali-Karamali's repeated assurances that Muhammad "never entered into

a war that was not defensive" (p. 55), these hadith demonstrate Muhammad's offensive

intentions toward fighting all of mankindand certainly are used by al-Qaeda and binLaden to argue to their audience that they are simply living up to the authentic

requirements of their Islamic faith. (Could this be the reason scholars like Yusuf al-Qaradawi are so reluctant to explicitlycondemnor"excommunicate"Osama bin Laden?)

Finally, Ali-Karamali writes that the purpose of the Qur'an's fighting verses,

contrary to media impressions, was not to command Muslims to unconditionally go find themselves some

unbelievers and kill them if they did not immediately convert at sword-point. If it had been ... Muhammad

would have attacked the various non-Muslim peoples living around him and killed them for the sole reason

that they were unbelievers. That is something he never did. (p.174)

This is a very interesting statement. Twice, in just two sentences, Ali-Karamali refutes the

claim that Islam calls for unbelievers to convert or be killed.

But as the hadith (and bin Laden) explicitly call out above, Muhammad did not call

Muslims to kill unbelievers "if they did not immediately convert." He didnot kill non-Muslims "for the sole reason that they were unbelievers." There wasand always has been

in Islamthe critical third option for unbelievers to submit to Islam's authority in body if

not in spirit.

Straw man, Ms. Ali-Karamali?

Indeed, the third choice for non-Muslims under Islamic rule (other than conversion or

death) was to becomedhimmis. Dhimmis are second-class citizens in Islamic society, forced

to pay an additional tax known as thejizya to their Muslim rulers and forced to obey awide range of humiliating rules to feel "subdued." All of this is encapsulated in a single

Qur'anic verse, 9.29for Muslims, the literal word of God:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by

Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book

[Jews and Christians], until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Ali-Karamali writes later that non-Muslims "paid thejizya in return for retention of their

religion and culture, exemption from military duty, and protection from the state againstaggressors." (p. 179) No mention of the humiliating and oppressive rules that went along

with the tax to make them feel "subdued"; I'll save that topic for my final question.

But first, let's ask Ms. Ali-Karamali about bin Laden and his objectives:

9. Given al-Qaeda's statement that their conflict with the West "ultimately revolve[s]

around one issue"that Islam forces people "by the power of the sword to submit to its

authority corporeally if not spiritually," do you still believe that bin Laden opposes the USonly because it's "responsible for the turmoil in some of the Islamic world today"?
http://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.htmlhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-11-muslims_x.htmhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-11-muslims_x.htmhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-11-muslims_x.htmhttp://www.drury.edu/ess/Logic/Informal/Strawman.htmlhttp://www.drury.edu/ess/Logic/Informal/Strawman.htmlhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.drury.edu/ess/Logic/Informal/Strawman.htmlhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-11-muslims_x.htmhttp://www.danielpearl.org/news_and_press/articles/word_choice.html


17/20

Christians and Jews Under Islam

As mentioned above, Islam allowed non-Muslims to keep their religion while submitting to

Islamic rule.

An often-quoted Qur'anic versestates"there should be no compulsion in religion"; Ali-Karamali cites it as well. (p. 193)

While there are many disagreements about the context of this verse, the Islamic scholarTabari (a "highly respected luminary" according to Ali-Karamali)explainedthat Jews and

Christians "are not to be compelled to enter Islam if they submit to paying the jizyah."

Ali-Karamali writes that "the Qur'an did not mandate" thejizya "as a necessarilytheological practice." (p. 194) And yet,verse 9.29 of the Qur'anseems to suggest otherwise:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden byAllah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book

[Jews and Christians], until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

(emphasis added)

(Curiously, Ali-Karamali does not mention this verse in her discussion of the Qur'an's"fighting verses.")

Regardless, while Ali-Karamali concedes thejizya as a price for tolerance of non-Muslimsunder Islamic rule, she ignores the final element of verse 9.29: "and feel themselves

subdued."

Ibn Kathir, described on Qaradawi's website as a"great scholar,"offers his

perspective on this verse:

Paying thejizya is a sign of"disgrace," paid "in defeat and

subservience." Thedhimmis (Jews and Christians

under Islamic rule) should feel

"disgraced, humiliated, and

belittled;" Muslims "are not

allowed to honor" them. They are"miserable, disgraced, and

humiliated."

And yet, Ali-Karamali writes that the Qur'an "specifically enjoins respect of unbelievers"

and "forbids discourtesy to Jews and Christians." (p. 82)
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/002.qmt.html#002.256http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/002.qmt.html#002.256http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/002.qmt.html#002.256http://books.google.com/books?id=sIXpFtvp2JYC&pg=PA253http://books.google.com/books?id=sIXpFtvp2JYC&pg=PA253http://books.google.com/books?id=sIXpFtvp2JYC&pg=PA253http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1159951477045&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1159951477045&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1159951477045&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1159951477045&pagename=Zone-English-Living_Shariah%2FLSELayouthttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029http://books.google.com/books?id=sIXpFtvp2JYC&pg=PA253http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/002.qmt.html#002.256


18/20

For Ali-Karamali, the second caliph Umar's treatment of Christians provides evidence ofIslamic tolerance:

...when the second caliph of Islam, Umar, conquered Jerusalem in 638, the Muslims left Christians free to

practice Christianity and visit the holy places. (p. 195, emphasis added)

The"famous exegete"Ibn Kathir, again in his commentary ofverse 9.29, gives a bit moredetail surrounding the second caliph's treatment of Christians:

'Umar bin Al-Khattab ... demanded his well-known conditions be met by the Christians, these conditions that

ensured their continued humiliation, degradation, and disgrace. (emphasis added)

According to Ibn Kathir, the Christiansagreed to many of Umar's conditions, including:

Not to build new churches Not to restore existing churches Not to publicly practice Christianity Not to invite anyone to Christianity Not to sound their church bells To "move from the places we sit" if Muslims "choose to sit in them"

Ibn Kathir adds that Umar required the Christians to agree to one more clause:

If we break any of these promises ... you are allowed to do with us what you are allowed of people of defiance

and rebellion.

As for the Jews, Ali-Karamali writes that a "big myth in the making is the idea that Jewsand Muslims have always been deep ... enemies." (p. 230) She continues, "It is a myth.

Muslim Spain is just one example of how Jews and Muslims (and Christians, as well) lived

in a multicultural, multireligious society..."

Unfortunately, Islamic oppression ofdhimmi Jews was still alive and well in Muslim Spain.

Maimonides, a Jewish rabbi, physician, and philosopher, wasborn in 1135 in Muslim Spain. Fouad Ajami, Professor of

Middle East Studies at the Johns Hopkins University,explained

that Maimonides fled Spain because the Muslim rulers "madethe life of Spain's Jews ... utter hell."

Maimonides himselfwrote:

... God has hurled us in the midst of this people, the Arabs, who have

persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory legislation

against us, as Scripture has forewarned us, 'Our enemies themselves shall

judge us' (Deuteronomy 32:31). Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase

and hate us as much as they. (emphasis added)

Ali-Karamali argues that thejizya tax "according to the modern

view, is not an Islamic requirement for today's world, where no differences at all should be
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544972&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaE%2FPrintFatwaE+http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544972&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaE%2FPrintFatwaE+http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544972&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaE%2FPrintFatwaE+http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.washingtonpost.com/WPC-edit-dyn/content/article/2006/03/30/AR2006033001553_pf.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/WPC-edit-dyn/content/article/2006/03/30/AR2006033001553_pf.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/WPC-edit-dyn/content/article/2006/03/30/AR2006033001553_pf.htmlhttp://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/25/41/http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/25/41/http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/25/41/http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/25/41/http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/25/41/http://www.washingtonpost.com/WPC-edit-dyn/content/article/2006/03/30/AR2006033001553_pf.htmlhttp://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503544972&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar%2FFatwaE%2FPrintFatwaE+


19/20

made on the basis of religion." (p. 194)

Unfortunately, not all Muslims agree.

As noted byAndrew Bostom, the December 23-26, 2005 edition of the Wall Street Journal

included an interview with Hassam El-Masalmeh, a Hamas leader from Bethlehem, whosaid this of thejizya for non-Muslims:

We in Hamas intend to implement this tax someday. We say it openlywe welcome everyone to Palestine but

only if they agree to live under our rules.

As Bostom writes, El-Masalmeh wasn't the first Palestinian leader to speak publicly about

bringing back thejizya. Sheik Muhammad Ibrahim Al-Madhi conveyed a similar message

during asermonbroadcast live on Palestinian Authority Television in 2001:

We welcome, as we did in the past, any Jew who wants to live in this land as a Dhimmi, just as the Jews have

lived in our countries, as Dhimmis, and have earned appreciation, and some of them have even reached the

positions of counselor or minister here and there. We welcome the Jews to live as Dhimmis, but the rule in

this land and in all the Muslim countries must be the rule of Allah.

With that, it's time for the last question for Ms. Ali-Karamali:

10. How do you reconcile the Qur'anic injunctions to make non-Muslims "feel subdued"

and, according to the Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir, "miserable," "disgraced," "humiliated,"

"degraded," and "belittled"with your book's point that the "Qur'an forbids discourtesy

to Jews and Christians"?

Conclusion

At the end of her book, Ali-Karamali writes that "it is time for genuine understanding anddialogue," with a wish that "we can separate the daily distortions from the reality."

Hopefully, in that spirit, she will be willing to answer the ten questions presented here.

But the questions aren't just for her.

Eight world-renowned experts on Islamhave praised The Muslim Next Doorfor its

"honesty" and for being "refreshingly frank," "consistently reliable," "comprehensive,"

and "intelligent."

I invite them to respond as well:

Dr. John Esposito Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl Dr. Eboo Patel Dr. Chibli Mallat Reza Aslan
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5116http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5116http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5116http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP24001http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP24001http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP24001http://muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/jle2/http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/jle2/http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=386http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=386http://ifyc.org/about_core/staff/executive_leadershiphttp://ifyc.org/about_core/staff/executive_leadershiphttp://www.mallat.com/http://www.mallat.com/http://www.rezaaslan.com/http://www.rezaaslan.com/http://www.rezaaslan.com/http://www.mallat.com/http://ifyc.org/about_core/staff/executive_leadershiphttp://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=386http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/jle2/http://muslimnextdoor.com/reviews.htmlhttp://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP24001http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5116


20/20

Dr. Ali Asani Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Dr. Carole Hillenbrand

Additional NotesDecember 9, 2008:

o Robert Spencer wrote about these questions atJihadWatch.o Ms. Ali-Karamali and seven of the eight experts mentioned above have now

been explicitly invited via email to address these questions; no one has

responded so far.o Ms. Ali-Karamali was invited to speak at a Palo Alto, CA public high school

this past Friday.

o Ms. Ali-Karamali is scheduled to speak at Kepler's Book Store in MenloPark, CA onTuesday, February 10. Perhaps she'll be taking questions?

oOne reader had this reaction to these questions: "To equate all expressions ofIslam with bin Laden, Hamas, and other terrorist arms of fundamentalism is

the same brand of blood libel that led to the slaughter of my own peopleunder another brand of fanatacism." Yet nowhere above do I write anything

even close to this. In fact, some courageous Muslim reformers have been

working very hard to advocate "expressions of Islam" that are truthful andcompletely peaceful:Tawfik Hamid,the late Tashbih Sayyed, andKhalim

Massoud, to name a few.
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/faculty/asani.htmhttp://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/faculty/asani.htmhttp://www.asmasociety.org/about/b_rauf.htmlhttp://www.asmasociety.org/about/b_rauf.htmlhttp://www.imes.ed.ac.uk/index_pages/staff_pages/prof_hillenbrand.htmlhttp://www.imes.ed.ac.uk/index_pages/staff_pages/prof_hillenbrand.htmlhttp://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023818.phphttp://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023818.phphttp://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023818.phphttp://voice.paly.net/view_story.php?id=7533http://voice.paly.net/view_story.php?id=7533http://www.keplers.com/?sec=programs-events&subsec=upcoming-eventshttp://www.keplers.com/?sec=programs-events&subsec=upcoming-eventshttp://www.keplers.com/?sec=programs-events&subsec=upcoming-eventshttp://www.tawfikhamid.com/http://www.tawfikhamid.com/http://www.tawfikhamid.com/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/28357http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/28357http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/28357http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.reformislam.org/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/28357http://www.tawfikhamid.com/http://www.keplers.com/?sec=programs-events&subsec=upcoming-eventshttp://voice.paly.net/view_story.php?id=7533http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023818.phphttp://www.imes.ed.ac.uk/index_pages/staff_pages/prof_hillenbrand.htmlhttp://www.asmasociety.org/about/b_rauf.htmlhttp://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/faculty/asani.htm

ten questions for the muslim next door

Documents