technical coordinating committee meeting agenda - … 101713.pdf · technical coordinating...
TRANSCRIPT
Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting AGENDA (Full packet with attachments available at www.ccta.net) This meeting is scheduled to be audiocast live on the CCTA website. Visit our Meetings & Agendas page to tune in.
DATE: Thursday, October 17, 2013
TIME: 2:30 p.m.
PLACE: Contra Costa Transportation Authority 2999 Oak Road, Suite 110 Walnut Creek, CA 94597
COMMISSIONERS Janet Abelson, Chair Kevin Romick, Vice Chair Newell Arnerich Tom Butt David Durant Federal Glover
Dave Hudson Mike Metcalf Karen Mitchoff Julie Pierce Robert Taylor
ALTERNATES Candace Andersen John Gioia Wade Harper Dave Hudson Ron Leone Sherry McCoy Mary Piepho Karen Stepper Don Tatzin
EX-OFFICIOS Amy Worth, MTC Joel Keller, BART Myrna de Vera, Public Transit Bus Operators
Executive Director Randell H. Iwasaki
A. CONVENE MEETING: Steve Kersevan, Chair
B. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to address the Committee regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please complete one of the speaker cards in advance of the meeting and hand it to a member of the staff.
C. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY OF ACTIONS: TCC Summary of Actions from August 15, 2013. (Attachment - Action)
CONSENT CALENDAR
1.0 Attendance Log from August 15, 2013.
2.0 Monthly Project Status Report. Staff Contact: Ross Chittenden (Attachment - Information)
3.0 Funding Summary. An update on the application deadlines for potential funding sources and on successful application results. Staff Contact: Amin AbuAmara (Attachment - Information)
End of Consent Calendar
Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting AGENDA October 17, 2013
Page 2 of 2
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\TCC Agenda 101713.docx
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
4.0 Project Monitoring: Upcoming Obligation Deadlines for Federal Aid Projects, and Status of Projects Placed on FHWA Quarterly Inactive Lists. Staff will provide an update on federal aid projects with upcoming obligation deadlines and projects at risk of losing funds. Staff Contact: Amin AbuAmara (Attachment - Information) CMA Function
5.0 Countywide Model Land Use Update to Projections 2013 (Plan Bay Area). ABAG will soon be releasing the official land use forecasts based on the recently adopted Regional Transportation Plan (“Plan Bay Area”), as Projections 2013. Staff proposes updating the Countywide Model with the latest projections series for use in the Countywide
Transportation Plan EIR and ongoing planning efforts. Staff Contact: Matt Kelly (Attachment - Information)
6.0 Review of the SR 239 Draft Feasibility Study. A draft Feasibility Study for the State Route (SR) 239 Corridor was issued in mid-September for review and comment by stakeholders and interested parties throughout the study area, which spans three counties – Contra Costa, San Joaquin, and Alameda. The study was prepared by the Parsons Transportation Group. Staff will provide an overview of the study. Staff Contact: Matt Kelly (Attachment - Information)
7.0 Adjournment to next regular meeting on November 21, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.
ANY WRITINGS OR DOCUMENTS pertaining to an open session item provided to a majority of the Committee less than 72 hours prior to the meeting shall be made available for public inspection at 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, California, during normal business hours. PUBLIC COMMENT: The public may comment on any matter on the agenda, or related matters not on the agenda, by completing a speaker card (available in meeting room), which should be provided to a CCTA staff member. Public comment may be limited to three minutes (or other such time period as determined by the Chair), in accordance with CCTA’s Administrative Code, Section 103.4(b). TRANSLATION SERVICES: If you require a translator to facilitate testimony to the Authority, please contact Danice Rosenbohm at (925) 256-4722 no later than 48 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting. Si usted requiere a un traductor para facilitar testimonio a la Authority, por favor llame Danice al (925) 256-4722, 48 horas antes de la asamblea. ADA COMPLIANCE: This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Govt. Code Sec. 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability-related modification or accommodation should contact Danice Rosenbohm (925-256-4722) during regular business hours, at least 24 hours prior to the time of the meeting.
Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
MEETING DATE:
August 15, 2013
MEMBERS PRESENT: Heather Ballenger, Laramie Bowron, Jerry Fahy, Tom Harais, Deidre Heitman, Steve Kersevan, Ray Kuzbari, Jeremy Lochirco, Yvetteh Ortiz, Paul Reinders, Tai Williams, Steven Tam
STAFF PRESENT: Matt Kelly, Hisham Noeimi, Michael Higgins (PTG)
ACTIONS LISTED BY: Mari Shine
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\Summary of Actions.docx
ITEM/DISCUSSION ACTION
C. Summary of Actions from June 20, 2013 Meeting
Accepted
1. Attendance Log from June 20, 2013 Accepted
2. Funding Summary Accepted
3. City of Pleasant Hill – Geary Road Widening – Phase 3 (Project 24007) – 95% Design Peer Review
Accepted
4. Project Monitoring: Upcoming Obligation Deadlines for Federal Aid Projects, and Status of Projects Placed on FHWA Quarterly Inactive Lists
Accepted
5. Draft Results of 2013 Congestion Management Program (CMP)Traffic Monitoring
Accepted
Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting SUMMARY OF ACTIONS August 15, 2013
Page 2 of 2
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\Summary of Actions.docx
6. 2014 State Transportation Improvement Programs (STIP) Candidate Projects
Approved staff recommendations.
7. Updated Policies and Procedures for Locally-Sponsored Measure J Projects – Guidelines for Local Agency Coordination
Approved staff recommendations and noted that Complete Streets Policy applies to transit projects as well.
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTMeeting Date: October 17, 2013
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\02 - Status Report STAFF REPORT.docx
Subject Monthly Project Status Report
Summary of Issues This report outlines the status of current Measure projects. It also lists
all completed projects.
Recommendations None – for information only.
Financial Implications None
Options
Attachments A. Monthly Project Status Report
Changes from
Committee
Background
The Project Managers for all Measure C and Measure J projects update the status of those
projects for the Board’s information on a monthly basis.
2 -1
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Active Projects ................................................................................................................. 5
SOUTHWEST COUNTY............................................................................................................. 5
a. Caldecott Fourth Bore Project (1001/1698) .................................................................... 5
b. I-680 Auxiliary Lanes, Segment 2 (1106S2) ...................................................................... 6
c. Santa Maria Intersection Improvements (1623/1623 W) – No changes from lastmonth............................................................................................................................... 7
d. I-680 HOV Direct Access Ramps Project (8003)- No changes from last month............... 7
CENTRAL COUNTY................................................................................................................... 8
e. Commerce Avenue Extension (1214)............................................................................... 8
f. Pacheco Boulevard Widening (1216/24003) – No changes from last month ............... 10
g. Martinez Intermodal Station – Phase 3 (4002/27001) .................................................. 10
h. Pacheco Transit Hub (2210) ........................................................................................... 11
i. Interstate 680 / State Route 4 Interchange Improvements – SR 4 Widening (Phase3) (6001)......................................................................................................................... 12
j. SR242/Clayton Road Ramps (6002/6004) – No changes from last month.................... 12
k. I-680 Southbound HOV Gap Closure (8001) .................................................................. 13
l. Comprehensive Wayfinding System – Central County BART Stations (10001-03) –No changes from last month ......................................................................................... 14
m. Electronic Bicycle Facility at Central County BART Stations (10001-04) – No changesfrom last month ............................................................................................................. 14
n. Marsh Creek Road Upgrade (24001) – No changes from last month............................ 15
o. Court Street Overcrossing – Phase 1 (24005) – No changes from last month .............. 16
p. Buskirk Avenue Widening – Phase 2 (24006)................................................................. 17
q. Contra Costa Blvd Improvements (24006)..................................................................... 17
r. Geary Road Improvements – Phase 3 (24007) - No changes from last month ............. 18
s. Clayton Road/Treat Blvd/Denkinger Road Intersection Capacity Improvements(24028) - No changes from last month.......................................................................... 19
WEST COUNTY ...................................................................................................................... 20
t. Atlas Road Bridge Project (3111) ................................................................................... 20
u. Hercules Rail Station (4001) ........................................................................................... 20
v. I-80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange (7002)............................................................... 22
2 -2
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 3
w. I-80/Central Avenue Interchange (7003) - No changes from last month ...................... 22
x. Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (7005)......................................................... 24
y. Marina Bay Parkway Grade Separation (9003).............................................................. 25
z. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and Access Improvements at El Cerrito Plazaand del Norte BART Stations (Project 10002-01) .......................................................... 26
aa. Electric Bicycle Facility at West County BART Stations (10002-03) - No Changes fromLast Month ..................................................................................................................... 26
bb. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and Access Improvements at El Cerrito Plazaand del Norte BART Stations (Project 10002-01) .......................................................... 27
cc. Comprehensive Wayfinding System for West Contra Costa BART Stations (10002-05) - No Changes from Last Month................................................................................ 27
EAST COUNTY........................................................................................................................ 28
dd. SR4 Widening Railroad Avenue to Loveridge Road (1405) ............................................ 28
ee. SR4 Widening: Loveridge Road to Somersville Road (1406/3003) ................................ 29
ff. SR4 Widening: Somersville Road to SR160 (1407/3001) ............................................... 30
gg. East County Rail Extension (eBART) (2104/2001) .......................................................... 34
hh. SR4/SR160 Connector Ramps (5001) ............................................................................. 35
ii. SR4 Mokelumne Trail Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing (portion of Project 5002) ........... 36
jj. SR4 Widen to 4 Lanes – Laurel Road to Sand Creek Road & Sand Creek RoadInterchange – Phase 1 (5002 & 5003)............................................................................ 37
kk. SR4 Balfour Road Interchange – Phase 1 (5005)............................................................ 38
2. Completed Projects........................................................................................................ 39
SOUTHWEST COUNTY........................................................................................................... 39
Measure C ............................................................................................................................. 39
CENTRAL COUNTY................................................................................................................. 40
Measure C ............................................................................................................................. 40
Measure J .............................................................................................................................. 41
WEST COUNTY ...................................................................................................................... 41
Measure C ............................................................................................................................. 41
Measure J .............................................................................................................................. 41
EAST COUNTY........................................................................................................................ 41
Measure C ............................................................................................................................. 41
2 -3
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 4
Measure J .............................................................................................................................. 41
2 -4
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 5
1. Active Projects
SOUTHWEST COUNTY
a. Caldecott Fourth Bore Project (1001/1698)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Construction of a fourth bore between Contra Costa andAlameda Counties.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
Work on the Operations and Maintenance Center (OMC) building continues. Mechanicalstartup and air balancing is ongoing. Pre-testing is ongoing at the two electrical substations.The installation of the metal panels on both sides of the tunnel has been completed. The JetFans testing and balancing have started. The fire control and monitor systems are beinginstalled at the Fire Annex building.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Several outstanding concerns could affect the completion date and final cost of the project.
Changes introduced by State Fire Marshal and other design changes have resulted inadditional costs. Caltrans and the contractor are making progress to finalize theadditional costs incurred during the mining operations. Staff is continuing to meetwith Caltrans Director, Malcolm Dougherty, to discuss additional state funding.
The construction contingency was replenished with $18.3 million in Measure J fundsfrom the project reserve in July 2013. The project reserve is nearly depleted.
2 -5
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 6
b. I-680 Auxiliary Lanes, Segment 2 (1106S2)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C, STIP
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Construction of northbound and southbound auxiliary lanes onI-680 between Crow Canyon Road in San Ramon and SycamoreValley Road in Danville.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
Construction of the auxiliary lanes began on March 21, 2013 and is anticipated to becomplete in spring 2014. Work is progressing along both sides of I-680 between Crow CanyonRoad and Sycamore Valley Road. Temporary restriping and temporary concrete barriers alongI-680 will be in place for the duration of the construction work. Current activities includeretaining wall construction and permanent sound wall construction. All sound wallconstruction along the east side of I-680 is complete. Preparation of the roadway structuralsection and drainage systems for the new auxiliary lanes is under way with concrete pavingoperations anticipated to begin in late fall.
Construction of the auxiliary lanes project is approximately 53% complete.
A public outreach effort is in effect to keep the public informed on project progress and torespond to inquiries. The project hotline number is 925-262-1158.
The project area will be landscaped after the construction of the auxiliary lanes is complete.
The landscape design is underway and is expected to be complete in 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
Note: The Town of Danville requested information regarding what would be involved inextending soundwall No. 3 northward to connect to the existing soundwall locatedapproximately 200 feet south of Jewel Terrace. Authority staff sent a letter in response onJune 11, 2013. Staff is working with Caltrans and the construction contractor to get a costproposal to extend the soundwall.
2 -6
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 7
c. Santa Maria Intersection Improvements (1623/1623 W) – No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure C
Lead Agency City of Orinda
Project Description Improvement of traffic lane signing and striping, traffic signalhardware and overhead signage.
Current Project Phase Design and Environmental Clearance.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $75,000 for design and environmental clearance inNovember 2010. The latest version of the signal, signage and striping plans was presented tothe Orinda City Council on August 21, 2012, with no significant changes. The City staff anddesign consultant, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., then attended a City/County EngineeringAdvisory Committee (CCEAC) Phase II peer review of the 90% design on September 5, 2012.The plans were recommended for approval with minor modifications. The City receivedcomments from Caltrans on the encroachment permit submittal and is currently reviewingthese comments. The City is working with Caltrans on review of the design of the revisedCamino Pablo striping. The City’s intent is to have the project ready to bid and construct inspring 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
d. I-680 HOV Direct Access Ramps Project (8003) - No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Provide direct HOV connector ramps from/to I-680 at or nearNorris Canyon Road.
Current Project Phase Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED).
Project Status
The project team has developed preliminary geometrics for an additional alternative to bestudied that would include a direct ramp access at Executive Parkway. Because of the
2 -7
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 8
addition of the new alternative and the time required to develop the appropriate studies forthe new alternative, the environmental clearance phase is expected to extend until late 2014.A public scoping meeting that included the new alternative was held on March 13, 2013, inSan Ramon at the San Ramon Community Center. One hundred thirty-six (136) members ofthe public attended and were able to comment for the first time on the Executive ParkwayAlternative. Comments were accepted through the close of the comment period on April 16,2013. Technical studies supporting the environmental document are underway. The draftenvironmental document is scheduled for release for public comment in spring 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern
The project has received a high level of community interest, with a number of local residentsvoicing strong concerns about the proposed direct HOV ramps at Norris Canyon. In responseto the community concerns, an additional alternative location for the direct ramps wasidentified at Executive Parkway and the public outreach efforts were increased to providemultiple opportunities for community involvement. The project scope will include addressinglocal traffic circulation concerns and community impacts and the environmental documentwill be an Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment (EIR/EA). Thedevelopment of the EIR/EA will be coordinated with the Metropolitan TransportationCommission (MTC) environmental document for Express Lanes.
CENTRAL COUNTY
e. Commerce Avenue Extension (1214)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C
Lead Agency City of Concord
Project Description Extend Commerce Avenue between Pine Creek and WaterworldParkway and rehabilitate the pavement section on CommerceAvenue between Concord Avenue and the end of CommerceAvenue near the cul-de-sac.
Current Project Phase Design & Right-of-Way (ROW).
Project Status
The project’s environmental clearance was obtained on November 10, 2009. The ROW phaseis well underway. The City’s ROW agent met with all property owners, completed appraisals
2 -8
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 9
and prepared offers. Acquisition contracts have recently been approved by the City’s legaldepartment and the City is having the contracts executed by property owners. The CityCouncil approved ROW contracts for three property owners in December 2011. An offer wasmade, accepted and signed by the fourth owner in December 2012. The City Councilapproved the right-of-way contract with the fourth property owner at their February 26, 2013meeting.
Payment was made to the fourth property owner for the right-of-way, as required. Responsesto the latest round of design and right-of-way comments have been sent back for review. TheCity met with Flood Control District staff in early July to discuss the remaining outstandingissues. Significant progress was made on resolving outstanding design issues. The FloodControl District is reviewing responses to comments made as a result of this meeting.
The City is planning to request an additional appropriation for ROW funds. Although the plansare 95% complete, construction is rescheduled to summer 2014 and may be delayed again,depending on the length of the ROW process with the last property owner.
Measure J Strategic Plan amendment (Item 20) was approved in late July 2013 and will add$885,000 in funds to the project from savings on the Ygnacio Valley Road Project. As a result,City staff is preparing a letter to CCTA requesting authorization to expend these additionalfunds. The letter is in draft and is expected to be at CCTA shortly.
Issues/Areas of Concern
The City is experiencing challenges related to Right-of-Way Acquisition that have delayed theproject and may increase overall costs. The City is addressing the issue of compensation toWaterworld. Impacts to the project will depend on negotiations with Waterworld based onthe loss of parking spaces caused by the project.
Based on extended comment periods requiring design changes from County Flood Control, aswell as additional ROW exhibits/issues for County Flood Control, the designer is currently outof funding. The City is exploring other possibilities of funding in addition to Measure funding.
2 -9
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 10
f. Pacheco Boulevard Widening (1216/24003) – No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure C/Measure J
Lead Agency Contra Costa County
Project Description Widening of Pacheco Boulevard from Blum Road to Arthur Road inthe Martinez area to provide a two-way center left-turn lane andbicycle lanes.
Current Project Phase Environmental clearance (has begun, but is currently on hold).
Project Status
Measure C funds were used to environmentally clear a portion of the project near theRailroad overcrossing and acquire part of the right-of-way. The City of Martinez is expected tobegin the environmental clearance in fall 2013 for the segment between Arnold Drive andSunrise Drive.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Project has a funding shortfall and requires coordination with the State to replace the railroadovercrossing. $4.9 million is allocated for the project in the 2011 Measure J Strategic Plan.
g. Martinez Intermodal Station – Phase 3 (4002/27001)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C/Measure J
Lead Agency City of Martinez
Project Description Project acquired land north of the railroad tracks to construct newroad access to the north parking lot, add 425 parking spaces, build apedestrian bridge over the tracks and construct a vehicle bridgeover Alhambra Creek to provide a second connection to the parkingfacility near Berrellesa Street.
Current Project Phase Design, Right-of-Way and Construction.
2 -10
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 11
Project Status
Design of the parking lot is underway and scheduled for completion in early 2014. At thistime, two existing warehouses will be incorporated into the design. The City has acquired thenecessary right-of-way parcel for the construction of the vehicle bridge over Alhambra Creek.Construction of the parking lot began in July. The City requested Measure J fundsappropriation for construction of the parking lot. The City is coordinating design andpermitting requirements for other project elements, including the Ferry Street entrance, therailroad pedestrian overcrossing and the vehicular bridge over Alhambra Creek with the EastBay Regional Park District, the Union Pacific Railroad and PG&E. Permitting and design isexpected to be complete in 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
h. Pacheco Transit Hub (2210)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C
Lead Agency CCCTA/City of Martinez
Project Description Construction of a transit hub at Pacheco Boulevard and Blum Road.The project will relocate and expand the existing Park & Ride lot toprovide 116 parking spaces and 6 bus bays for express and local busservice.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The City of Martinez opened construction contract bids on May 30, 2013. The City awardedthe contract to Bay Cities Paving and Grading, Inc. in July. The project schedule showsconstruction completion to occur in spring 2014. A groundbreaking ceremony was held onSeptember 4, 2013 at 10:00 am.
A construction change order is being produced that will add electric vehicle charging stationsto the project.
Issues/Areas of Concern None
2 -11
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 12
i. Interstate 680 / State Route 4 Interchange Improvements – SR 4 Widening (Phase 3) (6001)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J, Measure C, STIP
Lead Agency Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Project Description The Project will widen SR4 in the median to provide a third generalpurpose lane and shoulder in each direction from Morello Avenueto SR242, a distance of about four miles. The improvements wouldadd capacity in both directions on SR 4 including the I-680/SR4Interchange. Work includes widening of bridges within projectlimits.
Current Project Phase Environmental Revalidation and Design.
Project Status
Regularly scheduled PDT meetings will begin in November. Caltrans has provided initialconcurrence to the traffic analysis methodology. Submittal A for aerial mapping was providedto Caltrans. The project is proceeding with critical path project field activities that includesetting flight markers for the entire length of the project. Initial environmental scopingdiscussions with Caltrans indicate that environmental revalidation will be the appropriatecourse.
Issues/Areas of Concern
A Project Change Request (PCR) is in process with Caltrans to segment the project to work onPhase 3 first. Caltrans will not provide oversight until the PCR is complete. This couldpotentially impact the project schedule.
j. SR242/Clayton Road Ramps (6002/6004) – No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description The project will provide operational improvements near ClaytonRoad and SR242 to improve circulation within the Concord CentralBusiness Area. Improvements may include constructing an on-rampand associated acceleration/weaving lane to northbound SR242near the intersection of Clayton Road and Market Street in Concord
2 -12
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 13
and an off-ramp and associated deceleration lane from southboundSR242 near Clayton Road.
Current Project Phase Project Approval/Environmental Documentation (PA/ED).
Project Status
The PSR/PDS was signed May 24, 2013. The environmental phase has been initiated andmeetings are ongoing with Caltrans. A consultant contract amendment for project approvaland environmental documentation was approved in July 2013. A meeting was held on June19, 2013 at Concord City Hall to inform Concord local businesses about the project.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Project has a funding shortfall.
k. I-680 Southbound HOV Gap Closure (8001)
CCTA Fund Source Regional Measure 2, Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description The project will add an HOV lane on southbound I-680 betweenNorth Main Street in Walnut Creek and Livorna Road in Alamo, atotal of more than five miles. When complete, I-680 will have acontinuous HOV lane in the southbound direction of I-680 fromMartinez to the Alameda County line.
Current Project Phase Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED).
Project Status
CCTA is working with Caltrans to finalize both the Draft Environmental Document and theDraft Project Report. Caltrans is continuing its work to secure approval of the designexceptions and other attachments needed for approval of the Draft Project Report. Sign offon both documents is anticipated in mid-October, then the Draft Environmental documentwill be circulated for public comment. The Public Meeting will then take place in lateOctober/early November. Staff continues work to finalize the contract with the consultantselected to develop the Plans, Specifications and Estimate for this project in combination withthe I-680 Express Lane Conversion Project.
2 -13
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 14
Issues/Areas of Concern
The project has a funding shortfall caused by costs associated with the widening on themainline, ramp widening and infrastructure improvements for ramp metering, resurfacingand safety features. The preliminary geometric design accounts for the planned HighOccupancy Toll (HOT/Express) lanes that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)is authorized to operate and has begun to implement with CCTA. While combining theexpress lanes project with the Gap Closure Project provides an opportunity to reduce totalcosts, additional funds are also needed. Staff continues to meet with MTC to determine howthe scope can be reduced, the required funds will be made available, or a combination ofboth can be achieved for a fully funded, combined project.
l. Comprehensive Wayfinding System – Central County BART Stations (10001-03) – No
changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
Project Description Create and implement a cohesive, integrated wayfinding system forCentral County BART stations. This project will provide overheadand wall signage, transit information displays and real-time transitinformation at each of the four Central County BART stations.
Current Project Phase Design/Construction.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $2,600,000 for design and construction of improvements onJanuary 20, 2010. BART has released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for design, construction andinstallation of wayfinding signage at Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, Concord and North Concordstations. It is anticipated that contract will be awarded in fall 2013. Construction on allstations will be complete within 18 months of contract award.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
m. Electronic Bicycle Facility at Central County BART Stations (10001-04) – No changes from
last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
2 -14
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 15
Lead Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
Project Description This project will provide bicycle storage facilities (electronic lockers,cages, racks, etc.) at the four Central County BART stations(Concord, N. Concord, Walnut Creek and Pleasant Hill) to meetprojected 2015 demand.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $905,000 for design and construction of improvements onJanuary 20, 2010. An electronic locker contract was awarded to eLock Technologies, LLC ofBerkeley, for $2,334,384 to supply BART with approximately 1,008 lockers throughout thenext five years. For FY 14, two stations will receive additional bicycle lockers, funded entirelyor in part by Measure J funds. The stations are North Concord (8) and Walnut Creek (40).Issuing a Notice to Proceed (NTP) is anticipated in October 2013, with delivery of lockersbeginning in December 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
n. Marsh Creek Road Upgrade (24001) – No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Clayton
Project Description Widen existing two-lane roadway between Regency Drive andClayton city limits to provide two full-width travel lanes, bike lanes,shoulders and pedestrian paths.
Current Project Phase Design and Environmental Clearance.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $100,000 for design and environmental clearance activities thatinclude preliminary engineering, engineering design and environmental studies onSeptember 21, 2011. Ten or more years ago, the City approved a Specific Plan for the entirearea along Marsh Creek Road and staff is attempting to implement that plan. Aerialtopography mapping is complete. Staff is developing and evaluating typical cross-sections.
2 -15
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 16
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
o. Court Street Overcrossing – Phase 1 (24005) – No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Martinez
Project Description The project will construct a 19-foot wide bicycle, pedestrian andemergency vehicle overcrossing to span Joe DiMaggio Drive, thefour tracks of the Union Pacific Railroad and Marina Vista toconnect North Court Street (within the Martinez Waterfront Park)with Court Street at Escobar Street. The construction of thisovercrossing will provide a grade-separated crossing of the UnionPacific Railroad, improving safety and reducing congestion forpedestrian and bicycle traffic accessing the Martinez Waterfront.
This project is considered the first phase of a two-phase project.The second phase will include a parallel 28-foot wide, two-laneovercrossing that would carry vehicular traffic over Marina Vista,the Union Pacific Railroad and Joe DiMaggio Drive.
Current Project Phase Conceptual Engineering.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $200,000 for Preliminary Studies in October 2010. The Cityselected a consultant through a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to complete ascoping document for this project. Work on the scoping document began in fall 2011 and wascomplete in early 2013. The preferred alternative identified was constructing a vehicularbridge over Alhambra Creek from Berrellesa Street to the Intermodal parking lot north ofthe railroad.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
2 -16
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 17
p. Buskirk Avenue Widening – Phase 2 (24006)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Pleasant Hill
Project Description This is the final phase of a two-phase corridor improvement projectto increase capacity and improve operations, circulation andpedestrian/bike access by constructing additional travel lanes,improving signalization, alignment and pedestrian facilities. Theproject limits are from 500 feet south of Lamkin Drive toHookston Road.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The project contractor, Ghilotti Bros., Inc. has poured new roadway concrete curb along the I-680 side of Buskirk Avenue, and is constructing a new temporary pedestrian pathway behindthe curb. Saint Francis Electric continues the installation of streetlight and traffic signalconduits within the closed section of the Buskirk Avenue “S” curve. The electrical work isscheduled for completion by October 2013. Takehara Landscape, Inc. is completing theinstallation of irrigation sleeves and piping for under the roadway sections within the closedsection of Buskirk Avenue. The project is on schedule and anticipated to be complete withinthe Ghilotti’s allotted contract working days and by September of 2014. Additionalinformation is available on the City’s web page for the project at www.pleasant-hill.net/Buskirk.
The Authority appropriated $7,532,950 of Measure J funds for construction at their
November 2012 Board meeting.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
q. Contra Costa Blvd Improvements (24006)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Pleasant Hill
Project Description Contra Costa Boulevard Improvements project consists ofintersection geometry modifications, traffic signal upgrades,
2 -17
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 18
sidewalk repair or installation, ADA curb ramp installation,pavement rehabilitation, bike lane striping, median islandmodification, street light replacement and landscaping modificationalong Contra Costa Boulevard between Chilpancingo Parkway andViking Drive.
Current Project Phase Environmental Clearance and Design.
Project Status
The City recently opened seven bids for the Contra Costa Boulevard Improvements ProjectPhase I No. 02-12 on Friday, August 2, 2013 at City Hall. The lowest responsive bidder at$3,682,536.30, exceeded the project’s budget for construction by 24%. The City Council byResolution at their August 19, 2013 meeting rejected all bids with the intent to seekadditional funding sources, restructure the project bid documents, and go out to bid again inthe early 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern The project has insufficient budgeted funds.
r. Geary Road Improvements – Phase 3 (24007) - No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Pleasant Hill
Project Description The Geary Road Improvements, Phase 3 project will complete thethird and last phase of a corridor improvements project alongGeary Road. The purpose of this three-phase improvement projectis to increase operations and pedestrian/bicycle safety through theconstruction of continuous dual left-turn lanes, exclusive bike lanesand pedestrian sidewalks. Other necessary improvements, includingdrainage and street lighting, will also be included. This is acooperative project between the cities of Pleasant Hill and WalnutCreek, as the city limit line runs down the middle of Geary Road.
Current Project Phase Design.
Project Status
Environmental work and final design are complete. Construction of the project’s first phase,the Geary Road/Pleasant Hill Boulevard intersection improvements, was initiated in June/July
2 -18
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 19
2013, with construction of the subsequent phases to follow in January 2014. A peer review ofthe Phase 3, 95% PS&E was conducted on May 28, 2013. The City of Pleasant Hill hassubmitted an appropriations request for Measure J construction funds to be considered bythe Authority at the September 18 meeting.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
s. Clayton Road/Treat Boulevard/Denkinger Road Intersection Capacity Improvements
(24028) - No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Concord
Project Description The Clayton Road/Treat Boulevard/Denkinger Road IntersectionCapacity Improvements will upgrade traffic signal phasing at theintersection and widen the eastbound Treat Boulevard approach toinclude two exclusive left-turn lanes, two through-lanes and oneright-turn lane. The proposed project will improve the system-widesignal coordination along Clayton Road during peak periods.
Current Project Phase Design and Right-of-Way.
Project Status
The Authority approved a request for appropriation at their July 18, 2012 meeting for$432,600 to cover Environmental Clearance, Design Services, Right-of-Way Services andproportional administrative costs for the project.
A Phase II City County Engineering Advisory Committee (CCEAC) peer review of the 95% plansand specifications was held on April 23, 2013. The CCEAC recommended approval of the plansand specifications, the Technical Coordinating Committee concurred with therecommendation and the Authority approved the recommendation at their June meeting.The City is working to acquire right-of-way (ROW) and is planning to request a Measure Jappropriation for ROW funds in fall 2013. Construction is scheduled to begin in spring 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
2 -19
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 20
WEST COUNTY
t. Atlas Road Bridge Project (3111)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency East Bay Regional Park District
Project Description The project will construct a road bridge over the Union PacificRailroad in Richmond to provide access to Point Pinole RegionalShoreline. It will provide both a vehicular and a separatedpedestrian/bicycle trail connection to the shoreline.
Current Project Phase Final Design.
Project Status
The East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors approved an amendment to theengineering consultant contract for the extra work requested by the City of Richmond. The$19,000 amendment will fund the redesign of the bridge (making the trail wider and roadwaynarrower). The redesign work is expected to take approximately one month to complete. Theproject is expected to go to bid for construction by April 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Several outstanding concerns could affect the completion date and final cost of the project.Design changes by the City of Richmond have held up progress on the project for a number ofmonths. Upon completion of the design changes, it is expected that the bridge project will goto bid early in 2014 with completion by the end of 2014. The changes are not expected toaffect the final cost of the project.
u. Hercules Rail Station (4001)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J, Measure J TLC, Measure J PBTF, STIP
Lead Agency City of Hercules
Project Description Construction of the Hercules passenger rail station (includinginterim parking, station platform, signage, plazas, etc.) and track-related improvements (including retaining walls and signal
2 -20
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 21
equipment relocation). The City of Hercules now commonly refersto this project as the “Hercules Intermodal Transit Center Project”to scope the project for both rail and ferry transit service. Thismulti-modal center would unite the Amtrak intercity rail (CapitolCorridor), WestCAT local and regional busses and the WaterEmergency Transportation Authority (WETA) transbay ferry servicewith additional access for cars, pedestrians and bicyclists.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The project will be implemented in sequential phases. The fully funded initial phase of theproject will include the Path to Transit (John Muir Parkway/Bayfront Boulevard/BayfrontBridge/Refugio Creek Greenway and Creekside Trail/North Channel), the San FranciscoBay Trail and Site/Track Preparation (Grading/Utility Relocations/Retaining Walls). Phase 1Cincludes the rail station anticipated to begin construction in 2016.
The Authority appropriated $4,518,000 in programmed Measure J funds: (1) $2,162,000 ofthe funding was used for the capital cost of right-of-way acquisition and was completed onJuly 27, 2012; and (2) $2,356,000 is to be used for the capital costs of the critical roadwayaccess as the initial element of the "Path to Transit." The complete scope of the Path toTransit is now fully funded because the project will receive funding from the Measure Jprograms for Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) and for Pedestrian, Bicycle andTrail Facilities (PBTF) and include the appropriation of the balance of the Measure J funds.
The City and East Bay Regional Park District worked with Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) and Caltrans to obligate the TIGER 2 and STIP-TE funds for the San Francisco Bay TrailGap Closure Project as an element of the Hercules Intermodal Transportation Center (ITC)(ITC) Project on September 19, 2012. The site preparation work was completed in August2013. The San Francisco Bay Trail project was bid and the City Council awarded the project onJuly 23, 2013. Following award of the San Francisco Bay Trail, the City worked with thecontractor to identify value engineering items, reducing the cost by approximately $1.3m thatthe City Council acknowledged on August 20, 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the lead agency for the ITC Project, while FHWA is thelead for the San Francisco Bay Trail Project. During discussions with FHWA and Caltrans, it wasdetermined that the City should separate the bid packages, adding some complexity to the
2 -21
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 22
delivery. Additionally, the design package for John Muir Parkway/Bayfront Boulevard Bridge/Refugio Creek work will be finalized with resolution of the agency permits.
v. I-80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange (7002)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA/City of San Pablo
Project Description Reconstruction of existing interchange to provide improvedpedestrian and bicycle access.
Current Project Phase Design and right-of-way.
Project Status
Detailed design plans for Phase 1 are 95% complete and right-of-way activities are wellunderway following the execution of the right-of-way cooperative agreement betweenCaltrans, Contra Costa County, City of San Pablo and CCTA in July 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern
The project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 will relocate El Portal Drive on-ramp towestbound I-80 and reconstruct the pedestrian overcrossing that serves the RiversideElementary School and Phase 2 will reconstruct the San Pablo Dam Road interchange andbuild the McBryde Connector Road (MCR) west of I-80 (MCR). A significant funding shortfallexists to complete Phase 2. Staff is continuing to work with the West Contra Costa UnifiedSchool District (WCCUSD) to resolve the landing location of the pedestrian overcrossing. Staffis coordinating with the City of San Pablo to determine EBMUD’s liability for the relocationcost of a water main along El Portal Drive. Both issues could have cost impacts on Phase 1.
w. I-80/Central Avenue Interchange (7003) - No changes from last month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Improve overall traffic operations at the I-80/Central AvenueInterchange and along Central Avenue between Jacuzzi Street andSan Pablo Avenue.
2 -22
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 23
Current Project Phase Environmental Document for the Operational Improvement Project.
Project Status
Two projects were identified from a feasibility study completed in July 2009. The first projectis operational improvements to close the Central Avenue westbound traffic movement ontothe I-80 southbound on-ramp during weekend peak hours and reroute traffic to the adjacentI-580 eastbound on-ramp. The project obtained California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and (National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearance in July 2012. Staff presented thisproject to the Richmond City Council in April 2012. The Richmond City Council requested staffto do more outreach work with the project’s adjacent neighborhood councils. Staff met withneighborhoods and businesses in May, June and July 2012 to get project support and toanswer questions about the project. Staff continues to address comments and questions fromRichmond Annex neighborhood groups working closely with staff from Caltrans, City ofRichmond and City of El Cerrito. Staff intends to return to the City Council after all theoutreach effort is complete to update the Council on the effort and to request the Council’sagreement to proceed with the project. Design is rescheduled to follow in fall 2013 andconstruction will be scheduled for winter 2013/2014.
The second project identified in the feasibility study is a road realignment project that wouldconnect Pierce Street and San Mateo Street south of Central Avenue to enable some trafficenhancements, including adjusting the spacing of traffic lights on Central Avenue. The projectwill be led by one or both of the cities of El Cerrito and Richmond.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Some concerns have been raised about environmental and traffic issues for both projects.These issues have been addressed in the environmental document studies for the OperationalImprovement project and will be considered in the environmental document for the secondproject.
2 -23
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 24
x. Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (7005)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency Alameda County Transportation Commission(Alameda CTC)/CCTA/Caltrans
Project Description Utilize state-of-the-practice Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)technologies to enhance the effectiveness of the existingtransportation along I-80, San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials inAlameda and Contra Costa counties between the Carquinez Bridgeand the Bay Bridge. The project funding plan includesProposition 1B Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA)funds and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP) funds.
Current Project Phase Construction and Final Design.
Project Status
The project consists of six construction and procurement contracts:
• Sub-project #1 - Software & Systems: Integration (SI); work began in January 2013 andwill continue through summer 2015.
• Sub-project #2 - Specialty Materials Procurement; work began in December 2012 and willcontinue through spring 2014.
• Sub-project #3 - Traffic Operations Systems (TOS); construction began in June 2011 andwas completed in August 2012.
• Sub-project #4 - Adaptive Ramp Metering (ARM); construction began in December 2012and will be complete in summer 2014. Ramp closures and detours are currently beingimplemented at night to install the metering wiring and equipment.
• Sub-project #5 - Active Traffic Management (ATM); construction began in January 2013and will continue through winter 2014.
• Sub-project #6 - San Pablo Corridor and Arterial Improvements; construction began inSeptember 2011 and will be completed in late summer 2013.
2 -24
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 25
All jurisdictions along the corridor have approved the project Operation and MaintenanceMemorandum of Understanding (MOU). On May 23, 2012, the CTC approved allocation ofremaining CMIA funds for project.
Project partners are currently working on project documents that will govern theimplementation of the project, including an operations and maintenance plan, incidentresponse plan, system integration plan, configuration management plan, public outreachplans and a signal timing flush plan.
A project website is now available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/projects/80icm/
Issues/Areas of Concern
Caltrans is not able to advertise for a communications consultant.
y. Marina Bay Parkway Grade Separation (9003)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of Richmond
Project Description The project will construct a roadway undercrossing at theintersection of Marina Bay Parkway and BNSF/UP railroad tracksbetween Regatta Boulevard and Meeker Avenue in the City ofRichmond. The undercrossing will replace an existing at-gradecrossing.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The City awarded the contract to Gordon N. Ball, Inc. for an amount not to exceed
$27,382,470.10 on June 18, 2013. Construction commenced on July 8, 2013, beginning with
utility relocation work. Additionally, a Deep Soil Mix (“DSM”) wall test section was
successfully placed on July 25, 2013. The groundbreaking ceremony was held August 23,
2013, and Marina Bay Parkway was closed to traffic on September 3, 2013. The roadway is to
remain closed for approximately 18-20 months. Utility relocation work continues and DSM
production started in September2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
2 -25
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 26
z. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and Access Improvements at El Cerrito Plaza and del
Norte BART Stations (Project 10002-01)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
Project Description The project proposes to develop concept plans and cost estimatesto upgrade, modernize, and improve the appearance of theEl Cerrito Plaza and El Cerrito del Norte BART stations to improveefficiency, conserve energy, promote alternative access modes andgenerally enhance the customer experience at these stations.
Current Project Phase Preliminary Engineering.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $125,000 for preliminary engineering on April 17, 2013. The
project is 75% complete and is planned for completion by December 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
aa. Electric Bicycle Facility at West County BART Stations (10002-03) - No Changes from Last
Month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
Project Description This project will provide bicycle storage facilities (electronic lockers,cages, racks, etc.) at the three West County BART stations (El CerritoPlaza, El Cerrito del Norte and Richmond) to meet projected2015 demand.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $402,000 for design and construction of improvements on
January 20, 2010. An electronic locker contract was awarded to eLock Technologies, LLC of
Berkeley for $2,334,384 to supply BART with approximately 1,008 lockers throughout the next
2 -26
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 27
five years. For FY 14, the El Cerrito Plaza station will receive 24 additional bicycle lockers,
funded entirely or in part by Measure J funds. The issuance of the Notice to Proceed is
anticipated in October 2013, with delivery of lockers beginning in December 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
bb. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and Access Improvements at El Cerrito Plaza and del
Norte BART Stations (Project 10002-01)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency City of El Cerrito
Project Description The project proposes to develop concept plans and cost estimatesto upgrade, modernize and improve the appearance of theEl Cerrito Plaza and El Cerrito del Norte BART stations to improveefficiency, conserve energy, promote alternative access modes andgenerally enhance the customer experience at these stations.
Current Project Phase Preliminary Engineering.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $125,000 for preliminary engineering on May 15, 2013. The City is
finalizing the Scope of Work and contract with the consultant (MIG and Fehr & Peers) to
complete the project’s tasks. The City anticipates completing the access and transportation
analyses by fall 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
cc. Comprehensive Wayfinding System for West Contra Costa BART Stations (10002-05) - NoChanges from Last Month
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
Project Description Create and implement a cohesive, integrated wayfinding system forWest County BART stations. This project will provide overhead and
2 -27
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 28
wall signage, transit information displays and real time transitinformation at each of the three West County BART stations.
Current Project Phase Design.
Project Status
The Authority appropriated $1,600,000 for design and construction of improvements on
January 20, 2010. BART has released an RFP for design, construction and installation of
wayfinding signage at Richmond, El Cerrito del Norte, and El Cerrito Plaza stations. It is
anticipated that contract will be awarded in fall 2013. Construction on all stations will be
complete within 18 months of contract award.
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
EAST COUNTY
dd. SR4 Widening Railroad Avenue to Loveridge Road (1405)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description State Route 4 was widened to four lanes in each direction (includingHOV lanes) from approximately one mile west of Railroad Avenueto approximately ¾ mile west of Loveridge Road. The project alsoprovided a median for future mass transit.
Current Project Phase Highway Landscaping & Plant Establishment Period – Complete.
Project Status
Landscaping of the freeway mainline began in December 2009 and was complete inJune 2010. A three-year plant establishment and maintenance period, as required by theCooperative Agreement with Caltrans, was complete on June 24, 2013. Caltrans has acceptedthe project and has taken over the maintenance responsibilities. The CCTA Board acceptedthe completed construction contract, approved the final contractor progress payment,approved the release of the retention funds to the contractor, and authorized staff to closeconstruction Contract No. 241 at its September 18, 2013 meeting.
2 -28
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 29
Issues/Areas of Concern None.
ee. SR4 Widening: Loveridge Road to Somersville Road (1406/3003)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C/Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description SR4 widening from two to four lanes in each direction (includingHOV Lanes) between Loveridge Road and Somersville Road. Theproject provides a median for future mass transit.
Current Project Phase SR4 mainline construction.
Project Status
Construction of the SR4 mainline and Loveridge Road widening began in June 2010. Theproject completion target is early 2014.
Construction along Loveridge Road is nearly complete with the exception of the intersectionof Loveridge Road and the eastbound SR4 off-ramp to Loveridge Road. This intersection andthe final configuration of the off-ramp is anticipated to be completed in October 2013.
The primary activities along the SR4 mainline consist of construction of the new inside trafficlanes in the eastbound and westbound directions adjacent to the new median area, as well asconstruction of the median eBART concrete barriers.
The project construction is approximately 91% complete.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Discussions were successful to determine methods to accelerate the work and the newproject completion target is early 2014.
2 -29
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 30
ff. SR4 Widening: Somersville Road to SR160 (1407/3001)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C/Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description State Route 4 will be widened from two to four lanes in eachdirection (including HOV Lanes) from Somersville Road toHillcrest Avenue and six lanes to SR160, including a wide median fortransit. The project includes the reconstruction of the SomersvilleRoad Interchange, Contra Loma/L Street Interchange, G StreetOvercrossing, Lone Tree Way/A Street Interchange,Cavallo Undercrossing and Hillcrest Avenue Interchange.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
The project is divided into four segments: 1) Somersville Interchange; 2) Contra LomaInterchange and G Street Overcrossing; 3A) A Street Interchange and Cavallo Undercrossing;and 3B) Hillcrest Avenue to SR160.
Segment 1 - Somersville Interchange
Construction and punchlist work is continuing along both the north and south sides of thefreeway on all remaining sections of sound walls and any finishing work on retaining wallsthat have the Delta Region Native Landscape Architectural Treatment. Other work inSeptember included completion of remaining freeway paving and eBART work in the medianarea. Construction of the two remaining bridges, mainline eastbound, and eBART, has been
completed. Final punchlist work on these bridges, including items such as slope paving andother finish details around the bridges, has commenced. Major traffic switchovers, theeastbound traffic switch onto the new bridge, and the westbound traffic onto the newauxiliary lanes between Contra Loma and Somersville, has occurred. Work continues on thereconstruction and widening of Somersville Road, including final installation and startup ofnew traffic signals.
2 -30
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 31
Segment 1 construction is approximately 95 % complete.
Segment 2 - Contra Loma Interchange and G Street Overcrossing
Construction of the Segment 2 widening began in March 2012 and is anticipated to becomplete in summer 2015.
Retaining wall and sound wall construction, north and south of the freeway, east and west ofG Street have continued, along with associated Cast-In-Drilled-Holes (CIDH) piles, soil nailwalls, and footing excavation.
Drainage system construction is in progress with excavation, wall and tie-in construction, andreinforced concrete box placement.
Construction of the new Contra Loma Undercrossing Bridge continued in September withabutment footing and wall construction, Cast-in-Drilled Hole (CIDH) piling construction,column and bent cap construction and falsework installation.
Construction of the northbound eastern half of the new G Street Bridge over SR4 is wellunderway, with abutment backfill, abutment barrier rail and approach slab work inSeptember.
Placement of Lean Concrete Base (LCB) and Jointed Plane Concrete Pavement (JPCP) for theeastbound outside mainline near and under G Street continued in September.
Local Street construction is in progress at Lemon Tree and Buchannan.
Segment 2 construction is approximately 50% complete, through September 2013..
Segment 3A - A Street Interchange and Cavallo Undercrossing
Construction of the Segment 3A began in August 2012 and is anticipated to be complete insummer 2015.
During the month of September, project work has continued with construction of masonryblock soundwall along the eastbound mainline up to the Hillcrest Ave off-ramp.
The A Street Bridge construction is continuing with abutment wall construction and structurebackfill work, testing of CIDH piles and column construction. Barrier rail and masonry blocksoundwall work continued.
2 -31
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 32
Retaining wall and soundwall construction is progressing at multiple locations. Burrowingowls were relocated in conformance with permit requirements and nesting areas were rippedto prevent owls from returning.
At Lone Tree Way, Tregallas Road, Cavallo Road and Drake Street, electrical work, sidewalk,curb and gutter, and local street construction continued.
Segment 3A construction is approximately 37% complete through September 2013.
Segment 3B - Hillcrest Avenue to SR160
An NTP was issued with March 14, 2013, as the first working day. Construction is anticipatedto be complete in November 2015.
Construction of Retaining Walls 5 and 7 along the south of SR4 and East of Hillcrest Ave isprogressing well. RW 5 is complete; backfill and barrier rail work is in progress. At RW 7, wallconstruction, tie-downs and backfill work is in progress.
Eastbound mainline construction work is continuing with roadway excavation, crushedconcrete base and place aggregate subbase. Soundwall construction along the southeastmainline is commencing with CIDH piling work.
At the SR4 Eastbound Off-Ramp, backfill and tie-in of minor drainage structures to themodular storm drain system is in progress.
Hillcrest Avenue widening construction is continuing; abutment walls and bent columns areunder construction. Soil nails, tiebacks and concrete face of wall underneath the southabutment are under construction.
Retaining wall construction at the eastbound off ramp and westbound on-ramp is startingwith excavation and shoring for piling, ground anchor installation, footing and wallconstruction starting.
Temporary traffic control at Hillcrest Avenue is in place, including maintenance of striping, K-rail and construction area signs.
Relocation of the City of Antioch 16” waterline is complete. Tie-in to the existing line andbackfill work is completed.
At the north side of the project, east of Hillcrest Ave, drainage work is continuing. A portion ofexisting large diameter pipe is being abandoned in place. Permanent and temporary drainage
2 -32
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 33
systems necessary to provide proper drainage for the upcoming rainy season are underconstruction along the north side of the highway and throughout the project.
Segment 3B construction is approximately 19% complete through September 2013.
The jack and bore pipe work under the freeway is complete. The jacking pit was changed fromthe north to the south side of the highway to avoid a conflict with the existing storm drain onthe north side. Associated drainage facilities are under construction.
At the Hillcrest Avenue overcrossing abutments, the existing slope paving was removed toprepare the site for CIDH piles and the footing construction for the bridge widening.Abutment footings and abutments are being constructed. At Bent 2, large diameter CIDH pileshave been constructed.
The interface with Segment 3A is being reviewed to identify traffic staging, paving anddrainage issues. No issues that will significantly affect the project have been identified.
Segment 3B construction is approximately 16% complete through August 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Segment One - Somersville Interchange
None.
Segment 2 - Contra Loma Interchange and G Street Overcrossing
Caltrans has approved a plan to recover contractor owned delays on the project. Thecontractor has modified the planned order of work at Contra Loma Boulevard and the rampsto allow ramp work to continue without completing local street work and modify the mainlinestaging work near G Street. The revised schedule will prevent construction from extendinginto an additional construction season, which will allow the project to be finished by thecontract completion date.
A construction change order (CCO No. 44) was written for costs associated with removal ofexisting concrete pavement where existing asphalt pavement was shown on the drawings.Additional work in the amount of $448,295 and a seven working day time extension wasapproved by Caltrans with CCTA concurrence.
2 -33
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 34
Segment 3A - A Street Interchange and Cavallo Undercrossing
Burrowing owls previously discovered within the project limits have been relocated and theirburrows removed. There were significant impacts to the retaining wall work on the project,however, the construction management team has managed to mitigate most of the cost andschedule impacts due to the owls.
The native material does not meet the R-value requirements of 20 specified in the contract.Revised pavement structural sections based on an R-value of 10 or other resolution to bringR-values up has been made. A CCO will be written to provide revised pavement sections.
Segment 3B - Hillcrest Avenue to SR160
Relocation of a 16-inch diameter pipe belonging to the City of Antioch) has been completed.
Segments 0, 1, 2, 3A, and 3B
BART has requested that BART Safety and Security Certification requirements be included aspart of the sign-off and hand-over of the completed eBART work. Discussion is ongoingregarding requirements for construction, documentation and survey of the eBart work toensure conformance with the eBART SSC requirements.
gg. East County Rail Extension (eBART) (2104/2001)
CCTA Fund Source Measure C/Measure J
Lead Agency BART/CCTA
Project Description Implement rail transit improvements in the State Route 4 corridorfrom the Pittsburg Bay Point station in the west to a station inAntioch near Hillcrest in the east.
2 -34
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 35
Current Project Phase Final Design and Construction.
Project Status
BART is the lead agency for this phase. Construction of the Transfer Platform and eBARTFacilities (Contract 110) in the median to Railroad Avenue is continuing. Construction of theparking lot and maintenance facilities for the Antioch Station (Contract 120) is well underway.
The overall construction work for Contract 110 is 95% complete. Installation of the traincontrol and communication systems continues. Testing will be the final phase.
Most of the work is complete for the parking lot area for Contract 120. Curb and gutter, aswell as the bus shelters, are currently being worked on. Paving of the lot will occur in lateSeptember/October. The foundation footings for the maintenance building are complete. Thecontractor is currently working on utilities and structural steel work for the building.
Coordination between BART and CCTA is ongoing because the construction is directly northand adjacent to the Segment 3B construction area. A master integrated schedule has beendeveloped for the eBART and SR4 construction contracts.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Coordination of SR4 highway construction contracts and eBART contracts continues. BART,MTC and CCTA have developed a strategy to fund the design of the Pittsburg Railroad eBARTstation for possible inclusion in Contract 130, the rail contract.
hh. SR4/SR160 Connector Ramps (5001)
Project Fund Source Bridge Toll Funds
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Complete the two missing movements between SR4 and SR160,specifically the westbound SR4 to northbound SR160 ramp and thesouthbound SR160 to eastbound SR4 ramp.
Current Project Phase Final Design.
2 -35
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 36
Project Status
Caltrans has approved the final plans and the right-of-way certification. The constructioncontract is scheduled to begin construction advertisement in late September 2013. UnionPacific Railroad (UPRR) approved the design in early August 2013 and review of theConstruction and Maintenance Agreement with UPRR is underway. The California PublicUtilities Commission (CPUC) approved the new crossings application on September 5, 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern
The Project requires a Construction and Maintenance (C&M) Agreement with the UnionPacific Railroad, which was submitted with the 95% plans. The project will be advertised witha contractor restricted work-around the railroad areas until the C&M approval is completed.
ii. SR4 Mokelumne Trail Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing (portion of Project 5002)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Construct a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing near theMokelumne Trail at SR4. The overcrossing will include a multi-spanbridge with columns in the SR4 median. Bridge approaches will beconstructed on earthen embankments. The path width isanticipated to be 12 feet wide.
Current Project Phase Design.
Project Status
Geotechnical work along with the 35% plans are complete. The City of Brentwood is reviewingthe plans before they are submitted to Caltrans for approval.
BART announced that the recommended new station location for a future eBART extensionshould be at a location adjacent to the pedestrian overcrossing. Impacts of this decision willneed to be considered.
2 -36
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 37
Issues/Areas of Concern
Construction funding for the project has not yet been identified.
ii. SR4 Widen to 4 Lanes – Laurel Road to Sand Creek Road & Sand Creek Road Interchange –
Phase 1 (5002 & 5003)
CCTA Fund Source Measure J and East Contra Costa Regional Fee and FinanceAuthority (ECCRFFA)
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description Widen SR4 from two to four lanes (two lanes in each direction) fromLaurel Road to Sand Creek Road and construct the Sand CreekInterchange. The interchange will have diamond ramps in allquadrants with the exception of the southwest quadrant.
Current Project Phase Construction.
Project Status
Substantial bridgework on the four bridges of the project; the Lone Tree Way Undercrossing,the Sand Creek Bridge, the Sand Creek Road Undercrossing, and the San Jose AvenueUndercrossing has been completed. Contract roadway construction continues. Electricalsystem installation and drainage system installation continues. Lean Concrete Base (LCB)placement and Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Rubberized HMA pavement for stage 1(Eastbound) is substantially complete. Partial traffic switch to the newly built eastbound laneshappened in August, and stage 2 construction is progressing with earthwork, paving andother operations. Full switch of traffic to the newly built eastbound lanes is scheduled for lateOctober 2013.
Issues/Areas of Concern
The Authority approved moving forward with a CCO to construct the second Sand Creek RoadOvercrossing in this contract. Current initial discussions have begun involving the Authority,the SR4 Bypass Authority, ECCRFA, Project Designer, Caltrans and the Contractor to developthe best schedule to do this work. Widening of the Sand Creek Bridge is also subject to thisadditional CCO. 65% plans have been completed and submitted for comment. Theauthorization of this work would extend the project completion from April 2014 toDecember 2104.
2 -37
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 38
jj. SR4 Balfour Road Interchange – Phase 1 (5005)
CCTA Fund Source East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Finance Authority (ECCRFFA)
Lead Agency CCTA
Project Description The Phase 1 project will include a new SR4 bridge crossing overBalfour Road providing one southbound and one northbound lanefor SR4; northbound and southbound SR4 loop on-ramps, servicingboth westbound and eastbound Balfour Road traffic; andnorthbound and southbound SR4 diagonal off-ramps.
Current Project Phase Design.
Project Status
Project Development Team (PDT) meetings with Caltrans are occurring on a monthly basis. InJuly 2013, the Authority approved an amendment to the Kinder Morgan agreement for designservices to relocate the existing petroleum booster pump station in the interchange area. ALongitudinal Utility Exception Request from Caltrans for Contra Costa Water District (CCWD)to leave a 90-inch water line within the project limits in place has been tentatively approved,saving taxpayers an estimated $18 million. The designer is currently working on the mappingand geometric approval drawings. The structural type selection meeting occurred on July 30,2013. Design is anticipated to be complete in late 2014.
Issues/Areas of Concern
Because of the slowdown in building in East County, ECCRFFA construction funding for theproject has been delayed and an alternative construction-funding source has yet to be
identified.
2 -38
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 39
2. Completed Projects
SOUTHWEST COUNTY
Measure C
1104 I-680/Stone Valley Road I/C, 1998
1105 I-680/El Cerro Boulevard I/C Ramp Signalization, 1994
1106 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes Segments 1 & 3, 2007
1107 I-680/Fostoria Way Overcrossing, 1994
1600 Moraga Rd. Safety Improvements, 2005
1602 Camino Pablo Carpool Lots, 1996
1607 Moraga Way at Glorietta Boulevard & Camino Encinas, 2001
1608 Moraga Way Safety Improvements, 2002
1609 Moraga Way /Ivy Dr. Roadway Improvements, 2004
1611 Mt. Diablo Corridor Improvements, 2001
1612 Moraga Rd. Corridor Improvements, 2005
1621 St. Mary’s Rd. – Phase 2, 1999
1622 Moraga Rd. Structural & Safety Imp., 2005
1624 Bryant Way/Moraga Way Improvements, 2005
1625/1625SW Moraga Way Rehabilitation & Improvements, 2011
1711 St. Mary’s Rd. Improvements, 1995
1715 San Ramon Valley Boulevard Imp. – Phase 1, 1996
1716 Stone Valley Rd. Circulation Improvements, 2003
1717 Camino Tassajara Circulation Improvements, 2004
1718 Crow Canyon Rd. Improvements, 2001
1719 Sycamore Valley Rd. Improvements, 2008
1720 San Ramon Valley Boulevard Widening – Phase 1, 1997
1801 Camino Pablo (San Pablo Dam Corridor), 1996
2206 I-680/Sycamore Valley Road Park & Ride, 1998
2209 San Ramon Intermodal Transit Facility, 1996
2 -39
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 40
3101 Iron Horse Trail – Monument to Alameda County Line, 1994
3103 Reliez Valley Road Trail – Phase 2, 2003
3106 St. Stephens/Bryant Way Trail, 1998
CENTRAL COUNTY
Measure C
1101 I-680/Burnett Ave. Ramps, 1995
1103 I-680/North Main Street Bypass, 1996
1108 Route 242/Concord Ave. Interchange, 1997
1113 Route 242 Widening, 2001
1116 I-680 HOV Lanes, 2005
1117 I-680/SR4 Interchange, 2009
1203 Alhambra Avenue Widening, 2011
1205 Taylor Boulevard /Pleasant Hill Rd./Alhambra Rd. Intersection Imp., 2000
1209 South Broadway Extension, 1996
1210 Monument Boulevard/Contra Costa Boulevard/ Buskirk Ave. Imp., 1996
1215 Geary Rd. Improvements, 2002
1217 Bancroft/Hookston Intersection, 2004
1218 Buskirk Ave. Improvements, 2005
1219 Iron Horse Trail Crossing at Treat Boulevard, 2010
1220 Ygnacio Valley Rd. Slide Repair, 2008
1221 Contra Costa Blvd Signal Coordination 2009
2208 Martinez Intermodal Facility – Phase 1, 2001
2208 Martinez Intermodal Facility - Phase 2, 2006
2296 Martinez Bay Trail, 2007
3102 Walnut Creek Channel to CC Shoreline Trail, 2001
2 -40
PROJECT STATUS REPORTSeptember 30, 2013
Page 41
Measure J
8002 I-680 Southbound Carpool Lane Extension (restripe), Nov 2011
24027 Ygnacio Valley Road Permanent Restoration – Phase 2
24029 Old Marsh Creek Road Overlay, 2010
WEST COUNTY
Measure C
1300 Richmond Parkway, 1996
1501 SR4 (W) Gap Closure – Phase 1, 2002
1503 SR4 (W) Willow Ave. Overcrossing, 1996
2302 Richmond Transit Village BART Parking Structures (2302)
2303 Hercules Transit Center, 2009
Measure J
9001 Richmond Parkway Upgrade Study, 2008
EAST COUNTY
Measure C
1401 SR4 (E) Willow Pass Grade Lowering, 1995
1402 SR4 (E) Bailey Rd. Interchange, 1996
1403 SR4 (E) Bailey Rd. to Railroad Ave., 2001
2101 BART Extension to Pittsburg/Bay Point, 1996
3110 Marsh Creek Trail Overcrossing at SR4, 1997
3112 Big Break Regional Trail, 2010
Measure J
5006 Vasco Road Safety Improvements Project – Phase 1, 2011
5010 SR4 Bypass: Segments 1 and 3, 2008
2 -41
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTMeeting Date: October 17, 2013
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\03 - Fund Summary BL.docx
Subject Funding Summary
Summary of Issues This report updates application deadlines for potential funding sources
and updates successful application results.
Recommendations None – for information only.
Financial Implications None
Options
Attachments A. Funding Summary
Changes from
Committee
3 -1
Up
com
ing
Fun
din
gO
pp
ort
un
itie
s
htt
p:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/fu
nd
ing/
new
_fre
edo
m.h
tm
FUN
DIN
GSU
MM
AR
YR
EPO
RT-
10
/17
/13
Pro
gram
and
Co
nta
ctIn
foFu
nd
Sou
rce
Ap
plic
atio
n
De
adlin
es
Fun
din
gP
rogr
am
Dre
nn
enSh
elto
n(5
10
)8
17
-59
09
,Kri
sten
Maz
ur
(51
0)
81
7-5
78
9
FTA
New
Free
do
m
Gra
nt
Pro
gram
-
Larg
eu
rban
ized
area
s
Fed
eral
1/3
/20
14
PU
C-H
igh
way
-Rai
l
Gra
de
Sep
arat
ion
Esta
blis
hP
rio
rity
List
for
fisc
alye
ar
14
/15
&1
5/1
6
Stat
e1
0/2
5/2
01
3h
ttp
://w
ww
.cp
uc.
ca.g
ov/
PU
C/s
afet
y/R
ail/
Cro
ssin
gs/f
un
din
g.h
t
m
Bay
Are
aA
QM
gmt
Dis
tric
tB
ike
rack
Vo
uch
ers
htt
p:/
/ww
w.b
aaq
md
.go
v/D
ivis
ion
s/St
rate
gic-
Ince
nti
ves/
Alt
ern
ativ
e-Tr
ansp
ort
atio
n/B
RV
P.a
spx
Reg
ion
al
Firs
tC
om
e,
firs
tse
rved
un
tilJ
an.3
1,
20
14
P-T
AP
Ro
un
d1
51
0/2
1/2
01
3R
egio
nal
htt
p:/
/new
.str
eets
aver
on
line.
com
/fo
rms/
pta
p1
5ap
plic
atio
n
3 -2
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Cli
mat
eIn
itia
tive
s
Gra
nts
-M
TC
FS
CT
A/R
CP
A/
$1
,50
0,0
00
7/3
0/2
01
1ht
tp:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/p
lann
ing/
clim
ate/
TA
M/C
CT
A(d
ynam
ic
rid
esh
arin
gte
chn
olo
gy
EP
AC
lim
ate
Sh
owca
se
Com
mu
nit
ies
thro
ug
h
EP
A's
Loc
alC
lim
ate
and
En
erg
yP
rog
ram
.
FT
he
Sm
all
Cit
ies
Cli
mat
eA
ctio
n
Par
tner
ship
,E
lC
erri
to,
Alb
any,
Pie
dm
on
t,an
d
San
Pab
lo
$2
3,0
00
_ht
tp:/
/ep
a.go
v/cl
eane
nerg
y/en
ergy
-pro
gram
s/st
ate-
and
-
loca
l/sh
ow
case
.htm
l
Bay
Are
aA
irD
istr
ict
(BA
AQ
MD
)C
lim
ate
Ch
ang
e(P
rote
ctio
n)
gra
nts
FE
lC
erri
to$
75
,00
0_
http
://w
ww
.baa
qm
d.g
ov/
Div
isio
ns/S
trat
egic
-
Ince
ntiv
es/C
lim
ate-
Pro
tect
ion-
Gra
nt-P
rogr
am.a
spx
Laf
ayet
te$
75
,00
0
CC
Co
un
ty$
40
,00
0
Ric
hm
on
d$
74
,98
7
R1
1/1
9/2
01
2A
vra
Go
ldm
an,
En
v.P
lan
ner
,S
trat
egic
Ince
nti
ves,
(41
5)
74
9-
50
93
,ag
old
man
@b
aaq
md
.go
v
http
://w
ww
.baa
qm
d.g
ov/
Div
isio
ns/S
trat
egic
-
Ince
ntiv
es/F
und
ing-
So
urce
s/T
FC
A/R
egio
nal-
Fun
d.a
spx
Air
Res
ourc
esB
oard
Veh
icle
Ince
nti
ve
Pro
gra
mfo
rF
Y
20
11
/20
12
RC
on
tra
Co
sta
Co
$1
8,0
00
On
goin
g
thro
ugh
Dec
emb
er
31
,2
01
2
Fu
ture
fun
din
go
pp
ort
un
itie
su
nce
rtai
n
Cli
mat
e
Ch
ang
e/E
xtr
eme
Wea
ther
Vu
lner
abil
ity
Ass
essm
ent
FT
BD
TB
D1
/22
/20
13
htt
p:/
/ww
w.f
hw
a.d
ot.
gov/
envi
ron
men
t/cl
imat
e_ch
ange
/ad
apta
tio
n/o
ngo
ing_
and
_cu
rren
t_re
sear
ch/v
uln
erab
ilit
y_as
sess
men
t_p
ilo
ts/2
01
3-2
01
4_
soli
cita
tio
n/s
oli
cita
tio
n/i
nd
ex.c
fm
Mea
sure
JP
BT
FF
Y
11
/12
-14
/15
LR
ich
mo
nd
-O
hlo
ne
Gre
enw
ayG
apC
losu
re
$3
32
,40
0S
ept.
20
11
Bra
dB
eck
atb
bec
k@cc
ta.n
et(9
25
)2
56
-47
26
.P
leas
ese
eC
CT
A
bo
ard
lett
erw
ith
pro
ject
reco
mm
end
atio
ns:
Air
Qu
alit
y
Bik
e/P
ed/T
rail
s
Bay
Are
aA
QM
D
Sh
utt
le/F
eed
erB
us
Ser
vice
and
Reg
ion
al
Rid
esh
are-
FY
13
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)2
3 -3
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yR
ich
mo
nd
-T
ran
sit
Vil
lage
Eas
tsid
e
Imp
rove
men
ts
$5
88
,00
0ht
tp:/
/ww
w.c
cta.
net/
asse
ts/d
ocu
men
ts/P
C/0
50
21
2~
PC
~A
gen
da/
05
%2
0C
CT
LC
%2
0P
BT
F.p
df
Ori
nd
a-
Laf
ayet
te
BA
RT
Way
fin
din
g&
Lig
hti
ng
$3
94
,10
0
Mar
tin
ezto
Cro
cket
t
segm
ent;
Bay
Tra
il
$1
,00
0,0
00
Wal
nu
tC
reek
-
Do
wn
tow
np
ed
con
nec
tio
ns
&b
ike
sto
rage
$3
50
,00
0
Her
cule
s-
Cre
eksi
de
Tra
ilG
apC
losu
re
$6
00
,00
0
Pit
tsb
urg
-F
ron
tage
Ro
adC
lass
1p
ath
$5
2,0
00
Co
nco
rd-
Fra
nq
uet
te
Ped
/Bik
etr
ail
con
nec
tio
np
roje
ct
$4
70
,00
0
CC
Co
un
ty-
Bai
ley/
SR
4In
terc
han
gep
ed/b
ike
imp
rove
men
ts
$3
45
,30
0
Eas
tB
ayR
egio
nal
Par
k
Dis
tric
t
$9
86
,20
0
Fed
eral
Saf
eR
oute
sto
Sch
ool
(SR
TS
)–
Fed
eral
pro
gra
m
(Cy
cle
3)
FD
anvi
lle
Co
un
ty
$2
25
,50
0
$8
49
,00
0
10
/17
/20
11
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/Lo
calP
rogr
ams/
safe
rout
es/s
rts_
list
.htm
Saf
eR
oute
sto
Sch
ool
(SR
2S
)P
rog
ram
Cy
cle
10
-FY
11
/12
-12
/13
SC
CC
ou
nty
$4
50
,00
03
/30
/20
12
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/Lo
calP
rogr
ams/
safe
rout
es/s
afer
out
es.h
tm
BT
A2
01
2-1
3S
TB
DT
BD
5/3
1/2
01
2ht
tp:/
/ww
w.d
ot.
ca.g
ov/
hq/L
oca
lPro
gram
s/b
ta/B
TA
Cal
lFo
rPr
oje
cts.
htm
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)3
3 -4
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yT
DA
Art
icle
3F
Y
20
13
/14
ST
BD
TB
D1
/24
/20
13
http
://w
ww
.mtc
.ca.
gov/
fund
ing/
ST
A-T
DA
FH
WA
20
12
Dis
cret
ion
ary
Pro
gra
ms
FN
on
ein
Co
ntr
aC
ost
a
Co
un
ty,
exce
pt
for
Val
ue
Pri
cin
gP
ilo
t
Pro
gram
(see
bel
ow
)
_
1/6
/20
12
http
://w
ww
.fhw
a.d
ot.
gov/
dis
cret
iona
ry/
Del
taR
egio
n
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
Dev
elo
pm
ent
MT
C-
Lo
uis
Sch
um
anat
(51
0)
28
6-5
33
2o
rT
hel
ma
Rie
l(5
10
)
28
6-5
24
0
Fer
ryB
oat
Hig
hw
ayfo
rL
IFE
FH
WA
-A
nge
laJa
cob
s,O
ffic
eo
fO
per
atio
ns
(20
2)
36
6-0
07
6,
An
gela
.jac
ob
s@d
ot.
gov
Inn
ova
tive
Bri
dge
Res
earc
han
d
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Inte
rsta
teM
ain
ten
ance
Nat
ion
alH
isto
ric
Co
vere
dB
rid
ge
Pre
serv
atio
n
Nat
ion
alS
cen
icB
yway
s
Pu
bli
cL
and
sH
igh
way
s
Rai
lH
igh
way
Cro
ssin
g
Haz
ard
Eli
min
atio
nin
Hig
hS
pee
dR
ail
Co
rrid
ors
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
Co
mm
un
ity
and
Sys
tem
Pre
serv
atio
n
_
Pla
nn
ing
,M
ain
ten
ance
,S
afet
y,
Bri
dg
e,O
ther
TD
A&
RM
2O
per
atin
gP
rogr
amM
anag
er,
Ch
eryl
Ch
i,5
10
-81
7-
59
39
,cc
hi@
mtc
.ca.
gov
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)4
3 -5
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yT
ruck
Par
kin
gF
acil
itie
s
Val
ue
Pri
cin
gP
ilo
t
Pro
gram
Co
ntr
aC
ost
aI-
80
toll
ed-c
orr
ido
rre
al-t
ime
rid
esh
arin
g$
32
2,4
00
Pri
orit
yD
evel
opm
ent
Are
a(P
DA
)P
lan
nin
g
Pro
gra
m(C
ycl
e5
)
FT
BD
4/1
2/2
01
2ht
tp:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/p
lann
ing/
smar
t_gr
ow
th/s
tati
ons
/PD
A
/PD
A_
Pla
nnin
g_G
uid
elin
es_
Cyc
le5
_2
01
2.p
df
Cal
tran
sF
Y1
3/1
4
Fed
eral
and
Sta
te
Pla
nn
ing
Gra
nts
_ht
tp:/
/ww
w.d
ot.
ca.g
ov/
hq/t
pp
/gra
nts.
htm
l
En
viro
nm
enta
lJu
stic
eB
lesi
lda
Geb
reye
sus
(51
0)
28
6-5
57
5,
ble
sild
a_ge
bre
yesu
s@d
ot.
ca.g
ov
Co
mm
un
ity
Bas
ed
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
nP
lan
nin
g
San
Pab
lo-R
um
rill
/13
th
St
Co
rrid
or
Mo
bil
ity
Pla
n
Bec
kyF
ran
k(5
10
)2
86
-55
36
,b
ecky
_fr
ank@
do
t.ca
.go
v
Par
tner
ship
Pla
nn
ing
Sta
tew
ide/
Urb
anT
ran
sit
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
die
s
Ru
ral/
Sm
all
Urb
an
Tra
nsi
tP
lan
nin
g
Stu
die
s
Tra
nsi
tP
lan
nin
g
Stu
den
tIn
tern
ship
s
New
Fre
edom
Pro
gra
mfo
rL
arg
e
FL
afay
ette
$2
5,0
00
8/5
/20
11
http
://w
ww
.mtc
.ca.
gov/
fund
ing/
new
_fr
eed
om
.htm
CC
TA
$9
6,0
00
AC
Tra
nsi
t$
96
0,0
00
Reh
abil
itat
ion
Svc
s.
of
No
rth
ern
Cal
ifo
rnia
$6
0,2
04
MT
C/T
ran
sFor
mS
afe
Rou
tes
toT
ran
sit
Cy
cle
IV
RR
ich
mo
nd
$5
01
,82
98
/8/2
01
1ht
tp:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/p
df/
SR
2T
_C
ycle
_IV
_C
all_
for_
Pro
je
cts.
pd
f
San
dra
Pad
illa
/Tra
nsf
orm
(51
0)
74
0-3
15
0X
30
4
Tra
nsi
t/L
ivab
leC
omm
un
itie
s
F,S
4/2
/20
13
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)5
3 -6
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yN
ewF
reed
om
Pro
gra
mS
mal
l
Urb
aniz
edA
rea
FY
20
12
F_
3/2
3/2
01
2ht
tp:/
/ww
w.d
ot.
ca.g
ov/
hq/M
assT
rans
/53
17
.htm
l
Wes
tCA
T$
25
0,1
41
http
://w
ww
.mtc
.ca.
gov/
pla
nnin
g/li
feli
ne/l
ift.
htm
N.
Ric
hm
on
d$
17
2,9
00
AC
Tra
nsi
t$
92
7,0
00
Wes
tCA
T$
55
1,0
00
Tra
nsi
tO
rien
ted
Dev
elop
men
t(T
OD
)
Pro
gra
m-B
ond
Mea
sure
,P
rop
osit
ion
1C
,C
ycl
e1
RN
on
eth
iscy
cle.
An
tici
pat
etw
om
ore
rou
nd
sco
min
g!
_
Wes
tC
ou
nty
Sh
are
$6
,37
7,9
00
_B
rad
Bec
kat
bb
eck@
ccta
.net
(92
5)
25
6-4
72
6.
Ple
ase
see
CC
TA
bo
ard
lett
erw
ith
pro
ject
reco
mm
end
atio
ns:
Cen
tral
Co
un
tyS
har
e$
5,7
66
,90
0
So
uth
wes
tC
ou
nty
Sh
are
$3
,58
2.5
0
FT
AS
ecti
on5
31
0F
__
3/1
1/2
01
3
Pet
erE
nge
l,C
CT
A,
92
5-2
56
-47
41
,p
enge
l@cc
ta.n
et,
htt
p:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/fu
nd
ing/
FT
A/5
31
0.h
tm
FT
AS
ecti
on5
31
1n
on-
urb
aniz
ed
F_
_4
/5/2
01
3
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/Mas
sTra
ns/5
31
1.h
tml
FY
12
/13
,1
3/1
4
Tra
nsi
tC
apit
al
Pri
orit
ies
F,
L1
0/3
1/2
01
2G
len
Tep
ke(M
TC
),gt
epke
@m
tc.c
a.go
v,
htt
p:/
/ww
w.m
tc.c
a.go
v/fu
nd
ing/
FT
A/5
30
7-5
30
9_
20
12
-13
_to
_2
01
3-
14
.htm
Cy
cle
6H
SIP
FH
SIP
,C
ycle
57
/26
/20
13
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/Lo
calP
rogr
ams/
hsip
.htm
CC
Co
un
ty$
90
0,0
00
Joh
nC
.B
rew
ster
,P
.E.
CC
Co
un
ty$
60
0,0
00
Cal
tran
sD
istr
ict
4–
Lo
cal
Ass
ista
nce
htt
p:/
/ww
w.c
cta.
net
/ass
ets/
do
cum
ents
/PC
/05
02
12
~P
C~
Age
nd
a/0
5
%2
0C
CT
LC
%2
0P
BT
F.p
df
Exp
ecte
dgr
ant
size
is$
40
,00
0to
$6
0,0
00
.E
ligi
ble
app
lica
nts
incl
ud
ep
ub
licl
yfu
nd
edtr
ansp
ort
atio
no
per
ato
rsin
the
MT
Cre
gio
n
that
did
no
tre
ceiv
efu
nd
ing
thro
ugh
Ph
ase
Io
fth
eR
M2
Rea
l-ti
me
Tra
nsi
tIn
form
atio
nG
ran
tsex
ecu
ted
in2
00
5.
Mea
sure
JT
LC
FY
11
/12
-14
/15
Rea
lti
me
Tra
nsi
tIn
fo
Gra
nts
_
3/2
1/2
01
2
LF F
Low
Inco
me
Fle
xib
le
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
Pro
gra
m
Saf
ety
-R
oad
way
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)6
3 -7
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yE
lC
erri
to$
23
7,8
00
Off
ice:
51
0-2
86
-64
85
Ple
asan
tH
ill
$9
00
,00
0e-
mai
l:jo
hn_
bre
wst
er@
do
t.ca
.go
vC
on
cord
$2
24
,50
0
Co
nco
rd$
71
6,7
00
Co
nco
rd$
43
5,1
00
CM
IA-P
rop
1-B
S$
32
,00
0,0
00
_C
TC
qu
arte
rly
Pro
p1
Bu
pd
ate
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/tra
nsp
rog/
ctcb
oo
ks/2
01
2/0
61
2/0
34
_3
.11
_3
Q_
Pro
p1
B_
Rep
ort
.pd
f
PU
C-H
igh
way
-Rai
l
Gra
de
Sep
arat
ion
Est
abli
shP
rior
ity
Lis
t
for
fisc
aly
ear
20
12
-13
&p
ossi
bly
20
13
-14
SC
ity
of
Bre
ntw
oo
d
(Lo
ne
Tre
e
Way
/UP
RR
)
$5
,00
0,0
00
(all
oca
tio
np
end
ing
succ
essf
ul
CP
UC
awar
d)
10
/21
/11
(Eve
rytw
o
year
s)
http
://d
ocs
.cp
uc.c
a.go
v/W
OR
D_
PD
F/F
INA
L_
DE
CIS
ION
/1
69
69
6.P
DF
TIG
ER
5(F
Y2
01
3)
F_
_6
/3/2
01
3ht
tp:/
/ww
w.d
ot.
gov/
site
s/d
ot.
dev
/fil
es/d
ocs
/Fin
al%
20
TIG
ER
%2
0N
OF
A%
20
for%
20
TIG
ER
%2
0W
ebsi
te_
22
Ap
ril%
20
20
1
3.p
df
Hig
hw
ayR
ailr
oad
Cro
ssin
gS
afet
y
Acc
oun
t(H
RC
SA
)-
20
12
Cal
lfo
rp
roje
cts
Pro
p1
BP
rog
ram
SC
ity
of
Ric
hm
on
d
(Mar
ine
Bay
Pkw
y
Gra
de
Sep
)
$1
8,9
75
,00
07
/1/2
01
2ht
tp:/
/ww
w.d
ot.
ca.g
ov/
hq/t
rans
pro
g/ct
cbo
oks
/20
12
/06
12
/03
4
_3
.11
_3
Q_
Pro
p1
B_
Rep
ort
.pd
f
Bri
dg
esid
enti
fied
for
SA
nti
och
$9
17
,60
0_
CT
Cq
uart
erly
Pro
p1
Bup
dat
e
Pro
pos
itio
n1
BS
eism
ic
Bon
dM
atch
Co
nco
rd$
50
6,9
28
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/tra
nsp
rog/
ctcb
oo
ks/2
01
2/0
61
2/0
34
_3
.11
_3
Q_
Pro
p1
B_
Rep
ort
.pd
fO
rin
da
$1
44
,00
0
Ori
nd
a$
11
,92
9
Pit
tsb
urg
$5
7,4
00
Bri
dg
eT
olls
RS
R4
/SR
16
0
Inte
rch
ange
&
Co
nn
ecto
rs
$5
0,0
00
,00
0_
Maj
orP
roje
cts
CC
TA
-S
R4
/San
d
Cre
ekIn
terc
han
ge,
SR
4w
iden
ing
(Lo
ne
Tre
e
toS
and
Cre
ekR
d)
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)7
3 -8
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
yH
igh
way
Bri
dg
e
Pro
gra
m-
MA
P2
1
FV
ario
us
cou
nty
wid
e
bri
dge
reh
abil
itat
ion
,
rep
lace
men
tan
d
pre
ven
tati
ve
mai
nte
nan
ce
_
9/3
0/
and
01
/31
of
each
year
http
://w
ww
.do
t.ca
.go
v/hq
/Lo
calP
rogr
ams/
hbrr
99
/hb
rr9
9a.
ht
m
Pro
gra
mfo
rA
rter
ial
Sy
stem
Sy
nch
ron
izat
ion
(PA
SS
)fr
omM
TC
FY
13
/14
Cy
cle
S
__
5/1
7/2
01
3
Vam
siT
abju
la,
MT
CP
rogr
amM
anag
er(5
10
)8
17
-59
36
,
vtab
julu
@m
tc.c
a.go
v
Fit
zger
ald
Dr/
Ric
hm
on
dP
kwy
$1
9,1
45
4/1
0/2
01
2
P-T
AP
Rou
nd
14
RA
nti
och
$4
8,0
00
10
/15
/20
12
Cla
yto
n$
10
,84
8
Pin
ole
$1
2,5
04
Laf
ayet
te$
22
,19
8
Ori
nd
a$
8,0
00
San
Pab
lo$
11
,36
2
Bre
ntw
oo
d$
45
,60
0
El
Cer
rito
$1
6,3
44
Mar
tin
ez$
29
,04
0
Mo
raga
$1
2,7
20
Ric
hm
on
d$
48
,00
0
Co
nco
rd$
48
,00
0
Dan
vill
e$
37
,44
0
Oak
ley
$2
9,5
92
En
erg
yE
ffic
ien
cyan
dF
Co
nco
rd$
1,1
51
,90
01
2/1
4/2
00
9ht
tp:/
/ww
w.e
ecb
g.en
ergy
.go
v/gr
ante
es/d
efau
lt.h
tml
Con
serv
atio
nB
lock
Ric
hm
on
d$
95
5,1
00
Gra
nt
(EE
CB
G)
An
tio
ch$
88
5,0
00
form
ula
gra
nts
,U
SW
aln
ut
Cre
ek$
67
7,7
00
Dep
t.of
En
erg
yP
itts
bu
rg$
56
5,5
00
Oth
er
Sig
nal
Imp
rove
men
ts
Roa
dw
ayM
ain
ten
ance
Fo
rm
ore
info
,co
ntac
tA
my
Bur
chat
51
0-8
17
-57
35
or
abur
ch@
mtc
.ca.
gov
Rou
nd
13
Su
cces
sfu
lA
war
dee
s
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)8
3 -9
Pre
vio
us
Suce
ssfu
lAp
plic
atio
ns
Cat
egor
yF
un
din
gP
rog
ram
Fu
nd
Sou
rce*
Su
cess
ful
Aw
ard
ees
All
ocat
ion
Am
oun
t(s)
Ap
pli
cati
on
Dat
e(s)
Pro
gra
man
dC
onta
ctIn
fo
Air
Qu
alit
y(L
arg
eC
itie
s)B
ren
two
od
$1
97
,00
0
Dan
vill
e$
16
8,4
00
Co
ntr
aC
ost
aC
ou
nty
$3
,57
4,3
00
En
erg
yE
ffic
ien
cyan
d
Con
serv
atio
nB
lock
Gra
nt
(EE
CB
G)
form
ula
gra
nts
,U
S
Dep
tof
En
erg
y(S
mal
l
Cit
ies)
FL
afay
ette
$1
37
,00
0_
http
://w
ww
1.e
ere.
ener
gy.g
ov/
wip
/eec
bg.
htm
l
Ple
asan
tH
ill
$1
80
,93
4
En
viro
nm
enta
l
En
han
cem
ent
and
Mit
igat
ion
Pro
gra
m
FY
11
/12
SE
BR
PD
$3
50
,00
0_
Tir
e-D
eriv
edP
rod
uct
Gra
nt
(FY
20
12
/13
)
S_
_1
2/1
1/2
01
2ht
tp:/
/ww
w.c
alre
cycl
e.ca
.go
v/T
ires
/Gra
nts/
Pro
duc
t/F
Y2
01
21
3/d
efau
lt.h
tm
Reg
ion
alP
rior
ity
Con
serv
atio
nA
rea
Pro
gra
m
F_
_7
/19
/20
13
htt
p:/
/scc
.ca.
gov,
Am
yH
utz
el,
SC
C,
ahu
tzel
@sc
c.ca
.go
vo
r5
10
.28
6.4
18
0
*Fu
nd
Sou
rce
(F=F
ed
era
l,S=
Stat
e,R
=Re
gio
nal
,L=L
oca
l)9
3 -10
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTMeeting Date: October 17, 2013
Subject Project Monitoring: Upcoming Obligation Deadlines for Federal Aid
Projects, and Status of Projects Placed on FHWA Quarterly Inactive Lists
Summary of Issues Updated project funding and delivery information is included in the 2012STIP Summary Update. Projects that warrant priority monitoring and/orare at risk of losing funds are shaded grey (See Attachment A).
All Contra Costa projects that have STP/CMAQ funding through MTC’sNew Transportation Act Cycle 1 have been obligated with the exceptionof two of the City of Richmond’s projects. City staff is working diligentlywith Caltrans and FHWA to obligate funds (See Attachment B).
Staff is following up with project sponsors that are on the FHWA inactiveprojects list. (See Attachment C).
Recommendations Agencies are encouraged to expedite delivery and invoicing actions toprevent projects from losing funds.
FinancialImplications
Projects that are placed on the FHWA inactive list could lose allunexpended federal funds and could be required to return all reimbursedfederal funds.
Options N/A
Attachments A. Program Status Report (STIP)B. Program Status Report (STP/CMAQ/OBAG )C. Inactive Obligations – Local, State Administered/Locally Funded and
Rail Projects
Changes fromCommittee
4 -1
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Background
STIP funds are very limited and are subject to stringent “use it or lose it” requirements.
Unallocated STIP funds that lapse return to the County share balance in the next STIP cycle,
generally 4 to 5 years later than originally programmed. Inflationary effects erode the value of
these funds. The 2012 STIP projects are included in Attachment A.
The Cycle 1 STP/CMAQ projects were approved by MTC in September 2010 (See Attachment B).
All of Contra Costa’s projects have been obligated with the exception of two of the City of
Richmond’s projects. Due to Caltrans and FHWA audits, the City of Richmond has been going
through a more elaborate federal process which involves direct review of its Plans,
Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) by FHWA. City of Richmond staff has revised the project
plans in response to FHWA comments, and are working diligently with Caltrans and FHWA to
acquire final approvals to enable obligation of both projects.
Staff is following up with sponsors of projects that are on the FHWA inactive projects list.
Sponsors are following up with their Caltrans Local Assistance Engineers and submitting
progress/final invoices or justification letters to Caltrans (See Attachment C).
4 -2
Pro
gra
mS
tatu
sR
ep
ort
(ST
IP)
Re
port
Da
te:
10
/4/1
3
PP
NO
Pro
ject
Nam
eS
po
nso
rP
hase
Am
ou
nt
FY
All
ocati
on
Dead
lin
e
All
ocate
or
Aw
ard
Date
Req
uir
ed
Acti
vit
y
Sp
on
so
r
Dead
lin
e
Mo
nth
s
Rem
ain
ing
Co
mm
en
ts
RE
GIO
NA
LIM
PR
OV
EM
EN
TF
UN
DS
(RIP
)
2011F
Herc
ule
sR
ail
Sta
tion
Herc
ule
sC
ON
$8,0
00
10/1
16/3
0/1
26/2
8/1
2
CO
Nco
ntr
act
aw
ard
9/3
0/1
30
Aco
ntr
act
aw
ard
ext
ensi
on
request
to09/3
0/1
3
was
appro
ved
by
the
CT
C;
Fund
transf
er
agre
em
ent
was
exe
cute
dw
ithC
altr
ans
Div
Rail
(9/2
7/1
3)
298E
I-680/S
R4
Inte
rchange
-P
hase
1C
CT
AP
SE
$1,3
10
14/1
56/3
0/1
5P
SE
Allo
catio
n5/1
/15
19
274F
I-680
Auxi
liary
Lane,
Segm
ent
2C
CT
AC
ON
$19,4
50
12/1
36/1
1/1
312/2
4/1
2C
ON
Com
ple
tion
12/3
1/1
527
2025G
Inte
rmodalT
ransi
tC
ente
r,S
tatio
nB
uild
ing
Herc
ule
sC
ON
$5,1
00
16/1
76/3
0/1
7C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/17
44
2010B
Waln
ut
Cre
ek
BA
RT
TO
DIn
term
odal
BA
RT
CO
N$5,3
00
15/1
66/3
0/1
6C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/16
31
242J
I-80/S
an
Pablo
Dam
Rd.
Inte
rchange
Reconst
ruction
CC
TA
RO
W$7,0
00
14/1
56/3
0/1
5R
OW
Allo
catio
n5/1
/15
19
242J
I-80/S
an
Pablo
Dam
Rd.
Inte
rchange
Reconst
ruction
CC
TA
CO
N$8,0
00
15/1
66/3
0/1
6C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/16
31
222E
I-680
SB
HO
VG
ap
Clo
sure
,N
.M
ain
St
toLiv
orn
a
Rd
CC
TA
PS
E$5,5
57
15/1
66/3
0/1
6P
SE
Allo
catio
n5/1
/16
31
2010A
East
Contr
aC
ost
aB
AR
TE
xtensio
n(e
BA
RT
)B
AR
TC
ON
$13,0
00
15/1
66/3
0/1
6C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/16
31
TR
AN
SP
OR
TA
TIO
NE
NH
AN
CE
ME
NT
FU
ND
S
(TE
)
2011F
Herc
ule
sR
ail
Sta
tion
(CT
Dis
tric
t75)
Herc
ule
sC
ON
$1,0
97
10/1
16/3
0/1
26/2
8/1
2
CO
Nco
ntr
act
aw
ard
9/3
0/1
30
Aco
ntr
act
was
exe
cute
don
July
29,
2013
2025F
Moeser
Ln
&A
shbury
Ave
Ped/B
ike
Impro
vem
ents
ElC
err
ito
CO
N$977
10/1
16/3
0/1
22/5
/13
CO
NC
om
ple
tion
2/2
8/1
629
2119A
Concord
Monum
ent
Corr
idor
Ped/B
ike
Impro
vem
ents
Conco
rdC
ON
$944
11/1
26/1
1/1
33/5
/13
CO
Nco
ntr
act
aw
ard
9/5
/13
-1
Contr
act
was
aw
ard
ed
on
9/3
/13
2025E
SF
Bay
Tra
ilG
ap
Clo
sure
EB
RP
D/
Herc
ule
sC
ON
$862
11/1
26/3
0/1
26/2
8/1
2
CO
Nco
ntr
act
aw
ard
9/3
0/1
30
Aco
ntr
act
was
exe
cute
don
July
29,
2013
2118F
MT
CT
ER
ese
rve
MT
CC
ON
$1,1
92
13/1
46/3
0/1
4C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/14
7
CO
N$1,1
92
14/1
56/3
0/1
5C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/15
19
2118B
County
wid
eT
Ere
serv
eC
CT
AC
ON
$1,4
86
16/1
76/3
0/1
7C
ON
Allo
catio
n5/1
/17
44
Acti
on
Pla
n/S
tatu
sS
TIP
Pro
gra
mm
ing
4 -3
Pro
gra
mS
tatu
sR
ep
ort
(ST
IP)
Fu
nd
ing
At
Ris
k
Pro
jects
inth
iscate
go
ryare
at
risk
of
losin
g
fun
din
g
All
pro
ject
sw
ithin
2m
onth
sof
sponso
rdeadlin
e.
Subm
itallo
catio
nre
quest
or
request
time
ext
ensi
on
All
pro
ject
sw
ithin
2m
onth
sof
sponso
rdeadlin
e.
Aw
ard
contr
act
or
request
time
ext
ensi
on
thro
ugh
CT
C
Const
ruct
ion
shall
be
com
ple
ted
with
in36
month
sof
contr
act
aw
ard
2m
onth
sprior
topro
ject
com
ple
tion
deadlin
e.
Acc
ept
contr
act
or
subm
itext
ensi
on
request
2m
onth
sprior
todeadlin
e.
Exp
end
all
funds
or
request
ext
ensi
on
Pri
ori
tyM
on
ito
rin
gP
eri
od
Upon
FY
close
(June
30),
monito
rand
confir
m
that
sponso
rhas
subm
itted
finali
nvoic
ew
ithin
180
days
Fin
alI
nvoic
e/P
roje
ctC
om
ple
tion
(CO
NP
hase
)
Acc
ept
Constr
uct
ion
Contr
act
For
EN
V,
PS
Eand
RO
Wfu
nds,
funds
must
be
exp
ended
in
confo
rmance
with
the
appro
ved
pro
ject
exp
enditu
repla
nor
by
the
end
of
the
seco
nd
FY
follo
win
gth
eF
Yin
whic
hth
efu
nds
were
allo
cate
d
Fu
nd
ing
Ru
les
an
dM
on
ito
rin
gC
rite
ria
All
pro
ject
sw
ithin
8m
onth
sof
sponso
r
deadlin
e,
or
those
that
have
rece
ived
aone-
time
only
ext
ensi
on.
Sponso
rw
illta
ke
nece
ssary
act
ion
tom
eet
deadlin
e
All
pro
ject
sw
ithco
nst
ruct
ion
funds
allo
cate
d,
or
those
that
have
rece
ived
aone-t
ime
ext
ensi
on.
Follo
win
gconstr
uction
allo
catio
n,
sponso
rw
illaw
ard
const
ruct
ion
contr
act
with
in6
month
s
6m
onth
sprior
topro
ject
com
ple
tion
deadlin
e
dete
rmin
eif
ext
ensi
on
isre
quired
6m
onth
sprior
todeadlin
edete
rmin
eif
phase
of
work
can
be
com
ple
ted
or
ifan
ext
ensi
on
is
required
Req
uir
ed
Acti
vit
yF
un
din
gP
rovis
ion
s
Fin
ali
nvoic
em
ust
be
subm
itted
with
in180
days
aft
er
end
of
FY
(June
30)
inw
hic
hth
efin
ale
xpenditu
reocc
urr
ed.
For
CO
Nfu
nds,
finali
nvoic
em
ust
be
subm
itted
with
in180
days
of
contr
act
acce
pta
nce
Upon
contr
act
acc
epta
nce
,m
onito
rand
confir
m
that
sponso
rhas
subm
itted
finali
nvoic
ew
ithin
180
days
Pro
jects
inth
iscate
go
ryh
ave
ap
en
din
g
ST
IPd
ead
lin
ean
dre
qu
ire
sp
ecia
l
mo
nit
ori
ng
an
dacti
on
pla
ns
Allo
cate
Funds
Thro
ugh
CT
C-
All
phases
(EN
V,
PS
E,
RO
W,
CO
N)
Aw
ard
Const
ruct
ion
Contr
act
Com
ple
teE
xpenditu
res
Subm
itF
inalI
nvoic
e(E
NV
,P
SE
,R
OW
)
For
all
phase
s,
allo
cate
funds
by
June
30
of
FY
identif
ied
inS
TIP
.
Sponso
rdeadlin
eis
2m
onth
sprior
toC
TC
deadlin
e
4 -4
Pro
gra
mS
tatu
sR
ep
ort
(ST
P/C
MA
Q/O
BA
G)
10/0
4/1
3
Pro
ject
IDP
roje
ct
Nam
eS
po
nso
rP
hase
Am
ou
nt
(000's
)
Ap
pro
val
Date
of
Pro
ject
inth
e
TIP
Ob
lig
ati
on
Req
uest
Dead
lin
e
Fie
ld
Revie
w
NE
PA
Ap
pro
val
RO
WC
ert
Ob
lig
ati
on
Date
(A)
Co
mm
en
ts
ST
PL-5
038(0
22)
Hill
cre
st,
Putn
am
and
Contr
aLom
a
Pavem
ent
Rehab.
Antio
chC
ON
$1,9
07
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
1C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te04/0
4/1
1
ST
PL-5
135(0
41)
Conco
rdB
lvd
Pavem
ent
Rehab.
6th
to
Gla
zier
Conco
rdC
ON
$2,1
47
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
1C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te06/1
4/1
1
ST
PL-5
928(1
06)
County
wid
eA
rterialM
icro
Surf
ace
Pro
ject
CC
County
CO
N$2,1
21
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
1C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te06/0
6/1
1
ST
PL-5
127(0
26)
Railr
oad
Avenue
Pavem
ent
Rehab.
Pitt
sburg
CO
N$848
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
1C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te05/1
6/1
1
ST
PL-5
225(0
24)
Rehab.
Various
Art
erials
and
Colle
cto
rsW
aln
ut
Cre
ek
CO
N$1,8
56
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
1C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te04/2
6/1
2
ST
PL-5
300(0
09)
2011
PM
PO
verlay
Pro
ject
Bre
ntw
ood
CO
N$823
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te05/0
4/1
2
ST
PL-5
437(0
24)
Alc
osta
Blv
d.
Pavem
ent
Rehab.
San
Ram
on
CO
N$825
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te05/0
4/1
2
CM
L-5
239(0
20)
Centr
alA
ve
&Lib
ert
yS
tS
treets
cape
Impro
vem
ents
ElC
err
ito
CO
N$816
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te05/2
2/1
2
CM
L-5
404(0
23)
Dow
nto
wn
Ped,
Bic
ycle
&S
treets
cape
Impro
vem
ents
Lafa
yett
eC
ON
$1,6
90
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te10/2
8/1
1
CM
L-5
137(0
43)
Nevin
Ave.
Impro
vem
ents
(Bart
to19th
St.
)R
ichm
ond
CO
N$1,2
17
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
3C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te
Pla
ns
have
been
appro
ved
by
FH
WA
,and
are
under
revie
wby
Caltr
ans
HQ
.C
itysu
bm
itted
NE
PA
revalid
atio
nw
eek
of
July
29
CM
L-5
135(0
40)
Monum
ent
Corr
idor
Share
dU
se
Tra
il
Pro
ject
Concord
CO
N$666
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te04/2
6/1
2
CM
L-5
127(0
27)
N.
Park
sid
eD
r.B
icyc
le/P
ed
Impro
vem
ents
Pitt
sburg
CO
N$900
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te05/1
5/1
2
CM
L-5
137(0
44)
Barr
ett
Avenue
Bic
ycle
Lanes
Ric
hm
ond
CO
N$600
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te09/1
9/1
2
CM
L-5
137(0
39)
Nevin
Avenue
Impro
vem
ents
(19th
to27th
St.
)
Ric
hm
ond
CO
N$2,6
54
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
3C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teR
evis
ed
RO
Wce
rt.
and
NE
PA
re-v
alid
atio
n
appro
ved.
Pla
ns
re-s
ubm
itted
toF
HW
Ath
e
week
of
July
29
CM
L-6
364(0
10)
Clim
ate
Initi
ativ
eP
rogra
m,
"Inte
llidrive"
Sonom
a,
Marin,
Contr
aP
E$1,2
00
12/1
4/1
002/0
1/1
2C
om
ple
teC
om
ple
teC
om
ple
te02/2
2/1
1
Pro
ject
Deli
very
Mil
esto
nes
Esti
mate
d(E
)o
r
Actu
al
(A)
Date
sS
TP
/CM
AQ
Pro
gra
mm
ing
Report
Date
4 -5
Pro
gra
mS
tatu
sR
ep
ort
(ST
P/C
MA
Q/O
BA
G)
Pro
ject
sin
this
cate
gory
are
beyo
nd
the
Febru
ary
1oblig
atio
nre
quest
deadlin
eand/o
rhave
not
been
oblig
ate
d
Pro
ject
sin
this
cate
gory
have
not
com
ple
ted
a
field
revie
ww
ithin
the
required
timefr
am
e
Subm
itO
blig
atio
nR
equest
-A
llphase
s(P
E,
RO
W,
CO
N)
Pro
ject
sin
this
cate
gory
are
with
inth
ree
month
sof
the
oblig
atio
nre
quest
deadlin
e
Com
ple
tesu
bm
ittalt
oC
altr
ans
Loca
lAss
ista
nce
by
Febru
ary
1of
year
pro
gra
mm
ed
inT
IP
Request
Fie
ldR
evie
w
Imple
mentin
gagenci
es
are
required
tore
quest
afie
ldre
vie
ww
ithin
12
month
sof
appro
valo
fth
epro
ject
inth
eT
IP,
but
no
less
than
12
month
sprior
toth
eoblig
atio
ndeadlin
eof
const
ruct
ion
funds.
Pro
ject
sin
this
cate
gory
have
thre
em
onth
s
rem
ain
ing
inth
eT
IPpro
gra
mm
ing
FY
.S
ubm
itfie
ld
revie
wre
quest
Fu
nd
ing
At
Ris
k
Fu
nd
ing
Ru
les
an
dM
on
ito
rin
gC
rite
ria
Req
uir
ed
Acti
vit
yF
un
din
gP
rovis
ion
sP
rio
rity
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Req
uir
ed
4 -6
Inac
tive
Ob
ligat
ion
s
Loca
l,St
ate
Ad
min
iste
red
/Lo
cally
Fun
ded
and
Rai
lPro
ject
sU
pd
ate
do
n
09
/27
/20
13
Pro
ject
No
(new
ly
add
ed
pro
ject
s
hig
hlig
hte
d
inG
REE
N)
Day
su
nti
l
Inac
tive
FMIS
tran
sact
ion
or
deo
blig
atio
n
by:
Age
ncy
/Dis
tric
tA
ctio
nR
equ
ired
Age
ncy
Des
crip
tio
nFe
der
alFu
nd
sU
nex
pen
ded
Bal
50
38
01
1In
acti
ve1
0/1
/13
Rec
ord
sin
dic
ated
pro
ject
isin
Fin
al
Vo
uch
er.
Dis
tric
tto
veri
fy.
An
tio
ch
SR4
-B
AIL
EYTO
SR4
/16
0I/
C&
AD
J.
AR
TER
IALS
,SR
4C
OR
RID
OR
SIG
NA
L
INTE
RC
ON
NEC
T$
1,1
00
,00
0$
52
,32
5
51
37
04
4In
acti
ve1
0/1
/13
Sub
mit
invo
ice
by
8/2
0/2
01
3.
Invo
ice
pas
td
ue.
Co
nta
ctD
LAE.
Ric
hm
on
d
BA
RR
ETT
AV
E:G
AR
RA
RD
BLV
D-
SAN
PA
BLO
AV
E,B
IKE
LAN
E$
47
9,9
33
$4
79
,93
3
60
00
04
61
21
0/9
/13
Sub
mit
invo
ice
by
9/9
/20
13
.
Invo
ice
pas
td
ue.
Co
nta
ctD
LAE.
San
Fran
cisc
o
Bay
Are
aR
apid
Tran
sit
Dis
tric
t
BA
RT
RIC
HM
ON
DLI
NE
STA
TIO
NS,
SEIS
MIC
RET
RO
FIT
$4
,11
7,2
47
$2
,60
6,8
13
59
28
02
41
91
0/1
6/1
3
Rec
ord
sin
dic
ated
pro
ject
isin
Fin
al
Vo
uch
er.
Dis
tric
tto
veri
fy.
Co
ntr
aC
ost
a
Co
.
BET
HEL
ISLA
ND
RO
AD
AT
DU
TCH
SLO
UG
H,B
RID
GE
REP
LAC
EMEN
T/
BR
.NO
.28
C$
22
,14
6,3
94
$6
99
,09
3
60
75
01
72
11
0/1
8/1
3
Invo
ice
un
der
revi
ewb
yC
altr
ans.
Mo
nit
or
for
pro
gres
s.EB
RP
D
AT
CA
RQ
UIN
EZSC
ENIC
DR
.BET
WEE
N
MA
RIT
NEZ
AN
DP
OR
TC
OST
A,
CO
NST
RU
CT
CLA
SSIB
ICYC
LEA
ND
PED
ESTR
IAN
TRA
IL$
4,5
85
,76
6$
4,0
85
,76
6
51
27
02
66
71
2/3
/13
Invo
ice
un
der
revi
ewb
yC
altr
ans.
Mo
nit
or
for
pro
gres
s.P
itts
bu
rg
RA
ILR
OA
DA
VEN
UE
FRO
MLI
NSC
HEI
D
DR
IVE
TOSO
UTH
ERN
CIT
YLI
MIT
S,
RO
AD
WA
YR
EHA
BIL
ITA
TIO
N$
84
8,0
00
$6
08
,30
6
54
44
00
67
01
2/6
/13
Invo
ice
retu
rned
toag
ency
.
Res
ub
mit
toD
istr
ict
THIR
TYd
ays
pri
or
tod
ate
on
the
left
.O
rin
da
MA
NZA
NIT
AD
RIV
EB
RID
GE,
BR
IDG
EN
O.
28
C-0
38
6,B
RID
GE
REP
LAC
EMEN
T$
2,3
10
,20
7$
1,9
72
,76
6
59
28
08
97
51
2/1
1/1
3
Fin
alin
voic
eu
nd
erre
view
by
Cal
tran
s.M
on
ito
rfo
rp
rogr
ess.
Co
ntr
aC
ost
a
Co
.
DEE
RV
ALL
EYR
D,1
/4TO
1/2
MIS
.OF
CH
AD
BO
UR
E,R
EALI
GN
AN
DW
IDEN
RO
AD
WA
Y$
82
3,4
99
$2
27
,61
2
Pag
e1
of
2
4 -7
Inac
tive
Ob
ligat
ion
s
Loca
l,St
ate
Ad
min
iste
red
/Lo
cally
Fun
ded
and
Rai
lPro
ject
sU
pd
ate
do
n
09
/27
/20
13
Pro
ject
No
(new
ly
add
ed
pro
ject
s
hig
hlig
hte
d
inG
REE
N)
Day
su
nti
l
Inac
tive
FMIS
tran
sact
ion
or
deo
blig
atio
n
by:
Age
ncy
/Dis
tric
tA
ctio
nR
equ
ired
Age
ncy
Des
crip
tio
nFe
der
alFu
nd
sU
nex
pen
ded
Bal
59
28
08
57
51
2/1
1/1
3
Sub
mit
invo
ice
toD
istr
ict
THIR
TY
day
sp
rio
rto
dat
eo
nle
ft.
Co
ntr
aC
ost
a
Co
.
MA
RSH
CR
EEK
RD
-R
OU
ND
VA
LLEY
PA
RK
TOLY
DIA
LAN
E,R
OA
DW
AY
WID
ENIN
GFO
RN
EWSH
OU
LDER
$9
00
,00
0$
65
7,4
65
60
72
01
47
81
2/1
4/1
3
Invo
ice
retu
rned
toag
ency
.
Res
ub
mit
toD
istr
ict
THIR
TYd
ays
pri
or
tod
ate
on
the
left
.C
CTA
SR-2
39
BET
WEE
NSR
4IN
BR
ENTW
OO
D
AN
DI-
20
5IN
TRA
CY,
PLA
NN
ING
STU
DY-
DET
ERM
INE
ALI
GN
MEN
T$
3,0
97
,60
0$
3,0
97
,60
0
51
37
04
11
04
1/9
/14
Invo
ice
un
der
revi
ewb
yC
altr
ans.
Mo
nit
or
for
pro
gres
s.R
ich
mo
nd
5LO
CA
TIO
NS:
CO
RO
NA
DO
,HIG
HLA
ND
,
NYS
TRO
M,W
ASH
ING
TON
AN
DW
ILSO
N
ELEM
.SC
HO
OLS
.,SA
FER
OU
TETO
SCH
OO
L$
74
1,0
00
$7
27
,98
5
53
75
01
91
32
2/6
/14
Sub
mit
invo
ice
toD
istr
ict
THIR
TY
day
sp
rio
rto
dat
eo
nle
ft.
Ple
asan
tH
ill
LISA
LAN
EN
OR
THSI
DE,
INST
ALL
NEW
SID
EWA
LK$
59
4,1
50
$3
5,2
29
53
03
00
31
40
2/1
4/1
4
Invo
ice
retu
rned
toag
ency
.
Res
ub
mit
toD
istr
ict
THIR
TYd
ays
pri
or
tod
ate
on
the
left
.Sa
nP
ablo
RU
MR
ILL
BLV
DO
VER
SAN
PA
BLO
CR
EEK
@B
RO
OK
SID
E,R
EPLA
CE
BR
IDG
EN
O.
28
C-0
32
5$
4,1
50
,16
8$
74
,09
9
54
04
02
41
40
2/1
4/1
4
Rec
ord
sin
dic
ated
pro
ject
isin
Fin
al
Vo
uch
er.
Dis
tric
tto
veri
fy.
Lafa
yett
e
PLE
ASA
NT
HIL
LR
OA
DFR
OM
CO
ND
ITTO
OLY
MP
ICB
LVD
,PED
/BIK
EW
ALK
WA
Y
IMP
RO
VEM
ENT
$1
,14
3,7
75
$2
25
,06
0
Pag
e2
of
2
4 -8
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTMeeting Date: October 17, 2013
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\05 - Brdltr - Update Model Land Use.docx
Subject Countywide Model Land Use Update to Projections 2013 (Plan Bay
Area)
Summary of Issues ABAG will soon be releasing the official land use forecasts based on the
recently adopted Regional Transportation Plan (“Plan Bay Area”) (PBA),
as Projections 2013. Staff proposes updating the Countywide Model
with the latest projection series for use in the Countywide
Transportation Plan EIR and ongoing planning efforts.
Recommendations Accept the report and provide comments on model update to
Projections 2013 land use.
Financial Implications N/A
Options Request additional information from staff
Attachments A. Comparison of Households and Jobs between P-2009, Current
Regional Plans, and draft P-2013
Changes from
Committee
Background
As the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for Contra Costa, the Authority is responsible for
maintaining a travel demand forecasting model that is consistent with the regional (MTC)
model and land use database, and land use forecasts. MTC adopted the current RTP on July 18,
2013, called “Plan Bay Area” (PBA). PBA is the first RTP updated under SB375, which required
the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), an integrated land use-
transportation component of the plan, and ABAG is in the process of finalizing that scenario
into its next land use projection series for adoption. This set of land use forecasts will be known
as Projections 2013 (P-2013), and is expected to be released within the next month.
5 -1
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTOctober 17, 2013
Page 2 of 4
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\05 - Brdltr - Update Model Land Use.docx
The Contra Costa Countywide Model was last updated as part of the 2010 Decennial Model
Update, completed in 2012. During that update, the model land use was updated from
Projections 2005 (P-2005) to the recently released Current Regional Plans (CRP). While
Projections 2009 (P-2009) was the latest adopted ABAG projection series at the onset of the
Decennial update, during the process, ABAG developed and released CRP, which was developed
with extensive input from local jurisdictions, and was also known as the SCS Base Case, or P-
2011, though it was never officially adopted, but was made available for use in models. CRP
dealt with the 2008 recession’s impact on the employment forecasts in the Bay Area by
reducing job forecasts, and also extended the horizon year from P-2009’s 2035 to 2040. P-2013
incorporates the comments received during the RTP/SCS process and has major shifts in
housing and employment growth to Priority Development Areas (PDAs). Additionally, P-2013
lowers most of the Contra Costa growth rates found in P-2009 and P-2011, moving that growth
to the Bay Area core cities (Oakland, San Jose, San Francisco).
The charts below show the changes in Contra Costa household and job growth through the last
three projection series.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
P-2009 CRP P-2013
Contra Costa Household Growthby Projection Series
2010 Growth 2010 to 2035/40
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
P-2009 CRP P-2013
Contra Costa Job Growthby Projection Series
2010 Growth 2010 to 2035
5 -2
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTOctober 17, 2013
Page 3 of 4
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\05 - Brdltr - Update Model Land Use.docx
The changes in land use forecasts over the projection series highlight the need to remain
current and consistent with the latest data. You may notice that the 2010 base has changed
between the projection series. The reason for this is that in P-2009 and CRP, the 2010 number
was based off of a forecast, while the 2010 number in P-2013 was corrected to reflect the 2010
US Census figures. The CRP jobs figure in 2010 shows a difference of nearly 31,000. This change
was made by ABAG to reflect the recession’s impact on employment in the region. The rate of
household and job growth is where the major inconsistencies can be found between the three
projection series. A comparison of the growth forecasts between 2010 and 2035 (P-2009) /
2040 (CRP and P-2013) for the cities and unincorporated county can be found in Attachment A.
Notable changes between projection series include the following:
Brentwood households: P-2009 forecast an increase of 5,920 households, while CRPincreased them by 7,282. P-2013 reduces the forecast growth to just 1,160 households,a 410% decrease from P-2009 and a 528% decrease from CRP;
San Ramon households: P-2009 forecast an increase of 9,010, while CRP increased thenumber to 14,219 new households. P-2013 reduces the forecast growth to 5,440households, a decrease of 66% from P-2009 forecasts and a 161% decrease from CRP.
Antioch jobs: P-2009 forecast an increase of 18,530 jobs through 2035, while CRPincreased the number of new jobs by 21,822 by 2040. P-2013 reduces the forecastgrowth to just 6,420 new jobs by 2040, a decrease of 189% of the growth projected in P-2009, and a decrease of 240% from CRP
Richmond jobs: P-2009 forecast 29,070 new jobs between 2010 and 2035, while CRPincreased the number of jobs by 22,765 through 2040. P-2013 forecasts only 11,510new jobs by 2040, a 50% decrease from CRP and a 65% decrease from P-2009.
Authority staff will use the local review process to help the local jurisdictions make necessary
adjustments to their TAZ-basedland use allocations.
Next Steps
Once P-2013 is adopted and released by ABAG, the Authority can begin moving forward on the
land use update. Consultant resources are available using the existing contracts with Economic
& Planning Systems (EPS) for assisting with the disaggregation of land use data from ABAG’s
census tract-level data to CCTA’s Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) –level, and with Kittelson (formerly
5 -3
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORTOctober 17, 2013
Page 4 of 4
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\05 - Brdltr - Update Model Land Use.docx
Dowling) Associates, to incorporate P-2013 into the model and provide validation runs to
document the changes produced by the changes in land use. The effort would also include an
extensive review of land use at the TAZ-level by the local jurisdictions and County planning
staffs. The update effort would be managed by Authority staff, and would work through the
Technical Modeling Working Group (TMWG) to address any issues that may arise. Staff expects
the review and update process to take approximately six to eight months, upon release of
P-2013.
Any questions or concerns about the land use update should be transmitted to Matt Kelly at
(925) 256-4730 or [email protected].
5 -4
Contra Costa Jurisdictions
Growth in Households and Jobs from 2010 to 2035 (P-2009) and 2040 (CRP & P-2013)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Antioch Households Antioch Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Brentwood
Households
Brentwood Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
100
200
300
400
500
Clayton Households Clayton Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Concord Households Concord Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Danville Households Danville Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
El Cerrito Households El Cerrito Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
5 -5
Contra Costa Jurisdictions
Growth in Households and Jobs from 2010 to 2035 (P-2009) and 2040 (CRP & P-2013)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Hercules Households Hercules Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Lafayette Households Lafayette Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Martinez Households Martinez Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Moraga Households Moraga Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Oakley Households Oakley Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Orinda Households Orinda Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
5 -6
Contra Costa Jurisdictions
Growth in Households and Jobs from 2010 to 2035 (P-2009) and 2040 (CRP & P-2013)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Pinole Households Pinole Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Pittsburg Households Pittsburg Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Pleasant Hill
Households
Pleasant Hill Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Richmond
Households
Richmond Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
San Pablo Households San Pablo Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
San Ramon
Households
San Ramon Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
5 -7
Contra Costa Jurisdictions
Growth in Households and Jobs from 2010 to 2035 (P-2009) and 2040 (CRP & P-2013)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
Walnut Creek
Households
Walnut Creek Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
County
Unincorporated
Households
County
Unincorporated Jobs
P-2009 Growth CRP Growth P-2013 Growth
5 -8
Juri
sdic
tio
n2
01
02
03
5
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
35
% C
ha
ng
e2
01
02
04
0
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
40
% C
ha
ng
e2
01
02
04
0
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
40
% C
ha
ng
e
An
tio
ch3
4,7
70
39
,46
04
,69
01
3%
32
,66
84
2,6
11
9,9
43
30
%3
2,2
50
38
,78
06
,53
02
0%
Bre
ntw
oo
d1
9,0
30
24
,95
05
,92
03
1%
18
,25
02
5,5
32
7,2
82
40
%1
6,4
90
17
,66
01
,16
07
%
Cla
yto
n4
,02
04
,15
01
30
3%
3,9
66
4,1
19
15
34
%4
,01
04
,12
01
10
3%
Co
nco
rd4
6,8
60
56
,22
09
,36
02
0%
46
,29
66
5,1
24
18
,82
84
1%
44
,28
06
3,1
60
18
,88
04
3%
Da
nv
ille
15
,62
01
8,1
20
2,5
00
16
%1
6,5
74
18
,20
21
,62
81
0%
15
,42
01
6,9
10
1,4
90
10
%
El
Ce
rrit
o1
0,4
20
11
,54
01
,12
01
1%
10
,42
21
1,7
70
1,3
48
13
%1
0,1
40
11
,55
01
,41
01
4%
He
rcu
les
8,3
60
11
,76
03
,40
04
1%
8,3
61
12
,51
54
,15
45
0%
8,1
20
12
,68
04
,57
05
6%
Lafa
ye
tte
9,3
50
10
,39
01
,04
01
1%
9,5
89
10
,74
21
,15
31
2%
9,2
20
10
,64
01
,42
01
5%
Ma
rtin
ez
14
,77
01
6,5
60
1,7
90
12
%1
4,7
69
15
,10
23
33
2%
14
,29
01
5,6
90
1,4
00
10
%
Mo
rag
a5
,81
06
,69
08
80
15
%5
,81
16
,92
41
,11
31
9%
5,5
70
6,3
50
78
01
4%
Oa
kle
y1
0,7
20
13
,74
03
,02
02
8%
10
,83
51
5,9
90
5,1
55
48
%1
0,7
30
16
,45
05
,72
05
3%
Ori
nd
a6
,70
07
,50
08
00
12
%6
,86
87
,69
18
23
12
%6
,55
07
,45
09
00
14
%
Pin
ole
7,0
80
9,5
30
2,4
50
35
%7
,33
69
,62
12
,28
53
1%
6,7
80
7,9
70
1,2
00
18
%
Pit
tsb
urg
20
,99
03
0,8
60
9,8
70
47
%2
0,8
49
29
,99
69
,14
74
4%
19
,53
02
7,5
00
7,9
80
41
%
Ple
asa
nt
Hil
l1
4,7
70
18
,78
04
,01
02
7%
15
,24
71
6,6
52
1,4
05
9%
13
,71
01
5,0
60
1,3
50
10
%
Ric
hm
on
d3
6,9
40
50
,20
01
3,2
60
36
%3
7,8
97
52
,24
91
4,3
52
38
%3
6,0
90
47
,09
01
0,9
90
30
%
Sa
n P
ab
lo9
,68
01
1,2
30
1,5
50
16
%9
,97
51
1,6
95
1,7
20
17
%8
,76
01
1,0
30
2,2
70
26
%
Sa
n R
am
on
23
,66
03
2,6
70
9,0
10
38
%2
2,0
61
36
,28
01
4,2
19
64
%2
5,2
80
30
,72
05
,44
02
2%
Wa
lnu
t C
ree
k3
2,2
30
37
,75
05
,52
01
7%
33
,89
03
6,9
67
3,0
77
9%
30
,44
03
8,5
20
8,0
70
27
%
Co
ntr
a C
ost
a C
ou
nty
Un
inco
rpo
rate
d6
0,9
00
68
,38
07
,48
01
2%
61
,01
66
9,9
18
8,9
02
15
%5
7,7
10
63
,74
06
,03
01
0%
TO
TA
LS3
92
,68
04
80
,48
08
7,8
00
22
%3
92
,68
04
99
,70
01
07
,02
02
7%
37
5,3
70
46
3,0
70
87
,70
02
3%
Juri
sdic
tio
n2
01
02
03
5
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
35
% C
ha
ng
e2
01
02
04
0
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
40
% C
ha
ng
e2
01
02
04
0
Gro
wth
20
10
to
20
40
% C
ha
ng
e
An
tio
ch2
0,1
60
38
,69
01
8,5
30
92
%1
8,5
29
40
,35
22
1,8
22
11
8%
19
,07
02
5,4
90
6,4
20
34
%
Bre
ntw
oo
d6
,52
01
2,9
20
6,4
00
98
%6
,76
67
,62
48
59
13
%8
,65
01
1,2
80
2,6
20
30
%
Cla
yto
n1
,39
01
,81
04
20
30
%8
74
1,1
51
27
73
2%
1,5
40
1,9
40
40
02
6%
Co
nco
rd6
0,8
00
86
,26
02
5,4
60
42
%5
8,7
31
92
,72
83
3,9
96
58
%4
7,5
20
69
,31
02
1,7
90
46
%
Da
nv
ille
13
,86
01
6,0
40
2,1
80
16
%1
2,8
37
13
,40
55
68
4%
13
,44
01
7,6
00
4,1
60
31
%
El
Ce
rrit
o5
,72
08
,84
03
,12
05
5%
5,1
54
8,3
58
3,2
04
62
%5
,88
07
,31
01
,43
02
4%
He
rcu
les
2,7
90
5,6
10
2,8
20
10
1%
2,7
47
5,8
94
3,1
47
11
5%
3,8
80
6,4
00
2,5
20
65
%
Lafa
ye
tte
11
,32
01
1,9
40
62
05
%1
0,0
87
10
,93
18
43
8%
10
,64
01
3,2
30
2,5
90
24
%
Ma
rtin
ez
18
,51
03
0,1
10
11
,60
06
3%
16
,91
91
7,5
63
64
44
%1
8,3
00
22
,46
04
,16
02
3%
Mo
rag
a5
,03
06
,05
01
,02
02
0%
4,6
03
5,4
92
88
91
9%
4,7
40
5,9
30
1,1
90
25
%
Oa
kle
y2
,98
08
,19
05
,21
01
75
%2
,72
08
,21
75
,49
72
02
%3
,74
06
,67
02
,93
07
8%
Ori
nd
a6
,22
06
,95
07
30
12
%5
,68
96
,25
85
68
10
%5
,53
06
,98
01
,45
02
6%
Pin
ole
5,7
20
7,3
00
1,5
80
28
%5
,28
06
,49
51
,21
52
3%
6,7
40
8,4
80
1,7
40
26
%
Pit
tsb
urg
15
,37
03
4,2
00
18
,83
01
23
%1
2,4
32
26
,50
11
4,0
68
11
3%
14
,13
01
9,7
40
5,6
10
40
%
Ple
asa
nt
Hil
l1
7,0
90
26
,45
09
,36
05
5%
13
,81
51
9,4
28
5,6
13
41
%1
7,3
60
22
,92
05
,56
03
2%
Ric
hm
on
d4
0,6
60
69
,73
02
9,0
70
71
%3
7,0
77
59
,84
22
2,7
65
61
%3
0,6
70
42
,18
01
1,5
10
38
%
Sa
n P
ab
lo5
,90
08
,83
02
,93
05
0%
5,4
03
8,6
40
3,2
37
60
%7
,46
09
,65
02
,19
02
9%
Sa
n R
am
on
39
,73
05
2,0
70
12
,34
03
1%
36
,28
65
0,2
13
13
,92
73
8%
43
,88
05
8,2
40
14
,35
03
3%
Wa
lnu
t C
ree
k5
4,5
10
70
,18
01
5,6
70
29
%4
9,3
09
57
,07
67
,76
81
6%
41
,65
05
7,3
00
15
,65
03
8%
Co
ntr
a C
ost
a C
ou
nty
Un
inco
rpo
rate
d4
2,5
40
53
,48
01
0,9
40
26
%4
0,6
72
49
,42
48
,75
22
2%
40
,10
05
3,9
00
13
,80
03
4%
TO
TA
LS3
76
,82
05
55
,65
01
78
,83
04
7%
34
5,9
31
49
5,5
91
14
9,6
60
43
%3
44
,92
04
67
,01
01
22
,07
03
5%
JOBS
Cu
rre
nt
Re
gio
na
l P
lan
s (P
-20
11
)D
raft
P-2
01
3
Cu
rre
nt
Re
gio
na
l P
lan
s (P
-20
11
)D
raft
P-2
01
3
P-2
00
9
P-2
00
9HOUSEHOLDS
5 -9
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\06 - Brdltr SR 239 Study.docx
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: October 17, 2013
Subject Review of the SR 239 Draft Feasibility Study
Summary of Issues A draft Feasibility Study for the State Route (SR) 239 Corridorwas issued in mid-September for review and comment bystakeholders and interested parties throughout the studyarea, which spans three counties – Contra Costa, San Joaquin,and Alameda. The study was prepared by the ParsonsTransportation Group. Staff will provide an overview of thestudy.
Recommendations Accept the report, and comment as appropriate.
Financial Implications Approximately $14 million in funding is available for thisproject through federal earmarks obtained through the $241billion SAFETEA-LU (The 2005 Safe, Accountable, Flexible,Efficient – Transportation Equity Act (a Legacy for Users).
Options Request further information from staff
Attachments A. TriLink (SR 239) Feasibility Study Draft Report, ExecutiveSummary, September 2013 (Note: the full Draft FeasibilityStudy may be downloaded from www.trilink239.org)
B. Schedule of presentations to stakeholders and interestedparties
Changes fromCommittee
Background
The State Route (SR) 239 Project involves the development of a 20-mile multimodal
corridor connecting Brentwood and Tracy. Development of a corridor concept is
currently underway through a consultant agreement with Parsons Transportation Group
(PTG). The project is funded by a $14 million federal earmark obtained by Contra Costa
6 -1
Technical Coordinating Committee STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2013
Page 2 of 2
S:\06-TCC Packets\2013\10-17\06 - Brdltr SR 239 Study.docx
County in 2007. In January 2012, the contract with PTG to develop the feasibility study
and PSR/PDS was transferred from Contra Costa County to the Authority.
At present, PTG has completed a draft feasibility study that is currently being reviewed
by public agencies from three counties (Contra Costa, San Joaquin, and Alameda), as
well as by stakeholders that include representatives from business/developer, freight
transportation, and environmental interest groups. The Draft Feasibility Study initiates
the project development process by developing design considerations, looking at the
built environment and the environmental considerations that will need to be addressed,
then identifying corridor elements and evaluating the feasibility of different alignments
and configurations. The Executive Summary of the report is shown in Attachment A.
Attachment B shows the schedule for presentations to various organizations during
October 2013.
Authority staff will present the Draft Feasibility Study for review and discussion by the
TCC. Comments are due by October 31, 2013.
6 -2
TriL
ink
(SR
23
9)
Feas
ibili
ty S
tud
y
Co
nfi
rmed
Pre
sen
tati
on
Dat
es
Up
dat
ed: S
ept
30
20
13
Co
un
cil /
Bo
ard
Dat
eTi
me
Loca
tio
n
Air
po
rt A
dvi
sory
Co
mm
itte
e1
2-S
ep1
0:0
0 A
M5
00
Eag
le C
ou
rt, B
yro
n C
A
Trac
y C
ity
Co
un
cil
17
-Sep
7:0
0 P
M3
33
Civ
ic C
ente
r P
laza
, Tr
acy,
CA
95
37
6 -
- C
ou
nci
l Ch
amb
ers
at
Cit
y H
all
Co
ntr
a C
ost
a B
oar
d o
f Su
per
viso
rs1
-Oct
9:0
0 A
M6
51
Pin
e S
tree
t, R
oo
m 1
07
, Mar
tin
ez,
CA
94
55
3
CC
TA P
lan
nin
g C
om
mit
tee
2-O
ct6
:00
PM
CC
TA B
oar
d R
oo
m -
info
rmat
ion
al o
nly
Dis
cove
ry B
ay C
om
mu
nit
y Se
rvic
es D
istr
ict
Bo
ard
2-O
ct7
:00
PM
80
0 W
illo
w L
ake
Ro
ad, D
isco
very
Bay
, CA
94
50
5 -
- D
istr
ict
Off
ice
Ala
med
a C
ou
nty
BO
S
Pla
nn
ing
& T
ran
spo
rtat
ion
Co
mm
itte
e7
-Oct
9:3
0 A
M1
22
1 O
ak S
tree
t, O
akla
nd
, CA
94
61
2 -
- 5
th F
loo
r B
oar
d C
ham
be
rs
Tri-
Val
ley
Tran
spo
rtat
ion
Co
mm
issi
on
- T
AC
7-O
ct1
0:0
0 A
M4
82
5 G
leas
on
Dri
ve, D
ub
lin, C
A 9
45
68
Bre
ntw
oo
d C
ity
Co
un
cil
8-O
ct7
:00
PM
15
0 C
ity
Par
k W
ay, B
ren
two
od
, CA
94
51
3 -
- C
ou
nci
l Ch
amb
ers
Mo
un
tain
Ho
use
CSD
9-O
ct7
:00
PM
23
0 S
ou
th S
terl
ing
Dri
ve, M
ou
nta
in H
ou
se, C
A 9
53
91
--
Bo
ard
Ro
om
SJ V
alle
y R
egio
nal
Po
licy
Co
mm
itte
e1
0-O
ct3
:20
PM
Un
iver
sity
Pla
za W
ater
fro
nt
Ho
tel S
tock
ton
, 11
0 W
est
Frem
on
t St
ree
t St
ock
ton
, CA
95
20
2
TRA
NSP
LAN
10
-Oct
6:3
0 P
M8
01
Wilb
ur
Ave
nu
e, A
nti
och
, CA
94
50
9 -
- T
ri D
elta
Tra
nsi
t B
oar
d R
oo
m
CC
TA B
oar
d1
6-O
ct6
:00
PM
CC
TA B
oar
d R
oo
m
CC
TA T
ech
nic
al C
oo
rdin
atin
g C
om
mit
tee
17
-Oct
2:3
0 P
MC
CTA
Bo
ard
Ro
om
Tri-
Val
ley
Tran
spo
rtat
ion
Co
mm
issi
on
17
-Oct
4:0
0 P
MH
eri
tage
Ho
use
, Ala
med
a C
ou
nty
Fai
rgro
un
ds
45
01
Ple
asan
ton
Ave
nu
e, P
leas
anto
n, C
A 9
45
66
Byr
on
Mu
nic
ipal
Ad
viso
ry C
om
mit
tee
17
-Oct
6:0
0 P
M1
43
01
Byr
on
Hig
hw
ay, B
yro
n, C
A 9
45
14
-- E
xcel
sio
r M
idd
le S
cho
ol M
ult
ipu
rpo
se R
oo
m
Oak
ley
Cit
y C
ou
nci
l2
2-O
ct6
:30
PM
Oak
ley
Cit
y C
ou
nci
l Ch
amb
ers
32
31
Mai
n S
tree
t, O
akle
y
East
ern
Co
ntr
a C
ost
a Tr
ansi
t A
uth
ori
ty2
3-O
ct4
:00
PM
80
1 W
ilbu
r A
ven
ue
, An
tio
ch 9
45
09
San
Jo
aqu
in C
ou
nci
l of
Go
vern
men
ts2
4-O
ct5
:00
PM
55
5 E
ast
Web
er A
ven
ue
, Sto
ckto
n, C
A 9
52
02
ECC
Eco
no
mic
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Foru
m2
9-O
ct1
0:0
0 A
MB
yro
n J
et C
ente
r, 7
60
Osp
rey
Co
urt
, Byr
on
Air
po
rt
Pre
sen
tati
on
Dat
es
to b
e C
on
firm
ed
San
Jo
aqu
in C
ou
nty
BO
STu
es
9:0
0 A
M4
4 N
. San
Jo
aqu
in S
tree
t, S
tock
ton
, CA
95
20
2 -
- B
oar
d C
ham
be
rs, 6
th F
loo
r
Ala
med
a C
TC P
olic
y A
dvi
sory
Co
mm
itte
e1
4-O
ct1
0:3
0 A
M1
33
3 B
road
way
, Su
ite,
30
0, O
akla
nd
, CA
94
61
2
Ala
med
a C
TC2
4-O
ct2
:00
PM
13
33
Bro
adw
ay, S
uit
e, 3
00
, Oak
lan
d, C
A 9
46
12
6 -12