technical and economic feasibility studies
DESCRIPTION
Technical and economic feasibility studies. Methodology and useful tools. Table of contents. Methodology Methodology overview Offer analysis Strategic segment analysis Competitive position Business plan Useful tools. Table of contents. Methodology Methodology overview Offer analysis - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
January 2009
Technical and economic feasibility studies
Methodology and useful tools
Page 2© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 3© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 4© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
A technical and economic feasibility study aims at transforming an idea or an innovative technology into a structured project
► The way is long from an idea or a technology to a successful company► An entrepreneur faces diverse issues from market sizing to intellectual property and has to deal
with the different and numerous stakeholders of his industry
► The technical and economic study will help the entrepreneur to define his offer and his strategy
Competitors Venture Cap
Market prices Customers
Legal
environment
End-users
IP Ex-employerStart-up
Examples of constraints and stakeholders
Page 5© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Methodology overview
Offer analysisStrategic segment analysis
Competitive position
Business plan
► Qualify the needs for the different market segments
► Validate and structure the offer based on the idea or technology
► Define the targeted strategic segment
► Analyze the segment’s dynamics
► Analyze competitive structure and forces
► Define the key success factors on the segment
► Elaborate different scenarios : business model, offer, financing…
► Prioritize scenarios with specific criteria (return on assets, capacity of building a sustainable competitive advantage…)
► Elaborate global strategy and main milestones (R&D, marketing, recruiting…)
► Build financial forecasts (turnover, investments…)
► Calculate needed financing► Define targeted team
profile► Build IP strategy
► The methodology will progress through four stages which answer each to a main question for the client: ► Which offer based on our idea or technology will match an unmet need ?► Is the strategic segment I target attractive and what is required to success ?► Which model should we build to be successful on that segment ?► What are the next steps ?
Page 6© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 7© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The first goal to reach is to transform an innovative technology or an idea into a solution for an unmet need
► Séparer capacité de l’offre à répondre aux besoins et attentes des clients / utilisateurs finaux (parfois différents)
Page 8© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Page 9© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 10© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Strategic segment analysis is mandatory in order to build an appropriate value offer and the suitable business model
► The future enterprise will work on a specific value network, deal with specific competitors which want to sell a similar product to the same clients
► The first step is to define the pertinent strategic segment and its borders► The segment’s size and dynamics will be part of its attractiveness► In order to pick up the key success factors and to define a successful business model, the
structure of the segment must be analyzed► The analysis structure should then be the following:
Define the targeted strategic segment
Analyze the segment’s size and dynamics
Analyze the competitive structure and forces
Define the key success factors
Page 11© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Strategic segmentation is the basis of a pertinent further analysis
► Marketing segmentation is the process of dividing the market into homogeneous groups of customers, who respond similarly to a particular mix marketing of the four Ps –product, price, place, promotion
► Market segments must be distinguished from strategic segments which are those segments who require distinct value networks rather than just changes in the marketing mix
► For example in the airline industry flag carriers and low-cost companies are on two different strategic segments with their own value network, and a flag carrier could not be successful on low cost segment by keeping the same value network (cf. British Airways selling its subsidiary GO to EasyJet)
► Strategic segments regroup actors submitted to similar “forces” and who share the same key success factors
Source: Strategor, Chap. 2, From Market segments to strategic segments, Harvard BS Press
Identify a strategic segment Elements of identificationClients
Products
Clients
New entrants
Suppliers
Substitute products
Rivalry
Value network Economic model Competitive forces Key success factors Competitive
advantage sources
Page 12© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Segmentation is an iterative process which must lead to the appropriate level with an arborescence principle
► The appropriate level of segmentation is key:► Too detailed: confusion in the recommendations► Too rough: “economic journalism” risk
► Each sector has its “natural” segmentation criteria, eg. (production process x product) for industry► First stages are generally obvious but as the segmentation progresses it becomes more complex and
conceptual Example: LVMH activities
LVMH
Perfume
Wine and spirits
Leather and fashion
Retailing
Cognac and spirits
Champagne and wine
Champagne
Wine
Very premium
Premium
…
► The segmentation can be finally tested by placing the competitors on a matrix (eg. products/clients)
Page 13© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
How to proceed to study a segment’s dynamics ?
► Data may not always exist on the segment’s volume and value and the size must be assessed with a market sizing (eg. basically unit sales x price per unit)
► A particular attention must be paid to the completeness of demand growth drivers analysis
► Major shifts can (sometimes) be anticipated (eg. music industry) and consist in a threat or an opportunity for the start-up
Information sources
Information retrieval► Professional associations
and organizations data► Market studies concerning
the segment or the underlying drivers (eg. Datamonitor)
► Analysts reports on clients, competitors, industry (eg. Thomson Research)
► Business press (eg. Reinsurance Magazine)
Contacts to summon► Client► Competition interviews
(competitors, clients, suppliers, subcontractors…)
Market picture
Structure of the segment and breaks
Projected dynamics
Quantification of segment’s volume/value
Past growth on a long period
Segment’s structure
Breaks affecting competitors
Underlying demand growth drivers
Pricing growth drivers
Possible shifts
1
2
3
Page 14© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The maturity level of the strategic segment is a key point to define to understand the actors’ strategy and measure the attractiveness
Evolution of sales and profits of an activity
Sales
Profit
Time
Salesand profit
Start Growth Maturity Decline
►Growth rate
►Growth potential
►# of competitors
►Comp. structure
►Technology
►Activity access
Average
High
Low to high
Split and volatile
Stammering
Easy
Very high
High
High
Crystallization
Progressive
Possible
Low and stable
None
Low
Leaders stability
Frozen
Very difficult
None or negative
Negative
Low
Oligopoly
Frozen
Uninteresting
►Usual strategies Innovate or copy Invest in market shares Make beneficial Milk
Source: Strategor, Chap. 2
Page 15© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The useful dimensions of a strategic analysis can be summarized with Porter’s five forces
► The five forces diagram summarizes the useful dimensions for an activity and competition analysis:► Vertical relationships between suppliers and their clients, and the retailers or clients of those ones► External forces: other industries (innovation or substitutes) and governments and laws
Source: Strategic choices and competition, M.E. Porter, Strategor
Rivalry between existing firms
Suppliers
Regulation / governments
Clients
New entrants /Substitutes
A renovated approach of Porter’s five forces
What is the bargaining power of suppliers?Are there any entry barriers? Which ones?
Is there a risk of substitution products?
Is the activity threaten by regulation?
What is the bargaining power of clients?
Page 16© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The attractiveness of a strategic segment takes into account all the dimensions previously analyzed
► The intrinsic attractiveness of a segment must be corrected with the success capacity of the firm on this segment
CriteriaValue intensity
0 1 2 3
Projectable growth rate
Leaders market shares
Technologies stability
<2%
>60%
Continuous innovation
2% to 8%
30% to 60%
Cycle <5 years
>8%
<30%
Cycle >5 years
Risk of substitution products
Entry barriers
Prices level
High
Non significant
Price war
Medium
Medium
High elasticity
None
High
High freedom of action
Productivity gains margin
Value added source
Low
Ordinary
Medium
Based on know-how
High
Resulting from specific assets
Security of supplying
Seasonality
Basis for the development of other activities
Fragile
High
Difficult
Vulnerable
Medium
Possible
Secured
Low
Obvious
Each criterion can be rated from 0 to 3 in function of its value intensity
The sum of different ratings quantifies the intrinsic attractiveness of a segment
Valuation statement of a segment attractiveness
Source: Strategor, Chap. 4
Page 17© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The mastery level of the key success factors (KSF) defines the competitive position of the firm (1/3)
► Competitive position mixes external approach – the strategic segment – and internal approach –resources and skills of the firm – to diagnose the strategic position of the firm
The KSF must be few: 3 to 5 maximum
They must define the key elements which distinguish competitors and not those mastered by all
KSF are resources, skills, assets specific to an activity and mandatory for a firm to success
Their identification is based on an experimental approach where four sources must be analyzed:
Demand: growth drivers, clients types, bargaining powers…
Competition: entry barriers, concentration level…
Direct competitors: what distinguishes the best competitors?
Financial structure ratios: major costs, capital intensity…
Identify the KSF of the segment
1
Weight the different criteria
2 There are dominant KSF and the KSF must therefore be classified
An acceptable weighting won’t be exhaustive but reduced to 5 KSF
The result will be validated with objective data and confronted to operational management perception Source: Strategor, Chap. 4
Page 18© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The mastery level of the key success factors (KSF) defines the competitive position of the firm (2/3)
The performance of the firm and the main competitors must be evaluated
The evaluation must be simple (eg. 0 to 5) with an even number scale to avoid medium ratings
This stage implies to collect lots of data on the competitors to get objective information
Evaluate the mastery level
3
Evaluate globally
4
By multiplying the ratings and the weights and adding up all the ratings, a global evaluation is obtained
A visual display can be used to transcribe the results and identify the advantages and disadvantages
The strengths and weaknesses of the firm can be easily extracted
Source: Strategor, Chap. 4
Page 19© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
The mastery level of the key success factors (KSF) defines the competitive position of the firm (3/3)
Retailing implantation
Costs
TechnologyNetwork
Image
Leader
Us
Radar chart of competitive position (example) Competitive profile example
Forces 4 3 2 1 Weaknesses
Costs
Sales forces qualification
Territorial coverage
Product range
Production tool flexibility
Supply power
Financial power
Source: Strategor, Chap. 4
Page 20© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 21© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
► What ? What business model ?► Who gets the most value added from the offer ? Who is ready to pay ? How much ? ► Key success factors► Best practices
► With whom ? (team, collaborations…)► How much ? (financial projections, financing…)
► Customers acquisition plan► Costs projections
► Barriers to entry ?► Which barriers am I able to build to protect my business?
► Choose the best scenario: ROA, sustainable competitive advantage…
Page 22© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 23© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Page 24© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.
Table of contents
► Methodology► Methodology overview► Offer analysis► Strategic segment analysis► Competitive position► Business plan
► Useful tools
Page 25© 2009 Propriété d’Ernst & Young – Confidentiel.