teacher evaluation training may 3rd and 4th, 2012 gen admin meeting and ap meeting by glenn maleyko,...

19
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources A few of the slides are based on a presentation by Jim Gullen Oakland Schools at the MIEM conference in Lansing on February 29th, 2012. The video protocol is based on work by Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

Upload: shannon-wilkerson

Post on 13-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and

AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D

Director of Human Resources

May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and

AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D

Director of Human Resources

A few of the slides are based on a presentation by Jim Gullen Oakland Schools at the MIEM conference in Lansing on February 29th, 2012. The video protocol is based on work by Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP.Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

Page 2: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Legislation RequiresLegislation Requires Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems

Evaluations based on multiple rating categories

Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems

Evaluations based on multiple rating categories

Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

Page 3: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Evaluation ComponentsObservation ProtocolEvaluation ComponentsObservation Protocol

1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Page 4: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Evaluation ComponentsStudent Outcomes

Evaluation ComponentsStudent Outcomes

2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Page 5: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

0%10%20%30%

40%50%60%70%

80%

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

Observation

Growth Data

Page 6: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Observation Protocol has been the predominant

focus, however that will shift soon

Observation Protocol has been the predominant

focus, however that will shift soon

Currently calls for a significant portion based on student growth and assessment.

What does that mean?

Currently calls for a significant portion based on student growth and assessment.

What does that mean?

Page 7: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Winston ChurchillWinston Churchill

True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

Page 8: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Governor’s Council willGovernor’s Council will

Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a)

Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a)

Page 9: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)

(a)

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)

(a) That is value-added (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (I)

Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (IV)

It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) 380.1249(2)(a) (II)

That is value-added (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (I)

Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (IV)

It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) 380.1249(2)(a) (II)

Page 10: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Today we will focus on #1 with our training

Today we will focus on #1 with our training

The Governor’s Council Interim Report Came out. Not much direction at this point.

They will pilot models in 12 districts.

The Governor’s Council Interim Report Came out. Not much direction at this point.

They will pilot models in 12 districts.

Page 11: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Growth-Achievement Measurement OptionsGrowth-Achievement Measurement Options

1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess)

2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc)

3. Locally Created Assessments-common assessments ?- unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts,

other).

1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess)

2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc)

3. Locally Created Assessments-common assessments ?- unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts,

other).

Page 12: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Growth- Achievement Measures continued. Growth- Achievement Measures continued.

4. Measures other than Tests Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments.

5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures.

Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

4. Measures other than Tests Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments.

5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures.

Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

Page 13: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Danielson I-observation technique

Danielson I-observation technique

1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments

2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.

3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.

4. Environmental observations

1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments

2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior.

3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc.

4. Environmental observations

Page 14: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Evaluator Rater Reliability

Evaluator Rater Reliability

We will view one or two clips from teachers and then rate the lesson. A table and then a whole group discussion will follow.

We will vote using poll everywhere.com

We will view one or two clips from teachers and then rate the lesson. A table and then a whole group discussion will follow.

We will vote using poll everywhere.com

Page 15: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

A Quote from Maya Angelou

A Quote from Maya Angelou

“People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did.

But they will never forget how you made them feel”

Commencement Address, 2002

“People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did.

But they will never forget how you made them feel”

Commencement Address, 2002

Page 16: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Maria MontessoriMaria Montessori

One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

Page 17: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Superintendent’s comments

Superintendent’s comments Treat staff as you want to be treated

Would you want your children in this class

Share some positive comments Share opportunities to improve No surprises Have a real conversation Set the time – not rushed Do not just put in mailbox and ask them to review and sign

This is important – treat with respect

Treat staff as you want to be treated Would you want your children in this class

Share some positive comments Share opportunities to improve No surprises Have a real conversation Set the time – not rushed Do not just put in mailbox and ask them to review and sign

This is important – treat with respect

Page 18: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

Rate the LessonRate the Lesson Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot

Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective

Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot

Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective

Page 19: TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING May 3rd and 4th, 2012 GEN ADMIN MEETING and AP MEETING BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources May 3rd and 4th,

ObservationsObservations

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?