taxonomy development in an enterprise context tom reamy chief knowledge architect kaps group...

24
Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services http://www.kapsgroup.com

Upload: chase-mackay

Post on 26-Mar-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

Taxonomy Developmentin an Enterprise Context

Tom ReamyChief Knowledge Architect

KAPS Group

Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

http://www.kapsgroup.com

Page 2: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

2

Agenda

Introduction The Enterprise Context

– Making the Business Case– Beyond Search and Taxonomy Projects

Infrastructure Model of Taxonomy Development– Taxonomy in 4 Contexts

• Content, People, Processes, Technology

Infrastructure Solutions – the Elements Applying the Model – Practical Dimension

– Starting and Resources Conclusion

Page 3: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

3

KAPS Group

Knowledge Architecture Professional Services (KAPS) Consulting, strategy recommendations Knowledge architecture audits Partners – Convera, Inxight, and others Taxonomies: Enterprise, Marketing, Insurance, etc.

– Taxonomy customization Intellectual infrastructure for organizations

– Knowledge organization, technology, people and processes– Search, content management, portals, collaboration,

knowledge management, e-learning, etc.

Page 4: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

4

Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context Traditional Metrics

– Time Savings – 22 minutes per user per day = $1Mil a Year– Apply to your organization – customer service, content

creation, knowledge industry– Cost of not-finding = re-creating content

Research– Advantages of Browsing – Marti Hearst, Chen and Dumais– Nielsen – “Poor classification costs a 10,000 user

organization $10M each year – about $1,000 per employee.” Stories

– Pain points, success and failure – in your corporate language

Page 5: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

5

Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context Taxonomies are an Infrastructure Resource Right context – business case and development

– Not as a stand alone project Economist June 9, 2005:

– Overdue and over budget, over and over again.– Companies are increasingly keen on projects. – Why? When so many of them fail.

Failure to integrate all relevant contexts Under-developed understanding of contexts Closure is an illusion.

Page 6: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

6

Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context Justification

– Search Engine - $500K-$2Mil– Content Management - $500K-$2Mil– Portal - $500-$2Mil– Plus maintenance and employee costs

Taxonomy– Small comparative cost– Needed to get full value from all the above

ROI – asking the wrong question– What is ROI for having an HR department?– What is ROI for organizing your company?

Page 7: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

7

Business Case for Taxonomies:The Right Context – Resources Integrated Enterprise requires both an infrastructure team and

distributed expertise.– Software and SME’s is not the answer - keywords

Taxonomies not stand alone– Metadata, controlled vocabularies, synonyms, etc.– Variety of taxonomies, plus categorization, classification, etc.

• Important to know the differences, when to use which

Advanced Cognitive Differences– Panda, monkey, banana

Infrastructure as Operating System– Word vs. Word Perfect– Instead of sharing clipboard, share information and knowledge.

Page 8: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

8

Infrastructure Model of Taxonomy DevelopmentTaxonomy in Basic 4 Contexts Ideas – Content Structure

– Language and Mind of your organization– Applications - exchange meaning, not data

People – Company Structure– Communities, Users, Central Team

Activities – Business processes and procedures– Central team - establish standards, facilitate

Technology / Things– CMS, Search, portals, taxonomy tools– Applications – BI, CI, Text Mining

Page 9: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

9

Taxonomy in ContextStructuring Content All kinds of content and Content Structures

– Structured and unstructured, Internet and desktop

Metadata standards – Dublin core+– Keywords - poor performance – Need controlled vocabulary, taxonomies, semantic network

Other Metadata – Document Type

• Form, policy, how-to, etc.– Audience

• Role, function, expertise, information behaviors– Best bets metadata

Facets – entities and ideas– Wine.com

Page 10: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

10

Taxonomy in Context:Structuring People

Individual People– Tacit knowledge, information behaviors– Advanced personalization – category priority

• Sales – forms ---- New Account Form

• Accountant ---- New Accounts ---- Forms

Communities– Variety of types – map of formal and informal– Variety of subject matter – vaccines, research, scuba– Variety of communication channels and information behaviors– Community-specific vocabularies, need for inter-community

communication (Cortical organization model)

Page 11: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

11

Taxonomy in Context:Structuring Processes and Technology Technology: infrastructure and applications

– Enterprise platforms: from creation to retrieval to application– Taxonomy as the computer network

• Applications – integrated meaning, not just data

Creation – content management, innovation, communities of practice (CoPs)

– When, who, how, and how much structure to add– Workflow with meaning, distributed subject matter experts (SMEs)

and centralized teams

Retrieval – standalone and embedded in applications and business processes

– Portals, collaboration, text mining, business intelligence, CRM

Page 12: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

12

Taxonomy in Context: The Integrating Infrastructure Starting point: knowledge architecture audit, K-Map

– Social network analysis, information behaviors People – knowledge architecture team

– Infrastructure activities – taxonomies, analytics, best bets– Facilitation – knowledge transfer, partner with SMEs

“Taxonomies” of content, people, and activities– Dynamic Dimension – complexity not chaos– Analytics based on concepts, information behaviors

Taxonomy as part of a foundation, not a project– In an Infrastructure Context

Page 13: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

13

Infrastructure Solutions: The start and foundationKnowledge Architecture Audit Knowledge Map - Understand what you have, what you

are, what you want– The foundation of the foundation

Contextual interviews, content analysis, surveys, focus groups, ethnographic studies

Category modeling – “Intertwingledness” -learning new categories influenced by other, related categories

Natural level categories mapped to communities, activities• Novice prefer higher levels• Balance of informative and distinctiveness

Living, breathing, evolving foundation is the goal

Page 14: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

14

Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Roles and Functions Knowledge Architect and learning object designers Knowledge engineers and cognitive anthropologists Knowledge facilitators and trainers and librarians Part Time

– Librarians and information architects– Corporate communication editors and writers

Partners– IT, web developers, applications programmers– Business analysts and project managers

Page 15: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

15

Infrastructure Solutions: Resources People and Processes: Central Team

Central Team supported by software and offering services– Creating, acquiring, evaluating taxonomies, metadata standards,

vocabularies– Input into technology decisions and design – content management,

portals, search– Socializing the benefits of metadata, creating a content culture– Evaluating metadata quality, facilitating author metadata– Analyzing the results of using metadata, how communities are using– Research metadata theory, user centric metadata – Design content value structure – more nuanced than good / poor

content.

Page 16: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

16

Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Facilitating Knowledge Transfer Need for Facilitators

– Amazon hiring humans to refine recommendations– Google – humans answering queries

Facilitate projects, KM project teams– Facilitate knowledge capture in meetings, best practices

Answering online questions, facilitating online discussions, networking within a community

Design and run KM forums, education and innovation fairs Work with content experts to develop training, incorporate

intelligence into applications Support innovation, knowledge creation in communities

Page 17: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

17

Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesPeople and Processes: Location of Team

KM/KA Dept. – Cross Organizational, Interdisciplinary Balance of dedicated and virtual, partners

– Library, Training, IT, HR, Corporate Communication

Balance of central and distributed Industry variation

– Pharmaceutical – dedicated department, major place in the organization

– Insurance – Small central group with partners– Beans – a librarian and part time functions

Which design – knowledge architecture audit

Page 18: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

18

Infrastructure Solutions: ResourcesTechnology

Taxonomy Management – Text and Visualization

Entity and Fact Extraction Text Mining Search for professionals

– Different needs, different interfaces

Integration Platform technology– Enterprise Content Management

Page 19: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

19

Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentInitial Development / Customization

Combination of top down and bottom up (and Essences)– Top: Design an ontology, facet selection – Bottom: Vocabulary extraction – documents, search logs,

interview authors and users– Develop essential examples (Prototypes)

• Most Intuitive Level – genus (oak, maple, rabbit)

• Quintessential Chair – all the essential characteristics, no more

Map the taxonomy to communities and activities– Category differences– Vocabulary differences

Page 20: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

20

Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentEvaluate and Refine Formal Evaluation

– Quality of corpus – size, homogeneity, representative– Breadth of coverage – main ideas, outlier ideas (see next)– Structure – balance of depth and width

Practical Evaluation– Test in real life application– Test node labels with Subject Matter Experts, representative

users and documents– Test with representative key concepts– Test for un-representative strange little concepts that only

mean something to a few people but the people and ideas are key and are normally impossible to find

Page 21: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

21

Infrastructure Solutions: Taxonomy DevelopmentIssues and Ideas

Enterprise Taxonomy– No single subject matter taxonomy – Need an ontology of facets or domains

Standards and Customization– Balance of corporate communication and departmental specifics– At what level are differences represented?– Customize pre-defined taxonomy – additional structure, add

synonyms and acronyms and vocabulary

Enterprise Facet Model:– Actors, Events, Functions, Locations, Objects, Information

Resources– Combine and map to subject domains

Page 22: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

22

Conclusion

Taxonomy development is not just a project– It has no beginning and no end

Taxonomy development is not an end in itself– It enables the accomplishment of many ends

Taxonomy development is not just about search or browse– It is about language, cognition, and applied intelligence

Strategic Vision (articulated by K Map) is important – Even for your under the radar vocabulary project

Paying attention to theory is practical– So is adapting your language to business speak

Page 23: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

23

Conclusion

Taxonomies are part of your intellectual infrastructure– Roads, transportation systems not cars or types of cars

Taxonomies are part of creating smart organizations– Self aware, capable of learning and evolving

Think Big, Start Small, Scale Fast If we really are in a knowledge economy We need to pay attention to – Knowledge!

Page 24: Taxonomy Development in an Enterprise Context Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

Questions?

Tom [email protected]

KAPS Group

Knowledge Architecture Professional Services

http://www.kapsgroup.com