tamilselvi mba

8/10/2019 Tamilselvi MBA

1/24

1

CHAPTER- V

ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF NEYCER INDIA LIMITED:

The data, after collection, has to be processed and analyzed in

accordance with the outline laid down for the purpose at the time of

developing the research plan. This is essential for a scientific study for

ensuring that we have all relevant data for making contemplated

comparisons and analysis.

The term analysis refers to the consumption of certain measures

along with searching for patterns of relationship that exist among data

groups. Analysis of a data in a general way involves a number of closely

related operations, which are performed with the purpose of

summarizing the collected data and organizing these in a manner that

they answer the research question.

The following tools are used for analysis of data.

1. Percentage method

2. Anova

3. t- test and

4. Chi-Square


2/24

2

Table-4.1

Distribution of Respondents by their Age

AgeNo. of

RespondentsPercentage

Below 35 yrs 15 15.00

36-45 yrs 57 57.00

46-50 yrs 28 28.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

It is inferred that 15% of the respondents belong to the age group

of below 35 years , 57% of the respondents are under the age group of

36-45 years and 28% of the respondents belong to the age group of above

46 years. So majority of the respondents are 36-45 years age groups.


3/24

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Below 35 yrs 36-45 yrs 46-50 yrs

15

57

28

Percentage

Age

Distribution of Respondents by their Age

Below 35 yrs

36-45 yrs

46-50 yrs


4/24

4

Table-4.2

Distribution of the Respondents by their Gender

GenderNo. of


Male 78 78.00

Female 22 22.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

From the table it is inferred that 99% of the respondents have male

and the remaining 1% of the respondents have female. So majority of the

respondents are male respondents.

78

22

Distribution of the Respondents on the basis gender

Male

Female


5/24

5

Table-4.3

Distribution of the Respondents by their Qualification

QualificationNo. of


Below SSLC 25 25.00

H.Sc 60 60.00

Degree 9 9.00

Diploma 6 6.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

From the table it is inferred that 25% of the respondents are from

Below SSLC, 60% of the respondents are from H.Sc course, 9% of the

respondents are degree and the remaining 6% of the respondents are

diploma. So majority of the respondents are higher secondary level

qualification.


6/24

6

Chart-4.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Below SSLC H.Sc Degree Diploma

25

60

96

Percentage

Qualification

Distribution of Respondents by their Qualification

Below SSLC

H.Sc

Degree

Diploma


7/24

7

Table-4.4

Distribution of the Respondents by their Income

IncomeNo. of


Less than 5000 10 10.00

5001-10000 41 41.00

10001-20000 35 35.00

20000 above 14 14.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

From the table it is inferred that 10% of the respondents are from

Less than 5000 income, 41% of the respondents are from Rs.5001-

10000, 9% of the respondents are Rs.10001-20000 and the remaining

14% of the respondents are 20000 above. So majority of the respondents

are 5001-10000 income.


8/24

8

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Less than5000

5001-10000 10001-20000 20000 above

10

41

35

14Percentage

Income

Distribution of Respondents by their Income

Less than 5000

5001-10000

10001-20000

20000 above


9/24

9

Table-4.5

Distribution of the respondents on the basis of marital status

Marital StatusNo. of


Married 89 89.00

Unmarried 11 11.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

From the above table it is inferred that 89% of the respondents are

married group and 11% of the respondents unmarried groups. So

majority of the respondents are married groups.


10/24

10

Chart 4.4

89

11


Married

Unmarried


11/24

11

Table-4.6

Distribution of the respondents on the basis of Nature of Family

Setup

Nature of

family setup

No. of


Nuclear family 23 23.00

Joint family 77 77.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:


Nature of family setup group and 77% of the respondents unmarried

groups. So majority of the respondents are married groups.


12/24

12

23

77

Distribution of the respondents on the basis of Nature of family setup

Nuclear family

Joint family


13/24

13

Table-4.7

Distribution of the Respondents by their Experience

ExperienceNo. of


Less than 7 years 30 30.00

8 years above- 15 years 52 52.00

15 years above 18 18.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:

From the table it is inferred that 30% of the respondents are less

than 7years experience, 52% of the respondents are from 8 years above-

15 years and 18% of the respondents are 15 years above experience.


14/24


15/24

15

Table-4.8


Setup

Living thePlace

No. ofRespondents

Percentage

Village 62 62.00

Town 38 38.00

Total 100 100.00

Inference:


living the place and 38% of the respondentsare Town.

62

38


Village

Town


16/24

16

Table-4.1

Showing Mean, SD and ANOVA value for employee conflict on the

basis of Age

Age N Mean SD F- Value P- Value

Below 35 yrs 15 78.93 9.00

1.350 0.26 (NS)36-45 yrs 57 82.25 9.43

46-50 yrs 28 79.64 6.73

Total 100 81.02 8.72

Inference:

Hy: Employees do not differ in their opinion about employees conflict on

the basis of age.

The table shows that all the group of employees scored equal mean

values. The calculated F ratio (1.350) is not significant. So the stated

hypothesis is accepted. Therefore Employees do not differ in their opinion

about employees conflict on the basis of age.


17/24

17

Table-4.2

Showing Mean, SD and t- value for employee conflict on the basis of

gender

Gender N Mean SD t- Value P- Value

Male 99 81.05 8.760.346

0.730(NS)Female 1 78.00 0.00

Inference:


the basis of gender.


values. The calculated t ratio (0.346) is not significant. So the stated


about employees conflict on the basis of gender.


18/24

18

Table-4.3


basis of qualification

Qualification N Mean SD F- Value P- Value

Below SSLC 25 80.84 8.38

0.4310.731(NS)

H.Sc 60 81.53 9.21

Degree 9 80.56 8.78

Diploma 6 77.33 5.05

Total 100 81.02 8.72


the basis of Qualification.




about employees conflict on the basis of Qualification.


19/24

19

Table-4.4


basis of Income

Income N Mean SD F- Value P- Value

Less than 5000 10 80.30 9.20

0.423 0.7375001-10000 41 80.73 9.21

10001-20000 35 82.23 8.79

20000 above 14 79.36 7.08

Total 100 81.02 8.72


the basis of Qualification.




about employees conflict on the basis of Qualification.


20/24

20

Table-4.5


Marital Status N Mean SD t- Value P- Value

Married 89 81.16 8.73 0.446 0.670(NS)

Unmarried 11 79.91 8.98


the basis of Marital status.




about employees conflict on the basis of marital status.


21/24

21

Table-4.6


Setup

Nature of

Family SetupN Mean SD t- Value P- Value

Nuclear

family23 79.96 9.79

0.6120.508

(NS)Joint family 77 81.34 8.43


the basis of Family setup.




about employees conflict on the basis of family setup.


22/24

22

Table-4.7

Distribution of the Respondents by their Experience

Experience N Mean SD F- Value P- Value

Less than 7 years 30 80.37 9.01 1.59 0.209

8 years above- 15years

52 82.35 9.00

15 years above 18 78.28 6.91

Total 100 81.02 8.72


the basis of Experience.


values. The calculated F value (1.59) is not significant. So the stated


about employees conflict on the basis of experience.


23/24

23

Table-4.8


Setup

Living the

PlaceN Mean SD t- Value P- Value

Village 62 81.79 8.75 1.132 0.62 (NS)

Town 38 79.76 8.66


the basis of Family setup.


values. The calculated t Value (1.132) is not significant. So the stated


about employees conflict on the basis of family setup.


24/24

24

tamilselvi mba

Documents