tactical management of credit-quality weightings by bond funds
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
1/15
Tactical Management of
Credit-Quality Weightingsby Bond Funds
George Hoffmann
University at Albany
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
2/15
Objective of the Study
To determine if active bond portfolio management
outperforms passive management
o Active/Passive management: degree of credit quality weighting changes
2
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
3/15
Primary Hypothesis
A relation exists between active bond portfoliomanagement and performance.
H1: active portfolio management outperformspassive management.
o R(Active Bond Portfolios) > R(Passive Bond Portfolios).
o SD(Active Bond Portfolios) < SD(Passive Bond Portfolios).
3
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
4/15
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
5/15
Motivation for the Study (2) Carty and Fons (1993)
o Measuring Changes in Corporate Credit Quality Short-term ratings have a strong correlation with the business cycle.
Concept of ratings momentum.
Sterling and Fridson and Kong (2009)o Return Dynamics of Distressed Bonds
White (2010)o The Credit Rating Agencies
Role of credit ratings in portfolio management and likelihood of the lenderto pay back debt.
5
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
6/15
Data Source Source: PSN Database
Identify bond portfolios and the credit ratings ofholdings
Years: 1983-2011o Years of chosen sample: 1995-2011
Nature of data:o Credit rating weights and their changes by year
o Monthly performance: return and return net of benchmark
6
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
7/15
Characteristics of the Data
The role of credit rating assignments grew from2001 to 2011.
Displays impact of the credit rating agencies.
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
AAA 40 45 47 50 59 60 59 54 47 45 38AA 9 9 8 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 16
A 13 12 12 12 11 10 10 13 15 15 16
BBB 4 4 4 5 6 7 7 8 11 12 13
BB 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 5 5 5 6
B 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 6 6
Under B 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Unrated 33 27 25 20 7 4 3 3 3 3 3
7
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
8/15
14,975 original funds in PSNDatabase
2,906 with creditweighting data
1,856 for testperiod 1995-
2011
1,067testable
627 ActivelyManaged
Funds
440 PassivelyManaged
Funds
8
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
9/15
Determining Representative Passive
Fund
Method of determination:o Benchmark: Barclays Aggregate Bond Index
o Tracking fund: Hartford Passive Bond Index Fundvery similar portfolio
composition to the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index, and data availablefor 1995 to 2011
o Monthly average return 1995 to 2011 for Barclays Index: 0.554%
o Monthly average return 1995 to 2011 for Hartford Fund: 0.553%
9
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
10/15
Determining Active or Passive From original fundsfind credit rating weight deviation
between years
Compare to the benchmark by subtracting and taking theabsolute value
Average the percent deviations from the benchmark
Label high deviation as actively managed and low as
passively managed Use 5% average deviation as cut off level for active
AAA1995
AAA1996
20% 25%
Credit rating weight data Deviation between years
% Change AAA 1995 -1996
5%
10
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
11/15
11
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
12/15
12
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
13/15
Performance Results: Monthly
1995-2011
None of the strategies significantly outperformed. Benchmark adjusted return difference of means:
o t-stat: 0.070 Raw return difference of means:
o
t-stat: -0.377 Actively managed fund returns had notably lower
standard deviation. Active managers control return variability through tactical credit
quality weighting
13
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
14/15
Credit-quality Change vs. Performance
14
-
7/30/2019 Tactical Management of Credit-Quality Weightings by Bond Funds
15/15
Conclusion Fail to reject the null hypothesis
o H0: active portfolio management does not outperform passive
management.
Further Observations:
o Regression results: The more actively managed the portfolio, the lower isROR (to a point)
o Although their return is not superior, actively managed funds appear to
manage risk comparatively well.
15