systemic assessment workshop faculty of science menofia university prof.a.f.m.fahmy january 2010...

27
SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Upload: amber-watson

Post on 26-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT

Workshop Faculty of science

Menofia University

Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY

January 2010

PART-II

Page 2: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT

SYSTEMIC LEARNING

OUTCOMES

COGNATIVE

COGNATIVE

AFFECTIVEAFFECTIVE SKILLS SKILLS

Page 3: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Requirements for building Systemic Assessment

-Content analysis of the course unites into concepts, and their related knowledge,

skills, attitudes.

--Determination of the size of the building- systemics[ Trigonal- Quadrilateral- ……]

-Determinations of the types of relations

between the given concepts.

Page 4: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

V-Systemic Matching Questions

[SMQ, s]

-Measure the student's ability to find the

relationship between a set of similar items,

each of which has two components ,

and their relation ships, and arrange them

in a given systemic.

Page 5: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Disadvantage: -Do not allow instructors to measure

students' writing skills.

-Advantages: -Reduces the effects of guessing

- Highly reliable exam scores.

-Short reading and response time ,allowing more content

to be included in a given set of SMQ, s.

,

Page 6: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Guide lines for WritingSMQ,s.

1-The items in the left (Column A) areusually called

premises and assigned numbers( 1 ,2 ,3 ,etc.).

2-The items in the right (Column B) are

called responses and designated

by capital letters (A,B,C etc). .

-

,

Page 7: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

3-The arrangement of premises , and

responses are in a given systemic diagram

(Column C, in the middle)

4- All of the premises and responses for

a matching item should appear on

the same page with the given

systemic diagram.

,

Page 8: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Choose concepts from column (A) & Relations from

From column (B) to build the correct systemic

in column (C):

.

,

A

B

C

D

F

X

Y

Z

E

E

F

G

BCA

A

C

B

D

E

X

Y

Z

ILO: Synthesis

Page 9: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Example- )Chem(: Choose Compounds from column (A) & ReactionconditionsFrom column (B) to build the correct systemic

in column (C):

.

,

Page 10: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

VI-Systemic Sequencing Questions:[SSQ,s]

-SSQ,s require the student to position

text or formula, or events

in a given sequence in a systemic.

- -To reduce guessing use large size systemics-

-[pentagonal,hexagonal.]..,

,

Page 11: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Disadvantage

-Do not allow instructors to measure

students' writing skills.

Advantages

-Reduces the effects of guessing.

-Highly reliable exam scores.

,

Page 12: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

) ( --30

-60

-30

x 5

) (

120 60

-30

-60

-30

x 5

A)

150 30

Example 1 : ]Math.[ :Put the following numbers in the correct sequence in the following

systemic diagram: 30,60,120,150

ILO: Synthesis

Page 13: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

) ( Mg

HCl gas

Conc. H2SO4

) (

Fe FeCl2

Mg

HCl gas

Air/ heat

Conc. H2SO4

A)

Fe2( SO4)3FeCl3

Example 2 : ]Chem.[ :Put the iron and its compounds in the right places in the following

systemic diagram: Fe, FeCI2, FeCI3, Fe2)SO4(3,

Air/ heat

ILO: Synthesis

Page 14: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

VII-Synthesize Systemic relations between concepts, facts, issues,

Requires the Student to Position

concepts or formulas,

or events or issues ,numbers

and their relations

in a systemic diagram

,

Page 15: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Disadvantage

-Do not allow instructors to measure

students' writing skills.

Advantages

-Can measure various kinds of knowledge,

including students' ability to

correlate between concepts, formula, or events.

,

Page 16: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

- Can assess higher-order thinking skills.

- Reduces the effects of guessing.

- Highly reliable Questions scores.

Page 17: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

) (

100 50

-50

÷

25+

X 2

A-I)

150 75

) (

75 100

+25

÷2

+100

A-II)

150 50

Example-1 : ]Math.[ :Build a correct systemic shows the numerical relations between the

following numbers: 50, 75,100,150:

Page 18: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Example-2 : ]Chem.[ :

Build a systemic diagram Shows the correct chemical

relations between; Fe FeCI2, FeCI3, Fe2)SO4(3:

) (

Fe FeCl2

Mg

HCl gas

Air/ heat

Conc. H2SO4

A)

Fe2( SO4)3FeCl3

Page 19: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

VIII-Analyze Systemic to its

Components

Requires the Student to Analyze

the given systemic diagram to its

concepts or formula, numbers, or events

with their relations.

Page 20: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Disadvantage

-Do not allow instructors to measurestudents writing skills.

Advantages

-Reduces the effects of guessing.

- Highly reliable Questions scores.

-Can assess higher-order thinking skills in which students are able

to analyze, synthesize.

Page 21: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

) (

100 50

-50

25+

X 2150 75

Example- : ]Math.[ :Analyze the following numerical systemic into mathematical

relations:

÷ 50 + 25 = 7 5150 - 50 = 100

75 X 2 = 150 2 = 50 ÷100

A)

ILO: Analysis

Page 22: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

IX-Complete Systemics

Requires the Student to Complete the

Systemic Diagram with the given missing

concepts or formula,numbers

or events and/or relations.

Page 23: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

Advantages

-Reduces the effects of guessing.

- Highly reliable Questions scores.

-Can assess higher-order thinking skills in which students are able

to analyze, synthesize.

Page 24: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

) (

Fe

Mg

HCl gas

Air/ heat

Conc. H2SO4

a)

Example : ]Chem.[ :Complete the following systemic diagram by using the Following

compounds to give correct systemic:, FeCI2, Fe2)SO4(3,FeCl3

) (

Fe FeCl2

Mg

HCl gas

Air/ heat

Conc. H2SO4

b)

Fe2( SO4)3FeCl3

Page 25: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

References:1-Fahmy, A. F. M., Lagowski, J. J; Systemic Reform in Chemical Education ,

An International Perspective, J. Chem. Edu., 2003, 80 )9(, 1078.

2-Fahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J., Using SATL Techniques to Assess Student Achievement ,

]18th ICCE, Istanbul Turkey, 3-8, August 2004.[

3-ahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J.,” Systemic multiple choice questions( SMCQs )in Chemistry

]“ 19th ICCE, Seoul, South Korea, 12-17 August 2006.[

4-Fahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J , “Systemic Problem solving ]SPS[ to Assess Student Achievement

in Chemistry”]42 IUPAC Congress, 2-7 Aug.2009[

5-Colleen M. and Bull, J.; Workshop on designing objective test questions .CAA center )http://caacenter.ac.uk/ university of luton, luton UK.

Page 26: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II

6-Writing Multiple Choice Items which Require Comprehensionby Russell A. Dewey, PhD

http://www.psychwww.com/selfquiz/aboutq.htm

7-McMillan, J. H. )2001(. Classroom assessment Principles and practice for effective instruction. Boston:

Allyn and Bacon..

8 -http://web.utk.edu/~mccay/apdm/match/match_b.htm

Page 27: SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010 PART-II