synchrony in neural systems: a very brief, biased, basic view tim lewis uc davis nimbios workshop on...

29
Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Upload: walter-lindsey

Post on 17-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Synchrony in Neural Systems:a very brief, biased, basic view

Tim LewisUC Davis

NIMBIOS Workshop on SynchronyApril 11, 2011

Page 2: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

neurons

cell type- intrinsic properties (densities of ionic channels, pumps, etc.)- morphology (geometry) - noisy, heterogeneous

synapsessynapses

~20nm

pre-synaptic cell

post-synaptic cell

synaptic dynamics- excitatory/inhibitory;

electrical- fast/slow- facilitating/depressing - noisy, heterogeneous- delays

connectivity

network topology- specific structure- random; small world, local- heterogeneous

components of neuronal networks

Page 3: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

function and

dysfunction

activity in neuronal networks,

e.g.synchron

y

intrinsic properties of

neurons

synaptic dynamics

connectivity of neural circuits

a fundamental challenge in neuroscience

function

Page 4: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

why could “synchrony” be important for function in neural systems?

1. coordination of overt behavior: locomotion, breathing, chewing, etc.

shrimp swimming

example: crayfish swimming

B. Mulloney et al

Page 5: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

why could “synchrony” be important for function in neural systems?

1. coordination of overt behavior: locomotion, breathing, chewing, etc.

2. cognition, information processing (e.g. in the cortex) …?1

.5-4

.5m

m

Should we expect synchrony in the cortex?

Page 6: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

1.5

-4.5

mm

Should we expect synchrony in the cortex?

Page 7: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Figure 1: A geodesic net with 128 electrodes making scalp contact with a salinated sponge material is shown (Courtesy Electrical Geodesics, Inc). This is one of several kinds of EEG recording methods. Reproduced from Nunez (2002).

time (sec)

g

a

q

“raw”

EEG recordings

EEG: “brain waves”: behavioral correlates, function/dysfunction

Page 8: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

in vivo g-band (30-70 Hz) cortical oscillations.

large-scale cortical oscillations arise from synchronous activity in neuronal networks

Page 9: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

how can we gain insight into the functions and dysfunctions related to neuronal synchrony?

1. Develop appropriate/meaningful ways of measuring/quantifying synchrony.

2. Identify mechanisms underlying synchronization – both from the dynamical and biophysical standpoints.

Page 10: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

1. measuring correlations/levels of synchrony

Swadlow, et al.

i. limited spatio-temporal data.

ii. measuring phase

iii. spike-train data (embeds “discrete” spikes in continuous time)

iv. appropriate assessment of chance correlations.

v. higher order correlations (temporally and spatially)

Page 11: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

synchrony in

neuronal networks

intrinsic properties of

neurons

synaptic dynamics

connectivity of neural circuits

2. identify mechanisms underlying synchrony

Page 12: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

“fast” excitatory synapses

synchrony

“slow” excitatory synapse

asynchrony

[mechanism A] synchrony in networks of neuronal oscillators

movie:LIFfastEsynch.avi

movie:LIFslowEasynch.avi

Page 13: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Some basic mathematical frameworks:

1. phase models (e.g. Kuramoto model)

N

kjkkjj

Njjj

Hw

NjHdt

d

1

1

)(

,...,1),,...,(

[mechanism A] synchrony in networks of neuronal oscillators

)1,0[j

Page 14: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Some basic mathematical frameworks:

2. theory of weak coupling (Malkin, Neu, Kuramoto, Ermentrout-Kopell, …)

N

kjkkjj

N

k

T

kosynjkjjj

Hw

NjtdTtVITtZT

wdt

d

1

1 0

)(

,...,1,~~~)~(

1

[mechanism A] synchrony in networks of neuronal oscillators

iPRCsynaptic current

Page 15: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

phase response curve (PRC) Dq(q)

quantifies the phase shifts in response to small, brief

(d-function) input at different phases in the oscillation.

Page 16: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

infinitesimal phase response curve (iPRC) Z(q)

the PRC normalized by the stimulus “amplitude” (i.e. total charge delivered).

Page 17: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

[mechanism A] synchrony in networks of neuronal oscillators

Some mathematical frameworks:

2. spike-time response curve (STRC) maps

k phase difference between pair of coupled neurons when neuron 1 fires for the kth time.

phase response curve for neuron for a given stimulus..

))1(()1(1 kkkkk

Page 18: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

k

threshold

blue cell has just been reset after crossing threshold.

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

Page 19: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

k

threshold

red cell hits threshold.

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

Page 20: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

12k

blue

threshold

blue cell is phase advanced by synaptic input from red cell; red cell is reset.

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

)1(21 kkk

Page 21: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

12k

threshold

blue cell hits threshold.

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

Page 22: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

blue

12k

red

threshold

red cell is phase advanced by synaptic input from blue cell; blue cell is reset.

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

Page 23: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

red

1k

blue

threshold

k

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

)(21

211

kkk

Page 24: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

(similar to Strogatz and Mirillo, 1990)

pair of coupled cells: reduction to 1-D map

* shape of Z determines phase-locking dynamics

)1(21 kkk

)(21

211

kkk

))1(()1(1 kkkkk

Page 25: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

[mechanism B] correlated/common input into oscillating or excitable cells (i.e., the neural Moran effect)

input

output

… possible network coupling too

Page 26: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

[mechanism C] self-organized activity in networks of excitable neurons: feed-forward networks

e.g. AD Reyes, Nature Neurosci 2003

Page 27: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

l=0.0001, 75x50 network, rc=50, c=0.37

[mechanism C] self-organized activity in networks of excitable neurons: random networks

(i) Topological target patterns units: excitable dynamics with low level of random spontaneous activation (Poisson process); network connectivity: sparse (Erdos-Renyi) random network; strong bidirectional coupling.

e.g. Lewis & Rinzel, Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 2000

movie:topotargetoscill.avi

Page 28: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

(i) topological target patterns waves

(ii) reentrant waves

[mechanism C] self-organized rhythms in networks of excitable neurons

e.g. Lewis & Rinzel, Neuroomput. 2001

spontaneous random activation stops

spontaneous random activation stops

Page 29: Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011

Conclusions / Discussions / Open questions