sustainable forest management: is everything in order but the patient still dying?
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainable Forest Management:
Is Everything in Order but the Patient Still Dying?
Session 147: Demonstrating Sustainable Forest Management
XXII IUFRO WORLD CONGRESS8-13 August 2005, Brisbane
Robert Nasi, Center for International Forestry Research
Outline
Tropical forests
Some recent positive trends
Reality check
Lesson learned
Conclusions
Some implications for forestry research
Tropical forests
Tropical forests
Are the most biodiversity rich terrestrial ecosystem but are under unprecedented pressure for agricultural land and forest goods and services
Protected areas are essential to conserve tropical forests and their biodiversity but protected areas alone won’t work
Most of the important biodiversity will be conserved or lost in managed forests used to produce timber and other goods.
Some recent positive trends
The area of tropical forests under protection has increased dramatically
The area of tropical forests under formal management is quickly increasing
New, powerful management tools are available
Markets value forests for what they are (certification, payment for environmental services)
A growing proportion of forests is owned and/or managed by communities living in and by these forests
We witness emerging new paradigms for natural resource management
Everything in order?
Reality check
Tropical forests continue to be destroyed or degraded at an alarming rate
A large part of tropical forests, either or not in protected areas, either owned or not by communities, is still in a situation of
uncontrolled harvesting of forest resources (from logging to hunting or NTFP collection)
under antiquated, inadequate and poorly enforced legal frameworks
facing increasing land conversion for agriculture and spontaneous colonization
with widespread corruption at all levels
Reality check, managed timber production forests
Basic tenets, from European models ‘exported’ to the tropics in the 50s, have not really changed
Existing plans are often based on unrealistic prescriptions hindering their adoption by a large part of the operators or pushing them into illegal activities
Concern mainly large concessions in untouched forests whereas there is an increasing number of small to medium scale enterprises working in secondary or logged-over forests.
Reality check, success stories
There is however a growing portfolio of (partial) successes in managing tropical forests for production:
Managed timber concessions (Latin America, Africa, South-East Asia)
Joint Forest Management (India)
Community based forestry (Central America and Mexico, Nepal)
Environmental NGOs - logging companies partnerships (Central Africa, Indonesia)
What do failures and success stories
tell us?
Lessons learned
We must change the main conceptual model of tropical forest management, look for new paradigms and apply them
We need to rethink our concept of sustainability in the context of the management of production tropical forests
Lessons learned: shifting paradigms
The long-standing approach to management of (marine) resources is based on a flawed
conceptual model: the ‘optimal’ harvesting of targeted stocks in systems that are assumed
to be reasonably stable
An emerging approach rejects this paradigm in favor of management practices that recognize
coupled socio-ecological systems that are characterized by complex dynamics and
thresholds, with multiple possibleoutcomes and inherent uncertainties
Hughes et al. (2005)
Sustained production of a single commodity (sustained yield forestry)Sustained production of multiple goods and services (multiple use forestry)Sustained production of multiple goods and services while maintaining future options and not damaging other ecosystems (sustainable forest management)Strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way (ecosystem approach, INRM)
Lessons learned: shifting paradigms
Lessons learned: sustainability
None of the actual forest management approaches is really ‘sustainable’ in the tropical forest context
Forest composition inevitably change
Some species are lost or become to rare for use
New ecosystems emerge with new properties
Altered ecosystems will not revert to their original wilderness condition by relieving stressors (e.g. logging)
Success stories are more about building resilient adaptable socio-ecological systems than about achieving sustainability
Lessons learned: sustainability
The following points appear essential in building resilient socio-ecological systems:
consider both people’s interests and natural resources
mix top-down and bottom-up approaches
rely on partnerships and negotiated approaches
recognize and use local knowledge
avoid complex or unrealistic rules and regulations
monitor carefully but allow for adaptation and learning
foster and use technical progress
taylor-made management solutions are always superior to generic ones
Lessons learned, in summary…
Do not try to achieve “Sustainability”
Avoid irreversibility
Allow change but manage for resilience
Recognize linkages between environment and people
Recognize that uncertainty is inevitable and design flexible management regimes
Do not wait, take decisions based upon a careful assessment of potential risks and costs
Learn by doing and from others and use what you have learned
Is the patient dying?
Is the ‘managed’ patient dying?
My answer is ‘no’ but it is sure suffering and will certainly change because of us
We must learn to adapt our management to the emerging new modified ecosystems we created and not only focus on ‘primary-like’ ecosystems
We should envision Sustainable Forest Management as a co-evolutionary process between the changing forest, the changing market and an industry moving toward higher efficiency standards over time
The aim should be maintenance of functional forest ecosystems providing a continuous flow of goods and services
Some implications for forestry research
The endless search of a globally accepted definition of SFM is pointless
Research should consider various scales both spatial and temporal; results from short term, local experiments should be used with caution and always subject to revision
Forestry researchers should open-up, learn from and team up with others (health, marine sector)
Disciplinary approaches are doomed to fail and trans-disciplinary training should become part of forest research curriculums
Thank you