survival of the quarantine root-knot nematodes m....

21
University: Gent Faculty: Science Department: Biology ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-2015 Survival of the quarantine root-knot nematodes M. chitwoodi and M. fallax in waste products of the processing industry Martin Baiye Baiye Promoter: Prof. dr. ir. Wim Wesemael Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Nematology

Upload: nguyenlien

Post on 08-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

University: Gent

Faculty: Science

Department: Biology

ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-2015

Survival of the quarantine root-knot nematodes M.

chitwoodi and M. fallax in waste products of the processing

industry

Martin Baiye Baiye

Promoter: Prof. dr. ir. Wim Wesemael Thesis submitted to obtain the degree of

Master of Science in Nematology

Survival of the quarantine root-knot nematodes M.

chitwoodi and M. fallax in waste products of the processing

industry

Martin B. BAIYE1, Wim M. L. WESEMAEL1,2,

1University of Ghent, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, K.L Ledeganckstraat 35,

9000, Ghent, Belgium

2 Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Burgemeester Van Gansberghelaan

96, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium

1

SUMMARY

Root-knot nematodes (RKN), Meloidogyne spp., are ubiquitous plant pests that affect a wide

range of crops thereby posing enormous threat to global food security. The quarantine species

M. chitwoodi and M. fallax have become prevalent in some potato and vegetable production

areas causing significant crop losses. Effective treatment of waste soil from the potato and

vegetable processing industry is important to avoid the dissemination of these nematodes. This

study was designed to examine the effect of different temperature treatments on the survival of

M. chitwoodi, M. fallax and M. incognita. Both incubator and warm water bath treatments were

used in this study. For incubator treatment of second-stage juveniles (J2), survival after 40°C

during 1 hour was high with 88.12 ± 2.38%, 85.26 ± 2.46% and 94.11 ± 1.69% survivals for M.

chitwoodi, M. fallax, and M. incognita respectively. Lowest survival was recorded at 50°C for

M. chitwoodi and M. fallax and at 60°C for the tropical M. incognita (0% survival). The lowest

hatching percentage (hp < 5%) for egg masses for both quarantine nematodes and M. incognita

was reported at 50°C and 60°C respectively. For warm water bath experiments, highest survival

of J2 was observed at 40°C for quarantine species and at 50°C for M. incognita. Nonetheless,

lowest hatching percentage (hp < 5%) was observed at 50°C for all species. Generally,

temperature influences the survival and hatching of juveniles with survival decreasing with

increase in temperature and time. Warm water treatment seems more effective than incubator

treatment and is recommended as an efficient treatment option. Further studies are required to

examine the difference in hatching percentage between warming up egg masses from an initial

room temperature to that of a stable temperature regime.

Key words: Quarantine nematodes, hatching, survival, heat treatments, waste soil

2

INTRODUCTION

A major global challenge facing the agricultural sector is the need to enhance food security for

a constantly increasing human population (De Waele & Elsen, 2007). Food or agricultural

product is plaque with several plant pathogens and pests which include several viruses, bacteria,

fungi, insects and nematodes. Plant-parasitic nematodes are among the most economically

damaging pest on horticultural and field crops, causing an estimated US$100 billion loss

globally on an annual basis (Oka et al., 2000). These nematodes have an exceedingly wide host

range and survive varying environmental conditions (Perry, 1999).

Among plant-parasitic nematodes, root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax)

have become prevalent in potato and vegetable production causing significant crop losses

(Wesemael et al., 2011). These nematodes have been reported from Argentina, Belgium,

Germany, Netherlands, USA, Mexico, Portugal, France, Switzerland and South Africa

(OEPP/EPPO, 2009;Wesemael et al., 2011). Nonetheless, M. chitwoodi was also reported in

Turkey and M. fallax has so far been detected in New Zealand, Australia and UK (Van Der

Gaag et al., 2012). An evaluation of pest risk analysis showed that these pests could establish

wherever potatoes can be grown and coarse soil texture with high sand content is considered to

favor establishment (Suffert & Giltrap, 2012).

However, in addition to direct root damage, the gall-forming sedentary endoparasites elicit

infection by secondary pathogens such as fungi and bacteria and therefore, act as a major cause

of preventable crop disease and yield loss (Nicol et al., 2011). Above-ground symptoms are not

readily apparent, but may consist of various degrees of stunting, lack of vigor and wilting under

moisture stress (OEPP/EPPO, 2004). Nevertheless, substantial crop losses from RKN could be

much greater if species currently causing localized damage (e.g. quarantine spp.) became more

widespread (Singh et al., 2013). For example, cumulative losses from potato cyst nematodes

introduction to Australia were estimated at 370 million AUD over 20 years (Hodda & Cook,

2009), and Pine wood nematode introduction to Europe estimated at 22 billion EUR over 22

years (Soliman et al., 2012).

Dispersal or dissemination of the plant-parasitic nematodes is largely restricted to the

movement of soil (McNeill et al., 2006), infected plants and planting materials. In the

processing industry, plant-parasitic nematodes can be found on heaps of muddy waste,

including soil washed off vegetables and vegetable waste, waste water and mud from lagoons

where the waste water collects (Gamon & Lenne, 2012). Nevertheless, infested waste soil can

3

also be found in potato and vegetable farms (Akhtar, 1993), crop stock warehouses and adhering

to harvesting machines and transport vehicles. Thus, effective treatment of waste soil before

disposal is essential to avoid further spreading of the quarantine root-knot nematode M.

chitwoodi and M. fallax. Moreover, in Belgium it’s prohibited to grow crops from which the

below ground parts are harvested in M. chitwoodi or M. fallax infested soil to avoid further

spread. Only when a sound system to treat waste products is in place, this measure might be

altered.

In this study, different temperature treatments of sterilized soil inoculated with M. chitwoodi,

M. fallax and M. incognita at varying temperatures were investigated. The effect of temperature

on survival was then examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nematode cultures

Three nematodes species were used in this study (Meloidogyne chitwoodi, M. fallax and M.

incognita). Cultures of these nematode species were obtained from the ILVO stock cultures and

maintained on tomato plants in plastic pots (1.5l) filled with sandy soil under temperature

controlled glass house conditions (16 hours light, 17-26°C). Roots of the tomato plants were

harvested between 6 to 7 weeks after inoculation. The roots were washed, cut into small pieces

of 1-2 cm and placed on a modified Baermann’s funnel (Hooper, 1986) in order to obtain freshly

hatched J2s. The Baermann’s funnel technique (Baermann, 1917) is based on the motility of

nematodes and enables nematodes to be separated from organic material. To obtain egg masses,

fresh roots were kept in water and under a binocular microscope (50× objective) small root

pieces containing a female with egg mass were cut from the roots with a scalpel. The root pieces

with the egg mass were transferred to a water filled plate and kept for further use.

Preparation of juveniles and egg masses

Freshly hatched J2 (<24 hour) were tapped from the Baermann’s funnel. The nematodes were

allowed to settle for about 20 minutes and a vacuum pump (Vacuubrand, BVC 21) was used to

suck out the excess water. The remaining volume in the beaker was noted using a measuring

cylinder. The content in the beaker was homogenized by blowing thin air through a 10ml pipette

and subsamples (1ml) taken and transferred into a counting dish. Successive counts of juveniles

per subsamples were noted aided by a counter. The average number of juveniles per subsamples

4

was then obtained and multiplied by the total volume to obtain the total number of juveniles in

the total sample. Subsamples of 100 J2 to be inoculated were obtained by multiplying the

number (100 J2) by the total volume divided by the total juveniles (Total volume × 100 J2/Total

juveniles).

For egg masses, root pieces containing 1 egg mass were picked and placed on a filter (mesh

size of 48 µm) in a small sieve. A second filter was then placed on top of the one beneath to

hold the egg mass in place and the sieve was closed for firmed grip. The sieves with the egg

masses were then placed unto a glass plate filled with water ready for use.

Sterile soil preparation

Sandy soil composed of 74% sand, 17% sandy loam, 3% loam and 6% clay and sterilized at

100°C for 16 hours, was filtered through a metal sieve of 3.055 mm into a bath. The dry soil

was measured and water was added to obtain 20% humidity. The soil was mixed thoroughly

for homogeneity to keep the soil moist for further use.

Temperature experiments for juveniles and egg masses

To examine the effect of temperature on survival, both incubator (Binder 53) and warm water

bath (Grant Y14) treatments were used. In all cases, two temperature regimes were noted with

10 replicates each, the warmed up regime (wu) and a desired temperature regime. Each test

sample was labelled appropriately and ran for 1 or 2 hours. In the warm water bath experiment,

the test samples were placed in a rack and immersed in the warm water with the water level

slightly above the soil in the tube to ensure uniform temperature. For the incubator experiment,

the samples were placed in a plastic plate of about 26cm in diameter and into the incubator with

the set temperature.

For juveniles’ incubator experiments, 30g of prepared sterile soil was filled into tubes (3.2cm

in diameter and 5.5cm height) and 50ml test tubes (3.1cm in diameter by 11.6cm height) were

used in warm water bath experiments. A micropipette was used to inoculate subsamples of 100

J2 into the tubes. The test sample tubes were then placed in an incubator or warm water bath

depending on the desired experiment. For M. chitwoodi and M. fallax, the experiments were

run in an incubator and warm water bath at 40°C and 50°C. For M. incognita, the experiment

was run at 40°C, 50°C and 60°C for incubator treatment, 40°C and 50°C for warm water bath

treatment.

5

For the experiment with egg mass, 15g of prepared sterile soil was filled into the test tubes.

Sieves containing egg masses were transferred unto the test tubes with a gentle push. Additional

15g of soil was then added on top of the sieve in the tube to ensure it was properly covered.

Control treatments for the experiments were established for juveniles and egg masses as

described above but sample tubes were kept at room temperature and the number of live J2 and

hatched juveniles from egg masses were counted with time.

Nematode extraction

Automatic zonal centrifuge was used for nematode extraction (Hendrickx, 1995). The principle

is based on the density of the nematode.

Extraction was done one day after treatment. For juveniles, tubes with soil (30g) were properly

rinsed with water in a 1000ml beaker. A second beaker of 100ml (receiver) was labelled

correspondingly with the first and both were placed on the automatic zonal centrifuge for the

extraction process to begin. After the extraction, the beaker (100ml) with the nematodes was

allowed to stand for at least 3 hours for the nematodes to settle. A vacuum pump was then used

to suck out the excess water to facilitate counting.

For egg masses, both the soil and the sieves were rinsed thoroughly with water in a beaker.

Sieves with egg masses were then transferred to small glass bottles with their corresponded

labelings. Water was then added to ensure the sieves were immersed completely in the water.

The glass bottles were then closed with a perforated lid or parafilm for ventilation. The bottles

were kept at room temperature and hatched juveniles counted on a weekly basis for 4 weeks.

On the fourth week, the egg masses were crushed with a few drops of Sodium hypochlorite

aided with a small glass rod of about 15cm. Both juveniles and unhatched eggs were counted.

Counting of nematodes

A binocular microscope (50× objective), handling needle and a hand tally counter were used to

count nematodes. J2 were counted and separated based on live or dead. Live juveniles were

detected by observing movement. Seemingly, dead J2 were stimulated with the handling needle

and monitored for possible movement.

6

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Version 5 for Windows (GraphPad

Software, San Diego California USA) and Excel 2013 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation).

The hatching data obtained were fitted to the logistic model y = c/(1+exp (-b×(time-m))), where

y is the cumulative % hatch; the model is described by three parameters: the time at which 50%

of the hatch is reached (m), the hatching rate (b) and the final hatching percentage (c)

(Wesemael et al., 2006). Those parameters were calculated for all replicates and all treatments.

Mortality rates as well as m, b and c values were subjected to the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality

and when data was found to be non-normally distributed, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney

and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. For more Gaussian data, the Student’s t test for grouped

data and one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett ׳s multiple comparisons test or

Bonferroni correction were used as appropriate to compare mortalities between and within

treatments. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Unless otherwise stated,

error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM) values.

Table 1: Treatments, times and number of replicates for Juveniles

Treatments Temp. Time Replicates

Incubator

M. chitwoodi M. fallax M. incognita

40°C 60 mins. 10 10 10

40°C 60 mins. + wu 10 10 10

40°C 120 mins 10 10 10

40°C 120 mins.+ wu 10 10 10

50°C 60 mins 10 10 10

50°C 60 mins. + wu 10 10 10

50°C 120 mins 10

50°C 120 mins + wu 10

60°C 60 mins 10

60°C 60 mins + wu 10

Warm water

40°C 60 mins 10 10 10

40°C 60 mins + wu 10 10 10

50°C 60 mins 10

50°C 60mins + wu 10

Control 10 10 10

7

Table 2: Treatments, times and number of replicates for egg masses

Treatments Temp. Time Replicas

Incubator

M. chitwoodi M. fallax M. incognita

40°C 60 mins. 10 10 10

40°C 120 mins. 10 10 10

50°C 60 mins 10 10 10

60°C 60 mins 10

Warm water

40°C 60 mins 10 10 10

50°C 60 mins 10 10 10

Control 10 10 10

Wu = warm up

RESULTS

Incubator treatment

Juveniles

Generally, temperature treatment on J2s of quarantine root-knot nematodes (M. chitwoodi and

M. fallax) and a tropical species (M. incognita), had an effect on the survival of the J2s.

For M. chitwoodi, there was a significant effect between treatments and the control (F = 486.4,

P = 0.001). However, treatment of J2 at 40°C for 1 or 2 hours did not differ significantly from

the control (P > 0.05), with mean survival values of 87.72 ± 3 %, 86 ± 4 % and 90.16 ± 5 %

respectively. Moreover, there was no significant difference in survival between treatment at

40°C for an hour and treatment at 40°C for 2 hours with mean survival values of 87.72 ± 3 %

and, 86 ± 4 % respectively. In addition, when the J2s were exposed to 40°C for an hour, it did

not make a significant difference whether they had the time to warm up or not with the control

(F = 1.166, P = 0.3268). Similarly, there was no significant difference in survival when J2 were

exposed to 40°C for 2 hours with the warm up regime (86.1 ± 4.2 %). The survival was highest

in the warming up treatments at 40°C for 1 hour with 88.12 ± 2.38% survival and least at 50°C

(0% survival) (Figure 1).

Similarly, for M. fallax, heat treatments had a significant effect on the survival (F = 327.9, P =

0.001). Survival was highest at 40°C for 1 hour in the warm up regime (85.26 ± 2.46 %) and

8

least at 50oC for 1 hour (100% mortality). However, neither the survival for an hour nor 2 hours

at 40°C differed significantly from the control (P > 0.05), with mean survival of 83.75 ± 3.82

%, 83.73 ± 4.3 % and 86.5 ± 4.13 % respectively (Figure 1). Again, treatment for an hour at

40°C did not differ significantly from treatment at 40°C for 2 hours. Moreover, there was no

significant effect in treatments between warming up the juveniles to a desired temperature and

a stable temperature regime with the control (F = 0.7769, P = 0.4698). Nevertheless,

temperature has little or no influence on the survival between warming up and not warming up

the juveniles at 40°C for 1 or 2 hours (P > 0.05), with mean values of 85.26 ± 2.5 %, 83.75 ±

3.82 % for 1 hour and 83.75 ± 3.82 % and 83.73 ± 4.3 % for 2 hours accordingly.

Contrary to M. chitwoodi and M. fallax, M. incognita showed slightly different results. The

lowest survival was observed at 60°C (100% mortality) as opposed to 50°C for quarantine

species. Moreover, M. incognita showed highest survival (94.11 ± 2.66 %) at 40°C (+ wu)

among the different species examined. Although, heat treatment had a significant effect on the

survival (F = 369.7, P = 0.001), treatment at 40°C for 1 or 2 hours did not differ significantly

from each other and the control (P > 0.05) with mean survival values of 93.47 ± 2.52 %, 92.94

± 1.93 % and 94.37 ± 2.66 % respectively. However, treatment at 50°C for 1 and 2 hours

differed significantly from each other and the control (P < 0.05) with mean values of 30.08 ±

7.42 %, 21.3 ± 9.95 % and 94.37 ± 2.66 % correspondingly. Nonetheless, there was no

difference in survival between the warm up regime and a fixed temperature regime (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Mean survival of second-stage juveniles from Meloidogyne chitwoodi, M. fallax

and M. incognita after heat treatments in an incubator during different time periods. (wu

= juveniles exposure in the incubator at room temperature and warm up to the given

temperature)

Egg masses

0

20

40

60

80

100

M. chitwoodi M. fallax M. incognita

Surv

ival

(%

)

Control

wu + 40°C for 60 mins.

40°C for 60 mins.

wu + 40°C 120 mins.

40°C for 120 mins.

wu + 50°C for 60 mins.

50°C for 60 mins.

wu + 50°C for 120 mins.

50°C for 120 mins

wu + 60°C for 60 mins.

9

Similar to the juveniles, heat treatment had an influence on the hatching percentage of J2s from

RKN.

For M. chitwoodi, temperature incubator treatment had an effect on the hp (F = 34.88, P =

0.001), hatching rate and the time at which 50% of the hatching is reached (F = 6.761, P =

0.0042). The lowest hatching percentage (hp < 5%) was obtained with the treatments at 50°C

for 1 hour (Fig. 2). Moreover, at 40°C, the hatching percentage for 1 (88.3 ± 4.64 %) or 2 hours

(62.68 ± 12.1%) differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). However, the hp for 1 hour

(86.09 ± 2.29 %) did not differ from the control (Fig. 2, Table 3).

Also, for M. fallax, temperature had an influence on the hatching percentage (P = 0.001). The

lowest hp was observed at 50°C (hp < 5%). Moreover, the final hp for 1 (91.04 ± 6.1245 %) or

2 hours (65.6 ± 9.69 %), control (93.48 ± 2.55 %) and 2 hours at 40°C differed significantly

from each other (P < 0.05). However, the hp at 40°C for 1 hour did not differ from the untreated

control (P > 0.05). In addition, the time at which 50 % of the hatching was reached was

significantly different across the different treatment and the control (P = 0.001). No effect of

temperature on the hatching rate was observed (P = 0.1352) (Fig. 3, Table 3).

For M. incognita, the hp differed across the different treatments (P = 0.001). Although the hp

was higher for the treatment at 40°C for 1 hour (94.45 ± 0.83 %) than the untreated control

(93.32 %), the effect was not significant. Neither did temperature had an effect on the untreated

control and treatment at 40°C for 2 hours. However, temperature did influence the hp at 50°C

for 1 hour. The lowest hatching percentage was observed at 60°C for 1 hour (hp < 5%).

In figure 4, the hatching patterns can be seen for M. incognita. Heat treatment did not influence

the moment at which 50% of the hatching was reached (P = 0.2532). However, the hatching

rate was affected (P = 0.001) (Table 3).

10

Table 3: Parameters of the logistic curve y = c/(1 + exp(-b×(time-m))) describing hatching

of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne chitwoodi, M. fallax and M. incognita at heat

treatment in an incubator at different time period. The results are the means of 10

replicates of the time at which 50% of the total hatching is reached (m), the hatching rate

(b) and the maximum hatching percentage (c).

Warm water treatment

Juveniles

Like incubator treatment, warm water treatment had an influence on the survival of quarantine

and tropical nematodes with very high variability between both treatments.

M. chitwoodi recorded highest survival at 40°C for 1 hour (1.21 ± 1.81 %). The influence of

temperature on survival did not differ significantly between 1 and 2 hours (100% mortality) at

40°C (P > 0.05). The treatments differed significantly with the control (F = 357, P = 0.001). In

addition, when the J2s were exposed to 40°C for an hour, there was no significant difference

whether they had the time to warm up or not (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5).

Similar results were obtained for M. fallax with 100% mortality at 40°C for 1 hour and the

treatment was significantly different from the control (P < 0.05). However, there was no

difference in survival between warming up the juveniles and not warming up.

Contrary to the above, M. incognita showed least survival at 50°C (100% mortality). The

highest survival was observed at 40°C for 1 hour (80.2 ± 7.59 %). Nevertheless, treatment

between 1 or 2 hours did not differ from each other but differed from the control (F = 509.4, P

= 0.001). Equally, there was no difference in survival between warming up the juveniles to a

desired temperature regime and a fixed temperature regime (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5).

Species Temp. Time m b c

M. chitwoodi 40°C 60 mins. 2.5 1.27 88.3

Control

40°C 120 mins. 3 1.5 62.7

2.6 1.23 86.1

M. fallax 40°C 60 mins. 2.3 1.36 91

Control

40°C 120 mins. 2.8 1.42 66

2.2 1.33 93.5

M. incognita 40°C 60 mins. 2.3 1.4 94.45

Control

40°C 120 mins. 2.5 1.32 88

50°C 60 mins. 2.6 1.67 42.7

2.4 1.28 93.3

11

Figure 5: Mean survival of second-stage juveniles from Meloidogyne chitwoodi, M. fallax

and M. incognita after heat treatments in warm water bath during different time periods.

(wu = juveniles exposure in the warm water at room temperature and warm up to the

given temperature)

Egg masses

From figure 2, it can be deduced that warm water treatment has an effect on the hatching

percentage (hp), the hatching rate and the time at which 50% of the hatching was reached (P <

0.05). For M. chitwoodi, the lowest hatching percentage was obtained at 50°C for 1 hour (hp <

5%). At 40°C for 1 hour, the hatching percentage was 19.6 ± 4.79 % (Table 4).

Likewise for M. fallax, temperature had an effect on the hp, the hatching rate and the time at

which 50% of the hatching was reached (Fig. 3). The hatching percentage was 24.9 ± 12.51 %

at 40°C for 1 hour. The lowest hatching percentage (hp <5%) was obtained at 50°C for 1 hour

(Fig. 3, Table 4).

For M. incognita, the hatching percentage at 40°C for 1 hour did not differ significantly from

the control (P = 0.2735), with mean hp of 91.77 ± 3.65 % and 93.3 ± 2.31 respectively (Table

4). The lowest hatching percentage (hp < 5%) was observed at 50°C for 1 hour. In addition, the

time at which 50% of the hatching was reached did not differ from the control. However,

temperature had a significant effect on the hatching rate (P = 0.001) (Fig. 4).

0

20

40

60

80

100

M. chitwoodi M. fallax M. incognita

Surv

ival

(%

)

Control

wu + 40°C for 60 mins.

40°C for 60 mins

wu + 40°C for 120 mins.

40°C for 120 mins

wu + 50°C for 60 mins.

50°C for 60 mins.

12

Table 4: Parameters of the logistic curve y = c/(1 + exp(-b×(time-m))) describing hatching

of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne chitwoodi, M. fallax and M. incognita at heat

treatment in warm water bath at different time period. The results are the means of 10

replicates of the time at which 50% of the total hatching is reached (m), the hatching rate

(b) and the maximum hatching percentage (c).

Species Temperature Time m b c

M. chitwoodi 40°C 60 mins. 2.1 1.22 19.6 Control 2.6 1.23 86.1 M. fallax 40°C 60 mins. 2.2 1.64 24.9 Control 2.2 1.33 93.5 M. incognita 40°C 60 mins. 2.2 1.74 91.8

Control 2.4 1.28 93.3

Figure 2: Hatching curve for M. chitwoodi for all treatments

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4

Hat

chin

g pe

rcen

tage

Weeks

Control Incubator 40°C for 1hr Incubator 40°C for 2hrs

Incubator 50°C for 1hr Warm water 40°C for 1hr Warm water 50°C for 1hr

13

Figure 3: Hatching curve for M. fallax for all treatments

Figure 4: Hatching curve for M. incognita for all treatments

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4

Hat

chin

g pe

rcen

tage

Weeks

control Incubator 40°C for 1hr Incubator 40°C for 2hrs

Incubator 50°C for 1hr Warm water 40°C for 1hr Warm water 50°C for 1hr

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4

Hat

chin

g p

erce

nta

ge

Weeks

control Incubator 40°C for 1hr Incubator 40°C for 2hrs

Incubator 50°C for 1hr Incubator 60°C for 1hr Warm water 40°C for 1hr

Warm water 50°C for 1hr

14

DISCUSSION

Temperature is an important environmental factor for organisms. Different organisms have

different optimal temperatures for normal activities and high and low temperature limits they

can tolerate. This is also true for nematodes (Tsai, 2008). Temperature has been shown to

influence all aspects of nematode life cycle and behavior including hatching, motility, invasion,

development and survival (Wallace, 1963; Davide & Triantaphyllou, 1967; Bird, 1972; Evans

& Perry, 2009). Knowledge on optimum or detrimental temperature regimes for survival of the

quarantine root-knot nematodes M. chitwoodi and M. fallax is essential for control while

preserving soil structure and nutrients.

Generally, in this study, it was observed that the survival of nematodes decreased with increase

in temperature, exposure time, type of treatment and vice versa. After heat treatment in an

incubator, survival of M. chitwoodi and M. fallax was highest at 40°C (≥ 88%) and least at 50°C

(0% survival) for J2s. This is not surprising because higher temperature has been proven to

lower the survival of nematodes in many studies (Sutherland & Sluggett, 1974; Geden & Axtell,

1988; Kung et al., 1991). Bridge (1996) observed that most treatments calls for temperatures

from 50 to 55°C to cause complete mortality of nematodes. For M. incognita, 60°C was required

to obtain 100% mortality. This might be due to the fact that as tropical species, M. incognita

may possessed a more tolerant heat resistant protein which protects the organism against

slightly elevated temperature. However, Tsai (2008) noted exposure time as being vital to cause

mortality of M. incognita at lower temperatures. He observed that 6 days was required to kill

J2 of M. incognita at 40°C (100% mortality). This also explains why ≥88% of quarantine

nematodes survived temperature at 40°C for 1 or 2 hours, noting time as an important factor.

Moreover, with the onset of global warming, it is possible that the temperate quarantine species

might be adjusting with a more heat tolerant protein as an adaptation for survival.

In this study, warm water bath treatment appears to be more effective than incubator treatment.

Least survival was attained at 40°C (0%) for M. fallax (50°C for incubator treatment) and 1.21%

survival was observed for M. chitwoodi for 1 hour. However, with increased in time (2 hours),

survival of M. chitwoodi decreased to 0% (50°C for incubator treatment). The same is true with

M. incognita where 0% survival was attained at 50°C as opposed to 60°C incubator treatment.

Earlier studies have reported decreased survival of J2s with time as well as decreased survival

of J2s with higher temperature but shorter time (Qiu et al., 1993; Tsai, 2008). Wang and

McSorley (2008) compared the exposure time to lethal temperatures for M.

15

incognita suppression with both warm water and soil solarization. They found that the hours of

exposure above a specific temperature to kill nematodes in soil solarization exceeded the

minimum number of hours required to kill 100% of M. incognita eggs or J2s as determined in

the warm water bath experiment. It is likely that warm water bath is more efficient because

water as the solvent, has higher heat capacity and thermal conductivity than air, and remains in

continuous contact with the test tube inoculated with nematodes, as such heat absorb by the

water are not easily dissipated.

For egg masses, temperature has a direct impact on the hatching of juveniles with decreasing

hatching percentages when temperatures are above the optimum for hatching (Bird, 1972;

Inserra et al., 1983; Charchar & Santo, 2001). In this study, the maximum hatching percentage

was observed at 40°C for all nematodes in both incubator and warm water bath experiments

while the minimum was noted at 60°C for M. incognita in incubator treatment and 50°C for M.

chitwoodi and M. fallax. For both experiments, M. fallax had higher hp than M. chitwoodi while

M. incognita had highest hp. However, Inserra et al. (1983) and Khan et al. (2014) observed

higher hp of M. chitwoodi than M. fallax at 20°C for 23 days and attributed the observed

differences to the protective role of the egg. Moreover, eggs used in this study were collected

from egg masses of approximately the same age, they may have differed in their embryonic

development (Khan et al., 2014).

The time at which 50% hatched was reach was similar for all species incubated for 1 hour

(approx. 2.5 weeks) at 40°C. However, with the exception of M. incognita at 40°C warm water

treatment where m was similar to incubator treatment at 40°C for 1 hour, delays in hatching

were noted for warm water bath treatment and species incubated for 2 hours. Charchar and

Santo (2001), Morris et al. (2011) and Khan et al. (2014) observed delayed hatching at lower

temperatures. However, this delay might be interpreted as egg being in diapause in response to

adverse condition. On the other hand, some eggs might not be viable as a result of extreme

temperature above their normal threshold which they can tolerate.

CONCLUSION

From the study, it was concluded that temperature treatment has an effect on the survival and

hatching percentage of M. chitwoodi, M. fallax and M. incognita. Survival decreased (hp

decreased) with increased temperature and time duration. The tropical species M. incognita was

more resistant to heat treatment than its temperate counterparts M. chitwoodi and M. fallax.

Moreover, warm water treatment was more efficient than incubator treatment and required

16

temperature at 40°C to cause complete mortality for M. chitwoodi and M. fallax whereas 50°C

was required for incubator treatment to attain 0% survival. However, M. incognita required

50°C for warm water treatment and 60°C for incubator treatment to achieve 0% survival.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Since warm water treatment is more efficient than incubator treatment, this treatment should

often be used in a processing industry to save time and energy and 50°C should be the optimum

temperature limit. In addition, this study did not take into account whether there is a difference

in hatching percentage between the warming up regime and a fixed temperature regime. Further

studies are necessary to examine these differences.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I heartily thank Almighty God for the grace, wisdom and good health granted to me throughout

this study.

I am immensely grateful to my promoter Prof. dr. Wim Wesemael for his prompt response,

constructive comments, critical review and closely following up of my research despite his busy

schedule. I will like to say working with him has been a privilege for me. My very earnest and

profound gratitude goes to Mr & Mrs Ojong Arrrey and Mr & Mrs Enoh Jean-Pierre who made

it possible through their spiritual, moral and financial support for my entire study.

Special thanks and gratitude to the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO) for

allowing me carryout my thesis and use their facilities throughout my research work. Also,

special thanks to the staff of ILVO for the pleasant atmosphere at the Institute. I want to say it

was a great opportunity working with them.

A word of gratitude goes to Nancy De Sutter for her guidance and helpful demonstrations in

the laboratory, Stephanie Beelaert who has always been there for helpful assistance and

directions throughout my work.

Finally, many thanks go to my entire family particularly my parents for their love and care.

Special thanks also go to Mr. & Mrs. Teboh for their material and financial assistance and not

given up on me.

17

REFERENCES

Akhtar, M. (1993). Utilisation of plant-origin waste materials for the control of plant-parasitic

nematodes. Bioresource technology 46, 255-257.

Baermann, G. (1917). Eine einfache methode zur auffindung von ankylostomum (Nematoden)

larven in erdproben. Geneeskunding Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indië 57, 131-137.

Bird, A. F. (1972). Influence of temperature on embryogenesis in Meloidogyne javanica.

Journal of nematology 4, 206.

Bridge, J. (1996). Nematode management in sustainable and subsistence agriculture. Annual

Review of Phytopathology 34, 201-225.

Charchar, J. M. & Santo, G. S. (2001). Effect of temperature on the embryogenic

development and hatching of Meloidogyne chitwoodi races 1 and 2 and M. hapla.

Nematologia brasileira 25, 71-77.

Davide, R. & Triantaphyllou, A. (1967). Influence of the environment on development and

sex differentiation of root-knot nematodes. Nematologica 13, 102-110.

De Waele, D. & Elsen, A. (2007). Challenges in tropical plant nematology. Annu. Rev.

Phytopathol. 45, 457-485.

Evans, A. A. & Perry, R. N. (2009). 9 Survival Mechanisms. Root-knot nematodes, 201.

Gamon, A. & Lenne, N. (2012). Meloidogyne chitwoodi and Meloidogyne fallax in France:

initial management experiences. EPPO Bulletin 42, 122-126.

Geden, C. & Axtell, R. (1988). Effect of temperature on nematode (Steinernema feltiae

[Nematoda: Steinernematidae]) treatment of soil for control of lesser mealworm

(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in turkey houses. Journal of economic entomology 81,

800-803.

Hendrickx, G. (1995). An automatic apparatus for extracting free-living nematode stages from

soil. Nematologica 41, 308.

Hodda, M. & Cook, D. (2009). Economic impact from unrestricted spread of potato cyst

nematodes in Australia. Phytopathology 99, 1387-1393.

Hooper, D. (1986). Extraction of nematodes from plant material. Laboratory methods for

work with plant and soil nematodes. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 51-58.

Inserra, R., Griffin, G. & Sisson, D. (1983). Effects of temperature and root leachates on

embryogenic development and hatching of Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. hapla.

Journal of nematology 15, 123.

18

Khan, A., Wesemael, W. M., Moes, M. (2014). Influence of temperature on the development

of the temperate root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax. Russian

journal of nematology 22 (1), 1-9.

Kung, S.-P., Gaugler, R. & Kaya, H. K. (1991). Effects of soil temperature, moisture, and

relative humidity on entomopathogenic nematode persistence. Journal of Invertebrate

Pathology 57, 242-249.

Mcneill, M., Phillips, C., Bell, N. & Proffitt, J. (2006). Potential spread of pests in New

Zealand through commercial transport of nursery plants. New Zealand Plant

Protection 59, 75.

Morris, K. S., Horgan, F. G., Downes, M. J. & Griffin, C. T. (2011). {null= The effect of

temperature on hatch and activity of second-stage juveniles of the root-knot nematode,

Meloidogyne minor, an emerging pest in north-west Europe, en= The effect of

temperature on hatch and activity of second-stage juveniles of the root-knot

nematode,< i> Meloidogyne minor</i>, an emerging pest in north-west Europe}.

Nematology 13, 985-993.

Nicol, J. M., Turner, S. J., Coyne, D., Den Nijs, L., Hockland, S. & Maafi, Z. T. (2011).

Current nematode threats to world agriculture. Genomics and molecular genetics of

plant-nematode interactions. Springer, pp. 21-43.

OEPP/EPPO, (2004). Post-entry quarantine for potato. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 34, 443-454.

OEPP/EPPO, (2009). Meloidogyne chitwoodi and Meloidogyne fallax. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin

39, 5-17.

Oka, Y., Koltai, H., Bar‐Eyal, M., Mor, M., Sharon, E., Chet, I. & Spiegel, Y. (2000). New

strategies for the control of plant‐parasitic nematodes. Pest Management Science 56,

983-988.

Perry, R. (1999). Desiccation survival of parasitic nematodes. Parasitology 119, S19-S30.

Qiu, J., Westerdahl, B., Giraud, D. & Anderson, C. (1993). Evaluation of hot water treatments

for management of Ditylenchus dipsaci and fungi in daffodil bulbs. Journal of

nematology 25, 686.

Singh, S., Hodda, M. & Ash, G. (2013). Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary

importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses. EPPO Bulletin 43, 334-374.

Soliman, T., Mourits, M. C., Van Der Werf, W., Hengeveld, G. M., Robinet, C. & Lansink,

A. G. O. (2012). Framework for modelling economic impacts of invasive species,

applied to pine wood nematode in Europe.

19

Suffert, M. & Giltrap, N. (2012). EPPO Workshop on Meloidogyne chitwoodi and

Meloidogyne fallax (2011‐03‐08): importance for potato production and experience of

management in EPPO countries. EPPO Bulletin 42, 117-121.

Sutherland, J. & Sluggett, L. (1974). Time, temperature and soil moisture effects on

Xiphinema bakeri nematode survival in fallow soil.

Tsai, B. Y. (2008). Effect of temperature on the survival of Meloidogyne incognita. Plant

Pathology Bulletin 17, 203-208.

Van der Gaag DJ, Viaene N, Anthoine A, Ilieva Z, Karssen G, Niere B (2012) Pest Risk

Assessment of Meloidogyne fallax: Revised Test method 2b. In: Pest Risk Assessment

for the European Community Plant Health: A Comparative Approach with Case

Studies (Eds MacLeod A, et al.), pp. 1053. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/

supporting/doc/319e.pdf [accessed on 13 November 2013].

Wallace, H. R. (1963). The biology of plant parasitic nematodes. The biology of plant

parasitic nematodes.

Wang, K.-H. & Mcsorley, R. (2008). Exposure time to lethal temperatures for Meloidogyne

incognita suppression and its implication for soil solarization. Journal of nematology

40, 7.

Wesemael, W. M., Perry, R. N. & Moens, M. (2006). The influence of root diffusate and host

age on hatching of the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax.

Nematology 8, 895-902.

Wesemael, W. M., Viaene, N. & Moens, M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne

spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13, 3-16.