survey of the rights of way in central poole and...

Don Nutt and Brian Martin

Rotary Club of Poole Bay

25/08/2011

2011Survey of the Rights of Way in central Poole and Old Town

Survey of the Rights of Way in central Poole and Old Town

Survey of the rights of way in central Poole and Old Town

Report of findings and recommendationsJuly 2011

Prepared for: Prepared by:

Sophia O’SullivanFootpaths Officer

Don Nutt and Brian Martinon behalf of

Borough of Poole Council Rotary Club of Poole Bay


SUMMARY 6

The Condition Survey 6

The condition of the public rights of way 6

The scope for improvements to the Rights of Way 7

A walking network for Poole 8

Regeneration and redevelopment issues 8

Next Steps 9

1. INTRODUCTION 10

Background to the project 10

The Rights of Way (ROW) Survey 11Figure 1.1 The 185 surveyed paths 12

The Condition Survey and this Report 13

The importance of Poole’s pedestrian links (the ROW and pavements beside the roads) 13

Pedestrian Links and the Redevelopment Areas 14

2 THE CONDITION SURVEY AND FINDINGS 15

Introduction 15

Summary of Findings 16General ambience 16Perceptions of personal security and safety 17

Specific Issues 18Signposting 18Surfacing 18Lighting 18Dropped Kerbs 18Barriers on the ROW 19Overhanging vegetation 19ROW of historic interest 19Bus Stops and Routes 19

Permissive paths 19

“Private” paths 20

Paths/ ROW having little purpose for the general public 20

Rotary Club of Poole Bay 2


Paths that cross car parks with no clear path or protection 20

Pedestrian use of the ROW 20

3 KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23

Improvements to the current condition of ROW 23Physical Improvements to the ROW 24

Operational Improvements 25Maintenance Regime – Litter and Graffiti 25Personal Safety and Security 26Nameplates and direction signing 26Surfacing 26Overhanging Vegetation 27Dropped kerbs 27Barriers 28

Footpaths through car parking areas 28

Permissive Paths 29

“Private” Paths 30

Other Links 30

4 A STRATEGIC WALKING NETWORK IN POOLE 31

The strategic walking network 31Figure 4.1 The Strategic Walking Network and Rotary Walk around Poole “Walk the Five Quays” 32

Missing links 35The regeneration areas 35Other links 37

5 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE 39

An action plan to promote walking in Poole 39

APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT SURVEY AND DATABASE OF RESULTS 42

The Survey 42

The Data Collected 42Figure A1 – Survey Form 43

The Results Database 44Figure A 2 – Sheet Results 46Figure A 3 – Sheet ResultsSpecial 47



SUMMARY

1. Poole Old Town and much of the town centre sits on a promontory in the harbour surrounded by water on three sides. Access to it by road from the east is via several roads running north east – south west. Running in the opposite direction across the promontory, linking the roads, are many public rights of way; footpaths and alleys that provide for movement on foot, as they have for centuries. Poole is so walkable today, in large part, because it has so many rights of way (ROW).

2. The ROW are distinct from the footways along the side of roads which are part of the highway and protected as such. People’s use of a right of way, over time, gives it its status; they are just local paths and have no statutory protection unless formally registered in a Definitive Map. None of the ROW in central Poole are registered today.

3. There were once many more ROW in the promontory, before the agglomeration of land for modern developments. While the loss of these paths has reduced the scope of the walking network in the promontory it is still inherently easy and convenient to get about on foot if you know the area.

4. Beyond the Old Town, in recent times, many more ROW were added in the new housing developments at Harbourside/ Baiter Park. These and yet more, recently built in the Poole Quarter, provide similarly for excellent access to the housing estates and movement around the town on foot.

The Condition Survey

5. The Rotary Club of Poole Bay conducted the condition survey, summarised in this report, so that the ROW will be registered. The survey is the first step in the Borough of Poole’s creation of a Definitive Map for the area, which will provide the rights of way with the protection they deserve

6. A project team of four surveyors completed the survey, involving at least three visits to each path over three months early in 2011. We are very grateful to Sue Bellamy and John Biggs of Poole Old Town Conservation Group and Poole and East Dorset Arts Society respectively, for their assistance in carrying out the survey.

7. The database of the survey information was developed, populated and handed over to the Council by the Rotary Club. The club also assisted with the subsequent digital mapping of the rights of way by the Borough of Poole Council. The database comprises detailed information on all of the paths, together with over 600 photographs.

The condition of the public rights of way

8. In general terms the 185 rights of way are in good condition. People treat them well. Most are in a good state of repair and while litter was found in 42, the worst excesses were found only after a holiday weekend. Graffiti was found in 21 of them, and dog mess in just 4; proof positive, if it were needed, that people do care for their local area and that the ROW are generally well maintained by the Council.

9. Another very positive finding of the condition survey was that the rights of way felt safe to the surveyors when using nearly all of them (172). They also found it was a pleasant experience to walk four out of every five of them (148).



10. Thus there are some ROW where the surveyors felt less safe and/ or found them unpleasant. The offending ones were older ones, some with blind bends in them and others in a relatively poor condition. Sadly, these tend to be in the busier public areas in Old Town or running off of the High Street, just the places where the best should be in evidence. Action is needed in the short run to improve this condition where possible.

11. Some localised problems were identified but these were few and far between. In some places there was vegetation from neighbouring properties either growing in or on, or overhanging the path; damage to the surface of the path; or blockage of the path by parked vehicles and/or unloading. Some difficulties for pedestrians are identified where paths cross car parks, some of them busy, and there is a general lack of direction signs and name plates which seems a pity.

12. Many of the ROW in Old Town have an historical significance. Together with surrounding buildings they reflect Poole’s history, particularly those running off of the Quay and the High Street and others linking important buildings and places. More might be done to draw this to visitors’ attention; Poole Museum’s planned heritage signing project is expected to fulfil this need.

13. Most of the paths were seen during several survey visits to have people using them and the waterside paths and several others of strategic importance are especially busy. More use of many could be encouraged to good advantage, were they to be promoted more obviously as a part of a walking network.

The scope for improvements to the Rights of Way

14. Some of the difficulties identified could be resolved by relatively minor physical improvements and work with property owners and tenants. Several suggestions are made in the report as illustrations of the sort of attention that is needed.

15. The best single illustration, one of many such possibilities, and well known locally, is Bell Lane off of the lower High Street, where Henry the lost dog guards the right of way. Henry is a lonely redeeming feature of this historic footpath link. The graffiti daubed on the rear doors of one of the shops has been there since 2010; weeds are ever present in the badly broken paving; the damaged metal sewer covers; extensive overhead wiring; packed off-street car parking hard against the path; and lack of any direction signs, all combine to make this useful ROW a no go area for some people.

16. Poole could surely do better in such an important area of the town. Might some joint working between landlords, tenants, community organisations and the Council be a good start with a view to finding an agreement on how it might be improved?

17. The database of information we have handed over to the Council on the results of the condition survey comprises the details of each and every one of the ROW together with over 600 photographs. This provides a very good basis for an improvement programme to be progressed as and when possible.

18. This programme of physical improvements of some ROW should extend to more general improvements such as signs and name plates, dropped kerbs and pedestrian safety features. Improvements in the maintenance regime, including litter and graffiti removal, are also suggested.

A walking network for Poole



19. A good case is made in the report for the Council to identify a strategic walking network in Poole, to promote it and to use it to prioritise improvement programme activity. We have shown our ideas in a map of the network and improvements designed to encourage more people to walk for pleasure and in making local trips.

20. It will be important to strengthen and improve the footways across the promontory over time in line with the strategic walking network, in order to encourage more walking. The three axes comprising Thames Street - Barbers Piles – Dee Way; Old and New Orchard Roads – Marston Road - Whittles Way; and Perry Gardens - South Road, Lagland Street - to Holes Bay are the ones we believe to be most useful in this regard. A second spine route within the promontory is also identified as an alternative to the High Street.

21. A few “missing links” have been identified in the network, together with some potential new rights of way or permissive paths, if the latter can be negotiated with private landowners. In particular we think that one missing link along the railway line linking the High Street with Walking Field Lane would be a very useful addition. Similarly, running in parallel on the south side of the railway line, the key links between Poole Quarter and High Street should also be declared ROW.

22. We also propose a round Poole walk and would like to see it progressed in the short run. We would like it to become “the Rotary walk of Poole” marketed under the banner of “Walk the Five Quays”. It would quickly become a visitor attraction as well as encouraging more local walking in the area. It is possible to walk it today using good footpaths and rights of way and it would be possible to establish it now; in time it will feature even more waterside walkways as the new developments are progressed.

Regeneration and redevelopment issues

23. The several sites due for redevelopment on either side of the Backwater Channel and the new Twin Sails Bridge imply new pedestrian desire lines and increased footfall between Hamworthy and the new development in Old Town, and the High Street. Pedestrians can be encouraged to explore this area because of its historical interest, the relatively close proximity of lots of different attractions, and the flat terrain. Walking is certainly to be encouraged, but for more people to do it, good safe walking is essential.

24. Whereas there were once good pedestrian links along this desire line, offering several different alternative walk routes, many of those that existed between West Quay Road and West Street were lost in the last century. Some of these now need to be put back if walking is to be encouraged as a means of getting around in the area.

25. The proposed Marston Road provides one additional link and this we see to be part of the strategic walking network. Another might be put back along the line of the earlier ROW linking the two roads via the derelict land on the west side of and next to the Westover Group showrooms, said to be in the ownership of the Council. Other key links include the existing pavements and paths at Bay Hog Lane and Barbers Piles. Good safe pedestrian crossings of the busy roads will also be absolutely essential for safe crossing of the proposed gyratory and at signalised junctions.

Next Steps

26. This report marks the end of the first year of our project. In the second year we are working with community interests and businesses to try to see some projects



progressed to highlight and celebrate the existence of the rights of way. The idea is to challenge and change some negative popular perceptions.

27. We will promote the findings of the condition survey and the conclusions of our work and hope to see some of the ideas progressed. We look forward to the active engagement of the Council and particularly to their work on the Definitive Map.

28. People have been very positive towards our project and have come up with several ideas for projects that are already being worked up. At the recent Georgian Fair in Old Town people told us that they thought that the pedestrian map and the Five Quay Walk were the best ideas to progress.

29. We see three critical requirements that arise from our survey of the condition of the rights of way:

the creation of a strategic walking network with action to improve the pedestrian environment;

a detailed walking map for pedestrians in central Poole, incorporating the rights of way; and

a better maintenance and cleaning regime to secure a suitable condition of the rights of way at all times.

30. In particular we would also like to discuss how we might help the Council to create and promote our suggested Rotary round walk of Poole – let’s “Walk the Five Quays”.



1. INTRODUCTION

Background to the project

1.1 In 2010 the Rotary Club of Poole Bay decided to conduct a two year community engagement project to map and promote the rights of way of Old Town, Poole. The objectives were developed in discussion with the Borough of Poole Council. They are: to facilitate the production, by the Council, of a Definitive Map of the rights of

way in the area, in order to secure statutory protection for the paths; and to improve the popular perception of the alleys and promote ways to

celebrate their heritage and value.1.2 During the first year of the project which began in July 2010, information about the

current condition of the rights of way (ROW) was collected and handed over to the Council for subsequent use in creating the Definitive Map. The second year of the project will involve further desk research into the history of some of the paths and the engagement of local interests to find ways in which the ROW might be “celebrated”. It is envisaged that projects will be carried out towards this end.

1.3 This report summarises the work undertaken and the findings of the condition survey, carried out in the Spring of 2011. It describes the current condition of the ROW throughout the area, identifies some key findings for consideration outlining issues arising from them, and provides some recommendations for future action. We are delighted to be on track with the project and to be able to deliver the survey as planned.

1.4 Two other projects involving the ROW are also happening currently, both with ambitions in the medium term. We are working closely with the two project teams concerned to ensure productive liaison and a coordinated outcome: The Bridging Communities team, who have drawn together the oral history of

Hamworthy and Old Town recently, want to see more information about some of the alleys of Old Town and their history displayed within some of the alleys; and

A Poole Museum Team is developing a signage project for the town, designed to inform people about local heritage at several key sites through information signs and better finger posting.

1.5 This project is part of Rotary Club of Poole Bay’s initiative to involve itself more actively in local affairs. During the first year the project team is pleased to have forged relationships with many local organisations and individuals, including two schools and the college, and three businesses, reporting on progress with the project to them at regular intervals. We look forward to engaging with some of them to take projects forward in the second year of the project.

1.6 We are really grateful for, and want to acknowledge, the considerable time contribution and help we have received in this first part of the project from Sue Bellamy of Poole Old Town Conservation Group and John Biggs of Poole and East Dorset Arts Society. Sue and John worked with us to design and carry out the condition surveys and to prepare this report.

1.7 During the survey we were invited to provide support towards a bid by Borough of Poole Council for Central Government funding from the Local Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF) possibly to improve some of the walking routes in the town. The work



would be as a part of a larger package of measures to be carried out over several years. We were pleased to be able to support the bid.

1.8 The very existence of the LSTF bidding process demonstrates the relevance of the project to current transport policy thinking for urban areas. The need to encourage more people to walk in making short journeys is now central to government policy to reduce car use in towns like Poole and to policies concerning public health.

1.9 We are delighted that the project is so relevant to government policy and so topical, and that it and others may attract government funding for further work. We have been asked also to outline our thinking on what needs doing to improve existing links and to develop new ones and the report also covers our thinking in this regard.

The Rights of Way (ROW) Survey

1.10 The area of the survey is shown in Figure 1.1 and includes all those paths identified and surveyed in the area bounded by the harbour between Poole Quay, West Quay, Lifeboat Quay, Holes Bay waterfront by Asda, across the Holes Bay Road, Poole railway station and Serpentine Road, the Towngate bridge, Kingland Road dual carriageway and two way road, Park Lake Road and the pedestrian underpass beneath the railway line, into Baiter Park by the bike track and back to the waterside along a raised path through trees to a point mid-way along the path between the river outlet from Poole Park into the harbour and the public slipway at Baiter and back along the harbourside walk to Poole Quay.

1.11 The ROW are paths quite distinct from the pavements alongside most roads in the area, which pedestrians also use. The distinction is an important one, as the highway (and its pavements) is already statutorily protected. The ROW, which in central Poole are not statutorily protected by dint of circumstance, but which clearly do warrant protection, are important depending upon their categorisation, as: important links between different parts of the town used by all sorts of

pedestrians, including locals and visitors on short and longer journeys; offering access to/ egress from particular localities, such as a housing estate, and

thus of most use to local people for short journeys. These are less relevant to people from other areas but none the less an important part of the public realm; and

providing access to the backs of properties in a Victorian terrace, for instance, for bins and back gates. Critical to the lives of just a few householders, these are less significant to the general public.

1.12 One or two of the paths surveyed are not technically rights of way but rather paths that people use today despite their not having a registered ROW status; for instance the route passing alongside the Sainsbury’s store between Newfoundland Drive and the front door of the store (1409) or the path from the railway station linking Serpentine Road and Falkland Square through the shopping development (1404).



Figure 1.1 The 185 surveyed paths



1.13 The ROW are thus of fundamental importance to some people’s lives and of some significance to the lives of most people living in the town and to visitors. There are only a very few of them that have little value to the general public.

1.14 The Definitive Map that the Borough of Poole Council intends to produce will concern all the ROW, so protecting their future, as such an important part of the public realm.

The Condition Survey and this Report

1.15 The survey work was undertaken across three months and included measurement of the length and width of the paths. Detailed observations were made of the many characteristics of each ROW and of the prevailing condition.

1.16 The survey results, together with photographs, for each ROW have been recorded in a spreadsheet database developed to store all of the information including the library of around 600 photographs. This was established specifically for the purposes of the Council in taking its work forward. Details of the database are provided in Technical Appendix A to this report.

1.17 This report provides a brief summary of the findings of the condition survey highlighting the main issues arising in Section 2. The actions necessary to deal with some of these issues are discussed in Section 3 and recommendations made concerning the future for the ROW. In Section 4 a strategic walking network that is seen to exist in Poole is described together with ideas on how this might be used to good effect and in Section 5 our next steps in this project are outlined together with a suggested plan for future action.

The importance of Poole’s pedestrian links (the ROW and pavements beside the roads)

1.18 The ROW in Old Town reflect the activities in the area, at the quay and throughout the town across history. The highways into and out of the area are aligned predominantly in a north east/ south west direction as they have done for centuries, linking the town with the sea and serving the various activities. They were important to the longer distance journeys involving the movement of goods into and out of the busy area from/ to Poole’s hinterland.

1.19 In Old Town, as is clear from earlier maps, the alleys and footpaths run predominantly at right angles to the highways, on a south east/ north west axis. They were and still are the essential cross-promontory routes, linking the different parts of the town.

1.20 Anyone who visits Poole and its Quay area today immediately sees pedestrians to be important to the vitality of the area’s economy. Pedestrians are everywhere: going about their day to day business locally; wandering perhaps as visitors interested in the many sights and attractions; or walking purely for pleasure, enjoying the ambience and the area’s many leisure and sporting facilities.

1.21 The central areas of Poole, including the shopping centre and Old Town area benefit from the town’s human scale – it is possible to walk to any part of the central area in a few minutes from any other location within the area. Similarly, from the central area it is possible to be enjoying any one of 5 different quays, Poole Park boating lake, beautiful waterside areas, and other attractions, all on-foot and within minutes.



Pedestrian Links and the Redevelopment Areas

1.22 This project is also timely and significant given the huge redevelopment and regeneration ambitions in Poole, particularly those in the Old Town area and on the Hamworthy bank of the Backwater Channel.

1.23 The large redevelopment sites will be significant attractors and will increase local movement both within the area itself and backwards and forwards via the existing and the new “twin-sails“ bridges. The pedestrian routes yet to be created as part of the new developments, their successful integration into today’s network and their associated elements of the public realm are of the utmost importance to the future of the Old Town, the High Street and their economic vitality.

1.24 This ROW condition survey and its findings highlight the most evidently important routes and potential pedestrian requirements for the future. This report outlines our appreciation of the possible changes in pattern of pedestrian use and demand for use in light of our experience in this project and for consideration in light of future proposed change.



2 THE CONDITION SURVEY AND FINDINGS

Introduction

2.1 The condition survey was undertaken on all ROW identified by the Ramblers Association in their 2004 survey and any other paths warranting consideration, either those developed since that date or other paths identified seeming possibly to warrant such a status.

2.2 The survey form was designed with the involvement of Borough of Poole Council and the base document is enclosed at Appendix A. The survey consisted of a series of questions requiring answers resulting in 71 discrete items of data and photographs of different aspects for each ROW. Survey questions included details of: The length and width of each right of way; Surface type and condition, details of any damage, growth or

overhanging vegetation, problems after rain etc; Name plates, plaques or signs and finger posts; The proximity of the path to the nearest bus stop; Barriers within the length of the ROW and their type; The presence or otherwise of dropped kerbs at entry/ exit; Ways in which the user experience might be improved; Public lighting, and its condition; Any evident problems - dog mess, smells, litter or graffiti; The ambience of the path – does the user feels safe in using it, would

they use it again if there were to be an alternative? The use of the path while being surveyed, on three or four separate

occasions.2.3 Surveys began in March 2011 and were largely completed by the end of

May 2011. Each ROW was visited by an individual or a pair of surveyors separately to measure its dimensions and use, and on at least three further occasions to collect the remaining data. Attempts were made to visit at different times of day and week, following rain and at night time.

2.4 The survey findings were entered into the spreadsheet database. Technical Appendix A to this report provides information about the database, its functionality and the photographic display. The database holds upwards of 20,000 records.

2.5 The following summary derives from an interrogation of the information on the ROW and provides an overview of their prevailing condition.

2.6 In all 185 ROW were identified and surveyed as shown in Figure 1.1. The Ramblers Association identified 175 ROW in 2004, of which one has been lost since then: 1070, Wilkins Way, which was taken over as a part of the accommodation works for the Twin Sails Bridge in December 2010. An additional 10 potential ROW were identified and surveyed in this project. Several other potential ROW exist in the area of Poole Quarter, which is yet to appear fully in the Ordnance Survey maps of the area.

Summary of Findings



General ambience

2.7 The survey revealed a very positive overall picture of the experience of using the ROW. Our surveyors felt safe in walking most of the ROW and that it was generally a pleasant experience. They would generally choose to use the path even if there were an alternative route: Do you feel safe using the path? – Yes: 172, 94%; No: 11, 6%; Is using the path a pleasant experience? – Yes:146, 80%; No: 37, 20%; Would you choose to use the path if there were an alternative? – Yes:

154, 84%; No: 29, 16%. 2.8 There was also a generally high standard of cleanliness and condition of

the ROW across the area. There is little litter to be found except in busier areas and very little evidence of dog mess anywhere to be found. There is some graffiti to be seen, but not much, and this is to be found predominantly in the busier central area in ROW that are less frequented or where there is some evidence of congregation; Litter was found in 42 ROW - 23% Dog-mess was found in just 4 ROW – 2% Graffiti in 21 of the ROW – 11%

2.9 There was a variability to the litter problem, dependent upon the proximity of survey visits to holiday periods and, presumably, street cleaning routines. It was disappointing to find that the problems were mostly to be found in Old Town itself, off of the High Street, and in Baiter Park leisure areas. The most litter was seen across the Easter holiday period, when some of it, including faeces in one alley off of the quay, was present for several days.

2.10 Graffiti was found in prominent places such as Sarum Street, adjacent to Scaplens Court (1079) and in Thames Mews adjacent to Cranberries Bistro (1080) and in several of the Quayside alleys (1086, 1087,1088,1089,1090 and 1091). Otherwise it was found mostly in less well used ROW, particularly in alleys and lanes off of the High Street such as Bell Lane(1094), Prosperous Street (1105), Westons Lane (1106), the un-named very narrow one adjacent to 121 High Street and linking to Lagland Street (1114), Globe Lane (1224). This consisted of graffiti images in evidence in most cases throughout the period of the survey, suggesting an irregular attention to the problem. In some places the graffiti was on walls and on doors, presumably private not public property, and in others it was on such as street signs and the like.

2.11 The evidence of this condition survey completely dispels the popular impression that dog mess is a problem on ROW, at least for central Poole. This surely is a good news story that deserves to be told. Clearly there has been a considerable social change in recent times and dog owners here do pick it up and dispose of it appropriately!

Perceptions of personal security and safety

2.12 Only a few of the rights of way were registered by our surveyors as being places that were unpleasant and unsafe and to be avoided. Some such



were behind terraces of older properties and purely for householders to use the rear of their properties, the other more public ones were as follows: 1090 – On the Quay between Poole Arms and Enefco House – an alley

with a distinct bend in it; users cannot see right along it. 1222 – Between Dear Hay Lane and Hill Street running alongside the

multi-storey car park. 1226/1227 – Running between the Sainsburys superstore forecourt and

Lagland Street and Newfoundland Drive respectively; the first being a loading bay often with parked cars, the second traversing a car park.

2.13 Several others were registered by our surveyors as being unpleasant or unsafe places and to be avoided: 1083 - linking Cinnamon Lane with 1081 and Church Street, a path that

is unclear, traverses a car parking area and has a bend in it. Several alleys and lanes off of the High Street

1093 Bell Lane 1094 Dennet’s Lane 1114 unnamed, links Lagland Street and 121 High Street and is

very narrow throughout its length; and 1224 Globe Lane

1109 - Drakes Court, off Old Orchard 1210 - between West Quay Road and West Street at Hungerhill end 1231 - Underpass linking rail station main entrance to Vanguard Rd. 1232 - Path beside Towngate Bridge linking Vanguard Road and North

Street, running along and beneath the dual carriageway.2.14 Just a few others were recorded as fitting one or other of the three

“unpleasant”, “unsafe” or “to be avoided” descriptions: The two slipways off of West Quay Road at 1069 Dee Way and 1208

Whittles Way, which tend generally to be deserted and to have parked vehicles on them;

1082 - next door to the Antelope Hotel and leading off of the High Street into Cinnamon Lane;

1074 - St Clement’s Lane linking the quay to Thames Street and having a sharp bend in the middle of the alley;

1089 - Hosiers Alley off of the Quay to the west of the Poole Arms; 1229 – an alley between houses on Green Road opposite the Old Town

First School and leading to a back lane. 2.15 There are some common characteristics linking several of these:

some are not overlooked and/or have bends and high walls in them, meaning that the user cannot be seen by others and/or cannot see right along the length of the ROW on entry to the path;

most of them are not busy and have few if any other activities going on at locations within them, thereby reinforcing perceptions of solitude and implied threat to the personal security of the user.

Specific Issues

2.16 The survey identified the prevailing position on several specific issues.



These included: signs and plaques referencing the ROW; the surfacing of the paths; public lighting; barriers; overhanging vegetation; the historic significance of the ROW; and the proximity to bus routes.

Signposting

2.17 Just 15 (8%) of ROW have fingerposts today and 35 (19 %) have plaques or other nameplates. This seems surprising, particularly in the Old Town area and given the significance of many of the Alleys as historic reference points. The position perhaps simply reflects the fact that the paths are not mapped or referenced for any purpose today.

Surfacing

2.18 Most of the paths are tarmac - 129 (70%), and in a good condition; 47 of them are paved, (26%); 12 are gravel (7%) and 4 are cobbled (2%). Some paths have two or more different surfaces along their length. Other materials found include stretches of brickwork, concrete, Purbeck stone and grass.

2.19 In general terms the ROW are well maintained although a few, 51 (28%) do exhibit some maintenance requirements such as unwarranted growth within the path surface or damage to the surface.

2.20 Some paths on Baiter Park are coarse gravel, appropriate to the area and running through grassland. Some of the more established areas around Lagland Street are concrete paths. Paving features in Old Town area more than elsewhere and is of variable quality and condition though generally good.

Lighting

2.21 Many of the ROW have public street lights that are provided by the Council – 125 (68%). In some of the newer developments such as alongside Aqua House on Lifeboat Quay the lighting is provided by the property owner. Elsewhere there is no lighting provided on some ROW, such as those in Baiter Park. In general terms the provision of lighting appears adequate.

Dropped Kerbs

2.22 Dropped kerbs exist at both ends of 82 (45%) of the ROW. A further 27 paths have them at one end only. These allow wheelchair and mobility scooter users the opportunity of easier access when using the ROW. In several areas dropped kerbs are not needed since many of the more modern paths, particularly those in the Harbourside/ Baiter Park residential areas generally intersect at the same level.

Barriers on the ROW

2.23 Barriers are to be found on 27 ROW (11%); these presumably exist to stop or slow cyclists or prevent use by other vehicles. Of these 37 (75%) were easily passable for wheel chair or mobility scooter users and mothers with baby buggies, but 12 were not.



2.24 Some paths have more than one set of barriers and different types. Generally the barriers are bollards - 35; there are some gates – 10, and a few staggered barriers - 6.

2.25 The majority of paths 127, (69%), were found to be wide enough for pedestrians and cyclists safely to pass one another.

Overhanging vegetation

2.26 Overhanging vegetation was not a major issue at the time of survey although it was found to exist in 48 (26%) of the ROW. In some places low hanging trees or vegetation from within properties along the path showed some likelihood of becoming a problem, reducing the passing width of a path or implying difficulties in wet or windy weather. In a few places trees had become so large and dense that the path is dark and lighting ineffective.

ROW of historic interest

2.27 Those identified in the survey and considered to be of historical significance include most of the ROW in Old Town, most of those leading to and from the High Street between North Street and the Quay, those in Baiter Park leisure areas and a few others around the Towngate area.

Bus Stops and Routes

2.28 There are bus stops nearby to 62 (34%) of ROW and in most cases there are raised kerbs to help people to get on or off the bus more easily – 49 (75%) of the paths with a bus stop. There is less likely to be a shelter - 31 (50%), or a seat at the stop - 26 (42%).

2.29 Bus Route 1 runs around much of the area offering residents and visitors the opportunity to use it for local trips. There are a few other routes that pass along one or other roads in the vicinity of some ROW that are publicised in the supporting bus guides.

Permissive paths

2.30 There are two so-called “permissive” or “permitted” paths in the area. These are signed as such by their permission givers and apparently only “rights of way” according to stated conditions set by those granting the permission and concerning the rights of users. These paths have obvious utility to those who use them today, and some evident potential in so far as the strategic network of paths throughout the area is concerned. These are relevant in the context of the changes going on in the area.

1405 – Running between RNLI and ASDA developments, between West Quay Road and the Asda car park. This is used today by pedestrians for access to the ASDA shop, and by some for access to the lifeboat quay area. The path itself does not extend as an ROW to either of these locations.

1406 - Running through the Barbers Gate area with an open gate at the Quay end and an electronically controlled gate at the St James Church/ Thames Street end. This was reported to us by a resident as



a bone of contention to some of those living in the development. Apparently it is used by cyclists frequently, despite the narrowness of a pinch point mid-way along the path and its use by other pedestrians.

“Private” paths

2.31 There are several ROW identified as such in the Ramblers Association survey of 2004 where today signs are erected prominently to proclaim the paths to be private. Pedestrians are thus warned off from using them and their status is unclear.

Paths/ ROW having little purpose for the general public

2.32 There are several ROW identified that have no evident utility as far as the general public use is concerned. These include 1084, 1085, 1110, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1137, 1161, 1218, 1221, – in most cases these merely provide access to the backs of properties facing onto the road and are thus important to the householders concerned for rear access and bins.

Paths that cross car parks with no clear path or protection

2.33 It is potentially difficult and sometimes poor practice to have ROW crossing areas of multi-functional use – such as parking areas and/ or loading/ unloading areas. There are several such ROW today, including 1079, 1083, 1105, 1220, 1226, 1227, 1234 and 1235.

2.34 In the case of 1226, for part of its length a shared space often with loading and unloading to a pub/ restaurant and regular parking as well as the well used ROW, people are sometimes prevented from using the path. A local resident dependent on a mobility scooter reported they were regularly unable to use the ROW to access the Sainsbury’s store.

2.35 Some of these examples do not represent much of a problem and perhaps do not warrant any change to current arrangements, but, where pedestrian safety is compromised it is appropriate to review and improve them.

Pedestrian use of the ROW

2.36 The measurements of use made by our surveyors on their several visits to each ROW are reinforced by this overview of use across the network developed during the survey while walking the entire area several times. It is evident that when considering use of the ROW there is a hierarchy of ROW today by virtue of their differing levels of use.

2.37 Some of the ROW especially those providing strategic links such as those along the waterside through Baiter and towards the quays (1142, 1143, 1146): South Road by the Old Town First School (1118); between the railway station and Falkland Square (1404) and through the shopping centre (1237); and between the bus station and the swimming pool area (1242) can be very busy and feature all types of pedestrian users. Some of the well used ones provide links that office workers use to pop into town at lunch times such as 1211 1212 and 1215 linking the RNLI area to the High Street areas and others in the vicinity provide a connection to



the Asda store from the town centre area 1326, 1210, and 1223.2.38 Others such as those in the Old Town conservation area, those leading off

of the Quay and those in other visitor locations are less busy than might be expected, other than at times of specific events or at holiday periods. Some of those serving the High Street itself also fall into this less well used category, linking residential areas and parking areas to the High Street, such as 1124 Globe Lane, 1106 Westons Lane, 1105 Prosperous Street, 1102/1103 Bowling Green Lane. Spine routes in the newer housing areas are also in this category, being well used at some times of the day and by several people at the same time. These include 1157 and 1192 in the Harbourside/ Baiter Park development providing direct access to all parts of the estate.

2.39 Other paths in the ROW network are quieter still, including all of the paths that link smaller areas of housing in the estates and of interest only to those people living in the immediate vicinity. One or two – for example those linking the water of Holes Bay to the highway network: 1069 Dee Way, 1208 Whittles Way and 1209 the slip way by the RNLI, all attract less interest for pedestrians other than slip way users.

2.40 Only a few paths are hardly used at all and these are generally of fundamental importance to householders living along their length.



3 KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

3.1 In general the ROW are in good shape but that does not mean that some could not be improved to good advantage. Some physical and some systemic improvements suggested themselves to us and these are reported here together with a set of recommendations suggested for action.

3.2 There are many issues concerning the physical condition of the ROW and their management regime. We identify and recommend several actions all with a view to encouraging an improvement to the experience of people using them, concerning:

physical improvements to the ROW themselves, illustrating our thinking through several particular examples; and

changes to the operational regime governing their upkeep and day to day appearance.

3.3 Clearly not all the problems identified are the responsibility of the Council. Landlords, property tenants and local residents/ community associations have some responsibilities too.

3.4 Is a closer involvement of community organisations and local people perhaps an appropriate way forward in keeping the ROW to a high quality condition? We found an interest amongst a few people we have spoken to; one stating a willingness to volunteer to help in practical ways as a guardian to a specific path.

Improvements to the current condition of ROW

3.5 The ROW in Old Town reflect Poole’s ancient history. As a very important part of the public realm they also represent its current ambience as a pleasant place to visit and enjoy. Sadly, some need improvement and some others are rather sterile places with little going on to attract people to make use of them, other than as part of longer journeys.

3.6 This is also true elsewhere in the town, particularly along the pedestrianised parts of the High Street where some people find the ROW to be intimidating.

3.7 We note the Government’s relaxations in planning regulation and wonder if these offer potential for changes in use, say from office to residential, that might perhaps bring a different ambience in some of the locations identified

3.8 It is important that the Council shows by its efforts that it wants to encourage more walking; and it intends the ambience of ROW to be pleasing, as well as the experience of their use.

Recommendation: As a matter of policy the Borough of Poole Council should promote more walking. As part of this policy it should commit to improving, managing and maintaining walking routes throughout the area to a high standard.



Physical Improvements to the ROW

3.9 A few ROW are scruffy and down at heel, or unpleasant places to be. Some of them need a facelift, as a minimum, and perhaps some more tangible improvements. A demonstration of intent might be to begin to design suitable improvements with community assistance, with a view to bringing forward real schemes in due course.

Recommendation: Introduce a programme of improvement for specific enhancements of ROW in the walking network, according to evident priorities and involving property owners local communities and other interests in planning and carrying out the changes.

3.10 Some specific suggestions for improvement, to illustrate this possibility, include the following, but this is not an exhaustive list: 1094 Bell Lane off High Street – encourage property owners to

repaint external walls and doors; Council to remove weeds and see that this happens on a regular basis; replace broken drain covers; introduce a better litter removal cycle; facilitate an environmental improvement designed to make the alley look more interesting from either end.

1083 at the back of the Antelope hotel in Cinnamon Street linking through via 1084 to Church Street – clear delineation of ROW route as a pedestrian ROW is needed and a better ambience. This suggests at least a clearly marked walkway on which it would be unacceptable or illegal to park and an appropriate environmental treatment;

1090, 1091 – Quayside alleys – these and others along the Quay feel oppressive to some people at most times of the day, especially 1090, which has a bend in it preventing through sight from either end. The planning policy to support the introduction of business activities along the length of these alleys and opening onto them might attract more footfall and more use would make them less threatening to use. Some stimulus seems necessary to encourage property owners to see this to be a profitable thing to do. The history of some of the buildings in the alleys and of the alleys themselves is intriguing and heritage signage, finger posts and attractions illustrating the history of the area through some of these buildings might also increasing the vitality of the area.

1224 Globe Lane, 1104 Carters Lane – the two long blank brick walls of Globe Lane and to a lesser extent Carter’s Lane create an oppressive feel, are uninteresting and attract graffiti. Find ways to change the feel of the Lane with planting or some such means of changing the nature and feel of them.

1114 – Lagland Street to High Street – this very narrow lane is well used but threatening to many people because of its narrowness, high walls and an entrance set back into the wall of 121 High Street where there is evidently some congregation at times and which cannot be seen from either end of the path. Action to reduce the height of the wall at the rear of the car park behind 117 High Street and to gate off the side entrance to 121, so the congregation cannot occur without clearly being seen by users of the path, would help. A stated policy intent to reduce the chasm-like atmosphere upon possible future development of sites either side, would be useful.



1102/3 Bowling Green Alley – this historically interesting pair of alleys is well used, linking a public car park to the High Street but attracts misuse at night, attracts graffiti and requires daily cleaning. There are several properties – flats and workshop opening onto the alley some of which are inhabited and others that are not. Some of the property bounding the alley seems in a poor state of repair and this perhaps makes more likely the disrespect shown by graffiti and misuse. It would help if some of these buildings were seen to be in regular use and in a better state of repair. Is there scope for a partnership between Council, landlords and community venture to secure these sorts of improvements?

3.11 A few ROW, Key Lane, Paradise Street and St Clements Lane, are spoiled by the presence of large refuse wheelie bins.

Recommendation: Take steps to remove or hide refuse bins from the alleys and ensure future development proposals deal with refuse within their sites.

Operational Improvements

Maintenance Regime – Litter and Graffiti

3.12 It was evident from our survey that the litter built up over a holiday period, detracting from the ambience of the area. It is at holiday times when many people experience the more historic areas and the alleys. Clearly that is just when it is most important for them to be in their best condition. We do particularly note that in general people are very careful today not to litter or to allow their dogs to mess up the ROW but nevertheless an improved litter/cleaning regime is necessary at the busiest times.

Recommendation: Ensure that the maintenance regime secures a good quality experience for users at all times.

3.13 A telephone report hot-line exists on the Borough of Poole website and some attention clearly is paid to the reported problem of graffiti. Nevertheless some was found in 21 ROW and the problem warrants more urgent attention than was the case during the survey. We wonder if more active promotion of the hot-line is needed say, by highlighting its existence on car parking tickets or bus tickets, for example.

3.14 Presumably the problem goes beyond the remit of the Council in that some of the graffiti appears on private property. Irrespective of this possible difficulty a way needs to be found by which the problem can be effectively dealt with no matter where it is found. Regular removal is appropriate where there is recurrence. The presence of graffiti merely serves to reinforce popular perceptions that ROW exhibiting it are not places to go, being potentially threatening or hostile places.

3.15 Where action does not cover up or remove the images totally it leaves an unwarranted down-market feel to the ROW. Simply attempting to remove the graffiti is not enough; an example is the pedestrian subway on ROW 1242, between the bus station and the swimming pool, where it is evident at all times that an attempt has been made simply to paint out the graffiti on the walls. Nothing short of a wholesale repaint or re-tiling of the



subway walls is likely to bring the feel of the place back to the quality standard required.

Recommendation: Ensure more active promotion of the Graffiti telephone hot-line and the regular removal of graffiti, if necessary developing better working arrangements with landlords and tenants of private properties in susceptible locations, to see that any graffiti is removed as soon after appearance as possible.

Personal Safety and Security

3.16 Some alleys are distinctly uninviting or intimidating, especially at night. Our surveyors were invited to comment on the ones they would avoid if there were an alternative and came up with the 18 ROW in paragraphs 2.12 to 2.14 inclusive, which should be improved, with people’s perceptions of their personal security and the change needed for them to feel safer at the forefront of the design process.

Recommendation: Take steps to improve the reported intimidating ROW and ensure that all paths in future are overlooked by windows in flanking property, do not have blind bends or contain potential hiding places and are well lit at night.

Nameplates and direction signing

3.17 Today just 27% of the paths are prominently named by a street sign or plaque or have a finger post directing pedestrians. In the context of encouraging more use of some of them more signage is entirely appropriate.

Recommendation: All of the rights of way in the historic areas of the town, and on the strategic network of walking routes should be named prominently at either end of the path.

Increase the legibility of the walking routes in the Town through much improved direction finger posting.

Ensure the names of ROW are much more evident in local maps; particularly in a more detailed pedestrian map of the area.

Surfacing

3.18 By and large the surface condition of the ROW is good; just a few needing urgent attention. Tarmac ones with damage to or growth through the tarmac tend to be in the newer developments and in places most exposed to sea air and weather. Others might be as a result of work on the path by the utilities and poor repair. Yet more are simply more to do with age.

Recommendation: Ensure that the maintenance and improvement programme recognises the historic value of specific alleys (Bowling Green Alley, quayside alleys) and utilises the appropriate surface and drainage materials, matching original materials where feasible and replacing historically correct



materials where possible.

Overhanging Vegetation

3.19 A few of the ROW in the Old Town and Town Centre are poorly maintained– some of these are evidently the responsibility of neighbouring property landlords and not in the Council’s domain. We assume there probably is already a mechanism to encourage improvement that involves Council, local community, landlords and tenants, but is it working and could it be used more to keep the ROW in better shape?

3.20 Some ROW in the newer development areas such as Harbourside Park rely on the residents of properties abutting them to keep weeds and garden plants from incursion onto the paths or overhanging them. Again this is an area warranting joint action on the part of the set of interests to be involved – Council, community, individuals as landlords or tenants

3.21 Where there are problems it is clear that some warrant early attention by the Council. Others require more regular and cyclical attention, tending to change with the seasons. The responsibility for these varies between the Council and the landlord or tenant. In most cases, but for a very few locations, it was clear that these responsibilities are being taken seriously.

Recommendation: Take steps to enforce adjoining owners to maintain their vegetation if overhanging the footpath where necessary.

3.22 Others such as 1094, Bell Lane, exhibit weed growth all year round within the path itself or at its boundary with the buildings. This problem is more in the domain of the Council and warrants closer attention. Particularly in such a sensitive part of the area.

Recommendation: Ensure the programme of maintenance includes at least annual removal of surface vegetation

Dropped kerbs

3.23 There are many ROW where dropped kerbs exist already or where they are in close proximity to the end of the path. There are many others that interlink with other paths on the same level.

3.24 In general terms it is appropriate that those in the busiest areas should have dropped kerbs because of the level of use – in our view the priorities are those along the High Street, in Old Town, on the strategic routes and the spine/ busier routes leading into /out of the housing estates.

Recommendation: Introduce a programme to ensure dropped kerbs are provided where necessary, especially in High St, Old Town and on the strategic network.

Barriers

3.25 Some ROW today have barriers placed evidently to prevent passage by



bicycles or skateboards some in locations where there are more likely to be elderly people walking. Others have these to prevent entry by motorised vehicles or car parking. Yet more have them where there is likely to be a presence of bicycles and in locations where it would be inappropriate for them to be used.

3.26 The need for access for people in wheelchairs; for mothers with children’s buggies and for people on motorised scooters, demands that the barriers do accommodate such movement.

Recommendation: Install barriers only when absolutely necessary and remove or adapt them where they interfere with movement of wheelchairs, buggies etc

Footpaths through car parking areas

3.27 The following ROW cross parking areas of one sort or another and some warrant improvement:

1083 provides the pedestrian link from Cinnamon Lane to 1081 and Market Street. However from Cinnamon Lane it is first necessary to cross a car parking area, with signs on the wall saying “private” before turning into the paved part of the ROW. There is generally a parked car blocking the path alongside the fence line and confounding the unknowing pedestrian.

Recommendation: The footpath over the car park should at least be clearly marked and have a fingerpost at either end to assure pedestrians of its utility. Parking should not be allowed on the footpath.

1105 – the alley linking what is now Prosperous Street to the High Street used to be named Prosperous Street, it is now unnamed. Along the west side there is a new housing development with several properties fronting immediately onto the ROW, and on the other side there are several short-term parking bays abutting the path and requiring drivers to enter into and use the path for part of its length for manoeuvring and parking purposes, doing so on the ROW. While we saw no evidence of difficulty with this, the arrangement is an unfortunate compromise.

Recommendation: Distinguish the ROW footway for pedestrians that is safe from manoeuvring vehicles and make it very evident to drivers.

1220 off of Market Close runs along the length of facing garage properties in the car turning area. There are safe pavements within metres for making the same movement along a different route, with minimal diversion.

Recommendation: Declare the existing ROW redundant and direct to alternative paths



1226 between Lagland Street and the Sainsbury’s store front is a mixed use short section of route often compromised as far as pedestrians are concerned by unloading and parked vehicles. We note that the surface has been improved recently

Recommendation: Take steps to clarify the right of way for pedestrians and possibly restrict other users.

1227 runs from 1226 to the pavement of Newfoundland Drive outside a back entrance to Sainsburys. Along its length it changes from a segregated footpath to cross a car park and passes though a parking space abutting the pavement at the Newfoundland Drive end. While this private car park is not in constant use, the lack of definition of where the ROW runs is an inadequacy. There is a parallel route that is not an ROW but which with Sainsbury’s agreement might become a permissive path running from the pedestrian entrance off of Newfoundland Road across their in-site pedestrian crossing and alongside the store on a footpath that is already there. (see paragraph 3.26 below)

Recommendation: Investigate the creation of an alternative permissive ROW alongside Sainsburys store; if not possible, then clarify the existence of the footpath across the car park of 1227

1234, 1235 – these paths encourage pedestrians to cross a working short term car park area in the ownership of the Borough of Poole Council in the area immediately to the rear of a busy part of the High Street pedestrian area. This seems to us to an example of poor practice, given the potential conflicts between drivers and pedestrians.

Recommendation: Clarify the footways, safe for pedestrians to use, in a way that is evident to all drivers.

Permissive Paths

3.28 Could this approach, to the creation and existence of pedestrian ways as ROW, be used more extensively in Poole? We think it might. Clearly it is a good way for businesses to demonstrate their commitment to the local community in a very positive fashion.

3.29 Permissive paths might be a solution to other possible ROW routes identified in this survey, such as 1409 alongside the Sainsbury’s store and within their site, 1404 between the rail station and Falkland Square, 1237 through the Dolphin shopping centre, and those within the Dolphin Quays development and the Thistle site, for instance? Caution needs to be exercised to prevent the privatisation of public space, a criticism of some concerning the impact of the new quayside developments, but nevertheless some benefits could be achieved through such a mechanism if carefully negotiated and established.

“Private” Paths



3.30 The status of these particular paths is unclear given their identification as ROW and yet the signs placed prominently proclaiming that they are private. Just what is the position as far as ordinary pedestrians are concerned? In light of the proposed redevelopment along the Backwater Channel, the likelihood of increasing footfall through the area and the future importance of all cross-promontory pedestrian links of which some of these are part, then clarity as to their current status is appropriate. 1083 – Cinnamon Lane to 1081, across car park area to Market

Street 1077 - Poplar Close 1096 to 1101 inclusive -St Aubyns Court

Other Links

3.31 Dolphin Quays and Thistle Hotel areas: Pedestrian links not identified specifically in this exercise, but perhaps warranting consideration for declaration as ROW, include those through the Dolphin Quays development and pedestrian desire lines through the Thistle development. In particular it seems incongruous in the context of local transport policy today that the housing areas immediately behind the Thistle development do not enjoy a right of way directly to the waterside that previously existed in this area and which could still exist with a minimum of accommodation work today.

Recommendation: Reinstate ROW between residential areas to the rear of Dolphin Quays and the Thistle Hotel directly linking them to the waterside.

3.32 Between Old Orchard and East Quay Road – 1408, once a highway this part of the network is now largely closed to motor traffic, through physical barriers at either end. We note that in the evenings some traffic can enter for parking purposes, but for most of the day its use is by pedestrians. Should this become an ROW?

3.33 Post Office Lane – we are advised that this lane linking High Street and Globe Lane was gated off at either end when the property next to it was a post office, albeit then a right of way. Could it now be reinstated as a ROW?



4 A STRATEGIC WALKING NETWORK IN POOLE

4.1 There is a strategic walking network in Poole and it might usefully be identified and promoted to highlight the town’s inherent walkability. A well publicised network comprising several pedestrian routes across and around the area would be well used if made more evident to people. This implies a readily available pedestrian map designed specifically for people walking around the area and better on-street signing.

4.2 A hierarchy of walking routes is envisaged. The paths of the strategic network would represent the most important routes; the priorities for improvement and maintained to the highest standards. They would be made more evident, through finger posts, street maps and visitor leaflets. Many ROW are integral to the network.

4.3 During the course of our work we have spoken to several departmental interests at the Council and note that different perspectives exist regarding mapping of this sort. It will be essential that the different interests are integrated in something so detailed as the pedestrian map, in order that it may be used in several different contexts yet represent a common perspective of the local opportunity to get around easily on foot.

The strategic walking network

4.4 Figure 4.1 identifies our recommendations for the strategic walking network including many of the ROW and footpaths alongside the road network. The map also highlights the potential that exists for the creation of a new Poole leisure walk “Walk the Five Quays”.

4.5 The map identifies some of the possible new ROW in the redevelopment areas; some “missing links” – potential additions to today’s network; and one or two other suggestions to add to the utility of the network. It also includes one or two ROW, already in existence, which as yet do not appear in any plans but warranting declaration as ROW. The missing links warrant early consideration for possible construction and identification as ROW, in light of the interest to encourage more walking in Poole.

4.6 The map comes from thinking about busier parts of today’s walking network and subsequent change after redevelopment. It illustrates why a map for pedestrians needs to be of at least this level of detail. At this scale all of the paths and rights of way can be shown. This is the minimum required for a legible and walkable town centre.

4.7 The highlighted routes are those to be prioritised for pedestrians to use for getting about the area and to be improved for their function as primary walking routes. The business of improving them might be used to stimulate the improvement of the public realm in key areas of the town; seized also as an opportunity to improve the overall prevailing ambience.



Figure 4.1 The Strategic Walking Network and Rotary Walk around Poole “Walk the Five Quays”



4.8 The paths will be characterised by a high environmental quality and features, such as: good quality surfacing; excellent signposting; on-street maps; all ROW named and signed; protected road crossings; dropped kerbs; litter bins; and seats in suitable locations.

Recommendation: Establish a programme of improvements to the highlighted pedestrian route network, and use it to improve the prevailing environmental condition of key locations.

Produce and publicise a map highlighting the walking network as part of the street map of the area, prominently displayed and readily available in hard copy at tourist information outlets.

4.9 The High Street pedestrianised areas provide an excellent walking spine through the shopping centre and into the promontory, linking to the Quay. There is another, largely traffic free walking route running more or less parallel to this which shows off more of th e exceptional built form of the town which might also be promoted to good advantage: namely, the Church Street, Market Street, Dear Hay Lane, Market Close, Nightingale Lane, Church Lane route

Recommendation: Define the Church Street, Market Street, Market Close axis as a second alternative largely traffic free route for pedestrians.

4.10 In keeping with the need for pedestrian paths across the promontory in a south-east/ north-west direction; three strategic walking routes are needed via three distinct axes.

Recommendation: Define three pedestrian cross-promontory routes:

Thames Street, Barber’s Piles and Dee Way;

The eastern sides of Old Orchard, New Orchard, the proposed Marston Road and Whittles Way, (once/ if the new link is created; if it is not created then make a new ROW along that line of route);

East Quay, Perry Gardens, Lagland Street, North Street and across the West Street and West Quay Road areas to Lifeboat Quay via the paths by Asda (This latter route links several existing protected pedestrian crossings over main roads and crosses over only lightly trafficked routes south of Lagland Street. It uses the very strong ROW 1118 alongside the First School and would require a pedestrian crossing on Ballard Road near the Old Lifeboat Station).

4.11 We also note the strong pedestrian axis on either side of the railway line connecting the east of the area with High Street and the Towngate area.

Recommendation: Strengthen walking routes along either side of the rail lines with two or three new links to be created as ROW.



Across the old Ladies Walking Field, within the bus parking area of the bus garage;

The already good links linking Poole Quarter with Sainsburys and the High Street to the south of the rail line.

Declare the link between Falkland Square and the Station an ROW

Create a walkway alongside the rail tracks immediately to the south of them linking Vanguard Road with the High Street.

4.12 Other ROW offer real scope to improve the local street scene and general ambience of different areas through an upgrade, were this to be designed with the improvement of the pedestrian experience in mind. Two excellent examples are the suggested strategic link in the area to the south of Lagland Street and another to the south west of the railway line linking the underpass from the Railway Station with the High Street via the pavement to the south of and below Towngate Bridge. There are potentially many other such possibilities all of which could be used additionally to significantly enhance local environments, but these two are good examples of the potential of such change to enhance the central areas of Poole quite easily:

The Old Lifeboat Station, Perry Gardens, South Road, Lagland Street walking route, comprises an already important and very well used ROW (1118) and is suggested to become a part of the strategic walking network. To improve the route, ideally it would be necessary to secure a protected pedestrian crossing of Ballard Road, in the vicinity of the life boat station, and Perry Gardens might be thoroughly remodelled as a shared space for pedestrians, cyclists and vehicular traffic, the latter being hardly present but for access to properties along the road given it is a no through route. By remodelling the route in the area of the Skinner Street crossing a more direct pedestrian way can be achieved and much better general ambience achieved through re-shaping green space and parking areas around the flats. Not only could a much better walking route be achieved but also some very positive cosmetic enhancements to the general ambience of the area as a whole to the significant benefit of local residents. These ideas lend themselves well to a community design exercise and community involvement in the changing of the pedestrian arrangements.

Today the route from the south western end of the pedestrian underpass from the railway station is via ROW 1232 alongside and beneath the Towngate Bridge. The presence and noise of the dual carriageway is overbearing and the route itself not very pleasant. An alternative exists, to walk around via Vanguard Road and through the short ROW 1233 to North Street and thence to the High Street areas but this road is little other than a no through way, loading, turning area with no raised footways. Were this alternative route for pedestrians to be properly designed and constructed and an environmental enhancement also to be carried out then the space



could be made much more attractive. It looks also to be feasible, to create a path alongside the rail line directly into the High Street from Vanguard Road via 154 High Street should the landowners agree to such a change, which would represent a further enhancement.

4.13 We also imagine the possibility of creating a longer distance walk around the whole area that we have considered in this project. The walk would show off the several faces of Poole often unseen by casual visitors to the town.

Recommendation: Promote a Rotary walk around Poole – “Walk the Five Quays” – literally following the waterside along the promontory for much of its length and taking in the shopping centre, Poole Park, Baiter Park and the Waterside right around to the rail station and the start.

(NOTE: This is, of course, physically possible today and the new developments once complete promise a much longer waterside walk in due course.)

Missing links

The regeneration areas

4.14 The regeneration area plans create rather larger parcels of land and a coarser grain in the new areas, as opposed to the fine grain of the built form in Old Town. They envisage a new waterside walkway through the area, alongside the Backwater Channel and appear to safeguard the pedestrian regime, which will be so important to the future vitality of the area. The granularity of the built form and the quality of the public domain are very important considerations concerning the future pedestrian routes.

4.15 Several paths warrant identification as ROW – some constructed since 2004 and others laid down as part of a planning process since that date. More arise as ambitions yet to be secured as a part of the regeneration planning process. These include:

Asda area and waterside on Lifeboat Quay – the RNLI permissive path (1405) provides an excellent link for pedestrians from West Quay Road for access to the area of the store and its car park. We think it might be extended to the waterside and to the front door of ASDA to good advantage. We have identified five new ROW in the area; one along the waterfront path on Lifeboat Quay (1400) and two short links to the back of Aqua house, one through the development by the fish bar (1402), the other alongside the RNLI fence line (1403); there is also a new one from corner door of Asda to the waterfront alongside the eastern end of Aqua House (1401). The other one (1326) forks off to the north east from the corner door of Asda to the waterfront , and also links this position to the pedestrian crossing on West Quay Road.

Recommendation: RNLI and Asda should be encouraged to allow the creation of ROW or permissive paths, one linking



the existing RNLI one (1405) to 1403, and the other linking it to the main front door of the Asda store.

Waterside walk from Poole Quay via Old Bridge to Whittles Way: One of the most important links between the existing and new areas will be a pedestrian crossing of the lifting bridge approach.

We assume that the waterside walk proposed along this section of the Backwater Channel will come within Part 9 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 thereby requiring Natural England to secure such access, but we also wonder if it needs ROW status. Additional requirements are as follows:

South of Twin Sails bridge – 1069 Dee Way ROW remains of critical importance as a direct link across the promontory extending the Thames Street, Barbers Piles pedestrian route; it is also essential that there is a safe pedestrian crossing of the new approach road to the “Twin Sails” bridge, which will follow the line of Wilkins Way, linking the two waterside walks as well as pavements on either side of the road allowing pedestrian movement back to West Quay Road.

North of Twin Sails bridge – it is essential that there will be some means of pedestrian return to West Quay Road both within the site (with an extension over West Quay Road and then to West Street- see below) and along the line of Whittles Way.

Recommendation: Take steps to secure an at grade pedestrian crossing over the approach road to the Twin Sails Bridge at the waterside and to secure an ROW allowing pedestrian movement from the waterside path to West Quay Road, at its easternmost extremity in any development requirement specifications.

Links between West Quay Road and West Street - With the redevelopment of both sides of the Backwater Channel there will be much increased pedestrian activity in the area. The new Twin Sails Bridge will create a totally new pedestrian desire line linking the properties and businesses on either bank with the High Street and Old Town areas. The earlier paths and alleys that existed between the two roads would be useful today. An ROW is needed to help pedestrians to cross the proposed one-way gyratory through land between West Quay Road and West Street. This will become especially desirable in short term if the new Marston Road and the proposed new gyratory are not built and the waterside area development is built.

Marston Road when built will create a pedestrian link at a strategically important point in the walking network. The old maps show an alley immediately to the west of the Queen Mary public house, lost in the last century with the redevelopment of West Quay Road.



Recommendation: Reinstate an ROW along the line of the earlier alley through the derelict site next to the Westover Group offices and showrooms, linking West Quay Road and West Street. Provide pedestrian crossings for safe movement across West Quay Road and West Street along this desire line.

New, already built pedestrian links from the Poole Quarter - There is a strong pedestrian axis running from the Poole Quarter, south of the railway line towards and across the Seldown Bridge and Pitwines Close and along Newfoundland Drive. There are already good pedestrian links within the Poole Quarter and between it and the High Street areas. Some are probably within the boundary of the highway and thus pavements, but others are not and warrant proper accreditation as ROW where appropriate. The links should be waymarked out to the east of the Poole Quarter too, as a part of the strategic walking network, linking into it in the vicinity of the Newfoundland Drive/ Catalina Drive roundabout.

Recommendation: Declare any appropriate paths, other than highways, within Poole Quarter and between it and High Street and running parallel to and south of the railway line, ROW.

Other links

4.16 There are two other existing pedestrian links that do not appear to have been identified as ROW, but which perhaps warrant consideration in this exercise and a third that is an ROW but only open during shopping hours: Between Poole Museum and Custom House – 1407 is effectively

a pedestrian area for part of the length of Paradise Street alongside the Customs House. While it may still be designated highway and thus not an ROW, it seem unlikely to be returned to highway status in the foreseeable future. Consideration should also be given to creating an ROW along the whole of the length of Paradise street and making the path clear so that parking and unloading does not compromise pedestrian movement.

Recommendation: Create an ROW along the length of Paradise Street and distinguish it from other permitted activities in the area of remaining highway.

Between the Railway Station and Falkland Square – It seems an anachronism that this route has not previously been identified as an ROW (1404). It is the primary entrance to the town for visitors on foot coming from the railway station. It makes for a very poor gateway to the town.

Recommendation: Declare the route within the shopping centre and Falkland Square linking the railway station to Falkland Square an ROW

Between Falkland Square and Kingland Road through the Dolphin Shopping Centre – this is perhaps Poole’s strongest, most historic pedestrian link of all (1237). This route passes along the line



of the High Street and is closed at night. In the context of Poole being a “walking town” this is an anomaly that perhaps warrants consideration to see whether it may be “re-opened” at some future date for use at all times.

Recommendation: Register an interest with the new owners of the shopping centre to see ROW 1237 open to use at all times.



5 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE

An action plan to promote walking in Poole

5.1 This condition survey provides the wherewithal for Borough of Poole Council to develop the definitive map of public rights of way in Old Town and wider area. This is the most important action we wish to see following our work.

5.2 Several other actions arise from the work. We recommend them to be taken forward by the Council and others, as appropriate: An overt policy to promote walking in Poole is desirable, backed up by:

A programme of physical improvements to some ROW so today’s poorest examples look and feel safer and more pleasant to use; and

A programme to provide name plates and direction signs, dropped kerbs, better bus stops, better pedestrian safety on ROW passing through car parks and changes to barriers on ROW as necessary;

A policy for future ROW of allowing no blind corners, ensuring overlooking developments and high quality public lighting where necessary;

A strategic walking network should be identified and used to promote walking in Poole and prioritise action to enhance ROW, this to include: Several discrete cross-promontory routes; A second through promontory route; alternative to the High

Street; More pedestrian routes either side of the railway line linking

Poole Park and Poole Quarter to the High Street; A detailed walking map for pedestrians in central Poole is an essential

requirement to encourage more walking; The creation and promotion of a round walk of Poole as a major visitor

attraction (Rotary Club of Poole Bay would like to help Borough of Poole Council to achieve this);

Better ROW maintenance to improve the current condition, specifically: Litter clearance at holiday times; Graffiti reporting and removal; Removal of vegetation in and on the surface of ROW and

overhanging them5.3 In the second year of our project we will:

Publicise the findings of our work; Liaise with the Council on their consideration of this report and its

recommendations; Engage with local interests to identify and take forward some celebratory

projects; and Work to change the popular impression about the ROW.

5.4 We hope that others agree with our idea for a Rotary round walk of Poole – “Walk the five Quays”. We found huge enthusiasm for the idea amongst



those we have spoken to about our project and would very much like to progress the idea. We look forward to talking more with the Borough of Poole Council about how this might happen.



APPENDIX A: TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT SURVEY AND DATABASE OF RESULTS

The Survey

1. The survey of the alleys and paths was conducted during April and May 2011 following a pilot survey in March 2011. Some missing paths and details were completed during June 2011. There were four surveyors who had been briefed to use the survey form shown in Figure A 1.

2. The numbering system used to identify paths is that adopted by the Ramblers Association in their survey in 2004.

3. The lengths of the paths were measured with a surveyor’s wheel and the widths with a laser measure. The widths were measured at each end of the path. Where the path was enclosed by fences or walls the width is between these features otherwise the width is that of the surfaced area. These measurements were made separately from the general survey of conditions.

4. The detailed condition survey was conducted once except for a number of the intensively used paths in the old town and adjacent to the quay which were surveyed twice about three weeks apart. The second survey occurring during a bank holiday period. Most paths were visited for short periods a second, third fourth time to assess their usage and to check on whether the lighting was working and whether there were any significant drainage issues following rain.

The Data Collected

5. The survey forms, as completed by the surveyors, are reproduced on sheet SForm of the accompanying Excel Workbook. Most of the data is self-explanatory but a few items need some further definition.

Is there a plaque or other identifier? Was interpreted by one surveyor to include what might be termed normal road name signs whereas the other surveyors took it to mean special signs of a historic nature on an adjoining wall. However photographs were taken of the road signs and are included with the results.

Is the path lit by public street lights? In a number of cases paths and alleys are lit by public lights on adjoining paths or roads and notes have been made accordingly. Where the paths are lit by lights maintained by a private landlord this question has been answered NO.

Is there a dropped kerb at both ends? This question has generally been interpreted as whether access for wheelchairs, prams etc is enabled. Thus where paths meet on the level and there is no relevance to the question it has been answered YES. Thus when it has been answered NO it may be concluded that there is a possible issue in this regard.



Figure A1 – Survey Form

DateTime of day path surveyed

Weather during survey

LOCATION, DIMENSIONS AND SIGNAGEPath ID NumberPath Name (if known)Path starts FROMPath goes TO

Width (metres and cm)Length (metres)Is there a fingerpost? YES NO

IF YES Is it correct? YES NOIF NO what should it say?

Is there a plaque or other identifier FROM YES NOTO YES NO

IF YES PLEASE TAKE PHOTOGRAPH(S)

FEATURES OF THE PATHWhat type of surface does it have? TARMAC YES NO

PAVING YES NOGRAVEL YES NO

COBBLES YES NOOTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

Is the path lit by public street lights? YES NOIF YES How many lights are there?

Is there a dropped kerb at both ends? YES NOONE END? (specify which end) FROM TO

Are there any barriers on the path? YES NOIF YES Are the barriers easily passable (i.e a

usable width of 1.2m from all sides)YES NO

IF YES specify type STAGGERED BARRIER YES NOBOLLARDS YES NO

GATES YES NOOTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

Is the path wide enough for walkers and cyclists to pass safely?

YES NO

GENERAL AMBIENCEIs there any graffiti? YES NO

IF YES PLEASE PHOTOGRAPH IF YES Is the graffiti offensive? YES NO

Is graffiti on private walls/fences? YES NO

If possible give address of private property

Is there any litter? YES NOIF YES indicate how much e.g. little / lots)

Dog mess? YES NO

IF YES how much e.g. 1 / 2 / 3 deposits

Are there litter/dedicated dog waste bins? YES NO

IF YES are they well maintained? YES NOIF YES how many bins?

Does the path smell? YES NOIF YES Describe the smell

PROW Condition Survey FormNote to surveyors please delete YES/NO as appropriate in each case

Is using the path a pleasant experience? YES NODo you feel safe using the path? YES NOWould you choose to use the path if there were an alternative?

YES NO

UTILITY OF THE PATHIs there any overhanging vegetation? YES NO

If YES, can you identify from where?IF YES PLEASE PHOTOGRAPH

Is there any:Surface Vegetation? YES NOIf YES, can you identify its whereabouts?

Is there a Bus Stop nearby? YES NOIF YES What number buses run from it?Is there a raised kerb next to the stop? YES NO

Is there a shelter at the stop? YES NOIs there a seat at the stop? YES NO

INFORMATION REQUIRING FURTHER SURVEY VISITS OR DESK RESEARCH(During main survey complete as much information below as you can)

How well used is the path. Note number of users during period of survey2nd visit date/time;3rd visit date/time;4th visit date/time;Is the route useful to today’s users? Please state why BELOW

YES NO

Is the route (in your opinion) historically significant? Please state why BELOW

YES NO

Are there any puddles, drainage issues? YES NOIF YES PLEASE PHOTOGRAPH

Do the street lights work? YES NO

IF NO identify those that do NOT work

Grid Reference (TAKEN AT MIDDLE OF PATH AT EACH END) FROM

What improvements could be made to improve the user's experience?

Any other comments?



Does the path smell? This has not been interpreted in a wholly negative context-thus where there was a pleasant smell this has been noted.

Is there any overhanging vegetation? This has not been interpreted in a wholly negative context – thus where there are trees this has been noted, including where this may reduce the daylight available to the path.

Is there a bus stop nearby? Most paths are not that far from a bus route so we have interpreted this to mean Is there a bus stop within sight of the end of the path? The bus service of most relevance to the survey area is town centre circular service 1 which passes along the lower High Street, the Quay, Ballard Road, Labrador Drive, Catalina Drive, Newfoundland Drive and Seldown Bridge before linking to the hospital on Longfleet Road and returning via Towngate Bridge, Nortthgate and Lagland Street. Details of the stopping places of this service were collected in the survey. Other services do pass through parts of the area but have less relevance to most people living in the area and may not have been fully identified in the survey. These include services 9, 152 and 387 servicing the Hamworthy, Rockley Park and Upton areas of the town via the Old Town area.

How well used is the path? Several visits were made to each path and the number of people using the path at that time noted. This is a snap shot of use over a maximum of 10 minutes.

Is the route historically significant? This has been answered from the personal knowledge of the surveyors, two of whom have a long association with Poole. However it is our intention to follow up some of this information from historical records as a later phase of this project.

Do the street lights work? Some of the paths outside of the town centre and quay area have not been visited at night. Of the paths visited ALL the lights were working. In any event this is very transient information.

Grid references? In the event it was decided that grid references were not needed and the authors worked with the GIS mapping team to ensure correspondence between the mapping and the survey evidence.

The Results Database

6. The survey results have been submitted to the Council on a CD that contains an Excel Workbook and two folders of pictures.

7. The Excel workbook is called ; POOLE PATHS AND ALLEYS.XLS In order for this workbook to function correctly it also needs a folder containing almost 600 photographs-these are thumbnail type images. This folder called “pictures” MUST BE located as a sub-folder to that which contains the main EXCEL Workbook.

8. The workbook has the following sheets;

Control, Results, ResultsSpecial, ViewOriginalPics, Definitions, SForm, SurveyData and these are described below.

SForm-This sheet is password protected and cannot be altered and shows the survey forms, as completed by the surveyors. This data has been analysed using macros to prepare a single cell entry appropriate for each data item and this is shown in column F. Column H is a copy of column F without the macros and is used to prepare the sheet SurveyData.

SurveyData-This sheet is password protected and is the data contained in column H of the SForm sheets, but has been organised on a landscape



basis with the data description labels in column A. This sheet can be analysed using all the normal Excel features and can be used to populate a GIS system or similar database. However owing to the number of fields and the length of many of the text items it is not a convenient way to review the results.

9. In order to review the results the remaining sheets have been prepared and these are accessed from the Control sheet.

Control - The workbook will automatically open with this sheet displayed. Access to the results by path is achieved through the use of the dropdown list on this sheet. When the workbook is first opened this dropdown list must be populated by clicking the START button. A path can then be selected from the list, (which is in path number order and shows the starting location of the path). The results for the path are then displayed in sheet Results (Figure A 2). The control sheet may also be used to review the paths by feature – for example all the paths with graffiti at the time of the survey. Clicking the Review by Feature button will initialise the system for this and transfer the user to sheet ResultsSpecial (Figure A 3). The Results sheet shows thumbnail type pictures of the paths. To enable this feature without requiring excessive amounts of storage and processing the original pictures have been reduced by 85%.

10. However by clicking the Review Original Pictures button the user can view the original camera pictures. It has been assumed that these pictures are stored elsewhere, for example on a CD, and after clicking this button the user is asked to locate the folder with the original pictures and to select anyone – this tells the system where they are and avoids the user having to do this again. The user is then transferred to the sheet ViewOriginalPictures.



Figure A 2 – Sheet Results

LOCATION DIMENSIONS AND SIGNAGE

ID 1103 Bowling Green Alley

FROM New Orchard (adj Bowling Green Alley) TO Path 1102; enclosed paved path with iron drainage channel.

PATH IS 2m WIDE & 14.9m LONG. NO FINGER POST, NO PLAQUES,

FEATURESThe surface types are; purbeck stone 1103 Bowling Green Alley looking north from jnctn with 1102.

Path lit by 1 public street lights.

There are dropped kerbs at both ends of path.

There are NO barriers.

The path is NOT wide enough for walkers and cyclists to pass safely.

GENERAL AMBIENCE

There is NO graffiti. 1103 Bowling Green Alley 2

There was NO litter.

There was NO dogs mess. There were NO dog waste bins.

The path does NOT smell.

Using the path was a pleasant experience. The path felt safe. I would choose the path if there were an alternative.

UTILITYThere was no overhanging vegetation. 1103 Bowling Green Alley looking to 1102 from centre of alley.

There was no surface vegetation.

There was a bus stop for route 1, 9, 152 The stop has a raised kerb, a shelter, and a seat.

During the survey(s) 0, 0 people were using the path.

The path is useful today because it provides; access to adjoining property

The path has historical significance because - dates from 18th century

SURVEYORS COMMENTS 1103 Bowling Green Alley 3

CLICK NEXT BUTTON FOR MORE PICTURES

Link with works to other half of Bowling Green Alley. Best alley in High Street area with good enclosed views from both ends.

PREVLIST NEXTPRINT



Figure A 3 – Sheet ResultsSpecial

1069 West Quay Road (opp Barbers Piles)1071 Barbers Piles (adj 11) USE THIS DROP DOWN BOX1072 Barbers Piles (adj 17) TO SELECT SPECIAL FEATURE1074 The Quay 1076 St James Close (adj 14) / Path 1075)1078 St James Close (adj 16) USE THIS DROP DOWN BOX TO VIEW SUMMARY 1080 Sarum Street (adj Cranberries Bistro) DETAILS FOR PATHS WITH FEATURE SELECTED ABOVE1085 Path 10841088 The Quay (btwn Portsmouth Hoy PH & Oyster Quay PH)1089 The Quay (btwn Poole Arms PH & John Carter)1090 The Quay (btwn Enefco House & Poole Arms PH)1094 High Street (btwn 27/29)1095 Markt Street1098 West Street (adj 18 St Aubyns Court)1105 High Street (btwn 73/75)1106 High Street (adj W E Boone & Co Ltd)1108 Lagland Street (adj Drake Court)1110 East Quay Road (r/o 10 Drake Road)1112 Lagland Street (opp disabled car park)1120 Green Road (adj 110)1121 Green Road (btwn 65/67)1122 Emerson Road (btwn 44/48))1123 East Quay Road (adj 5)1124 Path 11231125 Skinner Street (adj 72)1139 Green Road (r/o 7 Vallis Close)1141 Vallis Close (adj 14)1142 Ballard Road (adj Lifeboat Museum)1150 Colborne Close (r/o12)1151 Lander Close (adj 55A)1159 Lander Close (adj 87)1162 Lander Close (btwn 12/18)1165 Lander Close (btwn 30/34)1186 Taverner Close (adj 35)1200 Catalina Drive (opp Path 1192)1201 Catalina Drive (opp Path 1196)

Paths with surface vegetation

1076 St James Close (adj 14) / Path 1075)

PRINT RETURN

DEFINITIONS



CONTROL SHEET

Project Name: Project to map and promote the Rights of Way of Old Town, Poole and area

Document Title: Condition survey of the rights of way in Old Town, Poole and area

Client : Borough of Poole Council

ISSUE HISTORY

Issue No. Date Details1 5/06/11 Outline of report

2 12/07/11 Draft Final Report 3 19/07/11 Draft Final Report –

findings and recommendations 4 30/08/11 Final Report

Originator: Don Nutt, Brian Martin

Other Contributors: John Biggs, Sue Bellamy,

Review By: Print: Brian Martin

DISTRIBUTION

Clients: Sophia O’Sullivan

Rotary Club of Poole Bay: Don Nutt, Brian Martin

document.docx

Rotary Club of Poole Bay Control Sheet

survey of the rights of way in central poole and...

Documents