supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of...

44
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020 Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN (TIME : 12:00 NOON) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate [ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)] 1 W.P.(C) No. 13029/1985 PIL-W M.C. MEHTA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[P-1] Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.[IMPL], RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA[IMPL], P. K. JAIN[INT], MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [R-1], GURMEET SINGH MAKKER, [R-1], VIJAY PANJWANI[R-1], a V. K. VERMA[R-1], UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN[R-1], T. V. RATNAM[R-1], SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH[R-1], SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN[R-1], SURYA KANT[R-1], SUJEETA a SRIVASTAVA[R-1], SUDHIR MENDIRATTA[R-1], SHRI NARAIN[R-1], SHALINI KAUL[R-1][IMPL], SARVAM RITAM KHARE[R-1], SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], SANDEEP a NARAIN[R-1], S. S. SHROFF[R-1], [IMPL], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI[R-1], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-1], [INT], RAVINDRA BANA[R-1], RANI CHHABRA[R-1], a RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-1], [IMPL], RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-1], RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1][IMPL], RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-1], R. P. GUPTA[R-1], PRIYA PURI[R-1], PRAVEEN a SWARUP[R-1], PRASHANT KUMAR[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI[R-1], PAVAN KUMAR[R-1], PARIJAT SINHA[R-1], NANDINI GIDWANEY[R-1], MUNAWWAR a NASEEM[R-1], MUKESH K. GIRI[R-1], MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], MOHIT D. RAM[R-1][IMPL], MANJULA GUPTA[R-1], K. R. SASIPRABHU[R-1], HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], HARDEEP a SINGH ANAND[R-1], G. PRAKASH[R-1], EJAZ MAQBOOL[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], CHIRAG M. SHROFF[R-1], BINU TAMTA[R-1], BINA GUPTA[R-1], BIMAL ROY

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jan-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 12:00 NOON)

MISCELLANEOUS HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

1 W.P.(C) No. 13029/1985PIL-W

M.C. MEHTA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1],APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.[IMPL],

RAJESH KUMARCHAURASIA[IMPL], P. K. JAIN[INT],MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [R-1],GURMEET SINGH MAKKER, [R-1],VIJAY PANJWANI[R-1],a V. K. VERMA[R-1], UMESHKUMAR KHAITAN[R-1], T. V.RATNAM[R-1], SUSHIL KUMARSINGH[R-1], SUSHIL KUMARJAIN[R-1], SURYA KANT[R-1],SUJEETAa SRIVASTAVA[R-1], SUDHIRMENDIRATTA[R-1], SHRINARAIN[R-1], SHALINIKAUL[R-1][IMPL], SARVAM RITAMKHARE[R-1], SANJAY KUMARVISEN[R-1], SANDEEPa NARAIN[R-1], S. S. SHROFF[R-1],[IMPL], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-1],RUCHI KOHLI[R-1], RAVINDRAKUMAR[R-1], [INT], RAVINDRABANA[R-1], RANI CHHABRA[R-1],a RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-1], [IMPL],RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-1], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1][IMPL],RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-1], R. P.GUPTA[R-1], PRIYA PURI[R-1],PRAVEENa SWARUP[R-1], PRASHANTKUMAR[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1],PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI[R-1],PAVAN KUMAR[R-1], PARIJATSINHA[R-1], NANDINIGIDWANEY[R-1], MUNAWWARa NASEEM[R-1], MUKESH K.GIRI[R-1], MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1],MOHIT D. RAM[R-1][IMPL],MANJULA GUPTA[R-1], K. R.SASIPRABHU[R-1], HEMANTIKAWAHI[R-1], HARDEEPa SINGH ANAND[R-1], G.PRAKASH[R-1], EJAZMAQBOOL[R-1], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-1], CHIRAG M.SHROFF[R-1], BINU TAMTA[R-1],BINA GUPTA[R-1], BIMAL ROY

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

a JAD[R-1], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-1], B. SUNITARAO[R-1], ASHOK MATHUR[R-1],ANNAM D. N. RAO[R-1],ANIRUDDHADESHMUKH[R-1][IMPL], ANILKUMAR JHA[R-1],a ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], AJITPUDUSSERY[R-1], ABHISHEK[R-1],SAHARYA & CO.[R-1], PAREKH &CO.[R-1], M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES[R-1], [IMPL],KHAITAN &a CO.[R-1], K. SARADA DEVI[R-1],PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-13]YASH PAL DHINGRA[IMPL], VIVEKGUPTA[IMPL], VIPIN NAIR[IMPL],VINOD SHARMA[IMPL], V. N.a RAGHUPATHY[IMPL], V. G.PRAGASAM[IMPL], UTTARABABBAR[IMPL], TULIKAMUKHERJEE[IMPL], TAPESHKUMAR SINGH[IMPL], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[IMPL], SURABHIa SANCHITA[IMPL], SHUVODEEPROY[IMPL], SHOVANMISHRA[IMPL], SHISHIRDESHPANDE[IMPL], SATYAMITRA[R-1], [IMPL], SANTOSHKUMAR - I[IMPL], SAMEERa SHRIVASTAVA[IMPL], SAKSHIKAKKAR[IMPL], RISHIMATOLIYA[IMPL], RISHIMALHOTRA[IMPL], RAJ BAHADURYADAV[IMPL], R. C. KOHLI[IMPL],PRANAV SACHDEVA[IMPL],a PRADEEP MISRA[IMPL], NITINSALUJA[IMPL], NIDHI MOHANPARASHAR[IMPL], NEERAJSHEKHAR[IMPL], NARENDRAKUMAR[IMPL], MOHITPAUL[IMPL], MAYURIa RAGHUVANSHI[IMPL], MANJUJETLEY[IMPL], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[IMPL], M.YOGESH KANNA[IMPL], M. SHOEBALAM[IMPL], M. P.DEVANATH[IMPL], LUBNAa NAAZ[IMPL], KIRANBHARDWAJ[IMPL], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[IMPL], K. ENATOLISEMA[IMPL], JOGY SCARIA[IMPL],JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[IMPL], GOPALJHA[IMPL], GAUTAMa NARAYAN[IMPL], GAURAV[INT],[IMPL], GARIMA PRASHAD[IMPL],DURGA DUTT[IMPL], DIVYAROY[IMPL], DEBOJITBORKAKATI[IMPL], D. ABHINAVRAO[INT], [IMPL], B.a V. BALARAM DAS[IMPL], AYUSHSHARMA[IMPL], ASTHATYAGI[IMPL], ASHUTOSHDUBEY[IMPL], ANUSHREEPRASHIT KAPADIA[IMPL], ANILKUMAR[IMPL]YOGINDERa HANDOO[INT], VISHWAJITSINGH[INT], VINODH KANNAB.[INT], VINAY GARG[IMPL], [INT],VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[INT],SURBHI MEHTA[INT], SUNILFERNANDES[INT],a SUBHRO SANYAL[INT],SHEKHAR KUMAR[INT], SHAGUNMATTA[INT], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[INT], SANDEEPKUMAR JHA[INT], RAM SANKAR &CO[INT], RAJIV YADAV[INT],

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

a RAJAN NARAIN[INT], PUJASHARMA[INT], PRAKASH RANJANNAYAK[INT], P.PARMESWARAN[R-1], [INT], NIDHIJASWAL[INT], MRITUNJAY KUMARSINHA[INT], MISHAa ROHATGI[INT], MAHFOOZAHSAN NAZKI[INT], KULDIPSINGH[INT], KARANJAWALA &CO.[INT], G. INDIRA[IMPL], [INT],DIVYA JYOTI SINGH[INT], DIKSHARAI[INT], D.a N. GOBURDHAN[INT], CHARUAMBWANI[INT], CHANDRAPRAKASH[INT], ASWATHIM.K.[INT], ASTHA SHARMA[INT],ANURAG KISHORE[INT], ANUJBHANDARI[INT], ANASa TANWIR[INT], AKSHAY GIRISHRINGE[INT], AAKARSHANADITYA[INT], S. NARAIN &CO.[R-1], [INT]

(i) IA NO. 101822/2020 (APPLN. FOR DIRECTIONS ONBEHALF OF FEDERATION OF AUTOMOBILE DEALERSASSOCIATION)(ii) IA NOS. 95814 AND 95815/2020 (APPLNS.FORIMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTION ON B/O SANGHVI TECHNOPRODUCTS)(iii) IA NOS. 90451, 90456 AND 92827 (APPLNSFOR IMPLEADMENT, EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ANDDIRECTIONS ON B/O BAIJNATH SINGH AND ORS(iv) I.A.NOS. 108338 AND 108342/2020 (APPLNS. FORIMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS ON B/O YOUNGOPTIMISTICTRANSPORT)v) I. A. NOS. 87637, 87638/2020 AND 91082(APPLNS. FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS ANDPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON B/OMAZDOORAWAS AND KALYAN SAMITI AND ORS.)vi) I.A. NOS. 90196,90202 AND 90198, 90203/2020 (APPLNS. FORINTERVENTION, DIRECTIONS AND EXEMPTION FROMFILINGNOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT ON B/O AJAY MAKEN ANDANR.)“ONLY” IN W.P.(C) NO. 13029/1985 ARELISTED.“ONLY” NAME OF THE FOLLOWING ADVOCATESMAY BETREATED TO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LIST:MR. HARISHN. SALVE, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MS. APARAJITA SINGH, SR.ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, ADVOCATE(A.C.)MR. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY, ADVOCATE(A.C.)PETITIONER-IN-PERSONMR. G.S. MAKKER, MR. RAJBAHADUR YADAV,MR. SANJAY KR. VISEN, MR. KAMLENDRAMISHRA,MR. LUBNA NAAZ, MR. B.V. BALRAMDAS, M/S. S. NARAINAND CO., MS. ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIAMR. MOHITPAULMR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF, MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP, MR.D.N. GOBURDHUN,MR. SANDEEP KR. JHA, MR. SATYAMITRA, MR. NITIN SALUJA, ADVOCATES

2 W.P.(C) No. 114/2014PIL-W

COMMON CAUSE PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN, SUNIL

KUMAR JAIN, SHIBASHISHMISRA[IMPL], RUCHI KOHLI,RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[INT], RAMENDRA MOHANPATNAIK, RAJ KUMAR MEHTA,a NAVEEN KUMAR, [IMPL], MUKULKUMAR, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA, MOVITA[OBJ],KARANJAWALA & CO., HIMINDERLAL, GAURAV KEJRIWAL, E. C.AGRAWALA, BALAJI

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

a SRINIVASAN, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, ABHISHEK SHARMA,KIRTI RENU MISHRA, AURA &CO.[INT], [INT], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1], SATYABRATAPANDA[R-5],a [IMPL]SHOVAN MISHRA[IMPL], SANDEEPDEVASHISH DAS[IMPL], PRESHITVILAS SURSHE[IMPL], LAKSHMIRAMAN SINGH[OBJ], [IMPL],DHANANJAYA MISHRA[IMPL],a ASHOK PANIGRAHI[IMPL],[IMPL], KHAITAN & CO., [IMPL],SHADAN FARASAT[I-1][IMPL]UTTARA BABBAR[INT], HITENDRANATH RATH[INT], ANNAM D. N.RAO[INT]

{Mention Memo}1) IA NO. 101547/2020 (APPLN. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME)“ONLY” IN W.P.(C) NO. 114/2014 IS LISTED.NAMES OF THEFOLLOWING ADVOCATES MAY ALSO BE TREATEDTO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LISTMR. HARISH N. SALVE,SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MS. APARAJITA SINGH, SR. ADVOCATE(A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR.SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY, ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR.PRASHANT BHUSHANMR. B.K. PRASADMR. GURMEETSINGH MAKKERMS. KIRTI R. MISHRAMR. DHANANJAYAMISHRAMR. NAVEENKUMAR, ADVOCATESIA No. 101547/2020 - EXTENSION OF TIME

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

3 ARBIT.CASE(C) No. 35/2020XVI-A

STC OMAN LLC SURUCHII AGGARWAL

VersusRMZ NORTH STAR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION

4 SLP(C) No.13348-13351/2020XIV

PRATIBHA CHAUHAN RAJEEV SINGH

VersusPOOJA AND ORS.{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.114743/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

5 SLP(C) No. 13362/2020IV-B

RAJBIR SINGH AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

VersusSANJAY AND ORS. NARENDER KUMAR

VERMA[CAVEAT]{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.114801/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

6 SMTP(C) No. 2-3/2020XVI-A

IN RE : LETTER DATED 3/3/2020 RECEIVED FROM HIGH COURTOF SIKKIM

BY COURTS MOTION

FOR ADMISSION

7 W.P.(C) No. 1292/2020PIL-W

AJAY AGRAWAL PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and IA No.116199/2020-PERMISSION TOAPPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

8 SLP(Crl) No. 7797/2019II-A

GOTILAL DALCHAND JAIN MOHIT D. RAM

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.{Mention Memo}IA No. 125747/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 125748/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 127721/2019 - LEAVE OF THE COURT UNDERSECTION 320, CR.P.C. TO COMPOUND/COMPROMISE

9 SLP(Crl) No. 4878/2020II-B

MOHAMMAD ARIF RAJEEV SINGH

VersusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.102721/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENTIA No. 102721/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

10 SLP(C) No. 24950/2015III

PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH ANIRUDH SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], JESAL

WAHI[R-2], HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-3]IA No. 194868/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 194887/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 194867/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 194885/2019 - STAY APPLICATION

10.1 ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 786/2020X

NARENDRA KUMAR AMBALAL RAVAT ANANDO MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. JESAL WAHI[R-2]FORFOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 72170/2020FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 95984/2020IA No. 95984/2020 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 72170/2020 - EX-PARTE STAY

10.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30635/2015III

STATE ELECTION COMMISSION RANJEETA ROHATGI

VersusVIRENDRASINH MAFAJI VAGHELA AP & J CHAMBERS[CAVEAT]FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT ON IA 2/2015IA No. 2/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

11 CONMT.PET.(C) No.467/2020 in W.P.(C) No.13029/1985PIL-W

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusJAYANT MHAISKAR AND ORS.IN W.P.(C) No. - 13029/1985,[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH W.P.(C) NO. 13029/1985 ]IA No. 109505/2020 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENTIA No. 47565/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 109502/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM PERSONALAPPEARANCE

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

IA No. 81682/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

12 C.A. No. 2814/2020XVII

RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD K. R. SASIPRABHU

VersusTATA COMMUNICATION LTD. AND ORS. HARSH KAUSHIK[CAVEAT],

ABHINAVRAMKRISHNA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT], FOX MANDAL &CO.[CAVEAT], SANJAY KAPUR[R-3]

IA No.68992/2020-EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF and IANo.68967/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.68966/2020-EX-PARTESTAYand IA No.68995/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT and IA No.68999/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.69013/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT and IA No.68982/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.69022/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.69082/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.68997/2020-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.69020/2020-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.68971/2020-PERMISSION TOFILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IA No.48412/2020-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.69008/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No.68968/2020-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPEDDOCUMENTS

12.1 ConnectedC.A. No. 2725/2020XVII

ASSOCIATION OF COMPETITIVE TELECOM OPERATORS (ACTO)AND ANR.

FOX MANDAL & CO.

VersusTATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. AND ORS. HARSH KAUSHIK[CAVEAT],

ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[CAVEAT],SANJAY KAPUR[R-3]

IA No.61066/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.61064/2020-EX-PARTESTAY and IA No.61071/2020-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

13 CONMT.PET.(C) No.491/2020 in W.P.(C) No.4677/1985PIL-W

DR.MANJULA KRIPPENDORF PATHAK PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusSHRI GYANESH BHARTI (IAS) AND ANR. PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1], [R-2],

[R-2]IN W.P.(C) No. - 4677/1985,IA No. 78162/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

14 SLP(C) No.10675-10676/2020IX

ARUNA SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], T.

R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-4]IA No. 88942/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 88943/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 88940/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

14.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11416/2020IX

ARUNA SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.95569/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.95565/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

No.95568/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT andIA No.95570/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

15 W.P.(C) No. 1122/2020X

ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI NIRNIMESH DUBE

VersusTHE MAHARASHTRA STATE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-2],

SACHIN PATIL[R-4]LD. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA.MR. ARVIND DATAR, LD. SENIOR ADVOCATE (AMICUSCURIAE)IA No. 114818/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSIONIA No. 111329/2020 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSIONIA No. 107480/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 98977/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 114819/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 111330/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 107481/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 105533/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITIA No. 98975/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 98974/2020 - STAY APPLICATION

NEW DELHI20-11-2020 21:28:02

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 12:00 NOON)

MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[DIRECTION MATTERS]

16 C.A. No.4827-4830/2009XII

COMMR.OF CUS. AND CEN.EXC.COIMBATORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S T.STANES AND CO.LTD. RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1][OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 5/2009 - STAY APPLICATION

17 C.A. No. 3751/2011XII-A

SUPDT.OF CEN.EXC. AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SANGHI POLYSTERS LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]

18 C.A. No.9682-9684/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE THANE ICOMMISSIONER

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S MUKUL ENGINEERING WORKS AND ANR. ANDANR.

PRAVEEN KUMAR

[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 4/2010 - STAY APPLICATION

18.1 ConnectedC.A. No.1036-1037/2012XVII-A

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.THANE-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSHRI GANESH CHANDRA GHOSH M/S. SPACETECHCOYO EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD.

K J JOHN AND CO

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2012IA No. 3/2012 - STAY APPLICATION

18.2 ConnectedC.A. No.17804-17809/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE THANE 1 B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SPACETECH EQUIPMENTS AND STRUCTURALSPVT LTDIA

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 104068/2017IA No. 104068/2017 - EX-PARTE STAY

19 C.A. No.2520-2521/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SRI SAI ANNAPURNA PACKAGING(I) PVT. LTD. ANU GUPTA[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]

20 C.A. No.2264-2265/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PARIJAT SINHA[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 3/2012 - STAY APPLICATION

21 S.L.P.(C)...CC No.7739/2013XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BINJUSARIA METAL BOX CO. LTD.[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 1/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

22 C.A. No. 9352/2013XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S NATIONAL ENGINEERING (I) LTD PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1][OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 2/2013 - STAY APPLICATION

23 C.A. No. 10421/2013XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S EID PARRY (I) LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]

24 C.A. No.2450-2451/2014XVII-A

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE.COMMNR. LUDHIANA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. OSWAL WOOLEN MILLS LTD. THR. ITS M.D. RAJESH KUMARFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014[OFFICEREPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 3/2014 - STAY APPLICATION

25 C.A. No.11090-11092/2017XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE JAIPUR 1AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD ANDORS.

PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 76591/2017 - EX-PARTE STAY

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

NEW DELHI20-11-2020 21:44:02

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPHHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[BAIL APPLICATIONS]

1 Crl.A. No. 76/2020II-B

TAHER VAJIYUDDIN RANGWALA AND ANR. RAVI PANWAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]{Mention Memo}IA No. 49373/2020 - GRANT OF BAIL

[ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)]

2 Crl.A. No.1205-1208/2011II-C

MOOSA @ TADA MOOSA @ MOOSA MOHIDEEN ANDORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7],[P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13], [P-14]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE AD.S.P.SIT CBCID M. YOGESH KANNA{Mention Memo}IA No. 111441/2020 - GRANT OF BAIL

3 SLP(C) No.15652-15655/2016IV-B

JASPAL SINGH ETC. ETC. RAVINDRA BANA

VersusUNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ETC. ETC. SHREE PAL SINGH[ONLY I.A NO. 99411/2020 IN SLP (c) NO.1027-1034/2018 TO BE LISTED]Reply affidavit has been filed in I.A NO.99411/2020 IN SLP (c) NO. 1027-1034/2018

3.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No.1027-1034/2018IV-B

THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusTEJ RAM AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN

SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-18],[R-19], [R-21],

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

a [R-23], [R-24], [R-25],[R-26], [R-27], [R-28], [R-30],[R-31], [R-32], [R-34], [R-35],[R-36], [R-40], [R-54], [R-55],[R-56], [R-57], [R-58],a [R-80], [R-81], RAVINDRABANA[R-22]

IA FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 99411/2020Reply affidavit filed.IA No. 99411/2020 - MODIFICATION

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

4 SLP(C) No. 12747/2020XIV

INDURE PRIVATE LIMITED ANKIT ANANDRAJ SHAH

VersusJMC PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. SHAMIK SHIRISHBHAI

SANJANWALA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.109470/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.109472/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

5 SLP(C) No. 13329/2020IX

VISHWA BHARATI FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED DHULE SHASHIBHUSHAN P.ADGAONKAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER TRIBAL DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT NASHIK AND ORS.

SANDEEP SUDHAKARDESHMUKH[CAVEAT]

{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.114701/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.114702/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

6 SLP(Crl) No. 5596/2020II-A

MADAN SHAVETA MAHAJAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.116153/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

7 SLP(Crl) No. 5669/2020II

INDRA NAMIT SAXENA

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.116909/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.116910/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.andIA No.116916/2020-APPLICATION FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALVAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

8 SLP(Crl) No. 5676/2020II-C

KESHAV RAJ ANUPAM MISHRA

VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. NIKILESH

RAMACHANDRAN[CAVEAT]{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.115764/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.115766/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.andIA No.115761/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

9 SLP(Crl) No. 5519/2020II-B

ANJLI @ MEENA KUMARI MOHAN LAL SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.114973/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

10 SLP(Crl) No. 5744/2020II-A

PRIYASHARAN SINGH THAKUR NIKHIL JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.118568/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.118569/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

11 SLP(Crl) No. 3543/2020II-B

PARAMVIR SINGH SAINI BANKEY BIHARI

VersusBALJIT SINGH AND ORS. NIKUNJ DAYAL[R-1], [R-2],

JASPREET GOGIA[R-3], [R-3],[R-4], [R-4], [R-5], [R-5], B. V.BALARAM DAS[R-6],ABHIMANYU TEWARI[R-10],SUMEER SODHI[R-13],a K. ENATOLI SEMA[R-19], C.K. SASI[R-21], [R-21], ARJUNGARG[R-22], PUKHRAMBAMRAMESH KUMAR[R-24], D. K.DEVESH[R-29], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-31], CHANCHALa KUMAR GANGULI[R-36], V.G. PRAGASAM[R-43]LIZ MATHEW[INT]

REF: R/P DATED 05.08.2020Shri Siddharth Dave, Learned Senior Counsel,appointed as Amicus Curiae, vide order dated16.07.2020.IA No. 63144/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 63139/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 63148/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

12 SLP(Crl) No. 4297/2020II-A

AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY RAI FAUZIA SHAKIL

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.IA No. 89736/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

13 SLP(Crl) No. 4668/2020II-C

BABULAL AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1]CUSTODY MATTERWITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEFIA No. 98239/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

14 SLP(C) No. 21953/2019III

SARINE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PAI AMIT

VersusDIYORA AND BHANDERI CORPORATION AND ORS. P. V. DINESH[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.IA No. 82228/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 107254/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 62915/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 82229/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 157559/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 150961/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

15 SLP(C) No. 10719/2020XII-A

ALLA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY ARUNA GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. MAHFOOZ AHSAN

NAZKI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

IA No. 90474/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 89334/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

16 SLP(C) No. 11431/2020XIV

ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTYLTD.

GARIMA BAJAJ

VersusMMTC LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI

MENON[CAVEAT]

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.95698/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.95697/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVITand IA No.95699/2020-PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

17 SLP(C) No. 12483/2020IV-A

ABHIJEET TOLL ROAD (KARNATAKA) LTD. SOAYIB QURESHI

VersusGOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1],

DHARMAPRABHAS LAWASSOCIATES[R-2]

IA No. 105078/2020 - APPLICATION FOR TAKINGON RECORDIA No. 110238/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

[DISPOSAL/FINAL DISPOSAL AT ADMISSION STAGE - CIVIL CASES]

18 SLP(C) No.2109-2110/2020IX

CHOWGULE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. AMITA SINGH KALKAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT ANDORS.

MAYANK PANDEY[R-3], [R-4],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13],[R-14], [R-15], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-17], [R-18],a [R-19], [R-20], [R-21],[R-22], [R-24], [R-25], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-33],[R-34], [R-36], [R-40], [R-42],[R-45], [R-47], [R-49],a [R-50], [R-52]

IA No. 95198/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING REPLY AFFIDAVITIA No. 96750/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 95760/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 95758/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 6594/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 96747/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 73075/2020 - VACATING STAY

19 SLP(C) No. 12766/2020XVI-A

M/S GALAXY TRANSPORTAGENCIES,CONTRACTORS, TRADERS, TRANSPORTSAND SUPPLIERS

ADEEL AHMED

VersusM/S NEW J.K. ROADWAYS,FLEET OWNERS ANDTRANSPORT CONTRACTORS AND ORS.

SYED MEHDIIMAM[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.109588/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.109589/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 2 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

NEW DELHI20-11-2020 21:44:12

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATNOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE HEARING OF SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN THIS COURT AT 10.30A.M. IS OVER ]

MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

1 Diary No. 8010-2020XVII-A

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusPRATYUSH KUMAR SHARMA RAJENDER PRASAD[CAVEAT]{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45598/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.45599/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

2 MA 1777/2020IV-B

KARAMBIR SINGH KAVEETAWADIA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN D No. - 18305/2017,IA No. 76056/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIONIA No. 76055/2020 - RESTORATION

3 W.P.(C) No. 1094/2020X

SHILESH SIVASANKARAN PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.96062/2020-PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE INPERSON[INTERACTION DONE ]

4 SLP(C) No. 11088/2020III

HANSABEN PRATAPSINH BARIA TARUNA SINGH GOHIL

VersusGOHIL PRITHVIRAJSINH SURENDRASINH AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.92402/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.92817/2020-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSIONto file additional documentIA No. 92817/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 92402/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 119512/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

5 SLP(C) No. 13571/2020XII

K. ILAVARASAN AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusR. VIJIYARAJ AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[CAVEAT], KSN

& CO.[CAVEAT], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-4], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[R-5], [R-6]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.90098/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.90099/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.IA No. 90098/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 90099/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 118048/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 117329/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

6 SLP(Crl) No. 3284/2020II

ARVIND KUMAR ABHIGYA KUSHWAH

VersusYOGESH KUMAR AND ANR. NEERAJ KUMAR[R-1],

SHASHANK SHEKHARSINGH[R-2]

IA No. 54923/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 66762/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 72015/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54918/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 102511/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 54920/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

7 SLP(Crl) No. 5022/2020II-A

MD. ILYAS HUSSAIN @ MD. ILLIYAS SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH CBIFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.105722/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 105722/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 114948/2020 - EXTENSION OF TIME

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

8 SLP(C) No. 20260/2019IX

SHRIMANT RAJE VIKRAMSINH LAXMANSINH RAJEJADHAVRAO AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1], [P-2],[P-3]

Versus

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)GULAB DIDALI SHAH FAKIR AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO

ADSURE[CAVEAT], M. Y.DESHMUKH[CAVEAT], J.SHEKHAR & CO.[CAVEAT],SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[R-19],[R-20], RABINMAJUMDER[CAVEAT], [R-26],a [R-27], [R-28], [R-36],ARVIND S. AVHAD[R-32],[R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40],[R-41], RAHUL JOSHI[R-42]

IA No.128001/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.128000/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

9 SLP(C) No. 28027/2019XI

ANWAR SADAT SANJEEV MALHOTRA

VersusU.P. SUNNI CENTRAL WAKF BOARD AND ORS. FARRUKH

RASHEED[CAVEAT], FUZAILAHMAD AYYUBI[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], AMITSHARMA[R-5]

{Mention Memo}IA No. 182873/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 181486/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 98706/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 83320/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 105156/2020 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEFIA No. 83319/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 182872/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 98702/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

10 SLP(C) No. 29972/2019XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusATUL KUMAR DWIVEDI AND ORS. VIVEK

SHARMA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],ROBIN KHOKHAR[CAVEAT],PURUSHOTTAM SHARMATRIPATHI[CAVEAT],PREETIKADWIVEDI[CAVEAT], [R-7],NEERAJ KUMARa SHARMA[CAVEAT], DANISHZUBAIR KHAN[CAVEAT],BADRI PRASADSINGH[CAVEAT],RAJIVKUMAR[R-4], [IMPL],PALLAVI PRATAP[R-130],ROHIT AMITa STHALEKAR[R-150]TOM JOSEPH[IMPL],SHASHANK SINGH[R-121],[IMPL], SATYAJEETKUMAR[CAVEAT], [IMPL],SATISH PANDEY[IMPL],SANJEEV MALHOTRA[IMPL],

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

a SANJAY RASTOGI[IMPL],SANJAY KUMARDUBEY[IMPL], RANDHIRKUMAR OJHA[IMPL], RAKESHKUMAR[IMPL], PURNIMAJAUHARI[IMPL], PRIYANKUPADHYAY[IMPL],a PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[IMPL], MUKESHKUMAR SINGH ANDCO.[CAVEAT], [IMPL], MANOJK. MISHRA[IMPL], M. SHOEBALAM[IMPL], KAUSHALYADAV[IMPL], DURGAa DUTT[IMPL], DHANANJAYGARG[IMPL], D. K.DEVESH[IMPL], ATULESHKUMAR[IMPL], ASHWANIBHARDWAJ[IMPL], ANZU. K.VARKEY[IMPL], AMRITAKUMARI[IMPL], AMITa PAWAN[IMPL], AKSHATSRIVASTAVA[IMPL]MANISH KUMARGUPTA[IMPL], [INT], ANANDMISHRA[INT]

IA No. 54751/2020 - APPLICATION FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALVAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENTIA No. 79310/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 41922/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 55383/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 50197/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 57177/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 52664/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 54961/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 61612/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 41935/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 54102/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54960/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55384/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 56003/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 59543/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 60977/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 61614/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 68454/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 50665/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 51371/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 57653/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 59537/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 62628/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 72713/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 78566/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 50202/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 53196/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54090/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55411/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 59409/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 60834/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 61559/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 79242/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54089/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55354/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 57180/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 62620/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 68315/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 84916/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 50734/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 53187/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54525/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55405/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 59342/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 60669/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 69811/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 79190/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 53601/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 61475/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 61790/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 79339/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 84900/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54521/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 54964/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55399/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 60656/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 68475/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 50671/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 53590/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 59293/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 65994/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 79313/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 53587/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 68451/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 51370/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 81109/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 50198/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 61556/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 79235/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 57178/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 50731/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 59340/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 66331/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 79189/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 61474/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 61789/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 52357/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 52672/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM PAYINGCOURT FEEIA No. 72989/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM PAYINGCOURT FEEIA No. 68313/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 50196/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 69809/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 57176/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 79168/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 59292/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 65993/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 72986/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 78597/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 84236/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54097/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54959/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 56002/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 60976/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 79309/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 82983/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 101375/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 41921/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55381/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 57651/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 62626/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 72711/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 78564/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 89509/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 41775/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 51369/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 53195/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54749/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55408/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 59405/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 60831/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 71330/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 78355/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 81107/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 28731/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54088/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55353/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 61555/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 62617/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 77535/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 79347/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 84914/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 53185/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54524/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55014/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55402/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 60668/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 76258/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 43055/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 50729/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 53596/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 59338/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 66329/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 75769/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 79337/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 54519/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55395/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 56957/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 60655/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 61472/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 61786/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 68473/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 78906/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 41931/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 50670/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 68449/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 84898/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 84492/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

10.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30456/2019XI

DINESH KUMAR TRIPATHI AND ORS. ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. VIVEK

SHARMA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],SATYAJEET KUMAR[CAVEAT],ROBIN KHOKHAR[CAVEAT],PURUSHOTTAM SHARMATRIPATHI[CAVEAT],PREETIKADWIVEDI[CAVEAT], NEERAJa KUMAR SHARMA[CAVEAT],MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAND CO.[CAVEAT], DANISHZUBAIR KHAN[CAVEAT],BADRI PRASADSINGH[CAVEAT],RAJIVKUMAR[R-7]

IA No. 49449/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING THE SPARE COPIESIA No. 49451/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

10.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30607/2019XI

SHASHANK MISHRA AND ORS. ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. VIVEK

SHARMA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],SATYAJEET KUMAR[CAVEAT],ROBIN KHOKHAR[CAVEAT],PURUSHOTTAM SHARMATRIPATHI[CAVEAT],PREETIKADWIVEDI[CAVEAT], NEERAJa KUMAR SHARMA[CAVEAT],MUKESH KUMAR SINGHAND CO.[CAVEAT], DANISHZUBAIR KHAN[CAVEAT],BADRI PRASADSINGH[CAVEAT]

IA No. 49436/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING THE SPARE COPIESIA No. 49438/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

10.3 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30552/2019XI

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. M/S PRATAP AND CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT]IA No. 48960/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING THE SPARE COPIES

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 48962/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

10.4 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3157/2020XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusMANISH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA

TRIPATHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],[R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],a [R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20],[R-21], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],[R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32],[R-33], [R-34],a [R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38],[R-39], [R-40], [R-41], [R-42],[R-43], [R-44], [R-45], [R-46],[R-47], [R-48], [R-49], [R-50],PALLAVI PRATAP[R-52],a [R-55], [R-64]M. SHOEB ALAM[IMPL],ANAS TANWIR[IMPL]MANISH KUMAR GUPTA[INT]

FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA19726/2020FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA50206/2020FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA50207/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA50208/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA50209/2020FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA52643/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM PAYING COURT FEE ONIA 52646/2020FOR impleading party ON IA 55367/2020FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA55367/2020FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA55370/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA55372/2020FOR impleading party ON IA 59755/2020FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA59755/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA59758/2020IA No. 50207/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 55370/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 52643/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 59758/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 55372/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 50209/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 50208/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 19726/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 52646/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM PAYINGCOURT FEEIA No. 50206/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 59755/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 55367/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

10.5 ConnectedDiary No. 13480-2020XI

ANKIT KUMAR AND ORS. PALLAVI PRATAP

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[CAVEAT]IA No.65017/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.65018/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.65019/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING AFFIDAVITand IA No.65016/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEPETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)

10.6 ConnectedDiary No. 14425-2020XI

SUMIT YADAV AND ORS. ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68675/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.68676/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IANo.68677/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT and IA No.68674/2020-PERMISSIONTO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)

11 SLP(C) No.10479-10481/2020XII

MS. X GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI[R-4], M.

YOGESH KANNA[R-6]IA No. 86939/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 86937/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 86938/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

12 CONMT.PET.(C) No.560-561/2020 in SLP(C)No. 527-528/2019XVII-A

KESHAV LAL ARORA ABHISHEK GUPTA

VersusPAWAN ARORA AND ANR. K. L. JANJANI[R-1], [R-2]IN SLP(C) No. - 527/2019, IN SLP(C) No. -528/2019,FOR ADMISSION

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

13 Diary No. 15630-2020XII

DR.JANET PREMLATA JEYAPAUL PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusDR.N. SETHURAMAN AND ORS. A. KARTHIK[R-1], [R-2], [R-4],

[R-5]IA No.83854/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.83853/2020-PERMISSION TOAPPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON and IANo.83855/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES[INTERACTIONDONE]IA No. 83854/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 83853/2020 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR ANDARGUE IN PERSONIA No. 83855/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

14 Diary No. 16868-2020IV-B

SHANTI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER L.RS. NISCHAL KUMAR NEERAJ

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], [R-2]IA No.86923/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 86923/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

15 Diary No. 17660-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusGIRISH BUILDVEL PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.85664/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.85665/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT andIA No.85667/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 85664/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 85665/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 85667/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

16 SLP(C) No. 12139/2020XIV

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusKULDEEP KUMAR AND ORS. HARISH PANDEY[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

16.1 ConnectedDiary No. 19748-2020XIV

PERIOD BASIS SMC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ANDORS.

ABHISHEK GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],HARISH PANDEY[R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL[CAVEAT],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

FOR

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 93869/2020FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA94672/2020FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA101879/2020IA No. 101879/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 94672/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 93869/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEPETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)

[DISPOSAL/FINAL DISPOSAL AT ADMISSION STAGE - CIVIL CASES]

17 Diary No. 10418-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG[P-1]

VersusCHETAN INFRA BUILD PVT. LTD. AND ORS. D.KUMANAN[R-2], [R-6],

[R-7], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-15], [R-27], [R-28],SUVENDU SUVASISDASH[R-12], [R-16], [R-19],[R-21], [R-22], [R-24]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54261/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.54262/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 83260/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 54261/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 60921/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 54262/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 91569/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 83892/2020 - EXTENSION OF TIMEIA No. 83264/2020 - EXTENSION OF TIMEIA No. 60920/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

17.1 ConnectedDiary No. 17648-2020IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusSWAPNIL BUILDCON PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.107031/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.107034/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.107035/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T.

17.2 ConnectedDiary No. 17651-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusVAIBHAV TECHNO BUILD PVT. LTD.FOR

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA87777/2020IA No. 87777/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

17.3 ConnectedDiary No. 17652-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusCHETAN INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.IA No.88826/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.88827/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.88828/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

17.4 ConnectedDiary No. 17656-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusTUSHAR LAND COLE PVT. LTD.FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 86393/2020FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA86394/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA86395/2020IA No. 86394/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 86393/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 86395/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

17.5 ConnectedDiary No. 18179-2020IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusGURMIT BUILDERS PVT. LTD.FORFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA86568/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 86570/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA86575/2020IA No. 86568/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 86570/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 86575/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

17.6 ConnectedDiary No. 18328-2020IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusCHETAN INFRABUILD PVT. LTD. AND ORS. D.KUMANAN[CAVEAT]FORFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA87517/2020FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 87518/2020

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA87519/2020IA No. 87517/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 87518/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 87519/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

[DISPOSAL/FINAL DISPOSAL AT ADMISSION STAGE - CRIMINAL CASES]

18 Crl.A. No. 168/2018II-A

BANTI GUPTA @ KAMAL KUMAR GUPTA @ KAMALKISHORE GUPTA

RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1]Grant of bailIA No. 182800/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

NEW DELHI23-11-2020 13:15:58

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATNOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE HEARING OF SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN THIS COURT AT 10.30A.M. IS OVER ]

MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

19 MA 50/2019 in C.A. No.8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR AND ORS.

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]

S. S. JAUHAR[IMPL], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[IMPL],AMARJEET SINGH[IMPL],ABHISHEK SINGH[IMPL],ABHINAV AGRAWAL[IMPL]

IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,[ FOR DISPOSAL ][FOR DISPOSAL AT 2.00 P.M.]IA No. 91091/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 84065/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 59743/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 100745/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 137407/2019 -CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 103292/2020 -CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 84067/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVITIA No. 2254/2019 - EXTENSION OF TIMEIA No. 84064/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 46028/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 118798/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

19.1 ConnectedDiary No. 26552-2019IV

RAMESHWAR AND ORS. PARIJAT KISHORE

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)IA No. 110995/2019 -CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

19.2 ConnectedMA 2067/2020 in C.A.No. 8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR AND ANR. SIDDHARTH BATRA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FOR ADMISSION and IA No.111562/2020-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IANo.111563/2020-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONand IA No.111557/2020-APPLICATION FORPERMISSION..][ FOR DISPOSAL ]

19.3 ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.2226/2018 in C.A. No.8788/2015IV

THE ABW MANESAR ALLOTEE WELFARE SOCIETYTHR. AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SANDEEPKUMAR SHARMA

RASHI BANSAL

VersusDR. NARHARI SINGH BANGAR, MANAGINGDIRECTOR HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL ANDINFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENTIN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,

19.4 ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.513/2020 in C.A. No.8788/2015IV

THE ABW MANESAR ALLOTTEE WELFARE SOCIETY RASHI BANSAL

VersusANURAG AGARWALIN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ONIA 75955/2020IA No. 75955/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

19.5 ConnectedMA 1521/2020 in C.A.No. 8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR AND ANR. RASHI BANSAL

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FORFOR impleading party ON IA 76602/2020FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA76602/2020FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA76605/2020IA No. 76605/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 76602/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

19.6 ConnectedDiary No. 7888-2020IV

RAMESHWAR AND ORS. GAURAV GOEL

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FORFOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA36484/2020FOR impleading party ON IA 36485/2020FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA36485/2020FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA36487/2020IA No. 89570/2020 - AMENDMENT IN CAUSETITLEIA No. 36484/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 36487/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 36485/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

19.7 ConnectedMA 864/2019 in C.A.No. 8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusSTATE OF HARYANAIN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FOR ADMISSION and IA No.68542/2019-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 68542/2019 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

19.8 ConnectedMA 1046/2019 in C.A.No. 8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR VINAY GARG

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAIN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,IA No. 73379/2019 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 73380/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

19.9 ConnectedMA 1175/2019 in C.A.No. 8788/2015IV

RAMESHWAR AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA FINANCIAL COMMISSIONERAND SECRATRY AND ORS. SHIVENDRA SINGH[IMPL],

RAMENDRA MOHANPATNAIK[IMPL], E. C.AGRAWALA[IMPL], AVIRALKASHYAP[IMPL]

IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,IA No. 82000/2020 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 93822/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

19.10

ConnectedDiary No. 24553-2019IV

RAMESHWAR AND ORS. HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA FINANCIALCOMMISSIONER SECRETARY AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FORFOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA102358/2019FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA189667/2019FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA62216/2020IA No. 62216/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 189667/2019 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 102358/2019 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

19.11

ConnectedDiary No. 45009-2019IV

RAMESHWAR AND ANR. SIDDHARTH BATRA, [IMPL]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA191983/2019FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA3403/2020FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA3406/2020FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA30807/2020IA No. 30807/2020 - APPLICATION FORPERMISSIONIA No. 191983/2019 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 3406/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 3403/2020 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

19.12

ConnectedDiary No. 45026-2019IV

RAMESHWAR AND ANR. SIDDHARTH BATRA, [IMPL]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA192027/2019IA No. 192027/2019 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

19.13

ConnectedDiary No. 23981-2020IV

RAMESHWAR AND ANR. NITIN BHARDWAJ

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IN C.A. No. - 8788/2015,IA No. 112515/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

NEW DELHI23-11-2020 13:24:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATNOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AFTER THE HEARING OF SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN THIS COURT AT10.30 A.M. IS OVER ]

MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[END OF THE BOARD]

20 SLP(C) No.7903-7906/2020XI-A

V N SADASIVAN PILLAI AND ORS. K.PARAMESHWAR

VersusJOINT SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND ORS.ETC. ETC.

BIJU P RAMAN[CAVEAT],[R-3], G. PRAKASH[R-1],[R-2], ALJO K. JOSEPH[R-4],K. RAJEEV[R-5]

[TO BE HEARD BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAYUMESH LALIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEVINEET SARAN]IA No. 89783/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 76975/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 93352/2020 - MODIFICATION OF COURTORDER

20.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No.8643-8646/2020XI-A

GANESAN P.V AND ORS. K.PARAMESHWAR

VersusJOINT SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

G. PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13],BIJU PRAMAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],[R-3], K.RAJEEV[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],[R-6]

20.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No.7942-7943/2020XI-A

C.V. GOVINDAN AND ANR. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusTHOMAS T.V. AND ORS. ETC. ETC. K. RAJEEV[CAVEAT], [R-1], G.

PRAKASH[R-7], [R-8], [R-9]FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA57104/2020

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 3 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)FOR EXEMPTION FROM PAYING COURT FEE ONIA 57105/2020IA No. 57104/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 57105/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM PAYINGCOURT FEE

20.3 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9956/2020XI-A

K. BUHARI AND ORS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A.

VersusTHOMAS T.V. AND ORS. K. RAJEEV[CAVEAT], BIJU P

RAMAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

NEW DELHI23-11-2020 13:24:46

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

1 Diary No. 16986-2020XVII-A

M/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusMAYUR SARAFIA No.112544/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.112549/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.112546/2020-STAYAPPLICATION

2 SLP(C) No. 13274/2020IV-B

SUDHIR MAHAJAN VINOD SHARMA

VersusTHE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS.{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.114171/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.114169/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

[FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES]

3 SLP(Crl) No. 7880/2019II

SHODAN SINGH AND ANR. M. P. SHORAWALA

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and IA No.132939/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

4 SLP(Crl) No. 4411/2020II

GANPAT RAJ MEHTA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGHBHATI

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHANFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.92521/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

5 Diary No. 17229-2020II-A

MANOJ KUMAR DIXIT KIRAN KUMAR PATRA

Versus

Page 40: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)THE STATE OF JHARKHANDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.93836/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.93837/2020-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING ORIGINALVAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT

6 SLP(Crl) No. 5056/2020II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL

VersusRAJUFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.106062/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

7 Diary No. 17342-2020II

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JASWANT SINGH RAWAT

VersusSURESH VERMAIA No.86367/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.86370/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IANo.86368/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

8 Diary No. 17386-2020II-C

JAYAMMA SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.IA No.94867/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

9 Diary No. 17458-2020II

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JASWANT SINGH RAWAT

VersusPRAKASH CHANDRAIA No.84139/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84140/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T.

10 SLP(Crl) No. 5244/2020II

RAKESH SINGH @ DABBU SHANTWANU SINGH

VersusSTATE OF U.P.IA No.109700/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.109701/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

11 SLP(Crl) No. 5311/2020II-A

SURESH UPADHYAY CORPORATE LEGALPARTNERS

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.110952/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.110954/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.andIA No.110958/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

12 SLP(Crl) No. 5203/2020II-A

ANIL ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA

Versus

Page 41: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHIA No.108725/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.108730/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

13 SLP(Crl) No. 5198/2020II-C

RAJESH CHOUDHARY SAHU MANISH KUMAR GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.108638/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.108640/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

[AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]

14 SLP(C) No. 22253/2017IX

MANGESH JAYWANT CHAVAN SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. CHIRAG M. SHROFF[R-2],

UDAY B. DUBE[R-3], [R-4],[R-5], VANDANASEHGAL[R-7]

{Mention Memo}IA No. 105283/2018 - PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS

14.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11538/2018IX

SHEETAL MANGESH CHAVAN S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOMEDEPARTMENT TH. SECRETARY AND ORS.

CHIRAG M. SHROFF[R-2],UDAY B. DUBE[R-3], [R-4],[R-5], VANDANASEHGAL[R-7]

{Mention Memo}

14.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13948/2018IX

JAGPAT RAJNATH PRAJAPATI S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBE[R-3], [R-4],

[R-5], VANDANASEHGAL[R-7]

{Mention Memo}

15 SLP(C) No. 23271/2019XI

BRAJESH KUMAR TEWARI PRAVEEN AGRAWAL

VersusJAISWAR AMAR NATH AND ORS. ATISHI DIPANKAR[R-1],

PAHLAD SINGHSHARMA[R-8]

{Mention Memo}IA No. 103375/2020 - EARLY HEARINGAPPLICATIONIA No. 141401/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

Page 42: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

NEW DELHI20-11-2020 21:45:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 43: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 24-11-2020Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

[DIRECTION MATTERS]

16 SLP(C) No. 18593/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANDSERVICE TAX JAIPUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ERICSSON INDIA PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[R-1][OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]

16.1 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23610/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANDSERVICE TAX JAIPUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ONIA 175872/2019IA No. 175872/2019 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE /APPLICATION

16.2 ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18596/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANDSERVICE TAX, JAIPUR I

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ERICSSON INDIA PVT. LTD.

17 C.A. No.9015-9020/2018XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusAVT NATURAL PRODUCTS LTD SIDDHARTHA JHA[R-1][OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]IA No. 114860/2018 - STAY APPLICATION

NEW DELHI20-11-2020 21:45:17

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 44: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 11. 24. · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment