supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if …supreme court of india [ it will be...

39
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019 COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 6053-6054/2014 IV-A M/S. I.C.D.S. LIMITED K. V. MOHAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS [ AT TOP ] 2 C.A. No. 5961/2009 III COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR Versus NIRMA LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER [ AT TOP ] 3 C.A. No. 3314/2011 XIV-A C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] Versus VODAFONE WEST LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON [ AT TOP ] 4 C.A. No. 7865/2009 XV SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT CO. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR [ AT TOP ] 5 C.A. No. 6417/2010 XIV-A HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FOREST CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1] Versus C.I.T SHIMLA ANIL KATIYAR[R-1] [ AT TOP ] Connected C.A. No. 6418/2010 XIV-A H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH Versus C.I.T,SHIMLA Connected C.A. No. 6421/2010 XIV-A H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1] Versus C.I.T,SHIMLA Connected C.A. No. 6419/2010 XIV-A H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH Versus C.I.T,SHIMLA 6 C.A. No. 7615/2009 XIV-A COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR Versus GUJARAT GUARDIAN LIMITED KAVITA JHA [ AT TOP ] Connected C.A. No. 2414/2010 XIV-A C.I.T., DELHI ANIL KATIYAR Versus

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.6053-6054/2014IV-A

M/S. I.C.D.S. LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]2 C.A. No. 5961/2009

IIICOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusNIRMA LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER[ AT TOP ]

3 C.A. No. 3314/2011XIV-A

C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusVODAFONE WEST LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[ AT TOP ]

4 C.A. No. 7865/2009XV

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT CO. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIAVersusINCOME TAX OFFICER B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

5 C.A. No. 6417/2010XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FORESTCORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1]

VersusC.I.T SHIMLA ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6418/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6421/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1]

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6419/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

6 C.A. No. 7615/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusGUJARAT GUARDIAN LIMITED KAVITA JHA[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2414/2010XIV-A

C.I.T., DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7M/S. SHYAM TELELINKS LTD. KAVITA JHA

7 C.A. No.2899-2902/2011XIV-A

M/S SHIV SHAKTI FLOUR MISSL (P)LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

8 C.A. No.8135-8146/2010IX

TATA MOTORS LTD. (FORMERLYKNOWN AS TATA ENGINEERING ANDLOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPALCORPORATION FORMED UNDER THEBOMBAY PROVINCIAL MUNICIPALCORPORATION

V. N. RAGHUPATHY

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No.8147-8152/2010IX

TATA MOTORS LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUN.CORP. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

9 C.A. No. 3826/2012IV-A

M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LTD. MANJEET KIRPALVersusC.I.T-II,JABALPUR ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

10 C.A. No.6112-6114/2011IV-A

M.P. RAJYA VAN VIKAS NIGAM LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][ AT TOP ]

11 C.A. No. 1961/2011IX

M/S ORIENT(GOA) PVT. LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

12 C.A. No.7566-7568/2012IV-A

M/S. BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No. 7569/2012IV-A

M/S ELECTREX (INDIA) LTD. K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedC.A. No. 7570/2012IV-A

M/S. UNITED GLASS BOTTLESMANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

13 C.A. No.3571-3572/2012XII

M/S MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD.THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR K J JOHN AND CO

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CIRCLE IV(1) AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

[ AT TOP ]

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.3573-3574/2012XII

M/S PRODAPT INFRASTRUCTUREHOLDNGS P LTD THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

K J JOHN AND CO

VersusASST.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX CIRCLEIV (1)CHENNAI AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

14 C.A. No. 9775/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DASVersusU.A.E.EXCHANGE CENTRE SAHARYA & CO.[ AT TOP ]

15 C.A. No. 2774/2012IV-A

M/S PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2777/2012IV-A

M/S PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS (P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2776/2012IV-A

M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2775/2012IV-A

M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

16 C.A. No. 5882/2011IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DASVersusKOLHAPUR ZILLA SAHAKARI DUDHUTPADAK SANGH LTD. RAUF RAHIM

[ AT TOP ]

17 C.A. No. 8937/2010IX

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI AND ANR. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusJAYANTILAL SHANTILAL JOBALI RASHMIKUMAR MANILAL VITHLANI[ AT TOP ]

18 C.A. No. 201/2005XI-A

PANKAJAKSHI(DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIRVersusCHANDRIKA . AND ORS. MALINI PODUVAL, M. T. GEORGE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8576/2014XI-A

PULPARAMBIL VASUDEVAN NARESH KUMAR

VersusNANGANADATH PULPARAMBILDEVADSAN AND ORS. VIJAY K. MEHTA, E. M. S. ANAM

19 C.A. No. 9863/2013III

VASUDEORAO@ DADASAHEBDESHPANDE(D)TH.LR& YASH PAL DHINGRA

VersusTULSABAI (D) TH. LR. . AND ORS. SUJATA KURDUKARMediation Report received

20 C.A. No. 3683/2007XII-A

M/S. USHAKIRON MOVIES PAREKH & CO.Versus

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3684/2007XII-A

M/S. USHAKIRON MOVIES PAREKH & CO.

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, A.P. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 13933/2015III

TATA SONS LIMITED AND ANR. SHIV KUMAR SURI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.5456-5459/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 8368/2018III

MAHYCO MONSANTO BIOTECH (INDIA )PVT LTD RAHUL GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-3], KUNALCHEEMA[R-2], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8347/2018III

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusMAHYCO MONSANTO BIOTECH (INDIA)PRIVATE LIMITED . AND ORS. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], KUNAL CHEEMA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8416/2018III-A

M/S DOMINOS PIZZA OVERSEASFRANCHISING BV THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. ACHALCHAWLA

KISHORE KUNAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8417/2018III-A

M/S DOMINOS PIZZA INTERNATIONALFRANCHISING BV THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. ACHALCHAWLA

KISHORE KUNAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5668/2017III-A

THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIALTAXES, U.P. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

VersusS/S KAMLA KANT AND CO. ANUBHA AGRAWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5641/2017III-A

THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIALTAXES U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusS/S KAMLA KANT AND CO. ANUBHA AGRAWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8348/2018III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SUBWAY SYSTEM INDIA PVT LTDAND ORS.

KHAITAN & CO.[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-5]

21 C.A. No. 2808/2013III-A

SANT PRASAD MISHRA AND ORS. ASHOK MATHURVersus

PUSHPRAJ SINGH AND ANR. PARIJAT SINHA, , RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-3], PRAMOD B. AGARWALA[R-3]

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 722 C.A. No. 437/2013

IVSURINDER SINGH (D) THR. LR. SANJAY JAINVersus

RAM PIARI AND ORS. AVINASH KR. LAKHANPAL[R-1], [R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[R-6]

23 C.A. No. 3274/2019XI-A

VARKEY MATHEW (DEAD) THR. LRS.AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO

Versus

TAHSILDAR DEVIKULAM . AND ORS.P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH[R-8]RAMESH BABU M. R., [INT], ASHWANIBHARDWAJ, [INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3275/2019XI-A

MANJU MATHEW AND ANR. ROMY CHACKO

VersusTAHSILDAR . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

24 C.A. No. 5649/2008IX

M/S COLFAX (I) PRIVATE LIMITED RAJESH KUMAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF GOA . AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI[R-1], JAYANT MOHAN[R-1],SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA[R-2]

25 C.A. No. 9591/2011XVI

M/S MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]VersusASST.COMMNR. COMMERCIAL TAXES .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9593/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9594/2011XVI

M/S. M.R.F. LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVISION AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9592/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT.COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

26 C.A. No.5534-5594/2011XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusGOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU AND ORS.MR. SIDDHARTH BHATNAGAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE TO APPEAR AS AMICUSCURIAE TO BE ASSISTED BY MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN, ADVOCATE.

27 C.A. No. 8512/2009XI-A

SPECIAL SEC. TO GOVT. OF ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]Versus

BANSIDHAR NAIK (DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS.

M. QAMARUDDIN[R-1]A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[IMPL], RAJEEVMAHESHWARANAND ROY[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], K. RAJEEV[I-3][IMPL], [I-4][IMPL],[I-5][IMPL], [I-6][IMPL], [I-7][IMPL]

FOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 86972/200928 C.A. No. 6076/2009

IV-ASHIVAKUMAR AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]Versus

SHARANABASAPPA AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], ANJANACHANDRASHEKAR[R-2], [R-4]

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

29 C.A. No. 4502/2009XI-A

ALL KERALA DISTRIBUTORSASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY

RANJITH K. C.[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], P. S.SUDHEER[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 878/2010XI-A

THE OTTAPPALAM TALUK PRIVATE BUSOPERATORS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], P. S.SUDHEER[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 879/2010XI-A

PALAKKAD DISTRICT LORRY OWNERSASSOCIATION AND ANR. AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEE[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], P. S.SUDHEER[R-3], ABHISTH KUMAR[R-1], [R-4],[R-5]

30 C.A. No.10680-10683/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURINGPVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, RADHA RANGASWAMY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10684/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURINGPVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],RADHA RANGASWAMY[R-4]

31 Crl.A. No.1431-1434/2010II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

Versus

SURINDER ETC. YASH PAL DHINGRA, RAVI KUMAR TOMAR,HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-1]

32 Crl.A. No. 2057/2009II-C

CHANNAPPA VITHOBHA BIRADAR NULI & NULI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

33 C.A. No. 4490/2008XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. ASSOCIATED CONTAINERTERMINAL LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

34 C.A. No. 1636/2010XVII

TATA MOTORS LTD.FORMERLY KNOWNAS M/S TATA ENGINEERING ANDLOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD.

MANIK KARANJAWALA

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAN(FOR.KNOWN.ASTHE STATE OF BIHAR) GOPAL PRASAD

35 C.A. No. 8128/2009IX

PATNUS GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANR. ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTATA POWER COMPANY LTD. . ANDORS. KARANJAWALA & CO.

36 C.A. No. 4380/2010III-A

INTIZAR AHMAD AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusPRESCRIBED AUTHORITY KAIRANA ANDANR. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

37 C.A. No. 6677/2008IV-A

WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJIVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7list C.A 7906/2009 alongwith these matter after two weeks as per order dated01.10.2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 2696/2010IV-A

WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9274/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7906/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S WIPRO FINANCE LIMITED ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2666/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/SCHILDRENS EDUCATION SOCIETY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

38 C.A. No. 3545/2009XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. HINGORANI & ASSOCIATESAS PER ROP DATED 03.10.2019, LIST THIS APPEAL AFTER 2 WEEKS.

39 C.A. No. 572-577/2009IX

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DISHTI INDUSTRIES LTD. . ANDORS. PRAVEEN KUMAR

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

40 Crl.A. No.2116-2117/2008II-B

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

VersusSIRAJUDDIN MAYUDDIN SAIYED ETC. SANJAY JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

41 C.A. No. 48/2009IV-A

ASIA SUGAR AND CHEMICAL CO.,DEVANGERE SANJEEV KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25469/2009IV-A

M/S INDIAN SUGAR AND GENERALEXPORTS IMPORT CORPORATIONLTD PAREKH & CO.[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

42 C.A. No. 6680/2009XVII

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESENIOR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGITA ENTERPRISES . AND ORS. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA, ANIL K. JHA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA1/2008 FOR ON IA 238/2009 FOR ON IA 8926/2013 FOR ON IA 67772/2013

43 Crl.A. No. 281/2009II-B

BASAB RAMBABU KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 954/2009II-B

BABU ROY AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 1856/2011IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MYSORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7M/S. R.P.G. CABLES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

45 C.A. No. 2416/2010IV

RAJ PAL SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXHARYANA B. V. BALARAM DAS

46 C.A. No. 4287/2011XIV-A

MADHU GAUR K. S. RANAVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, ANIL KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4292/2011XIV-A

M/S FIVE STAR TRADING ANDINVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED KRISHNA KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, SUSHMA SURI, SAHARYA &CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.4288-4289/2011XIV-A

M/S. MARVELOUS EXPORTS P.LTD. MONIKA GUSAIN

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, , ANIL KATIYAR, SAHARYA &CO.[R-5]

47 C.A. No.7308-7309/2010X

SHABIR HUSSAIN (D) BY LRS. P. NARASIMHAN

VersusKESHAV CHAND (D) BY LRS.

48 C.A. No.8592-8593/2010XII

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusV.MOHAN AND ANR. AND ANR. M. P. VINOD

49 C.A. No. 54/2009XIV-A

ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTERSOFTWARE EXPORT PROMOTIONCOUNCIL

SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

VersusCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS. ASHA JAIN MADAN

50 C.A. No. 4705/2014XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMOSER BAER INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4704/2014XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMOSER BAER INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 6267/2010XVI

SUBORNO BOSE DINESH CHANDRA PANDEY[P-1]VersusENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ANDANR ANIL KATIYAR

52 C.A. No. 1764/2010XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXUDAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHETAK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. RANI CHHABRA

53 C.A. No. 5184/2011XII

SARASWATHI (DEAD) BY LRS AND ORS.AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusS. A. PALANISAMY AND ORS. AND ORS. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

54 C.A. No. 4088/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMITED KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 4089/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIOSNER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

55 C.A. No. 8589/2010III

ADDL.DIR.OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT B. V. BALARAM DASVersusSUVIDHA ASSOCIATION THR.ITSPRESIDENT BHARGAVA V. DESAI

56 C.A. No. 6486/2009IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusTHE NEW FRIENDS COOPERATIVEHOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD UDITA SINGH[R-1]

57 C.A. No. 7389/2009XVII

PROJECT OFFICER,U.O.C.C.OFM/S.COAL.LTD. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND . AND ORS. RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

58 C.A. No. 32/2010III-A

SUBEY RAM RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-4]

59 C.A. No. 4831/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCELLIMITED)

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.5989-5990/2012IV-A

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .ETC M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8512/2012IV-A

M/S MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

FOR [APPLICATION FOR DE TAGGING] ON IA 4/2016ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17947/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 7613/2014III

JABIL CIRCUIT INDIA PVT. LTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE-III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3347/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.9201-9202/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S. MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 5376/2016XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. SURANA TELECOMAND POWER LTD.) THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRE

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5368/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.)

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5369/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.) THORUGH ITS MANAGINDIRECTOR

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, GOA.

ConnectedC.A. No.11078-11083/2018XVII-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 17260/2019ConnectedC.A. No. 5863/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOM LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSBANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.110020/2019-STAY APPLICATIONConnectedC.A. No. 5860/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOMS LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE BANGALORE IFOR ADMISSION and IA No.109914/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

60 C.A. No. 6551/2010XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusM/S. GILLETE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALA[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4006/2011X

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD. THR. ITS SENIORMANAGER AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO, RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-2]

61 C.A. No. 10458/2010IV-A

IQBAL AHMED AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[P-1]VersusABDUL SHUKOOR MD. FARMAN[R-1]

62 C.A. No. 1353/2010IV

MOHAN RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusRATTAN SINGH PREETI SINGH[R-1]

63 C.A. No. 7412/2009IV-A

SYED ALI AHMAD HUSSAINI AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDEVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 764 C.A. No.

10509-10510/2013XVI

BIDYUT SARKAR AND ANR. SHIPRA GHOSE

VersusKANCHILAL PAL AND ANR. BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH

65 C.A. No. 1303/2010IV-A

S.V.GURURAJ NANDA KISHOREVersusK.G.SRINATH PRABHU . AND ORS.

66 C.A. No. 7561/2009III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIESLTD.(FOILS DIVISION) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 5205/2013III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.& CUS.THANE-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PLUSPACK CONTAINERS(P) LTD. M. P. DEVANATH{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No.7552-7555/2013XVII-A

CCE JAIPUR-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

S.R. FOIL AND TISSUES LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS R.S. HYGIENEPVT. LTD.) AND ORS.

M. P. DEVANATH

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }67 C.A. No. 8426/2011

XVIIJHARKHAND STATE ELECT.BAORD HIMANSHU SHEKHARVersusM/S.STAN COMMODITIES PVT.LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

68 C.A. No.6033-6035/2009III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No.10825-10826/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No. 5714/2011III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AND SER TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

69 C.A. No.6228-6229/2009IX

C.C.E.,MUMBAI, THANE-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.CONWOOD PRE-FAB PVT.LTD. THR.ITS. M.D. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

70 C.A. No. 8829/2010XVII

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]

VersusCANTONMENT BOARD,RAMGARHCANTONM.. AND ORS. MADHURIMA TATIA[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ON IA 70392/2009 FOR ON IA 61341/201071 Crl.A. No. 319/2011

II-ARAM SEVAK MODI SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

72 C.A. No. 1599/2011IX

PRABHAT GEN.AGENCIES AND ORS..AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

THE JAMMU AND KASMIR BANK LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJENDER PD. SAXENA, VIKAS SINGHJANGRA, PAREKH & CO., MAHESHTHAKUR[R-5]

73 C.A. No.3852-3853/2017XI-A

A.M.PADMINI AMMA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

V.P.MURALEEDHARAN . AND ORS.VIPIN NAIR[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.,SURESHAN P., SUBHASISH BHOWMICK, P. V.DINESH, ABHIJEET SINHA

74 C.A. No. 3961/2010XVI

TRILOKI NATH SINGH S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersusANIRUDH SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

75 C.A. No.6401-6403/2010XIV-A

D.D.A. SAHARYA & CO.

VersusM/S. PRIDE CONSTRUCTIONS JAGDISH KUMAR CHAWLA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

76 C.A. No.6262-6263/2011XVI

MAURYA REALTORS PVT.LTD. RANI CHHABRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

77 C.A. No. 9546/2010IV-A

ASHA JOHN DIVIANATHAN S. NARAIN & CO.VersusVIKRAM MALHOTRA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

78 C.A. No. 494-495/2016XVI

SMT. PREMLATA DEVI AND ORS. UJJAL BANERJEE[P-1]Versus

RADHA DEVI(D) BY LRS. AND ORS.T. MAHIPAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

79 C.A. No.3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

80 C.A. No. 9643/2013XII

B. RAJAM AMMAL (D) BY LRS. K. K. MANIVersusLAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK ANDORS. AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2][GR]

81 C.A. No. 1957/2011XII-A

NASEEM KAHNAM AND ORS. PRABHA SWAMIVersusZAHEDA BEGUM (D) BY LR. AND ORS. ANU GUPTA, S. MAHENDRAN

82 C.A. No. 7923/2013XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusCOLLECTOR LAQ BUDGAM COLLECTORAND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM, D. MAHESH BABU[R-2],[R-3], [R-6]

83 C.A. No. 3548/2017XIV-A

M/S K.P.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIKVersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3554/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3549/2017XIV-A

M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN LTD .AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3551/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3552/2017XIV-A

SANJIB KAKATY R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO. LTD. ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556/2017XIV-A

M/S MOTLIB ALI SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3560/2017XIV-A

M/S. JAY KUMAR JAIN SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3558/2017XIV-A

M/S D.P.AGARWALA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3550/2017XIV-A

DIPAK NATH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3553/2017XIV-A

M/S PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT PROP.SHRI PURANJOY BARUAH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3555/2017XIV-A

M/S K.C.CHHAWACHARTYA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3561/2017XIV-A

M/S. SHIV KUMAR AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3562/2017XIV-A

M/S P.M.AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

Versus

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3564/2017XIV-A

M/S B.K.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3563/2017XIV-A

M/S DIPAK NATH SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3559/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3557/2017XIV-A

M/S ECOS ENGINEERS SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3565/2017XIV-A

PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.3566-3569/2017XIV-A

GHANA GOGOI AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2017XIV-A

M/S. N.K.SHARMA AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, SHUVODEEPROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPSOC.LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD. ANDORS. PRERNA MEHTA, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2017XIV-A

M/S JYOTI PRASAD BORGOHAINTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. JYOTIPRASAD BORGOHAIN (DEAD) TH. LRS.AND ORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN.LTD.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7954/2012XIV-A

M/S SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2012XIV-A

M/S J.K JAIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2017XIV-A

M/S BISWAJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3575/2017XIV-A

M/S. PROSENJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP, SHUVODEEP ROY,KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3574/2017XIV-A

M/S. RANAJIT BHUYAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3577/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEYCONSTRUCTION AND SUUPLIERSREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRIMRIDUL KUMAR ADH

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMEN AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8705/2012XIV-A

M/S DIPAK MECH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3576/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY CONST.AND SUPPLIERS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY, KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3579/2017XIV-A

MRIDUL KUMAR ADHYAPAK RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2012XIV-A

M/S. R.P. KAKOTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAMAND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3578/2017XIV-A

M/S PURANA AMULAPATTY JUBAKSOMABAI SAMITY LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8693/2012XIV-A

M/S ROBIN BORDOLOI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4658/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 9291/2012XIV-A

M/S. P.K.AGARWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2012XIV-A

M/S. D.P AGARWAL MOHAN PANDEY, [P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C. LTD. AND ORS.KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-4], [R-5], SHUVODEEPROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4657/2013XIV-A

M/S ALI BROTHERS ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4659/2013XIV-A

MOTILIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR EASTERN REGION ONGCNAZIRA AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4662/2013XIV-A

MOTLIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4661/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4660/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 3580/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S ALI BROTHERS AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

84 C.A. No. 8821/2011IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersusNATIONAL ORGANIC CHEMICALINDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.

85 C.A. No. 6222/2014XII

SELVRAJ @ URKAVALAN G. BALAJIVersusALAGAR AND ANR. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

86 C.A. No. 5345/2013III-A

M/S SHEETALA BARA LALAPURCHANDMORI AND ANR. YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

ARUN K. SINHA[R-3], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

87 C.A. No. 614/2013III-A

M/S PRATAP PHARMACEUTICALS AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SECRETARYFINANCE CIVIL SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

88 C.A. No. 3597/2012XIV-A

KUNTI DEVI BIMAL ROY JADVersusDEEP KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2], [R-3]

89 C.A. No.8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-1][PR], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[CAVEAT]and IA No.120464/2017-IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD ALONG WITHAFFIDAVIT and IA No.120470/2017-IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALDEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER NO 2 and IA No.120473/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IA No.120477/2017-IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENTAGAINST THE DECEASED and IA No.120479/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING(Case is to be listed alongwith CA 8075-8076/2010)

90 Crl.A. No. 10/2011II-B

HARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

91 C.A. No. 8826/2011IV-A

GURAPPA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICERList before court/bench [in its own turn]

92 C.A. No. 1958/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusANU MEHRA MOHINDER JIT SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11426/2012XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusVIKAS JAIN AND ANR.

93 C.A. No.10159-10161/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AHMEDABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S URMIN PRODUCTS P.LTD. . ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 5146/2015XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. FLAKES-N-FLAVOURZ M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 959/2019XVII-A

C.CE S.T. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTARA CHAND NARESH CHAND RAJAT MITTAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.170411/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.170409/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6938-2019XVII-A

C.C.E AND S.T. JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A.M PRODUCTS AJAY CHOUDHARY[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41836/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.41835/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 14581-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MEERUT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOM PAN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD M. P. VINOD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84500/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84501/2019-STAY APPLICATION

94 C.A. No.10180-10181/2010XII-A

RAMANAVARAPU SAMPATH KUMAR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPIDIKITI VENKATARATNAM (D) BY LRS. DUA ASSOCIATES[CAVEAT], SATYA MITRA

95 C.A. No. 6515/2012IV

M/S. KARNAL MILK FOODS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[INT]

IA No.67821/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONLY IN C.A. NO. 6515 OF 2012and IA No.89861/2017-XTRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6522/2012IV

M/S. BHARAT DAIRY UDYOG AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6520/2012IV

M/S. DAILY FOODS (INDIA) AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA ANIMALHUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6525/2012IV

M/S. KWALITY DAIRY INDIA LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6530/2012IV

M/S.G.K.DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTSPVT. LTD AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6523/2012IV

M/S STERLING AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH, R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6524/2012IV

M/S MODERN DAIRIES LTD. AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], M. P.DEVANATH[P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 6528/2012IV

M/S. SMRITI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6527/2012IV

M/S HARYANA MILK FOODS LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6518/2012IV

M/S GOLDMINE MILKFOOD .LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6519/2012IV

KMG MILK FOOD LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11193/2014IV

M/S MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

96 C.A. No. 5593/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA

Versus

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN,[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5594/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANUVRAT SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAVINDRA KUMAR, [R-5]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.267/2011 In C.A. No.5593/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

D.AGGARWAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10262/2016XI

AJEET SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P ANUVRAT SHARMA

97 C.A. No. 8777/2012IX

MAHADEO BALIRAM NAWALKAR(DEAD)THROUGH LRS. NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

Versus

AMBADAS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

98 C.A. No. 7238/2011XIV-A

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

99 C.A. No. 1392/2011XI-A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

100 C.A. No. 9485/2013XI-A

VELAYUDHAN NADAR NARAYAN NADAR SUMITA HAZARIKAVersusB.K.THANKAPPAN AND ORS. M. P. VINOD

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7101 C.A. No. 10215/2011

IV-ASHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 6667/2013XII-A

PYLA DEMUDAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusCHEEPURUPALLI CHANDRAMMA ANDORS. AND ORS.

M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

IA No.89692/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and103 C.A. No. 886-887/2016

IV-ASHARANABASAPPA LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusNAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22517/2011IV-A

NAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSHARANABASAPPA . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

104 C.A. No. 6380/2012III

KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL HEIRS OFDECEASED AMBALAL P. PATELTHROUGH ATTORNEY RAJESHBHAIRAMANBHAI PAT AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15], [P-16], [P-17],[P-18], [P-19]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT REVENUEDEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARYAND ANR.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 and IANo.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

106 C.A. No.12048-12049/2018IV-A

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHAAND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS./ALLAMDODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ABDUL AZEEMKALEBUDDE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.12050-12053/2018IV-A

ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. .ETC .ETC ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

VersusSINGAMASETTY VENKATARAMAIAH .AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

107 Crl.A. No. 627/2012II-C

MUTHU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2012II-C

RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS.T. HARISH KUMAR[P-2], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SURESHAN P.[P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]FOR 10.12.2019 AS DAILY BOARD MATTER

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7108 C.A. No.

8220-8221/2012IX

MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. .AND ANR. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI

109 Crl.A. No. 818/2014II

NARAYAN DUTT JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

110 C.A. No.7825-7828/2013XII

V.N.A.S.CHANDRAN ZOHEB HOSSAIN[P-1][PR]

Versus

MRS. S. VENILLA AND ORS. AND ORS. ARAVINDH S.[R-1], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-2],[R-2], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]

111 Crl.A. No. 1856/2012II-C

RAJRANI ARJUN GARGVersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW STATE OFCHHATISGARH) PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 2614/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusTEXMACO LIMITED . AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

113 C.A. No. 928/2016IV-A

RAMKALI SONI AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusMUKTA SONI AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

114 C.A. No. 2920/2014IV

SATYA PAL SHARMA AND ANR. ROHIT KUMAR SINGHVersusASHA VERMA (D) THR. LRS. PIYUSH SHARMA

115 C.A. No.3405-3407/2012III

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAXRAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. NIKHIL JAIN[R-1]

116 Crl.A. No.1358-1359/2012II-B

SUBRAN ANKUR S. KULKARNI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, [R-1]

117 C.A. No.4670-4671/2012XII-A

DASTGIR AHMED VADIVELU DEENADAYALAN[P-1]

VersusKHAIRUNNISA RAHANA AND ANR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

118 Crl.A. No. 794/2013II-B

BHAG SINGH J. P. DHANDA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

119 C.A. No.7791-7796/2013III

KALUBHAI KHATUBHAI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

120 C.A. No. 7283/2012IV-A

M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE . AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.5066-5073/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHREE RENUKA SUGAR LTD. ETC.ETC.

KUSH CHATURVEDIHARISH PANDEY[INT]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7121 C.A. No. 4750/2013

III-ASTATE OF U.P. AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusTEJPAL SINGH CHAUHAN (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

122 C.A. No. 8903/2012XIV-A

BISHAN DEVI (D) TR. LRS. MOHIT D. RAMVersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANDORS.

SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8904/2012XIV-A

M/S GUPTA MACHINE TOOLS LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5538/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusHARSH GUPTA . AND ORS. MOHIT D. RAM, ATUL KUMAR

123 C.A. No. 9145/2012XIV-A

NARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

124 Crl.A. No. 1594/2013II

KALAWATI AND ANR. TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OFUTTARAKHAND) KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1595/2013II

MANVENDRA SINGH TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FARRUKH RASHEED[R-1][GR]UID FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 58393/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATIONON IA 104936/2018

125 Crl.A. No. 762/2015II

IRFAN S. S. NEHRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]IA No.108849/2017 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IA No.108852/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. IA No.18562/2015 APPLN. U/S 7A OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACTETC. IA No.18563/2015 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

126 Crl.A. No. 1348/2014II

NITYA NAND P. K. JAIN[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]MANJU JETLEY[IMPL]

127 C.A. No. 1966/2013IV-A

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]Versus

B.R MURALIDHAR AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-2], PRITHASRIKUMAR[R-3], LAWYER S KNIT & CO[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18942/2013IV-A

M/S CHANDRA SPINNING ANDWEAVING MILLS PVT. LTD. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, JOSEPH ARISTOTLES.[R-3]

128 Crl.A. No. 257/2013II-A

FIROZ KHAN AKBARKHAN VIPIN KUMAR JAI[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

129 C.A. No. 6859/2014IV-A

PARVATHI NAIRTHI AND ORS. BINA GUPTAVersusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1.3], [R-1.2]

130 C.A. No. 3312/2015XII-A

GUNDLURI GOVINDA REDDY SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersusMALLU VENKATARAMANA REDDY ANDORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[CAVEAT]

131 Crl.A. No. 2206/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusLAXMAN AND ORS.

132 C.A. No.14053-14054/2015XII

S. SHIVAKUMAR PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusS. VALLIKANNU @ VALLIAMMAL ANDORS S. MAHENDRAN

133 Crl.A. No. 549/2015II-B

RAJINDER SINGH @ RAVINDER SINGH VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

134 Crl.A. No. 1320/2014II-A

KISHORE SHANKAR PATIL ADITYA SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

135 Crl.A. No. 1529/2014II-A

HARJITSINGH RAJ KAMALVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1539/2014II-A

RAMAKANT RAMRAO DENGALE ANDANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1530/2014II-A

TUKARAM V. K. SIDHARTHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1541-1544/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SHIVAJIRAO THORAT ANDANR. UDAY B. DUBE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1531/2014II-A

ABA @ DNYANDEO TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1545-1547/2014II-A

ABDUL HAQ FAKIR MOHAMMADKURESHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1534/2014II-A

HARDIK SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1533/2014II-A

BALKISAN SUDHA GUPTA

Versus

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1532/2014II-A

RUCHIN SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS ON IA 114874/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2014II-A

AJAY AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1535/2014II-A

VASANT ASTHA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1536/2014II-A

RAGHUNATH RAMNATH ZOLEKAR KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1540/2014II-A

AKASH SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1548/2014II-A

CHETAN RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2161-2164/2014II-A

ASHOK ARVIND S. AVHAD[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.705-706/2015II-A

VILAS SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

136 C.A. No.9228-9231/2013XII

LAKSHMI MOHAN AND ANR. SHAKUN SHARMA

VersusM/S. AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD. AND ANR.

V. BALACHANDRAN[CAVEAT], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.1441-1446/2014XII

M/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENG. PVT LTD V. BALACHANDRAN, [CAVEAT]

Versus

LAKSHMI MOHAN & ORS SHAKUN SHARMA, M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-3]

ConnectedDiary No. 31322-2018XII

THE CHIEF MANAGER ANDAUTHORIZED OFFICER M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusM/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.136132/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

137 C.A. No.5667-5668/2014IV-A

M LAKSHMANA RAO AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

Versus

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7S NARAYANA RAO AND ORS. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

138 C.A. No. 455/2015III-A

JAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

139 Crl.A. No. 386/2015II

UMED SINGH . AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

140 Crl.A. No. 1304/2014II-C

JAGA ALIAS JAGDISH S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2423/2014II-C

H.R.GANESH RAJESH SRIVASTAVA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

141 C.A. No. 35/2019XIV-A

HAROLI BLOCK INDUSTRIESASSOCIATION DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4], ANIL KATIYAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 36-38/2019XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH VYAPAR MANDAL SIDDHARTH SINGLA[P-1], SANTOSHKRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6], MANSOORALI[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 39/2019XIV-A

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], MANSOOR ALI[R-5]KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 40/2019XIV-A

RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 43/2019XIV-A

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 44-46/2019XIV-A

INDIAN CONFECTIONERYMANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION DUA ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 41-42/2019XIV-A

BRANDED EDIBLE OIL MANUFACTURESASSOCIATION AND ANR. DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

Versus

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-9], [R-10], ANILKATIYAR[R-7], [R-11]

142 C.A. No. 15098/2017XIV-A

M/S AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusMAHESH UDYOG MANAGED BY M/SSHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7143 C.A. No. 6451/2019

XI-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusINSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES NISHE RAJEN SHONKER{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ WITHIN FIRST FIVE MATTERS OF THELIST ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6460/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA DEPT. OF REVENUESECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCEAND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK PARALLEL{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6452/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE SECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusST. THOMAS COLLEGE AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE[R-3]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6457/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusP.V MANOJ KUMAR P. GEORGE GIRI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6456/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGEORGIAN COLLEGE, ARUVITHURA .AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6462/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA PARALLEL COLLEGES ASSO. .AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6454/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusK. RAMAKRISHNAN . AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6458/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMALAPPURAM DIST. PARALLELCOL.ASSO AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6453/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusST.ANTONYS EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE SOCIETY P. GEORGE GIRI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6455/2019XI-A

UOI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTOM T. JOSEPH{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6461/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusK.V. VELAYUDHAN AND ORS.

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6469/2019XI-A

UOI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S KOLLAM DIST. PARALLEL COLLEGEASSOCIATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6459/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAHATAMA COLLEGE AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6463/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE KASARAGOD DIST. PARALLELCOLLEGE ASSOCIATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6695/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

PERAYAM SUBASH AND ORS. JAMES P. THOMAS[R-9], [R-10], [R-14], [R-17],[R-33], [R-40], [R-42], [R-48]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6468/2019XI-A

SUPERINT.OF C.E.KANHANGAD RANGE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCALICUT EDU.TRUST KOZHODIE EMASCOMPLEX{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6471/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTOMY M.A. AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6467/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWOMENS ACADEMY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6465/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKANNUR DISTRICT PARELLEL COLLGEASSOCIATION . AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6464/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE PALAKKAD COOPERATIVE ARTSAND ANR. M. T. GEORGE

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6466/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCHINMAYA MISSION COLLEGE SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 6470/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNAJEEB K AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6472/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE PRABHATH COLLEGE TRUST . ANDANR. E. M. S. ANAM

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6473/2019XI-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISESERVICE TAX AND CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S TANDEM INTEGRATED SERVICES A. KARTHIK[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No.8386-8391/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX CHANDIGARH II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SWIFT FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCHAND EDUCATION SOCIETY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } IA No.148743/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING and IA No.148742/2019-STAY APPLICATION

144 C.A. No.6325-6326/2015XII-A

AKELLA LALITHA SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA

VersusKONDA HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR.

145 C.A. No. 1986/2019IV

RAM PIARI(D)THR. LRS AND ANR. VIVEK GUPTAVersusSUKHDEVI(D)THR. HER LRS AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ PART-HEARD BY : HON. A.M.KHANWILKAR AND HON. DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ. ]

146 Crl.A. No. 531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ANR.

GEETHA KOVILAN[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-3]

147 Crl.A. No. 521/2015II-A

SURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

148 C.A. No. 9253/2017III

MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD(NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITSLIMITED)

KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

149 C.A. No. 9725/2014IV-A

M/S. MARUTI ISPAT AND ENERGY PVTLTD.Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]VIKAS MEHTA[INT], RANJAN KUMAR[P-1],[INT], E. C. AGRAWALA[INT]

IA No.140166/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.21230/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.10355-10357/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10497/2014IV-A

DAVANGERE SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 523/2015IV-A

HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKAREKARKHANE NIYAMIT M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGLORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9271/2014IV-A

M/S ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10299/2014IV-A

DECCAN CEMENTS LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMIISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 429/2015IV-A

M/S AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVTLTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 7/2015IV-A

TOPWORTH STEEL AND POWERPVT.LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISIONER OF CUSTOMS,VISHAKAPATNAM AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 430-432/2015IV-A

M/S SWASTIK COAL CORP. PVT LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3131/2015IV-A

M/S. KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3769/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S DEVANGERE SUGAR COMPANYLTD. MEERA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.5999-6000/2015III

M/S. WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5722-5723/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE CUSETC. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSWASTIK COAL CORPORATION PVT.LTD. ETC. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2638/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5877/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.8916-8917/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

ZUARI CEMENT LTD AND ANR. MEERA MATHUR[R-1], CHARANYALAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3118/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVIJAYAWADA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSHREE JAYAJOTHI CEMENTS LTD RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2016IV-A

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDSERVICE TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedDiary No. 9241-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSKANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ORIENT ABRASIVES LTD.IA No.78833/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.78836/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.78835/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.78834/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 12289-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSJAMNAGAR (PREV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AQUAGEL CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.IA No.73729/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.73728/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.73727/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

150 C.A. No. 10292/2014IV-A

VIBGYOR SCHOOL, N S PALYA AND ORS. M. RAMBABU AND CO.VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10293/2014IV-A

CHRIST SCHOOL (ICSE) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10294/2014IV-A

ST. MIRAS SCHOOL PRABHA SWAMI

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedSLP(C) No.21715-21717/2018III

RAJKOT KELAVANI SAMAJ (ST. MARYENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL MORBI )THROUGH PRINCIPAL DAVIS MANJALY

GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22396/2018III

AYYAPPA EDUCATION CENTRE(SABARIVIDYALAYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116654/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155917/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23243-23244/2018III

JAMNAGAR EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA120296/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155937/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23035/2018III

STELLA MARIS TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 156008/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.22368-22370/2018III

MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX SYRIANCHURCH BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116486/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155959/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23227/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 155870/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23037/2018III

BASIL TRUST BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118805/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155895/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23173-23174/2018III

SACHIDANANAD VIDYALAYA TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119734/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30083-2018III

ASHADHAMSEVA MANDAL VAPI (ST.XAVIERS SCHOOL KHILODA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118455/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118459/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30108-2018III

MATRU JYOTHI EDUCATIONALTRUST(SCHOOL JAM KAMABALIYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118749/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118750/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30117-2018III

ST. ANNES HIGH SCHOOL TRUST (STANNES SCHOOL NADIAD) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 116907/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30122-2018III

THE PROVINCIAL SOCIETY OF THECONGREGATION OF JESUS AND MARY(CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARY GIRLSSCHOOL

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118759/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118760/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30160-2018III

AUXILIUM SOCIETY (AUXILIUMCONVENT SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118761/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118762/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155970/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30164-2018III

DAKOR SALESIAN SOCIETY (DONBOSCO ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118499/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118500/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22983/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ANR. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118414/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30413-2018III

DIVINE CHILD SEVA KENDRA AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 119622/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119627/2018

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 581/2019X

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

151 Crl.A. No. 2555/2014II-C

ATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

152 C.A. No. 6282/2015XII

THE STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTIONCORP. OF TAMIL NADU LTD SUDARSH MENON

VersusT. H. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER, GARIMA PRASHAD

153 Crl.A. No. 1265/2015II

RAM BETI C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[R-1]

154 Crl.A. No. 1962/2017II-A

M/S. KITPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], AMIT K. NAIN[R-2],ASHISH RANA[R-3]

155 Crl.A. No. 1683/2017II-C

SURESHA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI, [R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1684/2017II-C

PRABHUSWAMY RAJESH MAHALE

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S., , MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

156 C.A. No. 372/2018IV

M/S. ALPHA G. CORP. DEVELOPMENTPVT. LTD. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION AMRITSARAND ORS. P. N. PURI[R-1]

157 C.A. No.5094-5098/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, DAMAN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELLKNOWN SYNTHETICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER

RAHUL GUPTA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 820-823/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS & SRVICE TAX, VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHILOSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 9/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 88605/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.9214-9235/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT - I, (GUJRAT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 45/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7240/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.1111-1117/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BEEKALYON SYNTHERICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 15/2016

158 C.A. No.9269-9275/2017III

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusB.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LIMITED AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

K. R. SASIPRABHU[CAVEAT], HARISHPANDEY[CAVEAT], JURIS CORP.[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9264/2017III

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD THRU ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU, [CAVEAT]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No.9265-9268/2017III

B.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No. 11114/2017III

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONAND ANR. JURIS CORP.[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.51744/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

159 Crl.A. No. 1418/2015II-A

TALASHO DEVI @ TARAWATI DEVI SUBHRO SANYALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

160 C.A. No. 14622/2015XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusRAM GOPAL AGARWALA . AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14623/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

VersusBRC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 39165/2019161 Crl.A. No. 1067/2017

IIHANSRAJ LAXMIDAS MERCHANT P. V. DINESH[P-1]VersusRAJESH RATHI AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2]

162 C.A. No. 720-722/2019XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMADVersusJ.K. TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDFORMERLY KNOWN AS J.K. INDUSTRIESLIMITED

G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

163 C.A. No.23986-23987/2017IV

SUSHIL KUMAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTAPTESH KAUR @ TAAPTESH KAURAND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7

164 Crl.A. No. 588/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN D.S.K. LEGAL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 589/2016II-A

FIROZ SHAIKH AND ANR. VIPIN NAIR

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN . AND ANR. D.S.K. LEGAL

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 48/2016PIL-W

PT. PARMANAND KATARA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

165 Crl.A. No. 529/2016II-B

MAKVANA DAMJIBHAI LAKHMANBHAI RAUF RAHIMVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED22.02.2019 THE CRIMINAL APPEAL BE POSTED FOR FINAL HEARING IN THETHIRD WEEK OF NOVEMBER, 2019.

166 C.A. No. 10020/2017IV

SEEMA DAHIYA AND ANR. GAUR & NEHRA LAW FIRM[P-1]Versus

COL. DHARAMPAL (RETD.) AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR[R-1][PR], HARSH V.SURANA[R-2][PR]

and IA No.128745/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128746/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129743/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR ON IA 1/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 3/2017

167 C.A. No. 5957/2016XVI

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXBHUBANESWAR II

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

168 Crl.A. No. 230/2017II-A

KAMLESH PRASAD FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], DEBASISMISRA[R-2]

and IA No.88981/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

169 C.A. No. 1317/2017III-A

M/S. GANGOTRI SAHKARI AVAS SAMITILTD. VINAY GARG

VersusM/S. PUSHPA SAHKARI AVAS SAMITILTD. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH

170 Crl.A. No. 901/2016II-B

MAINUDDIN GAZI SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

171 C.A. No. 8202/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL COMMUNICATION PVT LTDTHR. FINANCIAL ADVISOR

ConnectedDiary No. 9270-2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI-IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL INDUSTRIESIA No.42446/2017-STAY APPLICATION

172 C.A. No. 20903/2017XIV-A

MANOJ CHATURVEDIVersus

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7SANGEETA CHATURVEDI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

173 Crl.A. No.592-593/2017II-C

SRI M. H. SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

174 C.A. No.10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

175 Crl.A. No. 60-63/2017II-A

HIRA MANDAL ANIL K. CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

176 Crl.A. No. 281/2017II

KAILASH CHANDRA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

177 C.A. No. 1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15149/2017IV-A

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1], [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

178 C.A. No. 6077/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER

VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ADVOCATE ABHAY KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ABHAY KUMAR

179 C.A. No. 3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][GR], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][GR], RAM NARESHYADAV[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

180 C.A. No. 19652/2017XIV-A

PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ADITYA VERMAVersusKAVERI SEED COMPANY LIMITED ANDOTHERS RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT]

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.19653-19654/2017XIV-A

REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LIMITED ANDORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3]

IA No.53223/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.53227/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

181 C.A. No. 7269/2018XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAMVersusTHE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATEACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ANDORS.

SATYA MITRA[R-1], [R-2]

182 C.A. No. 3021/2019XV

BRIJ BIHARI AGARWAL (BHAGAT) ANDANR. SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusSUNIL CHAND KOTHARI B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]

183 C.A. No. 454/2018III

NABABAI DEVCHAND SHINDE AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

184 Crl.A. No. 660/2019II-A

ARUN KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-2]

185 C.A. No. 10329/2018III

INDUS TOWER LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHARVersus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], [R-5], HEMANTIKAWAHI[R-1], [R-3], [R-4]

186 C.A. No. 2374/2019III

M/S FEDERAL BANK PALLAVI PRATAPVersus

JYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS.S. R. SETIA[CAVEAT], ANURADHAMUTATKAR[R-4], ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-6], K J JOHN AND CO[R-7]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.36551/2019-EX-PARTE STAYTO BE TAKEN UP AFTER CA NO. 3241/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 3291/2019III

KISHORE J JANANI ANURADHA MUTATKAR[P-1]

VersusJYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-6]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2019III

JYOTI H MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[P-1]

Versus

KISHORE J. JANANI AND ORS.ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1], PALLAVIPRATAP[R-2], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-4], KJ JOHN AND CO[R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.110798/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.110800/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.110801/2019-PERMISSION TOFILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

187 Crl.A. No. 703/2019II-A

SADHU DAS RAKESH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

188 C.A. No. 1161/2006IV

RAN SINGH (D) BY LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusKESHAR BAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. SHALU SHARMAMATTER RESTORED VIDE ORDER DATED 23.08.2019 PASSED IN M.A. NO.1673/2019.

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7189 Crl.A. No. 1587/2008

IIBIRBAL NATH P. D. SHARMAVersus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR, RISHI MATOLIYA[R-3][PR],[R-4][PR], [R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1588/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]

VersusJETH NATH @ JETHU NATH . AND ORS.

190 C.A. No. 8308/2010XI-A

VOLTAS LIMITED K J JOHN AND CO[P-1]VersusSTATE OF ORISSA KIRTI RENU MISHRA[R-1]

191 Crl.A. No. 1894/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersus

MEH RAM AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[R-1][PR],[R-2][PR], [R-4][PR], [R-5][PR]

192 C.A. No. 7157/2008XVII-A

M/S.L.R.BROTHERS,INDO FLORA LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCOMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

193 C.A. No. 1854/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ,MIN.OF FIN.AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSAMALPATHI POWER COMPANY P LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.1859-1860/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGMR POWER CORP. (P) LTD. AND ORS.ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT I.VENKAARAMANA AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA, B. BALAJI

ConnectedC.A. No. 1858/2009XII

THE DY. COMM. OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusMADURAI POWER CORP. P. LTD. ANDORS. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1], VINODHKANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

194 Crl.A. No. 1033/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]Versus

RAJDHAR SINGH . AND ORS. MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

195 Crl.A. No. 2151/2010II-A

SOU. DHONDABAI BALKRISHNACHINCHANE RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

196 C.A. No.2360-2376/2009XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S D.L.STEELS THROUGH ITSMANAGER RUPESH KUMAR

197 C.A. No.8051-8054/2009X

PERFETTI VAN MELLE INDIA PVT.LTD. DUA ASSOCIATES

VersusCOMMISSIONER, TRADETAX/COMMERCIAL TAX JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

198 C.A. No. 1000/2012XI-A

RAMAN NAMBOODIRI E. M. S. ANAMVersus

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed

COURT NO. : 7NEELI ANTHARJANAM (DEAD) THR.LRS. . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV

199 C.A. No. 4443/2010XI-A

M/S.TRAVANCORE TITANIUMPRODUCTS LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R. SATHISH, C. K. SASI

200 C.A. No.9212-9213/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDANR.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[P-2]

VersusTHE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBTRECOVERY TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.8980-8981/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. PROMILA[P-1]

VersusM/S A. J. INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.AND ANR.

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1], SANJAYKAPUR[R-2]

201 C.A. No. 5982/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S JAGATPAL PREM CHAND LTD. REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-1]

202 C.A. No.3132-3137/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE,ALLAHABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S VARANASI BOTTLING CO. PVT.LTD.AND ORS. M. P. DEVANATH

203 C.A. No. 2944/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE.DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S VISHAL BEVERAGES(P) LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

204 C.A. No.6387-6391/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND. LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

205 C.A. No. 8620/2011XIV-A

M/S ANKIT EXIM PVT.LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

206 C.A. No. 4432/2009III

MANISHA PHARMO PLAST PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:57:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR