supplemental soil investigation

29, 39, & 43 Hospital Drive

Moose Factory, ON

Supplemental Soil

Investigation

PREPARED FOR:

Barry Bryan Associates

250 Water Street, Unit 201

Whitby, ON L1N 0G5

PREPARED BY:

PGL Environmental Consultants

250 Water Street, Unit 102

Whitby, ON L1N 0G5

PGL File: 3889-02.01

February 2018

Executive Summary

PGL Environmental Consultants (PGL) completed a Supplemental Soil Investigation at 29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive in Moose Factory, Ontario (the Site). The Site is on federally owned lands near the Moose Factory water treatment plant. The investigation was completed for Barry Bryan Associates, to further delineate identified soil impacts for disposal purposes prior to demolishing existing buildings at Site.

The three properties are each developed with a single-storey, slab-on-grade structures. There are also separate outbuildings (garage/shop) on each property. There were five aboveground tanks (ASTs) for heating oil on the three properties: one at 29 Hospital Drive (tank system 1, TS1), two at 39 Hospital Drive (TS2), and two at 43 Hospital Drive (TS3). The ASTs were removed in October 2012.

PGL reviewed an AST removal and soil assessment report by KGS Group (January 2013). KGS conducted soil sampling on October 24, 2012, in the three TS areas near surficial staining. Twelve shallow soil samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and petroleum hydrocarbons fractions 1 to 4 (PHCs F1 to F4). Results were evaluated against the Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the protection of human health and environmental health and Canada Wide Standards (CWS) for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil, Tier 1, for residential/parkland land use (RL). There were shallow soil exceedances of benzene, toluene and PHC F1, F3, and F4. KGS recommended that an additional investigation be conducted to delineate soil and evaluate groundwater conditions for BTEX and PHC in the three TS areas.

PGL supervised the advancement of four test pits in each of the three TS areas in early November 2017. Soil samples were submitted for BTEX, PHC F1 to F4, and select samples for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Results were evaluated against CSQGs, CWS Tier 1, for RL. One soil sample was submitted for waste classification.

One soil sample (TP02) in TS1 exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2 from a depth of 2.5m below ground surface. The remaining soil samples met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. Soil samples were wet at 2.0m below ground surface within the test pits. Water seepage or sloughing-in of test pit sidewalls was not observed. Based on waste classification testing, the soil can be classified as non-hazardous and non-ignitable for the purpose of offsite disposal. Laboratory results should be provided to the receiving facility in advance for review and acknowledgment of acceptance of the soil.

Soil contamination in TS1 was delineated, excluding to the south due to the existing road. Soil contamination in TS2 was delineated excluding to the west side of the building, where the partially collapsed building, debris, vegetation, and snow cover prevented sampling. Soil contamination in TS3 was delineated.

There may be impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the identified soil impacts. Groundwater was not investigated in this program, it was not part of the scope, as directed by client request due to time constraints. If groundwater is being managed during the demolition, it should be assumed to be contaminated for handling purposes or it could be tested through installing monitoring wells.

During demolition, building slabs, footings, and soil should be monitored for PHC impacts and segregated for disposal, as needed. Additional soil investigations under the buildings maybe required based on these observations. It may be advisable to have an environmental consultant onsite to assist with these tasks.

This Executive Summary is subject to the same standard limitations as contained in the report and must be read in conjunction with the entire report.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Health and Safety Plan ........................................................................................... 2

3.2 Site Clearances ...................................................................................................... 3

3.3 Test Pitting and Sampling ....................................................................................... 3

3.4 Site Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................... 3

4.0 Investigation Results ........................................................................................................ 4

4.1 Field Observations .................................................................................................. 4

4.2 Soil Results and Evaluation .................................................................................... 5

4.2.1 Tank System 1 – 29 Hospital Drive ........................................................... 5



4.2.4 Waste Characterization ............................................................................. 5

4.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Summary ......................................................... 6

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................. 6

6.0 Standard Limitations ......................................................................................................... 7

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Investigation Locations Figure 3a Soil Results – Former Tank System 1 Figure 3b Soil Results – Former Tank System 2 & 3

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Soil Results – Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 2 Soil Results – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Table 3 Soil Results – Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Borehole Logs Appendix 2 Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

List of Acronyms

AST - aboveground storage tanks

bgs - below ground surface

BTEX - benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes

CSQG - Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines

CWS - Canada Wide Standards

OVM - organic vapour meter

PAHs - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

PGL - PGL Environmental Consultants

PHCs - petroleum hydrocarbons

PHCs - petroleum hydrocarbons

ppm - parts per million

QA/QC - quality assurance/quality control

RL - residential land use

RPD - relative percent difference

TP - Test Pit

TS - Tank System

Supplemental Soil Investigation February 2018 Barry Bryan Associates Page 1 PGL File: 3889-02.01

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Barry Bryan Associates (BBA) retained PGL Environmental Consultants (PGL) to conduct a Supplemental Soil Investigation at 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive in Moose Factory, Ontario (the Site).

The objective of the investigation was to delineate the extent of previously identified shallow soil impacts to assess soil quality for disposal as a part of the building demolition work.

1.1 Background

Moose Factory, Ontario is located on Moose Factory Island, approximately 16km south of James Bay, on the waters of the Moose River. The community of Moosonee is located on the mainland approximately 2km to the northwest of Moose Factory. Transportation and access to the island is limited to boats (barge and water taxi), helicopters, and winter ice roads.

The Site is comprised of three addresses: 29, 39 and 43 Hospital Drive. Each property is developed with a single-storey, slab-on0grade structure. There are also separate outbuildings (garage/shop) on each property. There were five aboveground tanks (ASTs) that supplied #2 heating oil to oil-fired furnaces at the Site: one at 29 Hospital Drive (tank system 1, TS1), two at 39 Hospital Drive (TS2), and two at 43 Hospital Drive (TS3). The ASTs were removed in October 2012.

We understand the buildings are to be demolished, and that excavation of soil around the buildings is expected to be roughly: 0.3m below ground surface (bgs) at TS1, 0.45m bgs at TS2, and 0.15m bgs at TS3.

PGL reviewed an AST removal report by KGS Group (KGS), January 2013. KGS decommissioned and removed the below listed ASTs as a part of their work program.

Tank System (TS) Description

TS1 - 29 Hospital Drive (Garage)

• 1 exterior AST, 910L single-walled steel

• 1.5m from southeast corner of building

TS2 - 39 Hospital Drive (Former Carpentry Shop)

• 2 exterior ASTs, 1,135L single-walled steel

• 1.5m from south of exterior wall

TS3 - 43 Hospital Drive (Former Carpentry Shop)

• 2 exterior ASTs, 1,135L single-walled steel

• 10m east of carpentry shop

Surficial soil samples from 0.1m to 0.3m below ground surface (bgs) were collected in areas of staining. Results for the following parameters exceeded the applicable standards as follows:

• TS1: three soils were analyzed (MF-S1 to -S3). Benzene (S3) and toluene (S2) exceeded;

• TS2: five soils were analyzed (MF-S4 to -S8). Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) F1 (S8), PHC F3 (S4), and PHC F4 (S5) exceeded; and


• TS3: four soils were analyzed (MF-S9 to -S12). PHC F1(S8), PCH F3 (S11) and PHC F4 (S13 duplicate of S9) exceeded.

KGS concluded impacts at all three-former tank exceeded both Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and Tier 1 generic and site-specific criteria, and therefore, pose a risk to be human and/or ecological health. KGS recommended that an additional investigation be conducted to delineate soil and groundwater conditions for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylene (BTEX) and PHC fractions F1 to F4 in the three tank system areas.

Based on e-mail communication (November 3, 2017) with BBA and Public Service and Procurement Canada, the Site is owned by the Crown and future residential use was to be assumed. Additionally, PGL was instructed to only conduct soil testing and not groundwater as part of this scope, to meet the compressed project schedule.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

To meet the objective noted above, PGL:

1. Advanced four test pits at each of the three TS areas to a depth of 3m bgs (for a total of 12 test pits);

2. Sampled and logged soil during test pitting, and screened soils with an organic vapour meter (OVM);

3. Selected two soil samples per test pit for vertical delineation, for analysis based on field indicators of contamination (e.g., staining, odour, and field screening concentrations) and location relative to potential contaminant sources;

4. Submitted all soil samples for analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4;

5. One Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure composite sample was collected and analyzed for waste characterization of the Site. The sample was analyzed for leachable metals and inorganics, volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and ignitability; and

6. Submitted select samples for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) due to historical use of #2 heating (fuel) oil at Site.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

PGL completed a soil investigation at the Site from November 7 to 9, 2017. The work was conducted consistent with PGL’s standard operating field procedures and applicable guidelines, standards, and regulations.

The investigation locations are presented on Figure 2.

3.1 Health and Safety Plan

PGL prepared a health and safety plan that included:

• A description of work;

• Job safety analysis procedures;


• Emergency contact details and muster locations;

• Hospital contact information and a map to the hospital;

• Identification of first-aid representatives; and

• Daily tailgate meeting sheets.

Daily tailgate meetings were conducted each morning to discuss, as a minimum, safety topics, changes in Site conditions, and emergency procedures.

3.2 Site Clearances

BBA retained multiVIEW Locates to complete public and private utility locating prior to starting the intrusive investigations. To reduce the chance of striking underground utilities, investigation locations were electromagnetically swept for conductive utilities from November 7 to 9, 2017.

Some investigation locations were near aboveground utilities and conduits. PGL worked with the excavation operator to ensure appropriate distances were maintained from the utilities. No excavation work was completed within 3m of a utility pole or overhead wire.

3.3 Test Pitting and Sampling

BBA retained Brian Innes Construction to advance test pits using a rubber-tire backhoe. Test pit excavation was conducted on November 8 and 9, 2017. Twelve test pits (TP01 to TP12) were advanced to a maximum depth of 3.0m bgs; four in each of the three TS areas.

PGL logged soil stratigraphy and collected soil samples during excavation. Samples were collected from the backhoe bucket. Soil stratigraphy is presented on test pit logs provided in Appendix 1.

To field-screen soil samples for the presence of volatile organic vapours, portions of soil samples were collected and placed in polyethylene bags. Time was allowed for vapours to off-gas from the soil before an RKI Eagle, an OVM capable of measuring combustible organic vapour concentrations, was used to test headspace vapours in the sample bags. Headspace vapour concentrations are presented in the test pit logs (Appendix 1).

Soil samples were placed directly into laboratory-supplied glass jars and glass vials, and were kept cool prior to delivery to the laboratory. Samples for BTEX, and PHC F1 were collected in sample containers pre-charged with methanol preservative. Samples were selected for analysis based on the vapour readings, field observations (staining, odour etc.), location with respect to the risks identified in the 2013 KGS report, and planned scope of work. Samples were couriered to ALS Environmental (ALS) in Thunder Bay, Ontario.

3.4 Site Evaluation Criteria

The Site is under federal jurisdiction, therefore PGL assessed laboratory results using the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Canadian Environmental Guidelines dated 1999, update 7.0 and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Canada Wide Standards for PHC dated May 2001, revised January 2008. Data from the previous investigations have been compared to these standards.


Soil standards under the federal regime are based on site use and site location with respect to environmental and human receptors. The Site’s various addresses have different uses, including industrial, commercial, community, and residential. Previous investigations have assessed the Site as residential/parkland land use; this allows potential residential activities on the Site in the future. Based on e-mail communication with BBA and Public Service and Procurement Canada, future residential use was to be assumed for the Site. The applicable standards for this Site are therefore:

• Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the protection of human health and environmental health for residential/parkland use; and

• Canada Wide Standards (CWS) for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil, Tier 1, for residential/parkland land use (RL), where the standards are based on whether the soil is fine- or coarse-grained.

Grain-size analysis was not completed as part of the investigation. Field observations indicated a silty sand stratigraphy (i.e., coarse-textured soils).

Soil results are compared to the most stringent standards for both soil textures (coarse and fine).

4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

The investigation findings are presented in the following sections. PHC F2 exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards at one location (TP02). All other soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. Soil results are presented in Table 1 (Petroleum Hydrocarbons), and Table 2 (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons). Test pit locations are shown on Figures 3a and 3b. Laboratory certificates of analysis are presented in Appendix 2.

4.1 Field Observations

The buildings in each of the three TS areas were dilapidated and the ground was snow covered.

Field observations during test pit excavation identified topsoil at ground surface at all twelve locations. Underlying the topsoil is the native silty sand to the maximum depth of investigation. Soil samples were wet in appearance at 2.0m bgs; indicative of the water table. Some odours were observed below 2.0m at TP02. Organic staining was observed in TP05, TP06, and TP07 below the water table.

No extraneous materials (e.g., bricks, glass, building debris) were noted during test pit excavation works. Test pit walls did not cave in during excavation and no groundwater seepage or sheen was observed within the test pits or on soil samples collected for screening. OVM readings were all observed to be less than 25 parts per million (ppm) hexane, and ranging between 0ppm and 23ppm isobutylene. Stratigraphy and field-screening measurements are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix 1.


4.2 Soil Results and Evaluation

4.2.1 Tank System 1 – 29 Hospital Drive

One sample (TP02-05) marginally exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2. All other soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.

The PHC F2 exceedance (TP02-05) was collected at 2.5m bgs from south of the former garage at 29 Hospital Drive. The exceedance is delineated at depth; TP02-06 at 3m bgs met the applicable standards. Lateral delineation further south and west was not possible due to the proximity of the roadway about 1.5m away. Lateral delineation to the east was achieved by TP03, roughly 12m away from TP02. A test pit could not be completed closer due to existing overhead lines and a utility pole. The PHC F2 result (168μg/g) marginally exceeds CWS Tier 1 RL coarse-grained standard of 150μg/g. Based on Site conditions, high water table and coarse-textured soils and distance of this sample from the former AST, groundwater contamination is suspected in this area.

This area is expected to be excavated to a depth of 0.3m bgs, which is much shallower than the depth of impacts (2.5m bgs).


All soil samples submitted for analysis from this area met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.

PGL was unable to fully delineate shallow impacts identified by KGS in their investigation due to debris within the building footprint, snow cover, and a high density of vegetation along the west side of the former building. The backhoe was unable to access the west side of the building to delineate the exceedance at MF-S6. The remaining exceedances have been delineated south and east.

This area is expected to be excavated to a depth of 0.45m bgs, which is slightly deeper than the depth of impacts identified by KGS.


All soil samples submitted for analysis met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards. TS3 has been fully delineated laterally and at depth as shown on Figure 3b.

4.2.4 Waste Characterization

All results met Schedule 4 (Leachate Quality Criteria) of Ontario Regulation 558, and the soil is non-hazardous and non-ignitable. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure sample results are presented in Table 3.


4.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Summary

A quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program was implemented as part of our work to:

• Confirm that field sampling methods and laboratory analyses were reliable;

• Ensure that the sampling methods produced representative samples of environmental media through the use of standard operating procedures; and

• Verify that the quality of reported results were suitable to support decisions and interpretation based on the data.

Quality assurance measures applicable to this report included:

• Data QA/QC reviews by designated personnel;

• Preferred use of electronically transferred data in all tables;

• Analysis of duplicate sample results and internal laboratory QA/QC; and

• Review of methodologies and procedures.

Precision, accuracy, representativeness, and completeness are addressed in the QA/QC program. There were no issues identified with our data or methodologies that affect the conclusions of this report.

Twenty-six soil samples, including two duplicate pairs, were collected and analyzed for BTEX and PHC F1-F4 fractions. Seven samples, including one duplicate pair, were collected and analyzed for PAHs. PGL calculated relative percent difference (RPD) values for all sample/duplicate pairs meet the screening criteria for all parameters tested, except for one sample-replicate pair (TP02-05/Z002). RPD values for this sample-replicate pair met the target for all parameters except for PHC F2. The PHC F2 RPD for TP02/Z001 is 74%, above the target RPD of 60%.

The sample-replicate pair was collected from silty sand with a slight hydrocarbon-like odour. Adequate sample splitting can be difficult with coarse soils (such as sands). An uneven distribution of fine material into the sample and replicate jars may have contributed to the high RPD value as PHCs tend to attach more easily to finer particles. Based on field observations of hydrocarbon odours, and the value for PHC F2 in the parent sample only just exceeding the standards, we do consider the higher value of the sample-replicate pair to still represent the soil quality. This does not significantly affect our conclusions about the extent of impacts observed at the Site.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PGL conducted a Supplemental Soil Investigation for BBA, to delineate shallow hydrocarbon soil impacts in three areas at Site. The objective was to identify soil quality and the extent of impacts for the eventual disposal of soil as a part of building demolition work.

PGL supervised the advancement of 12 test pits at Site. Four test pits were completed in each of the three TS areas. Soil samples were analyzed for one or more of BTEX, PHCs, and PAHs. One soil sample (TP02), in TS1, exceeded the CWS Tier 1 RL standards for PHC F2. The remaining soil samples met the CWS Tier 1 RL and CSQG standards.


The following is a summary of the impacted areas:

Location Vertically Delineated Laterally Delineated

TS1

Yes. Maximum depth of impact at 2.5m bgs.

Clean samples at 3m bgs

Yes - North, east, and west.

Delineation not achieved to the south of TP02 due to existing roadway

TS2


Clean samples at 0.5m bgs

Yes – North, south, and east.

Delineation not achieved to the west where partially collapsed building, debris, vegetation and snow cover prevented sampling

TS3


Clean samples at 0.5m bgs

Yes - North, south, east, and west.

Excavated soil the soil is non-hazardous and non-ignitable and may be disposed of at an approved landfill. The laboratory results in Appendix 2 should be provided to the receiving facility in advance for review and acknowledgment of acceptance of the soil.

There may be impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the identified soil impacts. Groundwater was not investigated in this program, it was not part of the scope, as directed by the client. If groundwater is being managed during the demolition, it should be assumed to be contaminated for handling purposes or it could be tested through installing monitoring wells.

During demolition, building slabs, footings and soil should be monitored for PHC impacts and segregated for disposal, as needed. Additional soil investigations under the buildings maybe required based on these observations. It may be advisable to have an environmental consultant onsite to assist with these tasks.

6.0 STANDARD LIMITATIONS

PGL prepared this report for our client and its agents exclusively. PGL accepts no responsibility for any damages that may be suffered by third parties as a result of decisions or actions based on this report.

The report’s purpose is to provide the client with an assessment of contamination on the site. The investigation consisted of a screening for potential contamination and, as is true for all environmental investigations, potential remains for the presence of unknown, unidentified, or unforeseen surface or subsurface contamination. More or different investigation may be required if other risks are identified. The data presented in this report is valid for the date of sampling, but site conditions may change with time.

The findings and conclusions are site-specific and were developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by environmental professionals currently practising under similar conditions in the area. Changing assessment techniques, regulations, and site conditions means that environmental investigations and their conclusions can quickly become dated, so this report is for use now. The report should not be used after that without PGL review/approval.


The project has been conducted according to our instructions and work program. Additional conditions, and limitations on our liability are set forth in our work program/contract. This report is neither an endorsement nor a condemnation of the subject property. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Respectfully submitted,

PGL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Per:

Salima Jaffer, B.Sc. Environmental Consultant

Kim Worboy, P.Eng., QPRA

Senior Environmental Consultant EAF/SAJ/KJW/slr M:\3800-3899\3889\02-01\r-3889-02-01-Phase 2-Feb18-Rev1.doc

srogers

k stamp

Figures

Original in colour

±

0 0.5 10.25 km1:25,000±

0 40 8020 m1:2,000

Image: ESRI Base Imagery

NOV 2017

Date:

3889-02.01

File No.: Dwg No.:

38890201-11 DPL

Drawn by: FIGURE

1

SITE LOCATION29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON

SITE

BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES

Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-11.mxd

Approximate Scale

Approximate Scale

C E N T E R R O A DSITE

HO

SP

I TA

L DR

I VE

TH

UR

ST

ON

ST

RE

ET

"

5

"

5"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5"

5

"

5

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*

##*

##*

TP04

MF-S6MF-S8

MF-S7

MF-S4MF-S5

MF-S12

MF-S11MF-S9

MF-S10

MF-S3 MF-S2MF-S1

GARAGE

SHED

OFFICEBUILDING

FIRE HALL

FORMER COMMUNITY HALL

FORMER WAREHOUSE/CARPENTRY SHOP

TP10TP09

TP11TP12

TP01

TP02 TP03

TP08

TP07TP06

TP05

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, andthe GIS User Community

"

5

Test Pit (PGL, 2017)

##* Historical Soil Sample (KGS, 2012)

Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-21.mxd

± 0 10 205 m1:600Approximate Scale

Original in colour

C E N T E R R O A DH

OS

PI T

AL D

RI V

E

Original in colour


DEC 2017

Date:

3889-02.01

File No.: Dwg No.:

38890201-21 DPL

Drawn by: FIGURE

2

INVESTIGATION LOCATIONS29, 39, and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON


"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*

##*

##*

TP04

MF-S3MF-S2

MF-S1

GARAGE

SHED

OFFICEBUILDING

FIRE HALL

29 HOSPITAL DRIVE(TS 1)

TP01

TP02 TP03


"

5



Sample meets applicable Standards

Sample exceeds applicable Standards

Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-31A.mxd

± 0 5 102.5 m1:400Approximate Scale

Original in colour

C E N T E R R O A D

Original in colour


DEC 2017

Date:

3889-02.01

File No.: Dwg No.:

38890201-31A DPL

Drawn by: FIGURE

3a

SOIL RESULTS - FORMER TANK SYSTEM 129 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON


"5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

"

5

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*##*

##*

##*

##*

##*

MF-S6

MF-S8MF-S7

MF-S4MF-S5

MF-S12

MF-S11 MF-S9

MF-S10FORMER WAREHOUSE/CARPENTRY SHOP

FORMER COMMUNITY HALL

FIRE HALL



TP10

TP09

TP11

TP12

TP08

TP07TP06

TP05


"

5



Sample meets applicable Standards

Sample exceeds applicable Standards

Q:\3800-3899\3889 - BBA\02.01 - Moose Factory\Graphics\38890201-31B.mxd

± 0 5 102.5 m1:400Approximate Scale

Original in colour

HO

SP

I TA

L DR

I VE

Original in colour


DEC 2017

Date:

3889-02.01

File No.: Dwg No.:

38890201-31B DPL

Drawn by: FIGURE

3b

SOIL RESULTS - FORMER TANK SYSTEM 2 & 339 and 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON


Tables

Soil sample results are presented as ug/g (ppm) on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted

Z### Field duplicate sample

TP Test Pit

- Not analyzed

~ No Standard

m bgs Metres below ground surface

< Less than stated detection limit

CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment

CWS Tier 1 Canada-wide standard for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil

CSQGCanadian Soil (or Sediment) Quality Guidelines for the protection of the environment and

human health

RL Residential Land Use

# Greater than applicable Standard

RDL Reportable Detection Limit

F1 (C6-C10) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 1




F1-BTEX Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 1 excluding benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes

F2-Naphth Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 2 excluding naphthalene

F3-PAH Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction 3 excluding Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

B(a)P Total Potency

EquivalentBenzo(a)pyrene Total Potency Equivalent

Analytical Table Notes

Table 1

Soil Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons

29, 39, 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON

Barry Bryan Associates, PGL File: 3889-02.01

Be

nze

ne

To

luen

e

Eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

Xy

len

e T

ota

l

F1

(C

6-C

10

)

F1

-BT

EX

F2

(C

10

-C1

6)

F3

(C

16

-C3

4)

F4

(C

34

-C5

0)

µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g

RDL 0.0068 0.08 0.01 0.05 5 5 10 50 50

CSQG RL Coarse Grained Surface Soil 0.03 0.37 0.082 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CSQG RL Fine Grained Surface Soil 0.0068 0.08 0.018 2.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Surface Soils ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 30 150 300 2800

CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Subsoils ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 30 150 2500 10000

CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Subsoils ~ ~ ~ ~ 170 170 230 3500 10000

CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Surface Soils ~ ~ ~ ~ 170 170 150 1300 5600

Sample Location Sample IDSample Depth

(m bgs)Sample Date

Analytical Report

Reference Number

TP01-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP01-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP02-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 168 <50 <50

Z001 (TP02-05) 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 77 <50 <50

TP02-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP03-03 1.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP03-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP04-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP04-04 2 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP05-04 2 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP05-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP06-03 1.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP06-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP07-01 0.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP07-05 2.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP08-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP08-06 3 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP09-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

Z002 (TP09-01) 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP09-04 2 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP10-02 1 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP10-05 2.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP11-03 1.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP11-06 3 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP12-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

TP12-05 2.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <0.0068 <0.08 <0.018 <0.05 <5 <5 <10 <50 <50

PHCs

TP01

TP02

TP03

TP04

TP11

TP12

TP05

TP06

TP07

TP08

TP09

TP10

PGL Environmental

December 2017

EAF/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 1

Page 1 of 1

Table 2

Soil Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons



F2

-Na

ph

th

F3

-PA

H

Ac

en

ap

hth

en

e

Ac

en

ap

hth

yle

ne

Ac

rid

ine

An

thra

ce

ne

Be

nzo

(a)a

nth

rac

en

e

Be

nzo

(a)p

yre

ne

Be

nzo

(g,h

,i)p

ery

len

e

Be

nzo

(b)f

luo

ran

the

ne

Be

nzo

(k)f

luo

ran

the

ne

Ch

rys

en

e

Dib

en

zo

(a,h

)an

thra

ce

ne

Flu

ora

nth

en

e

Flu

ore

ne

Ind

en

o(1

,2,3

-cd

)py

ren

e

1-M

eth

yln

ap

hth

ale

ne

2-M

eth

yln

ap

hth

ale

ne

Na

ph

tha

len

e

Ph

en

an

thre

ne

Py

ren

e

Qu

ino

lin

e

IAC

R (

CC

ME

)

B(a

)P T

ota

l P

ote

nc

y E

qu

iva

len

t

µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g mg/kg mg/kg

RDL 10 50 0.05 0.05 0.8 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.46 0.15

CSQG RL Coarse Grained Surface Soil ~ ~ 0.28 320 ~ 2.5 1 0.6 ~ 1 1 6.2 1 15.4 0.25 1 ~ ~ 0.013 0.046 7.7 ~ 1 1

CSQG RL Fine Grained Surface Soil ~ ~ 0.28 320 ~ 2.5 1 0.6 ~ 1 1 6.2 1 15.4 0.25 1 ~ ~ 0.013 0.046 7.7 ~ 1 1

CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Surface Soils 150 300 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CWS Tier 1 RL Coarse Grained Subsoils 150 2500 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Subsoils 230 3500 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CWS Tier 1 RL Fine Grained Surface Soils 150 1300 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Sample Location Sample IDSample Depth

(m bgs)Sample Date

Analytical Report

Reference Number

TP01 TP01-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

TP04 TP04-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

TP05 TP05-02 1 8-Nov-17 L2021558 - - <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

TP07 TP07-01 0.5 8-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

TP09-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

Z002 (TP09-01) 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

TP12 TP12-01 0.5 9-Nov-17 L2021558 <10 <50 <0.05 <0.05 <0.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.46 <0.15

Other PAH PAH

TP09

PGL Environmental

December 2017

EAF/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 2

Page 1 of 1

Table 3

Soil Results - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure



ABNs Other PAH PCB PHCs

Nit

rite

/nit

rate

as

N f

or

R5

58

2,4

-Din

itro

tolu

en

e

Pen

tach

loro

ph

en

ol

2,4

-dic

hlo

rop

hen

ol

2,4

,5-t

rich

loro

ph

en

ol

2,4

,6-t

rich

loro

ph

en

ol

2,3

,4,6

-tetr

ach

loro

ph

en

ol

Hexach

loro

ben

zen

e

Hexach

loro

bu

tad

ien

e

Hexach

loro

eth

an

e

3-&

4-m

eth

ylp

hen

ol

Aro

ch

lor

1242

Aro

ch

lor

1248

Aro

ch

lor

1254

Aro

ch

lor

1260

PC

Bs

(S

um

of

tota

l)

Ben

zen

e

pH

(F

inal)

pH

(In

itia

l)

Flu

ori

de

Cyan

ide (

WA

D)

Ars

en

ic

Bari

um

Bo

ron

(B

), A

vailab

le

Cad

miu

m

Ch

rom

ium

Lead

Me

rcu

ry

Sele

niu

m

Sil

ve

r

Ura

niu

m

mg/l µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L pH_Units pH_Units µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

RDL 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 10 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 20 0.1 0.1 10000 100 50 500 2500 5 50 50 0.1 20 5 250

O. Reg. 347 Amendment 558 - Schd 4 1000 130 6000 90000 400000 500 10000 130 500 3000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 300 500 ~ ~ 150000 ~ 2500 100000 500000 500 5000 5000 100 1000 5000 10000

Sample Location Sample Date

TCLP 8-Nov-17 <4 <4 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <4 <4 <4 <10 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.4 <25 5.54 9.23 <10,000 <100 <50 <500 <2500 <5 <50 <50 <0.1 <25 <5 <250

Chlorophenols OC Pesticides Other PCB Physical Inorganics Metals

PGL Environmental

December 2017

jdb/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 3

Page 1 of 2

Table 3

Soil Results - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure



RDL

O. Reg. 347 Amendment 558 - Schd 4

Sample Location Sample Date

TCLP 8-Nov-17

2-m

eth

ylp

hen

ol

Ben

zo

(a)p

yre

ne

Cre

so

l T

ota

l

Carb

on

tetr

ach

lori

de

Ch

loro

ben

zen

e

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

yle

ne

Ch

loro

form

1,2

-Dic

hlo

rob

en

zen

e

1,4

-Dic

hlo

rob

en

zen

e

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e

Me

thy

l E

thy

l K

eto

ne

Meth

yle

ne C

hlo

rid

e

Tetr

ach

loro

eth

yle

ne

Tri

ch

loro

eth

yle

ne

Vin

yl

Ch

lori

de

Nit

rob

en

zen

e

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

5 0.2 10 20 20 20 100 20 20 20 1000 500 20 20 50 4

200000 1 200000 500 8000 1400 10000 20000 500 500 200000 5000 3000 5000 200 2000

<5 <0.2 <15 <25 <25 <25 <100 <25 <25 <25 <1000 <500 <25 <25 <50 <4

PAH VOC

PGL Environmental

December 2017

jdb/OGM t-3889-02-01-Dec17.xlsmTable 3

Page 2 of 2

Appendix 1

Borehole Logs

TOPSOIL

Silty SANDfine grained, brown, moist

fine to medium grained, trace oxidation below 1.0 m

wet below 2.0 m

grey below 2.5 m

increased silt content below 3.0 m

End of test pit at 3.00 mTS1 - 29 Hospital Drive

TP01-01

TP01-02:PAHPHC/BTEX

TP01-03

TP01-04

TP01-05:PHC/BTEX

TP01-06

Sample Notes Grab Sample

Page 1 of 1

INVESTIG. METHOD: Excavator

INVESTIG. DATE: November 8, 2017

LOGGED BY: EAF HOLE DIAM (mm):

SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)

PGL PROJECT NO: 3889-02.01

THIS LOG IS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES ONLY.

TP01

TEST PIT NO:

SURFACE ELEVATION: n/a

TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

CLIENT: Barry Bryan Associates

PROJECT: 29, 39 & 43 Hospital Drive, Moose Factory, ON

PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES

VAPOUR READING (ppmv)

PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

diesel odour below 2.5 m

coarse grained below 3.0 m


TP02-01

TP02-02

TP02-03

TP02-04(Z001):PHC/BTEX

TP02-05:PHC/BTEX

TP02-06:PHC/BTEX


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP02

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

1

23

1

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.5 m

coarse grained, some oxidation below 3.0 m


TP03-01

TP03-02

TP03-03:PHC/BTEX

TP03-04

TP03-05

TP03-06:PHC/BTEX


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP03

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m



TP04-01:PAHPHC/BTEX

TP04-02

TP04-03

TP04-04:PHC/BTEX

TP04-05

TP04-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP04

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

trace grey with dark staining below 2.5 m

some oxidation, trace coarse grained sand below 3.0 m


TP05-01

TP05-02:PAH

TP05-03

TP05-04:PHC/BTEX

TP05-05

TP05-06:PHC/BTEX


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP05

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet, grey with black organic staining below 2.0 m


TP06-01

TP06-02

TP06-03:PHC/BTEX

TP06-04

TP06-05:PHC/BTEX

TP06-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP06

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

grey, trace black organic staining below 2.5 m


TP07-01:PAHPHC/BTEX

TP07-02

TP07-03

TP07-04

TP07-05:PHC/BTEX

TP07-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP07

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL

Silty SANDfine grained, trace roots, brown, moist

no rootlets below 1.0 m

wet below 2.0 m

trace coarse grained sand, trace oxidation below 2.5 m

grey below 3.0 m


TP08-01

TP08-02:PHC/BTEX

TP08-03

TP08-04

TP08-05

TP08-06:PHC/BTEX


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP08

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

grey below 2.5 m

coarse grained, brown below 3.0 m


TP09-01(Z002):PAHPHC/BTEX

TP09-02

TP09-03

TP09-04:PHC/BTEX

TP09-05

TP09-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP09

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

grey, coarse grained, some oxidation below 2.5 m


TP10-01

TP10-02:PHC/BTEX

TP10-03

TP10-04

TP10-05:PHC/BTEX

TP10-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP10

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m

coarse grained, grey below 2.5 m


TP11-01

TP11-02

TP11-03:PHC/BTEX

TP11-04

TP11-05

TP11-06:PHC/BTEX


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP11

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

TOPSOIL


wet below 2.0 m



TP12-01:PAHPHC/BTEX

TP12-02

TP12-03

TP12-04

TP12-05:PHC/BTEX

TP12-06


Page 1 of 1




SO

IL T

YP

E

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)



TP12

TEST PIT NO:


TEST PIT RECORDD

EP

TH

(m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION



PG

L M

ULT

I-T

ES

T V

AP

OR

LO

G 2

015

388

9-02

.01.

GP

J P

GL_

DF

_ST

D_2

0160

225.

GD

T

12/1

1/17

LAB

OR

AT

OR

YA

NA

LYS

ES


PID READING (ppmv)

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

<25

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

Appendix 2

Laboratory Certificates of Analysis

[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]

13-NOV-17

Lab Work Order #: L2021558

Date Received:Pottinger Gaherty Environmental

102 - 250 Water StreetWhitby ON L1N 0G5

ATTN: Salima JafferFINAL REV. 224-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)Report Date:

Version:

Certificate of Analysis

ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

____________________________________________

Mathy MahadevaAccount Manager

ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062

Client Phone: 905-668-4908

ADDITIONAL 13-NOV-17 11:55Comments:

MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:

C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:

24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)

Sample ID Description

Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time

ALS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2021558 CONTD....

2PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers detected.

Version: FINAL REV. 2

15

SOIL

SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17 08-NOV-17

TP01-02 TP01-05 TP02-05 TP02-06 TP03-03

L2021558-1 L2021558-2 L2021558-3 L2021558-4 L2021558-5

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)

Xylenes (Total) (ug/g)

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%)

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene (%)

F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)

Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50) (ug/g)

Chrom. to baseline at nC50

Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride (%)

Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene (%)

Acenaphthene (ug/g)

Acenaphthylene (ug/g)

Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)

Benzo(a)anthracene (ug/g)

Benzo(a)pyrene (ug/g)

Benzo(b)fluoranthene (ug/g)

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene (ug/g)

Benzo(k)fluoranthene (ug/g)

Chrysene (ug/g)

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene (ug/g)

Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ug/g)

1-Methylnaphthalene (ug/g)


17.6 23.5 11.5 10.2 18.4

<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

100.7 95.5 107.8 101.7 102.1

102.5 98.2 104.0 100.9 104.4

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<10 <10 168 <10 <10

<10

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<50

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<72 <72 168 <72 <72

YES YES YES YES YES

80.8 81.6 84.0 81.2 79.5

91.9 87.3 98.4 86.9 87.7

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

Physical Tests

Volatile Organic Compounds

Hydrocarbons

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

3PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP03-06 TP04-01 TP04-04 TP05-02 TP05-04

L2021558-6 L2021558-7 L2021558-8 L2021558-9 L2021558-10

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)




F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)





Acenaphthene (ug/g)


Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)






Chrysene (ug/g)


Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)




19.6 15.4 8.86 20.1 19.9

<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

95.0 126.6 102.3 97.0

98.2 126.6 105.9 100.9

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<10 <10 <10 <10

<10

<50 <50 <50 <50

<50

<50 <50 <50 <50

<72 <72 <72 <72

YES YES YES YES

82.2 87.4 84.7 84.5

85.4 117.2 82.5 92.8

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.80 <0.80

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.020 <0.020

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.020 <0.020

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

Physical Tests


Hydrocarbons


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

4PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP05-06 Z001 TP06-03 TP06-05 TP07-01

L2021558-11 L2021558-12 L2021558-13 L2021558-14 L2021558-15

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)




F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)





Acenaphthene (ug/g)


Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)






Chrysene (ug/g)


Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)




17.8 11.4 17.9 23.1 16.8

<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

91.5 100.8 95.5 86.8 93.3

94.1 104.7 98.5 90.3 96.5

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<10 77 <10 <10 <10

<10

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<50

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<72 77 <72 <72 <72

YES YES YES YES YES

84.4 97.2 82.4 82.3 85.2

83.3 86.7 84.2 73.5 84.4

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

Physical Tests


Hydrocarbons


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

5PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP07-05 TP08-02 TP08-06 TP09-01 TP09-04

L2021558-16 L2021558-17 L2021558-18 L2021558-19 L2021558-20

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)




F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)





Acenaphthene (ug/g)


Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)






Chrysene (ug/g)


Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)




20.3 7.53 18.6 17.5 15.2

<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

92.3 100.4 101.0 99.8 103.4

95.5 104.8 104.1 102.0 109.2

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<10 <10 <10 <10 <10

<10

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<50

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<72 <72 <72 <72 <72

YES YES YES YES YES

87.2 82.9 84.9 81.6 85.0

84.0 85.1 89.2 91.8 86.1

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

Physical Tests


Hydrocarbons


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

6PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP10-02 TP10-05 TP11-03 Z002 TP11-06

L2021558-21 L2021558-22 L2021558-23 L2021558-24 L2021558-25

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)




F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)





Acenaphthene (ug/g)


Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)






Chrysene (ug/g)


Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)




18.1 14.6 17.6 16.9 21.5

<0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050

88.2 107.9 103.1 106.1 89.3

92.1 105.6 101.6 104.1 93.7

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0

<10 <10 <10 <10 <10

<10

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<50

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50

<72 <72 <72 <72 <72

YES YES YES YES YES

81.0 78.0 76.1 73.9 81.9

75.3 103.0 98.6 98.7 87.3

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

Physical Tests


Hydrocarbons


VOCJ

VOCJ

VOCJ

VOCJ

VOCJ

VOCJ

24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

7PAGE of



15

SOIL

SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17

TP12-01 TP12-05

L2021558-26 L2021558-27

12:00 12:00

% Moisture (%)

Benzene (ug/g)

Ethylbenzene (ug/g)

Toluene (ug/g)

o-Xylene (ug/g)

m+p-Xylenes (ug/g)




F1 (C6-C10) (ug/g)

F1-BTEX (ug/g)

F2 (C10-C16) (ug/g)

F2-Naphth (ug/g)

F3 (C16-C34) (ug/g)

F3-PAH (ug/g)

F4 (C34-C50) (ug/g)





Acenaphthene (ug/g)


Acridine (ug/g)

Anthracene (ug/g)






Chrysene (ug/g)


Fluoranthene (ug/g)

Fluorene (ug/g)




18.1 17.6

<0.0068 <0.0068

<0.018 <0.018

<0.080 <0.080

<0.020 <0.020

<0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050

102.7 105.7

100.7 110.2

<5.0 <5.0

<5.0 <5.0

<10 <10

<10

<50 <50

<50

<50 <50

<72 <72

YES YES

72.0 79.5

102.4 105.1

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

Physical Tests


Hydrocarbons


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

8PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP01-02 TP01-05 TP02-05 TP02-06 TP03-03

L2021558-1 L2021558-2 L2021558-3 L2021558-4 L2021558-5

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (%)

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14 (%)

B(a)P Total Potency Equivalent (ug/g)

IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

84.0

83.8

<0.15

<0.46


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

9PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP03-06 TP04-01 TP04-04 TP05-02 TP05-04

L2021558-6 L2021558-7 L2021558-8 L2021558-9 L2021558-10

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)




IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010 <0.010

<0.030 <0.030

<0.050 <0.050

<0.050 <0.050

87.0 86.5

87.5 87.8

<0.15 <0.15

<0.46 <0.46


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

10PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP05-06 Z001 TP06-03 TP06-05 TP07-01

L2021558-11 L2021558-12 L2021558-13 L2021558-14 L2021558-15

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)




IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

87.4

86.5

<0.15

<0.46


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

11PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP07-05 TP08-02 TP08-06 TP09-01 TP09-04

L2021558-16 L2021558-17 L2021558-18 L2021558-19 L2021558-20

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)




IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

87.2

87.2

<0.15

<0.46


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

12PAGE of



15

SOIL


TP10-02 TP10-05 TP11-03 Z002 TP11-06

L2021558-21 L2021558-22 L2021558-23 L2021558-24 L2021558-25

12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)




IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

86.5

85.3

<0.15

<0.46


24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)


Client ID

Sampled Date

Grouping Analyte

Sampled Time


L2021558 CONTD....

13PAGE of



15

SOIL

SOIL SOIL09-NOV-17 09-NOV-17

TP12-01 TP12-05

L2021558-26 L2021558-27

12:00 12:00

Naphthalene (ug/g)

Phenanthrene (ug/g)

Pyrene (ug/g)

Quinoline (ug/g)




IACR (CCME) (ug/g)

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

88.0

87.2

<0.15

<0.46


Reference Information

VOCJ Soil jar was submitted as VOC sample container. VOC results may be biased low, and do not meet federal (CCME) or provincial requirements (for BC, AB-Tier1, MB, ON, SK).

Qualifiers for Individual Parameters Listed:

Description Qualifier

24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)

L2021558 CONTD....

14PAGE of

Additional Comments for Sample Listed:

Samplenum Matrix Sample Comments

L2021558-25

L2021558-25

Soil

Soil

Note: Volatile test was conducted on sample with headspace. Results may be biased low.Note: Volatile test was conducted on sample with headspace. Results may be biased low.

Report Remarks

BTX-511-HS-WT

F1-F4-511-CALC-WT

F1-HS-511-WT

F2-F4-511-WT

BTEX-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

F1-F4 Hydrocarbon Calculated Parameters

F1-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

F2-F4-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

BTX is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-GC/MS.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).

Analytical methods used for analysis of CCME Petroleum Hydrocarbons have been validated and comply with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC.

Hydrocarbon results are expressed on a dry weight basis.

In cases where results for both F4 and F4G are reported, the greater of the two results must be used in any application of the CWS PHC guidelines and the gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. In samples where BTEX and F1 were analyzed , F1-BTEX represents a value where the sum of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and total Xylenes has been subtracted from F1.

In samples where PAHs, F2 and F3 were analyzed, F2-Naphth represents the result where Naphthalene has been subtracted from F2. F3-PAH represents a result where the sum of Benzo(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, Fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene has been subtracted from F3.

Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F1 hydrocarbon range:1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met.2. Instrument performance showing response factors for C6 and C10 within 30% of the response factor for toluene.3. Linearity of gasoline response within 15% throughout the calibration range.

Unless otherwise qualified, the following quality control criteria have been met for the F2-F4 hydrocarbon ranges:1. All extraction and analysis holding times were met.2. Instrument performance showing C10, C16 and C34 response factors within 10% of their average.3. Instrument performance showing the C50 response factor within 30% of the average of the C10, C16 and C34 response factors.4. Linearity of diesel or motor oil response within 15% throughout the calibration range.

Fraction F1 is determined by extracting a soil or sediment sample as received with methanol, then analyzing by headspace-GC/FID.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (F2-F4 fractions) are extracted from soil with 1:1 hexane:acetone using a rotary extractor. Extracts are treated with silica gel to remove polar organic interferences. F2, F3, & F4 are analyzed by GC-FID. F4G-sg is analyzed gravimetrically.

Notes: 1. F2 (C10-C16): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC10 and nC16.2. F3 (C16-C34): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC16 and nC34.3. F4 (C34-C50): Sum of all hydrocarbons that elute between nC34 and nC50.4. F4G: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons5. F4G-sg: Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons (F4G) after silica gel treatment.6. Where both F4 (C34-C50) and F4G-sg are reported for a sample, the larger of the two values is used for comparison against the relevant CCME guideline for F4. 7. F4G-sg cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbon results to obtain an estimate of total extractable hydrocarbons. 8. This method is validated for use. 9. Data from analysis of validation and quality control samples is available upon request.10. Reported results are expressed as milligrams per dry kilogram, unless otherwise indicated.

ALS Test Code Test Description

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

SW846 8260

CCME CWS-PHC, Pub #1310, Dec 2001-S

E3398/CCME TIER 1-HS

CCME Tier 1

Method Reference** Matrix

Test Method References:


15

Reference Information 24-NOV-17 14:57 (MT)

L2021558 CONTD....

15PAGE of

MOISTURE-WT

PAH-CCME-WT

XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT

% Moisture

CCME PAHs

Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).

The procedure uses a mechanical shaking technique to extract a representative sub-sample with a mixture of methanol and toluene. The extract is analyzed by GC/MSD. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene.

Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.

Soil

Soil

Soil

Gravimetric: Oven Dried

SW846 8270

CALCULATION

** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.

The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:

Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location

WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMSSurrogate - A compound that is similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that does not occur naturally in environmental samples. Forapplicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of sample.mg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of sample.mg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight of sample.mg/L - milligrams per litre.< - Less than.D.L. - The reported Detection Limit, also known as the Limit of Reporting (LOR).N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.

Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

Chain of Custody Numbers:


15

Quality Control ReportPage 1 of

Client:

Contact:

Pottinger Gaherty Environmental 102 - 250 Water Street Whitby ON L1N 0G5Salima Jaffer

Report Date: 24-NOV-17Workorder: L2021558

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

BTX-511-HS-WT Soil

R3886035

R3886894

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

WG2663829-4

WG2663829-2

WG2663829-1

WG2663829-5

WG2664876-4

WG2664876-2

WG2663829-3

WG2663829-3

WG2664876-3

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

97.6

94.7

97.3

97.2

98.8

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

102.7

100.3

103.4

98.1

100.9

101.3

103.0

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

98.3

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

70-130

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

0.0068

0.018

0.03

0.02

0.08

50-140

50-140

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




BTX-511-HS-WT Soil

R3886894

R3888595

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

WG2664876-2

WG2664876-1

WG2664876-5

WG2665796-4

WG2665796-2

WG2665796-1

WG2664876-3

WG2665796-3

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene



Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

Benzene

Ethylbenzene

96.0

98.0

98.7

97.1

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

103.2

104.7

101.4

97.6

99.6

100.6

99.4

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

99.2

83.9

89.6

93.3

90.3

<0.0068

<0.018

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

40

40

40

40

40

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

<0.0068

<0.018

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

0.0068

0.018

0.03

0.02

0.08

50-140

50-140

0.0068

0.018

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




BTX-511-HS-WT

F1-HS-511-WT

Soil

Soil

R3888595

R3886035

R3886894

R3888595

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

WG2665796-1

WG2665796-5

WG2663829-4

WG2663829-2

WG2663829-1

WG2663829-7

WG2664876-4

WG2664876-2

WG2664876-1

WG2664876-7

WG2665796-4

WG2665796-2

WG2665796-3

WG2663829-3

WG2663829-6

WG2664876-3

WG2664876-6

WG2665796-3

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene



Benzene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)

Surrogate: 3,4-Dichlorotoluene

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)


F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)

<0.030

<0.020

<0.080

101.5

98.0

102.4

87.4

93.7

97.0

94.7

<5.0

92.9

<5.0

91.2

99.4

<5.0

101.8

<5.0

106.2

94.7

<5.0

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

30

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

80-120

60-140

80-120

60-140

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

%

ug/g

%

%

ug/g

%

ug/g

%

%

ug/g

<5.0

<5.0

<5.0

0.03

0.02

0.08

50-140

50-140

5

60-140

5

60-140

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




F1-HS-511-WT

F2-F4-511-WT

Soil

Soil

R3888595

R3893221

R3893366

Batch

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

WG2665796-2

WG2665796-1

WG2665796-7

WG2667254-4

WG2667254-2

WG2667254-1

WG2667254-5

WG2667568-4

WG2667568-2

WG2667568-1

WG2665796-6

WG2667254-3

WG2667254-3

WG2667568-3

F1 (C6-C10)

F1 (C6-C10)


F1 (C6-C10)

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

96.6

<5.0

104.9

84.9

<10

<50

<50

98.8

97.7

100.8

<10

<50

<50

92.3

102.8

103.9

106.3

<10

<50

<50

98.6

102.0

91.8

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

30

30

30

30

80-120

60-140

80-120

80-120

80-120

60-140

60-140

60-140

80-120

80-120

80-120

%

ug/g

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

<10

<50

<50

<10

<50

<50

5

60-140

10

50

50

60-140

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




F2-F4-511-WT

MOISTURE-WT

PAH-CCME-WT

Soil

Soil

Soil

R3893366

R3886814

R3888111

R3891531

R3892802

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

WG2667568-1

WG2667568-5

WG2664829-3

WG2664829-2

WG2664829-1

WG2665851-3

WG2665851-2

WG2665851-1

WG2667302-3

WG2667302-2

WG2667302-1

WG2666039-4

WG2667568-3

L2021558-1

L2023673-3

L2021558-10

WG2666039-3

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

Surrogate: 2-Bromobenzotrifluoride

F2 (C10-C16)

F3 (C16-C34)

F4 (C34-C50)

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

<10

<50

<50

87.3

90.9

93.8

86.2

17.7

99.9

<0.10

11.7

98.9

<0.10

19.9

98.5

<0.10

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

16-NOV-17

18-NOV-17

18-NOV-17

18-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

0.6

2.1

0.1

N/A

N/A

20

20

20

40

40

60-140

60-140

60-140

90-110

90-110

90-110

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

17.6

12.0

19.9

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

10

50

50

60-140

0.1

0.1

0.1

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




PAH-CCME-WT Soil

R3892802BatchDUP

LCS

WG2666039-4

WG2666039-2

WG2666039-3Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Acridine

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Quinoline

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Acridine

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene




Chrysene


Fluoranthene

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

99.7

98.6

99.2

93.7

92.1

100.6

93.1

98.9

97.6

98.8

105.1

101.9

98.1

93.0

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

40

40

50

40

40

40

50

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

50

50-140

50-140

60-130

60-130

50-140

60-130

60-130

60-140

50-140

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

9


Client:

Contact:




PAH-CCME-WT Soil

R3892802BatchLCS

MB

MS

WG2666039-2

WG2666039-1

WG2666039-5 WG2666039-3

Fluorene


Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Quinoline

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Acridine

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene




Chrysene


Fluoranthene

Fluorene


Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Quinoline

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

92.6

86.6

98.9

97.0

92.4

78.5

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.80

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.020

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.010

<0.030

<0.050

<0.050

85.4

82.3

88.6

87.8

87.4

83.1

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

60-130

60-130

50-130

60-130

60-130

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.8

0.05

0.05

0.02

0.05

0.05

0.02

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.01

0.03

0.05

0.05

50-140

50-140

9


Client:

Contact:




PAH-CCME-WT Soil

R3892802BatchMSWG2666039-5 WG2666039-3

Acridine

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene




Chrysene


Fluoranthene

Fluorene


Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Quinoline

83.0

89.4

90.2

96.3

90.8

81.0

93.7

92.4

88.0

89.0

82.4

83.9

88.7

88.2

86.3

68.0

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

22-NOV-17

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

9

Quality Control Report

Page 9 of


Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:


RPD-NA Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.

Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

Legend:

The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.

Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

Hold Time Exceedances:

All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.

ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.

Client:

Contact:


9

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:21 PM

ALS Sample ID: L2021558-1Client Sample ID: TP01-02

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:23 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 3:56:22 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:25 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:27 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:29 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:31 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:33 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:35 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:37 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 3:56:24 PM

ALS Sample ID: L2021558-12Client Sample ID: Z001

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:39 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:43 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:45 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:47 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:52 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:53 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:55 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:57 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 12:02:59 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:09 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:03 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:11 PM

ALS Sample ID: L2021558-24Client Sample ID: Z002

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:13 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:15 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

Printed on 11/23/2017 2:01:17 PM


2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Time - Minutes

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Response - M

illiVolts

[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]

13-NOV-17

Lab Work Order #: L2021556

Date Received:Pottinger Gaherty Environmental

102 - 250 Water StreetWhitby ON L1N 0G5

ATTN: Salima JafferFINAL 22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Report Date:

Version:

Certificate of Analysis

ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

____________________________________________

Mathy MahadevaAccount Manager

ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062

Client Phone: 905-668-4908

MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:

C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:

Result

22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed

Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90

L2021556 CONTD....2Page of

MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:

Guideline Limits

#1: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90

* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

4

L2021556-1 TCLPClient on 08-NOV-17 @ 12:00Sampled By:SoilMatrix: #1

Sample Preparation

Physical Tests

TCLP Extractables

TCLP Metals

Initial pHFinal pH

Air Velocity Of Fume HoodBurning RateIgnitability-Class

Samp Comment

Temperature Of Test MaterialTime To Ignition

Aroclor 1242Aroclor 1248Aroclor 1254Aroclor 1260Benzo(a)pyrene3&4-MethylphenolCresols (total)Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss2,4-Dichlorophenol2,4-DinitrotolueneFluoride (F)HexachlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethane2-MethylphenolNitrate and Nitrite as NNitrate-NNitrite-NNitrobenzeneTotal PCBsPentachlorophenol2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2,4,6-TrichlorophenolSurrogate: 2,4,6-TribromophenolSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl


Surrogate: Nitrobenzene d5Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Boron (B)

9.235.54

0.70N/A

NON FLAMMABLE

BROWN SOIL21.0N/A

<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.00020<0.010<0.015<0.10

<0.0050<0.0040

<10<0.0040<0.0040<0.0040<0.0050

<4.0<2.0<2.0

<0.0040<0.00040<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050<0.0050

94.988.4

88.8

87.4101.6

<0.050<0.50<2.5

0.100.10

0.100.010

1.01.0

0.000200.000200.000200.000200.000200.0100.0150.10

0.00500.0040

100.00400.00400.00400.0050

4.02.02.0

0.00400.000400.00500.00500.00500.005050-15040-160

40-160

50-15060-140

0.0500.502.5

pH unitspH units

m/secmm/secNo Unit

No Unit

Deg. Csec

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

%%

%

%%

mg/Lmg/Lmg/L

17-NOV-1717-NOV-17

21-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-1721-NOV-17

21-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-1721-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-1721-NOV-17

20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17

0.001

2002090

0.13150.00.130.53.0

1000

2.00.36

10.04000.5

2.5100500

Result

22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed

Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90

L2021556 CONTD....3Page of

MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01ANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:

Guideline Limits

#1: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, General Waste Control Regulation No. 347/90

* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

4

L2021556-1 TCLPClient on 08-NOV-17 @ 12:00Sampled By:SoilMatrix: #1

TCLP Metals

TCLP VOCs


Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Uranium (U)

1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzeneCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroformDichloromethaneMethyl Ethyl KetoneTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideSurrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene


<0.0050<0.050<0.050

<0.00010<0.025<0.0050<0.25

<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.025<0.10<0.50<1.0

<0.025<0.025<0.050100.8

99.4

0.00500.0500.050

0.000100.0250.00500.25

0.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.0250.100.501.0

0.0250.0250.050

70-130

70-130

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

%

%

20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1717-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17

20-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-1720-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

0.55.05.00.11.05.010

1.420.00.50.50.50.58105.0

200.035

0.2

Reference Information

MOOSE FACTORY ISLAND-PGL 3889-02.01 L2021556 CONTD....4Page of

22-NOV-17 12:28 (MT)

BNA-TCLP-WT

CN-TCLP-WTF-TCLP-WTHG-TCLP-WTIGNITABILITY-WT

LEACH-TCLP-WT

MET-TCLP-WT

N2N3-TCLP-WTPCB-TCLP-WTVOC-TCLP-WT

BNAs for O. Reg 347

Cyanide for O. Reg 347Fluoride (F) for O. Reg 347Mercury (CVAA) for O.Reg 347O. Reg 347 Ignitability

Leachate Procedure for Reg 347

O.Reg 347 TCLP Leachable MetalsNitrate/Nitrite-N for O. Reg 347PCBs for O. Reg 347VOC for O. Reg 347

Samples are leached according to TCLP protocol and then the aqueous leachate is extracted and the resulting extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD

Preliminary Screening Test:Prepare a sample "as received" 250 mm long by 20 mm wide by 10 mm high. Apply the tip of the flame to the end of the sample strip.If the sample is non-metallic, hold the flame tip on the sample until the sample ignites or for a maximum of 2 minutes. If combustion occurs, begin timing with a stop watch and note whether the sample propagates up to the 200 mm mark within the 2 minute test period.If the sample is metal or metal alloy powder, hold the flame tip on the sample until the sample ignites or for a maximum of 5 minutes. If combusiton occurs, begin timing with a stop watch and note whether the sample propagates up to the 200 mm mark within the 20 minute test period.Note: If the waste propagates burning of 200 mm of the test strip within 2 minutes (20 minutes for metals), the material must be evaluated by the burning rate test.Burning Rate Test:Refer to section 7.2 of EPA Method 1030. Samples that have a burning rate of greater than 2.2 mm/s are considered to have a positive result for ignitability according to DOT regulations. For metallic samples , the burning rate must be greater than 0.17 mm/s.

Inorganic and Semi-Volatile Organic contaminants are leached from waste samples in strict accordance with US EPA Method 1311, "Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure" (TCLP). Test results are reported in leachate concentration units (normally mg/L).

A sample of waste is leached in a zero headspace extractor at 30–2 rpm for 18–2.0 hours with the appropriate leaching solution. After tumbling the leachate is analyzed directly by headspace technology, followed by GC/MS using internal standard quantitation.

Methods Listed (if applicable):

ALS Test Code Test Description

Waste

WasteWasteWasteWaste

Waste

Waste

WasteWasteWaste

SW846 8270

APHA 4500CN C EAPHA 4110 B-Ion ChromatographySW846 7470AEPA SW846, Method 1030, 1996

EPA 1311

EPA 200.8

APHA 4110 B-Ion ChromatographySW846 8270SW846 8260

Method Reference***

*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.

Matrix

GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS

Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.

Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information.

The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:

Chain of Custody numbers:

Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location

WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

4


Client:

Contact:




BNA-TCLP-WT Waste

R3892041BatchDUP

LCS

MB

WG2667075-5

WG2667075-2

WG2667075-1

WG2667075-32,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol


2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

2-Methylphenol

3&4-Methylphenol

Benzo(a)pyrene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol



2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

2-Methylphenol

3&4-Methylphenol

Benzo(a)pyrene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Pentachlorophenol




2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0040

<0.0050

<0.010

<0.00020

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0050

114.6

107.9

104.7

97.7

121.2

75.8

74.2

101.3

94.3

86.8

73.2

92.0

140.3

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0040

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

50-150

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

40-130

40-130

60-140

50-160

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0050

<0.0040

<0.0050

<0.010

<0.00020

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0050

0.005

0.005

0.005

0.005

0.004

0.005

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




BNA-TCLP-WT

CN-TCLP-WT

Waste

Waste

R3892041

R3891527

Batch

Batch

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

WG2667075-1

WG2667075-4

WG2667261-3

WG2667261-2

WG2667261-1

WG2667075-3

L2021501-1

2-Methylphenol

3&4-Methylphenol

Benzo(a)pyrene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

Surrogate: Nitrobenzene d5


Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol




2,4-Dichlorophenol

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

2-Methylphenol

3&4-Methylphenol

Benzo(a)pyrene

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Hexachloroethane

Nitrobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss



<0.0050

<0.010

<0.00020

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0040

<0.0050

82.9

83.4

94.8

86.6

114.6

101.3

98.1

92.6

113.6

70.7

68.7

97.4

85.7

70.0

61.7

86.0

135.6

<0.10

107.2

<0.10

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

N/A 20

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

40-150

40-150

40-150

50-150

50-150

70-130

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

<0.10

0.005

0.01

0.0002

0.004

0.004

0.004

0.004

0.005

50-150

40-160

60-140

50-150

0.1

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




CN-TCLP-WT

F-TCLP-WT

HG-TCLP-WT

MET-TCLP-WT

Waste

Waste

Waste

Waste

R3891527

R3891885

R3887406

R3888741

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

WG2667261-4

WG2667418-3

WG2667418-2

WG2667418-1

WG2667418-4

WG2666240-3

WG2666240-2

WG2666240-1

WG2666240-4

WG2667032-4

WG2667032-2

L2021501-1

L2021501-1

L2021501-1

L2022280-1

L2022280-1

WG2667032-3


Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Silver (Ag)

Arsenic (As)

Boron (B)

Barium (Ba)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Lead (Pb)

Selenium (Se)

Uranium (U)

102.2

<10

93.3

<10

97.5

<0.00010

98.0

<0.00010

94.7

<0.0050

<0.050

<2.5

<0.50

<0.0050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.025

<0.25

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

50

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

50-150

70-130

50-150

70-130

50-140

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

<10

<0.00010

<0.0050

<0.050

<2.5

<0.50

<0.0050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.025

<0.25

10

0.0001

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




MET-TCLP-WT

N2N3-TCLP-WT

Waste

Waste

R3888741

R3891885

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

WG2667032-2

WG2667032-1

WG2667032-5

WG2667418-3

WG2667032-3

L2021501-1

Silver (Ag)

Arsenic (As)

Boron (B)

Barium (Ba)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Lead (Pb)

Selenium (Se)

Uranium (U)

Silver (Ag)

Arsenic (As)

Boron (B)

Barium (Ba)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Lead (Pb)

Selenium (Se)

Uranium (U)

Silver (Ag)

Arsenic (As)

Boron (B)

Barium (Ba)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Lead (Pb)

Selenium (Se)

Uranium (U)

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N

102.3

99.9

96.7

105.3

99.6

99.1

102.1

95.4

100.6

<0.0050

<0.050

<2.5

<0.50

<0.0050

<0.050

<0.050

<0.025

<0.25

133.5

107.6

97.0

109.3

109.2

100.8

103.9

105.7

106.4

<2.0

<2.0

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

30

30

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

<2.0

<2.0

0.005

0.05

2.5

0.5

0.005

0.05

0.05

0.025

0.25

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




N2N3-TCLP-WT

PCB-TCLP-WT

Waste

Waste

R3891885

R3891859

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MB

MS

WG2667418-2

WG2667418-1

WG2667418-4

WG2667472-4

WG2667472-2

WG2667472-1

WG2667472-6

WG2667472-5

L2021501-1

WG2667472-3

WG2667472-3

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N

Nitrate-N

Nitrite-N

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260


Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260


Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1254

100.9

98.3

<2.0

<2.0

102.8

98.1

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

74.7

84.4

107.3

104.6

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

89.4

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

97.6

67.1

104.1

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

21-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

50

50

50

50

70-130

70-130

50-150

50-150

65-130

65-130

65-130

65-130

50-150

50-150

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

<0.00020

2

2

0.0002

0.0002

0.0002

0.0002

40-160

0.0002

0.0002

0.0002

0.0002

40-160

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




PCB-TCLP-WT

VOC-TCLP-WT

Waste

Waste

R3891859

R3887124

Batch

Batch

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

WG2667472-5

WG2656319-4

WG2656319-1

WG2656319-2

WG2667472-3

L2021415-11

Aroclor 1260

1,1-Dichloroethylene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Carbon tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chloroform

Dichloromethane

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Tetrachloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

Vinyl chloride


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene


Chlorobenzene

Chloroform

Dichloromethane

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Tetrachloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

Vinyl chloride


103.0

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.10

<0.50

<1.0

<0.025

<0.025

<0.050

87.9

99.6

96.5

101.5

99.0

98.5

99.1

98.8

97.1

96.1

100.0

101.1

84.1

<0.025

21-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50-150

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

50-150

70-130

70-130

60-130

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.10

<0.50

<1.0

<0.025

<0.025

<0.050

0.025

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

8


Client:

Contact:




VOC-TCLP-WT Waste

R3887124BatchMB

MS

WG2656319-2

WG2656319-5 L2021415-11

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene


Chlorobenzene

Chloroform

Dichloromethane

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Tetrachloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

Vinyl chloride




1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene


Chlorobenzene

Chloroform

Dichloromethane

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Tetrachloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

Vinyl chloride

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.025

<0.10

<0.50

<1.0

<0.025

<0.025

<0.050

98.1

99.8

80.3

99.8

101.4

99.99

98.6

94.1

99.95

100.0

98.1

104.6

95.2

99.1

72.8

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

17-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

20-NOV-17

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

0.025

0.025

0.025

0.025

0.025

0.025

0.1

0.5

1

0.025

0.025

0.05

70-130

70-130

8

Quality Control Report

Page 8 of


Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:


RPD-NA Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.

Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

Legend:

The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.

Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

Hold Time Exceedances:

All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.

ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.

Client:

Contact:


8

supplemental soil investigation

Documents