summer miller hilites 2010

8/9/2019 Summer Miller Hilites 2010

1/8

I N S I D ET H I S I S S U E

1 New EPA Ruling

Charleston Office Moves

Louisiana Office Moving Soon

2 The Year in Review 2009

3 2009 Appalachian Regional

Reforestation Initiative

4 24-Hour Emergency Response

5 Brian Parker to Serve as

Vice-Chairman

2010 Transportation ResearchBoard Environment and

Energy Research Conference

Virginia DEQ State Lead

Contract Awarded

Energy Mineral Law

Foundation

6 A Five-Year Saga Comes to

an End and MM&A Brings

the Water Home to Iluka

Resources

New EPA Ruling for Underground

Coal MinesOn June 28, 2010, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, signed subpart FF (Underground Coal Mines)

into effect as part of the Mandatory Reporting Rule (MRR). Beginning January 2011 and reporting

in March 2012, Underground Coal mines will now have to report CH4 emissions under the MRR. It

appears that at least quarterly sampling and analysis of CH4 data will be required of all Ventilation

Air Methane (VAM), degas, and Coalbed Methane (CBM) efforts. For more information go to:

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html

Charleston Office MovesCharleston staff members moved into their

new offices on June 25. The new address

for this office is: 601 Morris Street, Suite 204,

Charleston, WV 25301, Tel: (304) 344-3970, Fax:

(304) 344-3986.

The new office is across from the

Appalachian Power Park, the new home of theSouth Atlantic League West Virginia Power.

Louisiana Office Moving

SoonThis August, Shreveport staff are making a

move to be more centrally located. This move

will provide for the expansion of the office to

better serve the needs of our clients. The new

address for the Shreveport office will be: 910Pierremont Road, Suite 117, Shreveport, LA

71106, Tel: (318) 848-4848, Fax: (318) 848-4849.

Marshall Miller & Associates

ranked a top 500 engineering firm in ENR

magazine for the eleventh year in a row!

For more information regarding

any news story, contact Tracy

Paine at (804) 314-1684 or e-mail

at

tracy.paine@mma1

.com

MILLER HILITESI S S U E 0 2 1 S U M M E R 2 0 1 0

Office Locations in KS, KY, LA, NC, PA, TN, VA, WV


2/8 www.mma1.com MILLER HILITES

2

The Year in Review 2009By Steven M. Carpenter, Corporate Risk Manager/Director - CarbonManagement

This summer, the American Bar Association, Section of Environment,

Energy and Resources, in conjunction with the National Energy Environment Law and Policy Institute at the University of Tulsa College of

Law, Marshall Miller & Associates Carbon and Environmental staff werehonored to author and edit the Site Remediation section of the annual

report. The report was edited by Steve Carpenter and co-authored by KhalilPorter and Amy Hendershot. The following is a summary of the section.

With the passage of the 2009 Stimulus Bill, the issuance of the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Mandatory Reporting of GreenhouseGases Rule (MRR) in September, additions made to the MRR this past

spring to include the Oil & Gas industry as well as the Carbon Capture andStorage systems, along with a lackluster December at the United Nations

Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, 2009 proved to be a year of

environmental consciousness among many Americans and the rest of theworld. Within the environmental industry, there is a constant battle to dowhats best for the environment, and the reality of a lack of funding to do so.

Not surprisingly, the economic uncertainty surrounding the real estateand manufacturing industries contributed to a significant slowdown in

remedial activity with almost half of remediation firms reporting flat tonegative revenue growth between 2008 and 2009. On the other hand, almostthree quarters of firms reporting any increase in remedial activity at the

federal, state, and local levels, were likely a result of the economic stimuluspackage.

The environmental industry is late to the information age; however, thereis a growing trend towards capturing, storing, transferring, and visualizing

site data into actionable, decisive digital information. Access to easilyunderstood site information facilitates communication among key parties

and provides real-time quality assurance to field activities, as well asongoing project budget controls not available to the traditional waiting forthe lab analysis approach. Most consulting firms have implemented some

degree of digital record keeping and visualization tools. However, thesetools remain an area where much is needed in terms of standardization,

efficiency, and cost control.

The global marketplace is expending a great deal of effort in understanding

and implementing concepts of sustainability. These efforts have beenextended to the field of site remediation on a number of fronts. Leading the

effort primarily in, but not limited to, the United States is the Sustainable

Remediation Forum (SuRF). Additionally, measures have been taken atEPA, state, and project levels to implement elements of sustainability

when considering options for site remediation, including lowering theoverall carbon footprint and considering the social impact of the remedial

activities. Specific actions taken include the use of alternative energysources, requiring the use of low-sulfur or biodiesel fuels for equipment, and

minimizing the transportation activities associated with site remediation.

With the 2009 U.S. economy in a state of crisis rivaling that of the Great

Depression, President Obama signed the Stimulus Bill into law in February2009. In addition to prioritizing education and lowering healthcare costs, the

Stimulus Bill also allocated moneys to environmental cleanup projects wh

would in turn create new green jobs that would be higher paying and counot be outsourced.

The Stimulus Bill allocated $18.8 billion for environmental projects relateto clean water, flood control, and environmental remediation; $7.22 billion

those funds will be administered by the EPA for its programs that protect

and promote both green jobs and a healthier environment. The EPA is givpriority to projects that can be started and completed expeditiously, which

will likely give new life to environmental projects that were shovel-ready bunable to receive funding.

From the EPA budget, $600 million is to be used for the remediation ofsuperfund sites and uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites tha

threaten human health and the environment. As of December 28, 2009, theEPA had 1,270 sites on its National Priority List, generally considered the

most contaminated sites in the nation. Many Superfund sites are ready forconstruction, but lacked funding due to budget shortfalls. Over 600 sites wongoing construction could be accelerated. As the ramped-up spending

allows more of the Superfund sites to be remediated, there is also the

potential for the EPA to increase its litigation efforts to recoup the cleanupcosts from the responsible parties.

The EPA will administer $100 million in competitive grants to evaluate

and remediate Brownfield sites (former industrial and commercialsites contaminated with hazardous components which complicate the

redevelopment or reuse of the site). In 2008, the EPA was only able to fund37% of its Brownfield applications. The stimulus moneys are aimed atremediating more of these sites to take them from problem properties to

productive community use.

The Stimulus Bill also allocated $200 million to the EPA for cleanup

of petroleum from leaking underground storage tank (UST) systems atapproximately 1,600 additional sites. As of September 2009, the EPA had

confirmed over 488,000 UST releases. There are an estimated 116,000 siteswith the potential to contaminate important water supplies.

As the EPA moves the designated funds to the state level, Americans wilbe able to see the stimulus moneys impacting their environment by cleani

up their local neighborhoods. As the EPA Administrator Jackson noted, it iperfect example of economic growth and environmental protection work

hand in hand to the benefit of all Americans.

The utilization of nanomaterials as a contaminated site remediation tool

rapidly gaining momentum in the environmental cleanup industry. The timeand cost required for cleanup has a significant influence on the remediatistrategy, particularly considering the current state of the U.S. economy.

Nanomaterials have proven to have the potential to reduce the costs and

time of remediating contaminated sites, as well as eliminate the need fortreatment and removal of contaminated media in the cleanup process.

The application of nanomaterials at contaminated sites is still in its infan

but is rapidly evolving. The production of nanomaterials for remediation istrending to increase significantly over the next decade. The most recent

advances in nanomaterial technology are the ability to design and producmaterials that are geared for specific remedial solutions, and eliminate thgeneration of undesirable remediation byproducts.



3

Nanotechnology is defined as the understanding and control of matter

at dimensions between approximately one and one hundred nanometers,where unique phenomena enable . . . properties not commonly displayedby particles of the same material at a macroscale. One nanometer is

one billionth of a meter. Nano-sized particles have large surface areasrelative to their volumes and may have enhanced chemical and biological

reactivity. This allows for increased contact with contaminants, therebyresulting in rapid reduction of contaminant concentrations. Because of

their minute size, nanomaterials may pervade very small spaces in thesubsurface and remain suspended in groundwater, which would allow the

particles to travel farther than macro-sized particles and achieve widerdistribution.

Despite high performance and low cost potential of nanomaterialremediation, there are unanswered questions regarding the fate andtransport of remaining free nanomaterials in the environment. The EPA has

suggested that further research is needed to understand whether theyare persistent, and if they have toxicological effects on various biological

systems. Nevertheless, nanomaterials are being applied at an increasingnumber of sites with varying geologies, resulting in a large number of the

sites meeting remediation goals.

2009 Appalachian Regional

Reforestation Initiative (ARRI) Award

Tim Probert (left) MM&A senior scientist/forester is pictured with KeithPorterfield, Assistant Director, WVDEP from the Oak Hill Regional office,at an Arbor Day/ tree planting event on reclaimed surface-mined lands ofCliffs Natural Resources near Pineville, WV.

Tim Probert, Senior Project Scientist/Forester with the Environmental

Science Department in Bluefield, Virginia recently received the 2009 WestVirginia State Award for Excellence in Reforestation. This award waspresented by Thomas Shope, Director, Appalachian Regional Office, United

States Department of the Interiors Office of Surface Mining during an ArboDay celebration and tree planting event attended by several federal and

state local agencies and dignitaries. Also on hand were local environmentand watershed groups and students from Wyoming County high schools.

The event was held on reclaimed surface mined lands presently owned byCliffs Natural Resources near Pineville, WV.

Tim was also recognized at the 2010 Joint Mining Reclamation Conferencheld in Pittsburgh, PA on June 8th, during an awards luncheon sponsored

by the Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative group. He waspresented this award for exemplary performance incorporating the ForestReclamation Approach (FRA) during surface mine reclamation. The FRA

includes 5 basic steps, which include: 1) Creating a suitable rooting mediufor good tree growth that is no less than four feet deep and comprised of

topsoil, weathered sandstone and/or the best available material; 2) Looselygrading the minesoil established in step one to create a non-compacted

growth medium; 3) Using ground covers that are compatible with growingtrees; 4) Planting early successional tree species for wildlife and soilstability and commercially valuable crop trees; and 5) Using proper tree

planting techniques.

Tim has a B.S. degree in Forest Resource Management and an M.S. in

Forestry from West Virginia University. He has over 25 years of experiencein forest management, environmental science and reforestation of surface

mined lands in West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia. Tim has been involvedin reforestation research on surface mined lands, co-authoring research

papers and articles, and has spoken at conferences and workshops onthe topic of reforestation. He has been closely involved with the evolutionof forestland planting plans, permitting and oversight of post-mining

reforestation for many coal company clients since the mid 1980s and helpeadvance and apply the fundamentals of the FRA among coal clients he has

served, including the push to plant more commercially valuable hardwoodspecies on reclaimed mine sites. Through his employment with Pocahonta

Land Corporation, Wagner Forest Management, Gaddy Engineeringand Marshall Miller & Associates, he has worked on over 50 forestlandplanting plans that are in various stages of restoring over 20,000 of acres o

reclaimed surface mined land to forests. His efforts have helped reestablisroughly 10 million trees on surface mines throughout the Appalachian

coalfields where he has worked.

Tim is a member of the West Virginia Chapter of Allegheny Society of

American Foresters (WVSAF) and is Chairman of the Woodlands Award

Committee, which recognizes the efforts of coal companies that arefollowing the FRA approach. Through the reclamation process, thesecompanies are establishing productive sites for commercially valuable

forests to be reestablished on surface mined lands in West Virginia.Congratulations Tim!



4

24-Hour Emergency ResponseDanny Mullins, Emergency Response Coordinator

The MM&A Bluefield Emergency Response program finished strong in 2009

and continues to be on a steady pace for 2010. Our ER teams responded toover 80 incidents in 2009 ranging from tractor-trailer accidents to dielectric

fluid releases.

One incident included approximately 80 gallons of diesel being released in

a truck stop parking lot. MM&A remediated a 120x100 area of asphalt and

returned the parking lot to service.

At another location, a client noticed a sheen in a creek and notified MM&A.After an extensive investigation, a leaking underground tank was discoveredthat still contained heating oil. MM&A removed product from the creek using

absorbent materials and installed a temporary recovery well in the subsurfacecontaminant plume. The client subsequently recovered over 3,000 gallons of

oil/water mixture.

At another ER site, a power pole snapped in half and dropped a transformeronto a road due to a winter storm. Dielectric fluid that potentially contained

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) was released from the transformer. Thedielectric fluid splashed the surrounding area and spread across the road.

MM&A quickly remediated the spill and allowed the road to be reopened.

MM&A responded to a paint spill at a local truck stop. The freight located a

the rear of a tractor trailer collapsed and damaged containers of one-gallonpaint cans. Several gallons of paint spilled in the trailer then leaked onto the

parking lot. MM&A removed the damaged freight and placed it on plasticsheeting. The freight and trailer were cleaned. The trailer was then restockeand prepared for further transportation.

MM&A responded to an incident that involved a fire at a wood chipper.

The fire burned a fuel line connection, and this resulted in a release ofapproximately 70 gallons of diesel onto a storage lot and into several piles o

sawdust. MM&A remediated the site and contained all impacted materials fdisposal.

MM&A responded to a highway traffic accident involving a tractor-trailer trthat was hauling a double-wide trailer. The truck lost control and went over embankment. MM&A remediated diesel-impacted soil and also disposed of

four roll-off boxes of debris.

With continuing business development efforts and current client relationshi

the future of Emergency Response services for MM&A looks bright. Thanksall who have contributed to ERs this past year.



5

Brian Parker to Serve As Vice-Chairman of

the Environmental Committee for the Virginia

Transportation Construction Alliance (VTCA)Our own Brian Parker, P.E., Mining Engineer, was elected as by the VTCA

to serve as the Vice-Chairman of its environmental committee. Brians mainrole is to be a representative of the VTCA. In addition, he will attend and

assist in leading VTCA meetings on discussions of important regulatoryissues associated with the aggregate industry and state and federal

agencies. After 2 years, Brian will become the chairman of the committee,which will require a greater responsibility in identifying industry issues andcollectively finding resolutions with the rest of the VTCA members.

2010 Transportation Research Board

Environment and Energy Research ConferenceBetter Delivery of Better Transportation Solutions - June 6-9, 2010, Raleigh,

North Carolina.

Over 400 forward-thinking transportation, environmental, and planning

professionals met at this highly interactive workshop to participate in tracks that included planning, process, application/delivery, and data/information

management. MM&A was proud to be a bronze sponsor of the event andMike Kinder submitted an abstract regarding MM&As work with MetrorailWashington Airport Authority (MMWA).

Energy Mineral Law FoundationBy Steven M. Carpenter, Corporate Risk Manager/Director - CarbonManagement

This past winter, Steve Carpenter, Corporate Risk Manager and Director ofMarshall Miller & Associates Carbon Management division was elected

a Trustee-at-large for the Energy Mineral Law Foundation (EMLF). It didnttake long for the EMLF to recruit Steve into action. In early August, theEMLF, in conjunction with the WVU College of Law will hold two Law Short

Courses: Coal Law and Climate Change. Steve, joined by Blair McGill, VicePresident and General Manager of Patriots Federal No. 2 Mine, will chair

the opening session with an introduction to coal, coal geology and miningfor the Coal Law Short Course.

The second course, Climate Change, will focus on the many technical, legal,and international aspects of climate change, including carbon sequestration

and carbon footprints. Steve will open and lead the section on carbonCapture and Storage and the Future Use of Coal in his session The Scienceof CO2 Capture and Geologic Storage. Later in the course, Steve will join

Seth Rice, with the firm of Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir of Pittsburghto present Greenhouse Gas Reporting and will address the U.S. EPAs

greenhouse gas reporting regulations and the practical implications ofregulated facilities.

A full list of the speakers and events can be found at:

http://emlf.org/

http://www.emlf.org/Content/images/Coal_10/coal_lowresw.pdf

http://www.emlf.org/Content/images/Climate/climate_lowres.pdf

Virginia DEQ State Lead

Contract AwardedOn July 1, 2010, Marshall Miller and Associates (MM&A) was awarded thre

regional contracts from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) entitled Investigation and Remediation of Petroleum Contamination(State Lead). The scope involves on call professional investigative andremediation services related to petroleum contamination from undergroun

storage tanks. The initial term is two years with renewable options for up tove years.

The DEQ projects pertain to sites in which no responsible party exists or thresponsible party is unwilling/unable to take action. The services include

emergency response clean-up, site characterization, corrective actionplanning/implementation and developing alternate water supplies.

MM&A has a long history of working with DEQ personnel in the petroleum

program and has also worked directly for the DEQ on individual orders in th

past. These State Lead contracts will further our relationship with DEQ andprovide a mechanism to perform a greater number of petroleum investigati

projects. The Ashland and Blueeld Virginia ofces will primarily servicethese contracts.

Abandoned USTs found using geophysical techniques



6

By Eric Powers, C.P.G., Senior Scientist

Its been more than five years since Iluka asked MM&A to find and developa reliable water supply for its then-proposed Brink, Virginia mineral sandsmining operation. From the beginning, it was apparent that finding such a supply

would not be easy and would likely come from more than one source. Aninitial scoping study conducted by MM&A in late 2004 confirmed that although

there were numerous choices, it was clear that a dual source consisting ofgroundwater and surface water would likely be required. Studies conducted by

other consultants in the early 1990s confirmed that limited groundwater suppliesexisted beneath the site -- although extracting them would likely require a largearray of wells spaced over a large area. In addition, MM&As evaluation of the

nearby Meherrin River found that although its hydrology was as good or betterthan the Nottoway River, which supplies Ilukas other Virginia operations, there

would nevertheless be seasonal periods when withdrawals would be prohibited.

Because of these preliminary findings, MM&A recommended that Iluka pursue

a dual supply alternative to provide for the proposed mining operations. By2005, Iluka hired MM&A to begin exploring and testing groundwater supplies

within its already leased Brink, Virginia mine site. Over the next three years,numerous test wells were drilled across the site, with many of them yieldingcommercial quantities of water. At the same time, Iluka had MM&A look at using

discharge water from a nearby granite quarry as a potential water source toaugment the groundwater. MM&A conducted a study of the alternative, looking

at the reliability of the quarry discharge as well as the feasibility of obtainingeasements to lay a pipe from the quarry to the mine. However, by mid-2006 it

became apparent that the quarry supply would prove too unreliable to serveIlukas needs. Left with the Meherrin River as the only tenable surface water

alternative, Iluka sent MM&A out once again to find an intake location andpipeline route to extend a water line from the river to the plant.

By 2007, MM&A identified a pipeline route for the river intake, confirmedenough groundwater reserves to make mining the brink site feasible andeasements were secured with landowners along the route. Preparations were

made to move forward with the mine based on the groundwater supply alone,with the intention of bringing on the Meherrin supply in the future. In early 2008,

MM&A signed a contract with Iluka to construct the entire Brink well fieldincluding all wells, pumping systems, controls and telemetry along with 68,000

feet of piping required to connect the wells with the concentrator plant and apotable water system for the plant. Iluka also tasked MM&A to assist it withobtaining permits to site an intake on the Meherrin River and to connect it to the

plant via 38,000 feet of piping.The well field project proved to be the largest design/build construction

contract ever undertaken by MM&A, requiring the efforts of a multi-disciplinedteam of geologists, engineers, permitting specialists and an array of construction

contractors to get the job done. The largest of the subcontracts went toDinwiddie Deep Well Drilling (DDWD) who had already supported MM&A in

drilling all of the test wells at Brink and in supporting MM&As construction ofanother well field for Ilukas Concord, VA operations in Sussex County. DDWD

had the equipment,

experience and expertiseto undertake the complextask of building the system

across the entire mine site,which covered more than

2,000 acres. Also on theteam was Hughes SupplyCompany (HSC), which has

teamed with MM&A formany years in providing

electrical design services.HSC provided design

services and equipment

to provide the 28 wellhead panels and telemetry required to make the system operate. Mecklenbur

Electric Cooperative also subcontracted to MM&A to construct 7.2 miles ofelectrical lines and service entrances to supply the well pumps with electricity

After nine months of construction, the well field was completed in Decembe2008. The commissioning test confirmed that the system was capable of

supplying the mine with enough water (over 500,000 gallons per day) to operatunder normal conditions and the first water flowed from the well field into the

Brink process water ponds on December 12, 2008. By early April of 2009 the wfield system was in full operation supporting the first ore production from theBrink facility.

Even as the Brink well field was brought online, the need for a backup sourc

of water remained, since MM&As earlier testing indicated that a prolongeddrought would diminish the well fields ability to provide the mine with enoughwater. As the well field project was brought to a close, Iluka once again came

to MM&A to secure the Meherrin River water supply. Although the permittingprocess for the intake and wetland portions of the corridor were still in proces

in early 2009, Iluka mobilized its own resources to build as much of the pipelinas possible while its own field crews were available to do the work. MM&A

had already managed the import of over 36,000 feet of surplus high densitypolyethylene (HDPE) pipe from Ilukas Georgia and Florida operations and wasresponsible for managing the construction of the river pipeline and intake. Thi

included all design work and the construction of a suspension bridge to bringthe pipeline across Fountains Creek, a floating section across a beaver pond o

Falling Run, and jack and bore crossings of Mill Road and Dry Bread Road.

Construction on the Meherrin pipeline began during the frigid month of Janu

2009. Under MM&As direction, Ilukas field services crews heat-fused 27,500feet of 12- to 24-inch diameter HDPE pipe, clearing and pulling it through roug

terrain and across a variety of obstacles including farmland, wetlands, highpressure gas mains, under high-tension power lines, under roadways andthrough dense forest and brush. Many segments of the pipe required burial

under obstacles or had to be supported above them. Also required were mult

A Five-Year Saga Comes To An End and MM&A

Brings The Water Home To Iluka Resources



7

air relief valves and gate valves to control the movement of water through the

miles of pipe. Multiple crews worked 10 hour days, six days a week to bring thepipeline to near completion by early April 2009.

Another year of negotiations and permitting was required before Iluka couldconstruct the river intake in the Emporia Reservoir, just above Emporia Dam,

and build the final crossing over Fountains Creek. During the brutally cold winter

of 2010, MM&A and Iluka worked together once again to bring the projectto completion. While Iluka secured a contractor to construct the Meherrin

River intake, MM&A hunkered down in its Ashland, Virginia warehouse andfabricated the Fountains Creek suspension bridge components. Based on

MM&As engineered design, the bridge required the machining and assemblyof over 5,000 pounds of structural steel beams, rebar, cable and fasteners. In

early March, the entire steel structure was disassembled, hauled out of thewarehouse into the snow and transported to Petersburg, VA to be hot-dipgalvanized. By April, MM&A had mobilized the equipment and materials to the

site, which was readied for construction. Over a three week period, MM&Asconstruction crew, with assistance from DDWD and Iluka, improved access

roads leading to the swampy site and brought in over 30 yards of concrete toconstruct the cable anchors and tower foundations. Once the concrete work

was complete, the steel towers were reassembled and erected on the concretefoundations. On April 19th the remaining 12-inch segment of HDPE pipe waslifted into place bridging the final gap between the plant and the Meherrin River.

Iluka selected the Electrical Contracting firm of Chewning and Wilmer toconstruct the river intake with MM&A providing project management and

engineering design. MM&As engineering design team had specified a floatingscreen intake connected to a 100-horsepower electric centrifugal pump, which

would discharge directly to the pipeline Iluka had constructed earlier. The pumpand associated Hydroblast cleaning system are located inside a 12 by 24-foot

chain link compound next to the Emporia Reservoir. All critical electrical andcontrol systems are housed in an 8 by 8-foot prefabricated fiberglass shed,while the pump itself sits outside the building on a gravel pad. A 480-volt three-

phase power supply was constructed by Dominion Power to drive the system,which is remote controlled at the Brink plant via telephone telemetry. Ilukas

field services crew assembled and installed the screen and floating intake andafter a month of construction the system was activated and tested for three

days. As expected, the pump easily extracted the water from the river, drivingit through nearly 38,000 feet of pipe to the Brink facilities at a rate of nearly 950gallons per minute.

Iluka now has a complete water system that should deliver sufficient waterto its Brink mining facilities, even under drought conditions. The project

proved rewarding for many of us at MM&A since it gave us the opportunityto demonstrate our full range of capabilities including geology, hydrology,

engineering design, wetland science, permitting, construction and construction

management. Although there were numerous challenges along the way, theMM&A team, in partnership with Ilukas management and staff, were able toconceive, design and construct a system that should serve the mine well over its

entire lifespan.


8/8

MISSION

SHREVEPORT

LEXINGTON

KINGSPORT

ASHLAND

CHARLESTON

BECKLEY

BLUEFIELD

RALEIGH

CAMP HILL

H E A D Q U A R T E R S , V A534 Industrial Park Road

Bluefield, VA 24605(p) 276.322.5467 (f) 276.322.1510

(e) [email protected]

K A N S A S5700 Broadmoor Suite 504

Mission, KS 66202(p) 913.648.4424 (f) 913.648.4763


K E N T U C K Y5480 Swanton DriveLexington, KY 40509

(p) 859.263.2855 (f) 859.263.2839(e) [email protected]

L O U I S I A N A910 Pierremont Road, Suite 117

Shreveport, LA 71106(p) 318.848.4848 (f) 318.848.4849


N O R T H C A R O L I N A5900 Triangle DriveRaleigh, NC 27617

(p) 919.786.1414 (f) 919.786.1418(e)[email protected]

P E N N S Y L V A N I A3913 Hartzdale Dr, Suite 1306

Camp Hill, PA 17011(p) 717.730.7810 (f) 717.730.7812


T E N N E S S E E10376 Wallace Alley Street

Kingsport, TN 37663(p) 423.279.9775 (f) 423.279.9777


V I R G I N I A10988 Richardson Road

Ashland, VA 23005(p) 804.798.6525 (f) 804.798.5907


W E S T V I R G I N I A601 Morris Street, Suite 204

Charleston, WV 25301(p) 304.344.3970 (f) 304.344.3986


200 George Street, Suite 6Beckley, WV 25801

(p) 304.255.8937 (f) 304.255.8939(e) [email protected]

MILLER HILITI S S U E 0 2 1 S U M M E R 2

O F F I C E L O C A T I

MARSHALL MILLER & ASSOCIATES3 4 I N D U S T R I A L P A R K R O A D

B L U E F I E L D , V A 2 4 6 0 5

summer miller hilites 2010

Documents