summary of the last lecture. magnetic circuits compare this formula with ohm’s law in electric...

24
c l F H Summary of the last lecture H B . A B. i N F . A l c . F

Post on 19-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

cl

FH

Summary of the last lecture

HB .

AB.

iNF .

A

lc

.F

Page 2: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Magnetic circuits

FA

lc

Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Riv A

lR

Page 3: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

gg

gggg

cc

cccc

gggccc

gc

A

lAH

A

lAHiN

ABABiN

FiN

.....

.....

...

ggcc lHlHFiN ...

Another useful formula in a series situation

Page 4: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Problem 1-8

1500r

Assume 4% increase in effective Cross-sectional areafor fringing effect

Calculate the flux density in each of the legs A

lc

Page 5: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:
Page 6: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:
Page 7: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:
Page 8: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Magnetic Behaviour of Ferromagnetic Materials

We talked about Ferromagnetic materials, such as iron, steel, cobalt, nickel and some alloys. They have a high relative permeability (2000-6000). In magnetic circuit theory we assumed:

HB . where is a constant.

Page 9: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

By this assumption we have assumed a linear relation, i.e.:

This means in a coil if I increase the current to twice as much, the flux will be twice as much as well. This is what we call linear relation.

Page 10: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

But the reality is different. These are typical curves.We have saturation.

HB .

AB. FiNlH c ..

Page 11: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Typical B-H curve of steel

Page 12: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Typical ur-H curve of steel

Page 13: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Now, can we solve the problems knowing these curves ?

In some problems, instead of giving the relative permeability, they produce the B-H curve.In these cases, the operating condition (Bo-Ho), should be

known somehow. If it is known, there would be no problem.

Page 14: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Remember the example:Given : i=1 A, N=100, lc=40 cm, A= 100 cm2 r =5000

Calculate : F, H, B, , and

100. iNF

2504.0

100

cl

FH

57.12505000104

.7

HB

0157.001.057.1. AB

385.636601.05000104

4.07

A

lc

41057.11

Page 15: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Now consider this example:Given : i=1 A, N=100, lc=40 cm, A= 100 cm2 given the above B-H curve

Calculate : F, H, B, , and

100. iNF

2504.0

100

cl

FH

From the magnetizing curve: 2.1B

012.001.02.1. AB

0048.0250

2.1

H

B

33.833301.00048.0

4.0

A

lc

4102.11

Page 16: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Hysteresis When we increased the current we observed, saturation.What would happen if I decrease the current after saturation?

The flux for a given H is higher when decreasing

Page 17: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Can we explain the hysteresis phenomena?

All materials consist of small magnetic domains.When they are in a magnetic field the domains are intended to be in line with the field.

Page 18: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

The domainsbefore applying magnetic field

The domainsafter applying magnetic field

When the magnetic field is removed, not all domains are randomized again

Page 19: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:
Page 20: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Hysteresis loss

Hysteresis is not a serious problem when we have DC excitation (the examples considered so far). It causes some loss when we have AC excitation, called hysteresis loss.If we have AC excitation, e.g. the current i is sinusoid, the hysteresis happens at each cycle. The hysteresis loss is proportional to the frequency and also depends on the area of the hysteresis loop.

Page 21: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Other losses

- Copper loss:2.IRPcu

- Eddy Current loss:

ehc PPP - Core losses:

Page 22: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

Eddy Current

Eddy current:As we saw, a flux induces a voltage on a coil.Q: Why not inducing a voltage on the core itself?A: It actually does.The result is eddy current. That is why the transformers core are laminated.

Page 23: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits:

222 .... BtfVKP ee

Page 24: Summary of the last lecture. Magnetic circuits Compare this formula with Ohm’s law in electric circuits: