subcutaneous botulinum toxin for chronic post-thoracotomy pain
TRANSCRIPT
CLINICAL REPORT
Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin
for Chronic Post-Thoracotomy
Pain
Gustavo Fabregat, MD; Juan M. Asensio-Samper, MD; Stefano Palmisani, MD;
Vicente L. Villanueva-Perez, MD; Jose De Andres, MD, PhD
Department of Multidisciplinary Pain Management, General University Hospital, Valencia,Spain
n Abstract: Objective: Botulinum toxin is a neurotoxin
that has been widely used in chronic pain for the treatment
of multiple conditions with a component of localized
muscle spasm. Recent studies suggest that botulinum toxin
is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes
such as post-herpetic neuralgia.
Case Report: We report the case of a 67-year-old man
who underwent atypical segmentectomy of a right lower
lobe lung nodule. The patient was referred to our pain
management department with a of 2-year history persistent
pain along the thoracotomy scar having a predominantly
neuropathic component, refractory to standard treatments.
He was successfully treated with subcutaneous botulinum
toxin type A.
Discussion: On the basics of our own experience and on
the analysis of the reports published in the literature,
fractioned subcutaneous injections of botulinum toxin may
be useful for the treatment of various chronic localized pain
conditions including chronic post-thoracotomy pain. n
Key Words: botulinum toxin, neuropathic pain, subcuta-
neous, chronic post-thoracotomy pain
Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) is a common
entity in clinical practice. It is defined as pain that
recurs or persists along a thoracotomy incision for at
least 2 months following surgery.1 The incidence of
chronic post-thoracotomy pain ranges between 26%
and 67%2 and can persist in 38% of the cases 3 years
after surgery.3
The etiology of chronic post-thoracotomy pain
remains unclear; however, it is believed that both noci-
ceptive and neuropathic components may play a role.
Indeed, neuropathic components may be present in
nearly 50% of the patients who develop chronic post-
thoracotomy pain.3 Multiple therapies have been
attempted for conditions involving neuropathic pain.
The most frequently used drugs include tricyclic
antidepressants, ligands of the a2d subunit of voltage-
dependent calcium channels, lidocaine patches and
opioids.4 However, in spite of the wide range of thera-
peutic options, neuropathic pain remains poorly con-
trolled in many patients.
Botulinum toxin is a neurotoxin that has been
widely used in chronic pain for the treatment of multi-
ple conditions with a component of localized muscle
spasm, such as focal dystonia, cramps or isolated
spasms and chronic myofascial pain syndromes.5
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Gustavo Fabregat,MD, Department of Multidisciplinary Pain Management, General Univer-sity Hospital, Avda. Tres Cruces s/n, 46014, Valencia, Spain. E-mail:[email protected].
Submitted: June 21, 2011; Revision accepted: May 14, 2012DOI. 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00569.x
� 2012 The Authors
Pain Practice � 2012 World Institute of Pain, 1530-7085/12/$15.00
Pain Practice, Volume ••, Issue •, 2012 ••–••
Recent studies suggest that botulinum toxin is effective
in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndromes such
as post-herpetic neuralgia,6 even if its mechanisms of
action are not fully understood.
We present the case of a 67-year-old patient treated
with subcutaneous botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A)
for chronic post-thoracotomy pain with a predomi-
nantly neuropathic component.
CASE REPORT
We report the case of a 67-year-old man with a history
of smoking 40 cigarettes per day, with emphysematous
COPD treated with beta-2 agonists, inhaled steroids
and tiotropium. The patient underwent atypical seg-
mentectomy of a right lower lobe nodule that was path-
ologically confirmed to be a squamous cell carcinoma.
The patient was referred to our Pain Management
Department with a 2-year history of persistent pain along
the thoracotomy scar. The pain was described by the
patient as oppressive, stabbing, and intermittent, with
electric shock sensations and radiation into the breast.
The pain involved 2 intercostal spaces at the level of the
thoracotomy and the intercostal space below (intercostal
spaces 6 and 7). The reported severity of his pain was 8
on the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 to 10). Upon physi-
cal examination, the patient exhibited tenderness of the
dermatomes involved with mechanical dynamic allo-
dynia and pin-prick hyperalgesia. The remainder of the
neurological examination was within normal limits.
With these findings, the patient was diagnosed with
neuropathic pain secondary to thoracic surgery.7
The patient had been treated with multiple anti-
inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and metamizole
sodium. At the time of his first visit to our Pain Manage-
ment Department, he was being treated with gabapentin
2400 mg/day and sustained-release oral morphine
(60 mg/day), with little effectiveness. Duloxetine treat-
ment was initiated at 60 mg/day and intercostal nerve
blocks were performed at the affected levels, with almost
no improvement. Topical capsaicin was added, and the
scar was injected with neurolytic solution, resulting in
partial improvement (VAS 6). Given the persistence of
his symptoms and the lack of results, we decided to per-
form subcutaneous infiltration of the painful area with
BTX-A (Botox�; Allergan, Irvine, CA, U.S.A.).
For these purposes, the affected area was thor-
oughly examined and the areas of hyperalgesia and
allodynia were defined using a sharp stick and a swab
brush, respectively (Figure 1).
After marking these areas, a grid covering the
affected zone was drawn with divisions of approxi-
mately 1 square centimeter. We then deposited 2.5 IU
of BTX-A in the center of the squares that most closely
corresponded to the painful area. A maximum of 40
squares were infiltrated with a total dose of toxin
amounting to 100 IU.
Five days after the treatment, the improvement in
pain was about 50% as measured on the VAS. The
patient reported having experienced some restlessness
in the afternoon after the infiltration, in addition to
discomfort associated with the puncture.
At 15 days after infiltration, the improvement
reported by the patient was approximately 80% (VAS
1). This improvement persisted at 12 weeks after
infiltration.
DISCUSSION
The precise mechanism by which BTX-A relieves neu-
ropathic pain remains unclear, while the number of
papers reporting a significant improvement in pain is
increasing. Encouraging improvements have been
reported in a variety of situations that exhibit a neuro-
pathic pain component such as post-herpetic neural-
gia,6,8–10 central pain syndrome,11 chronic postsurgical
pain (hernia repair, hysterectomy or carpal tunnel syn-
drome),12 post-traumatic neuralgia,12 trigeminal neu-
ralgia, and chronic facial pain.13,14 Other situations in
which BTX was administered successfully include
diabetic neuropathy,15,16 complex regional pain syn-
drome17 and occipital neuralgia.18
Figure 1. Detail of the areas of hyperalgesia (white arrow) andallodynia (black arrow).
2 • FABREGAT ET AL.
In addition to amputation of a limb, thoracotomy is
considered by some authors to be the procedure entail-
ing the highest risk of severe chronic postoperative
pain.19 Little is known about the etiology of chronic
post-thoracotomy pain. The proposed causes include
intra-operative intercostal nerve injury causing neuro-
pathic pain;20 however, chronic postoperative pain
seems to encompass both nociceptive and neuropathic
components.21
We found only one case of chronic post-thoracotomy
pain treated with subcutaneous BTX-A in the literature.
In this report, a decrease of 50% in the VAS score was
obtained after the treatment.12 In our patient, the
improvement was approximately 80%, from an initial
VAS score of 8 to a VAS score of 1 at 4 weeks; the
improvement persisted at 12-week follow-up.
It is certainly known that BTX-A proteolytically
degrades the SNAP-25 protein, a type of SNARE pro-
tein. The SNAP-25 protein is required for vesicle fusion
that releases neurotransmitters from the axon endings
(in particular, acetylcholine). BTX selectively blocks
cholinergic transmission at the neuromuscular junction
(proteolytic activity directed specifically on SNARE
proteins, essential for vesicle fusion). This mechanism
of action makes BTX useful in clinical practice.
It seems, nonetheless, that the effect of BTX is not
limited to the local activity. Some studies have shown
that active BTX-A spreads to neighboring, non-
injected muscles. Indeed, Yaraskavitch et al. injected
BTX-A intramuscularly in an experimental study in
cats. Four weeks after BTX-A injection in the target
muscle, force production was decreased in non-target
neighboring muscles. The decreases in forces were not
associated with the differences in the muscle masses
for target and neighboring agonist muscles (ie this is
not the result of functional disuse).22
It has also been observed that BTX-A may inhibit
peripheral sensitization of nociceptive fibers as well as
neurogenic inflammation by inhibiting the release of
local nociceptive neuropeptides/agents via vesicle-
dependent exocytosis (calcitonin-GRP, substance P,
bradykinin, glutamate) or by other mechanisms
(TRPV1, ATP receptor P2X3).23–26
It is widely assumed that BTX-A remains at the syn-
aptic terminal and its effects are confined to the injec-
tion sites. However, Antonucci et al.27 demonstrated,
in a series of experiments in rats, that catalytically
active BTX is retrogradely transported by central neu-
rons and motoneurons and is then transcytosed to
afferent synapses, in which it cleaves SNAP-25. Detec-
tion of cleaved SNAP 25 is the most sensitive test to
monitor the presence of BTX-A in vivo because a sin-
gle toxin molecule can proteolyze a large number of
SNAP 25 target molecules. These authors found SNAP
25 cleavage in distant areas such as the contralateral
hemisphere when they administered BTX-A in the hip-
pocampus of rats. Similarly, administration of BTX-A
in the optic tectum led to emergence of BTX-A trun-
cated SNAP-25 in the retina, thereby demonstrating
that the substance is transported unchanged to the
neuron’s soma and is subsequently released in second-
order neurons. This spread was not only seen in the
central nervous system. When using BTX-A in rat
whisker muscles, cleaved SNAP 25 also appeared in
the facial nucleus. These experiments demonstrate axo-
nal migration and neuronal transcytosis of BTX-A.
This retrograde spread was blocked by colchicine,
pointing to an involvement of microtubule-dependent
axonal transport.
Some studies in humans point to CNS changes in
patients treated with intramuscular BTX-A.28 These
changes are attributed to denervation or alterations of
sensory inputs after toxin treatment. Perhaps the retro-
grade neuronal transport of unaltered toxin could
explain distant effects of botulinum toxin. However,
this would warrant further research.
One of the drawbacks of case reports is to rule out
the placebo effect. Although the placebo effect because
of needle insertion could explain the improvement
experienced by our patient, having received previous
unsuccessful interventional therapies as well as the
coincidence in time with the activity of the toxin
makes this possibility less likely.
Based on the analysis of the reports published in the
literature, it would appear that fractioned subcutane-
ous injections of botulinum toxin may be useful for
the treatment of various chronic localized pain condi-
tions with minimal side effects, including CPTP syn-
drome. The mechanism by which this new route of
administration is effective remains unknown and may
constitute the focus of futures studies. Multicenter tri-
als are needed to establish indications, dosages, and
routes of administration, whereas longer follow-up
periods are warranted to determine the safety of such
treatments.
REFERENCES
1. Strebel BM, Ross S. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain
syndrome. CMAJ. 2007;9:1027.
Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin for CPTP • 3
2. Pluijms WA, Steegers MAH, Verhagen AFTM, et al.
Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a retrospective study. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:804–808.
3. Dajczman E, Gordon A, Kreisman H, Wolkove N.
Long-term postthoracotomy pain. Chest. 1991;99:270–274.
4. Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Backonja M, et al.
Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-
based recommendations. Pain. 2007;132:237–251.
5. Jost WH. Other indications of botulinum toxin ther-
apy. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13(suppl 1):65–69.
6. Ruiz Huete C, Bermejo PE. Botulinum toxin type A
in the treatment of neuropathic pain in a case of postherpe-
tic neuralgia. Neurologia. 2008;23:259–262.
7. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, et al. Neuro-
pathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical
and research purposes. Neurology. 2008;70:1630–1635.
8. Liu HT, Tsai SK, Kao MC, Hu JS. Botulinum toxin A
relieved neuropathic pain in a case of post-herpetic neuralgia.
Pain Med. 2006;7:89–91.
9. Sotiriu E, Apalla Z, Panagiotidou D, Ioannidis D.
Severe post-herpetic neuralgia succesfully treated with botu-
linum toxin A: three case reports. Acta Derm Venereol.
2009;889:214–215.
10. Xiao L, Mackey S, Hui H, et al. Subcutaneous injec-
tion of botulinum toxin A is beneficial in postherpetic neural-
gia. Pain Med. 2010;11:1827–1833.
11. Jabbari B, Maher N, Difazio MP. Botulinum toxin A
improved burning pain and allodynia in two patients with
spinal cord pathology. Pain Med. 2003;4:206–210.
12. Ranoux D, Attal N, Morain F, Bouhassira D. Botu-
linum toxin type A induces direct analgesic effects in chronic
neuropathic pain. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:274–283.
13. Borodic GE, Acquadro MA. The use of botulinum
toxin for the treatment of chronic facial pain. J Pain. 2002;3:
21–27.
14. Piovesan EJ, Teive HG, Kowacs PA, Della Coletta
MV, Werneck LC, Silberstein SD. An open study of botu-
linum-A toxin treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology.
2005;65:1306–1308.
15. Yuan RY, Sheu JJ, Yu JM, et al. Botulinum toxin for
diabetic neuropathic pain: a randomized double-blind cross-
over trial. Neurology. 2009;72:1473–1478.
16. Apfel SC. Botulinum toxin for neuropathic pain?.
Neurology. 2009;72:1456–1457.
17. Carroll I, Clark JD, Mackey S. Sympathetic block
with botulinum toxin to treat complex regional pain syn-
drome. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:348–351.
18. Kapural L, Stillman M, Kapural M, et al. Botulinum
toxin occipital nerve block for the treatment of severe occipi-
tal neuralgia: a case series. Pain practice. 2007;7:337–340.
19. Wildgaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post-thora-
cotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and
strategies for prevention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:
170–180.
20. Maguire MF, Latter JA, Mahajan R, Beggs FD, Duffy
JP. A study exploring the role of intercostal nerve damage in
chronic pain alter thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.
2006;29:873–879.
21. Steegers MA, Snik DM, Verhagen AF, Van der Drift
MA, Wilder-Smith OH. Only half of the chronic pain after
thoracic surgery shows a neuropathic component. J Pain.
2008;9:955–961.
22. Yaraskavitch M, Leonard T, Herzog W. Botox pro-
duces functional weakness in non-injected muscles adjacent
to the target muscle. J Biomech. 2008;41:897–902.
23. Cui M, Khanijou S, Rubino J, Aoki KR. Subcutane-
ous administration of botulinum toxin A reduces formalin-
induced pain. Pain. 2004;2:125–133.
24. Smith CP, Vemulakonda VM, Kiss S, Boone TB,
Somogyi GT. Enhanced ATP release from rat bladder urothe-
lium during chronic bladder inflammation�ffect of botu-
linum toxin A. Neurochem Int. 2005;47:291–297.
25. Gazerani P, Pedersen NS, Staahl C, et al. Subcutane-
ous botulinum toxin type A reduces capsaicin-induced tri-
geminal pain and vasomotor reactions in human skin. Pain.
2009;141:60–69.
26. Tugnoli V, Capone JG, Eleopra R, et al. Botulinum
toxin type A reduces capsaicin-evoked pain and neurogenic
vasodilation in human skin. Pain. 2007;130:76–83.
27. Antonucci F, Rossi C, Gianfranceschi L, Rossetto O,
Caleo M. Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neu-
rotoxin A. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3689–3696.
28. Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Wilson SA, et al. The
corticomotor representation of upper limb muscles in writer’s
cramp and changes following botulinum toxin injection.
Brain. 1998;5(Pt 5):977–988.
4 • FABREGAT ET AL.