su ferc open solicitation process - cloud object storage | store & retrieve data ... · ·...
TRANSCRIPT
SU FERC Open Solicitation
Process
Informational WebinarApril 22, 2016
11 am – 1 pm CDT
Power Through Ideas
SU FERC, LLC
Disclaimer
Energy Strategies 2
The sole purpose of this Informational Webinar is to assist prospective Users in deciding whether to proceed with
submitting a proposal to acquire transmission capacity from SU FERC, L.L.C. (“SU FERC”) on the Southline
Transmission Project (the “Transaction”) in SU FERC’s open solicitation process.
This Informational Webinar may not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any purpose other than evaluating a
potential Transaction.
SU FERC is acting solely as principal and not as advisor or fiduciary, and nothing contained in this Informational
Webinar has been endorsed by Energy Strategies, LLC (“Energy Strategies”). Users should not construe the contents
of this Informational Webinar as legal, tax, investment or other advice. Each User is expected to conduct its own
evaluation as it relates to a potential Transaction.
Neither SU FERC nor Energy Strategies guarantees the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth in this
Informational Webinar, and nothing shall imply that the information contained in this Informational Webinar is correct as
of any time subsequent to the date the Southline Transmission Project open solicitation process was initiated. SU
FERC and Energy Strategies reserve the right to modify or update the information contained in this Informational
Webinar, but are under no obligation to do so.
Certain assumptions about transmission topography, costs, pricing, and related facts were made in the development
and implementation of the Market Feasibility Tool discussed in this Informational Webinar. These assumptions may or
may not reflect the User’s own experience, costs and benefits. The User should perform its own independent review of
any potential Transaction’s costs and benefits.
Open Solicitation Process Summary
• Open Solicitation allows parties to indicate
interest in obtaining transmission capacity rights
in the Southline Transmission Project
• Goal is to identify potential transmission
customers with whom SU FERC will engage in
bilateral negotiations
• Process is designed to be fair, transparent, and
not unduly discriminatory or preferential
Energy Strategies3
Today’s Webinar Guidelines
• Length: 2 hours
• Webinar will be recorded and posted to website
• Participant lines will be muted for duration of webinar
• Participation is anonymous to other users
• Written questions may be submitted via webinar or to
[email protected] during the session
– Responses to questions may be provided during Q&A session at the
end of the webinar
– Questions not addressed live on the webinar will be compiled into FAQ
document and posted to www.southline-os.com. Posting of the FAQ
document will be noticed to registered participants via email and
announcement on the website.
Energy Strategies 4
Agenda1. Southline Transmission Project Overview
2. Project Value Proposition
3. Open Solicitation Process
4. Question and Answer Session
Energy Strategies 5
Introductions• SU FERC, LLC
– Affiliate of Sharyland Utilities, L.P., a Texas-based electric utility headquartered
in Dallas, Texas
– Privately owned by Hunter L. Hunt and other members of the family of Ray L.
Hunt
– Granted negotiated rate authority by FERC and will provide service under a
FERC-approved Open Access Transmission Tariff for Project capacity rights
obtained from Southline Transmission, LLC
• Southline Transmission, LLC
– Project sponsor and subsidiary of Hunt Power, who develops and invests in
entrepreneurial electric transmission opportunities
– Southline Transmission, LLC is a passive investment entity that will hold project
assets and rights, and will lease them to SU FERC, L.L.C.
– Black Forest Partners, LP originated the Project and serves as Project Manager
for Southline Transmission, LLC
• Energy Strategies, LLC
– Independent energy consulting firm founded in 1986, based out of Salt Lake
City, Utah, supporting SU FERC, LLC as solicitation manager
Energy Strategies 6
Southline Transmission is a subsidiary of Hunt Consolidated –
A Proven Energy Developer
• Founded in 1934, the Hunt Oil Company and Hunt Consolidated (a diversified holding
company managed by the Ray L. Hunt family) are actively engaged in energy and
infrastructure businesses throughout the world
• Hunt has a long history of entrepreneurial activity and a successful track record in
developing and constructing large complex projects, such as the Texas CREZ project
• Hunt has successfully partnered with large multinationals, international partners, and
governments, and has a presence in 14 countries around the world
Energy Strategies 7
SU FERC, L.L.C. is an affiliate of Sharyland Utilities, L.P. a Texas-
based electric utility
Energy Strategies 8
Transmission
► ~665 miles of transmission lines
► Transmission Operations Center
► Railroad DC Tie with Mexico
(300 MW)
Distribution
► ~12,300 miles of distribution lines
► ~53,000 electric delivery points
• Sharyland Utilities operates over $1 billion in assets and currently serves
approximately 53,000 customers in 29 counties throughout Texas.
Energy Strategies 9
Agenda1. Southline Transmission Project Overview
2. Project Value Proposition
3. Open Solicitation Process
4. Question and Answer Session
Project Overview
• Two Segments, approximately
360 Miles
– New Build — 345kV double-circuit
Afton-Apache, 240 Miles
– Upgrade — 230kV double-circuit
Apache-Saguaro/Tortolita, 120 Miles
• Option for Improved Regional
Coordination
– Bi-directional capability
– Multiple interconnections to existing
& planned system
Energy Strategies 10
• Minimize Environmental Impacts
– Upgrade existing lines
– Follow existing corridors
– Minimize impacts to environmental
and cultural resources
• Meet Multiple Needs
– Improve Reliability
– Relieve Congestion
– Support Growth
– Facilitate Access to Renewable
Resources
Key Project Milestones
Energy Strategies 12
2015
• Received FERC authorization to commence open solicitation
• Final Federal Environmental Impact Statement published
• Granted WECC Phase 3 Path Rating
2016-17
• Federal Records of Decision issued
• Conduct open solicitation, execute transmission service agreements
• Complete state processes & land rights
• First Construction Phase initiated
2018
• First Construction Phase complete
• Initial Operations begin
2019-20
• Construction complete
• Complete scope in service
Permitting Summary
• Bureau of Land Management and
Western, jointly led the NEPA
environmental review process
• Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Project
on November 6, 2015
• BLM and Western issued their
respective Records of Decision
on the environmental process
in April, 2016
Agencies Participating in EISU.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Bureau of Reclamation
Department of Defense
Clearinghouse
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
Fort Huachuca Army Base
National Park Service
U.S. Forest Service (Coronado
National Forest)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Arizona Game and Fish
Department
Arizona State Land Department
New Mexico Department of Game
and Fish
New Mexico State Land Office
Cochise County, Arizona
Greenlee County, Arizona
Graham County, Arizona
City of Sierra Vista, Arizona
13Energy Strategies
• The Project expects to complete state permitting by late 2016. The Project will
then initiate acquisition of remaining land rights.
FEIS Mileage Route Summary
15
• More than 85% of FEIS Agency Preferred Route Parallels or Upgrades
Existing Corridor
• Only 8 miles (2%) of FEIS Route is a New Corridor on Private Lands
Source: Southline FEIS
Mileage By Segment
New Build Segment BLM State Private Other Total
Parallel Existing 68 66 63 0.0 196
New Corridor 32 10 7.3 0.0 49
Total 99.7 76 70 0.0 246
Upgrade Segment BLM State Private Other Total
Upgrade Existing 0.6 52.8 62 4.2 119
New Corridor 0 0.6 1 0 2
Total 0.6 53.4 63 4.2 121
Total project BLM State Private Other Total
Upgrade/Parallel Existing 68 119 124 4 315
New Corridor 32 11 8 0 51
Total 100 129 133 4 367
Energy Strategies
Technical Summary
• Project team has actively participated with regional utilities in various transmission
planning forums since 2009
• The Project completed Phase 1 of the WECC Path Rating Process in March 2012,
completed Phase 2B in January 2013, and entered Phase 3 in March 2015
WECC Phase 3 Accepted Path Ratings
East-to-West: 1,037 MW Afton to Apache
East-to-West: 1,000 MW Apache to Saguaro/Tortolita
West-to-East: 430 MW Saguaro/Tortolita to Apache*
West-to-East: 971 MW Apache to Afton
*715 MW if Tucson-Oracle re-conductered
16Energy Strategies
Project Approach
Multi-purpose project enhances reliability and accesses both rich
renewables resources and cost-effective existing generation. Project
team has worked to maximize benefits with minimizing environmental
and economic costs
Energy Strategies 17
Maximize Benefits Minimize Costs
• Flexibility and “fit” into regional
system meet needs of broad
customer base
• Multi-purpose project accesses
renewables, enhances reliability,
and accesses cost-effective power
• Helps to facilitate full utilization of
existing transmission and
generation assets in Southwest
• Project right-sized for foreseeable
regional and market needs
• Use of existing transmission
infrastructure lowers new build
mileage which lowers economic
costs and environmental impacts
• Avoids “all or nothing” proposition
Energy Strategies 18
Agenda1. Southline Transmission Project Overview
2. Project Value Proposition
3. Open Solicitation Process
4. Question and Answer Session
Project Drivers
• The Project has the potential to provide
value to parties through a number of
drivers, including:
– Reliability Benefits
– Market Access
– Renewable Procurement
– Integration of Renewable Generation
Energy Strategies 19
Reliability Benefits• Project’s Upgrade Segment would replace decades-old wood pole
H-frame systems whose deterioration poses reliability and
maintenance concerns
Energy Strategies 20
• The New Build Segment would
increase the limited transmission
connections between the southern
New Mexico/El Paso area and the
rest of the western United States
transmission grid.
• Hardens system in the event of
wildfires, storms, or other events
• Provides operations and
maintenance flexibility
• Increases ability to reliably meet
future load growth
Upgraded 230 kV tower along existing WAPA 115
kV line near Tucson
Market Access
• The Project will expand opportunities for local and regional utilities
to import cost-effective power from regional markets
• Utilities may be able to take advantage of low-cost electricity
“spilling” over to these market hubs as a result of California’s build-
out of solar resources and the accompanying over-generation
Energy Strategies 21
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
$/M
Wh
On-Peak Monthly Forward Power IndexSource: OTC Global Holdings via SNL
Mead Palo Verde
Renewable Procurement
• The project will provide increased transmission capacity
to both high quality wind and solar resources
Energy Strategies 22
Wind Resources, Southline and Potential Existing PathsWind & Solar Resources and Southline Transmission Project
Source: NREL WREZ and Southline LLC
Source: Southline LLC, NREL Wind Data
Integration of Renewable Generation• The project will help planned and existing gas generation in the
Southwest integrate more renewable resources
• NERC 2015 Long-Term Reliability Assessment: The Southwest
Reserve Sharing Group (SRSG) within WECC has an approximately
42% reserve margin for the 2016 summer peak season, versus the
NERC reference level of 16%
Energy Strategies 23
Source: Most recently approved IRPs
Planned Gas-fired Generation Additions (2016-2026)
Public Service Company of New Mexico 394 MW
El Paso Electric 825 MW
Tucson Electric Power 836 MW
Arizona Public Service 3,030 MW
Regional utilities are
planning to build at least
5,085 MW of new natural
gas-fired resources in the
next 10-years
Opportunities for Potential Customers
Customer TypeCapacity Direction
East-to-West West-to-East
Local (Southwest) Utilities
Enhanced reliability Access high quality renewable
resources Better utilize existing assets Facilitate regional coordination and
participation in markets
Enhanced reliability Access energy markets Facilitate regional coordination and
participation in regional markets
Generation Developers and Owners Deliver world class, low cost
renewables to high-value markets Access transmission constrained
customers
California Utilities
Access high quality and geographically diverse renewable resources
Renewable integration opportunities
Export over-generation and reduce renewable energy curtailment
Facilitate regional coordination and participation in regional markets
Power Marketers Provide packaged products (e.g.,
firmed/shaped) to markets Sell transmission service for future
California energy exports
Energy Strategies 24
All customer “types” are invited to participate in the Southline Open Solicitation. These categories of
potential customers are called out to demonstrate the value the project can provide.
Value Proposition:
Local (Southwest) Utilities• The Project will help local utilities get the most out of their existing
systems – mitigating the impacts of future reliability risks, improving
access to regional markets, and providing a means to cost
effectively achieve state and federal clean energy goals
Energy Strategies 25
UPGRADESEGMENTREPLACESAGINGINFRASTRUCTURE
NEARMAJORLOADCENTERS,STRENGTHENINGSYSTEM
NEWBUILDSEGMENTBI-DIRECTIONALUSAGEANDMULTIPLEONANDOFFRAMPSPROVIDESBENEFITSTHROUGHOUT
THEPROJECTCORRIDOR.PROJECTSIZECONSISTENTWITHEXISTINGSYSTEMAND
PLANNEDUPGRADES
Benefits Identified in Planning Studies
Value Proposition:
Local (Southwest) Utilities (cont.)
Energy Strategies 26
Mead
Palo
Verde
California’s over-generation could suppress
spot and forward power at key markets
Southline transmission capacity can serve
as a cost-effective means for eastern utilities
to access this market
West-to-east transmission rights on the
Project will allow local and regional
utilities to purchase cost-effective
energy, offsetting or deferring the need to
construct resources in their footprint to
meet growing loads
Value Proposition:
Generation Developers and Owners• The Project has several key competitive advantages that generation developers
should consider:
– Project provides access to world-class wind and solar resources
– The Project gives resource developers access to potential customers with whom they can seek PPAs
– Project is highly versatile and efficient
Energy Strategies 27
Source: NREL and NREL Wind Toolkit
Value Proposition: California Utilities
Energy Strategies 28
• Renewable resources from the Southwest may provide low procurement and
integration cost solutions to meet SB 350 requirements
• Initial SB 350 studies model solar and wind resources imported in CA, with
wind busbar costs at $21/MWh and capacity factors of 46%
Source: E3 and CAISO SB-350 Study
Value Proposition: California Utilities (cont.)
• Renewable resources sourced from New Mexico and southern Arizona have
decreased coincidence with the existing and planned renewable generation
already making up the bulk of California’s RPS portfolio
Energy Strategies 29
California Overgeneration Demonstration
Source: E3, “Western Interconnection Flexibility Assessment”
A diverse resource portfolio, relying on
renewable generation from areas (such as New Mexico)
that generate at times other than the mid-day peak, can help avoid or
mitigate the threat of over-generation.
Market Feasibility Tool – Overview & Key
Assumptions
• The tool was created to help demonstrate flexibility and utility of the line,
and to provide a quick cost analysis for a variety of “use” configurations
– Available on confidential portion of website; informational
Energy Strategies 30
Incorporates transmission rate
data from local or regional
Transmission Service Provider’s
(TSP’s) Open-Access Transmission
Tariffs (OATTs). Differentiates
between “wheel only” and “wheel
plus ancillary services”
Does not specifically account for
Available Transfer Capability
(ATC) for contract paths from the
generator to the Project and from
the Project to the identified market
hubs
Assumes that transmission
capacity is procured in an amount
equal to the total capacity of the
generation
Key Assumptions
Tool does not consider:
• Possibility that procured capacity may be sold as non-firm transmission when it is not being used by the
generator;
• Possibility that an entity may already own transmission rights on a required 3rd party system wheel
Market Feasibility Tool – Screen Shots
31Energy Strategies
Input Assumptions: User defines generation location and cost
attributes, selects transmission contract path to deliver to market
Review Results: Tool calculates costs ($/MWh) to deliver
generation to market hub; includes generation cost, third-party
wheels, and project service charges
User inputs project service charge(s) for capacity on
SU FERC portion of Southline Project
Map shows project and key transmission
Cost breakdown
• Case Study A: New Mexico Wind delivered to Palo
Verde
• Case Study B: Southwest solar delivered to regional
Utility
• Screen shots of the Market Feasibility Tool case studies
are available in the Appendix
• Transmission Wheel Rate Summary also included in
Appendix
Market Feasibility Tool – Live
Demonstration
Energy Strategies32
Energy Strategies 33
Agenda1. Southline Transmission Project Overview
2. Project Value Proposition
3. Open Solicitation Process
4. Question and Answer Session
Open Solicitation Process Overview
• The Open Solicitation allows parties to express interest in obtaining
transmission capacity rights in the Project
• The goal of the process is to identify potential transmission
customers with whom SU FERC will engage in bilateral
negotiations
Energy Strategies 34
Segment East-to-West (MW) West-to-East (MW)
Afton to Apache 882 825
Apache to Saguaro/Tortolita 748 186
SU FERC’s Capacity Rights on Southline Transmission Project
Capacity rights are available in both directions, and
parties are not required to request transmission
capacity across entire length of line
Open Solicitation Process Schedule
March 31, 2016 Open Solicitation commences
April 22, 2016 Informational Webinar (11:00 am - 1:00 pm CDT)
June 30, 2016Open Solicitation window closes and Expression of Interest Forms are due
July 11, 2016 Parties identified for Bilateral Negotiations
July 12, 2016Begin Precedent Agreement discussions then initiate Transmission Service Agreement negotiations.
Energy Strategies35
All requests for capacity on the Project must be
submitted through the Open Solicitation window and
the Expression of Interest Form provided on the
solicitation website
Screening and Ranking Criteria
• Parties that are interested in obtaining capacity rights must register
and complete an Expression of Interest Form
– Executing a Confidentiality Agreement is not required
• Energy Strategies will review and screen all parties that submit an
Expression of Interest
• Customers that pass the initial screening are then ranked for the
purposes of phasing negotiations
• Screening criteria:
1. First mover status;
2. Creditworthiness;
3. Firm transmission service request for at least 10 years; and
4. Transmission service request for at least 50 MW of capacity (on any
segment, in either direction).
Energy Strategies36
Screening and Ranking Criteria (cont.)
• Interested parties that satisfy the screening criteria move into a pool
of qualified customers that will be ranked according to the following
criteria:
1. Price terms contained in the customer’s offer;
2. Level of creditworthiness (or financial strength);
3. Early commitment in the Project’s development cycle (i.e., first mover
status);
4. Project risk sharing through phased deposits or financial commitments
during the Project’s development cycle;
5. Ability of customer to assist with Project development needs, including
necessary siting approvals and government authorizations;
6. Longer term of service;
7. Larger capacity reservation; and
8. Ability to access the Project to deliver or receive power (e.g., proximity
of generation resource to the line; transmission queue position on
adjacent systems).Energy Strategies
37
Website and Communications
• The Open Solicitation website is the primary means of
communication during the process
– www.southline-os.com
• Changes or updates to the process or project will be posted to the
website, and online FAQ documents are updated to respond to
submitted questions
– Notifications will go out to those that have registered with website
• Website registration is required for:
– Expression of Interest Form
– “Ask a Question” page
– “Request a Meeting” page
– Accessing confidential information (after execution of mutual NDA)
Energy Strategies38
Website Overview
• Connect – Registered parties can submit questions to the solicitation manager (Energy
Strategies) and SU FERC. They can also request a meeting to discuss the Project. The
Expression of Interest Form is also submitted here. Parties need not execute Confidentiality
Agreements to express interest in obtaining capacity in the Project, although registration is
required.
• News and Announcements – New materials, updates, or other developments during the Open
Solicitation process will be available here. Parties that have registered will be notified via email
when new materials are posted.
• Calendar – List of the critical dates related to Open Solicitation process.
• Documents – Series of documents that describe the Open Solicitation process and the Project.
Includes public-facing FAQs. Also includes this Information Memo, which should be reviewed by
all interested parties that plan to participate in the process.
• Registration – Allows interested parties to ask questions, submit the Expression of Interest Form,
participate in the Informational Webinar, request a meeting, and receive email announcements
related to the Open Solicitation and the Project. Also facilitates the execution of a Confidentiality
Agreement, which would give the interested party access to the confidential portion of the website.
• Confidential – Contains documents that are not publicly available. This password protected
portion of website is only accessible if interested parties register and execute the Confidentiality
Agreement.
Energy Strategies 39
www.southline-os.com
Expression of Interest Form
• Expression of Interest Form is used to identify interested parties that would
like to engage in bilateral negotiations with SU FERC for transmission rights
on the Southline Transmission Project– Non-binding indication of interest
– Must be submitted through Open Solicitation website (www.southline-os.com) on the
“Connect” tab, or through email to [email protected]
– Interested parties must register through website before submitting form
– The form must be submitted by June 30, 2016
• Form will be collected and reviewed by Energy Strategies, and evaluated
against screening and ranking criteria.
• Form consists of five sections, all of which must be completed to constitute
a valid submission:– Part A: Contact Information
– Part B: Credit and Financial Information
– Part C: Transmission Request
– Part D: Bidder Value Proposition
– Part E: Certifications
Energy Strategies40
Additional Information and Contacts
Open Solicitation Website: www.southline-os.com
Project Website: www.southlinetransmissionproject.com
Energy Strategies43
Open Solicitation Contact: Keegan Moyer, [email protected], 801-355-4365
Energy Strategies 44
Agenda1. Southline Transmission Project Overview
2. Project Value Proposition
3. Open Solicitation Process
4. Question and Answer Session
Questions and Answers
Thank You for Attending the Informational Webinar
Further questions may be submitted via email to [email protected] or
through the “Ask a Question” form on www.southline-os.com.
Energy Strategies 45
SB-350 Resource Assumptions
• Link to slides used in April 14, 2016
stakeholder meeting:
– https://www.caiso.com/Documents/PortfolioDe
velopment-DataInputs.pdf
• Cost and capacity factor values used to
populate Market Feasibility Tool in case
studies
Energy Strategies49
WECC Transmission Capital Cost Tool
• Link to publically available tool:
– https://www.wecc.biz/Reliability/2014_TEPPC_Trans
CapCostCalculator.xlsx
• Used default IPP financing assumptions to
populate transmission service fee in case
studies
– Assumed $800 M project cost and 60/40 spit for New
Build and Upgrade Segments
– Varied subscription between 1000 MW and 1200 MW
Energy Strategies50
2015 Achievements
Energy Strategies 51
Final EIS IssuedOctober 2015
FERC Granted
Declaratory Order
September 2015
WECC Phase 3 Accepted Path Rating
March 2015
Opportunities for Generation
Developers: RFP & IRP OverviewUtility RFP Size & Type
Southern California
Edison Co. (SCE)
Size not specified
For RFP
Arizona Public
Service Co. (APS)
400 – 600 MW
All sources
San Diego Gas and
Electric (SDG&E)
140 MW
Preferred resources
NV Energy 135 MW
Renewable energy
NV Energy 400 – 700 MW
Open resources
Energy Strategies 52
Utility IRP Highlights
Arizona Public
Service Co.
(APS)
Preliminary IRP shows a
supply-demand gap of more
than 5,000 MW at peak in
2032.
Tucson Electric
Power (TEP)
Preliminary IRP shows a
supply-demand gap in 2032
of 541 MW.
UNS Electric,
Inc. (UNS)
Preliminary IRP shows a
supply-demand gap in 2030
of 120 MW.
LADWP 2015 IRP Preferred Case
shows more than 4,000 MW
of renewable energy being
added by 2035.
Market Feasibility Tool – Transmission Wheel Rate
Summary
Energy Strategies 53
Transmission Service Provider Service TypeCapacity Costs
($/MW-year)Losses (%)
Arizona Public Service Wheel & Ancillary Services $38,807 2.50%
Arizona Public Service Wheel $36,130 2.50%
El Paso Electric Wheel & Ancillary Services $30,531 4.23%
El Paso Electric Wheel (internal) $29,091 4.23%
El Paso Electric Wheel (PV-WW external) $4,903 3.90%
El Paso Electric Wheel (PV-JOJOBA-KYRENE external) $11,243 3.90%
Public Service Company of New Mexico Wheel & Ancillary Services $35,896 3.50%
Public Service Company of New Mexico Wheel $30,980 3.50%
Salt River Project Wheel & Ancillary Services $21,780 3.24%
Salt River Project Wheel $21,780 3.24%
Southwest Transmission Cooperative Wheel & Ancillary Services $51,436 2.97%
Southwest Transmission Cooperative Wheel $33,780 2.97%
Tucson Electric Power Wheel & Ancillary Services $37,315 3.30%
Tucson Electric Power Wheel $29,535 3.30%
WALC (Intertie Project) Wheel & Ancillary Services $23,351 3.00%
WALC (Intertie Project) Wheel $21,412 3.00%
WALC (Parker Davis Project) Wheel & Ancillary Services $20,111 3.00%
WALC (Parker Davis Project) Wheel $18,172 3.00%
[1] Non-loss energy cost ($/MWh) of $0.80 are not shown.
Every TSP has different wheeling rates and rate structures. The rates included in this table were
taken from each TSP’s posted tariff rates and do not reflect any discounts or individual path
pricing that might be available via the Open Access Same-Time Information System.