study of nutrient contents of common chilies in comparison with hybrid chili
TRANSCRIPT
“STUDY OF NUTRIENT CONTENTS OF COMMON CHILIES IN
COMPARISON ON WITH HYBRID CHILI”
INTRODUCTION
Cayenne or Capsicum derives its name from the Greek, 'to bite'.
The dried fruit is a powerful local stimulant with no narcotic effect, it is
most useful in atony of the intestines and stomach.
Capsicum is the most pronounced, natural and ideal stimulant
known in the entire materia medica. It cannot be equaled by any known
agent when a powerful and prolonged stimulant is needed, as in
congestive chills, heart failure, and other conditions calling for quick
action. The entire circulation is affected by this agent and there is no
reaction. Capsicum increases the power of all other agents, helps the
digestion when taken with meals, and arouses all the secreting organs.
Whenever a stimulant is indicated, Capsicum may be given with the
utmost safety. It is the only natural stimulant worth considering for
diarrhea, dysentery with bloody mucus, stools, and offensive breath.
1
The potent, hot fruit of cayenne has been used as medicine for
centuries. It was considered helpful by herbalists for various conditions
of the gastrointestinal tract, including stomach aches, cramping pains,
and gas. Cayenne was frequently used to treat diseases of the circulatory
system. It is still traditionally used in herbal medicine as a circulatory
tonic (a substance believed to improve circulation). Rubbed on the skin,
cayenne is a traditional, as well as modern, remedy for rheumatic pains
and arthritis due to what is termed a counterirritant effect. A
counterirritant is something that causes irritation to a tissue to which it is
applied, thus distracting from the original irritation (such as joint pain in
the case of arthritis).
2
Capsaicin
The compound that is the active ingredient in chili peppers, which
allows them to be so valuable culinarily and as weapons, is called
capsaicin. Capsaicin (8-methy-N-vanillyl-noneamide) is the primarily
capsaicinoid. Capsaicin is what produces the "burning" sensation felt
when a chili pepper is eaten.. Capsaicin, a colorless crystalline substance,
was first synthesized in 1930. Capsaicin has the chemical formula
C18H27NO3.
Capsaicinoids are natural substances produced by chili peppers. Of
the capsaicinoid fraction, capsaicin (48.6%) is quantitatively followed by
6,7-dihydrocapsaicin (36%), nordihydrocapsaicin (7.4%),
3
homodihydrocapsaicin (2%), and homocapsaicin (2%) . Capsaicinoids
and capsaicin are collectively found in amounts of 0.1% to 1%, with
quantities varying according to soil and climate. The most important
constituents of Capsicum are pungent phenol compounds (0.05 - 1.5 %)
Some other constituents include carotenoids (capsanthin, capsorubin,
carotene, lutein etc.). There is also a minute quantity of a liquid alkaloid,
a saponin capsicidin and a fixed oil. Capsicum also contains up to 0.2%
ascorbic acid. The vitamin and mineral content (per 100 gm) is calcium
(29 mg), phosphorus (78 mg), iron (1.2 mg), potassium (374 mg),
thiamine (0.22 mg), riboflavin (0.36 mg), and niacin (4.4 mg). Capsicum
is also rich in fats (9-17%) and protein (12-15%).
4
It is has high solubility in alcohol, but very low solubility in water.
It should be noted that since capsaicin is an oil, its lipophilic property
allows it to be solvable in fat. Capsaicin melts at 65 degrees Celsius, and
boils at 210-220 degrees Celsius (0.01 torr). This molecule is not
primarily found in the seed as mistakenly believed by many, but in the
white "ribs" of chili peppers, its placenta, that runs down the sides and
the middle of the chili peppers. Capsaicin is also unevenly distributed
throughout the flesh of chili peppers, so certain areas of a chili pepper
can be spicier than others. This compound is believed to be a part of the
defense mechanism of Capsicum plants.
There is confusion regarding the classification of Capsicum
species. Currently, all varieties of mild and hot peppers (not to be
confused with black and white pepper derived from Piper nigrum and
related species) are considered as the fruits of a single species, C.
annuum and its many varieties, or of 2 species, C. annuum and C.
frutescens. Current practice is to classify the pungent varieties of pepper
(chile peppers or cayenne peppers) as C. frutescens, and the milder-
5
flavored sweet peppers (bell peppers, sweet peppers, green peppers) as
varieties of C. annuum, however, most botanists agree that they should
properly be regarded as varieties of a single species.
Classification
Scientific name : Capsicum annuum L.
Family : Solanaceae
Common Names : Capsicum, chili pepper, hot pepper, cayenne, red
pepper, tabasco paprika pepper, sweet pepper, bell
pepper, green pepper.
Scientific name : Capsicum frutescens L.
Family : Solanaceae
Common name : Capsicum(Cayenne,Red Pepper)
Synonyms : Red Pepper, Bird Pepper, African Bird
Pepper ,African
Pepper,Chillies ,African Chilies,
Part Used : Fruit, ripe and dried.
Habitat : Zanzibar,but now grown in most tropical and sub-
tropical countries.
Therapeutic Applications of Capsicum:
6
Despite the widespread use of chili peppers in the diet, little is
known about the pharmacological activities of capsaicin in humans.
Cayenne was frequently used to treat diseases of the circulatory system.
It is still traditionally used in herbal medicine as a circulatory tonic.
a)Primary Uses: Arthritis, Bleeding, Blood Pressure (high/low),
Bronchitis, Poor circulation, Colds, Congestion, Diabetes, Fatigue,
Gastric Disorders, Heart Problems, strokes, Kidney Problems, Lung
Disorders, Phlebitis, Rheumatism, Shock, Tumors, Sore throat, Varicose
veins, Ulcers, anti-inflammation.
b)Secondary Uses: Arteriosclerosis, Asthma, Blood Impurities,
Bruises, Burns, Fevers, Gas, Infections, Jaundice, Malaria,
Mucus/excessive, Pain, Pancreatic Problems, Pus Discharge, Sinus
Problems, Skin Disorders, Spasms, Sunburns, Wounds.
The Healing Power of Capsicum describes remedies using
capsicum alone or in mixtures with ordinary items like lemon, vinegar,
olive oil, honey, garlic , aspirin and more for common health problems
like Angina, Clogged Arteries, Bruises and Sprains, Colds and Flu,
Cough, Diabetes, High Cholesterol, Headache, Neuralgia and
Obesity.
7
Hence chilies were highly nutritive and widespread in use ,
we are aimed to determine the nutritive content of chili in comparison
with hybrid chili.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the Nutrient contents in common chilies and hybrid chili.
Quantitative analysis of Biomolecules
8
Total carbohydrate Reducing sugar Starch Protein
Estimation of Vitamin- C
Ascorbic acid
Bioactive profile of pigments
Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll b
Determination of secondary product
Phenol
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Archeologists estimate that in Mexico, Capsicum was used as a
food as long as 9,000 years ago (Rumsfield and West, 1991). The
9
medicinal use of a number of Capsicum species, including C. annuum by
the Mayans, is described in Chichewicz and Thorpe (1996). They include
the use of roots, leaves, as well as the fruits in applications for infections,
fresh burns, respiratory complaints, earaches, and sores.
Regular ingestion of hot red pepper is recommended by some
authors for anorexia, hemorrhoids, liver congestion, varicose veins, and
vascular conditions (Duke, 1985). Pedersen (1994) states that "the most
striking use of Capsicum is as a catalyst herb in nearly every herbal
combination conceivable."
Capsicum was introduced into Britain from India in 1548, and
Gerard mentioned it as being cultivated in his time. The plant was
described by Linnaeus under the name of C. frutescens proper. This
species appeared in Miller's Garden Dictionary in 1771.
Chemical constituents
a) Nitrogenous compounds:
The most potent and predominant chemical entity in Capsicum is
capsaicin (0.14%) (Cordell and Araujo, 1993). A series of homologous
10
branched- and straight-chain alkyl vanillylamides, collectively known as
capsaicinoids. Of the capsaicinoid fraction, capsaicin (48.6%) is
quantitatively followed by 6,7-dihydrocapsaicin (36%),
nordihydrocapsaicin (7.4%), homodihydrocapsaicin (2%), and
homocapsaicin (2%) (Duke, 1985). Capsaicinoids and capsaicin are
collectively found in amounts of 0.1% to 1%, with quantities varying
according to soil and climate (Rumsfield and West, 1991).
Capsaicin, a colorless crystalline substance, was first synthesized
in 1930. Capsaicin has been studied since the mid-19th century and its
structure is elucidated as 8-methyl-6-nonenoyl vanillylamide (Cordell
and Araujo,1993).
The crude extract of Capsicum fruits, known as Capsicum
oleoresin, contains at least 100 different volatile chemical constituents,
and therefore may function in differing ways from pure capsaicin. Thus,
it is important to distinguish between studies using capsaicin and those
employing Capsicum oleoresin` (Cordell and Araujo, 1993).
b) Steroids
Other parts of the plant contain steroidal alkaloid glycosides
(solanine, solanidine, solasodine) (Newall et al., 1996). The seeds contain
11
the steroidal glycosides capsicoside A through D, all furostanol
glycosides (Yahara et al., 1994)
c) Other Constituents:
C. annuum is rich in carotenoid pigments, including capsanthin,
capsorubrin, carotene,luteine, zeaxanthin, and cucurbitaxanthin A)
(Leung and Foster, 1996; Hornero-M¨¦ndez and Manguez-Mosquera,
1998). Capsicum is also rich in fats (9-17%) and protein (12-15%)
(Leung and Foster, 1996) and is an excellent source of vitamin C (~370
mg/100 g) and vitamin A (77,000 IU/100 g, equivalent to 7,700 RE/100
g) (Ensminger et al., 1993). Volatile oils are present as a trace
component, including over 125 individual constituents, 24 of which have
been identified (Marsh, 1977).
History of Capsaicin:
P.A. Bucholtz in 1816 first discovered that the pungent
principle of peppers could be extracted from the macerated pods with
organic solvents. In 1846, L. T. Thresh reported in Pharmacy Journal that
the pungent principle could be extracted in a crystalline state. It was
Thresh who named the substance Capsaicin. In 1878, the Hungarian
medical scientist Endre Hogyes extracted Capsaicin, which he called
12
capsicol, and discovered that it stimulated the mucous membranes of the
mouth and stomach and increased the secretion of gastric juices.
Capsaicin was first synthesized in 1930 by E. Spath and F.S. Darling. It
has virtually no odor or flavor, but it is one of the most pungent
compounds known, detectable to the palate in dilutions of one to
seventeen million. It is slightly soluble in water, but very soluble in
alcohol, fats, and oils.
The word capsaicin actually describes a complex of related
components named capsaicinoids by Japanese chemists S. Kosuge and Y.
Inagaki in 1964. Capsaicinoids are the chemical compounds that give
chili peppers their bite.
Mode of Action
The Dispensatory of the United States of America, 23 ed.,
1943, states that "Capsicum is a powerful local stimulant, producing,
when swallowed, a sense of heat in the stomach, and a general glow over
the body without narcotic effect." Capsicum sp. are known to be very
strong local stimulants in the circulatory system. In studies performed on
female rabbits, capsaicin, the major constituent of cayenne, has been
13
shown to significantly lower both plasma cholesterol and triglycerides,
but even more important, lower the LDL-HDL ratio.
Besides its action as a local stimulant, Capsicum acts as a
powerful stimulant to the digestive tract when taken internally. Capsicum
is a gastric,stimulant,stomachic, carminative and an internal
tonic.Cayenne is of particular value for atonic gastric dyspepsia for atony
of the stomach and intestines and has been widely used to treat
flatulence. Capsicum is used externally as local counterirritant for
rheumatism, neuralgia, arthritis, chilblains and lumbago.Cayenne has
been used in North America, Europe, China and in India. It was listed in
Gerard (1597), Lewis (1769) and Comfort (1853). It can also be found in
Aztec herbals (1552).(Crellin, J.K. and Philpott, J., Herbal Medicine:
Past and Present (Vol. II), Duke University Press, London, 1990, p. 142.)
Functions
a) Cardiovascular and Circulatory Functions:
Yamato et al. (1996) showed that capsaicin produced a marked
concentration-dependent decrease in the amplitude, the rate of rise, and
the rate of relaxation of the contractile tension of rat ventricular papillary
14
muscles; however, the half-life of the relaxation and the time to peak
tension were only slightly effected.
b) Digestive and Gastrointestinal Fuctions:
The authors note, however, that while chili pepper, cayenne
pepper and paprika may loosen cell contacts to increase permeability of
the intestinal epithelium, other spices (bay leaf, black pepper, and
nutmeg) were found to decrease permeability (Jensen-Jarolim et al.,
1998).
The stimulatory effect of orally administered capsaicin on
gastric acid secretion and mucosal blood flow was studied in rats using
amounts roughly equivalent to a normal Thai diet. Capsaicin was noted to
have a protective effect on gastric mucosa of ethanol-induced gastric
lesions in rats (Uchida et al., 1991).
c) Immune Functions:
(i) Carcinogenicity/ Mutagenicity
A full review of capsaicin's carcinogenic and anticarcinogenic
potential (Suhr and Lee, 1996) provided theoretical evidence for both
effects from capsaicin. Ernst and Barnes (1998) refer to this study with
15
the comment that "Taken orally orally in regular high doses it may act as
a carcinogen and could promote gastric cancer, but in low doses it seems
to have anticarcinogenic activity." Duke (1985) points out that the low
incidence of gastric cancers in Latin America suggests that hot pepper,
with its many constituents, may be anticarcinogenic.
A 10% Capsicum, protein-deficient diet fed to rats led to a
54% increase in the incidence in hepatomas, suggesting that capsaicin
may contribute to the development of liver cancer. Nalini et al. (1998)
report that rats fed a diet containing red chili (8 mg/day/100 g body
weight) alone or with a carcinogenic substance (DMH, 1,2-dimethyl
hydrazine, 20 mg/kg, s.c.) in addition to the red chili showed a tumor
incidence of 83.3% and 93.3%, respectively.
Chili prepared by sun-drying, salting and deep-frying in
groundnut oil contains a high amount of carcinogenic 3,4-
benzo(a)pyrene. Long-term feeding studies in male mice with chili so-
prepared (100 mg/day) added to a laboratory rodent diet found that
whereas none of the controls developed tumors, the chili group showed a
35% incidence of adeno carcinoma in the abdomen over 2 yrs.
The authors comment that their results suggest the high
incidence of gastric cancer among the male population of Madras may
16
owe to the contributing factor of salted, sundried and oil-fried red chili
(Balachandran and Sivaramkrishnan, 1995).
Park et al. (1998) found tumor-promoting activity from
capsaicin lacking in a 2-stage skin carcinogenesis model in mice. Instead,
capsaicin, when administered at the same time as a tumor promoter (12-
O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate), was found to inhibit mouse skin
carcinogenesis.
(ii) Immune modulation:
The immunomodulatory effects of capsaicin are
varied and may be related to interactions with the neuropeptides
somatostatin and SP, a peptide made up of 11 amino acids and found
throughout the body in nerve cells and certain endocrine cells in the gut
In addition, increased vascular permeability promotes the
local delivery of both the protein and cellular components of adaptive
immunity, so that SP could augment the activity of T lymphocytes that
accumulate at the site of reaction (Payan et al., 1984).
(iii) Pharmacokinectics:
With respect to topical applications of capsaicin, it
has been estimated that assuming 100% of a topically-applied dose is
17
absorbed into the body, an application of 90 g capsaicin (2 tubes of
cream, 0.025% capsaicin) per week would result in a daily exposure of
0.064 mg/kg capsaicin for a 50 kg person. This represents less than 10%
of the dietary intake of a typical Indian or Thai diet (Rumsfield and West,
1991).
Safety Profile
a) Contraindications
Capsicum has been cited as contraindicated in topical
applications on damaged skin and near the eyes, and for internal use by
individuals who are sensitive to the herb and may in some cases develop
gastrointestinal irritations. Further contraindications in the German
Commission E are found in topical applications by individuals who are
allergic (sensitive) to Capsicum (Blumenthal et al., 1998).
Lynn (1990) describes that relatively mild capsaicin topical
treatment has been reported to worsen contact dermatitis and allergic
contact dermatitis in some individuals. Willard (1991) considers use of
Capsicum contraindicated in ulcers and chronic bowel irritation states.
Excessive doses have been said to cause severe irritation of
mucous membranes, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. The active, pungent
18
principle of Capsicum can be an irritant to the eyes and to tender skin,
producing a strong burning sensation.
b) Pregnancy
No documented cases of adverse effects from use of capsaicin
during pregnancy have been found. Brinker (1983) states that Capsicum
oleoresin was found to be a uterine stimulant in animals.
c) Side Effects
Initial topical application of capsaicin creams results in burning
sensations for most but not all people, which lessens or disappears with
repeated applications. Erythema often accompanies the burning,
sometimes with rash. Coughing and sneezing from aerosolized particles
from dried cream residues has also been noted in some studies.
Accidental contamination of other body parts, particularly the eyes,
mouth or perineal regions, can occur without careful hand-washing or the
use of rubber gloves for cream application (Mitchell and Rook, 1979). In
a controlled study, Jones et al. (1997) found that cool tap water was more
effective at providing immediate relief from the pain of chili burns of the
hands than room temperature vegetable oil. Immersing the hands in the
19
vegetable oil provided significantly better long-term pain relief, provided
the hands were immersed in the oil for at least 1 hour.
Capsaicin and capsaicinoids are strongly irritating to mucous
membranes and can produce dermatitis. Inhalation can produce allergic
alveolitis (Mitchell and Rook, 1979). Oral use of Capsicum and its
extractives may cause gastrointestinal irritation, though it does not inhibit
the healing of duodenal ulcers and does not need to be avoided by
persons with such a condition (Leacock, 1985).
Source:
The samples (common chilies and the hybrid chili) were collected
and weighed in required amount then it was smashed well using motor
and pestle then it was homogenized using the homogenizer and dissolve
in respective solvents. Then the mixture was centrifuged the supernatant
obtained was taken and the quantitative estimation was proceeded and
their values were read at respective optical densities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
20
ESTIMATION OF TOTAL CARBOHYRATE
(Anthrone method )
Principle:
Carbohydrate was first hydrolysed into simpler sugar using dilute
hydrochloric acid. In hot acidic medium glucose in dehydrated to
hydroxyl methyl funeral. This forms a green colored products with
phenol and at colorimetrically 490nm.
Reagents:
1. 2.5 hydrochloric acid
2. anthrone 2%
3. sulphuric acid965%
4. standard glucose solution (Stock standard)
5. Working standard
6. Source
100mg of the sample was weighed and it was hydrolysed by
keeping in a boiling water bath for 3 hours with 5ml of 2.5 N
Hydrochloric acid and cooled at room temperature. They were
neutralized with solid sodium carbonate until the effervescence
ceases.
Procedure:
21
The volume was made up to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1ml of the
working standard were piptted out in a series of test tubes. 0.2 ml of the
sample solution was pipetted out in another test tube. The volume was
made up to 1ml with distilled water in all the tubes. 5ml of 96% sulphuric
acid was added and mixed well. After 10 min the contents in the tubes
were shaken and placed in a water bath at 25-30 0C for 20 min. 4 ml of
anthrone reagent was added and heated for 8 minutes in boiling water
bath cooled rapidly and read at 680nm. The total carbohydrate present in
the sample was calculated using the standard graph.
22
ESTIMATION OF REDUCING SUGAR
(Somogyi, 1952)
Principle:
The reducing sugar when heated with alkaline copper tartarate reduce
the copper from the cuprous state and thus cuprous oxide was formed. When
cuprous oxide was treated with arsenomolybdic acid, the reduction of
molybdic acid to molybdenum blue takes place. The blue color developed
was compared with a set of standard in a colorimeter at 620nm.
Reagents:
1. Alkaline copper tartarate:
A. Dissolved 2.5 gm of anhydrous sodium carbonate, 2 gm of sodium
bicarbonate, 2.5 gm of potassium sodium tartarate and 20 gm of
anhydrous sodium sulphate in 80 ml of water and made up to 100
ml
B. Dissolve 15gm of copper sulphate in a small volume of distilled
water. Added one drop of sulphuric acid and made up to 100ml.
Before use , 4ml of B and 96ml of solution A were mixed.
2. Arsenomolybdate reagents:
Dissolve 2.5gm of ammonium molybdate in 45ml of water.
Added 2.5ml of sulphuric acid and mixed well. The 0.3gm of disodium
23
hydrogen arewsnate was dissolved in 25ml of water mixed well and
incubate at 370C for 24 to 48 hours.
3. stock standard glucose solution
4. working standard
Procedure:
Weighed 100mg of the sample and the sugar were extracted with hot
80% ethanol twice . the supernatant was collected and evaporated by
keeping it on a water bath at 800 C. 10ml of water was added and the sugar
were dissolved 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 ml of working standard solution and
0.2mml of the extract solution was pipetted out into a series of test tubes.
The volume in all tubes were made up to 2ml with distilled water was kept
as blank. 1ml of alkaline copper tatarate reagent was added to all tubes. The
tubes were kept in boiling water bath for 10 minutes. The tubes were cooled
and 1 ml of arsenomolybdic acid reagent was added to all the absorbance of
blue color was read at 620nm after 10minutes. From the graph the amount of
reducing sugar present in the sample was calculated.
24
ESTIMATION OF STARCH
( Mc Cready et al., 1950
Principle :
Perchloric acid was found to be a very efficient solvent for starch.
The residue rich in starch was solubilised with perchloric acid and were
determined colorimetrically with anthrone reagent.
Reagents:
1. 0.2% Anthrone reagent: 0.2 gm of anottrone dissolved in 100ml of
concentrated sulphuric acid.
2. 80% ethanol
3. 52% perchloric acid.
Extraction:
To 100 mg of powered few drops of 80% ethanol and 5ml of water
were added and stirred well. The soluble sugars were eliminated with
80% hot ethanol by repeated extraction. To the sugar free residue added
3ml of water and 6.5ml of 25% perchloric acid was added with constant
stirring. The tube was kept cool by immersing in an ice for 15 minutes.
Then 5ml of distilled water was added, mixed well and centrifuged. This
residue was then extracted with perchloric acid to ensure complete
25
extraction of starch. The combination extract was diluted to 100 ml using
distilled water.
Procedure :
0.5ml of the above solution was made up to 1ml with distilled
water to which 5ml of freshly prepared anthrone reagent was added and
cooled in an ice bath for 10 minutes. Blank and standard were treated in
the same way. The color intensity was measured in the wavelength of
620m against blank. Starch content was expressed as mg of starch per gm
dry weight.
26
ESTIMATION OF PROTEIN
( Lowry et al.,1951)
Principle:
The blue colour was developed by the reduction of the
phosphomolybdie phosphotungstic components. The Folin-ciocalteau
reagent by the amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan present in the protein
plus the colour developed by the biuret reaction of the protein with the
alkaline cupric tartarate was measured in the Lowry’s method.
Reagents:
1. Reagent A : 2% sodium carbonate in 0.1N sodium hydroxide.
2. Reagent B : 0.5% copper sulphate (CuSO4: 5H20) in 1%
potassium sodium tartarate
3. Reagent C : Alkaline copper sulphate solution : Mixed 50ml of
A and I ml of B prior to use.
4. Reagent D : Folin- Ciocalteau Reagent :
Refluxed gently for 10 hours a mixture consisting of
100g sodium tungstate, 25gm sodium molybdate, 700 ml water,
50ml water and a few drops of bromine water. Boiled the mixture
for 15 min without condenser to remove excess bromine. Cooled,
diluted to 1 liter and filtered.
27
5. Protien solution : weighed accurately 50 gm of Bovine Serum
Albumin and dissolve in distilled water and made up to 50 ml in
standard flask.
6. Working standard : diluted 10ml of the stock solution to 50ml with
distilled water in a standard flask.
Procedure:
Extraction of protein from sample:
Weighed 500mg of the sample and grinded well a pestle and
mortar in 10ml of the phosphate buffer. Centrifuged and used the
supernatant for estimation.
Estimation of protein :
Pipetted out 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 ml of the working standard into
a series of test tubes. Pipetted out 0.1 of the sample extract in another
test tube. The volume was made up to 1 ml in all test tubes. A tube with 1
ml of water served as a blank. Added 5 ml of reagent C to all the tubes
including the blank. Mixed well and allowed to stand for 10 min then
0.5ml of reagent D was added , mixed well incubated at room
temperature in the dark for 30 min . Blue color was developed. Reading
were taken in spectrophotometer at 660 nm. Standard graph was drawn
and the amount of protein in the sample was calculated.
28
ESTIMATION OF ASCORBIC ACID
Di-chloro- Indo-phenol Method
Principle
The dye which is blue in alkaline solution and red in acid solution
is reduced by ascorbic acid to a colorless compound as the same time
ascorbic acid is oxidized to dichloroascorbic acid. The reaction is
quantitative and specific for ascorbic acid in the pH range of 1-3.5.
Reagents:
1. 4% oxalic acid solution
2. Dye solution
3. Stock standard ascorbic acid
4. Working standard
5. Source
100 mg of sample was weighed and the juice was extracted
with 4% oxalic aid and make up to 1000ml with 4% oxalic acid.
Procedure:
Titration – I
Std Ascorbic acid Vs dye
5ml of std Ascorbic acid solution was pipetted out into a clean
conical flask and added 5ml of 4% oxalic acid. This was titrated against
29
dye solution taken in the burette. The end point was appearance of
permanent pale pink colour. The titration was repeated for concordant
value.
Dye factor = 0.5
Titer value
Titration – II
Test solution Vs dye
5ml of sample was pipetted out into a clean conical flask and 5ml
of 4% oxalic acid. It was then titrate against the dye solution taken in the
bottle. The end point was the appearance of permanent pale pink color.
30
ESTIMATION OF CALCIUM
(Clark and Collip)
Principle:
Both ionic and protein bound calcium is precipitated as calcium
oxalate by adding ammonium oxalate solution. The calcium oxalate
precipitated is dissolved in acid and titrated against standard potassium
permanganate at about 800C. Calcium is calculated from the titer value.
Procedure:
Pipette out 1 ml of the sample in a centrifuge tube. Add 3ml of
distilled water and 1ml of 4% ammonium oxalate. Mix the contents and
allow to stand for 30 minutes. For the calcium to precipitate after 30
minutes centrifuge for about 15 minutes at 300rpm discard the
supernatant add 3ml of 2% ammonia to the precipitate mixed well and
centrifuge. Repeat the process of centrifuging and discarding for 2-3
times.
To the washed precipitate add 2ml of 1N H2SO4 keep the tubes in
the beaker containing water and heat to about 80oc for contents in a hot
condition against 0.01N KMNO4. The end point is the appearance of faint
pink color which persists for a minute.
31
ESTIMATION OF TOTAL PHENOL
(Bray and Thorp,1954)
Principle:
Estimation of phenol with folin-phnol reagents was based on the
reaction between phenol and an oxidizing agent phosphomolybdate
which results in the formation of a blue color. The intensity of color
developed was read colorimetrically at 650nm.
Reagents:
1. Folin phenol reagent
2. Sodium carbonate 20%
3. Catechol stock standard
4. Working standard was prepared by diluting 10ml of stock to
100ml.
Procedure:
1ml of the extract was pipetted out into a test tube and 1 ml of
folin-phenol following by 2ml of sodium carbonate were added. The
tubes was shaken and heated in a boiling water bath for exactly 1 min
then it was cooled under the tap water. The blue colour developed was
diluted to 25ml with distilled water and its absorbance was measured
calorimetrically at 650nm. The unknowns were read from a standard
32
curve made from different concentration of catechol. A blank containing
all the reagents minus plants extract was used to adjust the absorbance to
zero.
33
ESTIMATION OF CHLOROPHYLL
Principle:
Chlorophyll was extracted in 80% acetone and the absorption at
663 and 645nm were read in a spectrophotomer. Using the absorption
coefficient the amount of chlorophyll was calculated.
Reagents:
80% Acetone
Procedure:
1 gm of fresh capsicum were cut into small pieces and
homogenized in a motor using pestle using 80% acetone. Decanted and
filtered the supernatant through a funnel using Whatman No. 42 filter
paper. Added sufficient quantity of 80% acetone and repeated the
extraction. Transferred the contents from the motor to a funnel and
washed the brei with acetone until it become colourless. Pooled the
filtrates and made up the volume to 100ml in a volumetric flask.
Transferred,5ml of the extract into a 50ml volumetric flask and diluted by
making up the volume with 80% acetone. Measured the absorbance at
645 and 663nm for the determination of chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b
and total chlorophyll.
34
The chlorophyll content was calculated on the fresh weight basis
using the formula:
mg chlorophyll a/g tissue = 12.7 (A663) -2069(A645) x V
1000 x W
mg chlorophyll b/g tissue = 22.9 (A645)- 4.68(A663) x V
1000 x W
mg total chlorophyll b/g tissue = 20.2(A645) +8.02 (A663) x V
1000 x W Where,
A - Absorbance at specific wavelengths,
V - Final volume of chlorophyll extract in 80% acetone
W – Fresh weight of tissue extract
35
ESTIMATION OF CAROTENOIDS
Carotenoid extraction:
Total carotenoid was extracted from the muscles, exoskeleton
abdomen, hepato pancreas and gills. For extraction of carotenoids
solvent such as acetone lacetonitrile in the ratio of 95:5 was used. The
sample were homogenized well until the pigment was completely
extracted. The sample were centrifuged at 500rpm for 10 minutes and the
supernatant was allowed to condensed to a minimum volume in a water
bath at 40oc. the sample were stored in deep freezers from this sample
both quantitative and qualitative analysis were carried out.
Estimation of Total carotenoids
The extracted carotenoids from each sample was diluted to
appropriate volume and the optical density was measured. The same time
solvent used for extraction of carotenoids was used for dilution. After
dilution optical density was measured at 440nm.
Total carotenoids in the sample was estimated using the formula
C- Carotenoid content V- Volume of sample
D- Optical density F- Dilution factor
36
C = DVF
2500
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
As we are using a large number of common chilies in our day to
day life, our “PROJECT STUDY OF NUTRIENT CONTENTS OF
COMMON CHILIES IN COMPARISON WITH HYBRID CHILI”
has its own use.
Of the common chilies pepper is found to be more nutritious in all
respect to the all the ingredients present in it, so when it is compared with
Hybrid chili the result obtained is as follows.
The fig: 1 shows that Total carbohydrate content is 98mg/dl in
pepper and while in hybrid chili it is only 3 mg/dl.
The fig: 2 shows that Total reducing sugar content in the common
chili is 150% in pepper where as the hybrid chili contain only 32%.
Fig: 3 shows that Starch content is 91 mg/dl in pepper while in
hybrid chili it is 3.5 mg/dl.
The fig: 4 shows that the Protein content is 160 mg/dl in pepper
where as the hybrid chili contain 80mg/dl.
The fig:5 shows that the Ascorbic acid content is 15mg/dl in
pepper while the hybrid contains 9.2mg/dl.
The fig: 6 shows that the Calcium content in the pepper is
28/mg/dl and 13mg/dl in the hybrid chili.
37
The fig:7 shows that the Phenol content is 5 mg/dl in pepper and in
hybrid it is 3.5 mg/dl.
The fig:8(a) and fig: 8(b) shows that the chlorophyll a and
chlorophyll b content is more over equal in all the chilies.
Fig: 9 shows that the carotenoid content is found to be higher in
Dry chili, 0.002 mg/dl and least in Hybrid chili, 0.00032 mg/dl.
38
Comparison of Nutrient contents in Chilies
Total Carbohydrate
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Total Carbohydrate (Anthrone method) 98 mg/dl 3 mg/dl 60 mg/dl 76 mg/dl 90 mg/dl
39
Total Reducing Sugar
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Total Reducing Sugar 150 % 32 % 40 % 30 % 35 %
40
Starch
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Starch 91 mg/dl 3.5 mg/dl 1.5 mg/dl 4.5 mg/dl 4 mg/dl
41
Protein
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Protein ( Lowry’s Method) 160 mg/dl 80 mg/dl 96 mg/dl 100 mg/dl 70 mg/dl
42
Ascorbic acid
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Ascorbic acid ( Di-chloro-indo-phenol method)
15 mg/dl 9.2 mg/dl 96 mg/dl 100 mg/dl 70 mg/dl
43
Calcium
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Calcium 28 mg/dl 13 mg/dl 14 mg/dl 12 mg/dl 8 mg/dl
44
Phenol
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Phenol 5 mg/dl 3.5 mg/dl 1.5 mg/dl 4.5 mg/dl 4 mg/dl
45
Clorophyll a
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Chlorophyll a 0.032 mg 0.033 mg 0.30 mg 0.009 mg 0.015 mg
46
Chlorophyll b
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Chlorophyll b 0.056 mg 0.056 mg 0.044 mg 0.020 mg 0.027 mg
47
Carotenoids
Nutritive contentsPepper (Black
pepper)
Capsicum (Bell
pepper)
Green Chili (Cayenne)
Dry Chili (Cayenne)
Pandi Chili (Pimento)
Carotenoids 0.001 mg 0.00032 mg 0.0004 mg 0.002 mg 0.0008 mg
48
CONCLUSION
The project “Study of Nutrient Content of Common Chilies in
Comparison with Hybrid Chili.” We came to the conclusion that common
chilies are more nutritious than the hybrid one and of them Pepper is
highly nutritious because it contains higher concentration of
Biomolecules such as Total protein, Reducing sugar, Starch, Protein etc.
mineral content is also higher in pepper. While analyzing the Vitamin
content that also showed positive result for pepper only. So from all these
we can say that pepper is highly nutritious.
While analyzing the pigment chlorophyll it is often more or less
equal in all chilies. But the Carotinoid content is some what higher in red
chili.
The secondary metabolite such as phenol was also found in more
amounts in the Pepper When compared with others and this is a notable
point because even though the chilies have good qualities like the
capability of wound healing, it also helps in some metabolic activities.
Due to the presence of higher concentration of Phenol content, the over
49
consumption of chilies like Pepper may lead to carcinogenic diseases and
other toxic effects.
Project work done by
Aneesh.D
Sreejith.S.Nair
Jones Kensy
Starlet Priya
Priya.L
Submitted to
Department of Biochemistry
Malankara Catholic College, Mariagiri
Kaliakkavila, Kanyakumari,
Tamil Nadu,
India-629 153
50