strategic partner market testing 10 december 2012 welcome
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
• Housekeeping• Introduction to HCC • The Strategic Partner Project• Theme 1 Discussion - Capacity• Break• Theme 2 Discussion – Supply Chain• Theme 3 Discussion – Scope• Q&A• Close and Networking
Summary
• Introduction to Hampshire County Council Property Services
• Key issues for Property Services in the future• Vision for a Strategic Partnership
Introduction to HampshireProperty Services
• 7,000 buildings on 1,000 sites – 1.5 million m2• Schools, social care, recreation and offices• In-house professional team: 300 staff• Large rural landholding including County Farms• Manage Construction Frameworks on behalf of
public sector in the South East and London
Introduction to Hampshire Property Services
• Provide services to 97% of schools (including Academies)
• Design and deliver a Capital Programme of £50 million + each year in Hampshire
• Joint working arrangements with Reading Borough Council, Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service, Surrey and West Sussex County Councils
• One third of income is from public sector partnerships
• Significant capital receipts generated (£300 million in 20 years)
Key Issues for PropertyServices and a Strategic Partnership
• Public sector leadership• Political support• Reduction in revenue funding/increase in capital• Opportunities to collaborate across the public
sector• Capacity and expertise from private sector
Vision For AStrategic Partnership
• Innovation and leadership in the public sector• Public and private sectors working jointly to
deliver an excellent service• Longer term arrangements than frameworks• Flexibility to provide services to us and other
public sector partners• Potential expansion opportunities in the public
sector• The best of the local supply chain alongside
regional/national capacity
iESE Regional Framework Successes
• First generation framework June 2006 to June 2011
• 194 Projects £1.6bn• Contracting Authorities 62• Demonstrable benefits £110m• Average 7%
Team Performance – 83% against a target of 80%Customer satisfaction – 87% against a target of 75% AIR - 146 against National Average of 503
Cost Predictability & Time Predictability
NO claims
Average of c. 2% Average of
< 2%
Performance Measurement – key to success
Performance data
LocalismLocal Contracting – 67%SME Engagement – 73%Apprenticeships – 1203
Sustainability Waste Diverted 82.9% from Landfill 268,000 tonnes
Shared Services – Programme Office
Programme
Management
Design
Cos
t M
anag
emen
t
Pla
nn
ingP
rocu
rem
e
nt
Supp
ly
Chai
n
Quality Assurance
GO
V E R N A N CE
Skills
Resources
Development
Current Consultancy arrangements
Structural & Civil Engineering & Design
Quantity Surveying
Landscape Architecture & Ecology
Mechanical & Electrical Engineering Design
Building Control Services
Transport Planning
Planning & Urban Design
CDM Co-ordinator Services
Building Surveying Services
Structural Inspection
IESE / Buying Solutions Regional Consultancy Framework
What do we want from the procurement?
• Not a single partner for the whole business• 4 different partners for the 4 “lots”• Suppliers can bid for any or all “lots”• Suppliers can win only one “lot”• Consortia welcomed – raises issues:
– same supplier could be represented across all “lots”
– same supplier could bid for different consortia in same “lot”
Strategic Alliance to Deliver Programmes of work
DesignCost / Project
Management
Development
Management
Strategic Alliance
Highways &
Transportation
Partner Authority A
Partner Authority B
Economy Transport Environment
Performance Measurement at all levels of Service
Strategic Alliance
Partner
Are we achieving the key success criteria for the Alliance?
Is the partner achieving pre-agreed performance targets?
Are we achieving task based productivity targets
Tasks / Individuals