strategic communities of practice
TRANSCRIPT
Strategic
Communities
of Practice
What should we be paying attention to,
doing and valuing? Nancy White
Full Circle Associates
http://www.fullcirc.com
Welcome! Write your
name beneath a chair
and get comfortable!
Choconancy’s chairs http://www.fullcirc.com
PART 1: BASIC
VOCABULARY
Where we develop a way to
describe our work with
communities
What we care about
DOMAIN
What and how we do things
together about it
PRACTICE
Who cares about it
COMMUNITY
Practical hint: all three of these “legs” change over time. The trick is not to have all
three changing at the same time. That can be very destabilizing for a community!
Tech +
Social:Technology has
fundamentallychanged how we can
be togetherhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/exper/1477729345/
DOMAIN
PRACTICECOMMUNITY
What we care
about
What we do
together about it
Who cares about it
Meets needs of sponsors,
leaders and members
Broad enough to attract
Focused enough to matter
in our work
Often shifts over time
Drives the “who” and the
“what we do”
What We Care
About:
What are we about?
What is ouridentity?
What is the significance?
To our Organization
To us as individuals
Practical
Purpose
Points
Is it clear?
Is it sharable?
Is it inviting?
to teams
individuals
Is it reasonable?
Is it negotiable?
What we care about
What we do
together about it
Whocares
about it
It relates to my identity
Connects me to other
people “like me”
Holds sufficient diversity
People who have time
& attention to engage
Involves
relationships
What we care about
What we do together about it
Who cares
about it
Activities
Content people
use, create & share
How people
engage with each
other to learn/do
things
How people apply
what they learn in the
community back at
their work
How are you feeling right now? Draw…
http://www.austinkleon.com/2009/07/27/how-to-draw-faces/
http://www.davegrayinfo.com/2010/10/28/drawing-facial-expressions/
How to draw faces? Check out Austin Kleon and Dave Gray
How are you feeling right now? Draw…
LET‟S LOAD UP A WHITE BOARD AND
TRY…
AFTE
R!
… meetings
… relationships
… community
cultivation
… access to
expertise
… projects
… context
… individual
participation
… content
publishing
… open-ended
conversation
Community
activities
oriented to …
Base material from:
Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for
communities
© 2009 Wenger, White, and Smith
activities
oriented to …
Community Name: KM4Dev
global knowledge sharing network
… open-ended
conversation
… meetings
… projects
… access to
expertise
… relationships
… context… community
cultivation
… individual
participation
… content
publishing
Base material from:
Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for
communities
© 2009 Wenger, White, and Smith
With only one meeting a
year, large size and
diversity, KM4Dev
focuses on enabling
individual participation.
Community knowledge wiki,
content management system
to bring together resources.
Email list is core of
community activity
Once a year and only about
10% do/can participate.
When funding allows. E.G.
supporting ShareFair
Informally via the email list
by asking/answering
questions.
Relationships mostly via
meetings and core group.
Strongly
external – all
resources
public/shared.While everyone pays
attention to the
community, no
centralized efforts…
activities
oriented to …
Example: The Environmental
Resource Network
… open-ended
conversation
… meetings
… projects
… access to
expertise
… relationships
… context… community
cultivation
… individual
participation
… content
Monthly meetings with
everyone at the university
concerned about the
environment, shared calendars
Awareness events,
orientation for environmental
student groups, workshops
Inviting experts to monthly
meetings/events/workshop
s
Twitter, Facebook,
email list, member
directories
Public. Minutes are
shared. Network is
accountable to all
students who pay a
levy
Members connected
through a shared
interest
Anyone with an interest in the
environment can be a member
but the network targets active
student groups, rss
Blog,
website,
Bump into another
member? Have a
conversation, emails
Base material from: Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for communities, © 2009 Wenger, White, and Smith
activities
oriented to …
ERN and KM4Dev-ers
… open-ended
conversation
… meetings
… projects
… access to
expertise
… relationships
… context
… community
cultivation
… individual
participation
… content
publishing
Base material from:
Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for
communities
© 2009 Wenger, White, and Smith
PART 2:
ENGAGEMENT
FROM
3 PERSPECTIVES
Where we pay attention
to our stakeholders…
Strategic Value
Strategic Options
Strategic Practices
Three strategic
perspectives:
Mitigation/AdaptationVulnerability/ResilienceMeasurable/accountable
Communities and… the broader strategic continuum
LeadershipDesign repertoireLife or death practices Measurable
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Three stakeholder
perspectives:
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Three stakeholder
perspectives:Strategic goals
Resources
M & E
Results
Role &
task clarity
Feedback
Purpose
Ease
Value
Strategic goalsResourcesM & EResults
Role & task clarityFeedback
PurposeEase
Value
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Sponsors
Strategic goals
Resource provision
Monitoring & evaluation
Communication of results
Poll #2: What might be some of
the intended and unintended
impacts of sponsors on
community engagement?
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Facilitators &
Leaders Role clarity
Task clarity
Feedback
What does your community
leadership look like online?
Put your ideas in the chat…
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Members
Clarity of purpose
Ease of use
Efficient of time
Sponsors
Facilitators and
Leaders
Members
Bridging Across
Perspectives
PART 3: ROLES
&
FRAMEWORKS
What is the magic sauce?
enable people to…• discover &
appropriate useful
technology
• be in and use
communities &
networks (people)
• express their
identity
• find and create
content
• usefully participate
facilitators
community leaders
technology stewards
network weavers
Independent thinkers
curators
moderatorsFor example see:
http://wenger-trayner.com/blog/leadership-groups-for-social-learning/
Mendazibal:
6 Network
Functions
• Filters
• Amplifiers
• Convenors
• Facilitators
• Investors
• Community
builders
http://www.odi.org.uk/Rapid/Projects/PPA0103/Functions.html
FAO‟s
“Nine Keys to a Successful
Thematic Knowledge Networks
Don Tapscott
Design for Connection
http://community-roundtable.com/2010/01/the-value-of-community-management/
http://tomhumbarger.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/the-importance-of-active-community-
management-proved-with-real-data/
Facilitation & Management
Tom’s Analysis• Membership growth slows significantly – Community membership grew
62% from January to July at a average clip of 55 new members per
week. From July to December, the membership only grew 13% at an
average clip of 20 members per week. This is a fall-off of more than 63% on
a week to week basis.
• Number of visits drop 60% - The number of visits from January through July
averaged more than 1,300 per week. For the second half of the year,
average visits dropped nearly 60% to an average of 522 per week.
• Number of pages viewed per visit drops 22% - Not only did the number of
visits drop, the number of pages per visit also decreased by 22% with the
average pages per visit going from 3.76 to 2.95.
• Time on site decreases by 33% – Driven by the fewer page views, the time
on site in minutes during active management was 3:38 vs. 2:37 after July
which is a 1:19 or 33% decrease.
• Fresh activity on the site since August has been pretty nonexistant as well –
just 10 new blog posts, 4 new file uploads, and less than 25 discussion forum
questions or comments have been posted.
Glenda Eoyang
• Observe. Don‟t waste a good surprise. Pause and wonder when
something unexpected arises. It may be the weak signal
foreshadowing something important to come.
• Connect. Nothing co-evolves in isolation. The key is connecting in
inquiry with the environment, with current and historical patterns,
and with other thoughtful people.
• Question. Our assumptions blind us to the world around and lock
us into our long-held problems and their failed solutions. A good
question can break through the expected to discover the possible.
• Try it out. Of course expectations based on past experience will
make us question anything we haven't experienced. To see
something new, we really have to see it. Try a new idea out, see
what happens, adjust and try again. We call this adaptive
action. Reward thoughtful risk taking.http://bit.ly/lPyXxJ
• From :
http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/04/spreading_critical_behaviors_v.html
• Formal programmatic efforts to change behaviors work mostly on the
rational side of human behavior
• Informal experiential efforts can capture the emotional side
• Programmatic change takes more time& costs more and encounters
more resistance than "viral" change
• You need both over time
• A "viral" effort usually begins with a few respected "master motivators”
• Insights & approaches of the motivators work best in experiential
settings
• Experiential momentum sustained informally & formally
• The most important lesson: importance of cross-organization energy
& its dependence on the informal
Balancing the Formal and the Informal
Community Maturity Model TM
Strategy
Leadership
Culture
Community
Management
Content &
Programming
Policies &
Governance
Tools
Metrics &
Measurement
Stage 1
HierarchyStage 2
Emergent
Community
Stage 3
CommunityStage 4
Networked
Familiarize &
Listen
Command &
Control
Reactive
None
Formal &
Structured
No Guidelines for
UGC
Consumer tools
used by
individuals
Anecdotal
Participate
Consensus
Contributive
Informal
Some user
generated
contentRestrictive social
media policies
Consumer & self-
service tools
Basic Activities
Build
Collaborative
Emergent
Defined roles &
processes
Community
created content
Flexible social
media policies
Mix of consumer &
enterprise tools
Activities &
Content
Integrate
Distributed
Activist
Integrated roles &
processes
Integrated formal
& user generated
Inclusive
„Social‟ functionality
is integrated
Behaviors &
Outcomes
http://community-roundtable.com/
Short term, focused
Explicit purposeCalendar of events, often associated with an event
Defined resources
Defined membership
Starts, works, finishes.
Broad, content as attractor
Information aggregation or source
Defined resources
Little member decision making
Requires long term commitment to content creation and curation
May not stimulate individual engagement, but lots of visits.
Little member “ownership” or association (identity)
Small experiments
Small group tries something
Often emerges out of events
People are attracted and join
Structure emerges from experiments
Often little/no resources
Can be a source of innovation that can then be more formally supported and scaled. May not align with sponsor goals. Look for phase change to more structure.
Maturity
Growth
Launch
• Go forward
• Iterating/refining
• End
• Content capture
• Diversification
• Sub communities
• More roles
• New and Old members
• On-boarding
• Core/periphery
• Structure
• Small, structured
• Open, emergent
• Core members
• Key events
Wenger, Trayner & de Laat
Promoting and assessing value creation
in communities and networks: a
conceptual framework
– Immediate Value (what happened)
– Potential Value (what was produced)
–Applied Value (what difference did it make)
–Realized Value (impact)
–Reframing Value (what‟s changed?)
http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/publications/evaluation-framework/
Measure!
http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/publications/evaluation-framework/
Measure
Next?
Talk, write, Skype, Tweet
http://www.fullcirc.com
@NancyWhite
Some rights reserved by Eleaf
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eleaf/2536358399/sizes/m/in/photostream/