status epilepticus in adults: a review of diagnosis...

13
©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2016892 Neurology/Neurosurgery Status epilepticus is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus is frequently underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated, which can lead to permanent neuronal damage resulting in disability or death. Despite the frequent occurrence and morbidity associated with status epilepticus, this topic has received little attention within the literature. A systematic approach to treatment should start with management of airway, breathing, and circulation, followed by administration of benzodiazepines and intravenous antiepileptic drugs, and rapid escalation of therapy to prevent mor- bidity and mortality. Armed with the information in this article, nurses will have a higher-level understand- ing of what to do when encountering a patient in status epilepticus. (Critical Care Nurse. 2016;36[2]:62-73) Thomas Lawson, RN, MS, ACNP-BC Susan Yeager, RN, MS, CCRN, ACNP-BC Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Review of Diagnosis and Treatment M inutes can seem like a lifetime when a nurse encounters a patient having a seizure. A seizure that continues into status epilepticus changes from a stressful situation into a life-threatening emergency. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus published by the Neurocritical Care Society 1 in 2012 are used here to provide definitions and describe the pathophysi- ology, diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, and nursing considerations when caring for a patient in status epilepticus. With this information, nurses will be able to systematically provide treatment to sup- port patients during this emergency. Incidence and Definitions The incidence of status epilepticus varies by region and age. Incidence ranges from 9.9 to 15.8 per 100 000 persons in Europe to 18.3 to 41 per 100 000 persons in the United States. 2,3 The distribution is bimodal, with higher incidence in the first decade of life and then dramatically escalating incidence fol- lowing the fifth decade. 4,5 Risk of death from status epilepticus ranges from 1.9% to 40%, with the wide variation dependent on age, cause, and duration. 3 62 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org Lawson4_16pgs.indd 62 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018 http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: tranduong

Post on 11-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2016892

Neurology/Neurosurgery

Status epilepticus is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus is frequently underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated, which can lead to permanent neuronal damage resulting in disability or death. Despite the frequent occurrence and morbidity associated with status epilepticus, this topic has received little attention within the literature. A systematic approach to treatment should start with management of airway, breathing, and circulation, followed by administration of benzodiazepines and intravenous antiepileptic drugs, and rapid escalation of therapy to prevent mor-bidity and mortality. Armed with the information in this article, nurses will have a higher-level understand-ing of what to do when encountering a patient in status epilepticus. (Critical Care Nurse. 2016; 36[2]:62-73)

Thomas Lawson, RN, MS, ACNP-BCSusan Yeager, RN, MS, CCRN, ACNP-BC

Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Review of Diagnosis and Treatment

Minutes can seem like a lifetime when a nurse encounters a patient having a seizure. A seizure that continues into status epilepticus changes from a stressful situation into a life-threatening emergency. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus published by

the Neurocritical Care Society1 in 2012 are used here to provide definitions and describe the pathophysi-ology, diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, and nursing considerations when caring for a patient in status epilepticus. With this information, nurses will be able to systematically provide treatment to sup-port patients during this emergency.

Incidence and DefinitionsThe incidence of status epilepticus varies by region and age. Incidence ranges from 9.9 to 15.8 per

100 000 persons in Europe to 18.3 to 41 per 100 000 persons in the United States.2,3 The distribution is bimodal, with higher incidence in the first decade of life and then dramatically escalating incidence fol-lowing the fifth decade.4,5 Risk of death from status epilepticus ranges from 1.9% to 40%, with the wide variation dependent on age, cause, and duration.3

62 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 62 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

Defi nition of status epilepticus has varied through-out the decades depending on the duration of seizure. Status epilepticus is currently defi ned as “5 minutes or more of continuous clinical and/or electrographic seizure activity or recurrent seizure activity without recovery (returning to baseline) between seizures.”1 The defi ni-tion of status epilepticus has evolved through the 20th century from “the maximum expression of epilepsy” in 1904, to more than 30 minutes of continuous seizure activity from the 1960s to the early 2000s.6 The current defi nition’s more inclusive criteria refl ect the need for urgent treatment. Although status epilepticus is defi ned as 5 minutes or more of clinical or electrographic seizure, refractory status epilepticus is defi ned as clinical or electrographic seizures after adequate dosing of an ini-tial benzodiazepine and a secondary antiepileptic drug (AED).1 Others have used the term “super-refractory status epilepticus,” to describe continued status epilepti-cus 24 hours after administering anesthetic therapy or recurring status epilepticus after reduction in anesthetic dose.7 Convulsive status epilepticus involves jerking rhythmic movements of the arms and/or legs.1 Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is electrographic, ongoing seizure activity without the motor fi ndings of convulsive status. Table 1 lists signs of NCSE. Regardless of the exact defi nition, prompt recognition, diagnosis, and emergent treatment are key to minimizing neurologic sequelae. Recognition begins with a basic understanding of the pathophysiology that underlies status epilepticus.

PathophysiologyNormal neuronal activity occurs through a balance

of complex cellular-level mechanisms. The resting mem-brane potential is maintained across the cell wall of a

neuron by the sodium-potassium pump. This mechanism pumps sodium and chloride to high concentrations into the interstitial space and potassium to high concentrations within the cell. When a suffi cient stimulus is applied, an action potential is realized and the cell depolarizes.9 Neurotransmitters excite or inhibit other neurons. Normal brain function is a result of balance between inhibition and excitation. Glutamate is the most common excitatory neurotransmitter and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the most common inhibitory transmitter.10 During status epilepticus, failure of the inhibitory GABAergic mechanisms can cause the seizures to become self-sustaining and pharmacoresistant.11 Benzodiazepine resistance may develop after 10 to 45 minutes of status epilepticus, possibly because of changes in synaptic physiology that reduce the number of GABAA receptors.11 GABAA-enhancing drugs such as benzodiazepines, bar-biturates, propofol, and some anesthetics are effective at stopping seizures by overwhelming the excitation with inhibitory stimulation, but withdrawal of these inhibitory medications may provoke rebound seizures

Authors

Thomas Lawson is an acute care nurse practitioner in the neuroscience critical care unit at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Susan Yeager is the lead acute care nurse practitioner in the neuro-science critical care unit at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and a clinical instructor at The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio.

Corresponding author: Thomas Lawson, RN, MS, ACNP-BC, Neuroscience Critical Care, The Ohio State University Medical Center Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, 7th Floor, Columbus OH, 43210 (e-mail: [email protected]).

To purchase electronic or print reprints, contact the American Association of Critical- Care Nurses, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 899-1712 or (949) 362-2050 (ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, [email protected].

Table 1 Possible signs of status epilepticusa

NonconvulsiveAggression

Automatisms

Blinking

Crying

Delirium

Delusions

Echolalia

Facial twitching

Laughter

Nausea/vomiting

Eye deviation contralateral to lesion

Perseveration

Psychosis

Tremulousness

Aphasia

Amnesia

Catatonia

Staring

ConvulsiveConvulsive syncope

Repetitive decerebrate or decorticate posturing

Involuntary movement disorders

Psychogenic nonepileptic spells (pseudo-seizures)

a Based on information from Bazil and Pedley.8

www.ccnonline.org CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No 2, APRIL 2016 63

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 63 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

as the inhibitory/excitatory balance is tipped toward excitation.10 Seizure activity, whether nonconvulsive or convulsive, causes intense metabolic demands that require increased cerebral blood fl ow. This workload increases during the fi rst seconds of a seizure.12 Even during the fi rst few minutes of a seizure, the normally tight cou-pling of neuronal activity, energy demand, and cerebral blood fl ow is decoupled because of the very high energy demands of seizing neurons in the context of limited circulatory delivery of energy to cells that store essen-tially no energy.12,13

When this increased cellular metabolic demand is not met, neuronal damage and cell death result.14,15 Unmet neuronal metabolic demand is not the only factor respon-sible for cell death. The massive depolarization of the neuronal action potential during seizures leads to exces-sive release of glutamate, which activates postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, triggering an infl ux of calcium into the cell.16,17 Maintaining neuronal homeo-stasis requires large quantities of energy, but neurons do not generally use stored energy and are particularly susceptible to energetic stress.13,18 Thus during an event of status epilepticus, cellular homeostasis fails and high concentrations of intracellular calcium enter the mito-chondria, which then lose their membrane potential, and mitochondrial respiration fails with a cascade ending in cell necrosis.16,17 The pathophysiologic changes and resulting neuronal injury resulting from status epilepti-cus demand urgent, aggressive diagnosis and treatment.

Risk Factors for SeizureVarious factors can put a patient at higher risk of

transitioning from seizure to status epilepticus. Specifi c factors can have a greater impact within different age groups, but seizure history alone increases a patient’s risk regardless of age. Following a single unprovoked seizure, risk of further seizure is 40% to 52%, and after 2 seizures, the risk is 73%.19 Age-related risk factors for status epilepticus are listed in Table 2. Additional causes that decrease seizure threshold can be broken down into structural, infectious, metabolic, and drug-related cate-gories. Examples of structural factors include neoplasms, stroke, or traumatic brain injury. Infection, virus, fever, and metabolic derangements such as hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, hepatic encephalopathy, hypocalemia, and hypomagnesemia also create environ-ments that increase a patient’s risk of status epilepticus.

Toxic effects of drugs as well as some antiepileptic agents can also contribute to seizures (Table 3).20 Therefore, when eliciting a patient’s history, a clinician should have a heightened clinical suspicion of status epilepticus if any of these factors is present.

Patient’s HistoryThe initial encounter after stabilization should include

an interview seeking details of the period surrounding the seizure. This interview should occur with the patient if coherent and with the bedside staff and a knowledge-able family member. Questions should clarify the patient’s seizure history. Of particular importance in regard to a seizure history is information regarding the patient’s AED regimen and adherence, and description of the event including duration, quantity, and character of the convulsions as well as any prodromal features (also known as an aura). Knowledge of what medications have con-trolled seizures before and what medications have failed may infl uence the selection of AEDs. Probing for social issues affecting medication adherence may reveal the

Table 2 Risk factors for status epilepticus by agea

Age, y≤35

>35

Contributing factorsBrain trauma, alcohol withdrawal, brain tumors,

and illicit drug use

Cerebrovascular disease, brain tumors, alcohol withdrawal, metabolic disorders such as ure-mia and electrolyte imbalances, neurodegener-ative diseases, and idiopathic causes

a Based on information from Bazil and Pedley.8

Toxic effects of drugs as well as some antiepileptic agents

Table 3 Drugs that can affect seizure thresholda

Psychiatric medications

Recreational drugs

Antibiotics

Other medications

Tricyclic antidepressantsBupropionVenlafaxine Citalopram Quetiapine

CocaineMDMA (ecstasy)

β-Lactam antibioticsCarbapenemsIsoniazid

Carbamazepine/oxcarbazepineDiphenhydramineFlumazenil (in benzodiazepine- dependent patients)

a Based on information from Thundiyil et al.20

64 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 64 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

necessity of choosing less expensive medications or counseling the patient or family on simple techniques for organizing medications for regular administration.

Assessment of PatientsInitial assessment should begin with a rapid evalua-

tion of airway, breathing, and circulation. Examination of patients with suspected seizures should include a thorough yet rapid visual assessment of motor activity of the face and extremities. The tonic-clonic extremity movements are obvious and are easily identifi ed by lay people. Patients with generalized NCSE may be critically ill and lethargic with or without subtle rhythmic move-ments. Subtle twitches may occur on any part of the body, may be unilateral or bilateral, and often involve the extraocular muscles or eyelids. NCSE patients with partial seizures may be less impaired: acting confused, aphasic, or staring, and they may show a lateral gaze preference contralateral to the focus of the seizure.1

ElectroencephalographyThe bedside nurse caring for a patient in status

epilepticus should have a basic knowledge of

electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns in order to determine when to call the neurologist to request an offi cial reading. Although it is clearly not the responsi-bility of the nurse to interpret an EEG, the nurse’s having a basic familiarity with typical EEG patterns and glancing at the bedside EEG monitor while caring for the patient may prompt additional attention by the neurologist and result in earlier identifi cation of seizures. Figures 1 through 3 are examples of typical normal and abnormal EEG fi ndings that may be encountered. A normal EEG shows lower amplitude and irregular frequencies (Figure 1). In NCSE, the amplitude is higher and the pattern is more regular with some similarities to the appearance of ventricular tachycardia on an electrocardiogram (Figure 2). During administration of anesthetic medications such as phenobarbital or propofol, a burst-suppressed pat-tern is found (Figure 3). Determining the desired fre-quency of the bursts (the sample EEG in Figure 3 shows 1 burst per page) is useful for anesthetic titration and communication with the prescriber.

Myoclonic muscle artifact reveals a disconcerting EEG pattern, and expert video EEG interpretation is required to discern between myoclonic artifact and

Figure 1 Normal electroencephalographic fi ndings.

www.ccnonline.org CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No 2, APRIL 2016 65

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 65 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

Figure 3 Electroencephalogram of patient during administration of anesthetic shows burst suppression.

Figure 2 Electroencephalogram of a patient with nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

66 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 66 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

status epilepticus. Use of a single dose of a paralytic agent to eliminate muscle artifact may be required. Timing of EEG application will be different from institu-tion to institution and is likely to vary depending on the resources available from the EEG staff. If radiologic eval-uation is also desired, special consideration should be given to the priority of these tests. Determination of the sequence of these diagnostic tests rests on both the clini-cal condition of the patient and the presumed underly-ing cause of the seizure. For example, for a patient with known brain cancer who had a witnessed onset of gener-alized convulsive status epilepticus and stopped con-vulsing after being given loading doses of lorazepam and fosphenytoin but has not returned to his baseline neurologic status, EEG most likely should be done before imaging as the patient is at high risk for NCSE. Another example is a patient with head trauma who had a seizure following an acute head injury but does not appear to have clinical seizure; in that case, a computed tomogra-phy scan of the head should be done to rule out bleeding that should be treated surgically.

In addition to electrographic monitoring, blood samples for laboratory tests should be collected soon after the patient arrives. All patients in status epilepti-cus should have blood glucose level measured, a com-plete blood cell count, and a comprehensive metabolic panel including measurement of calcium and magne-sium levels. Patients being treated for epilepsy should have AED levels measured if applicable. Depending on the patient’s history and clinical fi ndings, additional laboratory tests including a comprehensive toxicology panel, liver function tests, measurement of troponin levels, collection of blood samples to type and hold, arterial blood gas analysis, and lumbar puncture with measurement of protein and glucose levels, cell count, and culture should be considered.1

Except in cases with a clear cause, a radiologic workup to identify cranial abnormalities that may be causing an ictal focus should be undertaken. For example, a computed tomography scan may be obtained to rule out a traumatic hemorrhage and hemorrhagic stroke or magnetic resonance images may be obtained to rule out tumors or acute ischemic stroke.

Management of PatientsSeizures are a medical emergency; if they progress

to status epilepticus and are not rapidly treated,

permanent neuronal damage may occur within 24 hours.21,22 Both clinical and electrographic seizures should be emergently stopped.1 A prompt diagnosis should be followed by implementation of several thera-pies concurrently: critical care evaluation, emergency administration of an AED, and a search for the cause of the seizure. Initial management of status epilepticus is summarized in Table 4.

Airway, Breathing, and CirculationAs with all patient emergencies, all management

begins with evaluation of airway, breathing, and circula-tion. Generalized seizure activity impairs mental status and the ability to protect the airway, so the airway should be assessed concurrently with initial AED administration and should be serially reevaluated as therapy is escalated. Initial airway management may involve just provision of airway protection and supplemental oxygen delivery. Initial airway protection maneuvers consist of placing a

permanent neuronal damage may occur within 24

Table 4 Initial management of status epilepticusa

Priorities for the fi rst 0-5 min

Priorities for the fi rst 15 min

Priorities for the fi rst 15-60 min

Within fi rst 12-24 h

Evaluation/treatment of airway with noninvasive management

Check initial vital signs and telemetryObtain intravenous accessNeurological examinationFinger-stick blood glucoseAdministration of dextrose if

hypoglycemicAdministration of benzodiazepine

(fi rst-line antiepileptic drug)Fluid resuscitation if hypotensive

Intubation if airway or gas exchange is compromised

Second-line intravenous antiepileptic drug

Vasopressor support if hypotensiveCollect blood samples for laboratory

tests (complete blood cell count, Chem 7, calcium, magnesium, antiepileptic drug levels)

Electrocardiogram

Third-line antiepileptic drug for refractory status epilepticus

ElectroencephalographyComputed tomography of the headLumbar punctureAdditional laboratory tests (liver func-

tion tests, troponin levels, coagu-lation tests, arterial blood gases, comprehensive toxicology panel)

Magnetic resonance of the brain

a Adapted from the Neurocritical Care Society’s guidelines.1

www.ccnonline.org CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No 2, APRIL 2016 67

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 67 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

patient in a side-lying position and having suctioning equipment available as needed. Airway adjuncts such as a nasal trumpet may be needed, but insertion of a bite block device or oral airway should be avoided because they may induce vomiting or injure the patient’s teeth or mouth. However, after a large benzodiazepine dose or initiation of an anesthetic medication, decompensation may occur, prompting the need for artificial support.

Although noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is helpful in many circumstances, it is generally not safe or adequate in patients in status epilepticus because seizures are prolonged and pharmacological treatment options further depress neurologic function. The criteria for intubation according to the emergency neurologic life support protocol are failure to protect the airway, failure of ventilation or oxygenation, or an anticipated course of neurologic or cardiopulmonary decline.23 Because of the respiratory depressant effects of seizures and treatment agents, insertion of an endotracheal tube is warranted.1 Full ventilator support should be main-tained while status epilepticus remains a concern or if the patient remains on high doses of sedative or anesthetic medications. Although standard strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia should be implemented, continuous intravenous medications may be focused on stopping seizures and not on sedation.24 Therefore, med-ication titration goals should be clarified before cessation or titration of the infusions. Medication dosing may also preclude ventilator weaning because the medication may affect the patient’s ability to breathe independently.

Because of this, nurses caring for patients with status epilepticus

should clarify with the prescriber how medication and ventilator weaning should be handled to avoid inadvertently causing a patient to go back into status epilepticus.

Most AEDs can induce hypotension, so frequent monitoring of blood pressure is required. Peripheral intravenous catheters should emergently be placed for administration of intravenous AEDs, fluid boluses for hypotension, and other emergency drugs if required. Insertion of a central venous catheter should be consid-ered if status epilepticus is refractory and requires anes-thetic EEG burst suppression or if blood pressure is low and vasopressor support is required.

Antiepileptic DrugsThe goal of treatment is to rapidly stop status epilep-

ticus and prevent recurrence; thus, the most appropriate route of administration for AEDs is intravenous.1 Cur-rent guidelines for status epilepticus and the emergency neurologic life support protocol recommend parenteral benzodiazepines for emergent initial therapy.1,25

Intravenous lorazepam is preferred, but if intrave-nous access is not available, other benzodiazepines may be administered via alternative routes.1,26 Lorazepam has logistical issues in the prehospital setting (refrigeration requirements and shorter shelf-life), but intramuscular midazolam is at least as effective and is a safe alternative to intravenous lorazepam.27 An initial dose of 4 mg of lorazepam is recommended.1 Immediately following benzodiazepine administration, regardless of whether or not the patient has stopped convulsing, another AED should be administered to prevent rebound sei-zures as the benzodiazepine wears off.1 Therapeutic levels of a maintenance AED should be obtained urgently. Dosing of AEDs and special considerations are summa-rized in Table 5.

Several choices of medication are available for second- line AEDs. The most popular is fosphenytoin/phenyt-oin.23 Phenytoin is administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg at a rate not to exceed 50 mg/min. Fosphenytoin is a prodrug of phenytoin that has no pharmacological activity before its in vivo conversion to phenytoin. The half-life conversion to phenytoin is 8 to 15 minutes, and once converted, the phenytoin has 100% bioavailability. Fosphenytoin is dosed at 20-mg phenytoin equivalents per kilogram but can be administered at 150-mg phe-nytoin equivalents per minute, and because it is safe to administer 3 times faster and poses less risk of severe injury if extravasation occurs, fosphenytoin is typically preferred over phenytoin.1 Phenytoin and fosphenytoin may precipitate bradyarrythmias and hypotension when infused rapidly, so caution should be exercised, particularly when administering a loading dose.31 Intra-venous access, cardiac telemetry, and frequent monitor-ing of blood pressure are essential. Alternatives to fosphenytoin include valproate sodium 20 to 40 mg/kg intravenously, phenobarbital 20 mg/kg intravenously, levetiracetam 1 to 3 g intravenously, or continuous intra-venous infusion of midazolam.1 Others have suggested lacosamide at doses of 200 to 400 mg intravenously as an alternative second-line agent with the caveat that no

68 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Intravenous lorazepam is preferred; an initial dose of 4 mg of lorazepam is recommended for patients in status epilepticus.

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 68 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

Table 5 Medications for status epilepticusa

Abbreviations: GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate.a Adapted from the Neurocritical Care Society’s guidelines.1

Considerations

Short duration, active metabolite

Short duration, active metabolite, renal elimination

Cardiac monitoring for loading dose

Limited experience in status epilepticus

Cardiac monitoring during loading dose

No intravenous formulation available

Caution in patients with traumatic brain injury

Pregnancy category X

Requires mechanical ventilation

Tachyphylaxis may occurShort duration9

Requires mechanical ventilation

Half-life 15-60 h9,29

Lowers body temperature and theoretically is neuroprotective9

Requires mechanical ventilation

Serious adverse effects

Hypotension, respiratory depression

Hypotension, respiratory depression

Hypotension, respiratory depression

Hypotension, arrhythmias

PR prolongation, hypotension

Hypotension, respiratory depression

Arrhythmias, hypotension, purple glove syndrome with extravasation (rare)28

Metabolic acidosis

Hyperammonemia, pancreatitis, thrombocy-topenia, hepatotoxicity

Respiratory depression, hypotension

Hypotension, respiratory depression, cardiac depression, paralytic ileus, loss of neuronal function at high doses

Hypotension, respiratory depression, cardiac failure, rhabdomyolysis, metabolic acidosis, propofol-related infusion syndrome9,30

Dosing

0.15 mg/kg intravenously up to 10 mg, repeat in 5 min

0.2 mg/kg rectally up to maximum of 30 mg

Alternate 0.2 mg/kg rectally

0.1 mg/kg intravenously up to 4 mg, repeat in 5-10 min

0.2 mg/kg intramuscularly up to 10 mg

20-mg phenytoin equivalent/kg intravenously, may rebolus with 5-mg phenytoin equivalent/kg 10 min after initial loading dose

200-400 mg intravenously

1000-3000 mg intravenously

20 mg/kg, may give additional 5-10 mg/kg 10 min after initial loading dose

20 mg/kg, may give additional 5-10 mg/kg 10 min after initial loading dose

200-400 mg via naso gastric tube or by mouth, 300-1600 mg/d divided into 2-4 doses

20-40 mg/kg intravenously, may repeat

0.05-2 mg/kg per h, bolus 0.1-0.2 mg/kg and increase rate every 3-4 h

5-15 mg/kg loading dose followed by infusion at 0.5-5 mg/kg per h

Start at 20 µg/kg per min, titrate up to 50 µg/kg per min

Administration rate

Up to 5 mg/min

Up to 2 mg/min

Up to 150-mg phenytoin equivalent/min

200 mg per 15 min

2-5 mg/kg per min intravenously

50-100 mg/min intravenously

Up to 50 mg/min intravenously

3-6 mg/kg per min

Drug/category/ mechanism Intermittently dosed medications

Diazepam

Lorazepam

Midazolam

Fosphenytoin

Lacosamide

Levetiracetam

Phenobarbital

Phenytoin

Topiramate

Valproate sodium

Refractory/continuous medications

MidazolamWater-soluble benzodiazepineGABAA enhancement

PentobarbitalBarbiturateGABAA enhancement

PropofolHypnotic sedativeActivation of GABA receptors, inhibition of NMDA receptors, and modulation of calcium infl ux

www.ccnonline.org CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No 2, APRIL 2016 69

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 69 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

data from randomized controlled trials are available to support this decision because the newer AEDs were not included in older trials.29,32

If the patient progresses to refractory status epilepti-cus, urgent escalation of therapy should be continued. At this point, options include administering another bolus of the same second-line agent that had been given or adding another agent from the ones just discussed. Limited evidence supports expanding the list of appro-priate AEDs to include topiramate 200 to 400 mg via nasogastric tube or by mouth.33 If the status epilepticus remains refractory, induction of anesthesia with contin-uous intravenous medications is often required. Typical agents include propofol 20 to 200 µg/kg per minute, pentobarbital as a 5- to 15-mg bolus followed by 0.5 to 5 mg/kg per hour, and the aforementioned midazolam as a 0.2-mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion at 0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg per hour.1,34 Reevaluation after each of these steps must occur frequently, and subsequent escalation of treatment must be rapid and aggressive to avoid per-manent neuronal damage. No data support use of one of these agents over the others.7

The most notorious side effect of pentobarbital, midazolam, and propofol infusions is hemodynamic suppression, which warrants close monitoring of vital signs.27 Before giving a patient a loading dose of pheny-toin or fosphenytoin, telemetry should be applied because

the drug may precipitate bradyarrhyth-mias, includ-ing high-grade

atrioventricular block, asystole, and death.31 Nurses should anticipate vasopressor use if an anesthetic medication is infusing continuously because anesthetics often cause hypotension. Vasopressor selection should be individualized to each patient’s hemodynamic profile and desired effect.

Although data indicate that intravenous anesthetic drugs such as propofol, midazolam, and high-dose bar-biturates have a potent antiepileptic effect, these patients with super-refractory status epilepticus have high morbidity and mortality.35-38 In a recent study,38 researchers found higher rates of infection and death in patients receiving anesthetic agents, even when corrected for critical med-ical conditions and for the refractoriness of the status epi-lepticus. It remains unclear whether the anesthetic agents themselves or a selection bias led to this worsened mortality.

These medications have considerable side effect profiles that require vigilance to avoid increased morbid-ity and mortality.39 Pentobarbital is known to cause immunosuppression and gastric paresis and is associated with elevated rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and ileus.37,39

Propofol has a rapid onset and short duration and is often considered a favorite first-line anesthetic for refractory status epilepticus because of its favorable properties of rapid onset and recovery and no serious drug-drug interactions.7,30 The most severe side effect is a rare condition known as propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS), typically associated with doses greater than 4 mg/kg per hour for longer than 48 hours, as is characteristic of the usage patterns in status epilepticus. Early findings include hyperlipidemia, acidosis, and ele-vated creatine kinase levels. Serial daily measurements of arterial blood gases, serum level of creatine kinase, and triglycerides can be used to screen for early signs of PRIS.30 If unrecognized and untreated, PRIS may result in rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, hypotension, metabolic acidosis, hyperthermia, cardiac dysfunction, and ulti-mately death.40

Midazolam has a strong antiepileptic action and a short duration, and like the others, it is a respiratory and cardiac depressant. The primary disadvantage is tachyphylaxis, which is a rapidly decreasing therapeutic effect following initial administration, which may allow breakthrough seizures as soon as 1 day after therapy is started.1,7,41

The barbiturate pentobarbital is the traditional anes-thetic medication used for patients in status epilepticus. Some advantages of pentobarbital are its strong antiepi-leptic action as well as its tendency to lower core tem-perature.7 Mild hypothermia has a neuroprotective effect in status epilepticus.42 Pentobarbital causes more potent hypotension and cardiorespiratory depression, and pres-sors are typically required.41 Gastric paresis, immuno-suppression, pneumonia, and splanchnic hypoperfusion leading to gastric, pancreatic, and hepatic complications are more common with barbiturates.39,43,44 The pharma-cokinetics of pentobarbital will typically cause a per-sistent anesthetic effect for several days following discontinuation.7 Duration of anesthesia before initial attempts to wean a patient off of any of these anesthetic agents is customarily 24 to 48 hours, but few data are available to support this. Maintenance AEDs should be continued during anesthesia and throughout weaning.1

70 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Phenytoin and fosphenytoin often cause hypotension during the administration of loading doses.

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 70 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

Although multiple anesthetic medications exist, no randomized controlled trials with adequate power have been done to compare agents. In a meta-analysis45 of 121 studies including 1168 patients, the researchers were able to draw only broad conclusions and did not recommend one agent as better than another (it may vary from patient to patient). The Neurocritical Care Society’s guidelines1 do not recommend one anesthetic agent over another, citing limited evidence from less rigorous studies.

Dosing regimens must be adjusted on the basis of the patient and the EEG response. In refractory status epilepticus, the continuous EEG is the primary tool for determining anesthetic dose.46 Patients who are sedated to the point of burst suppression will often exhibit loss of all brainstem reflexes and appear to have palsy of cranial nerve III with dilated unresponsive pupils. There-fore the need for brain monitoring devices to continually assess patients at risk for herniation should be considered so that unnecessary imaging is not prompted by this examination, which would otherwise be very concerning.

Nursing ConsiderationsGastrointestinal

The anesthetics, particularly barbiturates, can cause gastric paresis and ileus.39 Postpyloric nutrition in a patient with delayed gastric emptying and a suppressed cough reflex may be a logical approach. Additionally, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses practice alert47 on prevention of aspiration recommends elevat-ing the head of the bed to 30º to 45º. Should an ileus occur, a nasogastric tube may be required for gastric decompression to prevent aspiration. Tube feedings administered at a slow rate can promote the health of gastrointestinal membranes to prevent the translocation of organisms across the gastric cell membrane while also minimizing the potential of tube feeding intolerance.48

DermatologicDuring prolonged EEG monitoring, skin beneath the

leads may break down. The scalp should be assessed carefully. A lead holiday in which the EEG monitoring is suspended after a stable medication regimen is estab-lished but before weaning off of pentobarbital may be appropriate in some cases. Alternative types of skin preparation and conductive paste may be requested to minimize breakdown, particularly if the patient has a

skin allergy to a specific product.49 After extravasation of phenytoin, purple glove syndrome may develop; this syndrome may be treated with dry heat and elevation, but the patient should be monitored for tissue sloughing or compartment syndrome.28 Another dermatologic situation that may affect the patient is development of a rash. Certain medications such as phenytoin, carba-mazepine, and lamotrigine may cause Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis.50,51 Although rare, if one of those disorders is ignored and the medication continues to be adminis-tered, either Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epider-mal necrolysis can evolve into a life-threatening situation.

NeurologicDaily interruption of sedation, although once a

popular strategy to reduce oversedation and prolonged mechanical ventilation, does not reduce ventilator days or ICU length of stay,52 but in a Cochrane review,53 this practice was equivocal. The typical practice in patients with refractory status epilepticus is titrating anesthetics to burst suppression and maintaining this for 36 to 48 hours before weaning.54 It may be appropriate to perform abbreviated neurologic examinations during deep seda-tion or anesthesia. In situations where brain death is suspected, the brain death guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology suggest that sedative medications must be withheld for at least 5 half-lives, assuming normal hepatic and renal function, or until drug levels are unde-tectable before the brain death examination is performed.54

Patients with status epilepticus should be kept nor-mothermic. Those receiving continuous anesthetic medications have a tendency to be hypothermic, espe-cially those receiving pentobarbital. Warm air blankets can be used to gently rewarm or maintain normother-mia. Intravascular techniques are not often necessary.

Summary and ConclusionsStatus epilepticus is a medical emergency that

requires emergent identification and treatment and urgent follow-up therapies to prevent neuronal death. Although convulsive status epilepticus is obvious, non-convulsive status epilepticus is less apparent. Whether convulsive or nonconvulsive in nature, emergent treat-ment for status epilepticus should begin with manage-ment of airway, breathing, and circulation followed by

Patients in a barbiturate coma are prone to ileus.

www.ccnonline.org CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No 2, APRIL 2016 71

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 71 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

benzodiazepines, urgent follow-up administration of intravenous AEDs, and rapid escalation of therapy, often to general anesthesia, to prevent morbidity and mortal-ity. As with the evolving definition of status epilepticus over the years, ongoing rigorous research is needed to increase knowledge about the drug selection priorities and further development of our understanding of how the GABA-mediated inhibition fails in refractory status epilepticus.1,12 Knowing what to look for in this popula-tion of patients, nurses are uniquely positioned to assist with the identification and management of status epilep-ticus to minimize the untoward and intractable sequela of the natural course of the disease. CCN

Financial DisclosuresNone reported.

References1. Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and

management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):3-23.2. Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino G, et al. Mortality after a first

episode of status epilepticus in the United States and Europe. Epilepsia. 2005;46(suppl 11):46-48.

3. Rosenow F, Hamer HM, Knake S. The epidemiology of convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2007;48(suppl 8):82-84.

4. Dham BS, Hunter K, Rincon F. The epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:476-483.

5. Bhalla D, Tchall AE, Mignard C, et al. First-ever population-based study on status epilepticus in French Island of La Reunion (France): incidence and fatality. Seizure. 2014;23:769-773.

6. Rona S, Rosenow F, Arnold S, et al. A semiological classification of status epilepticus. Epileptic Disord. 2005;7(1):5-12.

7. Shorvon S, Ferlisi M. The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 10):2802-2818.

8. Bazil CW, Pedley TA. Epilepsy. In: Rowland LP, Pedley TA, eds. Merritt’s Neurology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:927-947.

9. Hickey JV, ed. The Clinical Practice of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nurs-ing. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

10. Huff JS, Fountain NB. Pathophysiology and definitions of seizures and status epilepticus. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011;29(1):1-13.

11. Naylor DE, Liu H, Wasterlain CG. Trafficking of GABAA receptors, loss of inhibition, and a mechanism for pharmocoresistance in status epilep-ticus. J Neurosci. 2005;25(34):7724-7733.

12. Ingvar M. Cerebral blood flow and metabolic rate during seizures rela-tionship to epileptic brain damage. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;462:194-206.

13. Sibson NR, Dhankhar AD, Mason GF, Rothman DL, Behar KL, Shul-man RG. Stoichiometric coupling of brain glucose metabolism and glutamatergic neuronal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:316-321.

14. Kreisman NR, Sick TJ, Rosenthal M. Concepts of brain oxygenation sufficiency during seizures. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1984;180:381-392.

15. Meldrum BS, Horton RW. Physiology of status epilepticus in primates. Arch Neurol. 1973;28(1):1-9.

16. Fujikawa DG. Prolonger seizures and cellular injury: understanding the connection. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;7:S3-S11.

17. Holmes GL. Seizure-induced neuronal injury: animal data. Neurology. 2002;59(9 suppl 5):S3-S6.

18. Connolly NM, Prehn JH. The metabolic response to excitotoxicity: lesion from single-cell imaging. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2015;47(1-2):75-88.

19. Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, et al. A practical clinical defini-tion of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014;55(4):475-482.

20. Thundiyil JG, Rowley F, Papa L, Olson KR, Kearney TE. Risk factors for complications of drug-induced seizures. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7:16-23.

21. Niquet J, Lopez-Meraz ML, Wasterlain CG. Programmed necrosis after status epilepticus. In: Noebels JL, Avoli M, Rogawski MA, et al, eds. Jasper’s Basic Mechanism of the Epilepsies. 4th ed. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2012.

22. Men S, Lee DH, Barron JR, Munoz DG. Selective neuronal necrosis associated with status epilepticus: MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21: 1837-1840.

23. Sedar DB, Riker RR, Jagoda A, Smith WS, Weingart SD. Emergency neurologic life support: airway, ventilation, and sedation. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:S4-S20.

24. Mietto c, Pinciroli R, Patel N, Berra L. Ventilator associated pneumonia: evolving definitions and preventive strategies. Respir Care. 2013; 58(6): 990-1007.

25. Claassen J, Silbergleit R, Weingart SD, Smith WS. Emergency neuro-logic life support: status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:S73-S78.

26. Prasad M, Krishnan PR, Sequeira R, Al-Roomi K. Anticonvulsant ther-apy for status epilepticus (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9: CD003723.

27. Silbergleit R, Durkalski V, Lowenstein D, et al for the NETT Investigators. Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilep-ticus. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(7):591-600.

28. Garbovsky LA, Drumheller BC, Perrone J. Purple glove syndrome after phenytoin or fosphenytoin administration: review of reported cases and recommendations for prevention. J Med Toxicol. 2015;11(4):445-459.

29. Trinka E. What is the evidence to use new intravenous AEDs in status epilepticus? Epilepsia. 2011;52(suppl 8):35-38.

30. Diedrich DA, Brown DR. Propofol infusion syndrome in the ICU. Analytic Rev. 2011;26(2):59-72.

31. Adams BD, Buckley NH, Kim JY, Tipps LB. Fosphenytoin may cause hemodynamically unstable bradydysrhythmias. J Emerg Med. 2006; 30(1): 75-79.

32. Zelano J, Kumlien E. Levetiracetam as alternate stage two antiepileptic drug in status epilepticus: a systematic review. Seizure. 2012;21:233-236.

33. Hottinger A, Sutter R, Marsch S, Rüegg S. Topiramate as an adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory status epilepticus: an observational cohort study. CNS Drugs. 2012;26(9):761-772.

34. Fernandez A, Lantigua H, Lesch C, et al. High-dose midazolam infusion for refractory status epilepticus. Neurology. 2014;82(4):359-365.

35. Alvarez V, Januel JM, Burnand B, Rossetti AO. Role of comorbidities in outcome prediction after status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2012; 53(5): e89-e92.

36. Sutter R, Marsch S, Fuhr P, Ruegg S. Mortality and recovery from refrac-tory status epilepticus in the intensive care unit: a 7-year observational study. Epilepsia. 2013;54(3):502-511.

37. Pugin D, Foreman B, De Marchis GM, et al. Is pentobarbital safe and efficacious in the treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R103.

38. Sutter R, Marsch S, Fuhr P, Kaplan PW, Ruegg S. Anesthetic drugs in status epilepticus: risk or rescue? A 6-year cohort study. Neurology. 2014; 82:656-664.

39. Smith M. Anesthetic agents and status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2011; 52(suppl 8): 42-44.

40. Roberts RJ, Barletta JF, Fong JJ, et al. Incidence of propofol-related infu-sion syndrome in critically ill adults: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care. 2009;13(5): R169.

41. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Emerson RG, Mayer SA. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a sys-tematic review. Epilepsia. 2002;43(2):146-153.

42. Yu L, Zhou Y, Wang Y. Effect of mild hypothermia on glutamate recep-tor expression after status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res. 2012;101:56-69.

43. Formeister JF, MacDermott RP, Wickline D, et al. Alteration of lympho-cyte function due to anesthesia: in vivo and in vitro suppression of mitogen-induced blastogenesis by sodium pentobarbital. Surgery. 1980; 87(5): 573-580.

44. Tian J, Chau C, Hales TG, Kaufman DL. GABAA receptors mediate inhibition of T cell responses. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;96:21-28.

45. Shorvon S, Ferlisi M. The outcome of therapies in refractory and

Now that you’ve read the article, create or contribute to an online discussion about this topic using eLetters. Just visit www.ccnonline.org and select the article you want to comment on. In the full-text or PDF view of the article, click “Responses” in the middle column and then “Submit a response.”

d tmoreTo learn more about neurology/neurosurgery, read “Embrace Hope: An End-of-Life Intervention to Support Neurological Critical Care Patients and Their Families” by Yeager et al in Critical Care Nurse, February 2010;30:47-58. Available at www.ccnonline.org.

72 CriticalCareNurse Vol 36, No. 2, APRIL 2016 www.ccnonline.org

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 72 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

super- refractory convulsive status epilepticus and recommendations for therapy. Brain. 2012;135:2314-2328.

46. Kennedy JD, Gerard EE. Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12:419-428.

47. Bell L. AACN practice alert: Prevention of aspiration. 2011. http://www.aacn.org/wd/practice/docs/practicealerts/prevention-aspiration- practice - alert.pdf?menu=aboutus. Accessed January 13, 2015.

48. Eizaguirre I, Garcia-Urkia N, Asensio AB, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis and bacterial translocation: role of minimal enteral nutrition. Cir Pediatr.2006;19(3):163-166.

49. Jarrar R, Buchhalter J, Williams K, McKay M, Luketich C. Technical tips: electrode safety in pediatric prolonged EEG recordings. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2011;51:114-117.

50. Locharernkul C, Loplumlert J, Limotai C, et al. Carbamazepine and phenytoin induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome is associated with HLA-B*1502 allele in Thai population. Epilepsia. 2008;49(12):2087-2091.

51. Li X, Yu K, Mei S, et al. HLA-B*1502 increases the risk of phenytoin or lamotrigine induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: evidence from a meta-analysis of nine case-control studies. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2015;65(2):107-111.

52. Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, et al for the SLEAP Investigators. Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(19):1985-1992.

53. Burry L, Rose L, McCullagh IJ, Fergusson DA, Ferguson ND, Mehta S. Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD009176.

54. Rossetti AO, Milligan TA, Vulliemoz S, Michaelides C, Bertschi M, Lee JQ.A randomized trial for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14(1):4-10.

55. Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults—report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1911-1918.

www.ccnonline.org

Lawson4_16pgs.indd 73 3/10/16 12:30 PM by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from

Thomas Lawson and Susan Yeager in Adults: A Review of Diagnosis and TreatmentStatus Epilepticus

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Published online ©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses

10.4037/ccn2016892 62-73 36 2016;Crit Care Nurse

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?link_type=PERMISSIONDIRECTPersonal use only. For copyright permission information:

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/Subscription Information

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/misc/ifora.xhtmlInformation for authors

http://www.editorialmanager.com/ccn Submit a manuscript

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/etoc.xhtmlEmail alerts

AACN. All rights reserved. AACN, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Telephone: (800) 899-1712, (949) 362-2050, ext. 532. Fax: (949) 362-2049. Copyright ©2016 by Critical Care Nurse is an official peer-reviewed journal of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) published bimonthly by

by AACN on August 11, 2018http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from