state/epa environmental information exchange network – progress report
DESCRIPTION
State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network – Progress Report Presented by Melanie Morris, Network Steering Board Member February 28, 2004. CY 2004 Performance Measures. Focus on both building infrastructure and exchanging data Goal – Create critical mass by end of 2004 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange
Network – Progress Report
Presented by Melanie Morris, Network Steering Board Member
February 28, 2004
2
CY 2004 Performance Measures
• Focus on both building infrastructure and exchanging data
• Goal – Create critical mass by end of 2004
• 3 Measures with Specific Targets
3
Success is defined as data flowing through to destination systems with no diminution of service.
Targets by FlowFlow Type Target No. Of States
Flowing in CY04
FRS 20
PCS/IDEF 10
NEI 12
Beaches 7
RCRAInfo 10
SDWIS 10
Performance Goal 1
4
Performance Goal 2
Success is defined as States that are capable of multiple flows (two or more) to partners.
Target: 10-14 States doing multiple flows by end of 2004
5
Performance Goal 3
Success is defined as having the technical architecture in place by having partners establish fully functional Nodes.
Target: 35 Nodes by the end of 2004
6
HOW DID WE DO???
7
Performance Goal 1 Targets
Type Schema/EPA Can Receive and Process
Goal Progress
FRS Yes/Yes 20 25
Beaches Yes/Yes* 7 3
NEI Yes/Yes 12 6*
PCS/IDEF Yes/Yes** 10 2
RCRAInfo Yes/Yes*** 10 3
SDWIS Yes/Yes**** 10 3
Summary:Exceeded FRS (new data to EPA)Lots of states ready for NEI in Spring 05RCRAInfo and SDWIS – not available until end of CY2004The only one that got easier was FRS
*Only 1 of 2 modules can be processed by EPA** PCS/IDEF is “scheduled” not available to all*** Only RCRAInfo Handler can be processed by EPA****Available in December 2004
8
Performance Goal 2: States with Multiple Flows• Met goal with 10 states with more than 1
data flow– OR: FRS, PNNWQX, NEI, Hazardous
Waste Transporters (4) with RCRA Handler coming soon!
– WA: FRS, PNNWQX, Hazardous Waste Transporters, Fish Tissue with DOH (4)
– NJ: Beaches, FRS, NEI (3) with SDWIS coming soon
– DE: Beaches, NEI, and PCS/IDEF (3)– NH: Beaches, RCRAInfo Handler, FRS (3)
9
Performance Goal 2: States with Multiple Flows (cont’d)• Met goal with 10 states with more than 1
data flow (cont’d)– NY: FRS, SDWIS– MI: DMR, TRI– ME: SDWIS, FRS– MD: SDWIS, FRS– MS: FRS, RCRAInfo Handler
10
Status of Network NodesDecember 31, 2004 – 31 Operational
CA
OR
WA
ID
MT
WY
CO
NM
TX
AK
HI
OK
KS
SD
ND
MN
IA
WI
IN OH
KY
TN
MS AL GA
FL
NC
WV
PA
NY
DE
CT
NH
RI
IL
MO
AR
LA
NVUT
AZ
OR
NM
MS
WV
PANJ
MA
NH
MDDC
VA
MI
NM SC
NE
VT ME
FLIn Development
Operational
Not Yet Started
11
Other things to Report
• Reusable tools and software code developed and shared….– Some demonstrated Node Configurations being
downloaded and installed in 1 day.– States developed sharable XML Style sheets to convert
drinking water lab data to SDWIS– States developed sharable Beach Monitoring web tools –
Great Lakes States going to adopt
• Looking at numbers:– Thousands of new FRS records at EPA (according to Pat)
• New Partners:– States environmental agencies exchanging data for the
first time– States giving access to their data to other State
Departments (one gave a copy of their Node Client for the other department to use to do a Query off their Node)
12
Year End Reflections
• We fell short on the State to EPA data flows but we learned these were harder throughout the year
• New data flows we weren’t expecting– Hazardous waste transporters across states– DEP/DEQ and DOH exchanges
• If we make the tools (schema, and NFC) and rules available..the Network works– Proven by states being able to do flows quickly when
these tools and Nodes are in place
• Success in reaching ultimate goal of obtaining critical mass on the Exchange Network.
• End of the year (last 2 months) momentum was great…states just didn’t get Nodes up but they started doing multiple flows.
13
February 2005 Update
• Nodes• Flows
14
CA
OR
WA
ID
MT
WY
CO
NM
TX
AK
HI
OK
KS
SD
ND
MN
IA
WI
IN OH
KY
TN
MS AL GA
FL
NC
WV
PA
NY
DE
CT
NH
RI
IL
MO
AR
LA
NVUT
AZ
OR
NM
MS
WV
PANJ
MA
NH
MD
Status of State Nodes - February 15, 2005
DCVA
MI
NM SC
NE
VT ME
FLIn Development
Operational
Not Yet Started
15
OR
OR
WA
WA
DE
WV
WV MI
MI
WI
WI MS
MS SC
SC NH
NH
NH
KS
KS
NE
NE
WA
WA
OR
OR
ID
MS MA
DE
DE OR PA NHKY
MS ORDE NJ
NJ
NJ GA CA NC
OH
OH
NH
AK
ME VT RI
AZ
AZ
CA
CA CO
CO
DE
DE
ID
ID
IL
IL IN
IN LA ME MD MA
MI
MN
MO
NE
NJ
NM
NM NYOK
PA
TX UT VT
PA NJ
VA IA
MT VA WYKY NCGALast Update Feb 17, 2005
MO
VA IN SC MI
eDMR MI WI
NC
SDND
ND SD
IA
IA NY
COLOR KEYIn DevelopmentOperational
MD
NYME
AKNV
LA
MA
UT
TX NJ
ME
MD
MNMT
WA WV
IL NE
FL
VA
AL
CT
CTAL
MS
WA
Development is in process
Development is in processNM
Handler Module in Production Only