stabilization and restoration of owens dry lake california

32
Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California Jim Jordahl, Ph.D. USEPA International Phytotechnologies Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 22, 2005

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Jim Jordahl, Ph.D.USEPA International Phytotechnologies Conference

Atlanta, GeorgiaApril 22, 2005

Page 2: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Acknowledgements

• John Dickey, Maurice Hall, Mark Madison, Jason Smesrud, Quitterie Cotten, Mica Heilman, Greg Roland, Richard Coles, Kevin Burton (CH2M HILL)

• Margot Griswold (Earthworks)• Richard Harasick, Thayne DeVorss, and

Ray Prittie (Los Angeles Department of Water and Power)

Page 3: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Outline• Project location and history• Agronomic and engineering challenges• Dust control measure description and

implementation

Page 4: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Project LocationIntroduction

• Photo/map that shows location andsize of project

• CH and LADWP logos

Page 5: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Owens Lake, c. 1900

Page 6: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Owens Lake History• 1850’s to 1908: Owens Valley water developed for irrigated

agriculture reducing inflow to the lake• 1913: Los Angeles Aqueduct begins export of Owens River

flow to Los Angeles nearly eliminating inflow• 1930: Much of 110 sq. mi. (28,490 ha) lakebed area exposed• 1972: Clean Air Act• 1980: Owens Dust problem linked to LA water exports• 1997: MOA between LA and GBUAPCD establishes time

frame for dust control• 2001: First 10 sq. mi. (2,590 ha) of dust mitigation operated• Today: 19 sq. mi. (4,920 ha) constructed, 10 sq. mi. (2,590

ha) more by 2006

Page 7: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Owens Lake, CA

Page 8: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California
Page 9: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Owens Lake - An Environmental Problem of Epic Proportion

•110 square miles of dusty, saline, desert lakebed•Single largest source of PM10 in the U.S.•A very aggressive timeline for a solution

Page 10: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Salt crust covers the Playa from 50-100 years of saline shallow groundwater evaporation

Page 11: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Reduced, cracking, clay subsoil

Spring salt bloom on lakebed

Page 12: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Environmental Challenges

• High desert– ETo = 62.1– precipitation = 5.4 (inches/year)– Hot summers, frozen winters

• Shallow groundwater (4X seawater)• Soils (avg. 160 dS/m)• Winds and mobile sand• Sensitive shorebird spp.• Large stormwater flows

Page 13: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Railroad ties Railroad ties after years after years

on the playaon the playa

Challenges of working on Challenges of working on a a ““drydry”” lakebedlakebed

Extreme weathering and Extreme weathering and intensively corrosive intensively corrosive

environmentenvironment

Page 14: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Los Angeles Aqueduct

Page 15: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California
Page 16: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

MV control mechanism:• Stabilizes and protects land

surface• Slows surface wind

velocity• Ties up mobile sand

MV specifications:• Saltgrass (Distichlis

spicata) stands• 50% of each acre covered

in vegetation (live or dead)

MV control mechanism:• Stabilizes and protects land

surface• Slows surface wind

velocity• Ties up mobile sand

MV specifications:• Saltgrass (Distichlis

spicata) stands• 50% of each acre covered

in vegetation (live or dead)

MV pluses:• 1 to 2.5 feet of water/year• Stable once established• Less ancillary habitat than SF

MV challenges:• Extreme environment requires cutting

edge farming, increases risk• Soils and Groundwater

– Extreme chemistry– Waterlogging, cementation– Requires saltwater recycling

• Planting material not readily available

• Higher capital costs– Drainage and recycling– Saltgrass propagation

• Construction in difficult areas

MV pluses:• 1 to 2.5 feet of water/year• Stable once established• Less ancillary habitat than SF

MV challenges:• Extreme environment requires cutting

edge farming, increases risk• Soils and Groundwater

– Extreme chemistry– Waterlogging, cementation– Requires saltwater recycling

• Planting material not readily available

• Higher capital costs– Drainage and recycling– Saltgrass propagation

• Construction in difficult areas

Page 17: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Subsurface drip irrigation network

Why subsurface?• More efficient water use • Minimizes drainage loads • Less prone to damage and displacement from

thermal expansion, roaming cattle, vertebrate pests, sunshine, wind, and stormwater

• Stable temperature reduces scaling and associated plugging risk

• Mobile sand on the Playa will result in portions becoming buried anyway

• Mechanized transplanting is feasible.

Page 18: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Subsurface Drip Irrigated Saltgrass (Distichlis spicata)

Page 19: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Tillage and planting profile

Drip tubing

Transplant

Bed surfaceReclaimed zone

Depth of tillage

Fertilizer placement

Pre-plant roto-tillage

5 feet

Page 20: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Aqueduct

Saltwater

Shallow groundwater

MV SF* Ponds

Drains

Mix

* Habitat SF areas can be served with fresher water also.

Drainwaterand Tailwater

recyclingIrrigation (ETc +

leaching)

Irrigation Storage and

recovery

PercolationSeepage

Inflow

Irrigation (ET)

Page 21: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Drainwater Reuse Drivers• Economic: LAA water value is at a

premium (approximately $7M to $24M per year in water cost)

• Soil Management: LAA water is not saline enough to prevent soil dispersion and structural collapse of the highly sodic lakebed soils

• Regulatory: The project is permitted with zero-discharge requirements

Page 22: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Drainwater Collection and Reuse System

• Subsurface drainwater collected from managed vegetation fields is pumped into a dedicated drainwater conveyance system

• Freshwater and saline drainwater are blended to an EC of 9 dS/m at irrigation turnouts

• Excess saline drainwater is directed to shallow flooding dust control areas

Page 23: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Blended Drip Irrigation Water Quality Objectives

• Sand media filtration / secondary screen• Adjust water chemistry to avoid emitter

plugging by biological growth, mineral precipitation, or root intrusion– Phosphonate scaling inhibitor– Trifluralin– NaOCl – NaBr

• Fertilization (fertigation)

Page 24: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Water Treatment and Fertigation

Page 25: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California
Page 26: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California
Page 27: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Saltgrass After Establishment

Page 28: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Vegetated Playa Surface

Page 29: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California
Page 30: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Vegetation in row exceeds 50% cover quickly

Page 31: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Conclusions• Reuse of very saline water in an extreme

environment is possible with the appropriate consideration of:– soil and crop upper and lower salinity limits– irrigation water quality management in the

conveyance system– corrosion control of irrigation and drainage

equipment

Page 32: Stabilization and Restoration of Owens Dry Lake California

Conclusions• Shallow flooding areas nearly 100%

compliant, covering about 15.7 square miles• 1,173 acres (49%) of the saltgrass area was

compliant (50% cover) after 2 growing seasons

• Compliance calculations originally ignored strips of compliant vegetation in rows, taking an area average

• 2,240 acre site (saltgrass) contributed little dust to storms in that region of the lakebed