staar end-of-course (eoc) assessments

38
End-of-Course Assessments 2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.1 STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments Program Overview Refer to the table in the General Information section that includes the assessments available for the EOC program. STAAR EOC The STAAR EOC assessments measure students’ academic performance in core high school courses (Algebra I, English I, English II, Biology, U.S. History). These assessments became part of the graduation requirements beginning with the freshman class of 2011–2012. Algebra II and English III will be available in spring 2021 for districts to administer as optional assessments. Students are required to take the STAAR EOC assessments for courses in which they’re enrolled as part of their graduation requirements. Paper and online administrations are available for the STAAR EOC assessments. STAAR with Embedded Supports Embedded supports (e.g., text-to-speech and content and language supports) are available on STAAR assessments for eligible students as individual embedded online accommodations. Paper administrations with embedded supports are also available for eligible students requiring a paper administration of STAAR. Paper administrations with embedded supports require approval of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and contain only some of the supports available in the online assessments with embedded supports. The Speech-To-Text (STT) tool is available online for students who meet the eligibility criteria for Basic Transcribing or Spelling Assistance, AND for whom Speech-To-Text is the most appropriate method of delivery for these supports. Only available for tests with a composition open entry response box (grades 4 & 7 writing, and English I, English II, and English III, and grade 4 Spanish writing). STAAR Refreshable Braille Online screen reader support for refreshable braille displays is available for eligible students as an individual online accommodation. STAAR American Sign Language Video American Sign Language videos are available online for eligible students as individual embedded online accommodations.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Mar-2022

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.1

STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments

Program OverviewRefer to the table in the General Information section that includes the assessments available for the EOC program.

STAAR EOCThe STAAR EOC assessments measure students’ academic performance in core high school courses (Algebra I, English I, English II, Biology, U.S. History). These assessments became part of the graduation requirements beginning with the freshman class of 2011–2012. Algebra II and English III will be available in spring 2021 for districts to administer as optional assessments.

Students are required to take the STAAR EOC assessments for courses in which they’re enrolled as part of their graduation requirements.

Paper and online administrations are available for the STAAR EOC assessments.

STAAR with Embedded SupportsEmbedded supports (e.g., text-to-speech and content and language supports) are available on STAAR assessments for eligible students as individual embedded online accommodations. Paper administrations with embedded supports are also available for eligible students requiring a paper administration of STAAR. Paper administrations with embedded supports require approval of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and contain only some of the supports available in the online assessments with embedded supports.

The Speech-To-Text (STT) tool is available online for students who meet the eligibility criteria for Basic Transcribing or Spelling Assistance, AND for whom Speech-To-Text is the most appropriate method of delivery for these supports.

Only available for tests with a composition open entry response box (grades 4 & 7 writing, and English I, English II, and English III, and grade 4 Spanish writing).

STAAR Refreshable BrailleOnline screen reader support for refreshable braille displays is available for eligible students as an individual online accommodation.

STAAR American Sign Language VideoAmerican Sign Language videos are available online for eligible students as individual embedded online accommodations.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.2

Assessment ScoresThe following gives a brief description of the scores provided for the STAAR EOC assessments. For more detailed technical information about assessment scores, refer to the Technical Digest, available on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

Raw ScoreThe raw score is the number of items answered correctly on an assessment. By itself, the raw score has limited utility; it can be interpreted only in reference to the total number of items on a subject-area assessment, and raw scores should not be compared across administrations.

The raw score is reported by overall assessment and by reporting category.

Scale ScoreThe scale score is used for all STAAR EOC assessments. Refer to the table in the General Information section that includes the assessments available for the EOC program.

The scale score is a statistic that allows a comparison of scores by adjusting for variations in the difficulty of the forms used in different administrations. Thus, the scale score can be used to determine whether a student achieved Approaches, Meets, or Masters Grade Level performance, to compare one student to another taking the same assessment, and to compare cohorts of students taking the same assessment in different years. However, the scale score cannot be used to evaluate a student’s progress across grades or courses.

Performance StandardsThe following gives a brief description of the performance levels used on the STAAR EOC assessments.

Masters Grade LevelPerformance in this category indicates that students are expected to succeed in the next grade or course with little or no academic intervention. Students in this category demonstrate the ability to think critically and apply the assessed knowledge and skills in varied contexts, both familiar and unfamiliar.

* For Algebra II and English III, this level of performance also indicates students are well prepared for postsecondary success.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.3

Meets Grade LevelPerformance in this category indicates that students have a high likelihood of success in the next grade or course but may still need some short-term, targeted academic intervention. Students in this category generally demonstrate the ability to think critically and apply the assessed knowledge and skills in familiar contexts.

** For Algebra II and English III, this level of performance also indicates students are sufficiently prepared for postsecondary success.

Approaches Grade LevelPerformance in this category indicates that students are likely to succeed in the next grade or course with targeted academic intervention. Students in this category generally demonstrate the ability to apply the assessed knowledge and skills in familiar contexts.

Did Not Meet Grade LevelPerformance in this category indicates that students are unlikely to succeed in the next grade or course without significant, ongoing academic intervention. Students in this category do not demonstrate a sufficient understanding of the assessed knowledge and skills.

Appropriate Score UsesSTAAR EOC assessment results have several uses, both for individual students and for comparing the performance of groups. A more detailed explanation of appropriate score uses can be found in the Technical Digest, available on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

Individual StudentsThe STAAR EOC scale score indicates whether a student has met a performance level and how far the student’s achievement is above or below a performance level. All students not achieving Approaches Grade Level performance on a STAAR EOC assessment must be offered additional instruction.

Assessment results can be used to compare the performance of an individual student to the performance of a de mographic group, a program group, or an entire campus or district in a particular course. For example, the scores for a Hispanic student in a gifted and talented program could be compared to the average scores of Hispanic students, to other gifted and talented students, or to all the students at the campus being assessed in the course.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.4

Groups of StudentsAssessment scores can be used to compare the performance of different demographic or program groups. All STAAR EOC scores can be analyzed within the same course for any single administration to determine which demographic or program group had the highest average scale score, the lowest percentage achieving each performance level, the highest percentage achieving Masters Grade Level performance, etc.

Other scores can be used to help evaluate the academic performance of demographic or program groups in core academic areas. For example, aggregations of reporting-category data can help districts and campuses identify areas of potential academic weakness for a group of students. This same methodology can be applied to an entire campus or district.

In addition, all assessment scores can be compared to regional and statewide performance within the same course for any administration.

Cautions for Score UseSeveral cautions must be kept in mind when analyzing the STAAR EOC assessment results. More detailed technical information describing cautions for score use is provided in the Technical Digest, available on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

Scale ScoresScale scores allow for a comparison of assessment scores, within a course, across administrations. For example, if a student takes the STAAR Algebra I assessment in May and takes the assessment again in June, the scores from those administrations could be compared.

The scale score cannot be used to compare assessment scores across courses. For example, it is not appropriate to say that a 3800 on the STAAR Biology assessment represents the same level of achievement as a 3800 on the STAAR Algebra I assessment.

Using Reporting-Category InformationReporting-category information at the individual student level should be used with caution due to the limited number of items in each reporting category. When aggregated at the campus or district level, such information might be useful in helping campuses identify skill areas in which further diagnosis is warranted. As with all assessments given at a single point in time, the data generated from this snapshot should be used in conjunction with other evaluations of performance to provide an in-depth portrait of student achievement. Once an area of possible weakness has been identified, supplementary data should be gathered to further define what instructional intervention would be most effective.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.5

Furthermore, because each STAAR EOC assessment is equated only at the total assessment level and there have been changes to the curriculum and the assessment, year-to-year comparisons of reporting-category performance should be made cautiously. The assessment is constructed to make the difficulty of a given reporting category similar for each administration of a STAAR EOC assessment. However, some fluctuations in the difficulty of the reporting categories do occur at every administration. Observing trends in reporting-category performance over time, identifying patterns of performance in clusters of reporting categories assessing similar skills, and comparing campus or district reporting-category performance to that of the region or state are appropriate uses of group reporting-category information.

Raw Score Distribution for Essay QuestionsBecause the essay questions from different administrations could be different items, the raw score distributions across administrations are not directly comparable.

Program EvaluationStandardized assessments are a valuable tool for evaluating programs. However, any assessment can furnish only one part of the picture. The STAAR EOC assessments are not able to identify, let alone measure, every factor that contributes to the success or failure of a program. Assessment results can be most helpful if considered as one component of an evaluation system.

The Passing Standard and Items CorrectThe passing standards for STAAR EOC are related to two factors: (1) the difficulty of the items on the assessments and (2) the number of items students have to answer correctly to pass. The standard is set on the original form of each course assessment. When different items are used in another administration, the difficulty of the items, and thus the overall difficulty of the assessment, might fluctuate. To compensate for slight changes in difficulty, the number of items needed to pass the assessment is adjusted.

Report FormatsStandard and additional reports are available for the STAAR EOC assessments. Assessment reports are provided automatically to districts. Additional services for assessment reports are also available for a fee to districts. A district must submit a request through the STAAR Assessment Management System to receive additional copies of the STAAR report card or Confidential Student Label.

Reports that include “confidential” in the title contain student-level results. All other reports present assessment results in an aggregated format. More information about the confidentiality of students’ assessment results is contained in the General Information section.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.6

Note that the sample reports included in this guide are for illustration only. They are provided to show the basic layout of the reports and the information they provide. Some information might not correspond to real values.

ResourcesRefer to the General Information section of this guide and T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage for additional STAAR EOC informa tion and resources.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.7

Assessment ReportsInformation contained in the assessment reports is sufficient to satisfy mandatory reporting requirements (refer to the General Information section). The following section of the guide describes the STAAR EOC assessment reports that districts receive:

STAAR Report Card 3.8

Confidential Student Label 3.14

Confidential Campus Roster 3.17

Summary Report 3.22

Constructed Responses Summary Report 3.26

Confidential Images of Essays 3.29

Confidential Student Item Analysis Report 3.32

Item Analysis Summary Report 3.35

Electronic Individual Student Record File (Confidential) 3.37

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.8

STAAR Report CardExamples shown: STAAR Grade 12

A separate STAAR Report Card is provided for each student for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted. Information from this report is useful when reporting assessment results to students and parents. Results for students taking one or more STAAR subjects will be combined on the same STAAR Report Card.

A. Performance At a GlanceThis shows the student’s performance levels for all the EOC assessments the student has taken to date. If the student has taken one test more than once, his or her best performance level for that test will be shown in this section.

B. Student Portal InformationThis provides the web address and access code for parents and students to access information from the STAAR Report Card online.

C. Student and School Identification InformationThe top of the STAAR Report Card contains identification information, for both the student (name, identification number, etc.) and the school (district, class group, etc.). For confidentiality, the student identification number (PEIMS) is indicated by five asterisks followed by the last four digits of the ID number. The grade and the report date are also indicated.

D. PercentileThis shows the percentage of students who scored below the student’s score when comparing the student’s performance to all Texas students who took the same test last year. For more information about last year’s scoring distribution, visit T E A’s STAAR Frequency Distributions webpage.

E. Student’s Scale ScoreThis is the student’s scale score, which is an indicator of his or her performance on the test. The STAAR scale score allows you to compare the student’s score with the score ranges of the Did Not Meet Grade Level, Approaches Grade Level, Meets Grade Level, and Masters Grade Level performance. The scale score indicates how far above or below these performance standards that the student has achieved.

F. Scale Score BarThis bar shows how well students could perform on the test. The placement of the student’s scale score shows where he or she actually performed on the test. The scores needed to achieve Approaches Grade Level, Meets Grade Level, and Masters Grade Level performance are also marked on the scale score bar.

G. Reporting CategoriesThe content and skills tested on each STAAR assessment are grouped together. Each group is called a reporting category. The categories for each subject are listed in this review description section.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.9

H. Weighted ScoreThis shows the points the student earned on the written composition out of the total points possible in the English tests. The process of weighting assessment scores emphasizes the contribution of the written composition when computing the final score. The raw score for English I, English II, and English III are calculated by adding the number of multiple choice items answered correctly to the weighted composition score [Number of multiple choice items answered correctly + (written composition score x 2)].

If a student had 44 of the 52 multiple choice items correct and received a score of 6 on the written composition, the student’s total raw score would be 56 out of possible 68 possible raw score points [44 + (6 x 2)].

I. Answered CorrectlyThis shows the number of questions the student answered correctly out of the total number of questions tested in each reporting category.

J. STAAR Progress MeasureThe STAAR Progress Measure is reported for students taking the Algebra I assessment for the first time if their 2018–2019 mathematics assessment was STAAR. The STAAR Progress Measure is reported for students taking the English II assessment for the first time if they took the English I assessment for the first time in the 2018–2019 accountability year. It is based on a comparison of a student’s English I or previous mathematics assessment score with his or her English II or Algebra I score. This measure gives you information about how much the student improved in the subject. Individual student progress is then categorized as Limited, Expected, or Accelerated.

Additional information about the STAAR Progress Measures can be found in the STAAR Resources section on TEA’s website.

K. Test InformationThis shows whether the student took the STAAR assessment with embedded supports on paper or took the STAAR assessment online with or without embedded supports.

L. Lexile Measure The Lexile measure indicates the difficulty of the materials that the student should be able to read successfully. The Lexile measure for STAAR students is reported in the range of Beginning Reader (BR or 0L) to a positive value in each grade (e.g., 1100L at grade 3, 1200L at grade 4, and so on).

M. Quantile Measure The Quantile measure indicates the progress made in learning mathematics content and what new mathematics content they may be ready to learn next. The Quantile measure for STAAR students is reported in the range of Emerging Mathematician (EM or 0L) to a positive value in each grade (e.g., 400Q at grade 3, 500Q at grade 4 and so on).

N. Resources These are strategies for college and career planning.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.10

Confidential 2021 STAAR Report Card for:

FIRSTNAME LASTNAMEFIRSTNAME’S PERFORMANCE AT A GLANCE

MeetsGrade Level

Test Date: Fall 2020

English I

ApproachesGrade Level

Test Date: Fall 2020

Algebra I

ApproachesGrade Level

Test Date: Spring 2021

Biology

Did Not MeetGrade Level

Test Date: Spring 2021

English II

MastersGrade Level

Test Date: Fall 2020

U.S. History

Go to TexasAssessment.gov and log in to learn more.

FIRSTNAME'SUNIQUE ACCESS

CODE 28Q7VKFrom The CommissionerTests are a part of life. Our kids will take tests to get a driver's license, to get into college, and even to get certain jobs. As a parent of four myself, I know that no one test can tell me everything about my children. But the STAAR tests have been designed to provide useful information about how much our children have learned academically and how well prepared they are for what comes next.

Students who meet or master grade level by high school graduation have more than a 60% chance of passing their college classes, substantially increasing their lifetime earnings and prospects for success. This report is intended to give you information on how well your child learned this year's academic material in school and how you can help them learn even more.

Maximize Time During Parent Teacher ConferencesSample Questions to Ask the Teacher:• .What do you see as my child’s strengths?• .What does my child seem to be the most interested in at school?• .Does my child get along well with their classmates?• .What is the most important thing that I can be doing to prepare my child

for college, a career, or the military?• .Is my child giving his/her best effort?• .What could my child be doing that he/she is not already doing?• .What do you think are the biggest challenges for my child, and how can

I help him/her with those challenges?

What the Results MeanThis report shows how well your child did on the STAAR. There are four levels of Performance.

MASTERS GRADE LEVELMastery of the course knowledge and skills is shown — student is on track for college and career readiness.

MEETS GRADE LEVELStrong knowledge of course content — student is prepared to progress to the next grade.

APPROACHES GRADE LEVELSome knowledge of course content but may be missing critical elements — student needs additional support in the coming year.

DID NOT MEET GRADE LEVELNo basic understanding of course expectations is shown — student may need significant support in the coming year.

Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education

A

B

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.11

End-of-Course (EOC) AssessmentsFIRSTNAME I. LASTNAME GRADE 12

Student ID: *****9999 Local Student ID: 999999999 District: 999-999 DISTRICT NAME

28Q7VK Want to see the questions FIRSTNAME answered incorrectly? Use this code to log in. TexasAssessment.gov

RUI = 0 ReportDocID = 9999999999999999_0046000605090699_0045410604000728_0045380602027987_0044980605273353

English I Test Date: Fall 2020

MEETSGRADE LEVELYour child scored the same or better than 71% of all students who took this test. Did Not Meet Grade Level

(1133-3774)Approaches Grade Level

(3775-3999)Meets Grade Level

(4000-4690)Masters Grade Level

(4691-6189)

Passing

Knowledge and Skills Categories for English IWritten Composition Multiple-Choice

Composition Understanding/ Analysis Across Genres

Understanding/ Analysis of Literary Texts

Understanding/ Analysis of Informational Texts

Revision Editing

14 of16 Total Points

8 Correct of8 Total

13 Correct of13 Total

13 Correct of13 Total

4 Correct of9 Total

0 Correct of9 Total

Algebra I Test Date: Fall 2020

APPROACHESGRADE LEVELYour child scored the same or better than 20% of all students who took this test. Did Not Meet Grade Level

(1402-3549)Approaches Grade Level

(3550-3999)Meets Grade Level

(4000-4332)Masters Grade Level

(4333-6114)

Passing

Knowledge and Skills Categories for Algebra INumber and Algebraic Methods

Describing and Graphing Linear Functions, Equations, and Inequalities

Writing and Solving Linear Functions, Equations, and Inequalities

Quadratic Functions and Equations

Exponential Functions and Equations

5 Correct of11 Total

4 Correct of12 Total

4 Correct of14 Total

4 Correct of11 Total

4 Correct of6 Total

Biology Test Date: Spring 2021 Paper with Embedded Supports

APPROACHESGRADE LEVELYour child scored the same or better than 28% of all students who took this test. Did Not Meet Grade Level

(1275-3549)Approaches Grade Level

(3550-3999)Meets Grade Level

(4000-4575)Masters Grade Level

(4576-6157)

Passing

Knowledge and Skills Categories for BiologyCell Structure and Function

Mechanisms of Genetics

Biological Evolution and Classification

Biological Processes and Systems

Interdependence within Environmental Systems

7 Correct of11 Total

4 Correct of11 Total

4 Correct of10 Total

6 Correct of11 Total

7 Correct of11 Total

D

H

I

J

G

C

E

F

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.12

End-of-Course (EOC) AssessmentsFIRSTNAME I. LASTNAME GRADE 12

Campus: 999 CAMPUS NAME Class Group: CLASS GROUPNAME Report Date: SPRING 2021

Here are some books recommended for FIRSTNAME.

Lexile Measure:1049L

Quantile Measure:955Q

Learn more about Lexile and Quantile measures and how they can be used to help your child

succeed at TexasAssessment.gov.

28Q7VK Find more books on FIRSTNAME’s reading level using the Find a Book tool. TexasAssessment.gov

Document #9999-99999 090921-99999999-999999999

English II Test Date: Spring 2021

DID NOT MEETGRADE LEVELYour child scored the same or better than 28% of all students who took this test. Did Not Meet Grade Level

(989-3774)Approaches Grade Level

(3775-3999)Meets Grade Level

(4000-4830)Masters Grade Level

(4831-6382)

Passing

Knowledge and Skills Categories for English IIWritten Composition Multiple-Choice

Composition Understanding/ Analysis Across Genres

Understanding/ Analysis of Literary Texts

Understanding/ Analysis of Informational Texts

Revision Editing

16 of16 Total Points

8 Correct of8 Total

11 Correct of13 Total

1 Correct of13 Total

0 Correct of9 Total

0 Correct of9 Total

U.S. History Test Date: Fall 2020 Paper with Embedded Supports

MASTERSGRADE LEVELYour child scored the same or better than 85% of all students who took this test. Did Not Meet Grade Level

(939-3549)Approaches Grade Level

(3550-3999)Meets Grade Level

(4000-4439)Masters Grade Level

(4440-6464)

Passing

Knowledge and Skills Categories for U.S. HistoryHistory Geography and Culture Government and Citizenship Economics, Science, Technology,

and Society

22 Correct of30 Total

12 Correct of12 Total

10 Correct of10 Total

16 Correct of16 Total

K

L M

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.13

RESOURCES TAILORED FOR FIRSTNAMEPlan for College

Learning about Colleges and Degree Programs

• .Visit colleges and universities that interest you and meet with visiting college admissions representatives at your school.

• .Familiarize yourself with college admissions requirements, application deadlines, and tuition costs.

Preparing for College in High School• .Enroll in advanced coursework, such as

Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate classes, and dual credit options offered by a local community college.

• .Prepare for the SAT and/or ACT. • .Learn about ways to pay for college (e.g.,

available scholarships, the FAFSA and TASFA).

Building a College Resume• .Take on leadership roles within extracurricular

activities and community service opportunities (colleges look for students who are active leaders in their schools).

• .Practice writing a college application essay.

Prepare for a Career

Exploring Career Options• .Research local or regional demand for

careers and occupations aligned to your coursework and endorsement.

• .Interview or explore videos of career professionals who can explain their work responsibilities and requirements for success.

• .Talk with a recruiter about military enlistment options.

Planning a Course of Study• .Explore associates degree or post-secondary

career certification programs aligned with your Career and Technical Education (CTE) coursework.

• .Enroll in a capstone CTE practicum course that offers real-world experiences and/or work-based learning opportunities (e.g., apprenticeships, job-shadowing, or paid internships).

Exploring Career-based Opportunities• .Take advantage of opportunities to intern or

job-shadow at a local business or other organization.

• .Consider participating in summer career skill-building programs hosted by businesses or other organizations.

College and Career Planning Suggested Questions To Ask Your High School Counselor

1. When is the next opportunity to attend a college tour or meet with a college admissions representatives? 2. Where can I get assistance completing college applications (and essays) needed for Apply Texas and the

Common App? 3. Which community college programs have the best career training programs related to my endorsement and

coursework? 4. What other college credit and career prep classes can I take in 12th grade? Which dual credit, AP, or

International Baccalaureate courses will help me achieve my goals? 5. What are the exam schedules for the ACT and SAT? What college exam prep does our district offer? 6. Where can I find information about summer internships with local businesses/organizations? 7. Where can I learn about completing the FAFSA and TASFA? How do I create a PIN? 8. Where can I find information about potential college scholarship opportunities?

Confidential 2020 STAAR Report Card for:

FIRSTNAME LASTNAMEFIRSTNAME’S PERFORMANCE AT A GLANCE

MeetsGrade Level

Test Date: Summer 2019

English I

MastersGrade Level

Test Date: Summer 2019

Algebra I

ApproachesGrade Level

Test Date: Summer 2018

Biology

MastersGrade Level

Test Date: Summer 2018

English II

Did Not MeetGrade Level

Test Date: Spring 2020

U.S. History

Go to TexasAssessment.gov and log in to learn more.

FIRSTNAME'SUNIQUE ACCESS

CODE 28Q5KJFrom The CommissionerTests are a part of life. Our kidswill take tests to get a driver'slicense, to get into college,and even to get certain jobs.As a parent of four myself,I know that no one test cantell me everything about mychildren. But the STAAR testshave been designed to provideuseful information about howmuch our children have learnedacademically and how wellprepared they are for whatcomes next.

Students who meet or mastergrade level by high schoolgraduation have more than a60% chance of passing theircollege classes, substantiallyincreasing their lifetime earningsand prospects for success.This report is intended to giveyou information on how wellyour child learned this year'sacademic material in school andhow you can help them learneven more.

Maximize Time During Parent Teacher ConferencesSample Questions to Ask the Teacher:• .What do you see as my child’s strengths?• .What does my child seem to be the most interested in at school?• .Does my child get along well with their classmates?• .What is the most important thing that I can be doing to prepare my child

for college, a career, or the military?• .Is my child giving his/her best effort?• .What could my child be doing that he/she is not already doing?• .What do you think are the biggest challenges for my child, and how can

I help him/her with those challenges?

What the Results MeanThis report shows how well your child did on the STAAR. There are four levels of Performance.

MASTERSGRADE LEVELMastery of the course knowledge and skills is shown — student is on track for college and career readiness.

MEETSGRADE LEVELStrong knowledge of course content — student is prepared to progress to the next grade.

APPROACHESGRADE LEVELSome knowledge of course content but may be missing critical elements — studentneeds additional support in the coming year.

DID NOT MEET GRADE LEVELNo basic understanding of course expectations is shown — student may need significant support in the coming year.

Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education

N

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.14

Confidential Student LabelExample shown: STAAR EOC Grade 9

An adhesive Confidential Student Label is provided for each student for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted. Cumulative history results are shown for each EOC course, and these labels should be placed on the student’s permanent record. Districts also have the option of not receiving labels.

Available: STAAR EOC results are combined on one label per student.

A. Student Identification InformationIdentification information shown at the top of the label includes the student name, student identification number (as used for P E I M S), birth date, district number and name, campus number and name, and grade.

B. Test DateThe date when the student passed or the student’s most recent performance status is given for each course.

C. Scale ScoreThe scale score corresponding to the student’s raw score is shown. Refer to Assessment Scores in the Program Overview for additional information about the STAAR EOC scale scores. The raw score conversion tables for all STAAR administrations can be found on TEA’s Performance Reporting Department webpage.

D. Test ResultsIn place of a scale score, a variety of report comments might appear for each course, indicating the student’s performance status or scoring information.

Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

ABSENT The student was absent during the assessment.

• NOT SCORED The student’s answer document was coded “O” for other reasons such as illness or administration irregularities.

• SUBSTITUTE ASSESSMENT If the student has valid substitute assessment indicated and has not passed the STAAR EOC subject.

E. Performance LevelThe label indicates for each course whether the student achieved the Did Not Meet Grade Level, Approaches Grade Level, Meets Grade Level, or Masters Grade Level performance. Refer to Performance Standards in the Program Overview for additional information about these standards.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.15

F. InfoInformation about the assessment is provided whenever the student is assessed with something other than the general STAAR assessment. The information is indicated by one or two characters, and the description of the characters used will also be listed on the label.

Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

e Online with Embedded Supports An online assessment with embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

o Online with No Embedded Supports An online assessment with no embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

pe Paper with Embedded Supports A paper assessment with embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.16

Info Test Date Scale Score Performance Level

Algebra I Fall20 3550 ApproachesBiology pe Spr21 3769 ApproachesEnglish I Fall20 4209 MeetsEnglish II Spr21 3585 Did Not MeetU.S. History Fall20 4760 Masters

p,p,p,p,EOC CONFIDENTIALSTUDENT: LASTNAME FIRSTNAME ISTUDENT ID (PEIMS): 999999999DISTRICT: 999-999 DISTRICT NAME DOB: 09/09/99CAMPUS: 999 CAMPUS NAME GRADE: 9

p pe = Paper with Embedded Supports

A

BF D E

C

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.17

Confidential Campus RosterExample shown: STAAR English II

The Confidential Campus Roster is available for each course assessed at each campus and lists every student for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted. This report provides detailed student-level results for each course assessment.

The Confidential Campus Roster (Students Not Achieving Approaches Grade Level) is available for each course assessed at each campus and lists every student for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted, but did not pass the course assessment.

The Confidential Campus Roster (All Out-of-School Examinees) is available for each course assessed at each campus for which there were out-of-school examinees and lists each out-of-school examinee for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted.

Students NOT included in the reporting-category summary results of the reports: - STAAR with Embedded Supports paper administrations- Braille- American Sign Language video

A. Campus Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information for the campus. The course, report date, and date of testing are also indicated. The date of testing will be the season and year the assessment occurred. The logo in the upper left-hand corner indicates the program reported.

B. Student InformationStudents are identified by name and student identification number (as used for P E I M S).

C. GradeThe student’s enrolled grade at the time of the assessment is indicated.

D. Scale ScoreThe scale score corresponding to the student’s raw score is shown. Refer to Assessment Scores in the Program Overview for additional information about the scale scores. The raw score conversion tables for all STAAR EOC administrations can be found on TEA’s Assessment Scoring and Reporting webpage.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.18

E. Performance Levels

� Approaches•

If the student met Approaches, “YES” is shown.• If the student did not meet Approaches, “NO” is shown.• If a score code other than “S” is present, “---” is shown.

� Meets•

If the student achieves Meets, “YES” is shown.• If the student did not achieve Meets, “NO” is shown.• If a score code other than “S” is present, “---” is shown.

� Masters•

If the student achieves Masters, “YES” is shown.• If the student did not achieve Masters, “NO” is shown.• If a score code other than “S” is present, “---” is shown.

F. STAAR Progress MeasureThe STAAR Progress Measure is reported for students taking the Algebra I assessment for the first time if their 2018–2019 mathematics assessment was STAAR. The STAAR Progress Measure is reported for students taking the English II assessment for the first time if they took the English I assessment for the first time in the 2018–2019 accountability year. It is based on a comparison of a student’s English I or previous mathematics assessment score with his or her English II or Algebra I score. This measure gives you information about how much the student improved in the subject. Individual student progress is then categorized as Limited, Expected, or Accelerated.

Additional information about the STAAR Progress Measures can be found in the STAAR Resources section on T E A’s website.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.19

G. Results for Each Reporting Category

Algebra I, Algebra II, Biology, and U.S. HistoryReporting category titles appear in the column headings. The number of items assessed in each reporting category is indicated below the reporting category titles. The number of items correct out of the total number of items for each reporting category is shown in the column headed “Number of Items Correct.”

English I, English II, and English IIIReporting category titles appear in the column headings. The number of points possible in each reporting category is indicated below the reporting category titles. The number of points scored out of the total possible points possible for each reporting category is shown in the column headed “Number of Points Scored.”

MessagesIn place of reporting-category-level data, a variety of report messages might appear, indicating the student’s performance status or scoring information.

Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

NOT SCORED The student’s answer document was coded “O” for reasons such as illness during the assessment and administration irregularities.

• NOT TESTED—ABSENT The student was absent during the assessment.

• NOT SCORED—PREVIOUSLY ACHIEVED APPROACHES GRADE LEVEL The student previously achieved the Approaches Grade Level performance.

H. InfoInformation about the assessment is provided whenever the student was administered an online assessment with embedded supports, an online assessment with no embedded supports, or a paper assessment with embedded supports. The information is indicated by characters or a symbol, and the description of the characters or symbol is shown in the legend.

I. Total Students Listed and Total Students TestedTotal Students Listed indicates the number of students included on the report. Total Students Tested indicates the total number of students that took this assessment.

J. Average Scale ScoreOn the final page of the report, this number represents the average scale score of the total number of students tested on the report.

K. Performance Results•

Number On the final page of the report, this number represents the total number of “YES” results for the entire report.

• Percent On the final page of the report, this number represents the percentage of “YES” results for all students tested on the report.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.20

L. Average Reporting Category ResultsThese columns summarize reporting-category-level data for all scored assessments. For each reporting category, the average number and the percentage of items students answered correctly are calculated. The average number of items correct is the total number of items correct divided by the total number of students assessed. The average percentage of items correct is the average total number of items correct divided by the total number of items assessed.

M. Process NumberThe process number found in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the report.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.21

NO

T S

CO

RE

DN

OT

TES

TED

-AB

SE

NT

NO

T TE

STE

D-A

BS

EN

T

STA

TE O

F TE

XAS

ASS

ESSM

ENTS

OF

AC

AD

EMIC

REA

DIN

ESS

Con

fiden

tial C

ampu

s R

oste

rEN

GLI

SH II

All

Stud

ents

Dat

e of

Tes

ting:

SP

RIN

G 2

021

Dis

tric

t: 99

9-99

9 D

ISTR

ICT

NA

ME

Cam

pus:

999

CA

MP

US

NA

ME

Rep

ort D

ate:

SP

RIN

G 2

021

Lege

nd---

=

No

Info

rmat

ion

Ava

ilabl

epe

= P

aper

with

Em

bedd

ed S

uppo

rts.

Dat

a ar

e no

t inc

lude

d in

the

repo

rtin

g ca

tego

ry s

umm

ary

info

rmat

ion.

o =

Onl

ine

with

no

Embe

dded

Sup

port

se

= O

nlin

e w

ith E

mbe

dded

Sup

port

s. B

raill

e or

Am

eric

an S

ign

Lang

uage

vid

eo re

sults

are

not

incl

uded

in th

e re

port

ing

cate

gory

sum

mar

y in

form

atio

n.Pr

ogre

ss M

easu

re: 0

=Lim

ited,

1=E

xpec

ted,

2=A

ccel

erat

ed

Info

Stud

ent

Stud

ent-I

D(P

EIM

S)G

r

Scale Score

Approaches

Meets

Masters

STAARProgress Measure

Res

ults

for E

ach

Rep

ortin

g C

ateg

ory

12

34

56

Und

erst

andi

ng/

Ana

lysi

s A

cros

s G

enre

s

Und

erst

andi

ng/

Ana

lysi

s of

Li

tera

ry T

exts

Und

erst

andi

ng/

Ana

lysi

s of

In

form

atio

nal

Text

sC

ompo

sitio

nR

evis

ion

Editi

ng

Num

ber o

f Poi

nts

Poss

ible

813

1316

99

Num

ber o

f Poi

nts

Scor

ed

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0997

1N

ON

ON

O0

00

00

0o

LAS

TNA

ME

FIR

STN

AM

EI

9999

9999

909

971

NO

NO

NO

00

00

00

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0997

1N

ON

ON

O0

00

00

0o

LAS

TNA

ME

FIR

STN

AM

EI

9999

9999

909

2641

NO

NO

NO

00

00

09

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0926

41N

ON

ON

O0

00

09

0

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0928

35N

ON

ON

O0

013

00

0o

LAS

TNA

ME

FIR

STN

AM

EI

9999

9999

909

2835

NO

NO

NO

013

00

00

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0999

90N

ON

ON

O8

00

00

0o

LAS

TNA

ME

FIR

STN

AM

EI

9999

9999

909

---

---

---

---

---

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

09--

---

---

---

---

-

oLA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

0929

12N

ON

ON

O0

00

09

6LA

STN

AM

EFI

RS

TNA

ME

I99

9999

999

09--

---

---

---

---

-a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

292

TOTA

L ST

UD

ENTS

LIS

TED

: 190

AVE

RA

GE:

3290

AVE

RA

GE

TOTA

L ST

UD

ENTS

TES

TED

: 165

NU

MB

ER:

4538

215.

06.

34.

08.

51.

81.

1PE

RC

ENT:

2723

1362

4931

5320

12

Pag

e 8

of 8

0909

2021

-999

9999

9-99

9999

999

A

H

F

CD

L

B

J

I

E

G

KM

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.22

Summary ReportExamples shown: STAAR Algebra I (Retested Students), STAAR English I (All Students)

The Summary Report is available for each course assessed at each campus and district and contains aggregate information about every student for whom a STAAR EOC answer document or online record was submitted.

Standard Summary Reports: - All Students - First-Time Tested Students - Retested Students

Students NOT included in the reporting-category level and written composition results of the reports: - STAAR with Embedded Supports paper administrations- Braille- American Sign Language video

A. Campus or District Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information for the campus or district. The course, report date, and date of testing are also indicated. The date of testing will be the season and year of administration. The logo in the upper left corner of the summary report indicates the program reported.

B. Administration SummaryThis section of the report lists the number and percentage of students who were assessed, the number and percentage of students who were not assessed (broken down by students who were absent and other), and total number of documents submitted.

C. LegendTo maintain student confidentiality, no data are reported if fewer than five students were assessed. The legend indicates this by showing “---.”

D. Demographic Groups and Program InformationDemographic and program categories are listed on the left side of this section. Results for students for whom no demographic or program information was available are included in the “No Information Provided” categories.

E. Number of Students TestedThe number of students assessed is provided for each demographic group.

F. Average Scale ScoreThe average scale score is displayed for each demographic group. Refer to Assessment Scores in the Program Overview for additional information about the STAAR EOC scale scores.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.23

G. Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets, and Masters Grade LevelThe number and percentage of students who achieved the Did Not Meet, Approaches, Meets, and Masters Grade Level performance are displayed for each program and demographic group.

Masters Grade Level indicates that students demonstrate mastery of the course knowledge and skills. They are on-track for college and career readiness. Meets Grade Level indicates that students demonstrate strong knowledge of course content. They are prepared to progress to the next grade. Approaches Grade Level indicates that students demonstrate some knowledge of course content, but may be missing critical elements. They need additional support in the coming year. Did Not Meet Grade Level indicates that the students demonstrate no basic understanding of course expectations. They may need significant support in the coming year. Refer to Performance Standards in the Program Overview for additional information about these standards.

H. Results for Each Reporting Category These columns summarize reporting-category-level data for all scored assessments. For each reporting category, the average number (#) and the percentage (%) of items students answered correctly are calculated. The average number of items correct is the total number of items correct divided by the total number of students assessed. The average percentage of items correct is the average total number of items correct divided by the total number of items assessed.

I. Written Composition SummaryThe English assessments include an essay with scores ranging from 0 to 8. The number of possible points for the essay item is 16. The average number of points in the first column should be interpreted as the average number of points scored for all scored assessments for each demographic group. The percentage scored in the second column should be interpreted as the average points scored converted to a percentage for each demographic group. Detailed rubric and score point information can be found in the scoring guides on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

J. Process Number The process number found in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the report.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.24

Ret

este

d St

uden

ts

STA

TE O

F TE

XAS

ASS

ESSM

ENTS

OF

AC

AD

EMIC

REA

DIN

ESS

Sum

mar

y R

epor

tA

LGEB

RA

ID

ate

of T

estin

g:

Dis

tric

t: S

PR

ING

202

1C

ampu

s: 99

9-99

9 D

ISTR

ICT

NA

ME

Rep

ort D

ate:

99

9 C

AM

PU

S N

AM

ES

PR

ING

202

1

Lege

nd---

= N

o D

ata

Rep

orte

d Fo

r Few

er T

han

Five

Stu

dent

s

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Sum

mar

y

Num

ber

Perc

ent

Stud

ents

Tes

ted

Stud

ents

Not

Tes

ted

Oth

erTo

tal D

ocum

ents

Sub

mitt

ed

Abs

ent

8389 0

011

10 9310

0

Number ofStudents Tested

AverageScale Score

Did Not Meet

Approaches

Meets

Masters

#%

#%

#%

#%

Res

ults

for E

ach

Rep

ortin

g C

ateg

ory*

12

34

5

Number and Algebraic Methods

Describing and Graphing Linear Functions, Equations, and Inequalities

Writing and Solving Linear Functions, Equations,and Inequalities

Quadratic Functions and Equations

Exponential Functions and Equations

Num

ber o

f Ite

ms

Test

ed11

1214

116

Avg

. # o

f Ite

ms

/ % C

orre

ct#

%#

%#

%#

%#

%A

ll St

uden

ts83

2742

8310

00

00

00

01.

816

1.8

152.

518

1.2

111.

017

Mal

e43

2751

4310

00

00

00

02.

018

1.8

152.

317

1.0

91.

119

Fem

ale

4027

3240

100

00

00

00

1.5

141.

715

2.8

201.

413

0.8

14N

o In

form

atio

n Pr

ovid

ed0

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

His

pani

c/La

tino

2427

3124

100

00

00

00

1.4

131.

210

2.8

201.

715

0.9

15A

mer

ican

Indi

an o

r Ala

ska

Nat

ive

631

026

100

00

00

00

6.3

582.

722

0.7

50.

76

0.7

11A

sian

930

349

100

00

00

00

2.2

202.

319

2.4

171.

312

2.0

33B

lack

or A

fric

an A

mer

ican

1028

3010

100

00

00

00

1.6

152.

723

1.9

141.

312

1.8

30N

ativ

e H

awai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nder

631

736

100

00

00

00

3.8

351.

815

4.5

321.

715

1.5

25W

hite

827

868

100

00

00

00

0.1

12.

319

2.5

181.

413

0.5

8Tw

o or

Mor

e R

aces

1422

0514

100

00

00

00

0.8

70.

86

2.0

140.

55

0.5

9N

o In

form

atio

n Pr

ovid

ed6

2604

610

00

00

00

00.

55

2.3

193.

827

0.3

30.

23

Econ

omic

ally

5127

7051

100

00

00

00

1.9

171.

613

2.4

171.

312

1.3

21D

isad

vant

aged

828

658

100

00

00

00

1.0

93.

126

2.6

190.

87

0.5

824

2641

2410

00

00

00

01.

715

1.7

143.

021

1.1

100.

69

Title

I, P

art A

3227

4932

100

00

00

00

2.5

231.

714

1.9

140.

98

0.8

1422

2867

2210

00

00

00

01.

514

1.8

153.

122

1.5

141.

220

2926

3929

100

00

00

00

1.1

101.

916

2.9

201.

312

1.0

17M

igra

nt18

2966

1810

00

00

00

03.

733

1.9

162.

518

0.9

90.

813

2927

7829

100

00

00

00

1.6

141.

513

2.9

201.

614

0.8

1436

2601

3610

00

00

00

01.

09

1.9

162.

317

1.0

91.

321

Lim

ited

Engl

ish

2228

9022

100

00

00

00

3.3

302.

420

2.3

160.

98

0.8

13Pr

ofic

ient

630

576

100

00

00

00

3.0

271.

08

4.5

321.

09

0.8

143

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

2--

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

-2

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

2--

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

-24

2747

2410

00

00

00

01.

211

1.6

142.

619

1.7

150.

712

2426

3824

100

00

00

00

1.2

112.

117

2.9

211.

413

1.0

16B

iling

ual

2329

2223

100

00

00

00

3.2

292.

319

2.9

201.

09

0.8

1425

2801

2510

00

00

00

01.

614

1.5

132.

921

1.6

150.

813

3525

8135

100

00

00

00

1.0

91.

613

2.1

151.

110

1.3

21ES

L27

2566

2710

00

00

00

00.

98

1.3

102.

115

1.4

121.

016

1929

1619

100

00

00

00

3.1

281.

714

2.8

200.

87

0.6

1037

2781

3710

00

00

00

01.

716

2.2

182.

719

1.3

121.

321

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

2229

0922

100

00

00

00

3.2

292.

319

2.8

200.

98

0.7

1223

2773

2310

00

00

00

01.

715

1.7

142.

719

1.3

120.

814

3826

2638

100

00

00

00

1.0

91.

513

2.3

171.

312

1.3

21G

ifted

/Tal

ente

d19

2977

1910

00

00

00

03.

532

2.5

212.

417

0.9

80.

712

2327

7323

100

00

00

00

1.7

151.

714

2.7

191.

312

0.8

1441

2615

4110

00

00

00

01.

09

1.5

132.

618

1.3

121.

220

At-R

isk

1829

6618

100

00

00

00

3.7

331.

916

2.5

180.

99

0.8

1323

2773

2310

00

00

00

01.

715

1.7

142.

719

1.3

120.

814

4226

2842

100

00

00

00

1.0

91.

815

2.5

181.

312

1.2

20

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dC

urre

nt L

EP

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

1st Y

ear)

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

2nd

Yea

r)N

on-L

EP

(Mon

itore

d 3r

d Y

ear)

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

4th

Yea

r)N

on-L

EP

(Pos

t Mon

itorin

g)O

ther

Non

-LE

PN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Par

ticip

ants

Non

parti

cipa

nts

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

d

* R

esul

ts fo

r stu

dent

s w

ho to

ok th

e te

st w

ith th

e B

raill

e, A

mer

ican

Sig

n La

ngua

ge v

ideo

s ac

com

mod

atio

n, o

r the

pap

er S

TAA

R w

ith e

mbe

dded

sup

ports

are

not

in

clud

ed in

the

repo

rting

cat

egor

y re

sults

.09

0921

-999

9999

9-99

9999

999

A

C D

B

HJ

FE

G

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.25

All

Stud

ents

STA

TE O

F TE

XAS

ASS

ESSM

ENTS

OF

AC

AD

EMIC

REA

DIN

ESS

Sum

mar

y R

epor

tEN

GLI

SH I

Dat

e of

Tes

ting:

D

istr

ict:

SP

RIN

G 2

021

Cam

pus:

999-

999

DIS

TRIC

T N

AM

ER

epor

t Dat

e:

999

CA

MP

US

NA

ME

SP

RIN

G 2

021

Lege

nd---

= N

o D

ata

Rep

orte

d Fo

r Few

er T

han

Five

Stu

dent

s

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Sum

mar

y

Num

ber

Perc

ent

Stud

ents

Tes

ted

Stud

ents

Not

Tes

ted

Oth

erTo

tal D

ocum

ents

Sub

mitt

ed

Abs

ent

181

89 13

1020 204

100

Number ofStudents Tested

AverageScale Score

Did Not Meet

Approaches

Meets

Masters

#%

#%

#%

#%

Res

ults

for E

ach

Rep

ortin

g C

ateg

ory*

12

34

56

Understanding/Analysis Across Genres

Understanding/Analysis ofLiterary Texts

Understanding/Analysis ofInformationalTexts

Composition

Revision

Editing

Num

ber o

f Poi

nts

Poss

ible

813

1316

99

Num

ber o

f Poi

nts

Scor

ed#

%#

%#

%#

%#

%#

%A

ll St

uden

ts18

134

1012

267

5933

4726

2112

5.1

646.

550

4.4

348.

855

1.9

220.

911

Mal

e90

3593

5966

3134

2629

1517

4.7

596.

349

4.1

329.

962

2.2

241.

315

Fem

ale

9132

2963

6928

3121

236

75.

569

6.6

514.

736

7.7

481.

719

0.6

6N

o In

form

atio

n Pr

ovid

ed0

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

His

pani

c/La

tino

5334

1631

5822

4220

388

154.

962

6.6

515.

341

9.1

573.

033

1.2

13A

mer

ican

Indi

an o

r Ala

ska

Nat

ive

1434

6511

793

212

141

76.

278

7.6

584.

031

8.0

500.

910

0.6

7A

sian

1234

778

674

332

171

87.

999

8.6

664.

535

7.4

460.

910

0.9

10B

lack

or A

fric

an A

mer

ican

1632

6612

754

253

190

05.

063

6.9

533.

225

8.5

531.

820

0.0

0N

ativ

e H

awai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nder

1533

0411

734

272

131

73.

847

5.1

392.

520

7.7

480.

89

0.8

9W

hite

933

356

673

331

111

115.

669

6.8

525.

341

6.7

421.

011

0.9

10Tw

o or

Mor

e R

aces

2934

3919

6610

349

315

175.

063

5.9

454.

736

9.3

582.

225

1.3

15N

o In

form

atio

n Pr

ovid

ed33

3467

2473

927

824

412

4.6

585.

946

3.9

309.

761

1.6

170.

910

Econ

omic

ally

104

3505

6663

3837

3130

1212

5.5

697.

154

4.8

379.

157

2.3

261.

011

Dis

adva

ntag

ed17

3298

1165

635

424

16

5.3

666.

852

5.2

407.

849

1.5

160.

67

6032

7945

7515

2512

208

134.

455

5.4

413.

527

8.6

541.

416

0.9

11Ti

tle I,

Par

t A80

3434

4961

3139

2430

79

5.3

676.

852

5.2

409.

157

2.2

250.

910

3536

4922

6313

3712

346

176.

277

6.6

514.

535

9.1

572.

124

1.2

1366

3255

5177

1523

1117

812

4.3

546.

046

3.3

268.

352

1.5

170.

910

Mig

rant

3534

7422

6313

3710

294

114.

759

5.9

454.

333

9.8

612.

527

1.2

1451

3391

3467

1733

1325

48

6.1

777.

054

5.2

407.

849

1.9

210.

78

9533

9766

6929

3124

2513

144.

759

6.4

494.

131

9.0

561.

820

1.0

11Li

mite

d En

glis

h25

3584

1560

1040

728

416

5.1

647.

658

4.8

3710

.163

2.1

241.

517

Prof

icie

nt9

3338

889

111

111

111

4.9

616.

046

3.9

306.

943

1.0

110.

910

737

674

573

433

432

295.

771

4.3

334.

333

8.3

523.

033

3.0

338

3370

563

338

338

113

5.1

645.

643

3.9

308.

654

1.9

210.

00

2435

5516

678

338

334

174.

961

5.0

384.

030

9.5

592.

730

1.2

1324

3555

1667

833

833

417

4.9

615.

038

4.0

309.

559

2.7

301.

213

4534

4728

6217

3813

294

96.

176

7.5

585.

441

8.5

532.

123

0.8

963

3236

4673

1727

1219

58

4.5

566.

348

3.9

308.

653

1.5

170.

67

Bili

ngua

l36

3533

2364

1336

1028

411

5.1

646.

751

4.4

3410

.163

2.4

271.

213

5334

2234

6419

3615

287

135.

974

7.0

545.

341

7.7

482.

123

0.9

1092

3355

6571

2729

2224

1011

4.7

586.

147

3.9

308.

956

1.7

190.

910

ESL

4834

7229

6019

4015

316

136.

176

7.2

555.

442

8.3

522.

325

1.1

1233

3472

2267

1133

824

618

4.3

545.

643

3.5

279.

761

1.8

201.

416

100

3360

7171

2929

2424

99

4.9

626.

550

4.3

338.

755

1.8

210.

78

Spec

ial E

duca

tion

4135

3824

5917

4113

326

155.

063

6.6

514.

736

9.5

592.

629

1.3

1547

3408

3166

1634

1226

49

6.2

777.

256

5.3

417.

949

1.9

210.

89

9333

5567

7226

2822

2411

124.

658

6.0

463.

830

9.0

561.

719

0.9

10G

ifted

/Tal

ente

d34

3513

2162

1338

1029

412

5.0

626.

450

4.4

349.

761

2.5

281.

314

4734

0831

6616

3412

264

96.

277

7.2

565.

341

7.9

491.

921

0.8

910

033

7670

7030

3025

2513

134.

758

6.1

474.

031

8.9

561.

820

0.9

10A

t-Ris

k33

3522

2061

1339

1030

412

4.9

616.

449

4.5

359.

861

2.6

291.

314

4834

0032

6716

3312

254

86.

075

7.1

555.

240

8.0

501.

921

0.8

910

033

7870

7030

3025

2513

134.

859

6.2

484.

031

8.8

551.

820

0.9

10

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dC

urre

nt L

EP

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

1st Y

ear)

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

2nd

Yea

r)N

on-L

EP

(Mon

itore

d 3r

d Y

ear)

Non

-LE

P (M

onito

red

4th

Yea

r)N

on-L

EP

(Pos

t Mon

itorin

g)O

ther

Non

-LE

PN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Par

ticip

ants

Non

parti

cipa

nts

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

dP

artic

ipan

tsN

onpa

rtici

pant

sN

o In

form

atio

n P

rovi

ded

Yes No

No

Info

rmat

ion

Pro

vide

d

* R

esul

ts fo

r stu

dent

s w

ho to

ok th

e te

st w

ith th

e B

raill

e, A

mer

ican

Sig

n La

ngua

ge v

ideo

s ac

com

mod

atio

n, o

r the

pap

er S

TAA

R w

ith e

mbe

dded

sup

ports

are

not

in

clud

ed in

the

repo

rting

cat

egor

y re

sults

.09

0921

-999

9999

9-99

9999

999

C D

B

HJ

FE

G

AI

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.26

Constructed Responses Summary Report Examples shown: STAAR English I (All Students)

The Constructed Responses Summary Report is provided for each district and campus and shows the number and percentage of students receiving each rating for the written composition.

Available: STAAR EOC

Standard Summary Reports: - All Students - First-time Tested Students - Retested Students

Students NOT included in the reports: - STAAR with Embedded Supports paper administrations- Braille- American Sign Language video

A. Campus or District Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information for the campus or district. The course, report date, and the date of testing are also indicated.

B. Written Composition Rating SummaryA breakdown of the number and percentage of students who achieved each rating on the written composition is shown. Detailed rubric and score point information can be found in the Assessment Scoring and Reporting webpage.

Composition ratings are shown below.

0 = Nonscorable (summed score: 0 out of a possible 8)

2 = Very Limited (summed score: 2 out of a possible 8)

3 = Between Very Limited and Basic (summed score: 3 out of a possible 8)

4 = Basic (summed score: 4 out of a possible 8)

5 = Between Basic and Satisfactory (summed score: 5 out of a possible 8)

6 = Satisfactory (summed score: 6 out of a possible 8)

7 = Between Satisfactory and Accomplished (summed score: 7 out of a possible 8)

8 = Accomplished (summed score: 8 out of a possible 8)

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.27

C. Number of Papers The number of students receiving each rating is shown in the column with the heading “#.” The total number is shown at the bottom of this column.

The percentage of the total number of students receiving each composition rating (0, 2–8) is shown in the column with the heading “%.” The total percentage is shown at the bottom of this column. The percentage of the students on the “Total” row will always be 100.

D. GraphThe graph shows a visual representation of the percentage of students receiving each composition rating.

E. Process NumberThe process number found in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the report.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.28

Writ

ten

Com

posi

tion

Rat

ing

Sum

mar

y*

Expo

sito

ry C

ompo

sitio

n

Each

com

posi

tion

has

been

sco

red

inde

pend

ently

by

two

read

ers.

The

writ

ten

com

posi

tion

ratin

g of

0-8

repr

esen

ts th

e su

mm

atio

n of

thes

e sc

ores

.

--- =

No

Dat

a R

epor

ted

For F

ewer

Tha

n Fi

ve S

tude

nts

Rat

ing

#%

039

22

211

6

318

10

417

10

514

8

611

6

731

18

834

19

Tota

l17

510

0

PERCENT

0909

21-9

9999

999-

9999

9999

9*

Res

ults

for s

tude

nts

who

took

the

test

with

the

Bra

ille,

Am

eric

an S

ign

Lang

uage

vid

eos

acco

mm

odat

ion,

or t

he p

aper

STA

AR

with

em

bedd

ed s

uppo

rts a

re

not i

nclu

ded

in th

is re

port.

All

Stud

ents

STA

TE O

F TE

XAS

ASS

ESSM

ENTS

OF

AC

AD

EMIC

REA

DIN

ESS

Con

stru

cted

Res

pons

es S

umm

ary

Rep

ort

ENG

LISH

ID

ate

of T

estin

g:

Dis

tric

t: S

PR

ING

202

1C

ampu

s: 99

9-99

9 D

ISTR

ICT

NA

ME

Rep

ort D

ate:

99

9 C

AM

PU

S N

AM

ES

PR

ING

202

1

A

C

E

DB

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.29

Confidential Images of EssaysExample shown: STAAR English I Essay

The Confidential Images of Essays includes written compositions. Districts might find it helpful to use the Confidential Images of Essays in conjunction with the corresponding released STAAR tests.

Available: STAAR

A. Assessment InformationThe program, content area, and season and year of the assessment scored is indicated.

B. Student Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information for the student. The student name, date-of-birth, and PEIMS identification is shown. For confidentiality, the student identification number (PEIMS) is indicated by five asterisks followed by the last four digits of the ID number.

C. Written Composition ScoreComposition ratings are shown below.

0 = Nonscorable

2 = Very Limited

3 = Between Very Limited and Basic

4 = Basic

5 = Between Basic and Satisfactory

6 = Satisfactory

7 = Between Satisfactory and Accomplished

8 = Accomplished

Essay The essay text from the answer document or online record is shown.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.30

MessagesIn place of the essay, a variety of report messages might appear, indicating the student’s performance status. Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

Not Tested—Absent The student was absent during the assessment

• Not Scored The student’s answer document or online record was coded “OTHER” for reasons such as illness during the assessment and administration irregularities.

• Not Scored—Previously Achieved Approaches Grade Level The student previously achieved the Approaches Grade Level performance.

Detailed rubric and score point information can be found in the scoring guides on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

D. Document Number and Process NumberThe document number found in the bottom-left corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the student’s record by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the student’s results. The process number found in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.31

9999999999999999_P1 Page 1 of 1 090919-99999999-999999999

STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS SPRING 2021

ENGLISH I - WRITTEN COMPOSITION

NAME: LASTNAME, FIRSTNAME I. DOB: 09/09/99

PEIMS ID: *****9999 Written Composition Score: 4 4 = Basic

A

D

CB

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.32

Confidential Student Item Analysis ReportExample shown: STAAR Algebra I

This report provides detailed student-level results for each course tested. Indicated on this report is the reporting category measured by each test item, the correct answer, and which answer choice the student selected for the item. The information in this report might be useful to students, parents, and teachers for identifying content area or skills students might find difficult and for exploring possible reasons why incorrect answer choices were made. Districts might find it helpful to use the Confidential Student Item Analysis Report in conjunction with the 2021 released STAAR tests.

A. Student and School Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information, both for the student (name,identification number, etc.) and the school (district, class group, etc.). For confidentiality, thestudent identification number (PEIMS) is indicated by five asterisks followed by the last four digitsof the ID number. The report date, date of testing, and grade are also indicated. The date oftesting will be the season and year of administration.

B. Test ResultsThis section gives the student’s scale score and indicates the performance level the studentachieved. Refer to Assessment Scores in the Program Overview for additional information aboutthe STAAR scale scores. The raw score conversion tables for all STAAR administrations can befound on TEA’s Performance Reporting Department webpage. Refer to Performance Standardsin the Program Overview for additional information about these standards.

Information about the assessment is provided whenever the student is assessed with somethingother than the general STAAR assessment. The information is indicated by characters inparenthesis next to the subject.

Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

e Online with Embedded SupportsAn online assessment with embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

o Online with No Embedded SupportsAn online assessment with no embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

pe Paper with Embedded SupportsA paper assessment with embedded supports was indicated for this subject.

C. Item NumberThe item number corresponds to the item number of the released test for that course.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.33

D. Reporting CategoryThe number of the reporting category measured by each test item is listed. An abbreviated listing of reporting categories can be found on the STAAR Report Card. The complete wording of each reporting category for every assessment is found on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

E. Correct AnswerThe correct answer choice for each test item is shown.

F. Student’s AnswerThe student’s answer choice is shown for each test item. A plus sign (+) in this column indicates that the student selected the correct answer. NR in this column indicates that the student did not answer. For items that are not multiple-choice items, the letter “A” represents the correct answer and the letter “B” represents an incorrect answer. Scores for essay questions are not included; student’s scores for these items are available on the STAAR Report Card.

G. MessagesIn place of item analysis data, a variety of report messages might appear. Possible messages are listed below. Changes in policy might result in different messages.

NOT SCORED The student’s answer document was coded “OTHER” for reasons such as illness during the assessment and administration.

• NOT TESTED—ABSENT The student was absent during the assessment.

• NOT SCORED—PREVIOUSLY ACHIEVED APPROACHES GRADE LEVEL The student previously achieved the Approaches Grade Level performance.

H. Document Number and Process NumberThe document number found in the bottom-left corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the student’s record by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the student’s results. The process number in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.34

STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS Confidential Student Item Analysis Report

ALGEBRA I

Date of Birth: District: Student ID (PEIMS): Campus:

Local Student ID:

FIRSTNAME I. LASTNAME09/09/99*****9999999999999

999-999 DISTRICT NAME999 CAMPUS NAME

Report Date:Date of Testing:

Grade:

SUMMER 2021SPRING 20219

† = Item is not a multiple-choice item. For this item, the letter "A" represents the correct answer and "B" represents an incorrect answer.+ = student answered correctly NR = student did not answer Additional information about this student’s performance and a listing of the reporting categories are found on the Confidential STAAR Report Card.

Document # 1000-41743 090919-99999999-999999999

ALGEBRA IScale Score: 3702

Performance Level: Approaches

ItemReporting Category

Correct Answer

Student's Answer

1 . 3 C +2. 1 G +3. 2 D +4. 5 G +5. 4 C +6. 1 F +7. 4 C +8. 3 G +9. 1 C +

10. 3 J +11. 1 A +12 . 2 G +13. 3 D +14.† 4 A +15 . 3 A +16 . 2 H +17. 5 B +18 . 4 H +19. 2 A +20 .† 1 A +21 . 2 C +22. 4 J +23 . 5 A +24 . 3 G NR25. 2 D NR26. 4 F NR27.† 2 A NR28. 1 H NR29. 4 B NR30. 3 H NR31. 1 B NR32. 3 J NR33. 5 A +34 .† 3 A NR35. 2 B NR36. 1 F NR37. 3 C NR38. 4 G NR39. 3 D NR40. 5 F +41 . 4 C NR42.† 2 A NR43. 3 A NR44. 1 J NR45. 2 B NR46. 5 H NR47. 3 B NR48. 4 F NR49. 1 B NR50. 4 J NR51. 2 A NR52. 3 H NR53. 1 D NR54. 2 G NR

F

G

A

B

D EC

H

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.35

Item Analysis Summary ReportExample shown: STAAR Algebra I, Biology and U.S. History

This report shows the item number, the reporting category measured by the item, and the percentage of students selecting each possible answer choice for that test item. This summary report is provided for all students. Districts might find it helpful to use the Item Analysis Summary Report in conjunction with the corresponding released STAAR tests.

Available: STAAR

A. Campus Identification InformationThe top of the report contains identification information for the campus. The course assessed, report date, and assessment date are also indicated.

B. Number of Students TestedThe number of students assessed is provided.

C. Item NumberThe item number corresponds to the item number on the test for that course.

D. Reporting CategoryThe number of the reporting category measured by each test item is listed. An abbreviated listing of reporting categories can be found on the Summary Report. The complete wording of each reporting category for every assessment is found on T E A’s Student Assessment Division webpage.

E. Percent RespondingThe percentage of students responding to each answer choice is shown for each test item. The correct answer is indicated by an asterisk. To maintain student confidentiality, no data are reported if fewer than five students were assessed.

F. Percent Not RespondingThe percentage of students who did not respond to this item is shown in the column with the double-asterisk heading. To maintain student confidentiality, no data are reported if fewer than five students were assessed.

G. Process NumberThe print number in the bottom-right corner of the report is a unique number, per administration, that is assigned to the report by the testing contractor. Refer to this number if questions arise about the report.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.36

† = Item is not a multiple-choice item. For this item, the letter "A" represents the correct answer and "B" represents an incorrect answer.* = Correct answer choice ** = Percent of students who did not answerA listing of the reporting categories is found on the Summary Report.*** = Results for students who took the test with the Braille, American Sign Language videos accommodation, or the paper STAAR with embedded supports are not included in the percent responding results.

090921-99999999-999999999

ALGEBRA I***Number of Students Tested: 163

PERCENT RESPONDINGITEM RC A/F B/G C/H D/J **

1 . 3 1 1 75* 1 212 . 1 1 74* 3 0 233 . 2 1 1 1 72* 244 . 5 1 67* 3 0 295 . 4 1 1 67* 1 296 . 1 67* 3 1 0 297 . 4 1 1 62* 1 358 . 3 1 70* 3 0 269 . 1 1 1 61* 1 35

10 . 3 1 1 1 65* 3111. 1 58* 3 1 0 3812 . 2 1 67* 3 0 3013 . 3 1 1 1 60* 3614 .† 4 58* 4 0 0 3815 . 3 53* 3 1 0 4316 . 2 1 1 61* 1 3517 . 5 1 62* 3 0 3518 . 4 1 1 52* 1 4419 . 2 57* 3 1 0 4020 .† 1 52* 4 0 0 4521 . 2 1 1 50* 1 4622 . 4 1 1 1 45* 5123 . 5 59* 3 1 0 3724 . 3 1 47* 3 0 5025 . 2 1 1 1 43* 5326 . 4 39* 3 1 0 5727 .† 2 37* 4 0 0 5928 . 1 1 1 43* 1 5329 . 4 1 32* 3 0 6430 . 3 1 1 40* 1 5731 . 1 1 38* 3 0 5832 . 3 1 1 1 33* 6333 . 5 52* 3 1 0 4434 .† 3 28* 4 0 0 6935 . 2 1 32* 3 0 6436 . 1 32* 3 1 0 6437 . 3 1 1 23* 1 7438 . 4 1 27* 3 0 6939 . 3 1 1 1 19* 7740 . 5 44* 3 1 0 5241 . 4 1 1 22* 1 7442 .† 2 27* 4 0 0 6943 . 3 14* 3 1 0 8244 . 1 1 1 1 26* 7045 . 2 1 22* 3 0 7446 . 5 1 1 38* 1 5847 . 3 1 12* 3 0 8448 . 4 17* 3 1 0 7949 . 1 1 21* 3 0 7550 . 4 1 1 1 12* 8451 . 2 16* 3 1 0 8152 . 3 1 1 9* 1 8753 . 1 1 1 1 16* 8054 . 2 1 12* 3 0 84

BIOLOGY***Number of Students Tested: 159

PERCENT RESPONDINGITEM RC A/F B/G C/H D/J **

1 . 2 1 63* 3 0 332 . 1 1 1 1 63* 333 . 4 1 63* 3 0 334 . 5 54* 3 1 0 425 . 4 1 1 60* 1 366 . 3 1 62* 3 0 347 . 1 60* 3 1 0 368 . 2 1 1 1 60* 369 . 5 52* 3 1 0 44

10 . 1 1 1 1 57* 3911. 3 1 60* 3 0 3612 . 2 1 1 56* 1 4013 . 5 1 1 1 48* 4814 . 2 52* 3 1 0 4415 . 4 1 1 1 59* 3716 . 2 50* 3 1 0 4617 . 5 1 1 1 44* 5218 . 3 1 1 57* 1 3919 . 1 1 1 1 54* 4220 . 5 1 39* 3 0 5721 . 3 52* 3 1 0 4422 . 4 1 1 54* 1 4223 . 3 1 1 1 49* 4724 . 2 46* 3 1 0 5025 . 5 1 1 1 34* 6226 . 1 1 51* 3 0 4527 . 5 1 1 27* 1 6928 . 3 42* 3 1 0 5429 . 2 1 1 43* 1 5330 . 4 1 52* 3 0 4431 . 3 1 1 38* 1 5832 . 2 1 1 1 39* 5733 . 4 1 1 48* 1 4834 . 1 1 45* 3 0 5135 . 3 1 1 2 33* 6236 . 2 1 1 38* 1 5837 . 1 1 1 42* 1 5438 . 2 1 32* 3 0 6439 . 4 1 1 46* 1 5040 . 1 1 40* 3 0 5641 . 5 1 1 1 23* 7342 . 3 29* 3 1 0 6743 . 1 1 1 1 38* 5844 . 5 1 18* 3 0 7845 . 4 1 1 1 42* 5446 . 1 1 1 33* 1 6347 . 4 1 38* 3 0 5848 . 1 1 1 28* 1 6849 . 5 1 14* 3 0 8250 . 4 1 1 34* 1 6251 . 3 1 25* 3 0 7252 . 2 1 1 1 28* 6853 . 5 10* 3 1 0 8654 . 4 1 1 30* 1 66

U.S. HISTORY***Number of Students Tested: 195

PERCENT RESPONDINGITEM RC A/F B/G C/H D/J **

1 . 4 1 65* 2 0 322 . 2 60* 2 1 0 373 . 1 1 1 76* 1 214 . 4 1 1 1 63* 335 . 2 1 1 1 59* 386 . 2 1 57* 2 0 407 . 1 1 1 1 74* 238 . 4 1 1 61* 1 359 . 1 1 1 1 72* 24

10 . 4 1 1 59* 1 3811. 4 56* 2 1 0 4112 . 1 1 1 1 71* 2613 . 3 49* 2 1 0 4814 . 2 1 1 1 54* 4215 . 4 52* 2 1 0 4516 . 4 1 1 1 49* 4817 . 4 1 1 1 48* 4918 . 1 68* 2 1 0 2919 . 2 1 1 1 53* 4420 . 4 1 1 45* 1 5221 . 1 1 1 65* 1 3222 . 1 1 62* 2 0 3523 . 2 51* 2 1 0 4624 . 1 59* 2 1 0 3825 . 3 1 48* 2 0 4926 . 2 1 1 48* 1 4927 . 1 1 1 1 55* 4228 . 1 1 1 51* 1 4629 . 1 49* 2 1 0 4830 . 2 1 1 46* 1 5131 . 1 1 47* 2 0 5032 . 1 44* 2 1 0 5233 . 4 1 1 43* 1 5434 . 3 1 1 47* 1 5035 . 3 1 1 1 46* 5136 . 3 1 1 44* 1 5337 . 2 1 44* 2 0 5338 . 1 1 41* 2 0 5639 . 1 1 1 40* 1 5740 . 1 1 1 38* 1 5941 . 1 37* 2 1 0 6042 . 4 1 1 1 41* 5643 . 4 39* 2 1 0 5844 . 1 1 1 35* 1 6145 . 4 1 33* 2 0 6446 . 2 1 42* 2 0 5547 . 3 1 1 41* 1 5648 . 1 1 1 1 34* 6249 . 1 1 33* 2 0 6350 . 2 1 1 39* 1 5851 . 3 1 1 1 38* 5952 . 1 32* 2 1 0 6553 . 1 1 1 22* 1 7554 . 1 1 1 1 20* 7755 . 3 1 1 35* 1 6156 . 1 19* 2 1 0 7857 . 3 1 32* 2 0 6558 . 1 1 16* 2 0 8059 . 1 1 1 1 14* 8360 . 4 1 1 1 27* 7061 . 4 24* 2 1 0 7362 . 1 1 1 1 12* 8563 . 2 1 1 37* 1 6064 . 4 1 1 22* 1 7565 . 1 1 10* 2 0 8766 . 1 1 1 8* 1 8967 . 1 6* 2 1 0 9168 . 3 1 1 30* 1 67

STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS Item Analysis Summary Report

Date of Testing: SPRING 2021Report Date: SUMMER 2021District: 999-999 DISTRICT NAME

999 CAMPUS NAMECampus: A

B

G

FD

EC

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.37

Electronic Individual Student Record File (Confidential)

The Electronic Individual Student Record File contains individual data records for each student for whom an answer document or online record was submitted. The student record includes identification and demographic data as well as assessment scores. Reporting-category-level data are also included.

End-

of-C

ours

e A

sses

smen

ts

2021 TEXAS STUDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INTERPRETING ASSESSMENT REPORTS 3.38

Additional ReportsAssessment reports may be requested for rerun. There is a fee for rerun requests that result from a district error, such as a misgridded answer document. There will be NO charge for rerun requests resulting from a contractor error, such as nonreceipt of reports. The following reports are available for rerun:

STAAR Report Card

• Confidential Student Label

• Confidential Campus Roster—All Students

• Confidential Campus Roster—Students Not Achieving Approaches Grade Level

Additional printed copies of student reports are available for download and printing from the Assessment Management System after scoring is complete. Districts can request additional printed copies be sent to them for a fee:

STAAR Report Card (Spring Administration Only)

• Confidential Student Label

About using Alternate Assessments for TAKS, TAAS, and TEAMSBeginning with the 2017–2018 school year, former TAKS, TAAS, and TEAMS examinees can take the appropriate part of the alternate assessment he or she needs as one way to fulfill testing graduation requirements. More information on the Texas Administrative Code can be found on TEA’s Student Assessment webpage.

TAKS/TAAS/TEAMS Report CardThe report shows how well you did on the STAAR assessment. Passed means your score met the passing standard on the assessment. Did Not Pass means your score did not meet the passing standard on the assessment. Your most recent TAKS/TAAS/TEAMS report card can be found by logging into the Texas Assessment Student Portal.