squaring budget 2 nego ring cybri ieszka Ład aw su co te in re de co co co tre wi re sh wo be of...
TRANSCRIPT
BfatmM–atdasdsdi.ParEupsc
Brexit andaced by thhe Europe
member staMultiannua– both withas to the ao the EU
divisions and “net restates will differencessimple “ndivision. T.e., the
Poland andand Romanreferred to European, ountil now, mprotection structural common ag
EU –
d the eve Europea
ean Union ates to refl Financial
h regard to mounts of
U’s prioritbetween “
ecipients” amost like
s might gonet paye
The VisegrCzech R
d Slovakia, nia (in thi
as the Cor CEE, memainly ass
of the funds and
gricultural
Sbudcons
volving chn Union arand the reform the ul Framewoits source
f money chties. The “net contamong thely deepen,o further r”-“net r
rad countrepublic, as well ass text, coentral andember statociated witamounts
d monies policy. Yet
Squadget side
Poli
Agni
hallenges re forcing est of the upcoming ork (MFF) es as well hannelled
existing ributors”
e member , but the than the
recipient” ries (V4), Hungary, Bulgaria
ollectively d Eastern es) were, th strong
of the for the
t now,
Policy
aringnegoring
cyBri
ieszka Ład
awsucotein redecococotrewireshwobeof incwotare
y Brief | 01
g theotiatCEE
ef
a
ware of tupport the osts for arrorism or
the worlgion is st
evelopmentountries caohesion poountries weatment oith their pduction in
hifting the ould certaieing left bef the rest crease in tould, in ilwind for gion.
.2018
e cirions
E pe
the new necessity
activities sstrengthend. At the till struggt. That isll for furthe
olicy, and would likeof their coeers in W
n this supfunds to
inly bring ehind and
of Europehe existingthe long populist f
rcle?afte
rspe
challengesof incurrinsuch as ning the E
e same timgling with s why ther financina majority
e to seeountries’
Western Euport in fa
o new chaabout feebeyond the, and cag differenc
run, proforces in t
? er Brective
s, they ng more fighting U’s role me, the weaker
he CEE ng of the y of the e equal farmers rope. A vour of
allenges lings of
he reach ause an es. This
ovide a he CEE
exit es
TupthHRfotodbCwwdDdbpaaaa
Cc
Tcfu2
Te
Sh
*tathp
The aim ofupcoming perspective he challeng
Hungary, PRomania wifollow. As tho begin, the
descriptionsbody of theCEE’s viewwritten non-with civil sedescribed December discussing obeginning, presented, fat the opiagricultural, and securityare formulat
Current beconcerning
Today, the countries arunds. Their
2016 fell be
Table 1: EUexpenditure
Source: http://ec.europa.e
The numbersaken into conshey depend
projects’ implem
f this papeMFF negof the CE
ges that thPoland, Sloill face and he negotiate analysis w
s and initial e text is a
ws based -papers aservants an
countries2017-Janu
or commensome gen
followed by inions on
cohesion y policies. ted at the en
nefits andg the MFF
Central andre net recipr operating between 6.9
U and selecand
eu/budget/figure
s given are fosideration thatfrom the pa
mentation.
er is to anotiations f
EE region, he Czech vakia, Bulgpriorities th
tions are owill focus opositions.
a descriptioon the an
s well on ind experts s, conducuary 2018,nting on theneral posita more detthe futureas well asShort commnd of the te
d future ch
d Eastern pients of Ebudgetary band 0.5 bil
cted membrevenue
es/interactive/ind
for 2016. It nt they differ evayments’ tim
alyse the from the including Republic,
garia and hey might
only about n general The main
on of the nalysis of interviews from the
cted in , without
em. At the tions are tailed look e of the s external mentaries xt.
hallenges
European U budget
balance in lion euro.
ber states’ 2016
dex_en.cfm
eeds to be very year as
metable and
In larrecanagcoin co42FigfunSt
Soinveperhttppol
2014 - 2rgest absoceiving 82.5
nd 32.1 bgricultural ohesion poli
the years ountries was2.5% (Czechgure 1: Pending in putate 2015-20
urce: Percentavestment per Mer Member ps://cohesiondalicy-funding-in-p
Squaring
020, as tholute net 5 billion eurbillion euro
policy. Thcy funding i2015-2017 s between h Republic)ercentage oublic invest017
age of cohesember State. BaState to puta.ec.europa.euublic-investmen
the circle?
he country income, P
ro for coheso for the he percenin public inv in the six 61.2% (Po
). of cohesiotment per
sion policy fuased on Share oublic investmeu/Country-Level/nt-p/7bw6-2dw3/
| page 2
with the Poland is sion policy
common ntage of vestments
analysed land) and
n policy Member
unding in pubof Cohesion Polient 2015-201/-of-cohesion-
3/data
blic icy 17,
T(Wwthama
TatoaimshTththbEinbUind“sfr1sKthUbOgpa“f
1 hn2 BC3 Blih84 Mcreeh
This is still84.2%), bu
Western Euwith 35%). hat the iss
amounts ofmust be hagendas.
The exit of amongst theo the EU b
and France)mpact on fsuggest thathowever, reThis would he UK debahe UK wil
budget as aEU internanstance, Nobenefit fromUK in the nternal mardata from tstructural grom the UK2 to 13 billi
some expeKingdom alshe actual e
UK’s exit frobillion euroOettinger degap should programs (oand the othfresh mone
See the numb
http://ec.europan.cfm.
J. Núñez FerrBrexit on the ECEPS policy b
M. Khan, JunBrexit shortfall.ift cap on comhttps://www.ft.c88f7-5465a6ce
V. D'AgostinoMFF ongoing dcombines the necognizing the
elephants in thhttp://www.farm
l much lesut much mropean couThese nu
sue of the f funds thahigh on t
the Unitede three highbudget (tog),1 will havefuture EU t the scale
emain at a possibly beate, and sel either co
a condition oal market orway), or t
m trade tarevent it r
rket.2 Accohe Europea
gap” in the K leaving is ion euro anerts, givenso benefits effective buom the EU o per yeeclared tha
be filled or, in other her half of iey.”4
bers under: a.eu/budget/fi
rer and D. RinEU Budget: A nrief No. 347, 7
ncker asks EU. EU Commissmon budget, 8com/content/ee1a00. o, Thoughts andebate: Is therneed to finance importance ahe room”? 12 Jm-europe.eu/2
ss than in more than untries (starmbers cleanext MFF
at they willhe CEE
d Kingdom,hest net co
gether with e a seriousfinances. Eof this impa“manageab
e the result econdly, theontribute toof participat
(similarly the EU budgiffs imposeremains ouording to than CommisEU budgetestimated tnually.3 Acc
n that thefrom the EU
udgetary cobudget migear. Comat 50% of tby cuts towords, by
it should co
gures/interact
naldi, The Impnon-catastroph7 September 2
U states to maksion president8 January 201
ec984ab2-f495
nd reflections re a strategy wce new challenand role of “thJanuary 2018,2018/01/.
Portugal in other
rting there arly show and the bring in countries’
which is ontributors
Germany s negative Estimates act could, ble” level. of, firstly,
e fact that o the EU ting in the
to, for get would
ed on the utside the e newest ssion, the t resulting to be from cording to e United U budget, ost of the ght be 6.6 missioner the Brexit o existing
savings), ome from
tive/index_e
act of hic event, 2016, p. 5. ke up for t seeks to 18, 5-11e7-
on the next which nges by he ,
Mapr
AfitsfinshthePoanVisincanophomicoparesuwimeopthea cothitheFin
At thaasarefunexTh
5 BPrepuof t6 JCroaftehtteveDeVisRopolhtt397nisprioFra7 I.CoVoCohttme
apping references
fter the Eur “Reflection
nances” on 2hared their e CEE regoland, the Cnd/or in thsegrad Groclude somend Eastern ppose overowever, awaight be lo
ommon articularly, main the
upported thout, howean by “adpinions of their strong E
direct toonvergence,is issue mue debatesnancial Fram
the same tat the new c
s climate che sufficiennds, althou
xpense of thhat is why
Bulgaria, as theesidency in 20blish any specthis period.
Joint Paper of oatia, Romanier 2020, 2 Map://www.visegents-in-2017-1
eclaration of thsegrad Group omania and Sllicy (CAP) afteps://www.minr729/version/1/
sters%2002.06orities for the amework, 5.ja
Musiałkowskohesion Policyolume 1:1(1) 2ommunity Studp://www.pecsa
e%201%20Iss
Squaring
CEE o
opean Comn paper on28 June 20opinions in
gion analysCzech Repuhe joint deup, some o
e other partEuropean
rall budgetare that theower. In tagricultural the cohes
main buby “adeq
wever, speequate”. Bo
he region, cEuropean adool for s,7 and, accoust be a ke on the mework.
time, the Cchallenges hange, migtly urgent gh this sho
he current pHungary a
e country hold018, will remaicific national p
the Visegrad Gia and Sloveniarch 2017, gradgroup.eu/c170203/joint-phe ministers ofcountries as wovenia on the er 2020, 2 Junrol.gov.pl/cont/file/Declaratio6.2017.pdf, anpost-2020 Munuary 2017.
a, “European ” in: The Revie017, The Polis
dies Associatioa.edu.pl/sites/ue%201.pdf.
the circle?
overall
mmission prn the future017, some cn non-papesed in thisublic and Roeclarations of them extetners.6 Thecountries gt cuts. The amount atheir opini policy
sion policy udgetary quate” resecifying whoth policies
consistentlydded value strengtheniording to theey building
next Mu
EE countriethe EU fac
gration or teto requir
ould not bepriorities in and Poland
ding the EU-Cin neutral and
positions befor
Group, Bulgaria on Cohesio
calendar/selecpaper-of-the, af agriculture ofwell as of Bulg common agri
ne 2017, tent/downloadon%20of%20tnd Non-paper ultiannual Fina
Union Valuesiew of Europeash European on PECSA, p./default/files/d
| page 3
budget
resented e of EU countries ers (from s paper: omania)5
of the ended to Central
generally hey are, available on, the
and, should
priorities sources,
hat they s, in the y confirm
and are ng EU e region, block in ltiannual
es agree es, such errorism, re more e at the funding. call for
ouncil will not
re the end
ria, on Policy
cted-and Joint f the garia, icultural
d/61849/3the%20Mion the V4
ancial
s in the an Affairs,
148, ocs/Volu
inathwthlaththsfaplepcinswdeafremu
TpaEvbthpfumirththimTathmpaCEoahEpthmpbpfe
ncreasing tand and hemselves,
witness its hat the net arger amouhe budget’she CEE sta
spending mairer. They
performanceegislation opolicies anconcentration the opinsavings, hewhere it isdifferences effect, the Eand thus triendly. Thi
expectationsmention buurgently in n
The CEE spropose thaassessmentEuropean avalue shoulbased on he diff
policies helulfil the
main priorrrespective he methodheir mplementatThey do agree that he cen
managed programs (as Horizon 2Connecting Europe Faor Erasmautomaticallhave European projects do hat not al
managed projects conbe even moprinciple caeeling to th
the paymeare also rather reduction. payers will
unts withouts structure ates proposmore effectivy opt for e, simpliof the cohesd for a f
on on resultion of the
elp the mons most nee
among mEU should athe entire is would als of thosureaucracy need of refo
states at the t of
added ld be
how ferent lp to EU’s
rities, of
d of
tion. not
only ntrally
(such 2020,
acility, mus+) ly
a added valnot always l sectoral from Bru
nducted at re effectiven bring moe local com
nts into thready to
than, rathFurthermornot be willi
t broader rand its gove making thve and its a closer
ification sion and agfurther andts. This sho
CEE regioney reach eded and member slso make itsEU, more
so help to se Europea
as the aorm.
lue, while have it. Thprojects s
ussels. Sthe local le, and the suore of an o
mmunity, wh
e budget o do so her than re, aware ing to pay eforms to vernance, he budget
divisions focus on of the
gricultural d deeper ould bring, on, some the fields eliminate tates. In s policies, e citizen-meet the
ans who rea most
national his implies hould be ometimes
evel might ubsidiarity ownership hich in the
wipragmastrcaedecpebemo
Coeq
Allgroteraretheba
FigSt
SoPoReBrefunww7/6
der perspeiorities. How
gainst the ganaged prress the im
ase, the invducation dconomicallyeople’s undee a tool ovements.
ommon agqual treatm
l of the Coup of net rms, and Pe among the case of P
alances of u
gure 2: CAPtates, 2014-
ource: Directoolicy Departmeesearch for AGexit on the Ending, ww.europarl.eu602007/IPOL_
Squaring
ctive also swever, the Ceneral ideaograms. Fportance ofestment in
does not , it also erstanding in fending
gricultural ent needed
CEE countrCAP benefoland, Rom
he top five Poland, thisp to 3.1 bill
P net balan-2016 avera
orate-General ent Structural GRI CommitteEU budget aEuropean uropa.eu/RegD_STU(2017)60
the circle?
suits the ECEE states
a of having For exampf Erasmus+young peomerely pincreases
of Europe g off the
policy (Cd
ries belongficiaries in amania and
CAP recips translates lion euro.
nces of EU age
for Internaland Cohesion
ee – Possible and, in particu
Union Data/etudes/S
02007_EN.pdf
| page 4
uropean s are not centrally le, they +. In this ople and pay off
young and can populist
CAP) –
g to the absolute Hungary
pients. In into net
Member
Policies. n Policies, impact of
ular, CAP 2017,
STUD/201f, p. 28.
TBthcadwHathninmthTincrebbgobamPCthocdre20Gthofi 8 phd9 thRph3n10
ppr.h82]_
The VisegBulgaria, Rhe two-pilla
composed oand the sdevelopmenwith the AgHogan,8 as and call for he CAP and
need to ncreasing member stahe impleme
The CAP nstruments complementeplace,
based suppbe implgradually, ason a vbasis, takiaccount themember Poland, theCAP recipiehe analyse
opts for retacurrent dimension elation to
27 GDP 0.43% of thGDP), as ohis policy e
object to theinancing the T.Bielecki, Ile
polscy rolnicy?http://wyborczadostana-w-przy
Joint Declarahe Visegrad G
Romania and Spolicy (CAP) afhttps://www.mi39729/version/nisters%2002.0
0 Ministerstwopolityka rolna pprzyjęty przez ., Warszawa 2
http://www.min8415/version/120_wer%2020_final.pdf.
rad countomania an
ar CAP, withof direct pasecond on
nt. With thagriculture Cwell as its a better c
d other EU enhance the com
ates in planentation of financial
should t, but not
grant-port and emented s well as voluntary ng into
e specific states.9
e biggest ent from
ed group, aining the
financial in
the EU-(today
he EU-27 only such aeffective. 10 e idea of the direct pay
e z Unii dostan?, 30.Novembea.pl/7,75399,2yszlym-budze
ation of the minGroup countrieSlovenia on thfter 2020, 2 Juinrol.gov.pl/co/1/file/Declara06.2017.pdf.
o Rolnictwa i Rpo 2020 – polsRadę Ministró
2017, nrol.gov.pl/con
/file/Priorytety170516%20[p
tries, as d Slovenia
h the first payments forne financiat, they staCommissioncurrent com
coordinationpolicies. Thits efficie
mpetencies nning and c
the CAP m
an approacPoland ande national s
yments.
ną w przyszłymer 2018,
22717489,ile-zecie-polscy-rolnisters of agrices as well as ohe common agune 2017,
ontent/downloation%20of%20
Rozwoju Wsi, skie priorytetyów w dniu 16 m
ntent/downloady%20WPR%2przyjeta%20pr
well as a, support illar being r farmers, ing rural ay in line naire Phil mponents between hey see a ency by
of the controlling measures.
ch makes d Hungary states co-
m budżecie
z-unii-nicy.html culture of of Bulgaria, gricultural
ad/61849/30the%20Mi
Wspólna y. Dokument maja 2017
d/61603/330po%2020
rzez%20RM
FuanthetreWlevav Figva
So20htt/pu01a408
ThpecoothtopcaAspane 11 C202htt/pu01a408
urthermore, nd Romaniae Baltic Seatment ofestern Eurvels of direcverage (266
gure 3: Direalues for 20
ource: CAP ex15-2020, 13 Nps://publicatio
ublication/541faa75ed71a1/l843483.
hey believeer hectare sountry, whilher specpography, a
alculating ths it is expaper, equecessary to
CAP explained20, 13 Novemps://publicatio
ublication/541faa75ed71a1/l843483.
Poland, a, togetherStates, caf their fa
ropean couct paymentseuro per he
ect paymen15
plained. DirecNovember 201ns.europa.eu/f0184-759e-11anguage-en/fo
the amoushould be e currentlyific condiare taken ine amount olained in tal direct
o make the
d. Direct paymmber 2017,
ns.europa.eu/f0184-759e-11anguage-en/fo
Slovakia, r with Croaall for thearmers anunterparts, s are belowectare).11
nts in €/ha,
ct payments fo7, /en/publication1e7-b2f2-ormat-PDF/so
unt paid to the same
y labour coitions, sunto consideof direct pathe Polish
paymene common
ments for farm
/en/publication1e7-b2f2-ormat-PDF/so
Bulgaria atia and e same nd their as their
w the EU
average
or farmers
n-detail/-
ource-
farmers in every
osts and uch as eration in ayments.
position ts are market
mers 2015-
n-detail/-
ource-
Squaring the circle? | page 5
cmrecuIttrccthinafoscincaththpbfumcwRpaaTopththShepPaoswidam
12
13
awCaR
competitive meet theequirement
challenges),use of the at would alsreaty goal
cohesion ancitizens. Pohe decisionntensity of ago should or current
solution prcountries wncrease thcountries average payhe paymenhe average
position, thebe a more eunds, but
more savicountries would be smRepublic or priority, eamounts areas the PolishThere are aof the Cpriorities difhe agriculthe same
Slovakia andhave many established post-commuPolish, Romagricultural other handsmaller famwhy the Eurdea of suppand mediummuch more
2 Ministerstwo3 According to
agricultural holwas an averagCzech Republiaverages (beloRomania and H
(as all Ee same ts and to, as well aagricultural so be an ims in the nd for the oland claimns concerni
productionnot decide and future
roposed bwould be, the amount
receiving yments andnts for thoe. Accordine result wouequal spread
it would angs, as the amou
maller. For Hungary thven thoue on the sh ones. lso some o
CAP budgeffer in the ural structuin all the d the Czechlarge farmson the ba
unist state fmanian and
structure, d, is div
mily entitiesropean Comporting rathm-sized fae support
o Rolnictwa i Ro Eurostat, thedings in any o
ge of 133 hectaic, while someow 10 hectaresHungary.
U farmers standard
o face thas for a suresources i
mplementatifield of equal righ
ms, furthermng the amo
n made mathe level o
e CAP goaby the mthough, to ts in the
below d decrease ose above ng to this
uld not only ding of the also bring in some
unts paid the Czech
his is not a ugh their same level
other areas et where region, as ure is not countries.
h Republic s that were asis of the farms. The Hungarian on the
vided into .13 That is mmission’s her smaller arms sees
in the lat
Rozwoju Wsi, ie largest averaof the EU Memares recorded
e of the smalles) were found
have to ds and he same ustainable n the EU. on of the economic
hts of EU more, that ounts and any years of support als.12 The mentioned
tter three
ibid. age size of mber States for the
est in
coSlosuwe CoexIn rescaMa20
SoEusochttphes
ountries thaovaks and
upport for laell.
ohesion poxisting gap
2015, msidents (27
apita GDP bap 1: Struc020
ource: Europeaurope, Our Futcial and territop://ec.europa.sion-report
an in the Czechs w
rge agricult
olicy – thes in develoore than %) lived in
below 75% octural funds
an Commissioture. Seventh rorial cohesion,eu/regional_p
former twwill be catural busine
e way to mopment
one in fa region w
of the EU avs eligibility
on, My Regionreport on econ, p. IX, policy/en/inform
wo. The lling for
esses as
minimise
four EU ith a per verage. 2014 –
n, My nomic,
mation/co
Squaring the circle? | page 6
MCPBbreTCpcCscincreinsEcassecsinAoabtoeinO1p1c
14
Otehh15
Ca16
CthEimPs
Most of thCentral anPortugal, SBulgaria andbelow 50% egions.14
The VisegraCroatia andpolicy as convergenceCentral andstated in thcohesion pnvestment creating jobelated to tntegration. should remaEU budget countries aadded valuseen in allsocial and evaluations contributes social incluncluding thAs a study of Economicand direct ebenefits to otal econom
euro from imn the ViseOver this pe
20 billion policy. That
5 contributcohesion po
4 European Co
Our Future: Seerritorial cohes
http://ec.europahesion-report/.
5 Joint Paper oCroatia, Romaafter 2020, ibid
6 How do EU-Cohesion Poliche Ex post eva
EU-15 countriemplementationPolish Ministry summary, p. 6,
hese regiod Eastern
Spain and d Romaniaof the EU a
ad Group, d Slovenia
the maine between Eastern Eheir joint d
policy is thpolicy sup
bs. Its objthe fundamThat is wh
ain one of tafter 2020
also argue e of cohel its dimenterritorial
showingto growth
sion in a ose in nonprepared bc Developm
export benefthe EU-15
mic benefitsmplementingegrad couneriod, the E
euro grosis equivale
tions for tholicy in tho
ommission, Meventh report osion, Brusselsa.eu/regional_
of the Visegrania and Slove
d.
15 Member Scy in the V4? Raluation and foes as a result on in V4 countr
y of Economic ,
ons are lon Europe,
Southern a, per capitaaverage in
Bulgaria, perceive
n tool to n the Wesuropean re
declaration he fundampporting groectives are
mentals of y, in their othe key pilla0.15 The mthat the
esion policynsions – e– and ha how m
h, employmnumber of-cohesion y the Polish
ment showsfits and dire
5 point to es of approx.g the cohesntries in 20U-15 contri
ss to the ent to 80% o
e implemeose four co
My Region, My on economic, s, September 2_policy/en/info
ad Group, Bulgenia on Cohes
States benefit fReport preparforecast of benof Cohesion P
ries, commissiDevelopment
ocated in Greece, Italy. In
a GDP is nearly all
Romania, cohesion
achieve stern and egions. As
of 2017, ental EU owth and e directly European opinion, it ars of the
mentioned European y can be economic, ve made much it
ment and f regions, countries. h Ministry s, indirect ect capital estimated 97 billion
sion policy 007-2015. ibuted ca. cohesion
of the EU-ntation of ountries.16
y Europe, social and 2017, p. 2, ormation/co
garia, ion Policy
from the red within nefits to Policy ioned by t, Executive
AlsrecocobydirancoThstatheporeglesstauncoregneinfcothepofuta orintsainccoopmegounco4.0Buav20becoEU htt_E17 EEUandhtt36418 Eadjhttexpona
so, the Euport on ec
ohesion estountries beny investmenrectly (comnd indirectohesion couhese findinates, clearle budget a
olicy, althougions, shouss developeates undenavoidable, onsiderationgions whic
etworking fluence on
ountry. To ese saved
ossible, as ture cohesifew importientation, tegrated ap
ame time, thcreasing th
ohesion polpinion, resember statood econnemploymenountries (Cz0%, Polanulgaria: 6.2verage: 7.3%0.5%)18 woue not as voohesion pU countries ps://www.ewaN.pdf.
European ComU Finances: thd territorial cop://europa.eu/43_en.htm.
Eurostat, Unejusted, Novemp://ec.europa.plained/index.ally_adjusted,
uropean Coconomic, soimates that
nefit from spnts in cohespanies fromly (as hintries incre
ngs, accordy demonst
are unavoidugh generaluld pay speed regions. erstand so
they should alsh may, dueeffects, hathe developsave some
d funds stated in thon policy stant elemen
flexibility,pproach andhey do not he national icy, as it w
shuffle thees. As regomic situnt rates
zech Repubnd: 4.5%, %, Slovakia%, Spain: 1uld probablyocal for socpolicy ascould be.
aluacja.gov.pl/
mmission - Fae Seventh rephesion, Bruss/rapid/press-re
mployment ramber 2017, eu/eurostat/stphp/File:Unem_November_2
ommission’ocial and tt the non-cpill-overs gesion countrm these coigher inco
ease trade).ding to thrate that if
dable, the clly targetingcial attentioWhile the a
ome cuts believe
so be given e to spill-oave a sipment of the money aas efficiehe joint pa
should be bnts such as, propord simplicitysupport theco-funding
would only,e burden gards priorituation anin the V
blic: 2.5%, HRomania:
a: 6.5% w16.7% and y motivate cial aspect
s the s
/media/33003/
act Sheet, Theport on economsels, 9 Octobeelease_MEMO
ates, seasonal
tatistics-mployment_ra2017_(%25)_F
’s latest territorial cohesion enerated ries both ountries) mes in 17 he CEE f cuts in cohesion g all EU on to the analysed
to be proper
to those over and gnificant
he entire and use ntly as
aper, the ased on s result-rtionality, y. At the e idea of g in the
in their to the
ties, the nd low Visegrad Hungary: : 4.7%, hile EU-Greece: them to
ts in the southern
/EU15_ES
e Future of mic, social r 2017,
O-17-
lly
ates,_seasF2.png.
Squaring the circle? | page 7
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-3643_en.htm.
AccapAscsassTEFCthspreimbpthvthuth
A–t
TthCaspcgCBala
19
Otephh20
GP21
N
An importancould makecurrent leveabsorption. perhaps, cuAccording tspending, contracted mspending oalready beestates, is tosame time dThis tendenEuropean UFurthermoreCommissionhe current
starting morperiod, haseasonably mplementatbroadly simperiod.19 Thhe good ab
valid one. The current
used againshe amount
Alliance bu– the possihe cohesio
The group ohe above
Cohesion Pas open to similarly to tprevious mucountries wgroups undeCohesion PBetter Spenargued for atter insiste
9 European Co
Our Future, Seerritorial cohes
p.177, http://ec.europahesion-report/.
0 Bulgaria, CroGreece, HungaPortugal, Roma
1 Austria, GermNetherlands an
nt argumene for keepels could
The leveurrently notto the Eurmeasured
money, i.e. of which ten signed inoday slightlduring the pcy, though,
Union, not je, accordinn, the rate ot programmre slowly thas now caug
be tion rates f
milar to thohus, ultimatebsorption oThe region slower spe
st the entireof money d
uilding in bbility of a r
on policy
of countriese-mentionedolicy after 2further Wes
the last MFFulti-annual bwere divider the namePolicy”20 annding”.21 Whhigher funded on the
ommission, Meventh report osion, Brussels
a.eu/regional_
oatia, the Czeary, Lithuania,ania, Slovakia
many, Finlandnd Sweden
nt the CEE ping funds be their sl of absot really saopean Com
by the the level ofthe contran the giveny lower tha
previous MF, concerns ust the CE
ng to the of project seming perioan in the 20ght up, an
expectedfrom now oose in the ely, the arg
of funds shofears, how
ending rate e cohesion pdevoted to it
budget negrevived coa
s that in 201d Declara2020 percest EuropeaF negotiatiobudget rouned into twes of the “Fnd the “Fhile the formds for coheneed to lim
My Region, My on economic, s, September 2
_policy/en/info
ech Republic, E, Latvia, Maltaa, Slovenia an
d, France, Italy
countries at their
successful rption is, tisfactory. mmission,
level of f funds for cts have
n member an at the FF period. the entire
EE region. European election in od, while 007–2013 nd it can that
on will be previous
gument of ould be a ever, that could be
policy and t.
gotiations alition on
17 signed ation on eives itself n support
ons. In the nd, the EU wo main Friends of riends of
mer group esion, the mit public
y Europe, social and 2017,
ormation/co
Estonia, a, Poland, d Spain
y, the
spexadConato
HorouCoreaasdeintBuinfcruBafunfinfordigcowhinfneSeSloeqfarcosudifdifthethecrojussusulotcoFrthewofunFuthemiSlothe
Exfo
Thtodpr
pending anxpenditures dditional gohesion” ulamely a larg
cohesion p
owever, it und, if esohesion” coasons. First
s homogeevelopment terests. Foulgaria thfrastructure ucial spendaltic States nding innov
nd themselvr them sucgital ag
ompetitivenehile despitefrastructure eed of furthecondly, whovakia or
qual level rmers, othe
oalition areupportive. Efferent pafferences ineir readinese more so oss-fields cst one ga
upporters. Iuch countriet about CAP
oncentrated ench positioe CEE counould need nds for urthermore, e Eurozoneight divide ovakia mighe rest.
xternal andr not forge
he new chday are a miorities of E
Squaring
d considerto be the
growth. Ttimately acge part of t
projects.
is expectestablished, ould be wetly, the coun
enous in and, subs
r example, e develo
(e.g., roding prioritywish to co
vation. The ves somewhch issues genda, ess matter e the implem
projects, ther investmhile the Bal
Romania of direct
er countriese, as meEven thougrt of then the regioss to build as possibly
constellationathering ofn the last
es like PolaP, left this is
on coheson is not yentries mightto fight magriculture the issue
e and goalsthe region,
ht have diffe
d security petting the E
hallenges thmotivating faU funding a
the circle?
red the qukey to ge
The “Frienchieved thethe budget
ted that ththe “Frie
eaker for twntries are n
their esequently, for Roma
opment ooads) remy, while th
oncentrate mVisegrad c
here in betwas innovatresearch
r more andmentation there is st
ments in thltic States, would opt payments
s from the entioned,
gh this cone budget,on might iother coality at the enn will be buf cohesionMFF nego
and, which ssue to Fraion. This t
et clear enot be afraid t
much more by them
of membes connected, as the euerent priorit
policy – CEEast
hat the Eactor to chaand, for exa
| page 8
uality of enerating nds of eir goal, devoted
his time ends of wo main no longer conomic in their
ania and f hard
mains a he small more on countries ween, as tion, the
and d more, of many till some his area.
Poland, for an for all
possible not so
ncerns a these nfluence tions, all nd some uilt – not n policy otiations, cared a
ance and time the
ough and that they
for the mselves. ership in d to that uro-state ties from
EE opts
U faces ange the ample, to
aafoTthacethboHdSeaodnsadatiwoapEu
InnCscbfisnthSpoRsswag
22
inreSAInsn
allocate morand causes or increasin
The CEE che CEE cou
advantages countries ementering thehere seems
by that provone of the mHowever, wdefinition ofSome southeastern neiand would operations, developmenneighbourhosome counalso by disproportioautomaticallime, the ea
when, at theor challengeand the processes inEastern Paunstable.
n conseqnegotiationsCzech Repuspending thchallenges cboth neighighting the
southern nnecessary, he cost of
Still, this issprioritized nofficial positRomania wosupport Mostress Ukrawill be not aa few yeargovernment
2 The Easternnitiative which elations betwe
States and its sAzerbaijan, Ben this framewotabilisation an
neighbours.
re funds forof migratio
ng the EU’ountries suuntries, sec
of integmphasized e Europeas to be a cviding secumain challe
what is lacf what is ahern EU coghbourhoodrather diresuch as
nt policy ood. As a ntries, like
the Banate amouly in this diast is left bee same timees connect
economn this and oartnership22
quence, is, Poland, ublic might hat adequaconnected wbourhoods.
e causes oneighbourhobut believethe EU’s
sue is not tnow, and tions. One ould rather oldova, whaine. It is pas vocal in trs ago, ast has mu
Partnership ( aims to deep
een the Europsix Eastern ne
elarus, Georgiaork, the EU focnd resilience o
r fighting theon and terro’s role in tupport this curity was ogration thamost stronn Union.
consensus irity for its c
enges the Ecking is a a threat to
ountries perd as a saect funds
that in in the
result, accPoland (s
altic Staunt of monrection. At ehind in thie, the war ited with de
mic transother countr
make th
n the Slovakia
insist on a ately addrewith develo. They agof migratioood is moe it should eastern nethe most urthere are can only exmention th
hile Slovakpossible thathis respect the currech cooler
(EaP) is a jointpen and strengpean Union, itseighbours: Arma, Moldova ancuses on incre
of the EU's Eas
e sources orism, and he world. idea. For
one of the at these ngly while Currently, in the EU citizens is EU faces.
common o the EU. rceive the
afe region to global Mali or southern
cording to supported
ates), a ney goes the same is respect n Ukraine emocracy
sformation ries of the is region
upcoming or the
future EU esses the pments in gree that on in the ore than not be at
eighbours. rgent and no clear
xpect that e need to
kia would at Poland t as it was ent Polish
bilateral
t policy gthen s Member menia, nd Ukraine. easing the stern
relbehisUkthecutheUkoththeproBaReproboregSe
In pedosuanpufraCoPococoindto naWfinprotheexobenanreg
23 T(GeReandHeand20cooshothrinsecoresin s
lations withecause of storical evekraine at the state of it
urrently influe rights okraine in thher hand, sese two obably focualkans, andepublic anojects such
oost the dgion23 or pea region ar
terms oferceived neoes not meupport all pny reservaturchases amework ooperation oland and ountries likeonsiderable dustry will those of Ho
amely, big estern Eu
nanced direoposed Pole Hungarian
xpanding thbligation ofntities reprend larger gions.
This strategy cermany, Austr
epublic, Slovend five non-EU
erzegovina, Mod was propose10 and endorsoperation betwould address seats, lack of ro
sufficient energonomic develosearch and innsafety and sec
Squaring
Ukraine thdifferent
ents. Hunghe EU levets bilateral ruenced maif the Hun
he field of tability in Ucountries.
us its attent be here jo
nd Hungarh as the Ddevelopmenprojects reare also impo
f hard seced to invesean that trojects in tions. Joint of equipmof Perm(PESCO) Hungary,
e Slovakia military in
suffer as morizon 2020and strongrope will
ectly from tlish solutionn way of th
he regulatiof creating senting botpartners f
covers parts oria, Hungary, Cnia, Bulgaria, Rcountries (Se
ontenegro, Uked by the Eurosed in 2011. Bween the counsuch challengoad and rail trgy connectionopment, uncoonovation systecurity.
the circle?
han the forminterpretat
gary’s supel might deprelations, winly by the
ngarian mineducation.
Ukraine is crBulgaria
tion on the oined by thery. For B
Danube Strant of the alized in thortant.
curity issust more in tthe CEE cthis regardt procuremment withanent Straise concwhile the do not ha
ndustry, thmechanisms0 will predomg companiwin the
the EU bun that is in inking is, thons to incl
a consorth smaller, from differ
of nine EU couCzech RepubRomania and
erbia, Bosnia akraine and Moopean CommiBetter coordinantries and regiges as environransport (as wns), uneven soordinated edu
ems and short
| page 9
mer one tions of port for pend on
which are issue of
nority in On the
rucial for would
Western e Czech Bulgaria, ategy to riparian
he Black
ues, the this area countries without ent and
hin the tructured cerns in
smaller ave any hat their s similar minate – es from tenders
udget. A line with
herefore, ude the rtium of medium
rent EU
untries lic, Slovak Croatia)
and ldova) ission in ation and ions mental
well as ocio-cation, comings
InE
AdpcPEhcre
TcdnreuEocreinathOstodsVaimaEimoIta
24
tohbctohec25
ch26
'rh27
k9cp4
ntroducingEU budget
A cross-cudiscussions policy afteconditionalitParticularly, EU budget, have been conditions espect for c
The debate countries reduring the 2not comply efugees. As
understood European sof thinking,certain recipesponse ton the refugealso subseqhe EU bu
Oettinger sashould conso respect fo
denies it isuggested Vera Jouroapproach ismplementedalthough theEU membemplementedon the issuets Preside
against s
4 Juncker rejeo human rights
https://www.neberlins-call-tie-conditionality/; o reform cohe
https://www.eueu/news/francecohesion-funds
5 E. Maurice, Cconditions for Ehttps://euobser
6 E. Zalan, Jusrule of law', 31https://euobser
7 E. Stasik, Jukurka z pienięd9.January 2018chce-przykr%Cpieni%C4%99d42076043.
g more co– scepticis
tting issuerelated ma
er 2020 ty as it per
some netsuch as Garguing fo
that wouldcommon rul
was launcefused to u015-2016 rwith the res the cohes
to be aolidarity, ac reducing pient count
o that countee crisis. O
quently suggudget comaid in May
sider linkingor the rule os his ideaby EU ju
ova in aus directed d by Polaere is no coer states d. Neither ie in the Eurnt, Jean Csuch con
ects Berlin’s cats conditionaliteweurope.eu/a-cohesion-fundA. Robert, Frasion funds, 13
uractiv.com/see-and-germans/. Commission hEU funds, 30 Mrver.com/institstice commiss October 201
rver.com/politiuncker nie chcdzmi. "Rozwią8, http://www.
C4%99ca%C4dzmi-rozwi%C
onditionalitsm prevails
e, howeverainly to the
is the irtains to thet contributoGermany oor introducd help uples.24
ched after uphold EU refugee crisallocation qsion policy sa demonstccording to
these funry could bery’s lack of
Other conditgested. For mmissioner y 2017 thag access to of law,25 howa. The sa
ustice comutumn 201against theand and onsensus athat it shs there a cropean ComClaude Junditionality.
all to tie Cohesty, 2 June 201article/juncker-ds-human-righrance and Ger3 October 201ection/future-ny-seek-to-refo
hints at politicaMay 2017, tutional/13806sioner links EU7, ical/139720.
ce przykręcać ązanie w zgodzdw.com/pl/jun
4%87-polsce-kC4%85zanie-w
ty to the s
r, in the cohesion
issue of e budget.
ors to the r France,
cing such phold the
some EU solidarity
is and did quotas for should be ration of this way
nds to a e a direct f solidarity ions were example, Günther
at the EU EU funds wever, he ame was missioner 7.26 This e reforms Hungary, mong the hould be onsensus mmission. ncker, is 27 Yet,
sion funds 7, -rejects-hts-rmany seek 7,
orm-
al
63. U funds to
Polsce zie",
ncker-nie-kurka-z-w-zgodzie/a-
ultmeFudecoun(inaswhthedir
Acco– goshgein hoBuupevsuwaonnofrothe
ColawCEMiabarehaagmacowhcoeccacoarecoamcotheFuhewaEUcabreTrsothe
timately, thember staturthermore, ecision ononditionality nanimously ncluding thes a result) hether it woe EU Courective.
ccording toonditionality meaning a
o” area. Thared by enerally cal
this respeolding the ulgaria will pcoming moven the Eurupport the ay. Possiblynly to countot inviting tom this mone stick.
onditionalityw is also EE countrinister has ble to blocke implemen
as no conflicgainst such ain argum
ountries – mhich are direondition is conomic anase of mohesion). Me of the
onnection smount of fuohesion polie Europeanurthermore, eard from tants to punU law, it wiall the giveeaking the eaty rathe
ociety, whiche governm
Squaring th
he governmtes will m
it is unn the im
must by all
e ones that as a par
ould requireuncil as be
o all CEEconnected
ccepting rehis positioBulgaria, ling for stro
ect. HoweveEU Co
probably nonths. It seropean Comidea of pu
y, some funtries that ahem wouldney. The ca
y connectedunanimousies. The already sta
k the budgented. But evct regardinga form of
ment raisemainly by Poectly affecte
that one nd political migration –Moreover, th
opinion hould be m
unds in theicy and the
n Semester some op
the region nish a counll be much n governmrules by usr than to h might, in ment’s po
he circle? |
ments of make the dnclear whemplementat
be member
would be prt of the Me a majorityeing a pa
E countrie to migratio
efugees – ion might e
a border onger EU ser, as the
ouncil prenot be vocaeems, thoummission dunishing in nds will be
accept refugd mean resarrot would
d with the sly rejected
Polish Eated that Pet if such sven Slovakig the rule oconditiona
ed by theoland and ed – agains
e should nissues (or
– migratiohose two c
that a made betwe framewore implemen
by a given pinions hav
that, if onntry for not more impo
ment to accsing Article
punish thepart, disag
olicy. Cutt
page 10
the EU decision. ether a tion of reached
states punished MFF, or y vote in art of a
es, any on policy s a “no-
even be country
solidarity country
sidency, al in the ugh, that does not
such a directed
gees, so signation replace
rule of by the uropean
Poland is solutions a, which
of law, is lity. The e CEE Hungary
st such a not link r, in the on and countries stronger
ween the k of the tation of country.
ve been ne really
obeying ortant to
count for 7 of the e entire
gree with ting or
saa
Mc
Arepthaaflathocobthcp
McssEthdofos7RSRcit4joa2mcre 28
Ca29
2coabc0
suspending ammunition arguments.
Managemencross-regio
A further gegion is to
programmeshe right bal
and the speand regionslexibility fo
authorities sheir spec
operational countries woof stakeholdbalance bethe policy
controls, asprocedures.
Most of the countries sesystem of csuch as HEurope Facheir region
different funof centrally ror the ana
show, the s7.45% for Republic, 6Slovakia, 5.8Romania, wcountries tht is betwee404 analyseoined the altogether 22020, whilemillion eurocompanies egion are
8 Joint Paper oCroatia, Romaafter 2020, ibid
9 Statistics of 2020 – short reconcerns 404 cof submitted apagreements forbefore, 30 Sepcontent/upload0-404_calls.pd
these funto pop
nt of EU ponal coope
general posensure in
s (not onlyance betweecific needs. Accordingr national, should be cific objec
programould like to
ders’ competween the and the les well as 28
Central anee the nee
centrally maHorizon 20cility, to mn and devnding fields.redistributealysed regsuccess ratePoland, 8.9
6.35% for H85% for Buwhile for at joined th
en 15.6% aed projects
EU afte278 million e the EU-.29 The reaand institnot com
of the Visegrania and Slove
d.
Polish participeport after 404calls evaluatedpplications anr the impleme
ptember 2017,ds/2017/10/Podf.
ds would pulists’ an
rogrammeration
stulate of all implem
y in cohesioeen thematis of membg to this id
regional acreated to
ctives witmmes. Th
see a cleaetences andresult orien
evel of chea simplifi
nd Eastern ed for reforanaged prog020 or Coake them
velop links . Today, thd funds is vion. As the in Horizo96% for thHungary, 9
ulgaria and the EU-1
he EU beforand 8.3%. s, the couner 2004
euro from-15 receiveason is simutions in
mpetitive en
ad Group, Bulgenia on Cohes
pation in FP H4 calls, The and by the EC ind signed gran
entation of proj http://en.kpk.
oland_in_HOR
also give nti-Europe
s – more
the CEE ented EU on policy) ic support ber states dea, more and local
o address thin the
he CEE ar division d call for a ntation of ecks and cation of
European rming the grammes, onnecting fairer for between
e division very weak e figures n 2020 is he Czech 9.01% for 5.85% for 5 – the re 2004 – From the
ntries that received
m Horizon ed 3,733
mple – the the CEE nough in
garia, ion Policy
Horizon nalysis n the area nt jects gov.pl/wp-
RIZON_202
cococodeactheCeleaCEusAsunasReto Wcoextheinfprolinresquansutenbema
ThnosorecRoto Coauis EuthacaA PowocodifanimdifshanEaproon
omparison wounterparts ompanies froeveloped ancquiring funey win teentral and ads to distEE countriesed to build s matters snused after s no grants esearchers
countries estern rese
ome to the xample, in Ge quality frastructureovided, nobk between sult of co
ualified resend projects uch programndency inc
ehind the Wany in the re
he CEE couot against ome of thcipients froomania, eve
apply dommission uthorities, a
considereuropean onat call for c
an make thesolution
oland and sould be tooalitions cofferent reginother idea
mplementingfferent size
hould help snd not onlyastern Euoposal wou
nly for SMEs
Squaring th
with their Wto bid for
om Westernnd have mnds over thnders morEastern Eutortions. Foes, cohesion
very new, mstand, howtheir initiaare won fofrom the Cwhere ther
earchers haregion. At
Germany onof the
. As no gebody can cthis infras
hesion funearchers in
that couldmmes as Hcreases the
Western partegion.
untries are, the centra
he EU prm the regi
en stress hodirectly to
than ts the Rom
ed much ne. Those changes sue programmproposed, supported o have a onsisting oons. In thea can be a condition
es must rusmaller comy those inropean reuld be to hs.
he circle? |
Western Er the fundsn Europe a
more experhe years, re often thuropean onor examplen funds hamodern equ
wever, theyl funding r
or their expEE region ere are granave no incethe same tne hears p
Polish reneral ovecreate the
structure (thnd spendin the given
d be realisHorizon 202e sense of ts of Europ
however, gal managerogrammes.on, for exaow much eao the Eto the
manian bureworse th
CEE goveuggest that mes more e
for examby the Hun
rule for of partnere Czech Re heard, n that compun togethermpanies in n the Centegion. A have an ex
page 11
uropean s. The re better ience in and so, han the es. This
e, in the ve been uipment.
y remain uns out, loitation. emigrate nts, and entive to time, for raise for research
erview is needed
he direct ng), well
country ed from 20. This
lagging e felt by
generally ment of . Some ample in asier it is uropean national
eaucracy han the ernments
reforms effective.
mple, by ngarians building
rs from Republic,
namely, panies of r, which general
tral and further
xtra line
OTEthcpthbsratrbmGtrwTJbN1thinEsinitlipreitthMthtainJCm 30
M31
sphcwp432
re2hcJEhee
Own resourThere is European Uhe budget n
countries stpotential prohat can br
budget. Accsystem of ationalised,ransparent.
based own mechanismsGNI-based raditional o
work well anThe EuropJanuary 201be at the leNational Inc
.0%.31 Polahe same ncrease tEuropean Ustates do soncrease frots GNI for thke to becom
possible.32 Pemarks abots contributhe increas
Multiannual he 1% ceilaken into cn the V4 noJanuary 201Concerning might increa
0 Non-paper o
Multiannual Fin1 T. Bielecki, N
spójności, więkpraworządnośćhttp://www.dw.ci%C4%99cia-wi%C4%99kszpraworz%C4%42098270.
2 Z. Kovacs, Geady to contrib
2018, https://dailynewchief-hungary-.Valero, Hung
European budghttps://www.eueu/news/hungaeuropean-budg
rces – howa strong
Union that needs to betress they aoposals for ring more icording to th
own resou, simplified For this
resource s should
own reown resourcnd should bpean Com18 that the fevel of 1.1%come (GNI)and and Hutime that their conUnion’s buo. Hungary
om its currehe next fundme a net coPoland hasout the readtions. A gee of the t
Financial ling of the
consideratioon-paper on18.
other possase the bud
on the V4 priornancial FrameNowy budżet Uksze składki i pć, 10 January com/pl/nowy-
-w-polityce-sp%ze-sk%C5%82
%85dno%C5%
Government obute more to E
wshungary.coready-contribu
gary and Polanget,
uractiv.com/seary-and-polanget/.
w to get newargument
the revenue reformed. are ready t
new own rincome intohe V4 non-purces needd and ma
purpose, tand the cbe abolish
esource aces (custome maintainemission afuture budg
%-1.2% of t. The curreungary anno
they are tributions dget if all
y is talking ent 0.89% toding cycle aontributor ass only madediness for ineral statetotal amou
FrameworEU GNI s
on can also the future
sible resoudget’s reve
rities for the poework, Ibid. UE. Cięcia w ppytania o 2018, bud%C5%BC%C3%B3jno%2adki-i-pytania9B%C4%87/a
ffice chief: HuEU budget, 9 J
m/governmenute-eu-budgetnd defend larg
ection/future-d-defend-large
w funds t in the e side of The CEE o discuss resources o the EU paper, the ds to be
ade more the VAT-correction hed. The and the
ms duties) ed.30 greed in
get should the Gross nt level is ounced at ready to to the member
about an o 1.2% of and would s soon as e general ncreasing ment that nt of the rk above should be
be found MFF from
urces that nues, the
ost-2020
polityce
Cet-ue-%C5%9Bci-a-o-a-
ungary January
t-office-t/ and ger
er-
anthegediswhdischstaPoananthesystaMoSzpoNodisauEmcoforEUcoregETbesoancocoprosucoEvoffprosoA intcomeEUscPo CoThbuIn poonneop
nalysed coueir own pr
eneral budscussed. Thhether thescussion ar
hances to beates. In its oland evenny new ownnd rejects pe regressive
ystem. Howatements orawiecki azymański, Possibilities. ot for thescussions uctioning umission Trould be percr raising owU-level poountries, incgion, see pTS as a soue especiallources are nd this ontributions ountries frooblems with
uch a masontribution ven though ficial positioobably also
ource of owngeneral
troduction oncerning oean for theU – whicceptically inoland.
onclusionshe negotiatiudgetary fra
consequeositions migne might exegotiations. pinions are s
Squaring th
untries haveroposals, aget’s goalshey have ra solutionsre reasonae approvednon-paper opposes
n resourcesproposals te nature of
wever, accoof Prime and EuropePoland is re
first timeon raising
under the rading Sysceived as a
wn resourcesolicy tool. cluding thoproblems liurce of revey vocal, astill primarwould mextraordin
om the reh carbon emssive scalein the enethe analys
on in this o object to n resources
challenge or expans
wn resource further fech is ge
n countries
s ons on the
amework areence, the ght appearxpect at the
On somstill lacking,
he circle? |
e not comeas they cls should raised doubs that areable and had by all the on the fututhe introdu
s in the EUthat would f the own reording to th
Minister e Minister eady to dis
e are theg revenue
greenhoustem (ETSa natural cas as it alrea
However,ose from thinked to usenue. Polanas Polish rily based o
make theinarily highgion havemissions bue, as their ergy mix issed states field yet, tthe idea of
s. concerni
sion of sces is what ederalisationenerally pe
like Hung
future multre only just
countriesr very gene beginning me points, or a given
page 12
up with aim the first be
bts as to e under ave any member
ure MFF, uction of U budget
deepen esources he latest Mateusz Konrad
scuss all
ere also es from se gas
S). ETS andidate ady is an , some he CEE sing the nd could
energy on coal, r ETS . Other similar
ut not on carbon
s lower. have no they will f such a
ng the solutions
this will n of the erceived ary and
ti-annual starting.
s’ initial eral, as of such
s, clear n country
https://dailynewshungary.com/government-office-chief-hungary-ready-contribute-eu-budget/
dthrreoogthrevbd
HdRaafaa
GbbwaasfofuhctitospmsfoaacocooL
Asdthc
33
reRhre34
does not wahat has alunning debesources in
of discussioof the V4 cgoals shoulhen the deach these
volume of bottom-up different from
However, sodrawn. OnRepublic, Has well as alike, due tace. Still, o
as one cohe
Generally, tbudget cutsbecause of with the senand agriculanalysed costructure of or farmersunds and d
higher co-coming fromime, the CEo increase
security polproviding emitigating tsolution supor how to e
and securityand cohesiocountries’ pover their ccountries aofficial positon own resLevel Group
Analysing tstates, it isdebate on the opinion
consistently
3 Future financecommendatio
Resources, Bruhttp://ec.europaeport/index_e4 Ibid.
ant to assesready been
bates (for en the Monti ons. As statconcerning ld be ident
discussion e goals shthe budgeapproach m the previo
ome conclun some iHungary, Po
Bulgaria ato the simone should erent entity
the region s are neces
Brexit. Hontiment thature shouldountries cathe CAP a
financed do not agr-funding inm national bEE countriee spendinglicy, espec
external bohe causes
pported by Pextend expey policy wion funds invpayments iurrent 1%
also share ion towardsources pre
p chaired by
the positios already the MFF wns of the
confirms
cing of the EUons of the Higussels, Decema.eu/budget/mn.cfm.
ss a certainn mentione
example, onreport33) at ted in the nthe future tified first, about reso
hould start et be decidshould maous negotia
sions can aissues theoland and and Romailar challennot take t
in all respec
is aware tssary – andowever, it dt funds for d be reduall for retaand direct only from
ree with then cohesiobudgets. At es see the g for extecially in therder protec
s of migratPoland andenditures fothout reduc
volves incrento the EUGNI level. a lack of
s the other sented by
y Mario Mon
ns of the noticeable
will be very region, t
its strong
U. Final report gh Level Groupmber 2016, mff/hlgor/final-
n proposal ed in the n own EU
this point non-paper MFF, the and only
ources to and the
ded. This ake them ations.
already be e Czech Slovakia,
nia, think nges they his group cts.
hat some d not only disagrees cohesion
ced. The aining the payments the EU e idea of n policy the same necessity
ernal and e field of ction and tion. One d Hungary or external cing CAP easing the U budget The CEE f a clear proposals the High-
nti.34
member that the
sharp. In the CAP European
and p on Own
adstrBecostatheis cobalanstrtheexthecothestrcostrquEusuregeff
ThIt susutwcobeof thestrburolwocodrEucogogococotheMiItawh
35 HcomBe36 Fbrehtteueu-
dded valuerengtheningertelsmann ome to theate of the Ce direct pay
inefficient,ompetition. Tasing paymend while neructures ande quoted C
xactly the ote system
onsiderationey say todrengthening
ohesion poliressed by tuestion by urope. On thupport with ogion’s cafectiveness
he debate ois not surpr
upport introdurprising thawo countrieonditionalitiee put in forc
a linkage e Europearess the udget, therle. At the ould like ountries thaift away uropean vaould be seeood approvernments ountries, sucohesion funde documeninistry of Faly, need anho feel the
How Europe cmpetences am
ertelsmann StifF.Eder, Berlin eakers , 30.Maps://www.politrope-germany-rule-breakers
Squaring th
e and is g EU
Stiftung st conclusioCAP, mainyments syst, as it leaThe report eents on the
eglecting hed national laCEE countrther way aro
should the size oay is not t
g EU conveicy, which hthe CEEs,
some exhe other haother EU-mall for and coordi
on conditionrising that tducing any at Hungarys that wou
es linked to e, have combetween co
an Semesteeconomic
reby diminsame timeto have at do not fofrom com
alues. Suspen by someroach. F
of Wech as Germds and rulent preparedFinance in n explanatioey have su
can deliver. Opmong the EU aftung, Gueterslooks into free
ay 2017, tico.eu/article/y-berlin-looks-is/
he circle? |
a direct convergen
tudy, howevn that the ly the alloctem to the Eads to a especially c
e amount ofeterogeneityabour markries’ opinioound, as thmainly taof the farmthe case. Svergence thhas been shas been
xperts in and, what m
member statebetter sp
ination.
nality remainthe region dconditions,
y and Polauld be affrule of law
me up with ohesion poer. They
meaning ishing its
e, the Coma tool to
ollow EU rummonly apending the EU officiaFurthermoreestern E
many (the line of law camd by the spring 20
on for their uffered an
ptimising the dand its membesloh 2017, pp.ezing funds fo
/poland-rule-ofinto-freezing-f
page 13
tool for ce. A ver, has
current cation of EU level,
lack of criticized f utilised y in farm kets. 35 In ons, it is ey claim ke into
m, which Similarly, hanks to so much put into Western
might find es is the pending,
ns open. does not nor is it and, the fected if
w were to the idea
olicy and want to of the political
mmission punish
ules and accepted e funds als as a e, the uropean nkage of me up in German 17)36 orcitizens, injustice
division of er states, 33-42.
or EU rule-
f-law-funds-for-
pEwthrEthorecETptaitsthoa–HaarecBimEewpCmcpifadsmTthO 37
zW38
39
nh4a
paying for tEuropean sowhen needehe given ules. How
European chat punishin
opposite effeed card to t
could simplyEuropean rhThe pro-Eupart of Euraken for grts 87% supshould no hough the f
or nearly a positive – 53%, PoleHungarians and Czechsaverage)38 eminder th
can be sucBritish refermpression EU while receffectively awhy, despitepayers concCEE statesmight have acould see phenomenaf money is tand put intodevelopmenstill remain. mind duringThe joint tahe Budge
Oettinger, sq
7 B. Roguska,
z badań 50, CeWarsaw 2017.
8 Standard Eu9 G. Oettinger
net beneficiariehttps://ec.europ4-2019/oettingeand-net-benefi
he CEE reolidarity, yeed during thcountry br
wever, evecountries hang CEE citiect – that ratheir governy make themhetoric. ropean pubrope that franted, inclupport for inlonger be
figures still half of Cimage of es – 50%, – 42%, les
s – 30%, witthe exam
hat anti-Euccessful in rendum alsof contributceiving too abused bye their undecerns and s stress than opposite
themselv such as tetaken from o other puntal gaps b
This aspeg the upcsk ahead wet Commquaring the
Jakiej Unii chentre for Publi
urobarometer 8r, A new deal bes, blog post fpa.eu/commiser/blog/new-dciaries_en.
egion in theet not gettinhe refugee creaks the en some ave raised zens mightather than snments, sucm bolder in
blic attitudefor years huding in Pontegration ie a certain
show that aCEE citizethe EU (BRomanian
ss for Slovath 40% beinple of Breropean prothe long
so showedting too mulittle in retu
y populists.erstanding new challe
hat the bude effect. CEes as vierrorism or the cohesiorposes eve
between thect should b
coming negwill be, as issioner, circle.39
hcą Polacy? Kc Opinion Res
88, Autumn 20between net pfrom 25 Octobssion/commisseal-between-n
e name of g support
crisis, or if common Western
concerns t bring the showing a ch moves their anti-
es in this had been oland with n 2017,37
nty. Even a majority
ens have Bulgarians s – 47%, ks – 38% ng the EU exit is a opaganda run. The that the
uch to the rn can be . That is of the net nges, the dget cuts E citizens ctims of migration on basket
en though e regions be kept in gotiations. stated by Guenther
Komunikat search,
017. payers and ber 2017, sioners/201net-payers-
DrEuAna p
ThBieva
Cover phoFineas/VlasProof read Address | CGabriele ScSenior ProjProgram ThBertelsmanTelephone Mobile Fax Gabriele.scwww.bertel Dr. AgnieszDirector of t/Senior AnaInstitute of Telephone Fax agnieszka.lwww.isp.org
r. Agnieszkuropean nalyst in thprivate Pol
he author elecki, Bru
aluable rema
Squaring th
to stimil Šesták/foing: Elena Ro
Contact chöler ect Manager he Future of En Stiftung
+49 05241 +49 0172 5+49 05241
choeler@bertesmann-stiftun
zka Łada the European alyst Public Affairs +48 22 55642+48 22 [email protected]
ka Łada is tProgramm
he Instituteish think ta
would like ssels correarks.
he circle? |
fotolia.com ozbicka
Europe
81-81205 5207 790 81-681205
elsmann-stiftung.de
Programme
288 262 pl
the Directome and e of Public ank.
to thank espondent,
page 14
ng.de
or of the Senior
Affairs,
Tomasz for his