special slides - heat exchangers and airfin coolers

16
2/27/2015 1 Department of Chemical Engineering College of Engineering University of the Philippines Diliman Second Semester, AY 2014-2015 ChE 142: Chemical Engineering Plant Design Detailed Design of Static Equipment (HEx and AFC) Introduction Heat Exchanger Types Design Calculations P&ID Representation Cost Estimation Outline of Lecture Devore et al recommend the following heat exchanger types: Spiral heat exchanger if area is less than 2 m 2 . Double-pipe heat exchanger if area is between 2 and 50 m 2 . Shell-and-tube heat exchanger if area is greater than 50 m 2 . Heat Exchanger Types Heat Exchanger Types Spiral Heat Exchanger

Upload: mikee-felipe

Post on 29-Sep-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Heat exchanger design

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2/27/2015

    1

    Department of Chemical Engineering

    College of Engineering

    University of the Philippines Diliman

    Second Semester, AY 2014-2015

    ChE 142: Chemical

    Engineering Plant Design

    Detailed Design of

    Static Equipment (HEx and AFC)

    Introduction Heat Exchanger Types Design Calculations P&ID Representation Cost Estimation

    Outline of Lecture

    Devore et al recommend the

    following heat exchanger types:

    Spiral heat exchanger if area is less than 2 m2.

    Double-pipe heat exchanger if area is between 2 and 50 m2.

    Shell-and-tube heat exchanger if area is greater than 50 m2.

    Heat Exchanger Types Heat Exchanger TypesSpiral Heat Exchanger

  • 2/27/2015

    2

    Heat Exchanger TypesDouble Pipe Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Shell and tube heat exchangers are

    broadly classified into two: removable

    and non-removable tube bundle.

    Of the two classifications, the cheapest

    options are the U-tube heat exchanger

    and the fixed tubesheet heat exchanger

    respectively.

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

  • 2/27/2015

    3

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Cheaper for the same heat transfer

    area, but cant clean shell side.

    Costlier for the same heat transfer

    area, but can clean shell side.

  • 2/27/2015

    4

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Heat Exchanger TypesShell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Design Calculations

    Design and draw the P&ID representation of

    a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with the

    following information:

    Design CalculationsProblem Statement

  • 2/27/2015

    5

    Fluid Placement

    Place the fluid on the tube side if it is:

    (arranged in order of priority)

    1. Corrosive

    2. Cooling water

    3. More fouling

    4. Less viscous

    5. More pressurized

    6. Hotter

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Fluid Placement

    Fouling factors (refer to Table 3.3)

    Crude oil = 0.004-0.005 hr-ft2-F/Btu

    Kerosene = 0.001-0.003 hr-ft2-F/Btu

    Place the crude oil and kerosene in tube

    side and shell side respectively.

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Shell and Head Type

    What shell and tube heat exchanger type

    is suitable for this service, BEU or BEM?

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Tube and Tubing Layout

    The following guidelines are

    observed in the selection of tube

    dimensions and layout:

    14 BWG tubes with 1 triangular pitch for straight tubes

    1 14 BWG tubes with 1 square pitch for U-tubes

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

  • 2/27/2015

    6

    Tube and Tubing Layout

    What are the advantages and disadvantages

    of triangular pitch over square pitch?

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Tube and Tubing Layout

    The preferred straight tube lengths are 16 ft

    and 20 ft. For the same heat transfer area,

    which is more economical?

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Longer but thinner

    heat exchanger?

    Shorter but fatter

    heat exchanger?

    Baffle Dimensions

    The baffle spacing is recommended to

    be between 20% and 100% of the

    shell diameter. The default is 20%.

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    Baffle Dimensions

    The baffle cut is recommended to be

    between 15% and 45%. The default is 20%.

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

  • 2/27/2015

    7

    Allowable pressure drop for shell and tube

    exchangers and air coolers in pumped liquid

    service may be considered as follows:

    Design CalculationsMaximum Pressure Drop

    Viscosity (cP)Allowable Pressure Drop (psi)

    Shell Side Tube Side

    Less than 1.0 5.0 10

    1.0 to 5.0 7.5 10

    5.0 to 15.0 10 15

    15.0 to 25.0 15 20

    25.0 to 50.0 15 25

    Allowable pressure drop for shell and tube

    exchangers and air coolers in condensing

    service may be considered as follows:

    Pressure (psig) Allowable Pressure Drop (psi)

    Up to 50 2.5 per shell

    50 and above 5.0 per shell

    Design CalculationsMaximum Pressure Drop

    The initial specifications are as follows: Kerosene at shell, crude oil at tube

    o Kerosene = 0.003 hr-ft2-F/Btu

    o Crude oil = 0.005 hr-ft2-F/Btu

    Heat exchanger type BEU 1 14 BWG tubes with 1 square pitch

    o Outer diameter (Do) = 1.000 in

    o Inner diameter (Di) = 0.834 in

    o Tube pitch (PT) = 1.250 in

    o Clearance (C) = 0.250 in

    Tube length of 20 ft Baffle spacing of 20% of shell diameter Baffle cut of 20% Maximum shell-side P = 5.0 psi Maximum tube-side P = 10.0 psi

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

    The initial specifications are as follows: Kerosene at shell, crude oil at tube

    o Kerosene = 5.248 x 10-4 m2-K/W

    o Crude oil = 8.806 x 10-4 m2-K/W

    Heat exchanger type BEU 1 14 BWG tubes with 1 square pitch

    o Outer diameter (Do) = 0.02540 m

    o Inner diameter (Di) = 0.02118 m

    o Tube pitch (PT) = 0.03175 m

    o Clearance (C) = 0.00635 m

    Tube length of 6.096 m Baffle spacing of 20% of shell diameter Baffle cut of 20% Maximum shell-side P = 34.46 kPa Maximum tube-side P = 68.93 kPa

    Design CalculationsInitial Specifications

  • 2/27/2015

    8

    Assume that only one shell pass will suffice.

    Calculate the LMTD correction factor (F).

    Design CalculationsNumber of Shell Passes

    Assume that only one shell pass will suffice.

    Calculate the LMTD correction factor (F).

    Design CalculationsNumber of Shell Passes

    If calculated F is less than 0.80, set the

    number of shell passes to two.

    Design CalculationsNumber of Shell Passes

    Calculate the area using the equation

    Q = UAFTlm

    Estimate the overall heat transfer

    coefficient using the individual heat

    transfer coefficients (should have been

    done during ChE 141).

    Design CalculationsEstimated Area

  • 2/27/2015

    9

    The heat exchanger area is equal to the

    surface area of each tube multiplied by

    the number of tubes:

    A = nt x (DoL)

    Design CalculationsMinimum Number of Tubes

    The tube-side fluid loses pressure as it

    expands at the inlet nozzle, flows inside the

    tubes, and contracts at the outlet nozzle.

    Assume that nozzle losses are negligible.

    How can the maximum number of tube

    passes be calculated using the equation

    above?

    Design CalculationsMaximum Number of Tube Passes

    Given the heat exchanger type and the tube-

    side details, a shell diameter can be selected:

    Design CalculationsShell Diameter

    Given the selected tube length and

    the tube count on the selected shell

    diameter, calculate the area available

    for heat exchange:

    A = nt x (DoL)

    Calculate the required overall heat

    transfer coefficient:

    Ureq = Q/AFTlm

    Design CalculationsRequired Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient

  • 2/27/2015

    10

    The tube-side heat transfer coefficient is

    calculated using the Seider-Tate and Hausen

    equations. Viscosity correction is neglected:

    Design CalculationsInside Heat Transfer Coefficient

    The shell-side heat transfer coefficient is

    calculated using the following correlation.

    Viscosity correction is neglected:

    Design CalculationsOutside Heat Transfer Coefficient

    Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficient

    using the equation below. Metal resistance is

    neglected:

    The magnitude of oversize is based on the

    required overall heat transfer coefficient.

    Design CalculationsOverall Heat Transfer Coefficient

    The tube-side fluid loses pressure as it

    expands at the inlet nozzle, flows inside the

    tubes, and contracts at the outlet nozzle.

    Assume that nozzle losses are negligible.

    Design CalculationsTube-Side Pressure Drop

  • 2/27/2015

    11

    Design CalculationsShell-Side Pressure Drop

    The shell-side fluid loses pressure as it

    expands at the inlet nozzle, flows outside the

    tubes, and contracts at the outlet nozzle.

    Assume that nozzle losses are negligible.

    What adjustments need to be done?

    Design CalculationsDesign Assessment

    Case

    Is overall HTC

    greater than

    required?

    Is tube-side

    P less than

    maximum?

    Is shell-side

    P less than

    maximum?

    1 YES YES YES

    2 YES YES NO

    3 YES NO YES

    4 NO YES YES

    P&ID Representation P&ID Representation

  • 2/27/2015

    12

    P&ID Representation P&ID Representation

    P&ID Representation Cost Estimation

    Towler and Sinnott (2008) expressed the

    January 2006 purchased cost of heat

    exchangers as a function of area.

  • 2/27/2015

    13

    Air Fin Coolers

    Because of low heat

    transfer coefficient on

    the air side, the tubes

    are finned to increase

    the area available for

    heat transfer.

    Air Fin Coolers

    Air fin coolers are second only to shell-

    and-tube heat exchangers in frequency

    of occurrence in chemical and

    petroleum processing operations.

    Assuming no process restrictions,

    when is air cooling economically

    advantageous over water cooling?

    Air Fin Coolers Air Fin CoolersForced Draft Air Fin Coolers

  • 2/27/2015

    14

    Air Fin CoolersInduced Draft Air Fin Coolers

    Air Fin CoolersForced vs. Induced Draft Air Fin Coolers

    Differentiate the two configurations in

    terms of:

    1. Accessibility of tubes and fan parts

    2. Fan power consumption for the same

    mass flowrate of air

    3. Area for the same air fin cooler duty

    Air Fin CoolersForced vs. Induced Draft Air Fin Coolers

    Air Fin CoolersForced vs. Induced Draft Air Fin Coolers

  • 2/27/2015

    15

    Air Fin CoolersForced vs. Induced Draft Air Fin Coolers

    For inlet process fluids above 350F,

    use forced draft configuration.

    Air Fin CoolersTube Dimensions

    Tube lengths are typically from 6 ft to 50 ft,

    with 40 ft commonly used. Tubes are

    typically stacked from three to eight rows,

    with six rows commonly used.

    Air Fin CoolersTube Dimensions

    Air Fin CoolersBay Dimensions

    Bay widths are typically from 4 ft to 30 ft, with

    14 ft commonly used. Axial-flow fans with four

    or six blades and diameters of 6 ft to 18 ft are

    typically employed.

  • 2/27/2015

    16

    Department of Chemical Engineering

    College of Engineering

    University of the Philippines Diliman

    Second Semester, AY 2014-2015

    ChE 142: Chemical

    Engineering Plant Design

    Detailed Design of

    Static Equipment (HEx and AFC)