special report year ahead 121609

Upload: ejlamas

Post on 30-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Special Report Year Ahead 121609

    1/5

    David A. Rosenberg December 16, 2009Chief Economist & Strategist Economic [email protected]+ 1 416 681 8919

    MARKET MUSINGS & DATA DECIPHERING

    Special Report Year Ahead: Can YouHandle the Truth?

    Its that time of the year when sell-side research departments publish their

    Year-Ahead Reports (as I once did in the not-too-distant past); as do all the

    financial magazines.

    After countless emails and

    phone conversations, I

    realized that there was a

    high expectation that I

    publish a year-ahead

    report

    I realized after countless emails and phone conversations (in that order) that there

    is a very high expectation that I publish one too. I honestly have no intention of

    publishing a specific set of forecasts in my current role as the Chief Economist and

    Strategist for Gluskin Sheff for public consumption the granularity of myrecommendations is reserved for our Investment team and our client base. Be

    that as it may, I am more than happy to comment on what I see as an emerging

    consensus and my general view on the direction of the economy and the markets

    in the coming year without getting into too much detail or numerical forecasts,

    which are the domain of the sell-side macro teams globally.

    At the outset, let it be known that when I read everyone elses year-ahead

    prognostications, all I can think of is, where do I store this stuff for a year so I

    can look back and say That was so wrong!. Its not that the reports are always

    bullish every year; it is that they seem so contrived. And, as I mentioned in the

    December 10th edition of Breakfast with Dave, this year, probably like most

    years, there seems to be a remarkable level of agreement. Based on my

    reading, here is what I conclude the consensus views are as we head into 2010:

    Having read various Year-

    Ahead Reports, it sure

    seems like there is a

    remarkable level of

    agreement for 2010

    Muted recovery, but positive growth, for sure! No risk of a double dip. Equity markets up! A barbell strategy of domestic multinational blue chips and emerging market

    equities.

    The U.S. dollar isneutral, but we did locate more bulls than bears (so muchfor the carry trade thesis).

    Positive on commodities for the most part. Concerned about government balance sheets, and therefore Bearish on long term government bonds because they are the competition

    and, after all, who would tie their money up for 10 years at 3.5% when youcan lose 22% in stocks? And, therefore

    Bullish on spread product (as long as its not long-term). And, therefore Really comfortable with high yield (just for the coupon and the view that

    default rates will come down).

    Certain that volatility will not be an impediment. The Fed will begin to raise rates in the second half of the year, but that this

    will have no impact since they will still be low.

    Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

    Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. is one of Canadas pre-eminent wealth management firms. Founded in 1984 and focused primarily on high networth private clients, we are dedicated to meeting the needs of our clients by delivering strong, risk-adjusted returns together with the highest

    level of personalized client service. For more information or to subscribe to Gluskin Sheff economic reports,

    visitwww.gluskinsheff.com

  • 8/14/2019 Special Report Year Ahead 121609

    2/5

  • 8/14/2019 Special Report Year Ahead 121609

    3/5

    December 16, 2009 SPECIAL REPORT YEAR AHEAD

    Page 3 of 5

    Perhaps inflation is a consensus forecast but deflation is the present day reality

    and often lingers for years following a busted asset and credit bubble of the

    magnitude we have endured over the past two years. The fact that Chinas

    voracious appetite for basic materials will continue to exert upward pressure on

    commodity prices does not detract from this view, especially given the

    widespread excess capacity in the manufacturing sector and the new frugality

    that has gripped, and in many cases, been embraced by the retail sector. Higher

    raw material prices, owing to developments in Asia as opposed to demand

    pressures here at home, will prove to be a sustained source of profit margin

    compression for many sectors and companies linked to finished consumer

    goods and services.

    Perhaps inflation is a

    consensus forecast, butdeflation is the present

    day reality

    So, much of what I have read in various Year-Ahead Reports predict corporate

    earnings, GDP growth here and abroad, interest rates and relative values of

    currencies. As I mentioned earlier, the error term is bound to be very wide in this

    new paradigm (since WWII) of a secular credit collapse. GDP growth in 1934

    was 10%, but the Depression wasnt over until 1940.

    Since 1989, the Japanese stock market has had no fewer than four 50%-plus

    rallies and there still has been no period of growth that can be called a

    sustained expansion. Today, we have our own special set of conditions and it is

    bound to be tricky as is typical during a post-bubble credit collapse, no matter

    how intense the government reaction. Prematurely committing to the risk trade

    is probably going to be the most lamentable action over the next few years.

    Suffice it to say, we believe that the dominant focus will be on capital

    preservation and income orientation, whether that be in bonds, hybrids, hedge

    fund strategies, and a consistent focus on reliable dividend growth and dividend

    yield would seem to be in order. To reiterate, I see the range of outcomes in the

    financial markets and the economy to be extremely wide at the current time.

    But one conclusion I think we can agree on is the need to maintain defensive

    strategies and minimize volatility and downside risks as well as to focus on

    where the secular fundamentals are positive such, as in fixed-income and in

    equity sectors that lever off the commodity sector.

    We believe that the

    dominant focus thiscoming year will be on

    capital preservation and

    income orientation

    This, in turn, underscores my primary focus of favouring Canadian dollar

    based investments over the U.S. because at no time in my professional life

    have the downside risks economic, fiscal, financial and political been so

    low on a relative basis and the upside potential so high as is the case today.

    The near-2,000 basis point gap this year between the TSX and the S&P 500

    the former leading should be taken in the context of being just past thehalfway point of a secular (ie, 16-18 year) period of outperformance. Northern

    exposure never felt this hot.

  • 8/14/2019 Special Report Year Ahead 121609

    4/5

    December 16, 2009 SPECIAL REPORT YEAR AHEAD

    Gluskin Sheffat a Glance

    Gluskin Sheff+ Associates Inc. is one of Canadas pre-eminent wealth management firms.Founded in 1984 and focused primarily on high net worth private clients, we are dedicated to theprudent stewardship of our clients wealth through the delivery of strong, risk-adjustedinvestment returns together with the highest level of personalized client service.OVERVIEW

    As of September30, 2009, the Firmmanaged assets of$5.0 billion.

    Gluskin Sheff became a publicly tradedcorporation on the Toronto StockExchange (symbol: GS) in May2006 andremains 65% owned by its senior

    management and employees. We havepublic company accountability andgovernance with a private companycommitment to innovation and service.

    Our investment interests are directlyaligned with those of our clients, asGluskin Sheffs management andemployees are collectively the largestclient of the Firms investment portfolios.

    We offer a diverse platform of investmentstrategies (Canadian and U.S. equities,Alternative and Fixed Income) andinvestment styles (Value, Growth and

    Income).1

    The minimum investment required toestablish a client relationship with theFirm is $3 million for Canadian investorsand $5 million for U.S. & Internationalinvestors.

    PERFORMANCE

    $1 million invested in our Canadian ValuePortfolio in 1991 (its inception date)

    would have grown to $15.5 million2

    onSeptember 30, 2009 versus $9.7millionfor the S&P/TSX Total Return Index

    over the same period.$1 million usd invested in our U.S.Equity Portfolio in 1986 (its inceptiondate) would have grown to $11.2 millionusd

    2on September 30, 2009 versus $8.7

    million usd for the S&P500TotalReturn Index over the same period.

    INVESTMENT STRATEGY & TEAM

    We have strong and stable portfoliomanagement, research and client serviceteams. Aside from recent additions, ourPortfolio Managers have been with theFirm for a minimum of ten years and wehave attracted best in class talent at all

    levels. Our performance results are thoseof the team in place.

    Our investmentinterests are directlyaligned with those ofour clients, as Gluskin

    Sheffs management andemployees arecollectively the largestclient of the Firmsinvestment portfolios.

    $1 million invested in our

    Canadian Value Portfolio

    in 1991 (its inception

    date) would have grown to

    $15.5 million2 on

    September 30, 2009

    versus $9.7 million for the

    S&P/TSX Total Return

    Index over the same

    period.

    We have a strong history of insightfulbottom-up security selection based onfundamental analysis. For long equities, welook for companies with a history of long-term growth and stability, a proven trackrecord, shareholder-minded managementand a share price below our estimate ofintrinsic value. We look for the opposite inequities that we sell short. For corporatebonds, we look for issuers with a margin ofsafety for the payment of interest andprincipal, and yields which are attractive

    relative to the assessed credit risks involved.

    We assemble concentrated portfolios our top ten holdings typicallyrepresent between 25% to 45% of aportfolio. In this way, clients benefitfrom the ideas in which we have thehighest conviction.

    Our success has often been linked to ourlong history of investing in under-followed and under-appreciated smalland mid cap companies both in Canadaand the U.S.

    PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION

    For further information,

    please contact

    [email protected]

    In terms of asset mix and portfolioconstruction, we offer a unique marriagebetween our bottom-up security-specificfundamental analysis and our top-downmacroeconomic view, with the notedaddition of David Rosenberg as ChiefEconomist & Strategist.

    Page 4 of 5

    Notes:Unless otherwise noted, all values are in Canadian dollars.

    1. Not all investment strategies are available to non-Canadian investors. Please contact Gluskin Sheff for information specific to your situation.2. Returns are based on the composite of segregated Value and U.S. Equity portfolios, as applicable, and are presented net of fees and expenses.

  • 8/14/2019 Special Report Year Ahead 121609

    5/5

    December 16, 2009 SPECIAL REPORT YEAR AHEAD

    IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

    Copyright 2009 Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. (Gluskin Sheff). All rights

    reserved. This report is prepared for the use of Gluskin Sheff clients andsubscribers to this report and may not be redistributed, retransmitted ordisclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the expresswritten consent of Gluskin Sheff. Gluskin Sheff reports are distributedsimultaneously to internal and client websites and other portals by GluskinSheff and are not publicly available materials. Any unauthorized use ordisclosure is prohibited.

    Gluskin Sheff may own, buy, or sell, on behalf of its clients, securities ofissuers that may be discussed in or impacted by this report. As a result,readers should be aware that Gluskin Sheff may have a conflict of interest

    that could affect the objectivity of this report. This report should not beregarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgmentand readers are encouraged to seek independent, third-party research onany companies covered in or impacted by this report.

    Individuals identified as economists do not function as research analystsunder U.S. law and reports prepared by them are not research reports underapplicable U.S. rules and regulations. Macroeconomic analysis isconsidered investment research for purposes of distribution in the U.K.

    under the rules of the Financial Services Authority.

    Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer or aninvitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financialinstrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g.,options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences). This report is notintended to provide personal investment advice and it does not take intoaccount the specific investment objectives, financial situation and theparticular needs of any specific person. Investors should seek financialadvice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial instrumentsand implementing investment strategies discussed or recommended in thisreport and should understand that statements regarding future prospectsmay not be realized. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities inany offering must be based solely on existing public information on suchsecurity or the information in the prospectus or other offering documentissued in connection with such offering, and not on this report.

    Securities and other financial instruments discussed in this report, orrecommended by Gluskin Sheff, are not insured by the Federal DepositInsurance Corporation and are not deposits or other obligations of anyinsured depository institution. Investments in general and, derivatives, inparticular, involve numerous risks, including, among others, market risk,counterparty default risk and liquidity risk. No security, financial instrumentor derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities andother financial instruments may be difficult to value or sell and reliableinformation about the value or r isks related to the security or financialinstrument may be difficult to obtain. Investors should note that incomefrom such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuateand that price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fall

    and, in some cases, investors may lose their entire principal investment.

    Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Levelsand basis for taxation may change.

    Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price orincome of any security or financial instrument mentioned in this report.Investors in such securities and instruments effectively assume currencyrisk.

    Materials prepared by Gluskin Sheff research personnel are based on publicinformation. Facts and views presented in this material have not beenreviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals inother business areas of Gluskin Sheff. To the extent this report discussesany legal proceeding or issues, it has not been prepared as nor is itintended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investorsshould consult their own legal advisers as to issues of law relating to thesubject matter of this report. Gluskin Sheff research personnels knowledgeof legal proceedings in which any Gluskin Sheff entity and/or its directors,officers and employees may be plaintiffs, defendants, co-defendants or co-plaintiffs with or involving companies mentioned in this report is based onpublic information. Facts and views presented in this material that relate to

    any such proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed with, and maynot reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas ofGluskin Sheff in connection with the legal proceedings or matters relevant

    to such proceedings.

    Any information relating to the tax status of financial instruments discussedherein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone toprovide tax advice. Investors are urged to seek tax advice based on theirparticular circumstances from an independent tax professional.

    The information herein (other than disclosure information relating to GluskinSheff and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and GluskinSheff does not guarantee its accuracy. This report may contain links to

    third-party websites. Gluskin Sheff is not responsible for the content of anythird-party website or any linked content contained in a third-party website.Content contained on such third-party websites is not part of this report andis not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link in

    this report does not imply any endorsement by or any affiliation with GluskinSheff.

    All opinions, projections and estimates constitute the judgment of theauthor as of the date of the report and are subject to change without notice.Prices also are subject to change without notice. Gluskin Sheff is under noobligation to update this report and readers should therefore assume thatGluskin Sheff will not update any fact, circumstance or opinion contained in

    this report.

    Neither Gluskin Sheff nor any director, officer or employee of Gluskin Sheffaccepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequentialdamages or losses arising from any use of this report or its contents.

    Page 5 of 5